S :This sounds like a possibility..do not want to see her
shouldering the grunt work anymore. She is getting tired - the form
is almost 60 yrs old and the health has not come to balance.
So many don't realize the toll of giving continuously takes on the
health-
There are absolutely no
Namaste Swami-G!
Namaste and Great Morning,
*I have been working for almost four weeks now. My first impression
didnât last long: itâs not such a quiet place after all. The
patients
are really emotionally disturbed and sometimes violent. I have been
kicked and bitten several times:
I am the wrong guy to comment, I am not giving shatipat. Mother Meera sees 1000
people
each weekend ( my details may be off). In one of her books I remember she said
I am not a
Guru. Mother Meera labels it her system of Dharshan. I attended it - it is
about maybe 30
seconds each person,
Namaste GuruJi and Group,
Namaste
Another posting from the same kalki member:
From the 2 people I know who had taken the leyham during the 21 day process it
was a lot of being sick and having it come out both ends. One of the fellows
had wonderful
experiences and does so still 2 years
About the confusion:
I am not enlightened, so it would be not in the best interest to try to clear
things up, only I
can comment on my own experiences, observations, and then to some degree what
::they
have to say.
It was not long ago, that is was My Guru only which I took to be enlightened.
Come find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
Dear Swami G,
Thanks for your mail.
Namaste and OM Namo Narayan-
0- first off have you joined the yahoo group ?
Yes, I joined last night.
0- very good. Please post your introduction and photo as this is an
online ashram
Thank you for posting that.
Being in the Kundalini path and under the guidance of One that has traversed
the path
from start to Realization, the guidance seems quite different that what MMY is
giving, but
that makes sense as TM is not the kundalini path.
However, some of the guidance in my
Namaste,
Namaste and O,
*I have not had too much in the way of kriyas, Just a few leg
jerks in
the past. However, yesterday as I sat in bed reading Kundalini
from
hell to heaven, my whole body began to clench and jerk. What is
the
reason for this happening? I've read that it is the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm did you guys watch the video? It seems so fake.
Such a slick production. The guy seems to have no
shakti at all.
Main interest is more about weather there is lasting eternal peace with One. My
Guru explains
that
To help a little more, this one will share a bit of day to day life
since Realization:
The body wakes up, normal morning grooming still happens (for some
reason the teeth haven't learned to brush themselves), coffee is
made, the kids are woken up, breakfast is eaten while breaking up a
few
There is no evidence that GD choose MMY to be his successor - tmers
believe that based on what MMY has said not anything objective.
There's a huge decades long controversy over who GD's official jyotir
math successor was, where there is some record, and there's no record
at all regarding
The reason why people have problems is most likely they are giving attention to
thoughts of
either the past or what if's for the future, then coloring those thoughts with
emotions. So,
while everything is fine at the present moment, it is not fine for the one who
is off on the
trhoughts and
The scriptures aparently warn of the dangers of messing with kundalini- it is
neutral like
electricity, but electricity can be used for good stuff or to electicute someone
It is MMY that said Kundalini is for idenitifying where one is, indicatiing it
is not something
to move one forward. This
The Non-Dual Viewpoint on mind, levels, vision
The following is a quote from Sri Lakshmana Swami, a realized devotee of Ramana
Maharshi, from No Mind - I Am The Self; The Lives and Teachings of Sri
Lakshmana
Swamy and Mathru Sri Sarada, (p.102-3) by David Godman.
Question: What are the
was part of a process
through which the
message was conveyed. It was alive before his
Realization and also
afterwards. False identification died, not the mind.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron
sidha7001@ wrote:
The Non-Dual Viewpoint on mind, levels, vision
In reply to Ron, who commented that developing psychic abilities has
nothing to do with enlightenment ... bud, I disagree. IMO, the fully
enlightened person
* General comments coming from my Guru are - a person cannot be enlightened-
this is
why it is advised for the sadakas in my path
postings in the past, your guru is of the traditional variety. I read the
interchange you
published on FFL between her and your friend and was appalled. I intend no
insult to you
personally, but Ron, I have to be frank. I just don't go for that stuff.
So I have no desire to communicate
This looks like it could be kundalini awakening or attempting to awake - good
to have
proper guidance, this is not available in TM- it requres working directly with
a kundalini
master that has traversed the kundlini path from start to realization.
In case you have not noticed, I am in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? Too Religious (Hindu)? or could it be that when Siddhas realize
they aren't raising their kundalini (due to lack of tangible
experience vis-a-vis kundalini as described by MMY in lecture
Kundalini) they're NOT
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only guidance needed is one's own inner guidance. It's the nature of the
human spirit
to wake up.
My comments, coming from my path will mirror that of Ramana Maharishi's
admonisions.
Regarding a mentor or
Well Bronte,
The honesty of this situation is I have presented my beliefs. Your beliefs are
otherwise.
That's fine- so this is how it stands.
[Bronte: The only guidance needed is one's own inner guidance.
It's the nature of the human spirit to wake up.]
Ron:
My comments
Namaste Guru G and all
G:Having things stripped bare is not an attractive offer. hahahahahah
people want to have *thier* lives but to have them Enhanced. And
Surrender doesn't equate with the idea that *I* can get *Realization* .
N: Being striped isn't attractive ether all the slobber and bed
The enlightened say that there is no change when the body drops.
People are drawn to very complicated explainations. My Guru's comments is that
people
hear it and dont understand it and think wow he is great. The complexity in all
ways adds
to keeping one from unfolding enlightenment which IS
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--Thanks, this is quite obvious if one defines the me = I; the
notion of a delusional self associated with the mind as an identity
separate from Pure Consciousness.
Hridaya puri:I suppose getting the definitions matching
This is a very complicated post - my opinion is it serves to get the mind
engaged- where
as enlightenment is very simple- the me falls away, then there only IS
They say that then it was known that there never was a me, it was Maya- ego
is the
maya- so no cosmic ego's in my path
--- In
I just read this to swami G and she said yea, that's what happens
It might be quite complicated , but it does/can lead
the mind towards transcending itself. I agree that
enlightenment is simple, but it can come as quite a
shock when the mind attempts to reference itself, to
feel itself as a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an incomplete description
of existence.
Of course, any statement will never replace the reality of the situation
A more complete statement would be IsAS:
modifications
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an incomplete description
of existence.
Of course, any statement will never replace the reality of the situation
A more complete statement would be IsAS:
modifications
interactions by virtue of
ongoing bodily impulses and the capacity to engage in entirely new,
creative, and original enterprises.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt qntmpkt@ wrote:
--The statement
Namaste Sajani and Holly,
When one comes upon That which IS, all else - every little
experience (vision, dream, sounds, Samadhi, etc) that ever happened
is absolutely burned to dust. Visions, experiences, dreams,
insights are all wonderful in that they can help to keep one
motivated to
to express
the inexpressible. It also cuts through the crap
of the intellect, in that one doesn't have to
try to imagine what is being discussed; it is
here and now, part of one's experience.
In a way, it's the thing that Ron keeps harping
on, but never seems to understand
.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron
sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt
qntmpkt@ wrote:
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an
incomplete
description
of existence.
Of course, any statement will never replace the
reality
.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron
sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt
qntmpkt@ wrote:
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an
incomplete
description
of existence.
Of course, any
That's my theory, and I'm sticking to it... :-)
Response: A spontaneous thought that came is yes, as long as there is a me, you
may stick
with that but it is inevitable that when the time is right, you won't be
sticking with the me as
it will only Be, and the Me will be as stciky as if being
--Nope, you're wrong. There is an I after realization but it's not
the delusional I as before.
Response: what happens to that I when you die? ( drop the body?)- and what
happens to
the eternal Being?
By process of illimination- whatever is left after everything else is gone-
this is not
I am not enlightened and can not say from direct experience - I can only pass
along what
3 people here say in my path- then again, the honesty of the situation is
unless it is
known from direct experience, then it is a belief system- so you have my
beliefs
presented.
I will let you know
1. I had felt caged in all these years from not living in a proper vastu
Response from my Guru when I asked is anything had ever caged her in- no
2. cognitions of vedas
Response from my Guru- cognitions, discoveries, knowing what needs to be known
about
anything, sidhis, cognizing all of
I suppose the paradox is there- maybe in thinking of the snake and string it
clears it up-
The significant thing is a process of ilimination for what is transcient and
what is eternal.
All that which is transcient has a reality to it but short lived and therefore
no reality so a
paradox
, and the time frame is favorable- eternity.
Again, intuition says that the following statement from my Guru is correct- it
is never
what one thought it was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ron, unfortuanately you're wasting your breath on
these mala covered
.
Of course, the Me can't gain realization but that's another
topic,
closely related.
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
I suppose the paradox is there- maybe in thinking of the snake
and
string it clears it up-
The significant thing
Response:
I will ask my Guru to comment, as I have been saying, I am not enlightened. I
can only
provide some intellectual response. Such as, the vedas is not what is cognized,
it was
relative things cognizesd- vedic math is relative, so it jyotish, and
scripture. when all
relative is gone,
Comment:
Personally, I get the feeling that the vast maj-
ority of gurus who claim that their followers
need them to get enlightened in reality need
their followers far more than the followers need
them. If the followers weren't there hanging off
every word and paying the bills, these gurus
would
:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Response:
I will ask my Guru to comment, as I have been saying, I am not
enlightened. snip
Comment: If you or anyone else can explain to me how the Vedas can be
cognized *before* enlightenment, I owe you a nickel
Oh well, maybe he did, and certainly from my POV lives the Reality
of the Vedas. And no doubt ime he has the ability to cognize them--
I'm not disputing that. But he sure hasn't had the time to
*document* his cognition.:
Hridaya Puri: One doesn't live the reality of the vedas and at the same time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest
george.deforest@ wrote:
Ron, is the reason you mentioned 'cognizing the vedas' because
of
the rumor spread by TB's (probably purushoids) that Mahesh
www.kundalinisupport.com
if there is further interest, you may want to join the yahoo group, it is
active, not for
lurkers, participation is required
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nayakanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ron!
As a rare visitor to this group (though very
Comment from post:--But Shakti comes from the teacher, igniting the student's
Shakti.
HR: Again, the central issue is that the fallacy is that a me gains
enlightenment. As long
as there is a me that is there, there is further to go. Cognitions belong to
those having
them, absolute IS all
is that a
me becomes enlightened
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, purushaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ron---You don't understand, how many times do we have to go over
this? In Muktananda's tradition, there's a transfer of Shakti from
the BODY(s) of Muktananda to the BODY(s) of the disciple
and his father was an enlightened being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
The use of words may be frustrating in this case. Often My Guru
will say this one
Right, but Ramana Maharshi and others say I'. Saying this one all
the time is ridiculous!..
HP: My guru
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ron (or shoud we call you by your new name?), what's
the name of the guru commissioned by Poonjaji?
-Peter
Well, I took sanyas- it is more karma sanya, the name Hridaya Puri means
something like
living in the city
If my posts are pissing you off, you may consider hitting the delete button
whenever you see
a post from me
All this mix of gurus is probably the reason for your profound
confusion, IMO.
i have had this come up a lot with people telling me this and i found my Guru's
words and
guidance comforting in the middle of the last incident. It was with one
claiming
enlightenment. Something came up like so and so was stealing and then my
inclination
was to point that this is not a good
OK Rick,
Now asking in public so all can participate. I suspect that all of those that
you know that
you say are realized have proclaimed this on their own without their Guru
declaring this,
or they did not or currently do not have a guru, or they have their own inner
Guru- either
in some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you about premature claims to enlightenment. I think they are
common. If the people I'm referring to were saying I have reached the
pinnacle of human evolution or if they displayed egotism or even if they
Amy: Will we become mindless and not be able to write, speak, and
thus work, take care of ourselves, etc. in the midst of this
process?
Sarojini: Oh no, dear, dear one. This will not be the case what-so-
ever. The body/mind will continue on, for the most part, as it
always has. The
**Note- G = Swami Ganaga Puri ( my Guru), the asteric is a disciple of
Christine Breese,
who has videos up on your tube:
As for the real question about whether this is true, RAMANA
contradicted his own teaching that the guru is necessary (and he would
be tickled to see that this has come
HERE IS WHAT RAMANA SAID: THE SELF, OR THE ATMAN, IS THE GURU. HE
ALSO SAYS THAT THE SELF - OR GRACE - MAY GUIDE THE SEEKER TO FIND AN
OUTER (LIVING) GURU.
I'VE NOT HEARD ABOUT RAMANA HAVING AN EXTERNAL GURU. PLEASE HAVE YOUR
GURU SEND YOU THE SOURCE OF HIS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THIS GURU
.
Hridaya Puri
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
**Here is one excerpt from my gurus writtings:
As Ramana melted within Arunachala
obedient and surrendered and never did
he leave his Guru's
I think I have run into more than 20 people in the last 1.5 years claiming
enlightenment,
most are self declared in one form or another ( the other is some confusingh
thing where I
think they are claiming enlightenment but I have to guess at what it is they
are claiming).
Often it is their
.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, oneradiantbeing
oneradiantbeing@ wrote:
DS: No, that was not written to Rick. I thought I was responding
to Hridaya Puri or Ron (I believe they are the same person),
whose
name appeared at the bottom of the post (see below). Please
Ok, lemme explain something- I had experiences meeting many that claimed
enlightenment but it wasn't the case. My experiences were not good. Too many
and too
much stuff to write in this post now. As a result of the meetings for example,
I was
depressed at times, bummed out, and confusion was
Well it certainly sounds hilarious!
0- it IS - it is the great cosmic joke - as there is no one there
to be Enlightened. What remains is Reality. There is Bliss but
not a someone to be blissful. The past is over as if it never was.
The Divine Essence which is Life is what is paramount and
Om Namo Narayan 0 -
why is it that ego has the egotisitcal mindset that through
lurking one has no obligations to support what is given
here, and that if one just remains under the radar that they
will hear Just the Right thing and then they can do it ALL
on their own.
If ego could do it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
brontebaxter8@ wrote:
Gimminee critters, Ron. Here you go again. You are a nice, sincere
guy, but this proselytizing is a drag. Isn't it an edifice of the
ego
Note From Hridaya- I pick out interesting comments from the enlightened in my
Path- 0=
Swami G, S= Swami Fisshananda, and then Sarojini. These short comments coming
from
the three have similar or the same air to them because it is that One essence
from which
they speak. Maybe some enjoy
Title says it all
Namaste Beautiful ones,
Here's a parable:
There was a man who had heard of this great thing called air. He
had never seen air before, experienced air before or even knew that
air existed. So, he went to a local teacher of air to teach him all
about it.
What is air? Where is it? How can I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sgrayatlarge no_reply@
wrote:
Yes, the rudrabhisek is a yagya for peace
Seems like we have been in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bronte Baxter
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:32 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The fallacy is
I haven't been hanging around FFL long enough ( 3- 4 year pause) to know if
that one
known as peter reveals where the consciousness is resting. In the short time
span of my
return, I have noticed questions directed that way towards Peter and they went
unanswered. This post is the first one I
,
the first man said -- I don't need a teacher. Fool you are, said the second
man. I'm sure
you'll drop dead any moment.
-Bronte
Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Namaste Beautiful ones,
Here's a parable:
There was a man who had heard of this great thing called
Namaste
Thankyou Jeff for your post -
Jyoti took Diksha and was ripe
this was the first time that someone
actually transcended and imploded into
Realization at Diksha. It was great. hahahahahaha
Just gave the last of the mantras and her new name
and said now nyingje no longer remains
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/2/07 12:17:28 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Namaste
Thankyou Jeff for your post -
Jyoti took Diksha and was ripe
this was the first time that someone
actually
Note: 0 = Swami G, The question here is answered by two of the enlightened :
Another question: Not to burst anyone's bubble, but I was just#8232;
wondering if Diksha can
wear off? Or if it is possible to slip back#8232; into an ego after one
reaches realization?
#8232;#8232;0- As long as
Note: 0 = Swami G, The question here is answered by two of the enlightened :
Another question: Not to burst anyone's bubble, but I was just
wondering if Diksha can
wear off? Or if it is possible to slip back into an ego after one
reaches realization?
0- As long as mind does not re-root it is
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Amy Hard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Namaste GuruJ.
OM Namo Narayan -
In response to your post below: Why does the veil of illusion even exist? I
realize it's a
joke, but it seems like a cruel one. :(
0- one got lost in the story and the projections and this is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the soul expands and overshadows the body,
Then you realize you are the energy of the soul,
And you no longer experience yourself, as the body,
But you experience yourself as an energy called 'The Soul'.
In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote
This is for those who never tasted ice cream:
It is sweet, really really creamy, cold, and melts when warmed up -
ok, now do you fully get
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At first, I was very annoyed about the announcement that they intended
to build hundreds of these towers of invincibility around the world, at
several mil a pop, which seemed only to designed to tell Bevan et al
I'm happy that you found reality with a guru that suggest reading
material and meetings for the enlightened to stay enlightened
Ron. Now that's real enlightenment, right ? ;-)
The update in my path here is My Guru said there are 5 that have unfolded in
Realization.
Maybe it is even 6
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives boo_lives@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
There are wild things
taking place with Gurus these days.
The claim from your guru to have brought 5 into enlightenment probably
is the wildest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
I'm happy that you found reality with a guru that suggest
reading
material and meetings for the enlightened to
stay enlightened
Ron. Now
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion, 5 or 8 people enlightened in 8 years isn't an extraordinary
track record. I'm sure there are many gurus who could claim that, but I'm
not sure that there are many who would.
I think it is an area of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ron
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 12:08 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for Nabby
As far
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, andrasayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the source of Nityananda saying that none of his diciples
were enlightened?
My Guru knows someone that was there at the time of his passing. He had said
not one came
that was there for a bigger Me. My guru
HP : Well lemme think, what would be the purpose in knowing or
believeing that my Guru has
brought 5 to enlightenment since 1999. For those interested in a
Guru who may be
available to work with, it would be most useful I would guess.
Nabby: Of course, if it was true. But since it is just a
It is not possible to have a useful discussion with Ron as long as
you cannot even read and understand the simplest of statements.
HP: Well Nabby, we know in advance that there is not going to be a discussion
between us
did not write what you claim, it's not useful for me with
another
. They repeat the
stuff they've been told (and, more often than not, *sold*)
by teachers who told them that they *needed* a teacher to
realize who they are. They go on and on like Ron does
about how a guru is essential, and how doing exactly what
he or she says is essential to become enlightened
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip)
That moment often is referred to by the enlightened as
the pivotal moment in their lives in which the seed of
realization was planted. It may not have actually been
*doing* the Something Else that
Namaste Guru G and Amy,
G :the *you* that you speak of is no more. When *you* is used by
One that is Realized it is only used as a manner of speaking.
The *you* is no more - it belongs to the illusion of maya.
In Lila what dances is that One Singular Essense which is One.
Udit: That's right.
Actually, the guru is only a guide and it has been stated here that one must
walk the path
alone ultimately. This is no way means that while one is with the Guru, the
evolution is not in
full force until one is walking the path on their own but just the opposite.
From that well known verse-
Om Namo Narayan
Sahaja means effortless and continuous -
(not simply the result of being in sitting meditation)
This is rather a continous state of Consciousness versus
an experience that comes and goes.
Sarvikalpa - is still having an identity but it is merged
in Oneness. Being One
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Om Namo Narayan
Sahaja means effortless and continuous -
(not simply the result of being in sitting meditation)
This is rather a continous state
in actuality by now, all the stances of all
the members in
this forum are known and it is not going to change any time soon most likely,
so now what
- do you want a medal?
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote
Namaste all,
Namaste and Grace-filled Evening,
* While reading through the posts a question popped up. In the
realized
state how do you feel about your loved ones?
S There is no sense that the loved one is different than the self
and within this purity, love and compassion flow
0
Namaste - Siddhis come as a matter of course - but development of Siddhis is
not what
the path is about - it is about entering the Best of the Siddhis which is
Realization where all conditioned knowledge is at an end. Siddhis are signposts
along the
way. Maha Shanti OM
(Reply)
ater all these years of doing tm and if regular and sincere with it, I would
submit there is a
good chance that one would move rapidly by taking diksha under the terms
specified
below.
my experience dictates that it is different to have the initiation by the
diciple compared
with the sat
This looks good from what they write:
http://www.siddhyog.org/shaktipat_diksha_-_initiation.htm
The world is as you are. Develop unbounded consciousness and the Universe is
yours
1 - 100 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
