[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-21 Thread Jason Spock



 Creating Israel was a bad idea, a colossal blunder. Both, Israel and Palestine haven't existed for 3000 years. Ever since Nebuchadnezar of Babylon conquered that territory, it has been under foreign rule. Partitioning a state is one of the worst things that can happen. It leads to huge complications.  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:12:06 EDTSubject:
 Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times' You think there would be peace in the middle east if Israel ceased to exist?
		Blab-away for as little as 1ยข/min. Make  PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-19 Thread Richard Hughes






From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday 
Times'
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:16:26 EDT


In a message dated 4/18/06 3:02:26 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:




I doubt if you will find any Arab nation that objected to our involvement 
in
helping the Mujahadeen in ousting the Soviets.

That doesn't make it alright to destroy an entire country.


 Saddam Hussein did not come
to power by the hands of the US. And the US only gave Saddam enough 
military
intelligence, via Satellite to let him know of Iranian troop movements so
the status quo could be maintained.

I've heard a vastly different story there.

 Israel is our ally who we will defend to
the end which is what really pisses middle eastern countries off about
American foreign policy

I disagree, Israel illegally holds onto large swathes of the west bank and 
east jerusalem, it is NOT their land and they treat the rightful owners 
despicably, Who wants allies like that? What pisses off the entire world 
about american foreign policy is the vile hypocrisy.

. However the United States has bent over backwards trying to
reach an agreement to establish a Palestinian homeland even to the tune of
billions of dollars in aid to Palestinian people.

Bent over backwards tricking the palestinians into accepting the situation 
Israel has forced on them you mean.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-19 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/18/06 9:06:27 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However 
  the United States has bent over backwards trying to  reach 
  an agreement to establish a Palestinian homeland even to the tune of 
   billions of dollars in aid to Palestinian 
  people.As compared to how much aid to the Israeli 
  people?

Does the United States owe the Palestinian people a dime? They 
are not our allies and they are represented by terrorist organizations. The fact 
that we deal with them at all and have tried repeatedly to help them organize 
into a nation state and give them billions of dollars to do so is nothing that 
we owe them but we do it inhopes that they will accept a homeland and live 
in peace which is like pissing in the wind.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-19 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/19/06 7:23:22 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I 
  doubt if you will find any Arab nation that objected to our involvement 
  inhelping the Mujahadeen in ousting the Soviets.That 
  doesn't make it alright to destroy an entire 
country.

So, are you blaming the United States for destroying 
Afghanistan? Geez you really are one of the America 
haters.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-19 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/19/06 7:23:22 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Saddam Hussein did not cometo power by the hands of the US. And 
  the US only gave Saddam enough militaryintelligence, via 
  Satellite to let him know of Iranian troop movements sothe 
  status quo could be maintained.I've heard a vastly different story 
  there.

One can read ANYTHING one wants, written by anybody. Doesn't 
make it factual. Kind of like blaming the United States for destroying 
Afghanistan.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-19 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/19/06 7:23:22 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Israel is our ally who we will defend tothe end which is what 
  really pisses middle eastern countries off aboutAmerican foreign 
  policyI disagree, Israel illegally holds onto large swathes of the 
  west bank and east jerusalem, it is NOT their land and they treat the 
  rightful owners despicably, Who wants allies like 
that?

Too bad, they are our allies whether you can accept it or 
not.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-19 Thread Richard Hughes






From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday 
Times'
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:19:27 EDT


In a message dated 4/19/06 7:23:22 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Israel is our ally who we will defend to
 the end which is what really pisses middle eastern countries off about
 American foreign policy

I disagree, Israel illegally holds onto large swathes of the west bank and
east jerusalem, it is NOT their land and they treat the rightful owners
despicably, Who wants allies like that?


Too bad, they are our allies whether you can accept it or not.


No peace in the middle east then.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-19 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/19/06 10:39:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I 
  disagree, Israel illegally holds onto large swathes of the west bank 
  andeast jerusalem, it is NOT their land and they treat the 
  rightful ownersdespicably, Who wants allies like 
  that?Too bad, they are our allies whether you can 
  accept it or not.No peace in the middle east 
  then.

You think there would be peace in the middle east if 
Israel ceased to exist?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-19 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 In a message dated 4/18/06 9:06:27 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 However the United States has bent over 
 backwards trying to 
  reach an agreement to establish a Palestinian homeland even to 
the 
 tune of 
  billions of dollars in aid to Palestinian people.
 
 
 As compared to how much aid to the Israeli people?
 
 
 
 
 
 Does the United States owe the Palestinian people a dime? They are 
not our 
 allies and they are represented by terrorist organizations. The 
fact that we 
 deal with them at all and have tried repeatedly to help them 
organize into a 
 nation state and give them billions of dollars to do so is nothing 
that we owe 
 them but we do it in hopes that they will accept a homeland and 
live in 
 peace which is like pissing in the wind.


As opposed to the Israelis, who took what was aninternational city 
and turned it into a sectarian capital?











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-19 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/19/06 3:15:04 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As 
  opposed to the Israelis, who took what was aninternational city and turned 
  it into a sectarian capital?

Starting a war is risky business. I'm sure the Egyptians, 
Syrians, and Jordanians, didn't expect to lose so quickly and so 
much.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 11:34:28 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  If it is the only way to shut their operation down and prevent  
  them from building their own then so be it.And then you've got 
  your 40,000 maddened suicide bombers,or more, some of them with suitcase 
  nukes, as you andothers keep pointing out. I take it you don't 
  mind if they have their own nuclear arsenal,  do you? I mean 
  everybody else has them, why shouldn't they? Is that where  
  you're coming from?That's too stupid to respond 
to.

Judy the idea is to keep Iran from being in a position where 
they can make nukes and possibly hand them off. I would much rather deal with 
40,000 suicide bombers with C4 explosives than fifteen or twenty 
with suit case or whatever other kind of nukes they can smuggle into a country 
and use. As for the question that was too stupid to respond to I certainly hope 
you don't think it is acceptable for Iran to have a nuclear arsenal, but there 
are people out there that say"if we can have them , why can't they". I am dead 

serious about that . I don't know what you would propose to Iran to persuade 
them to nock it off but I guarantee you thatthere have been far more 
intelligent and informed people than anybody in this forum from all over the 
world that have tried to negotiate in good faith with Iran and obviously have 
not had any success.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/18/06 12:23:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. Their 
  government is elected democratically but with certain controls imposed on 
  it from the clergy. 

Close enough. The Mullahs have the final 
say.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread Richard Hughes



From: anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday 
Times'
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:41:27 -

Hi Richard, Comment Below...

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/
Sunday
  Times'
  Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:55:52 EDT
  
  
  In a message dated 4/16/06 11:54:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
   

I doubt if Mutually Assured Destruction would stop Iran from using
nukes or any other weapons.  Mutually assured destruction is the aim
of suicide bombers, and I get the idea the same mentality pervades
some middle eastern cultures/goverments/nations.

MAD is not the aim of SB's, MAD is ensuring no-one attacks you because they 
know you can annihilate them in return. MAD kept the peace in europe until 
the end of the cold war. Unfortunately that meant all wars between the US  
USSR were fought by proxy in vietnam, afghanistan etc.

In particular president Ahmadinejad, who (some fear) sees
international turmoil as heralding the return of the twelfth imam,
which he believes would bring about peace and justice by establishing
islam throughout the world.  The greater the turmoil or more
destructive the war, the more likely is the return of the imam.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelfth_imam#Reappearance
http://www.newstatesman.com/200512050014
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/15/AR2005121501428.html

  not a great way to live but seeing as Israel has such
  obvious expansionist ambitions it's either that or another US invasion.

Israeli expansionist ambitions?  Can you elaborate?

250,000 Israeli settlers on illegally held land on the West Bank, I doubt 
they will be happy until they have all the land that God gave them from 
the med to the river Jordan. This is a major problem for arabs (and all 
right thinking folk I would say)






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread Richard Hughes



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday 
Times'
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:15:44 EDT


In a message dated 4/17/06 2:53:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

For  nearly a hundred years we have seen the middle east as little
more than a  filling station and knocked off any government that didn't 
want
to play by  our rules. And in those days no-one even complained to the UN
because they  were getting cheap oil too.

You can't keep treating people like this,  If there is such a thing as 
Karma
I would say we are  due!




Up until 911 the only Middle eastern country the US has  any history of
meddling in was Iran it's self. The rest were governments set up  by their 
own
people or the British. Maybe I'm wrong. Can anybody think of  any 
governments that
we or our CIA toppled, other than the government in Iran  that we helped
place the Shaw in power of?




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread Richard Hughes



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday 
Times'
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:15:44 EDT




Up until 911 the only Middle eastern country the US has  any history of
meddling in was Iran it's self. The rest were governments set up  by their 
own
people or the British. Maybe I'm wrong. Can anybody think of  any 
governments that
we or our CIA toppled, other than the government in Iran  that we helped
place the Shaw in power of?

Afghanistan springs to mind, The USSR invaded to prop up the govt, a 
sympathetic gas supplier. The resulting ten year hell left the country in a 
pitiful state controlld by warlords and eventually the taliban. The 
mujahideen were largely trained and organised by the west. ex-cia operative 
Zbigniew Brzeziski claimed that the US destabilisd the country in the first 
place! hoping to trick the USSR into a vietnam style conflict.

Saddam Hussien is another madman helped into power. And supported throughout 
his convenient
war with Iran.

Add the unconditional support of Israel at the expense of the palestinians, 
I think there is enough for some to be pissed off about




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread Richard Hughes



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday 
Times'
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:06:07 EDT


In a message dated 4/17/06 2:30:48 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The best  guess is that now Iran has enriched uranium it will be ten years
before  they have the bomb. Suitcase nukes would require a far higher level
of  technology than that required for a ballistic missile sized  device.



I don't know where you are getting this ten year schedule from

A report in the guardian newspaper, not definitive perhaps but I'm not 
losing sleep, not yet anyway!


but there are
far more estimates giving far fewer years. On the average I have  been
hearing 2 to 3 years. And whether they can develop a suit case size nuke or 
  not
there are ways of smuggling a nuke into just about any country.

I was surprised at 9/11 I always thought they would wait until they had a 
nuke and sail it up the hudson or the thames.


The last  thing
you want to do is wait till they have one or even worse more. Iran has  
already
threatened use of unconventional warfare, terrorism, to get what they  
want.
As far as I'm concerned, we don't have to use conventional warfare either  
to
prevent them carrying out their  threats.

I hope not too. I can't help thinking that might be worse than letting Iran 
have the bomb in the first place.




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 10:22:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 ,  Pakistan and Israel have not  had 
 a 
  reputation of exporting  terrorism although sometimes the Indian 
 government  tries to 
   pin that on Pakistan.
 
 Er, Pakistan was the only country that recognized  the Taliban and 
the 
 Pakistani have certainly been high on the list of  countries 
 sponsoring terrorism.
 
 
 
 
 I think there were some others that recognized the Taliban. 

As far as I recall, the only folk that recognized the Taliban were 
teh Pakistanis.


 Wasn't that one 
 of the reasons for the Dubai port deal falling through, that  they 
recognized 
 the Taliban?

???


 Pakistan is a hot bed of terrorism mainly because  of their 
 tribal areas, not because their government supports it.  er!








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread Robert Gimbel
Encouraging children to commit suicide for some relgious or 
nationalistic cause, has to be considered insane and demonic.
I can't think of too many historical instances of this kind of policy.
It goes against the basis nature of life, in all ways.
In all of the past instances, where this tactic was used, it seems the 
perpertrators always lost; whether it was the Japanese at the end of 
WWII; or the insane suicidal Nazi tactics during the same period.
Does anyone know of an instance, where this demonic tactic of suicide 
has ever achieved anything, other then total defeat?
Seems to me, if you have a group consciousness that's glorifying and 
craving death, then they will attract to them the death they so seek.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/18/06 3:02:26 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Afghanistan springs to mind, The USSR invaded to prop up the govt, a 
  sympathetic gas supplier. The resulting ten year hell left the country in 
  a pitiful state controlld by warlords and eventually the taliban. The 
  mujahideen were largely trained and organised by the west. ex-cia 
  operative Zbigniew Brzeziski claimed that the US destabilisd the country 
  in the first place! hoping to trick the USSR into a vietnam style 
  conflict.Saddam Hussien is another madman helped into power. And 
  supported throughout his "convenient"war with Iran.Add the 
  unconditional support of Israel at the expense of the palestinians, I 
  think there is enough for some to be pissed off 
about

I doubt if you will find any Arab nation that objected to our 
involvement in helping the Mujahadeen in ousting the Soviets.  Saddam 
Hussein did not come to power by the hands of the US. And the US only gave 
Saddam enough military intelligence, via Satelliteto let him know of 
Iranian troop movements so the status quo could be maintained. Israel is our 
ally who we will defend to the end which is what really pisses middle eastern 
countries off about American foreign policy. However the United States has bent 
over backwards trying to reach an agreement to establish a Palestinian homeland 
even to the tune of billions of dollars in aid to Palestinian 
people.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/18/06 11:48:40 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Encouraging children to commit suicide for some relgious or 
  nationalistic cause, has to be considered insane and demonic.I can't 
  think of too many historical instances of this kind of policy.It goes 
  against the basis nature of life, in all ways.In all of the past 
  instances, where this tactic was used, it seems the perpertrators always 
  lost; whether it was the Japanese at the end of WWII; or the insane 
  suicidal Nazi tactics during the same period.Does anyone know of an 
  instance, where this demonic tactic of suicide has ever achieved anything, 
  other then total defeat?Seems to me, if you have a group consciousness 
  that's glorifying and craving death, then they will attract to them the 
  death they so seek.

It's not some mystical karmic thing. It's a last ditch sign of 
desperation. They dead but they just wont lie down.( not intended to be taken as 
some kind of Nosferatu thing).





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-18 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/18/06 3:02:26 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Afghanistan springs to mind, The USSR invaded to prop up the govt, 
a  
 sympathetic gas supplier. The resulting ten year hell left the 
country in  a 
 pitiful state controlld by warlords and eventually the taliban. 
The  
 mujahideen were largely trained and organised by the west. ex-cia  
operative 
 Zbigniew Brzeziski claimed that the US destabilisd the country  in 
the first 
 place! hoping to trick the USSR into a vietnam style  conflict.
 
 Saddam Hussien is another madman helped into power. And  supported 
throughout 
 his convenient
 war with Iran.
 
 Add the  unconditional support of Israel at the expense of the 
palestinians, 
 I  think there is enough for some to be pissed off  about
 
 
 
 I doubt if you will find any Arab nation that objected to our  
involvement in 
 helping the Mujahadeen in ousting the Soviets.  Saddam  Hussein 
did not come 
 to power by the hands of the US. And the US only gave  Saddam 
enough military 
 intelligence, via Satellite to let him know of  Iranian troop 
movements so 
 the status quo could be maintained. Israel is our  ally who we 
will defend to 
 the end which is what really pisses middle eastern  countries off 
about 
 American foreign policy. However the United States has bent  over 
backwards trying to 
 reach an agreement to establish a Palestinian homeland  even to the 
tune of 
 billions of dollars in aid to Palestinian  people.


As compared to how much aid to the Israeli people?








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 4:15:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 It seems  obvious to me that the reason Iran feels
 the need for insurance is to  deter Israel and the
 U.S. from attacking *them*.  Or, absolute worst  case,
 to do a preemptive strike.  That's what all  the
 annihilation talk is about, to discourage us from
 messing with  Iran.
 
 
 
 Nobody ever talked about messing with Iran until they became  hell 
bent on 
 building nuclear bombs. Their insurance has become their  
provocation towards 
 Israel and the west. If all they ever really wanted was  cheap 
nuclear energy 
 for electricity everything could have been worked out. But  it is 
obvious that 
 is not all they wanted, they wanted the ability to enrich  uranium 
so they 
 could make weapons. And nobody in their right minds trusts the  
number 1 
 terrorist supporting country in the world with  nukes.



Er, the neocon agenda for 10 years has been Iraq followed by Iran or 
Syria followed by the other. Where you been?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 4:24:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Er,  suitcase bombs are a tad more difficult to build 
than  Little  Boys...
  
  
  
  
  
  Er  , but is there a reason why they  couldn't?
 
 
 Er, since  suitcase bombs are the end-result of decades of nuclear-
bomb 
 testing, yes,  there is 
 (obviously).
 
 
 
 Er, so the Iranians are starting from scratch? They don't have  the 
benefit 
 of any knowledge or technology that was developed before? So, I  
guess the 
 Iranians must be decades away from developing a suit case nuke 
since  they are 
 doing all this on their own. Let's hope some soviet nuclear 
scientist  didn't 
 sell them the plans to build one. Or they, the Iranians are too 
stupid to  figure 
 it out. Hope is nice.


Building a nuclear weapon means testing it, number one. Number two, 
the PLANS to build a suitcase bomb only work if you have the 
infrastructure in place to use those plans. Suitcase bombs are a heck 
of a lot more sophisticated than a Little Boy, and the Iranians 
aren't ready for building a Little Boy and won't be for at least 2-3 
years according to the worst-case estimates. 






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 4:26:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Well, to  a certain extent, the mere existence of Israel makes Moslem 
 countries feel  
 insecure for many, many reasons.
 
 
 
 Tell us why any Muslim country has to fear  Israel.


I didn't say they had legitimate reason to fear them, but it is 
obvious from the rhetoric that virtually all of them feel 
insecure/resentful about Israel. Part of that is no doubt propoganda to 
keep the peasants focused on an outside threat, and part of that may be 
inbred fear of outsiders on the part of the Arab and/or Moslem culture 
in the Middle East. Other factors no doubt play their part, but to 
suggest that the Moslem COuntries should just grow up or whatever 
you're suggesting is turning a blind eye to recent history.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 9:52:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Does the  phrase axis of evil ring a bell?
 
 
 
 Was that a regime change  policy?

North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Syria, maybe some others? I guess the Taliban 
as well (LOL).







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread Richard Hughes



From: peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday 
Times'
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:40:45 -

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  In a message dated 4/16/06 12:18:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
   And  there are no suitcase nukes.
  
 
  This is the second time you say  this.

I thought nobody noticed the first time!

  How do you know?

Originally I saw a documentary on TV debunking the story as a cold war myth, 
apparently the portable nukes the soviets had, were not all that portable 
and definately all accounted for when dismantled. Tere are plenty of sites 
on the net with the full story.
 
  Were you in charge of the Soviet  nuclear suit case commando and now
  have have them all physically near  yourself and/or did you yourself
  oversee their physical  destruction?

I can neither confirm or deny this rumour.

 
  I ask this without mentioning the innumerable other ways  nuclear
  material may have escaped the former Soviet  Union.
 
  When I referred to suit case nukes I wasn't referring to  Soviet
bombs. It
  seems to me that if Iran can develop it's own Nuclear bombs and
under water
  missiles that travel over 200 miles an hour and are stealth like, is
  there some
  reason over the next few years they couldn't make their own suit
case  size
  nuclear bombs, perfect for handing off to terrorists to plant in the
cities  of
  their choices?

The best guess is that now Iran has enriched uranium it will be ten years 
before they have the bomb. Suitcase nukes would require a far higher level 
of technology than that required for a ballistic missile sized device.

So, nothing to worry about yet, unless you happen to live in the middle east 
of course as Iran will be   bombed/invaded before much longer.

I wonder what would have worse consequences, Iran having the bomb or another 
American invasion




Once the cat is out of the bag, it's  out!

The cat was out of it's bag 60 years ago, I've always thought it only a 
matter of time before some nutter gets hold of one
 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread Richard Hughes



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday 
Times'
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:55:52 EDT


In a message dated 4/16/06 11:54:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 And when Iran can send out 40,000 suicide bombers ,  some  equipped with
 suit
 case size nukes, then   what?

According to reuters there are only 200 suicide volunteers. The  40,000
refered to are new recruits to the revolutionary guard.

And  there are no suitcase nukes.




Yes Richard, and many are saying, why shouldn't Iran have  nukes. One day
they just might and why couldn't they develop suit case size  nuclear bombs 
and
hand them over to any number of these 200 or by then 40,000  recruits?We
stand by and do nothing other than protest to the UN or even  congratulate 
them on
their advances in technology. Funny how the leaders of Iran  are not held
responsible for their rhetoric or their actions while leaders  receiving 
the
threats are held responsible for taking those threats  seriously.

I don't think any country should have them but it's a bit late for that. The 
nature of arms races is such that once Israel armed itself everyone in the 
middle east will. We can only hope that when it finally gets it's hands on 
something really dangerous, Iran will understand the concept of mutually 
assured destruction, not a great way to live but seeing as Israel has such 
obvious expansionist ambitions it's either that or another US invasion.

I would guess though, that the people of Iran have had enough of western 
meddling in their affairs. They don't call us the great satan for nothing 
you know. For nearly a hundred years we have seen the middle east as little 
more than a filling station and knocked off any government that didn't want 
to play by our rules. And in those days no-one even complained to the UN 
because they were getting cheap oil too.

You can't keep treating people like this, If there is such a thing as Karma 
I would say we are due!




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread anonyff
Hi Richard, Comment Below...

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/
Sunday 
 Times'
 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:55:52 EDT
 
 
 In a message dated 4/16/06 11:54:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  
  And when Iran can send out 40,000 suicide bombers ,  some 
equipped with
  suit
  case size nukes, then   what?
 
 According to reuters there are only 200 suicide volunteers. The 
40,000
 refered to are new recruits to the revolutionary guard.
 
 And  there are no suitcase nukes.
 
 Yes Richard, and many are saying, why shouldn't Iran have  nukes.
One day
 they just might and why couldn't they develop suit case size 
nuclear bombs 
 and
 hand them over to any number of these 200 or by then 40,000 
recruits?We
 stand by and do nothing other than protest to the UN or even 
congratulate 
 them on
 their advances in technology. Funny how the leaders of Iran  are
not held
 responsible for their rhetoric or their actions while leaders 
receiving 
 the
 threats are held responsible for taking those threats  seriously.
 
 I don't think any country should have them but it's a bit late for
that. The 
 nature of arms races is such that once Israel armed itself everyone
in the 
 middle east will. We can only hope that when it finally gets it's
hands on 
 something really dangerous, Iran will understand the concept of
mutually 
 assured destruction

I doubt if Mutually Assured Destruction would stop Iran from using
nukes or any other weapons.  Mutually assured destruction is the aim
of suicide bombers, and I get the idea the same mentality pervades
some middle eastern cultures/goverments/nations.

In particular president Ahmadinejad, who (some fear) sees
international turmoil as heralding the return of the twelfth imam,
which he believes would bring about peace and justice by establishing
islam throughout the world.  The greater the turmoil or more
destructive the war, the more likely is the return of the imam.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelfth_imam#Reappearance
http://www.newstatesman.com/200512050014
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/15/AR2005121501428.html

 not a great way to live but seeing as Israel has such 
 obvious expansionist ambitions it's either that or another US invasion.

Israeli expansionist ambitions?  Can you elaborate?

 
 I would guess though, that the people of Iran have had enough of
western 
 meddling in their affairs. They don't call us the great satan for
nothing 
 you know. For nearly a hundred years we have seen the middle east as
little 
 more than a filling station and knocked off any government that
didn't want 
 to play by our rules. And in those days no-one even complained to
the UN 
 because they were getting cheap oil too.
 
 You can't keep treating people like this, If there is such a thing
as Karma 
 I would say we are due!






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread Robert Gimbel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
 wrote:
 
  40,000 suicide bombers, Gimbel, and you couldn't find anything to 
  rhyme with it?
  
 It was a subject far too somber.


Yes, not a good sign;
A scare tactic, but nonetheless, sobering.

But I think knowing this type of thinking is out there;
Can at least begin to diminish it's power;
By bringing consciousness to the insanity of the ego:
In and of itelf can help dissolve the negativity;
The higher and more potent the consciousness;
The greater the power to disolve the insanity, of the ego.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread Richard J. Williams
authfriend wrote: 
 On its face, the likelihood that Iran could actually recruit
 and train 40,000 people who would actually then go out and
 *be* suicide bombers seems unlikely, to say the least.  (Of
 course, even a few who were successful could cause a great
 deal of chaos.)
 
Very impressive. The diplomatic efforts made until now have been 
exhausted, he said, and it is now time for a diplomatic process with 
sharp teeth. How does that work? If diplomatic efforts have been 
exhuasted, how can diplomatic efforts have any teeth? 

Another question: How many suicide bombers did Iran field during the 
Iran-Iraq war? According to what I've read, it was in the millions.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@
  wrote:
  
   40,000 suicide bombers, Gimbel, and you couldn't find anything 
to 
   rhyme with it?
   
  It was a subject far too somber.
 
 
 Yes, not a good sign;
 A scare tactic, but nonetheless, sobering.
 
 But I think knowing this type of thinking is out there;
 Can at least begin to diminish it's power;
 By bringing consciousness to the insanity of the ego:
 In and of itelf can help dissolve the negativity;
 The higher and more potent the consciousness;
 The greater the power to disolve the insanity, of the ego.


Certainly
Nimble Gimbel
You could have
Found a way
To blame Bush 
and Company
For the 40,000
Suicide bombers
and make it rhyme
To boot





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 I doubt if Mutually Assured Destruction would stop Iran from using
 nukes or any other weapons.  Mutually assured destruction is the aim
 of suicide bombers, and I get the idea the same mentality pervades
 some middle eastern cultures/goverments/nations.

Where did you get that idea?  Suicide bombers aren't
after mutually assured destruction; they're making
a sacrifice for a larger cause.  Mutually assured
destruction on a macro scale would eliminate any larger
cause for both sides.

 In particular president Ahmadinejad, who (some fear) sees
 international turmoil as heralding the return of the twelfth imam,
 which he believes would bring about peace and justice by 
establishing
 islam throughout the world.  The greater the turmoil or more
 destructive the war, the more likely is the return of the imam.

Turmoil and the nuclear destruction of an Islamic nation
would be two different things in this view, methinks.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonybliss_ff no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   Where have all the flowers gone, long time passing?
   
   Gone to weapons of mass destruction as reported by US and 
British
   media and intelligence.
   
   When will they ever learn?
  
  Heard an excellent suggestion on Meet the Press yesterday, 
though I 
  don't recall the commentator. He was saying how this bellicose 
  rhetoric was coming from the leadership of Iran, in order to 
shore 
  up their internal support; that the chest beating was being done 
for 
  political purposes inside Iran. And aside from the words, Iran 
has 
  basically done nothing. The commentator continued that if Iran 
  wanted to start a war with Israel or the US, this could be done 
very 
  easily. He suggested that it was incumbent on the US, that 
rather 
  than continuing to inflame the situation, that they treat Iran 
much 
  as an adult would treat a young child hurling insults. That we 
  should take a responsible direction. 
  
  By the way, this inflamatory type of speech towards the US and 
  Israel has been occuring for several decades from such countries 
as 
  Syria, Egypt, Libya and others. It is just that those 
controlling 
  Bush want to try to further secure the oil resources of the 
Middle 
  East by force, and so are deciding to take this rhetoric from 
Iran 
  seriously, in order to provoke war.
 snip  
 +++ That does look like the situation.
 Do we have any way to bring those controlers under democratic
 control or, are we going down the drain?   N.

no crystal ball here, but if similar past events are any indication, 
it will turn out OK. Thanks for meditating, everyone!





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 10:24:59 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Was 
  that a regime change policy?Of course it was."States 
  like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming 
  to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass 
  destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They 
  could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match 
  their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail 
  the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference 
  would be catastrophic. "We will work closely with our coalition to 
  deny terrorists and their state sponsors the materials, technology, and 
  expertise to make and deliver weapons of mass destruction. We will 
  develop and deploy effective missile defenses to protect America and our 
  allies from sudden attack. (Applause.) And all nations should 
  know: America will do what is necessary to ensure our nation's 
  security. "We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side. I 
  will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, 
  as peril draws closer and closer. The United States of America will 
  not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the 
  world's most destructive weapons."--George Bush, State of the 
  Union address, 1/29/02"It's very definitely a clear statement of the 
  president's attitude and it leans -- it seems to me -- toward a policy of 
  telling these governments that if they do not get out of business of 
  terror and developing weapons of mass destruction, they stand at risk of 
  their regimes being deposed forcefully by the United 
  States."--James Woolsey, former CIA director, on PBS "Newshour" 
  1/30/02

In 1998 the president of the United States and the Congress 
set a national policy of regime change for Iraq, not any other country. Iraq is 
and was a totally different situation than Iran. Nobody has threatened Iran with 
regime change as a policy but they were put on notice that spreading terrorism 
and WMD's would not be tolerated. So what does Iran do? They start developing 
their own WMD's , nukes. Like the child that is told not to play in the street 
for it's own safety, and what does it do, but goes out onto the freeway. And now 
Iran has the audacity to threaten the United States and other western 
nations with unconventional warfare tactics, terrorism, If they are prevented 
forcibly fromimplementing their scheme. Iran has never needed a nuclear 
weapon for protection. The Mullahs of Iran should have taken a lesson from 
Kaddhaffi and left well enough alone. But I believe they are counting on 
political resistance from Democrats to prevent Bush from using any force to stop 
them from developing their goal. Again the above paragraphs tie the dangers of 
State sponsored terrorism and WMD's, something Iran was not guilty of. Now that 
they are intent on having both, state sponsored terrorism and WMD's, 
theyput themselves at risk for regime 
change..





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 1:34:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Building 
  a nuclear weapon means testing it, number one. Number two, the PLANS to 
  build a suitcase bomb only work if you have the infrastructure in place to 
  use those plans. Suitcase bombs are a heck of a lot more sophisticated 
  than a Little Boy, and the Iranians aren't ready for building a Little Boy 
  and won't be for at least 2-3 years according to the worst-case estimates. 
  

So you want to wait till they have them until you deal with 
them?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 1:29:54 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er, the 
  neocon agenda for 10 years has been Iraq followed by Iran or Syria 
  followed by the other. Where you been?

Er, the agenda has been a regime change in Iraq followed by 
democracy and hopefully a regime change from within in Iran. The Iranian people 
don't like their government and really would like better relations with the 
west. And hopefully with enough discontent internally they would change their 
own regime. There is even hope for Syria further down the road without violence. 
Er!





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 1:36:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Well, to a certain extent, the mere existence of Israel makes Moslem 
   countries feel  insecure for many, many 
  reasons.Tell us why any Muslim country has 
  to fear Israel.I didn't say they had "legitimate" reason 
  to fear them, but it is obvious from the rhetoric that virtually all of 
  them feel insecure/resentful about Israel. Part of that is no doubt 
  propoganda to keep the peasants focused on an outside threat, and part of 
  that may be inbred fear of outsiders on the part of the Arab and/or Moslem 
  culture in the Middle East. Other factors no doubt play their part, but to 
  suggest that the Moslem COuntries should just grow up or whatever 
  you're suggesting is turning a blind eye to recent 
history.

It certainly didn't hurt Egypt or 
Jordan.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 2:30:48 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The best 
  guess is that now Iran has enriched uranium it will be ten years before 
  they have the bomb. Suitcase nukes would require a far higher level of 
  technology than that required for a ballistic missile sized 
device.

I don't know where you are getting this ten year schedule from 
but there are far more estimates giving far fewer years. On the average I have 
been hearing 2 to 3 years. And whether they can develop a suit case size nuke or 
not there are ways of smuggling a nuke into just about any country. The last 
thing you want to do is wait till they have one or even worse more. Iran has 
already threatened use of unconventional warfare, terrorism, to get what they 
want. As far as I'm concerned, we don't have to use conventional warfare either 
to prevent them carrying out their 
threats.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 2:53:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For 
  nearly a hundred years we have seen the middle east as little more than a 
  filling station and knocked off any government that didn't want to play by 
  our rules. And in those days no-one even complained to the UN because they 
  were getting cheap oil too.You can't keep treating people like this, 
  If there is such a thing as Karma I would say we are 
due!

Up until 911 the onlyMiddle eastern country the US has 
any history of meddling in was Iran it's self. The rest were governments set up 
by their own people or the British. MaybeI'm wrong. Can anybody think of 
any governments that we or our CIA toppled, other than the government in Iran 
that we helped place the Shaw in power of?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 12:54:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another 
  question: How many suicide bombers did Iran field during the Iran-Iraq 
  war? According to what I've read, it was in the 
millions.

Yes and horrific stories of thousands of children being used 
to clear mine fields.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 2:30:48 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 The best  guess is that now Iran has enriched uranium it will be 
ten years 
 before  they have the bomb. Suitcase nukes would require a far 
higher level 
 of  technology than that required for a ballistic missile sized  
device.
 
 
 
 I don't know where you are getting this ten year schedule from  
but there are 
 far more estimates giving far fewer years. On the average I have  
been 
 hearing 2 to 3 years. And whether they can develop a suit case 
size nuke or  not 
 there are ways of smuggling a nuke into just about any country.

This is very similar to the 'story' we had going about the Soviet 
Union, only to find out when they collapsed that they were far more 
interested in protecting themselves than acting as the aggressors in 
a conflict, a role the US has assumed far more often than any other 
country since World War II.

Figure it out: India, Pakistan and Israel have nuclear weapons. The 
US occupies Iraq. Gee, you think Iran is pretty well terrified, and 
trying to do what they can to protect themselves?

Nah, a bunch of irrational 'terrorists', with no commonality in 
thinking or in human nature with the US or other 'civilized' 
countries. 

Dixon, have you ever met anyone from Iran?


 The last  thing 
 you want to do is wait till they have one or even worse more. Iran 
has  already 
 threatened use of unconventional warfare, terrorism, to get what 
they  want. 
 As far as I'm concerned, we don't have to use conventional warfare 
either  to 
 prevent them carrying out their  threats.

Yeah, nuke 'em, but pa-leeze, all you big talkers get out on the 
front lines if you do...





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 2:30:48 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 The best  guess is that now Iran has enriched uranium it will be 
ten years 
 before  they have the bomb. Suitcase nukes would require a far 
higher level 
 of  technology than that required for a ballistic missile sized  
device.
 
 
 
 I don't know where you are getting this ten year schedule from  but 
there are 
 far more estimates giving far fewer years. On the average I have  
been 
 hearing 2 to 3 years. And whether they can develop a suit case size 
nuke or  not 
 there are ways of smuggling a nuke into just about any country. The 
last  thing 
 you want to do is wait till they have one or even worse more. Iran 
has  already 
 threatened use of unconventional warfare, terrorism, to get what 
they  want. 
 As far as I'm concerned, we don't have to use conventional warfare 
either  to 
 prevent them carrying out their  threats.

How is a nuclear strike on Iran going to prevent them
from getting, or convince them not to get, a smuggled
nuke?








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 12:54:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Another  question: How many suicide bombers did Iran field during 
the 
 Iran-Iraq  war? According to what I've read, it was in the  millions.
 
 
 
 Yes and horrific stories of thousands of children being used  to 
clear mine 
 fields.

Yes, it is easier to just bomb the kids and kill 'em like we do. 
Collateral damage, right? Several thousand feet up, denial is easy.
So messy, up close and 'horrific'. 

Give us a break- you are suffering from John Wayne-itis.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 10:24:59 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Was  that a regime change  policy?
 
 Of course it was.
 
 States  like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis 
of 
 evil, arming  to threaten the peace of the world.  By seeking 
weapons 
 of mass  destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing 
danger.  
 They  could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means 
to 
 match  their hatred.  They could attack our allies or attempt to 
 blackmail  the United States.  In any of these cases, the price of 
 indifference  would be catastrophic. 
 
 We will work closely with our coalition to  deny terrorists and 
their 
 state sponsors the materials, technology, and  expertise to make 
and 
 deliver weapons of mass destruction.  We will  develop and deploy 
 effective missile defenses to protect America and our  allies from 
 sudden attack.  (Applause.) And all nations should  know:  America 
 will do what is necessary to ensure our nation's  security. 
 
 We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side.  I  will not 
wait 
 on events, while dangers gather.  I will not stand by,  as peril 
draws 
 closer and closer.  The United States of America will  not permit 
the 
 world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the  world's 
most 
 destructive weapons.
 
 --George Bush, State of the  Union address, 1/29/02
 
 It's very definitely a clear statement of the  president's 
attitude 
 and it leans -- it seems to me -- toward a policy of  telling these 
 governments that if they do not get out of business of  terror and 
 developing weapons of mass destruction, they stand at risk of  
their 
 regimes being deposed forcefully by the United  States.
 
 --James Woolsey, former CIA director, on PBS Newshour  1/30/02
 
 
 
 In 1998 the president of the United States and the Congress  set a 
national 
 policy of regime change for Iraq, not any other country.

Oh, please.

 Iraq is  and was a 
 totally different situation than Iran. Nobody has threatened Iran 
with  regime 
 change as a policy but they were put on notice that spreading 
terrorism  and 
 WMD's would not be tolerated.

Or there would be regime change.

 So what does Iran do? They start developing  their 
 own WMD's , nukes. Like the child that is told not to play in the 
street  for 
 it's own safety, and what does it do, but goes out onto the freeway.

Or the kid whose molester threatens him with death
if he tells somebody, and he goes and tells anyway.

 And now  
 Iran has the audacity  to threaten the United States and other 
western  
 nations with unconventional warfare tactics, terrorism, If they are 
prevented  
 forcibly from implementing their scheme. Iran has never needed a 
nuclear  weapon 
 for protection. The Mullahs of Iran should have taken a lesson 
from  Kaddhaffi 
 and left well enough alone. But I believe they are counting on  
political 
 resistance from Democrats to prevent Bush from using any force to 
stop  them from 
 developing their goal.

It ain't just the Democrats, honey bunch.


 Again the above paragraphs tie the dangers of  State 
 sponsored terrorism and WMD's, something Iran was not guilty of. 
Now that  they 
 are intent on having both, state sponsored terrorism and WMD's,  
they put 
 themselves at risk for regime  change..







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 1:29:54 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Er, the  neocon agenda for 10 years has been Iraq followed by Iran 
or 
 Syria  followed by the other. Where you been?
 
 
 
 
 Er, the agenda has been a regime change in Iraq followed by  
democracy and 
 hopefully a regime change from within in Iran. The Iranian people  
don't like 
 their government and really would like better relations with the  
west. And 
 hopefully with enough discontent internally they would change 
their  own regime.

And you really believe nuking Iran is going to turn
the people *against* their government?






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 1:34:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Building  a nuclear weapon means testing it, number one. Number two, 
 the PLANS to  build a suitcase bomb only work if you have the 
 infrastructure in place to  use those plans. Suitcase bombs are a 
heck 
 of a lot more sophisticated  than a Little Boy, and the Iranians 
 aren't ready for building a Little Boy  and won't be for at least 2-3 
 years according to the worst-case estimates.  
 
 So you want to wait till they have them until you deal with  them?

The point is, there's plenty of time for diplomacy
and creative thinking.

Unfortunately we have fantasists, not creative thinkers,
in the administration these days.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 9:30:26 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Figure 
  it out: India, Pakistan and Israel have nuclear weapons. The US occupies 
  Iraq. Gee, you think Iran is pretty well terrified, and trying to do what 
  they can to protect themselves?Nah, a bunch of irrational 
  'terrorists', with no commonality in thinking or in human nature with the 
  US or other 'civilized' countries. Dixon, have you ever met anyone 
  from Iran?

Yes, I've met people from Iran. What does that have to do with 
anything? It's not the general population of Iran that are the loonies and 
supporting the sponsorship of terrorism. India , Pakistan and Israel have not 
had a reputation of exporting terrorism although sometimes the Indian government 
tries to pin that on Pakistan. As far as Iran fearing our presence in Iraq I 
think that is laughable. One minute the democrats complain we don't have enough 
troops there to do the job and the next they say we have too many and need to 
withdraw them immediately. The Iranian leaders are no fools, they watch American 
politics and know they are perfectly safe from invasion. What Iran fears more 
than anything is a successful democracy as a neighbor. Especially on both 
borders.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 9:30:26 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Figure  it out: India, Pakistan and Israel have nuclear weapons. 
The 
 US occupies  Iraq. Gee, you think Iran is pretty well terrified, 
and 
 trying to do what  they can to protect themselves?
 
 Nah, a bunch of irrational  'terrorists', with no commonality in 
 thinking or in human nature with the  US or other 'civilized' 
 countries. 
 
 Dixon, have you ever met anyone  from Iran?
 
 
 
 Yes, I've met people from Iran. What does that have to do with  
anything? 
 It's not the general population of Iran that are the loonies and  
supporting the 
 sponsorship of terrorism. India , Pakistan and Israel have not  had 
a 
 reputation of exporting terrorism although sometimes the Indian 
government  tries to 
 pin that on Pakistan.

Er, Pakistan was the only country that recognized the Taliban and the 
Pakistani have certainly been high on the list of countries 
sponsoring terrorism.


 As far as Iran fearing our presence in Iraq I  think that 
 is laughable. One minute the democrats complain we don't have 
enough  troops 
 there to do the job and the next they say we have too many and need 
to  
 withdraw them immediately. The Iranian leaders are no fools, they 
watch American  
 politics and know they are perfectly safe from invasion. What Iran 
fears more  
 than anything is a successful democracy as a neighbor. Especially 
on both  
 borders.


Do you think that Iran isn't a Democracy? 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 9:30:26 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Figure  it out: India, Pakistan and Israel have nuclear weapons. 
The 
 US occupies  Iraq. Gee, you think Iran is pretty well terrified, 
and 
 trying to do what  they can to protect themselves?
 
 Nah, a bunch of irrational  'terrorists', with no commonality in 
 thinking or in human nature with the  US or other 'civilized' 
 countries. 
 
 Dixon, have you ever met anyone  from Iran?
 
 
 
 Yes, I've met people from Iran. What does that have to do with  
anything? 
 It's not the general population of Iran that are the loonies and  
supporting the 
 sponsorship of terrorism. 

Maybe it was not well known before, but it is fairly common 
knowledge that the US has actively supported terrorist 
organizations, created fertile conditions for the growth of 
terrorist organizations, and supported governments that have 
sponsored terrorism. And we continue to.

The white horse we rode in on is dead. What we need to be doing now 
responsibly and in a grounded, hard headed way, looking out for our 
own interests, is acting within the family of nations. Cooperatively 
and diplomatically. It is easy to frame the problems we face as 
black and white, 'we are always right and they are always wrong' 
issues. But easy doesn't always equal successful, unfortunately. 

Acting as the superpower renegade will lead only to our demise. 
Trying to solve our problems with brute force will only bring us 
more karma of violence. And suffering for the US from every side.
 
India , Pakistan and Israel have not  had a 
 reputation of exporting terrorism although sometimes the Indian 
government  tries to 
 pin that on Pakistan. As far as Iran fearing our presence in Iraq 
I  think that 
 is laughable. One minute the democrats complain we don't have 
enough  troops 
 there to do the job and the next they say we have too many and 
need to  
 withdraw them immediately. The Iranian leaders are no fools, they 
watch American  
 politics and know they are perfectly safe from invasion. What Iran 
fears more  
 than anything is a successful democracy as a neighbor. Especially 
on both  
 borders.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 9:38:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How is a 
  nuclear strike on Iran going to prevent themfrom getting, or convince them 
  not to get, a smugglednuke?

It may not need to be a nuclear strike. But I would imagine it 
would work much like the Israeli strike against the nuclear facility in Iraq. 
Shut the place down. the only reason anybody has ever mentioned using nukes is 
that it might be necessary to use a more powerful bunker buster to insure the 
bunkers are destroyed. Iran has bragged about their super deep bunkers 
that they believe can withstand a conventional attack. Fortunately, the Iranian 
leaders chose to build their nuclear facilities away from heavily 
populated areas, almost as if they might anticipate the possibility of a strike. 
As for acquiring one from another source? Funny thing is, 
nucleardetonations leave a "finger print" so to speak. They can be traced 
back to the reactor the material came from. Anybody passing off a bomb to Iran 
to use else where would be known 
immediately.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 9:41:27 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, it 
  is easier to just bomb the kids and kill 'em like we do. Collateral 
  damage, right? Several thousand feet up, denial is easy.So messy, up close 
  and 'horrific'. Give us a break- you are suffering from John 
  Wayne-itis.

No, that was Clinton's tactic in Serbia. Bomb from 
thirty thousand feet up and hope you hit a military target. Unfortunately 
most targets were either cardboard tanks or civilians. As for the United States 
military I don't believe any ever intentionally target civilians, children. I 
personally believe they put themselves at much greater risk to avoid hitting 
civilians but when their enemy hides among civilians dressed in civilian clothes 
accidents happen.Maybe you can name a major military action in which 
civilians were not killed. Or maybe you should compare how many have been killed 
in Europe and Asia in WW2.Any civilian death in Iraq or Afghanistan is a 
far cry from Iran lining thousands of children up to walk across a mine field in 
front of their soldiers. If you can't see the difference, I'm 
sorry.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 9:38:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 How is a  nuclear strike on Iran going to prevent them
 from getting, or convince them  not to get, a smuggled
 nuke?
 
 
 
 It may not need to be a nuclear strike. But I would imagine it  
would work 
 much like the Israeli strike against the nuclear facility in Iraq.  
Shut the 
 place down. the only reason anybody has ever mentioned using nukes 
is  that it 
 might be necessary to use a more powerful bunker buster to insure 
the  bunkers 
 are destroyed. Iran has bragged about  their super deep bunkers  
that they 
 believe can withstand a conventional attack. Fortunately, the 
Iranian  leaders  
 chose to build their nuclear facilities away from heavily  
populated areas, 
 almost as if they might anticipate the possibility of a strike.  As 
for acquiring 
 one from another source? Funny thing is,  nuclear detonations leave 
a finger 
 print so to speak. They can be traced  back to the reactor the 
material came 
 from. Anybody passing off a bomb to Iran  to use else where would 
be known  
 immediately.

Let me ask it another way:

How is a  nuclear strike on Iran going to prevent them
from getting, or convince them  not to get, a smuggled
nuke?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 9:41:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what 
  does Iran do? They start developing their  own WMD's , nukes. 
  Like the child that is told not to play in the street for  
  it's own safety, and what does it do, but goes out onto the freeway.Or 
  the kid whose molester threatens him with deathif he tells somebody, and 
  he goes and tells anyway.

The United States has been molesting Iran? Since when? We have 
had a pretty much hands off policy with Iran since we broke relations with them. 
We have been completely aware of their state sponsorship of terrorism yet we 
have left them alone. However they have been warned not to mix their terrorism 
with WMD's because THAT will be a reason for regime 
change.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 9:41:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I 
  believe they are counting on political  resistance from 
  Democrats to prevent Bush from using any force to stop them from 
   developing their goal.It ain't just the Democrats, honey 
  bunch.

Sorry, I didn't mean to leave out the socialists as well. I 
usually consider them the same.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 9:41:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Iraq 
  is and was a  totally different situation than Iran. Nobody has 
  threatened Iran with regime  change as a policy but they 
  were put on notice that spreading terrorism and  WMD's would 
  not be tolerated.Or there would be regime 
change.

Only if they mixed the pursuit of WMD's and state sponsored 
terrorism. Can you see the difference?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 9:42:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er, the 
  agenda has been a regime change in Iraq followed by democracy and 
   hopefully a regime change from within in Iran. The Iranian 
  people don't like  their government and really would like 
  better relations with the west. And  hopefully with enough 
  discontent internally they would change their own regime.And 
  you really believe nuking Iran is going to turnthe people *against* their 
  government?

that's doubtful. But it might be an only and last option. If 
it is the only way to shut their operation down and prevent them from building 
their own then so be it. I take it you don't mind if they have their own nuclear 
arsenal, do you? I mean everybody else has them, why shouldn't they? Is that 
where you're coming from?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 9:41:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  So what  does Iran do? They start developing  their 
  own WMD's , nukes.  Like the child that is told not to play in
  the street  for it's own safety, and what does it do, but goes 
  out onto the freeway.
 
 Or  the kid whose molester threatens him with death
 if he tells somebody, and  he goes and tells anyway.
 
 The United States has been molesting Iran?

Iran thinks so.

What you people don't seem to get is that you *have
to take Iran's perspective into account*.  That doesn't
mean accepting it as *valid*, but rather realizing that
it plays a major role in what actually happens.

If it sees itself as a molested child doing whatever it
can to protect itself, you have to *recognize* that and
do something to make it feel *safe*, instead of doing
exactly what it fears most.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 9:41:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 But I  believe they are counting on  
 political 
  resistance from  Democrats to prevent Bush from using any force 
to 
 stop  them from  
  developing their goal.
 
 It ain't just the Democrats, honey  bunch.
 
 Sorry, I didn't mean to leave out the socialists as well. I  
 usually consider them the same.

Not talking about just the United States here.

Jeez, talk about tunnel vision!







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 9:41:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Iraq  is  and was a 
  totally different situation than Iran. Nobody has  threatened 
Iran 
 with  regime 
  change as a policy but they  were put on notice that spreading 
 terrorism  and 
  WMD's would  not be tolerated.
 
 Or there would be regime  change.
 
 Only if they mixed the pursuit of WMD's and state sponsored
 terrorism. Can you see the difference?

Difference from *what*?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 9:42:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Er, the  agenda has been a regime change in Iraq followed by  
 democracy and  
  hopefully a regime change from within in Iran. The Iranian  
people  
 don't like 
  their government and really would like  better relations with 
the  
 west. And 
  hopefully with enough  discontent internally they would change 
 their  own regime.
 
 And  you really believe nuking Iran is going to turn
 the people *against* their  government?
 
 that's doubtful. But it might be an only and last option.

It isn't an option if there's no chance of its working.

 If  it is the only way to shut their operation down and prevent 
 them from building  their own then so be it.

And then you've got your 40,000 maddened suicide bombers,
or more, some of them with suitcase nukes, as you and
others keep pointing out.

 I take it you don't mind if they have their own nuclear  arsenal, 
 do you? I mean everybody else has them, why shouldn't they? Is 
that  where 
 you're coming from?

That's too stupid to respond to.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 9:45:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So you 
  want to wait till they have them until you deal with them?The 
  point is, there's plenty of time for diplomacyand creative 
  thinking.Unfortunately we have fantasists, not creative 
  thinkers,in the administration these days.

The point is we don't have as much time as we used to. We, 
that includes Europe,have been trying to deal and negotiate with Iran for 
years now concerning this matter. It's not just the United States that has tried 
working with Iran. As a matter of fact the Administration has at times taken a 
back seat to allow other European nations including Russia to work out a deal 
for them to have nuclear energy without the riskof them developing a 
nuclear arsenal. So if there is a lack of creativity, it's not just on the part 
of the United States. It's everybody's problem. What has become apparent is that 
Iran has not negotiated for nuclear energy in good faith but really does want an 
arsenal and they are stalling on any negotiations until they have 
it.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 10:22:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
, 
  Pakistan and Israel have not had a  reputation of exporting 
  terrorism although sometimes the Indian government tries to  
  pin that on Pakistan.Er, Pakistan was the only country that recognized 
  the Taliban and the Pakistani have certainly been high on the list of 
  countries sponsoring terrorism.

I think there were some others that recognized the Taliban. 
Wasn't that one of the reasons for the Dubai port deal falling through, that 
they recognized the Taliban? Pakistan is a hot bed of terrorism mainly because 
of their tribal areas, not because their government supports it. 
er!





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 10:22:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you 
  think that Iran isn't a Democracy? 

I believe Iran is considered a theocracy. The mullahs have 
first say in anything. They allow the election of a parliament, but they 
maintain control.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 10:37:09 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 
  white horse we rode in on is dead. What we need to be doing now 
  responsibly and in a grounded, hard headed way, looking out for our 
  own interests, is acting within the family of nations. Cooperatively 
  and diplomatically. It is easy to frame the problems we face as black 
  and white, 'we are always right and they are always wrong' issues. But 
  easy doesn't always equal successful, unfortunately. 


I don't know what you think we have been doing for so many 
years now with Iran. It has not just been the concern of the United States or 
Israel that Iran not have a nuclear arsenal, it has been all of Europe as well. 
They have been the ones pushing for negotiations and doing the negotiating, Bush 
has set back and let them talk till they are blue in the face and when Europeans 
ask us to get more involved we do at their request. It's not just the United 
States that has talked tuff with Iran if you will recall Chirac made a statement 
that appeared on the front page of just about every world wide news paper that 
France would not hesitate to retaliate with nukes if any terrorist group set one 
off in France. As I recall that was a direct threat to Iran. I don't get for one 
minute where anybody on this list thinks anybody is trying to rush in and bomb 
the hell out of Iran. However there will come a point at which we either let 
Iran have a nuclear arsenal or we stop it by force. Unless Iran has a major 
awakening before.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/17/06 10:22:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Do you  think that Iran isn't a Democracy? 
 
 
 
 
 I believe Iran is considered a theocracy. The mullahs have  first 
say in 
 anything. They allow the election of a parliament, but they  
maintain control.


The CIA counts it as an Islamic Republic. Their government is elected 
democratically but with certain controls imposed on it from the 
clergy. They even allow non-Moslems to hold elected office in the 
parliament, although not more than 5%. However, that 5% is enough to 
have influence in a close vote.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 11:28:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 The 
  United States has been molesting Iran?Iran thinks so.What you 
  people don't seem to get is that you *haveto take Iran's perspective into 
  account*. That doesn'tmean accepting it as *valid*, but rather 
  realizing thatit plays a major role in what actually happens.If it 
  sees itself as a molested child doing whatever itcan to protect itself, 
  you have to *recognize* that anddo something to make it feel *safe*, 
  instead of doingexactly what it fears 
most.

I understand your point but disagree with it. I don't think 
Iran feels molested by the US. I think they still feel emboldened by the 
humiliation they inflictedwith the hostage situation. Quite frankly I 
think Iran is seeking a nuclear arsenal in which they will useto destroy 
Israel. That doesn't mean they would actually have to attack Israel with their 
arsenal either.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 11:30:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It ain't 
  just the Democrats, honey bunch.  Sorry, I didn't mean 
  to leave out the socialists as well. I  usually consider them 
  the same.Not talking about just the United States here.Jeez, 
  talk about tunnel vision!

I knew exactly what you meant. Socialism is a world wide 
movement 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/17/06 11:30:45 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Difference from *what*?

Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism without nukes and Iran as 
a state sponsor of terrorism with nukes.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread anonybliss_ff
Where have all the flowers gone, long time passing?

Gone to weapons of mass destruction as reported by US and British
media and intelligence.

When will they ever learn?



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

  Apr. 16, 2006 2:39 | Updated Apr. 16, 2006 11:02
 Report: Iran has readied suicide 'army'
 By JPOST STAFF, YAAKOV KATZ AND HERB KEINON
   
 
   Talkbacks for this article: 21
   Iran has readied an army of 40,000 suicide bombers to strike
targets all over the Western world and Israel as a response to a
possible attack on their nuclear facilities, the British Sunday Times
reported Sunday morning.  






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 9:13:59 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Iran has readied an "army" of 40,000 suicide bombers 
  to striketargets all over the Western world and Israel as a response to 
  apossible attack on their nuclear facilities, the British Sunday 
  Timesreported Sunday morning. 

And when Iran can send out 40,000 suicide bombers , some 
equipped with suit case size nukes, then 
what?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonybliss_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Where have all the flowers gone, long time passing?
 
 Gone to weapons of mass destruction as reported by US and British
 media and intelligence.
 
 When will they ever learn?

Heard an excellent suggestion on Meet the Press yesterday, though I 
don't recall the commentator. He was saying how this bellicose 
rhetoric was coming from the leadership of Iran, in order to shore 
up their internal support; that the chest beating was being done for 
political purposes inside Iran. And aside from the words, Iran has 
basically done nothing. The commentator continued that if Iran 
wanted to start a war with Israel or the US, this could be done very 
easily. He suggested that it was incumbent on the US, that rather 
than continuing to inflame the situation, that they treat Iran much 
as an adult would treat a young child hurling insults. That we 
should take a responsible direction. 

By the way, this inflamatory type of speech towards the US and 
Israel has been occuring for several decades from such countries as 
Syria, Egypt, Libya and others. It is just that those controlling 
Bush want to try to further secure the oil resources of the Middle 
East by force, and so are deciding to take this rhetoric from Iran 
seriously, in order to provoke war.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@
 wrote:
 
   Apr. 16, 2006 2:39 | Updated Apr. 16, 2006 11:02
  Report: Iran has readied suicide 'army'
  By JPOST STAFF, YAAKOV KATZ AND HERB KEINON

  
Talkbacks for this article: 21
Iran has readied an army of 40,000 suicide bombers to strike
 targets all over the Western world and Israel as a response to a
 possible attack on their nuclear facilities, the British Sunday 
Times
 reported Sunday morning.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 9:13:59 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
Iran has readied an army of 40,000 suicide bombers  to strike
 targets all over the Western world and Israel as a response to  a
 possible attack on their nuclear facilities, the British Sunday  
Times
 reported Sunday morning.  
 
 
 
 
 And when Iran can send out 40,000 suicide bombers , some  equipped 
with suit 
 case size nukes, then  what?

We should stop being led around by the nose, manipulated by Bush and 
his cronies. It will only lead to destruction, and further hardship 
world-wide. If Bush and Co can't act like responsible adults, the 
rest of us should.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread Nelson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonybliss_ff no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  Where have all the flowers gone, long time passing?
  
  Gone to weapons of mass destruction as reported by US and British
  media and intelligence.
  
  When will they ever learn?
 
 Heard an excellent suggestion on Meet the Press yesterday, though I 
 don't recall the commentator. He was saying how this bellicose 
 rhetoric was coming from the leadership of Iran, in order to shore 
 up their internal support; that the chest beating was being done for 
 political purposes inside Iran. And aside from the words, Iran has 
 basically done nothing. The commentator continued that if Iran 
 wanted to start a war with Israel or the US, this could be done very 
 easily. He suggested that it was incumbent on the US, that rather 
 than continuing to inflame the situation, that they treat Iran much 
 as an adult would treat a young child hurling insults. That we 
 should take a responsible direction. 
 
 By the way, this inflamatory type of speech towards the US and 
 Israel has been occuring for several decades from such countries as 
 Syria, Egypt, Libya and others. It is just that those controlling 
 Bush want to try to further secure the oil resources of the Middle 
 East by force, and so are deciding to take this rhetoric from Iran 
 seriously, in order to provoke war.
snip  
+++ That does look like the situation.
Do we have any way to bring those controlers under democratic
control or, are we going down the drain?   N.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread Nelson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
 
   
  In a message dated 4/16/06 9:13:59 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
 Iran has readied an army of 40,000 suicide bombers  to strike
  targets all over the Western world and Israel as a response to  a
  possible attack on their nuclear facilities, the British Sunday  
 Times
  reported Sunday morning.  
  
  
  
  
  And when Iran can send out 40,000 suicide bombers , some  equipped 
 with suit 
  case size nukes, then  what?
 
 We should stop being led around by the nose, manipulated by Bush and 
 his cronies. It will only lead to destruction, and further hardship 
 world-wide. If Bush and Co can't act like responsible adults, the 
 rest of us should.

+++ It looks like the problem is a few layers of the onion deeper than
king george and co.
With the election process being proved unreliable, getting to the
deeper levels looks like a hard sell.  N.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

  Apr. 16, 2006 2:39 | Updated Apr. 16, 2006 11:02
 Report: Iran has readied suicide 'army'
 By JPOST STAFF, YAAKOV KATZ AND HERB KEINON
   
 
   Talkbacks for this article: 21
   Iran has readied an army of 40,000 suicide bombers to strike 
 targets all over the Western world and Israel as a response to a 
 possible attack on their nuclear facilities, the British Sunday 
 Times reported Sunday morning.   Two senior officials from the 
 Homeland Security Agency, who spoke on condition of anonymity, 
 agreed with the prediction and warned that Iran could set a 
 worldwide terror network into motion in the US and elsewhere.

I checked this out on the Web.  It's actually not a new
story; the 40,000 figure was being tossed around last
year.  Iran has apparently been recruiting suicide bombers,
but how many have actually been readied is another issue.
From what I've been able to glean, the figure includes
folks who have signed up on the Internet, for example.  And
of course even that is unverifiable.

On its face, the likelihood that Iran could actually recruit
and train 40,000 people who would actually then go out and
*be* suicide bombers seems unlikely, to say the least.  (Of
course, even a few who were successful could cause a great
deal of chaos.)









   They added that an attack on Iran would be much more dangerous to 
the US than was the strike on Iraq.   The Sunday Times also procured 
a tape of Dr. Hassan Abasi, head of the Iranian Center for Strategic 
Studies. He warned that Iran was ready to strike sensitive American 
and British targets if its nuclear facilities were to be attacked.   
With projections that Iran could develop a nuclear bomb within the 
next two-and-a-half years, a high-ranking IDF officer from Military 
Intelligence told The Jerusalem Post over the weekend that the
  successful enrichment of uranium announced last week proved that 
diplomatic efforts to stop Teheran's race to the bomb had 
failed.   The way it looks now, it is doubtful that the United 
Nations and the international efforts will succeed in stopping Iran, 
the high-ranking officer said. Iran spit in the world's face but the 
world hasn't done anything.   On Friday Iranian President Mahmoud 
Ahmadinejad fired a series of verbal shots at Israel, saying it was 
a permanent threat to the Middle East that will soon be 
liberated, and questioning the validity of the Holocaust.   Like it 
or not, the Zionist regime is heading toward annihilation, 
Ahmadinejad said at the opening of a three-day conference in support 
of the Palestinians attended by Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal and other 
Hamas members. The Zionist regime is a rotten, dried tree that will 
be eliminated by one storm, he said.   Although Israel had no 
official response to Ahmadinejad, Shimon Peres said that the
  Iranian president's words were reminiscent of those of Saddam 
Hussein, and that his end will be similar.   Peres issued a 
statement saying that Ahmadinejad represents Satan, and not God. 
History, he said, has denounced madmen and those who wave the sword, 
and all those who acted this way ended their careers accordingly.   
With that, Peres said that Israel needed to let the US and the 
international community lead the campaign to protect the world from 
the Iranian leader.   In an Israel Radio interview, Peres said 
Saturday that Iran is a United Nations member state threatening 
another UN member state, and the international organization will not 
let this go unheeded.   The Iranian president is uniting the entire 
world against him, he said. Israel is following his statements and 
actions closely, but does not wish to respond to them.   Indeed, the 
Foreign Ministry had no response Saturday night to Ahmadinejad's 
comments.   On Tuesday, Ahmadinejad announced that Iran
  had passed one of the major hurdles in its race to obtain nuclear 
power and had, for the first time, successfully enriched uranium.   
But while only a battery of 164 centrifuges was used to enrich the 
uranium to 3.5 percent, according to the IDF officer it was only a 
matter of time before Iran obtained technology allowing for the 
operation of thousands of centrifuges over a period of several months 
which could produce highly-enriched uranium at 90% - the amount 
needed for a nuclear bomb.   The officer noted that Iran was in the 
process of developing nuclear arms in a separate program run parallel 
and alongside the Islamic republic's publicly-known and claimed-to-be 
civilian nuclear program.
   It is more probable that they have a second and secret plan [to 
develop nuclear arms] and they will copy the technology they are now 
developing in the open and use it in a secret location, the officer 
said.   Iran, the officer predicted, would obtain independent 
research and development capabilities - sometimes referred to as 
the point of no return - in a matter of 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread Richard Hughes



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday 
Times'
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 11:18:29 EDT


In a message dated 4/16/06 9:13:59 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Iran has readied an army of 40,000 suicide bombers  to strike
targets all over the Western world and Israel as a response to  a
possible attack on their nuclear facilities, the British Sunday  Times
reported Sunday morning.




And when Iran can send out 40,000 suicide bombers , some  equipped with 
suit
case size nukes, then  what?

According to reuters there are only 200 suicide volunteers. The 40,000 
refered to are new recruits to the revolutionary guard.

And there are no suitcase nukes.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[snip]
 
 And there are no suitcase nukes.


This is the second time you say this. 

How do you know? 

Were you in charge of the Soviet nuclear suit case commando and now
have have them all physically near yourself and/or did you yourself
oversee their physical destruction?
 
I ask this without mentioning the innumerable other ways nuclear
material may have escaped the former Soviet Union.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 11:05:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is 
  just that those controlling Bush want to try to further secure the oil 
  resources of the Middle East by force, and so are deciding to take this 
  rhetoric from Iran seriously, in order to provoke 
war.

Of course, it's all Bush's 
fault.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 11:54:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And when Iran can send out 40,000 suicide bombers , 
  some equipped with suitcase size nukes, then 
  what?According to reuters there are "only" 200 suicide volunteers. The 
  40,000 refered to are new recruits to the revolutionary guard.And 
  there are no suitcase nukes.

Yes Richard, and many are saying," why shouldn't Iran have 
nukes". One day they just might and why couldn't they develop suit case size 
nuclear bombs and hand them over to any number of these 200 or by then 40,000 
recruits?We stand by and do nothing other than protest to the UN or even 
congratulate them on their advances in technology. Funny how the leaders of Iran 
are not held responsible for their rhetoric or their actions while leaders 
receiving the threats are held responsible for taking those threats 
seriously.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 12:18:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 And 
  there are no suitcase nukes.This is the second time you say 
  this. How do you know? Were you in charge of the Soviet 
  nuclear suit case commando and nowhave have them all physically near 
  yourself and/or did you yourselfoversee their physical 
  destruction?I ask this without mentioning the innumerable other ways 
  nuclearmaterial may have escaped the former Soviet 
Union.

When I referred to suit case nukes I wasn't referring to 
Soviet bombs. It seems to me that if Iran can develop it's own Nuclear bombs and 
under water missiles that travel over 200 miles an hour and are stealth like, is 
there some reason over the next few years they couldn't make their own suit case 
size nuclear bombs, perfect for handing off to terrorists to plant in the cities 
of their choices? Once the cat is out of the bag, it's 
out!





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard Hughes
 richardhughes103@ wrote:
 
 [snip]
  
  And there are no suitcase nukes.
 
 
 This is the second time you say this. 
 
 How do you know? 
 
 Were you in charge of the Soviet nuclear suit case commando and now
 have have them all physically near yourself and/or did you yourself
 oversee their physical destruction?
  
 I ask this without mentioning the innumerable other ways nuclear
 material may have escaped the former Soviet Union.


Not to mention the missing stuff from the US inventories (just being an equal 
opportunity 
bitch here).





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 12:18:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  And  there are no suitcase nukes.
 
 
 This is the second time you say  this. 
 
 How do you know? 
 
 Were you in charge of the Soviet  nuclear suit case commando and now
 have have them all physically near  yourself and/or did you yourself
 oversee their physical  destruction?
 
 I ask this without mentioning the innumerable other ways  nuclear
 material may have escaped the former Soviet  Union.
 
 
 
 
 When I referred to suit case nukes I wasn't referring to  Soviet bombs. It 
 seems to me that if Iran can develop it's own Nuclear bombs and  under water 
 missiles that travel over 200 miles an hour and are stealth like, is  there 
 some 
 reason over the next few years they couldn't make their own suit case  size 
 nuclear bombs, perfect for handing off to terrorists to plant in the cities  
 of 
 their choices? Once the cat is out of the bag, it's  out!



Er, suitcase bombs are a tad more difficult to build than Little Boys...








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 12:18:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  And  there are no suitcase nukes.
 
 
 This is the second time you say  this. 
 
 How do you know? 
 
 Were you in charge of the Soviet  nuclear suit case commando and now
 have have them all physically near  yourself and/or did you yourself
 oversee their physical  destruction?
 
 I ask this without mentioning the innumerable other ways  nuclear
 material may have escaped the former Soviet  Union.
 
 
 
 
 When I referred to suit case nukes I wasn't referring to  Soviet
bombs. It 
 seems to me that if Iran can develop it's own Nuclear bombs and 
under water 
 missiles that travel over 200 miles an hour and are stealth like, is
 there some 
 reason over the next few years they couldn't make their own suit
case  size 
 nuclear bombs, perfect for handing off to terrorists to plant in the
cities  of 
 their choices? Once the cat is out of the bag, it's  out!


My proposal was that before Iran resumed the rhetoric of annihilating
Israel, they had already gotten their hand on a piece of nuclear
insurance.

As far as the shkval torpedoes concern they are reported to be sold by
the russians (and be of the same make that  made a US submarine
commander in 2000 panic and sink the Kursk).







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip
 My proposal was that before Iran resumed the rhetoric of
 annihilating Israel, they had already gotten their hand on a piece 
 of nuclear insurance.

And I ask again: If the U.S. and/or Israel were to 
bomb Iran's nuclear facilities out of existence, you
believe that will stop Iran from using its nuclear
insurance?

Because it would seem to me that if Iran does indeed
have such nuclear insurance, our best bet, and
Israel's, would be to see to it that we don't give
them a reason to use it.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ 
 wrote:
 snip
  My proposal was that before Iran resumed the rhetoric of
  annihilating Israel, they had already gotten their hand on a piece 
  of nuclear insurance.
 
 And I ask again: If the U.S. and/or Israel were to 
 bomb Iran's nuclear facilities out of existence, you
 believe that will stop Iran from using its nuclear
 insurance?
 
 Because it would seem to me that if Iran does indeed
 have such nuclear insurance, our best bet, and
 Israel's, would be to see to it that we don't give
 them a reason to use it.


Give it up Judith, just let it go..

 






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ 
  wrote:
  snip
   My proposal was that before Iran resumed the rhetoric of
   annihilating Israel, they had already gotten their hand on a 
piece 
   of nuclear insurance.
  
  And I ask again: If the U.S. and/or Israel were to 
  bomb Iran's nuclear facilities out of existence, you
  believe that will stop Iran from using its nuclear
  insurance?
  
  Because it would seem to me that if Iran does indeed
  have such nuclear insurance, our best bet, and
  Israel's, would be to see to it that we don't give
  them a reason to use it.
 
 
 Give it up Judith, just let it go..

Still can't answer, huh?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 3:33:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er, 
  suitcase bombs are a tad more difficult to build than "Little 
  Boys"...

Er , but is there a reason why they 
couldn't?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 3:57:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because 
  it would seem to me that if Iran does indeed  have such "nuclear 
  insurance," our best bet, and  Israel's, would be to see to it 
  that we don't give  them a reason to use it.  
   Give it up Judith, just let it go..Still can't answer, 
  huh?

Do we need to give them a reason to use it? Isn't the 
existence of Israel reason enough? So we hold off provoking them until they have 
two pieces of insurance or three pieces or four 
or.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 3:57:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Because  it would seem to me that if Iran does indeed
   have such nuclear  insurance, our best bet, and
   Israel's, would be to see to it  that we don't give
   them a reason to use it.
   
  Give it up Judith, just let it go..
 
 Still can't answer,  huh?
 
 Do we need to give them a reason to use it? Isn't the  existence of
 Israel reason enough?

It seems obvious to me that the reason Iran feels
the need for insurance is to deter Israel and the
U.S. from attacking *them*.  Or, absolute worst case,
to do a preemptive strike.  That's what all the
annihilation talk is about, to discourage us from
messing with Iran.

But if Iran no longer had reason to believe we would
attack them, they would no longer need a deterrent.

 So we hold off provoking them until they have  two pieces of 
 insurance or three pieces or four  or.

Why would they go to such trouble if they felt
secure?






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 3:33:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Er,  suitcase bombs are a tad more difficult to build than Little  Boys...
 
 
 
 
 
 Er , but is there a reason why they  couldn't?


Er, since suitcase bombs are the end-result of decades of nuclear-bomb testing, 
yes, there is 
(obviously).






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
 
   
  In a message dated 4/16/06 3:57:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
  jstein@ writes:
  
  Because  it would seem to me that if Iran does indeed
have such nuclear  insurance, our best bet, and
Israel's, would be to see to it  that we don't give
them a reason to use it.

   Give it up Judith, just let it go..
  
  Still can't answer,  huh?
  
  Do we need to give them a reason to use it? Isn't the  existence of
  Israel reason enough?
 
 It seems obvious to me that the reason Iran feels
 the need for insurance is to deter Israel and the
 U.S. from attacking *them*.  Or, absolute worst case,
 to do a preemptive strike.  That's what all the
 annihilation talk is about, to discourage us from
 messing with Iran.
 
 But if Iran no longer had reason to believe we would
 attack them, they would no longer need a deterrent.
 
  So we hold off provoking them until they have  two pieces of 
  insurance or three pieces or four  or.
 
 Why would they go to such trouble if they felt
 secure?


Well, to a certain extent, the mere existence of Israel makes Moslem countries 
feel 
insecure for many, many reasons.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ 
   wrote:
   snip
My proposal was that before Iran resumed the rhetoric of
annihilating Israel, they had already gotten their hand on a 
 piece 
of nuclear insurance.
   
   And I ask again: If the U.S. and/or Israel were to 
   bomb Iran's nuclear facilities out of existence, you
   believe that will stop Iran from using its nuclear
   insurance?
   
   Because it would seem to me that if Iran does indeed
   have such nuclear insurance, our best bet, and
   Israel's, would be to see to it that we don't give
   them a reason to use it.
  
  
  Give it up Judith, just let it go..
 
 Still can't answer, huh?


As I've said in a previous posting - exchanging messgaes with you
serve no meaningful purpose.

You are hereby informed that a rule is in place which deletes  all
messages with your signature.
 
Sorry. You brought it on yourself :-)






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz 
peterklutz@ 
wrote:
snip
 My proposal was that before Iran resumed the rhetoric of
 annihilating Israel, they had already gotten their hand on 
a 
  piece 
 of nuclear insurance.

And I ask again: If the U.S. and/or Israel were to 
bomb Iran's nuclear facilities out of existence, you
believe that will stop Iran from using its nuclear
insurance?

Because it would seem to me that if Iran does indeed
have such nuclear insurance, our best bet, and
Israel's, would be to see to it that we don't give
them a reason to use it.
   
   
   Give it up Judith, just let it go..
  
  Still can't answer, huh?
 
 As I've said in a previous posting - exchanging messgaes with you
 serve no meaningful purpose.

You've never actually *tried* to have an exchange,
you know.

 You are hereby informed that a rule is in place which deletes  all
 messages with your signature.
  
 Sorry. You brought it on yourself :-)

Many thanks.  Now I can comment on your posts without
making myself a target of your insults.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 4:15:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems 
  obvious to me that the reason Iran feelsthe need for "insurance" is to 
  deter Israel and theU.S. from attacking *them*. Or, absolute worst 
  case,to do a preemptive strike. That's what all 
  the"annihilation" talk is about, to discourage us frommessing with 
  Iran.

Nobody ever talked about messing with Iran until they became 
hell bent on building nuclear bombs. Their "insurance" has become their 
provocation towards Israel and the west. If all they ever really wanted was 
cheap nuclear energy for electricity everything could have been worked out. But 
it is obvious that is not all they wanted, they wanted the ability to enrich 
uranium so they could make weapons. And nobody in their right minds trusts the 
number 1 terrorist supporting country in the world with 
nukes.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 4:24:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er, suitcase bombs are a tad more difficult to build than 
  "Little Boys"...  Er 
  , but is there a reason why they couldn't?Er, since 
  suitcase bombs are the end-result of decades of nuclear-bomb testing, yes, 
  there is (obviously).

Er, so the Iranians are starting from scratch? They don't have 
the benefit of any knowledge or technology that was developed before? So, I 
guess the Iranians must be decades away from developing a suit case nuke since 
they are doing all this on their own. Let's hope some soviet nuclear scientist 
didn't sell them the plans to build one. Or they, the Iranians are too stupid to 
figure it out. Hope is nice.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 4:26:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, to 
  a certain extent, the mere existence of Israel makes Moslem countries feel 
  insecure for many, many reasons.

Tell us why any Muslim country has to fear 
Israel.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 4:15:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 It seems  obvious to me that the reason Iran feels
 the need for insurance is to  deter Israel and the
 U.S. from attacking *them*.  Or, absolute worst  case,
 to do a preemptive strike.  That's what all  the
 annihilation talk is about, to discourage us from
 messing with  Iran.
 
 Nobody ever talked about messing with Iran until they became  hell 
 bent on building nuclear bombs.

Does the phrase axis of evil ring a bell?





 Their insurance has become their  provocation towards 
 Israel and the west. If all they ever really wanted was  cheap 
nuclear energy 
 for electricity everything could have been worked out. But  it is 
obvious that 
 is not all they wanted, they wanted the ability to enrich  uranium 
so they 
 could make weapons. And nobody in their right minds trusts the  
number 1 
 terrorist supporting country in the world with  nukes.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/16/06 9:52:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does the 
  phrase "axis of evil" ring a bell?

Was that a regime change 
policy?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 9:52:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Does the  phrase axis of evil ring a bell?

 Was that a regime change  policy?

Of course it was.

States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of 
evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.  By seeking weapons 
of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger.  
They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to 
match their hatred.  They could attack our allies or attempt to 
blackmail the United States.  In any of these cases, the price of 
indifference would be catastrophic. 

We will work closely with our coalition to deny terrorists and their 
state sponsors the materials, technology, and expertise to make and 
deliver weapons of mass destruction.  We will develop and deploy 
effective missile defenses to protect America and our allies from 
sudden attack.  (Applause.) And all nations should know:  America 
will do what is necessary to ensure our nation's security. 

We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side.  I will not wait 
on events, while dangers gather.  I will not stand by, as peril draws 
closer and closer.  The United States of America will not permit the 
world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most 
destructive weapons.

--George Bush, State of the Union address, 1/29/02

It's very definitely a clear statement of the president's attitude 
and it leans -- it seems to me -- toward a policy of telling these 
governments that if they do not get out of business of terror and 
developing weapons of mass destruction, they stand at risk of their 
regimes being deposed forcefully by the United States.

--James Woolsey, former CIA director, on PBS Newshour 1/30/02






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

2006-04-16 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/16/06 11:05:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 It is  just that those controlling 
 Bush want to try to further secure the oil  resources of the 
Middle 
 East by force, and so are deciding to take this  rhetoric from 
Iran 
 seriously, in order to provoke  war.
 
 
 
 Of course, it's all Bush's  fault.

Yes, it is definitely his fault for not finding a reasonable 
solution to this problem. Being in charge of the most powerful 
government in the world, able to act with virtually no political 
opposition, and all he can figure out is to play 'my bombs are 
bigger than your bombs' with any country that challenges him?

Bush has massive economic leverage and diplomatic resources at his 
disposal. He could be creative about this. Instead he persists in 
playing the role of a very dangerous fool, and a fool is all he is.

So, go ahead and support this guy like a TB, and forgive all of his 
mistakes (there are many). It will lead nowhere but misery. He is a 
dangerous fool.   





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




  1   2   >