this problem.
Regards,
Mike
On 1/15/2011 4:33 PM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
Am 15.01.2011 18:10, schrieb Michael B. Brutman:
On 1/15/2011 10:23 AM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
The new ftpsrv app from mTCP works, but at least on my system seems to
have problems with showing correct DOS paths. For instance it shows
Are there any FreeDOS users using a PCjr?
I suspect that except for the weird memory hole that the video hardware
creates and the use of NMI for keyboard handling, everything else should
work pretty well. But I'd like to hear from somebody who knows.
Regards,
Mike
I have posted the latest and greatest code (again) at
http://www.brutman.com/mTCP . This version has some minor bug fixes and
a new FTP server application.
Besides downloading it from the link above, for a limited time you can
get it using FTP directly from the PCjr that I do my testing on.
On 12/21/2010 8:54 AM, dos386 wrote:
AFAIK the inline ASM is more painful in WATCOM than in Boreland C or
CC386 compilers (I ever tested the latter one only). The are also
pre-brewn int86() int386() and maybe more functions to fire the INT
instruction but don't ask me how they exactly work.
A new version of mTCP is available in the usual place:
http://www.brutman.com/mTCP .
If you are on an older clone machine and you have not been able to make
the larger apps run correctly, then you want this version. The Watcom
compiler runtime that I am using now was incorrectly flagging some
Geraldo Netto wrote:
Hi Michael/All,
Would be possible to release it as gpl or any other oss license?
(i guess someone already asked for it, but anyway...)
Kind Regards and Best Wishes,
Geraldo
Geraldo,
It is in the works. My employer has to review the code and bless it
first to protect
I just posted the latest and greatest code at
http://www.brutman.com/mTCP . This version supports IP fragments, which
might help with some of the stranger network and gateway setups out there.
Another neat feature that I should have done a while ago is command line
editing for FTP, including
Mateusz Viste wrote:
I believe you wanted to say frame instead of packet and 64 instead of
60? As far as I know, an IP packet can transport no payload, which gives a
20-bytes packet in result. :-P
The limitation is about the minimum size of the frame, which (on ethernet) is
of 64 bytes, to
Hi,
Just a quick note - I've posted a new version of mTCP at
http://www.brutman.com/mTCP .
The biggest change is a bug fix. Some packet drivers refuse to send
packets less than 60 bytes in size while many older packet drivers don't
care. Technically speaking, a packet less than 60 bytes in
dos386 wrote:
to me it's still unclear what it is supposed to do and whether it
works in (Free-)DOS at all, considering the shots you posted ;-
It is a LAN status monitor. It monitors the status of your LAN. ;-0
--
the disk.
Sent from Johnson's iPhone
On 21 Jun 2010, at 12:54 PM, Michael C. Robinson plu...@robinson-west.com
wrote:
I have a zip 250 atapi drive where I am wondering why Battletech 2 the
Crescent Hawk's Revenge knows that this isn't a harddrive? Does
anyone
know a simple
I have a zip 250 atapi drive where I am wondering why Battletech 2 the
Crescent Hawk's Revenge knows that this isn't a harddrive? Does anyone
know a simple way around this issue?
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up
ReactOS is neither a stable nor potentially even a promising project
anymore depending on who you talk to. Sadly, I got kicked off of the
forum boards and the IRC channel. I haven't been back since.
I don't like when people say, ReactOS is cloning Windows under the
GPL and this work doesn't
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 11:53 +0100, Liam Proven wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Michael C. Robinson
plu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
ReactOS is neither a stable nor potentially even a promising project
anymore depending on who you talk to. Sadly, I got kicked off of the
forum boards
Well Karen,
I don't know much about screen readers and DOS let alone screen readers
and Linux or screen readers and Windows. I feel after reading your
response, especially the laugh out loud part, that you were rude and not
in line with the spirit of don't turn this mailing list into what is
I know how to boot freedos via etherboot.
How do I load freedos via pxelinux?
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune
I have been interested in ReactOS, but as of today I gt my forum posting
priviledges revoked for merely recommending that open source compilers
and build tools be used instead of MSVC and the Windows SDK. The
ReactOS community seems to be extremely abusive, so I no longer link
to the ReactOS home
I used to go by the name nute on the ReactOS forums.
My site concerning Reactos is:
http://web.robinson-west.com/reactos.php
or:
http://xerxes.robinson-west.com/reactos.php
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 20:33 -0800, dos386 wrote:
Who needs WIndaube?
I don't :-D
I have been interested in
What are the goals at this point for Freedos 1.1?
When might it actually be released?
Freedos 1.0 definitely has some bugs still that could be fixed.
Updating Freedos 1.0 is haphazard at best, especially with limited
networking support and movement towards a newer updating standard.
What are
I have a VIA Apollo Pro 133 chipset motherboard with a PIII 450 on
it.
There are some memory timing parameters in the bios as well as some
other parameters that include usb support, usb keyboard, usb mouse,
assign irq for usb, assign irq for vga. Should I be assigning
an IRQ for usb or vga?
My Intel D845PEBT2 P4 System networks no problem and ssh works on it.
On my Tyan S1854 Pentium III board, ssh doesn't work no matter how I
load freedos even when I load it without drivers. I suspected
that maybe the sbinit.com program was installing a TSR to emulate a
standard soundblaster that
Bear with me, I suppose in a dos environment that it is hard to support
hardware device XYZ because in dos most hardware is controlled by
application programs. Sound cards for example are activated often times
by games. I have the PCI version of the soundblaster 16 and it works
under freedos,
The newest kernel 2039 seems to fix a lot of problems. Is there ongoing
kernel development?
What has to be updated still before Freedos 1.1 comes out?
I occasionally see stuff get added to http://www.freedos.org, but the
1.1 release seems to be delayed.
I see no reason why there couldn't be a
I know about prodos.exe, it requires Windows to
extract the drivers from it and the drivers you
extract are probably Windows drivers.
An update on the reset problem, updating to kernel
2039 and dropping emm386 updating himem as well
seems to fix the problem. Another advantage of
kernel 2039 is
I've been net booting freedos to play battle tech I no problem.
Even with a ramdisk though, I can't get battle tech II to work.
I picked up a packet driver for the D845PEBT2 built in nic, but
whether it's wget or lynx, trying to execute the application simply
causes the computer to reset. Uge!
DOS predates more than 4 gigabytes of memory on a single computer, yet
there has been a LOT of discussion on having Freedos be able to handle
that much memory.
There has also been a lot of discussion on making sound cards which
lack dos drivers work in Freedos.
My concern is, these features
There was an effort to create a 32 bit version of freedos with memory
protection and possibly some other features. What is happening with
this project? I'm just curious is all.
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the
Anyone know where Freedos 1.1 stands at this point? I'd like to see
it get released. I would also like to see a focus on supporting
people who want to set up their own local update servers. Putting
dos on the Internet has some major downsides. The fdupdate program
seems to have an option to
in Windows, then SHARE the printer. Then in DOS, one
can do this:
b) NET USE lpt1: \\windowspc\printershare
What would be the equivalent of that in FreeDOS?
--
Michael Potter
--
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:07 -0400, Santiago Almenara wrote:
Hello!
I've been using FreeDOS for a couple of months and it's working great.
Right now, I am trying to install Windows for Workgroups 3.11. Is it
possible to use it with higher resolutions? For instance 1024x768 16
millions
It's starting to dawn on me that although Freedos is an
excellent choice for being able to run most old dos programs,
it's a nightmare from a network security point of view. I
suppose there's the option of running it on top of Linux
and using Linux to control where dos can go on your network,
I never intended to start a WAR over Arachne and coming
up with a Windows replacement.
I would like to see Arachne, because it's graphical
and there are no filter plugins for it, moved from the
Freedos ditribution to say an extras respository. I
can't install procon:latte to Arachne, which
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 10:29 +0200, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
Michael Robinson schreef:
I haven't gotten the positive response I had hoped for trying
to drum up some interest in a Windows 9x replacement. Some
have talked about possibly enhacing HX extender and cloning
Windows 3.x first
It isn't Firefox and so there isn't a filtering plugin for it that will
block certain web sites. It is very low resolution by today's standards
and php web pages aren't likely to work correctly with it. I've had
problems downloading from ftp sites with Arachne with the download
being corrupted.
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 05:21 -0800, dos386 wrote:
No it is not and it is rude
Try ReactOS forum. How long you will survive
there before getting banned, if you are not yet.
Have you been banned from the ReactOS forums?
Too many people treat it like it's a mere hobby
and tempers do flare on
I haven't gotten the positive response I had hoped for trying
to drum up some interest in a Windows 9x replacement. Some
have talked about possibly enhacing HX extender and cloning
Windows 3.x first, which makes a lot of sense.
Maybe it doesn't make sense to replace dos based Windows.
Maybe
being worked on, all it does is make people angry.
Because you are unable to describe your problem in a way
understandable to other people ;-)
It's not that simple. Asking questions about
when XYZ will work or what is being worked on
raises people's ire because they can't give
good
I got a SB PCI 16 bit sound card I picked up working
by installing first to windows 98. Unfortunately,
there is no way to install in a dos only environment
directly. Worse, I have to create a Windows
directory tree with mywindows98/system/nameofpcidriver.???
For dos initialization of the
It seems that the sound blaster ISA and sound blaster 16 PCI
cards are the only ones that will work with freedos. Well,
I have a soundmaker cadenza on my D845PEBT2 Intel mobo with
a P4. It would be nice if there was a dos driver for this
sound card, but as far as I know there is only a
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 22:29 +0200, Eric Auer wrote:
Hi!
It seems that the sound blaster ISA and sound blaster 16 PCI
cards are the only ones that will work with freedos. Well,
This is not freedos specific. It depends on your games or
other software that you use for sound output,
Has anyone else run chkdsk on their Freedos C drive and gotten this
error? I have a 500 meg partition which is probably FAT16. I have
used Windows 98 to defrag another partition that I allow freedos to
access. Is the implementation of FAT in 98 and Freedos compatible?
Using chkdsk, I tried a
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 16:35 +0200, Eric Auer wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486? I lost the link to
fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it in fdupdate
v0.54. If using a 486 is the problem because of a bug in the math
coprocessor or something
MS-DOS and Windows 3.x are clearly abandonware. If I want to
use this abandonware, am I suddenly breaking the law?
Not suddenly. It is and was breaking the law. Of course you can
hope that MS is too busy hunting people who steal Vista, but
you cannot just say that stealing MS DOS is
Speaking of abandonware, all the Nintendo games for the original
8 bit system fit that description now. Should anyone distribute
an emulator to run the old games on PC's? Should anyone distribute
instructions on how to get a rom image of an old game so a person
can play it on his/her PC?
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 22:59 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
Downloading commercial software that you own a copy of for personal
use is not illegal. Downloading old commercial software that isn't
sold anymore which the author doesn't care about is not illegal.
To be illegal, the owner of the
Use without author's permission is not legal, selling without author's
permission is not legal (unless your local law allows otherwise), and
making a profit of something gets you in court quite fast indeed.
Bernd
The GPL is an exception, it gives you permission to use the software it
There is a need to elect leaders who will change the law concerning
abandonware.
Abandonware is any software program that is proprietary where the owner
of the intellectual property decides either a not to license any more
copies of it or b not to support it anymore. Typically, abandonware
is
Has anyone gotten fdupdate to work with a 486? I lost the link to
fdupdate v0.55 and the instructions on how to use it in fdupdate
v0.54. If using a 486 is the problem because of a bug in the math
coprocessor or something similar, that would be nice to know.
I've noticed that I get a C prompt
I have never used Vista. I think the minimum hardware requirements are
too high for me. Worse than that, I don't even like XP because it's
a pain to deal with activation and an even greater pain to back it up.
I've never figured out how to back up Windows XP. That said, I don't
use XP very
But just to say the last word about this thread: please avoid warez,
sources and links to any other illegal activities.
Thanks.
Aitor
Downloading commercial software that you own a copy of for personal
use is not illegal. Downloading old commercial software that isn't
sold anymore which
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 09:38 +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote:
On Sunday 12 April 2009 07:54 (CEST), Michael Robinson wrote:
I'm not certain
that I really want to try WordPerfect Suite 8
for Windows 95 on 98se.
If you ask me, I am using WordPerfect 6.0 for DOS, which does the job just
fine
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 20:13 -0500, Jim Hall wrote:
If you own a computer that had MS-DOS 6.22 and Windows 3.1
on it at one point, but your install media are fried, try
this abandonware site.
http://vetusware.com
I worry about the legality of downloading from this site, but
That's why I haven't been testing it on my 486 to see if it crashes or
not.
Since it's meant for freedos 1.1, how do I test it again?
BTW: The archives for this list are really hard to search.
--
This SF.net email is
I notice that I can run Windows 98 SE on my old
486 DX2 66 with 32 megs of ram. Windows 98 SE
supports more recent programs than Windows 3.1
does. Gem is nice, but it can't support windows
apps and it isn't meant to. I'm not certain
that I really want to try WordPerfect Suite 8
for Windows
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 10:34 +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote:
On Friday 10 April 2009 10:24 (CEST), Michael Robinson wrote:
I'm still getting the 2 near fnodes error with fdupdate.
Do you tried the beta 0.55 version I sent you few days ago (the one using
HTGET as a downloader)? Still crashing
If you own a computer that had MS-DOS 6.22 and Windows 3.1
on it at one point, but your install media are fried, try
this abandonware site.
http://vetusware.com
I worry about the legality of downloading from this site, but
technically the software they are allowing people to download
is
Robert Riebisch wrote:
Michael Horvath wrote:
I know there used to be a DOS utility called DOUBLESPACE. Not sure if it
works for FreeDOS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DoubleSpace
Note also that I have FreeDOS installed on a SD card in my PDA. Not sure
these hard disk utilities
I think I'm using the stable kernel instead of the
unstable one.
I get an error that says essentially unload the
protected mode software and try again when windows
tries to start.
Are people taking out the smartdrive stuff or
simply adding a menu entry and if someone wants
windows loading
Not workgroup.
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an error that
there isn't enough extended memory.
Uge!
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 14:34 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
Load the microsoft version that comes with windows, himem too.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an error
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:35 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
Load the microsoft version that comes with windows, himem too.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an
Is there a way to compress folders so they take up less space? Ideally,
I would like to be able to compress into a zip file, and still have the
OS treat it as a regular folder. As long as other OSs can view/access
the folder and its files, then any type of compression is OK.
Thanks.
-Mike
Well, I also thought about that.
I am working on an DOS application I wanted to package into FreeDOS's
format by default.
My exe is using a file called cwsdpmi.exe but cwsdpmi.exe is actually a
renamed hdpmi32.exe. Normally I would assume to cd to the folder where
my app is inside and to start
It looks like you want it more reliable... Sounds very reasonable.
Actually more pros (more easy for you, faster) then cons (file size).
As you have the most work with it,
do it.
-mr
Mateusz Viste schrieb:
Hi people!
So far, we have always used packaging sources and binaries differently
I was wrong about wget not crashing, it just took it a long time to
crash running it on it's own. Is the kernel going to be reworked
anytime soon to remove this fnode concept?
--
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 17:12 +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote:
On Friday 03 April 2009 16:08, Michael Robinson wrote:
When I run fdupdate, it crashes with a 2 near fnodes error.
Hi,
Please define the crash. When exactly is it happening? When FDUPDATE is
starting itself, or when it run wget
I'm not certain about what is crashing. Changing to curl makes no
difference at all. This works on my Pentium 4, so I suspect there is
something specific to my 486 that is causing the problem. I wish the
crash message was more descriptive. A dump of the processor's registers
and more than
Christian Masloch schrieb:
It's a client and not a network drive.
So a network drive that shows you a directory of a network server would be
no network client?
You can perhaps always call it client.
But network drive is only the right word if it works in background and
you get an
There is
- SSHDOS v0.95 November 25, 2003 and
- SSH2DOS v0.2.1 from April 23, 2006
Why the more recent version has a lower version number?
What are the differences?
There is also patch ROM-DOS Sockets patch from August 25, 2008, what
does it do?
-mr
Alain M. schrieb:
Michael Reichenbach
Eric Auer schrieb:
Hi Michael,
indeed, MS LFN started with version 7 (Win9x)...
What about FreeDOS kernel and LFN? Wouldn't it make sense
also to add LFN to the FreeDOS kernel?
Yes but: The DOSLFN license does not allow it so you would
have to re-implement LFN from scratch
Ralf A. Quint schrieb:
From that view it's not possible for non-cooperates (individual hobbyist
projects) to develop and publish software. You would always need a legal
department which is telling it's ok to violate patents, if them are are
accusing us we will accuse them with out collection
Eric Auer schrieb:
Hi Michael,
indeed, MS LFN started with version 7 (Win9x)...
What about FreeDOS kernel and LFN? Wouldn't it make sense
also to add LFN to the FreeDOS kernel?
Yes but: The DOSLFN license does not allow it so you would
have to re-implement LFN from scratch
usul schrieb:
I would expect this type of thinking to defeat the patent.
So educate me why am I wrong. :)
Well, the final verdict gives always the court. Unfortunately not always
the logic wins.
(I haven't said anything about bribemoney!)
It also depends on the technical understanding of
Ralf A. Quint schrieb:
However, I just care about laws in my own country (and the national ones).
As I live in Germany I see no reason to ensure to follow all US laws (no
racism or whatever here, just the same way I do not ensure it for any
other country where I do not life).
It seams to me
Ralf A. Quint schrieb:
Not the programmer of DOSLFN would be sued, also probable not the
hypothetical programmer for LFN in DOS-C.
I think it's the distributor who would get sued and this is in this case
the responsible person for the website. (Fortunally also other people
are redistribution
usul schrieb:
By the way I must repeat the question who would be theoretically sued?.
I would think the end users.
For Example:
Companies that distribute new PCs with FreeDos installed.
someone that sold FreeDos on a bootable USB
Someone that sold and built CD for open source.
And why
Jim Hall schrieb:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Michael Reichenbach
michael_reichenb...@freenet.de wrote:
Eric Auer schrieb:
Hi Michael,
indeed, MS LFN started with version 7 (Win9x)...
What about FreeDOS kernel and LFN? Wouldn't it make sense
also to add LFN to the FreeDOS kernel
Well, it would be theoretically possible to implement something like
ext3 as most DOS applications use the filesystem API and not the disk
directly, them wouldn't recognize.
But this wouldn't be a good solution as there are still much more other
patents we might have not considered yet.
-mr
David C. Kerber schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hall [mailto:jh...@freedos.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:30 PM
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] patents - was: LFN in FreeDOS
kernel? - was: aimed compatibility?
...
If LFN
The new and up to date and linked on freedos.org wiki seams to be
http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/freedos/index.php?title=Main_Page.
While when I google for freedos wiki I still find
http://wiki.fdos.org/. Can the old wiki be linked on freedos.org? It
still contains some informations.
Blair Campbell schrieb:
Also according to
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.Compatibility
it also seams doslfn is not the answer and needs bugchecking by a third
developer.
Even kernel support would have some of those issues, it seems only
not very fast
FreeDOS -
http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/02/02/365232.aspx
ctmouse, shsucdx -
http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2004/10/21/246136.aspx
--
___
Christian Masloch schrieb:
LFN for FAT and for NTFS are working stable in Linux. Could a FreeDOS
developer grab this free knowledge from Linux and improve DOSLFN this
way?
FAT and FAT32 are already supported by DOSLFN, even some CD-ROM
filesystems are. NTFS is not supported by any free
cleanzero schrieb:
I was trying to using the flat assembler FASM on freedos, but it complains
about missing DPMI services ? Is it possible in some way to use it ?
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.DPMI
example: hdpmi32 -r
This is an interesting topic...
If you want you can setup a FTP server on DOS running as TSR in background.
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.Servers
msclient is nice to mount a remote server into a DOS device letter,
unfortunately it's indeed a memory hog and
usul schrieb:
Uli,
I bought ORiNOCO Classic Gold PC Card.
http://www.orinocowireless.com/products/wifi/client/goldpccard/index.html
I know wireless is a risk but I checked in the documentation it had
dos and linux drivers :)
and I downloaded the ISO with all of that on it.
Well, wlan is
usul schrieb:
But I can do that from another pc that i usually have next to me. but
it would be nice to have a complete evironment.
And I have forgotten to say...
You are most likely much faster with browsing the web and mailing if you
use a modern computer, modern multi tasking operating
usul schrieb:
But yeah I was thinking that I would cheat for some of the stuff
for developing on FreeDos at first but later I would try and do everything
I could inside.
Cheat? Which kind of?
Because you are not doing everything on pure DOS this makes your
development more worse? That's s
Christian Groessler schrieb:
Hi,
If you want you can setup a FTP server on DOS running as
TSR in background.
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.Servers
?? This is a completely different topic.
No, since you asked for connecting to file server share in
Ok, now I got your point and must agree. :)
-mr
usul schrieb:
mr,
Because you are not doing everything on pure DOS this makes your
development more worse? That's s strange mind.
:) I'm strange I admit that but thats not whyI think it would be
cheating, you are coming from the wrong
, Michael Reichenbach
michael_reichenb...@freenet.de wrote:
Christian Groessler schrieb:
Hi,
If you want you can setup a FTP server on DOS running as
TSR in background.
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.Servers
?? This is a completely different topic
Christian Groessler schrieb:
Hmm, talking to a SMB server probably is quite involved (I've tried
to debug some samba problems in the past and the probably in the
last sentence is wrong).
But how about a new, simple, protocol to transfer directory information
and files between hosts? Nothing
Which kind of compatibility does FreeDOS aim for? I mean compatible with
which MS-DOS version? 6.22, 7.10, 8.00?
-mr
--
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Christian Masloch schrieb:
Which kind of compatibility does FreeDOS aim for? I mean compatible with
which MS-DOS version? 6.22, 7.10, 8.00?
As far as I can tell, 8.00 is the same as 7.10 plus some restrictions (I
used to have a PC with Windows Me).
Yes, well 8.00 can load Win ME.
alfio castorina schrieb:
Hi, I want to install freedos on my Macbook Pro using VMWare Fusion. Problem
is that after booting from the cd image and creating the C: partition after
reboot I get the message invalid operating system. I suspect that is due
that Freedos has not been installed yet and
Eric Auer schrieb:
Hi Michael,
I have created a wikipage which describes how you can install FreeDOS on
NTFS with permanent and full read and write access. It's not directly
installed on NTFS, but inside an raw image. There is no need to change
the partition table or the bootsector.
http
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 11:04 +0100, Eric Auer wrote:
Hi Michael,
Something specific to my hardware on my 486 DX2 66 must be causing
fdupdate to crash, but there seem to be no diagnosis tools to find
...
First try to boot without loading (J)EMM386, a common cause of
problems is a bad
Eric Auer schrieb:
Hi!
Another thing will be a list of things to test...
Well, things like xmstest, memtest, idecheck
Those are not kernel related as far as I remember.
Not related to kernel, but to hardware and base software. You can see if
the change has broken something in a special
Christian Masloch schrieb:
Could you please test whether aborting some other
application (no COMMAND.COM type program) works in FreeDOS?
Yes, first he application will be terminated and then also the command
interpreter which results in the same bug.
Well this shouldn't happen (and won't be
Christian Masloch wrote:
Of course DPMI doesn't work on PocketDOS, because it (by default) emulates
a real mode 80286 processor only. (XMS and EMS services are provided by
PocketDOS-specific drivers.) I downloaded the demo version (for x86
Windows) and it's really nice. It integrates the
301 - 400 of 792 matches
Mail list logo
