There appears to be a bug in the FF3x cell line generating code. border-collapse
is a mess, it doubles up some cell lines and drops others when drawing and
redrawing tables.
I had to make a nice lines between cells by assigning tds with bottom and right
sides only.
Al...
Jessi Berkelham
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 13:05 -0700, Jessi Berkelhammer wrote:
> Hi,
> This post is another one that might be better asked on a CSS-list, but
> it is relevant to this thread.
>
> The calendar at http://php1.net/my-php-calendar/ seems to have a similar
> issue to a problem I am havingcell borde
Hi,
This post is another one that might be better asked on a CSS-list, but
it is relevant to this thread.
The calendar at http://php1.net/my-php-calendar/ seems to have a similar
issue to a problem I am havingcell borders (sometimes) disappear in
Firefox when you zoom out. In both this ca
At 1:56 PM +0100 5/19/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
I just wanted to run this past you guys for thoughts and opinions or
even just to get brains ticking, it's all web development related
and touched on throughout this thread.
-mondo snip-
lol - i needed to get that out my system
Nathan:
You mak
At 4:24 PM -0700 5/18/09, Michael A. Peters wrote:
tedd wrote:
In most technical things you are right, but here I have to agree
with Paul. The user is king -- you must to design for them
regardless of their browser of choice -- even if their choice is a
bad one.
No.
You must design for a sta
At 4:03 PM -0700 5/18/09, Michael A. Peters wrote:
tedd wrote:
However, I cite things like a calendar, and your MUD site, and
other such solutions that would be very difficult to accomplish
using pure css.
I don't know about the MUD site - but again, a calendar is tabular
data and therefo
At 4:56 PM -0400 5/18/09, Marc Christopher Hall wrote:
and so I don't feel like a complete ass
http://jeffhowden.com/code/css/forms/
Marc:
Well... don't feel like a complete ass with that post -- that's a
great looking and working form. Very nicely done.
I'm book-marking that for future t
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>>
>>> lol
>>>
>> Glad
>>
>
> as they say
>
> did you ever get any help explaining css?
>
> just in case here's the ultra basics
>
> you have selectors and declarations
>
> selectors can be:
> .classname (a class, to be applied to many obje
All in the head... 8000+ lines of code in the head of this page; mostly CSS
Academia.edu
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Java anyone?
eh? how do you get java from that?
.
user requests content
sub-client required and application location are sent to users client.
sub-client is launched within users client
sub-client loads required application
application connects
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Java anyone?
>>> eh? how do you get java from that?
>>
>> .
>>
>> user requests content
>> sub-client required and application location are sent to users client.
>> sub-client is launched within users client
>> sub-client loads required application
>> application
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
I just wanted to run this past you guys for thoughts and opinions or
even just to get brains ticking, it's all web development related and
touched on throughout this thread.
At the core of this we have a sin
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>> I just wanted to run this past you guys for thoughts and opinions or
>>> even just to get brains ticking, it's all web development related and
>>> touched on throughout this thread.
>>>
>>> At the core of this we have a single
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
I just wanted to run this past you guys for thoughts and opinions or
even just to get brains ticking, it's all web development related and
touched on throughout this thread.
At the core of this we have a single problem, we create websites and web
based
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> I just wanted to run this past you guys for thoughts and opinions or
> even just to get brains ticking, it's all web development related and
> touched on throughout this thread.
>
> At the core of this we have a single problem, we create websites and web
> based applications
PJ wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
lol
Glad
as they say
did you ever get any help explaining css?
just in case here's the ultra basics
you have selectors and declarations
selectors can be:
.classname (a class, to be applied to many objects)
#someid (a single object)
p (redefine an html el
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> I just wanted to run this past you guys for thoughts and opinions or
> even just to get brains ticking, it's all web development related and
> touched on throughout this thread.
>
> At the core of this we have a single problem, we create websites and
> web based applications,
Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:55:47PM -0400, PJ wrote:
>
>
>> Marc Christopher Hall wrote:
>>
>>> and so I don't feel like a complete ass
>>>
>>> http://jeffhowden.com/code/css/forms/
>>>
>>>
>>> __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signat
I just wanted to run this past you guys for thoughts and opinions or
even just to get brains ticking, it's all web development related and
touched on throughout this thread.
At the core of this we have a single problem, we create websites and web
based applications, which we want to be deliver
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 04:43:20PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
That's the same problem XML has. The original idea was that you could,
for example, have an invoice, and because it was marked up with the
appropriate tags, everyone would be able to u
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 04:43:20PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Paul M Foster wrote:
>
>>
>> That's the same problem XML has. The original idea was that you could,
>> for example, have an invoice, and because it was marked up with the
>> appropriate tags, everyone would be able to understand
On 18/5/09 21:35, PJ wrote:
I anyone knows where there is a real source of information about CSS,
how to use it with logical explanations of what is used how, I sure
would like to hear aboutit.
Did you try the sources I already linked you to?
Surely I must be wrong but there must be a logical
Paul M Foster wrote:
That's the same problem XML has. The original idea was that you could,
for example, have an invoice, and because it was marked up with the
appropriate tags, everyone would be able to understand what it meant.
xml provides a standard way of pointing the reader to a referen
tedd wrote:
It seems to me that things like header, navigation, content, and footer
would be pretty standardized. However, in some sites the header called
the banner, footer is called copyright, navigation is called side-bar,
and content is called wrapper or something even less semantic.
W
tedd wrote:
At 4:05 AM +0100 5/18/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
And by the way, this attitude of "My code is fine; your browser sucks;
upgrade" can be the worst kind of arrogance, and people react to it
exactly as though it were arrogance. There used to be the same kind of
attit
Nathan Rixham wrote:
When I go and buy a film I don't buy a vhs or a betamax.. because I
can't - that industry simply stopped making them and if I want to own a
new film I buy the dvd - I don't write to paramount and complain because
I only have a betamax.
Funny - I'm about to finally buy
tedd wrote:
However, I cite things like a calendar, and your MUD site, and other
such solutions that would be very difficult to accomplish using pure css.
I don't know about the MUD site - but again, a calendar is tabular data
and therefore belongs in a table.
The design sin is using tabl
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:55:47PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> Marc Christopher Hall wrote:
> > and so I don't feel like a complete ass
> >
> > http://jeffhowden.com/code/css/forms/
> >
> >
> > __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
> > database 4084 (20090518) _
Marc Christopher Hall wrote:
> and so I don't feel like a complete ass
>
> http://jeffhowden.com/code/css/forms/
>
>
> __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
> database 4084 (20090518) __
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 04:13:47PM -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 8:15 PM +0100 5/18/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 14:48 -0400, tedd wrote:
>>
>> > I think the next big thing will be an argument over meaning. :-)
>>>
>> I don't mean using id attributes that appear to have meaning,
and so I don't feel like a complete ass
http://jeffhowden.com/code/css/forms/
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4084 (20090518) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (
I would like to add that last time I checked, this is the PHP Mailing List
and not CSS or anything else. Can we please get back to regular PHP banter?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
__ Information from ESET
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 16:35 -0400, PJ wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 14:48 -0400, tedd wrote:
> >
> >> At 10:48 AM +0100 5/16/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Trust me, semantics are gonna be the next big thing,
> >>>
> >> Semantics?
> >>
> >> What do
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 14:48 -0400, tedd wrote:
>
>> At 10:48 AM +0100 5/16/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
>>> Trust me, semantics are gonna be the next big thing,
>>>
>> Semantics?
>>
>> What do you mean by that?
>>
>> And therein lies the problem -- what mean
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 16:13 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 8:15 PM +0100 5/18/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 14:48 -0400, tedd wrote:
> >
> > > I think the next big thing will be an argument over meaning. :-)
> >>
> >I don't mean using id attributes that appear to have meaning, but
At 8:15 PM +0100 5/18/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 14:48 -0400, tedd wrote:
> I think the next big thing will be an argument over meaning. :-)
I don't mean using id attributes that appear to have meaning, but using
the proper tags to mark up content. That's things like
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 14:48 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 10:48 AM +0100 5/16/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >Trust me, semantics are gonna be the next big thing,
>
> Semantics?
>
> What do you mean by that?
>
> And therein lies the problem -- what means something to me, may not to you.
>
> For example
tedd wrote:
At 5:14 PM +0100 5/18/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
-- computing ... .. .
hows the childhood memories?
I had a childhood?
Cheers,
tedd
not sure? check the photo album - that's what I do - then look on like a
3rd person
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
At 5:14 PM +0100 5/18/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
-- computing ... .. .
hows the childhood memories?
I had a childhood?
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
tedd wrote:
At 8:52 PM +0100 5/17/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
semantics already are the next big thing and have been for a year or
three. google aquired the leading semantic analysis software many
years ago and have been using it ever since, likewise with yahoo and
all the majors. further we've a
At 8:52 PM +0100 5/17/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
semantics already are the next big thing and have been for a year or
three. google aquired the leading semantic analysis software many
years ago and have been using it ever since, likewise with yahoo and
all the majors. further we've all had open a
tedd wrote:
At 4:05 AM +0100 5/18/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
And by the way, this attitude of "My code is fine; your browser sucks;
upgrade" can be the worst kind of arrogance, and people react to it
exactly as though it were arrogance. There used to be the same kind of
attit
At 4:05 AM +0100 5/18/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
And by the way, this attitude of "My code is fine; your browser sucks;
upgrade" can be the worst kind of arrogance, and people react to it
exactly as though it were arrogance. There used to be the same kind of
attitude with rega
Well.
If you really really want to go Table less css.
You have to you one of those CSS frameworks.
I suggest YAML
And even with YAML.
You have to fix your design to IE6.
My point of view positioning with DIV was time consuming process and very
frustrating experience (especially with IE6).
On 18/5/09 08:03, Jim Lucas wrote:
all major browser vendors don't even support CSS1 or CSS2 completely/correctly
yet.
I don't think any browser vendor intends to implement the original CSS2
Recommendation; instead they are aiming for compliance with the CSS 2.1
revision.
We do have /very/
Robert Cummings wrote:
CSS3 will make our lives easier once it's fully supported by all major
browser vendors...
Rob, sorry to have to point this out to you, but all major browser vendors don't even support CSS1 or CSS2
completely/correctly yet. Plus, parts of what they do have implemented o
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:20:19PM +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:40:33PM +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 11:28 PM +0100 5/15/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
tedd wrote:
However, there are occasions such as in a calenda
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:20:19PM +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Paul M Foster wrote:
>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:40:33PM +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>
>>> tedd wrote:
At 11:28 PM +0100 5/15/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> tedd wrote:
>> However, there are occasions such as in a calenda
-Original Message-
From: Paul M Foster [mailto:pa...@quillandmouse.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 5:44 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] CSS & tables
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:40:33PM +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> tedd wrote:
>> At 11:28 PM +0100 5/
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:40:33PM +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 11:28 PM +0100 5/15/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
tedd wrote:
However, there are occasions such as in a calendar where not using a
table would be more than difficult. I haven't received a decree yet
On 17/5/09 22:43, Paul M Foster wrote:
*Except* in IE6, which is what probably most of the world is using.
Probably "a lot" rather than "most".
http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat.htm
---
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:40:33PM +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> tedd wrote:
>> At 11:28 PM +0100 5/15/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>> tedd wrote:
However, there are occasions such as in a calendar where not using a
table would be more than difficult. I haven't received a decree yet
as
Nathan Rixham wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 7:48 PM -0400 5/16/09, Stephen wrote:
PJ wrote:
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP
issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with
CSS
and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am
On 15/5/09 18:25, PJ wrote:
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
as positioning with CSS seems an impossibly t
tedd wrote:
At 7:48 PM -0400 5/16/09, Stephen wrote:
PJ wrote:
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
as posit
tedd wrote:
At 10:48 AM +0100 5/16/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Trust me, semantics are gonna be the next big thing,
Semantics?
What do you mean by that?
And therein lies the problem -- what means something to me, may not to you.
For example, if I make my header (or whatever) what
makes it
tedd wrote:
At 11:28 PM +0100 5/15/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
tedd wrote:
However, there are occasions such as in a calendar where not using a
table would be more than difficult. I haven't received a decree yet
as to IF that would be considered column data or not.
I'm gonna differ on this one,
At 8:38 PM -0400 5/16/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 19:48 -0400, Stephen wrote:
PJ wrote:
> I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
> but...
> I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
> and trying to avoid tab
At 7:48 PM -0400 5/16/09, Stephen wrote:
PJ wrote:
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
as positioning with C
At 9:15 AM -0400 5/16/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
FWIW, everything I've read indicates that tables don't affect SEO.
Cheers,
Rob.
Same here -- content is different than html.
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing
At 10:48 AM +0100 5/16/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Trust me, semantics are gonna be the next big thing,
Semantics?
What do you mean by that?
And therein lies the problem -- what means something to me, may not to you.
For example, if I make my header (or whatever) what
makes it the same as y
On 5/16/09 2:25 AM, "Paul M Foster" wrote:
> I liken this sort of discussion to the dichotomy between movie critics
> and people who actually go and see movies. The critics inevitably have
> all sorts of snobby things to say about the movies which are best
> attended. I'm not sure why anyone list
At 11:28 PM +0100 5/15/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
tedd wrote:
However, there are occasions such as in a calendar where not using
a table would be more than difficult. I haven't received a decree
yet as to IF that would be considered column data or not.
I'm gonna differ on this one, when you sim
On 5/15/09 6:28 PM, "Nathan Rixham" wrote:
> so ultimately i guess it's a case of 3 cheers and a round of applause
> for anybody who's thus far managed to create a website that works and
> that the client likes!
agreed. but lets hope some of the users like it too.
i think of all the web sites t
At 2:34 PM -0400 5/15/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
It is my opinion that browsers do not yet provided the necessary
functionality across a large enough user spectrum to facilitate the
versatility of layouts used by many sites today. That said, I place most
of the blame squarely on Microsoft.
Chee
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 09:15 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 10:48 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 02:25 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:25:42PM -0400, PJ wrote:
I know of no better place to ask. This may no
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 08:12:29PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Stephen wrote:
My sites are still viewable, and can be navigated. They just look strange.
Government workers are used to strange :)
Stephen
My experience is that government web sites are often the wors
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 08:12:29PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>
>>>
>> My sites are still viewable, and can be navigated. They just look strange.
>>
>> Government workers are used to strange :)
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>
> My experience is that government web sites are often the wors
Stephen wrote:
My sites are still viewable, and can be navigated. They just look strange.
Government workers are used to strange :)
Stephen
My experience is that government web sites are often the worst,
frequently designed in MS word using brutally illegal html that only
works in IE.
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 19:48 -0400, Stephen wrote:
PJ wrote:
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 01:52 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 09:15 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 10:48 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 02:25 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:25:42PM -0400, PJ wrot
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 09:15 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 10:48 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 02:25 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:25:42PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know of no better place to ask. This may not b
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 19:48 -0400, Stephen wrote:
> PJ wrote:
> > I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
> > but...
> > I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
> > and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my ti
PJ wrote:
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
as positioning with CSS seems an impossibly tortuous exercise.
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 10:48 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 02:25 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:25:42PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> >
> > > I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
> > > but...
> > > I am busting my hump tryi
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:25:42PM -0400, PJ wrote
I've been using div's with in css float and only setting width of
elements, that way your div grow dynamically pending on data size. it
takes some time figuring it out but you should be able to find examples
on the net.
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 02:25 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:25:42PM -0400, PJ wrote:
>
> > I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
> > but...
> > I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
> > and trying to avoid
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:25:42PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
> but...
> I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
> and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
> as positioni
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 03:12:06PM -0400, HallMarc Websites wrote:
> Um... sorry to jump in as a late arrival yet there you go
>
> What limitations? You could provide a layered layout using CSS and png
> graphic format. As for setting up columns check out float and clear and
> you're all set.
Nathan Rixham wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 2:06 PM -0400 5/15/09, Tom Worster wrote:
for one thing, a table is a great way of representing relations
(http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Relation.html). data tables are the
canonical
example but very often a form's structure is a relation, e.g. between
label
tedd wrote:
At 2:06 PM -0400 5/15/09, Tom Worster wrote:
for one thing, a table is a great way of representing relations
(http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Relation.html). data tables are the
canonical
example but very often a form's structure is a relation, e.g. between
labels
and input fields, o
PJ wrote:
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
as positioning with CSS seems an impossibly tortuous exercise.
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> tedd wrote:
>> At 2:06 PM -0400 5/15/09, Tom Worster wrote:
>>> for one thing, a table is a great way of representing relations
>>> (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Relation.html). data tables are the
>>> canonical
>>> example but very often a form's structure is a relation, e.g
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 15:12 -0400, HallMarc Websites wrote:
>
>> Um... sorry to jump in as a late arrival yet there you go
>>
>> What limitations? You could provide a layered layout using CSS and png
>> graphic format. As for setting up columns check out float and cl
tedd wrote:
At 2:06 PM -0400 5/15/09, Tom Worster wrote:
for one thing, a table is a great way of representing relations
(http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Relation.html). data tables are the
canonical
example but very often a form's structure is a relation, e.g. between
labels
and input fields, o
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 14:59 -0400, PJ wrote:
>
>> tedd wrote:
>>
>>> At 1:25 PM -0400 5/15/09, PJ wrote:
>>>
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 15:12 -0400, HallMarc Websites wrote:
> Um... sorry to jump in as a late arrival yet there you go
>
> What limitations? You could provide a layered layout using CSS and png
> graphic format. As for setting up columns check out float and clear and
> you're all set. TABLE,
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 15:12 -0400, HallMarc Websites wrote:
> Um... sorry to jump in as a late arrival yet there you go
>
> What limitations? You could provide a layered layout using CSS and png
> graphic format. As for setting up columns check out float and clear and
> you're all set. TABLE,
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 14:59 -0400, PJ wrote:
> tedd wrote:
> > At 1:25 PM -0400 5/15/09, PJ wrote:
> >> I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
> >> but...
> >> I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
> >> and trying to avoid tables; b
Um... sorry to jump in as a late arrival yet there you go
What limitations? You could provide a layered layout using CSS and png
graphic format. As for setting up columns check out float and clear and
you're all set. TABLE, TR, TD, TBODY, etc were never intended to be used in
the manner we see
tedd wrote:
> At 1:25 PM -0400 5/15/09, PJ wrote:
>> I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
>> but...
>> I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
>> and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
>> as positio
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 14:11 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 1:25 PM -0400 5/15/09, PJ wrote:
> >I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
> >but...
> >I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
> >and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like
At 2:06 PM -0400 5/15/09, Tom Worster wrote:
for one thing, a table is a great way of representing relations
(http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Relation.html). data tables are the canonical
example but very often a form's structure is a relation, e.g. between labels
and input fields, or between multip
At 1:25 PM -0400 5/15/09, PJ wrote:
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
as positioning with CSS seems an impo
On 5/15/09 1:25 PM, "PJ" wrote:
> I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
> but...
> I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
> and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
> as positioning with CSS seems a
PJ wrote:
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
as positioning with CSS seems an impossibly tortuous exercise.
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 13:25 -0400, PJ wrote:
> I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
> but...
> I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
> and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
> as positioning with
I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
but...
I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
as positioning with CSS seems an impossibly tortuous exercise. I've
managed
98 matches
Mail list logo
