b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180=eGdMZGu2wXhUupGwgGTrqF3b54OP5%2BAZvlHhABSexWY%3D=0
> >
> >
> > From: Sprinklerforum
> On Behalf Of Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design INC via Sprinklerforum
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 2:05 P
OP5%2BAZvlHhABSexWY%3D=0>
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design INC via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 2:05 PM
To:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design INC
Subject: RE: COMBUSTIBLE CONCEALED SPACE
My question is: Are QR u
Alright. Thank you. You confirmed my interpretation as well.On Jan. 11, 2022 15:56, Tom Wellen via Sprinklerforum wrote:Troy,
No. NFPA 13, 2019 edition in 9.3.2 is specific that sprinklers are listed
for horizontal combustible concealed spaces. Specifically listed to provide
prinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 2:05 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design INC
Subject: RE: COMBUSTIBLE CONCEALED SPACE
My question is: Are QR uprights listed to be used in those areas or does it
have to be a CCS sprinkler?
Troy
---
; Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design INC
Subject: Re: COMBUSTIBLE CONCEALED SPACE
Troy,
No. NFPA 13, 2019 edition in 9.3.2 is specific that sprinklers are listed for
horizontal combustible concealed spaces. Specifically listed to provide
protection.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:40 PM Trillium
Subject: RE: COMBUSTIBLE CONCEALED SPACE
My question is: Are QR uprights listed to be used in those areas or does it
have to be a CCS sprinkler?
Troy
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Tom Wellen via Sprinklerforum
Sent: January 11, 2022 3:56 PM
To: sprinklerforum
; Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design INC
Subject: Re: COMBUSTIBLE CONCEALED SPACE
Troy,
No. NFPA 13, 2019 edition in 9.3.2 is specific that sprinklers are listed
for horizontal combustible concealed spaces. Specifically listed to provide
protection.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:40 PM Trillium Fire
Troy,
No. NFPA 13, 2019 edition in 9.3.2 is specific that sprinklers are listed
for horizontal combustible concealed spaces. Specifically listed to provide
protection.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:40 PM Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design INC via
Sprinklerforum wrote:
> Can someone confirm that
Section 9..3.2 (19) says less than 36" must be listed..
Not sure the question fully..?
R/
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design INC via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 1:40 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
This issue was suppose to have been submitted for clarification but it didn’t
happen (so will have to wait until next cycle - WHICH HAS ALREADY STARTED with
PI’s being accepted). Nonetheless, the issue is does a single layer of batt
insulation modify the status of EXPOSED construction?
tston...@comcast.net <mailto:tston...@comcast.net>
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Kyle.Montgomery
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 11:55 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Combustible Concealed Space
I still need to verify, but it look
To: Sprinklerforum
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Combustible Concealed Space
How do they intend to secure the insulation?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
On Oct 23, 2018 at 10:48 AM, mailto:kmontgom...@aerofire.com
How do they intend to secure the insulation?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Oct 23, 2018 at 10:48 AM,
Since there isn't a clear exception I think you have to protect the space.
Otherwise, you are making an engineering judgement.
Nick Maneen, SET
c 704.791.7789
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of Kyle.Montgomery
Sent: Tuesday,
We have ALWAYS sprinklered these spaces.
Steve L.
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Kyle.Montgomery
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 7:49 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Combustible Concealed Space
I'm looking at a
rtinez <dmarti...@total-mechanical.com>
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Date: 02/08/2017 03:04 PM
Subject: RE: Combustible concealed space under stair
Sent by:"Sprinklerforum"
<sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org>
It’s just a dead
:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Subject: RE: Combustible concealed space under stair
Is this an enclosure.
Access door like a closet.?
Electrical equipment?
Art Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection/Tiroly
24400 Highland Rd CLE 44143
216-621-8899
216-570-7030 cell
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:s
:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:
sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] *On Behalf Of *Art Tiroly
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 08, 2017 12:49 PM
*To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
*Subject:* RE: Combustible concealed space under stair
Is this an enclosure.
Access door like a closet
Is this an enclosure.
Access door like a closet.?
Electrical equipment?
Art Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection/Tiroly
24400 Highland Rd CLE 44143
216-621-8899
216-570-7030 cell
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Dewayne Martinez
Dewayne,
Try 8.15.6, if it is Platform.
Regards,
G. Tim Stone
G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
NICET Level III Engineering Technician
Fire Protection Sprinkler Design
and Consulting Services
117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452
CELL: (802) 373-0638 TEL:
I have seen it go both ways. It depends on the AHJ. I have had the “sprinkler
scientist” type tell me that it isn’t above a small room so no.
Ron F
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Dewayne Martinez
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 10:09 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
o:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org
> <mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org>] On Behalf Of Roland
> Huggins
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:15 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> <mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
&g
um-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org
> <mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org>] On Behalf Of John
> Corcoran
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:56 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> <mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
> S
14, 2016 8:56 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction
Some input from our tech team:
While NFPA 13 "requires" that specially tested and listed sprinklers be used in
combustible concealed spaces 36" and less, the
liable KFR CCS is listed to be used in
areas that are 36 inches in height or less.
John Corcoran
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Cliff Whitfield
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:12 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: R
Behalf Of *Travis Mack, SET
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2016 5:51 PM
> *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> *Subject:* Re: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction
>
>
>
> I think he is saying that his concealed space is >36" in depth. If so,
>
o 60" deep with 16 x 16 spacing on the market
now.
Cliff Whitfield
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of Travis Mack, SET
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 5:51 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible Conce
I think he is saying that his concealed space is >36" in depth. If so,
then specially listed are not mandated.
If so, I have always used the QR reduction for 10' ceiling height in
those spaces provided it is a wet system. I have had some AHJs require
I go to the floor to get my deck height.
Taylor,
I believe you will need to use Concealed Space Sprinklers for that area and
will need to calc based on the manf data sheet.
Cliff Whitfield, SET
President
Fire Design, Inc.
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of Taylor
If you’re in West Des Moines, IA……. You will protect it, no matter what.
David Autry
Meininger Fire Protection
2521 West L Street, Suite 5
Lincoln, NE 68522
402.466.2616
402.466.2617 fax
da...@mfp-inc.com
*From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:
sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
ler.org> on
> behalf of Morey, Mike <mo...@bmwc.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 10:35 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: Re: Combustible Concealed Space
>
> This is the part where I ask "Can you please help me understand what code
>
I did, waiting on his reply
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> on behalf
of Morey, Mike <mo...@bmwc.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 10:35 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible Con
Trying a picture a sprinkler surrounded by insulation - quite absurd.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Travis Mack, SET
wrote:
> You have an AHJ that is missing a line of NFPA 13.
>
> 2013 edition: 8.15.1.2.7 Concealed spaces filled with noncombustible
> insulation shall not
uesday, August 9, 2016 10:34:07 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible Concealed Space
That was my point to him exactly.
Mike
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> on behalf
of Travis Mack, SET <tm...@m
Subject: Re: Combustible Concealed Space
You have an AHJ that is missing a line of NFPA 13.
2013 edition: 8.15.1.2.7 Concealed spaces filled with noncombustible insulation
shall not require sprinkler
protection
Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
2508 E Lodgepole Drive
Gilbert, AZ 85298
480-505-9271
You have an AHJ that is missing a line of NFPA 13.
2013 edition: 8.15.1.2.7 Concealed spaces filled with noncombustible
insulation shall not require sprinkler
protection
Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
2508 E Lodgepole Drive
Gilbert, AZ 85298
480-505-9271
fax: 866-430-6107
-
From: Sprinklerforum
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Ed Kramer
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 8:22 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible concealed space sprinklers
I'll be contacting the manufacturer later today to verify,
but I
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of Tony Eggster
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 5:48 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space sprinklers
In my opinion you're going to have
In my opinion you're going to have to stick to manufacturer listing for
these. I don't know of any type of exception. Fortunately they're only 4.2K
factor so chances are, if this is a 13 system, your pendants will more than
likely still be the driving factor depending on spacing and layout - even
Ed,
I think the only thing special about a COIN-type sprinkler is that, if
spaced (and calc'd) correctly the patterns will overlap in a shallow depth.
So if I were King, or better yet an AHJ, I would accept room design.
Brad
On Mar 14, 2016 5:25 PM, "Ed Kramer" wrote:
>
Hi Mark at Aero,
I was going to reply, "No", about 30 seconds after Dewayne posted this
question... "you could fill the attic with noncombustible insulation".
Brad
On Feb 11, 2016 6:48 AM, wrote:
> Hi Dwayne,
> Do the concrete planks have a fire rating, one hour, two
Hi Dwayne,
Do the concrete planks have a fire rating, one hour, two hour? If so, I believe
you have a good argument for not installing sprinklers in the combustible
concealed space. If not, sprinklers!
Mark at Aero
602 820-7894
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 4:55 AM, "Dewayne
forum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
>
> Hi Mark at Aero,
>
> I was going to reply, "No", about 30 seconds after Dewayne posted this
> question... "you could fill the attic with noncombustible insulation".
>
> Brad
> On Feb 1
...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
> On Behalf Of Jim Davidson
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 5:11 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: Combustible concealed space
> Dewayne,
> If I remember correctly placing a wood frame roof structure on top of a
> pre
Dewayne,
If I remember correctly placing a wood frame roof structure on top of a precast
concrete structure changes the ISO building construction classification from
Class 5 (modified fire-resistive construction) or Class 6 (fire-resistive
construction) to Class 2 (joisted masonry) which can
to install
sprinklers in this space.
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of Jim Davidson
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 5:11 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible concealed space
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
Hi Mark at Aero,
I was going to reply, "No", about 30 seconds after Dewayne posted this
question... "you could fill the attic with noncombustible insulation".
Brad
On Feb 11, 2016 6:48 AM, <mphe...@aer
Of Todd Williams
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:32 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
What clause in 13 are you using to justify eliminating sprinklers?
Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc
ursday, February 11, 2016 2:20 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
Hi Mark at Aero,
I was going to reply, "No", about 30 seconds after Dewayne posted this
question... "you could fill the attic with noncombustible insulation".
Br
Sorry, the section is 8.15.1.2.16
Mike Hill
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of Mike Hill
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 2:58 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Combustible Concealed Space
I'd say no. There is only about 3 clear between the bottom and top of the
framing. See figure 8.6.4.1.5.1 ('13).
Ron F
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Gregory
Lindholm
Sent:
Perfect. That is what I was thinking, but must have skimmed right past that
part.
Thanks
From: rfletc...@aerofire.com
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:32:36 +
I'd say no. There is only about 3 clear
Tony,
I am just getting started on a similar project, but not in Canada. I'm assuming
the 2 side of the 2x4 is the vertical? My guess is that if you position the
sprinklers at the the 1-1/2 to 4 down and center them between the trusses,
that is going to be about the best you are going to get.
, 2012 1:51 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space
It's another case of Architects designing buildings that don't comply with NFPA
#13s' construction requirements. When will they learn that NFPA 13 is building
code as well as a sprinkler system installation
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:04 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space
There are no NFPA 13 construction requirements. Yes, there are certain
non-sprinkler pipe features that must get added when you choose a particular
sprinkler solution. It's
19, 2012 7:04 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space
There are no NFPA 13 construction requirements. Yes, there are certain
non-sprinkler pipe features that must get added when you choose a
particular sprinkler solution. It's up to us to design
...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Greg McGahan
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:55 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible Concealed Space
We have run unto the use of COIN sprinkler multiple times and every time it is
a problem. I completely disagree with a listing
-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Greg McGahan
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 8:55 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible Concealed Space
We have run unto the use of COIN sprinkler multiple
-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matt Grise
Sent: December 18, 2012 11:41 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space
Tyco's CC1 data sheet shows a C-UL listing (page 1)
http
Tyco's CC1 data sheet shows a C-UL listing (page 1)
http://www.tyco-fire.com/TD_TFP/TFP/TFP630_07_2004.pdf
Viking makes a concealed space head that is listed for use in Canada. (see pg 3)
http://www.vikinggroupinc.com/databook/sprinklers/special/110503.pdf
Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP, NICET II
It's another case of Architects designing buildings that don't comply with NFPA
#13s' construction requirements. When will they learn that NFPA 13 is building
code as well as a sprinkler system installation standard?
Ron Fletcher
Aero Phoenix
-Original Message-
From:
@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space
It's another case of Architects designing buildings that don't comply with
NFPA #13s' construction requirements. When will they learn that NFPA 13 is
building code as well as a sprinkler system installation standard?
Ron Fletcher
Aero Phoenix
i mean)
-Original Message-
From: rfletc...@aerofire.com [mailto:rfletc...@aerofire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:51 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space
It's another case of Architects designing buildings that don't comply
18, 2012 1:51 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space
It's another case of Architects designing buildings that don't comply with
NFPA #13s' construction requirements. When will they learn that NFPA 13 is
building code as well as a sprinkler system
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space
It's another case of Architects designing buildings that don't comply
with
NFPA #13s' construction requirements. When will they learn that NFPA 13
is
building code as well as a sprinkler system installation standard?
Ron Fletcher
Aero Phoenix
to have a
nice day :) (that still works, right? the insulation i mean)
-Original Message-
From: rfletc...@aerofire.com [mailto:rfletc...@aerofire.com**]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:51 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.**orgsprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible
In regard to (1): I think the testing/listing of these sprinklers
anticipate an obstructed environment. The Tyco's are limited to 10' and 12'
max spacing, less than the 15' we're allowed for light and ordinary hazard
SSU's and SSP's. I didn't take the time to look at Viking's, but I assume
they
the French invented the System Internationale, and decided MASS would
be their ONE. In English, FORCE is ONE. Since pressure is force/area,
and force is mass times acceleration, and 'most systems are installed
on the Earth', why should sprinks convert?
The beauty of multiples of ten is
-
From: rfletc...@aerofire.com [mailto:rfletc...@aerofire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:51 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.orgsprinklerforum@**
firesprinkler.org sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space
It's another case of Architects
...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
AKS-Gmail-IMAP
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 6:40 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
It is not tar. It is asphalt. As the saying goes, It's not my asphalt.
It's your asphalt. But seriously someone has messed up big time
Jay,
A few years ago we had a case where the installing sprinkler contractor was
brought into a lawsuit because of an old roof (wood on metal joist) was left in
place when a new roof (wood on wood joist) was installed and at a later date a
second story (wood frame) was added above the second
What is the old roof construction? What is in the space between the old roof
and the new floor which is combustible?
At 07:13 AM 12/3/2012, you wrote:
We have a nursing home with a setup that I have not seen before. It looks
like the building was 2 floors originally and they added a third
not even get in to see what's there.
Jay Stough, SET
From: Todd Williams t...@fpdc.com
To: Jay Stough jaycs7...@yahoo.com; sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
What
Williams t...@fpdc.com
To: Jay Stough jaycs7...@yahoo.com; sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
What is the old roof construction? What is in the space between the old roof
and the new floor which is combustible
I never saw anything in the coin's listing saying that the concealed space
sprinklers had to be separated from quick response sprinklers by a draft stop
so why not just extend a quick response 4.2K into the larger area?
--- On Fri, 6/22/12, rfletc...@aerofire.com rfletc...@aerofire.com wrote:
...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ralphy Henderson
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 2:47 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space 8.15.1.6 (2007)
I never saw anything in the coin's listing saying that the concealed space
sprinklers had to be separated from quick
What do you mean by un-faced combustible insulation? No paper backing?
I have come across a situation a few times where the combustible concealed
space was filled with foam insulation. I haven't checked, but woud think the
foam is combustible. Anyway, I compared it to solid wood joist with
I've run into this often. Two alternatives to the problem are to
either fill the space with non-combustible isolation of seal the
combustible material with a noncombustible surface. If done correctly
it's no worse (fire wise) than continuing sheetrock on woods studs and
encapsulating them where
Are the stairs combustible construction? If they are, sprinkler protection
is required regardless.
See NFPA 13, 2007 Edition, 8.15.3.1
Benjamin Young
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Ron Greenman rongreen...@gmail.comwrote:
I've run into this often. Two alternatives to the problem are to
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space under stairs
Are the stairs combustible construction? If they are, sprinkler
protection is required regardless.
See NFPA 13, 2007 Edition, 8.15.3.1
Benjamin Young
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Ron Greenman
rongreen...@gmail.comwrote:
I've run
I think this would be a great topic for a webinar.
TD
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
We keep running into buildings with dormers on top of roofs in which
there are not sprinklers. They are sometimes not visible from the inside
and you only know they are there from the outside.
There is no exception that I know to omit sprinklers in these areas, but
should there be?
Greg
On
Those spaces need to be sprinklered. Should they be is a matter of
conjecture. As the standard reads now, a 1 ft x 6 combustible
concealed space would need to be sprinkelred if none of the
exceptions are met. A maximum size exception, similar to what they
have for vertical shafts is worthy of
@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
Those spaces need to be sprinklered. Should they be is a matter of
conjecture. As the standard reads now, a 1 ft x 6 combustible concealed
space would need to be sprinkelred if none of the exceptions are met. A
maximum size exception, similar to what
: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: June 10, 2010 7:07 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
Those spaces need to be sprinklered. Should they be is a matter
] On Behalf Of Fletcher, Ron
Sent: March 16, 2010 1:20 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible concealed space
Logic? Try this.
Shell retail space with 4-12 pitch wood roof. Rough in core and shell system
for OH2 at 10 ft. x 12 ft. spacing. Tenant installs a suspended ceiling
...@ch2m.com
http://www.ch2m.com
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of A.P.Silva
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:31 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible concealed space
Of A.P.Silva
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:31 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible concealed space
Any other comments?
Is NFPA 13 2002, 8.6.4.1.4 applicable only if the space is concealed? If so,
will a mech. room built in an attic be considered concealed
Logic? Try this.
Shell retail space with 4-12 pitch wood roof. Rough in core and shell
system for OH2 at 10 ft. x 12 ft. spacing. Tenant installs a suspended
ceiling. The attic is now light hazard combustible concealed space that
must comply with 8.6.4.1.4. A lesser hazard yet the OH2 design is
Sent: March 16, 2010 1:20, PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Combustible concealed space
Logic? Try this.
Shell retail space with 4-12 pitch wood roof. Rough in core and shell system
for OH2 at 10 ft. x 12 ft. spacing. Tenant installs a suspended ceiling. The
attic is now light
In the 2010 edition the issue of an air gap was finally addressed.
Look at 8.15.1.2.17. Unfortunately, the TC narrowly focused on this
one proposal and did not expand it to the other allowances that it
reasonable applies to. As such, that conversation needs to be had
with the AHJ before
Thanks.
Tony
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Roland
Huggins
Sent: January 22, 2010 11:09 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
look at the new
It could be that this wood deck,depending on the thickness,could be considered
Heavy Timber which would render it equal to non-comb.Contact the architect
and ask this to get his ruling.I just finished a church that was changed from a
steel beam girder structure to heavy timber to achieve a better
Of
lamarvau...@charter.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:41 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Cc: Cliff Whitfield
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
It could be that this wood deck,depending on the thickness,could be
considered
Heavy Timber which would render it equal to non-comb.Contact
...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
lamarvau...@charter.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:41 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Cc: Cliff Whitfield
Subject: Re: Combustible concealed space
It could be that this wood deck,depending on the thickness,could be
considered
Heavy Timber which would
Is the insulation paper faced? Would that make a difference in terms
of combustibility? If the insulation makes it a n/c space, why the 3000?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 26, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Cliff Whitfield cl...@fire-
design.com wrote:
Forumites,
I have a project that has steel roof
We don't run into this very often so I read the section you refer to.
8.15.1.6 refers to wood truss or wood joist construction. You have TJI
which is composite wood joist construction. As supporting evidence A.3.7.1
clearly has separate definitions. Composite is not a subset of straight
wood
I recommend you call Tyco tech support. I had a
similar situation recently -- the construction details
did not exactly match the one choice on the tech data
sheet which pictures TJI's -- and I was told to use
the CC2 sprinkler. This was not a quick, off-the-cuff
answer. Time was taken and more
Yes! SSU's
Thom McMahon, SET
Firetech, Inc.
2560 Copper Ridge Dr
P.O. Box 882136
Steamboat Springs, CO 80488
Tel: 970-879-7952
Fax: 970-879-7926
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Knight
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:53 PM
To:
, 2008 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Combustible Concealed Space Sprinklers
I recommend you call Tyco tech support. I had a
similar situation recently -- the construction details
did not exactly match the one choice on the tech data
sheet which pictures TJI's -- and I was told to use
the CC2 sprinkler
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo