Hi Steve,
you wrote on Monday, January 10, 2000, 23:40:54:
How is it different? I can't see much of a difference between my TBUDL
folder and a news group (I'm using Forté Agent, BTW). Of course, various
commands like "Reply to all" would have a different meaning ("post to all
news groups"
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Saturday, January 08, 2000, John Sullivan wrote to TBUDL about
Quick Search question:
JS I'm wondering how the Quick Search functionality actually works.
JS Under Miscellaneous Commands in the help, is listed:
Search for a string Ctrl+Q F
Search and replace
Hi Mark,
you wrote on Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 00:30:32:
[snip]
LG - Will v2.0 support hooks for virus scanning attachments to messages?
Yes.
SL *VERY* Bad.
MA Gone:-(
Why the heck (sorry) is that "*VERY* bad"?? That's something very
useful, IMHO.
Ralf.
--
BackMagic: Disaster
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:02:37 AM, Ralf wrote:
More threaded? :-) Doesn't any reply to a news or mail message automatically
create a or add to a thread?
No. There are a lot of email applications which do not use References and
In-Reply-To. Most notably the web based email readers
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:10:21 AM, Ralf wrote:
Why the heck (sorry) is that "*VERY* bad"?? That's something very
useful, IMHO.
Because it will either be one of two varieties.
1: Click on it and scan.
This is bad because it is an added step that the user could screw up,
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, Allie Martin wrote to Steve Lamb about
suggestion- / wish-list:
I like vim.
Think about it for a minute.
Again, PMMail does it just fine on both Windows and OS/2.
Think another minute. :)
AM I was experimenting
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:37:59 AM, Thomas wrote:
And here is the stupid question: what is "scoring"?
Scoring is a filtering system (hush and listen, I know TB! has filtering)
whereby the filters assign a score to a newsgroup article based on the rules
provided in the score. You can
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:37:59 AM, you wrote:
And here is the stupid question: what is "scoring"?
Not a stupid question. I just discovered it when I downloaded Xnews
today. It is a way of ranking messages in a newsgroup based upon very
fancy filters. I don't claim to
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:44:38 AM, Oleg wrote:
There is editing and editing. When people will realize that editing message,
editing program, editing HTML, editing presentation, editing newspaper are
different tasks, they will not want one editor for everything.
I do realize they are
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:00:08 AM, Januk wrote:
Off Topic Question:
Does anyone using Xnews know if and how you can download messages to
read off-line?
No. See its manual.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 02:20:16 + GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 9:20:16 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Marck Hi Watcher,
Marck On 11 January 2000 at 20:16:54 GMT -0500 (which was 01:16 where I
Marck live) [EMAIL
Hi tracer,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:53:59 +0700GMT (11/01/2000, 16:53 +0800GMT),
tracer wrote:
t Why should that be a problem ? I mean if they are on the list they
t donot get rejected and if they arent they shouldnt be posting!
t As almost anyone gets to know about this mailing list via the
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 2:38:15 AM, you wrote:
snip
Marck D. Pearlstone Because the macro is referring to the name once it is
in the
Marck D. Pearlstone *destination*. In the destination - the address header - the
first
Marck D. Pearlstone name is the name
Hello Steve,
Steve, can you read? Which part of taking this off-line did you not
understand?
This thread is dead-horse. Anyone interested in following Steve and my
mud-wrestling grin can see and/or participate at:
http://www.takeitoffline.com/1/H/ToODb9tSlfLnelM6Lc6.html
Leif Gregory
--
Hello Steve,
Thank you for such a comprehensive explanation. I wonder why we did
not implement this thing before :-) This thing must be very useful
for mailing list as well...
Best regards,
Stefan
...Southern DOS: Y'all reckon? (yep/Nope)
--
Hi Szendr,
On 11 January 2000 at 11:14:17 GMT +0100 (which was 10:14 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
Marck D. Pearlstone Picture this: In a reply message, the address in
Marck D. Pearlstone the To field did *not* come from your address
Marck D. Pearlstone
hallo Steve!
on Monday, January 10, 2000, 10:23:17 PM, you wrote:
SL Monday, January 10, 2000, 1:09:39 PM, Wolfgang wrote:
I often have more than 20 windows active inside Opera, and
they are easy to work with. Try to do that using IE/NS and
the task bar. For me, it's annoying.
SL And
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:03:46 -0800GMT (11/01/2000, 17:03 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
And here is the stupid question: what is "scoring"?
SL Scoring is a filtering system (hush and listen, I know TB! has filtering)
[...]
SL get per day. That is why I said email and news are
Hello,
I want to export some of my emails to MS Outlook. How do I got about this
as the only 2 export file type available are Unix and RFC-822 message files.
Regards
Conrad EJ Gonsalves
Resistance is Futile
---o^o---( Conrad EJ Gonsalves aka
Hello,
SL Doesn't do multiple accounts nor does it have a decent overview of what is
SL in even a single account. Try again.
Outlook would do. Either way, TheBat! is not *just* for fetch/send/store/search mail.
--
With best regards,
Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL
Hello,
ST Thank you for such a comprehensive explanation. I wonder why we did
ST not implement this thing before :-) This thing must be very useful
ST for mailing list as well...
And I see our new feature rising at the horizon...
--
With best regards,
Claudius Regn
Hello Steve,
SL "optional" items to make it comparable to Bat v1.x? You are aware that by
SL virtualizing everything in the manner they have described they are adding in
SL several layers of complexity? Each layer has its own potential for bugs.
Then your conclusion will be: do not try to
On Tuesday 11 January 2000 Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
I like UltraEdit. It is multiwindow and is almost always resides in my
tray. If I will have to close external editor to let TB! know that I
have finished message editing -- I don't like the idea of using my
favorite editor within TB!
Yes,
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, Steve Lamb wrote to Oleg Zalyalov about
suggestion- / wish-list:
SL Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:44:38 AM, Oleg wrote:
There is editing and editing. When people will realize that editing message,
editing program, editing HTML,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:53:51 PM, Claudius Regn wrote:
SL not directly related to the main task at hand, *reading email*.
SL They are doing this without that core application's full
SL potential even being completely realized.
If you just want to *read mail* you can use
Hello Leif,
On Monday, January 10, 2000 you wrote:
We are finally done. I hope you all find it as informative as I did!
Thanks Leif!
I have just reminded myself a question: what about unicode (utf-8)
support?
Best regards,
--
Christopher J. Trybowski
Hello George,
GMM It doesn't go this way my friend.
GMM A mail reader is made for one job. To read mail. As much as your
GMM coffee machine is made to make coffee.
GMM All i want is to read mail.
First: in *your opinion* "it doesn't go this way", my friend.
Obviously you consider a
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 13:48:18 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AM I don't think we can be clearer than that. I have only one
AM addition. If I could use virtual folders, I'd use them in my main account
AM *only*.
That's your choice.
Well, of course. I only brought up my personal
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 22:26:18 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
My reasons for liking MDI interfaces has absolutely nothing to do with
memory consumption. Even if Opera required more memory using MDI, I
would still prefer it. I hated having to randomly choose between the
multiple IE buttons on the
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:39:26 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
I never use cascades because, as you might have noticed with Opera, some
applications don't play nice in a cascade. Opera, for example, doesn't
recognize clicks for focus on certain areas of the window and in a large
Hallo Allie and Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:49:07 -0500 GMT (11.01.2000, 22:49 +0800 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
I never use cascades because, as you might have noticed with Opera, some
applications don't play nice in a cascade. Opera, for example, doesn't
AM Steve, Leif has
Monday, January 10, 2000, 12:09:35 PM, Christopher wrote:
I agree -- I love the way it is now in Opera -- one button for my WWW
browser on the taskbar, instead of plenty. How would it look, if we
had separate window and taskbar button for every account in TB? That's
more or less the
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 2:21:32 AM, Leif wrote:
Steve, can you read? Which part of taking this off-line did you not
understand?
The part where you didn't declare it a dead horse until now. *YOU* took
it offline and ended your remarks. I countered with a final rebuttal.
--
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 2:34:17 AM, Stefan wrote:
Thank you for such a comprehensive explanation. I wonder why we did
not implement this thing before :-) This thing must be very useful
for mailing list as well...
One would think until you try to wrestle with the idea of how to
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 3:53:51 AM, Claudius wrote:
Then your conclusion will be: do not try to make complex software.
Doesn't work for me.
No. My conclusion is given the bugs and inconsistencies that still
persist in the 1.x series I don't have much faith that RITLABS can move to a
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 3:58:38 AM, Claudius wrote:
Outlook would do. Either way, TheBat! is not *just* for
fetch/send/store/search mail.
No, and that is the problem. An email client should be just for that.
Outlook would not do because it is not an email client by any stretch of the
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 5:14:26 AM, John wrote:
Or auto-completion of header lines, integration of the Address Book
into header lines.
Incorrect, these are still a part of TB! and are editable there. See
PMMail.
Another point: sending a freshly composed email now becomes a two-stage
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 5:43:55 AM, Oleg wrote:
Why do carpenters need other tools than bench axe? Underlying concept
to most of those is the same: wood.
A bench axe cannot change configuration to suit the task at hand. A
program can be configured for the task at hand. Apples and
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:13:12 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Or auto-completion of header lines, integration of the Address Book
into header lines.
Incorrect, these are still a part of TB! and are editable there.
See PMMail.
Agreed. PMMail still takes responsibility for the headers
Hello Leif,
I have to respond to this one. What you've said here epitomizes the
way a support board should really be. I'm not new to computers or
software, my first experience with them was a big hot room with racks
of vacuum tubes glowing and tons of little flashing lights.
Anyway, if some
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 9:33:52 AM, Allie wrote:
Agreed. PMMail still takes responsibility for the headers etc. The
editor only does the message body itself. What about templates though
Steve? How will that be dealt with?
Separate out TB! from its editor. Which is generating
Hallo Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:19:50 -0800 GMT (12.01.2000, 01:19 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
And you didn't answer the main my question: how will TB! know that I'm
done with editing new message with my favorite editor if I have three
more files open with it and don't want to close
Hallo Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:42:52 -0800 GMT (12.01.2000, 01:42 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
Agreed. PMMail still takes responsibility for the headers etc. The
editor only does the message body itself. What about templates though
Steve? How will that be dealt with?
SL
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 9:57:26 AM, Thomas wrote:
That's exactly what I meant, not only macro results, butwhole
tempaltes including quotes.
Exactly. All of that text is generated by the core program before it is
passed into the internal editor's buffer. Replace "buffer" with temp file
Hi Ralf,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 8:10:21 AM, you wrote:
RB Hi Mark,
RB you wrote on Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 00:30:32:
RB [snip]
LG - Will v2.0 support hooks for virus scanning attachments to messages?
Yes.
SL *VERY* Bad.
MA Gone:-(
RB Why the heck (sorry) is that "*VERY*
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 4:44:16 PM, Claudius Regn wrote:
First: in *your opinion* "it doesn't go this way", my friend.
Obviously you consider a lot of features belonging to '*reading mail*'
- and not just reading mail, that's why you use TheBat! You think this
or that is essential 'mail
In Reference to "Editor (was: Re: suggestion- / wish-list)" From Steve Lamb:
SL Of all people I'd think another unix user would get it right
SL off the bat.
Right off "the bat". Ha-ha, I get it. He should get the info off the
bat because you're sending it from the bat! ha-ha, he-he, .
Hallo Mark,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 18:19:20 + GMT (12.01.2000, 02:19 +0800 GMT),
Mark Aston wrote:
LG - Will v2.0 support hooks for virus scanning attachments to messages?
SL *VERY* Bad.
RB Why the heck (sorry) is that "*VERY* bad"?? That's something very
RB useful, IMHO.
MA Because
Hallo Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 10:17:53 -0800 GMT (12.01.2000, 02:17 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
I haven't followed the thread closely...so pardon me for asking this,
but can someone please tell me *why* again?
SL Because a dedicated editor will always be better than an editor thrown
Hallo George,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:55:44 +0200 GMT (12.01.2000, 02:55 +0800 GMT),
George M. Menegakis wrote:
GMM So mail reading means at least you should have a way to
GMM fetch/read/write/send/organize/search mail.
You *are* describing Outlook here.
GMM All the other things are optional.
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 10:57:24 AM, Thomas wrote:
I agree with this. It will only your system down. Supposing you have
an active virus-scanner running anyway, which you should. :-)
s/only your/only slow your/gi;# :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 10:55:44 AM, George wrote:
Fetching and sending mail could be done using external dedicated program.
For the convinience of users it could be great to implement a way to
communicate with the mail server.
Actually, it is done by external dedicated programs.
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 11:03:57 AM, Thomas wrote:
GMM So mail reading means at least you should have a way to
GMM fetch/read/write/send/organize/search mail.
You *are* describing Outlook here.
No. Outlook also has newsreading, a contact list, a to do list, a day
planner, a kitchen
Hallo Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:09:55 -0800 GMT (12.01.2000, 03:09 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
I agree with this. It will only your system down. Supposing you have
an active virus-scanner running anyway, which you should. :-)
SL s/only your/only slow your/gi;# :)
LOL! But I'm
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 9:51:07 AM, Thomas wrote:
Suppose I reply to a message (like just now), I will still need the send/put
in outbox/etc buttons. I will also still want the header information being
transferred and editable.
I'm not sure about the headers. The upside is that it
Hallo Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:16:16 -0800 GMT (12.01.2000, 03:16 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
You *are* describing Outlook here.
SL No. Outlook also has newsreading, a contact list, a to do list, a day
SL planner, a kitchen sink
I litterally Laughed Out Loud when I read this.
Hi all,
IMHO, this is mainly loads of discussion about a piece of software
that's supposedly arriving somewhere in the near future. What I
noticed about the interview was mainly that there is no single hard
fact about that piece of software available. There's some "of course
this
Hello George,
GMM Let's draw a line.
GMM In order to read mail you should
I did not mean hairsplitting. You do.
GMM So mail reading means at least you should have a way to
GMM fetch/read/write/send/organize/search mail.
GMM All the other things are optional.
So by that rationality 95% of
Hello Steve,
SL clients have a rotten core. Sure, they look pretty, but bite into it, really
SL sink your teeth into it and you find it is sour inside with no substance.
I don't think so. Almost all mail clients do perfectly offer all the
options you described -- and George described to be
Hello Steve,
Either way, TheBat! is not *just* for
fetch/send/store/search mail.
SL No, and that is the problem. An email client should be just for that.
SL Outlook would not do because it is not an email client by any stretch of the
SL imagination.
Hahaha, Steve -- thank you for your
Hi there!
On 11 Jan 00, at 9:19, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: suggestion- / wish-list":
When I write a book I will need heavy word processing including
cross-references and so on.
Which is possible. I've seen books written in just VI. OTOH, you'll note
I didn't put word
Hi there!
On 11 Jan 00, at 22:08, Oliver Sturm wrote
about "Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Fina":
b) To move old messages to ...
For the b) option a browse button with the ability to select a destination
folder, even across accounts would be nice. This makes for an archiving
Hi there!
On 11 Jan 00, at 22:15, Claudius Regn wrote
about "Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Fina":
SL TB! is good in some areas (database management) than other clients and
SL worse in other areas (IMAP).
I'd rather have spell checking than IMAP. I'd rather have html-viewing
than
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:05:47 PM, Owen wrote:
Why not complain
Because a computer professional is paid to work with computers.
Personally any such person who complains about an editor like TB!'s while
working on vi I'd really suspect their talents and experience.
If their editors
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:35:12 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
b) To move old messages to ...
For the b) option a browse button with the ability to select a destination
folder, even across accounts would be nice. This makes for an archiving
capability of sorts.
Seems like a
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:10:22 PM, Claudius wrote:
So by that rationality 95% of TheBat! functions are by now optional.
Yup. And the remaining 5% which is core needs improvement.
It does not, neither does TheBat!
Sure it does. Let's take, for example, non-conformity to the CUA
Hello The Bat! ML,
Suddenly the bat gave me an error, that there would be a problem
with my inbox and there is one file left there called bad4141.TMP
... how can I repeair it ... please it's my inbox!!! help me!!
Best regards, Clemens
written with TheBat! 1.38e
on Windows 98, 4 10
Build
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:43:31 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[..snip..]
Advanced functionality *should* be supported, as much as possible! This
is the major point for me, personally. Of course, provided that it
doesn't bloat the code heavily and doesn't contradict with how the
program
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:15:51 PM, Claudius wrote:
I don't think so. Almost all mail clients do perfectly offer all the
options you described -- and George described to be besic features.
No, they do not. Do you really want me to get into my rant about how
email clients are a shadow
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:18:39 PM, Claudius wrote:
Hahaha, Steve -- thank you for your serious argumentation...
I am serious. As others have noted Lookout! is a personal information
manager which happens to have email functionality. It would be like calling
Netscape an email client
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:22:40 PM, Alexander wrote:
Which is possible. I've seen books written in just VI. OTOH, you'll note
I didn't put word processing into my list because I do know that is a
different task than just editing ASCII text.
Unless you use TeX;-) In this latter case,
On Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:58:46 PM, Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote:
Hello The Bat! ML,
Suddenly the bat gave me an error, that there would be a problem
with my inbox and there is one file left there called bad4141.TMP
... how can I repeair it ... please it's my inbox!!!
Hi Clemens -
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 3:58:46 PM, you wrote:
CGS Hello The Bat! ML,
CGS Suddenly the bat gave me an error, that there would be a problem
CGS with my inbox and there is one file left there called bad4141.TMP
CGS ... how can I repeair it ... please it's my inbox!!! help
On Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 2:30:11 PM, Mark Worsham wrote:
It's the high priority flag.
Oh, I see... thanks Mark. I like that concept better than a separate
column for marking high priority messages that some Mailers use, and the
colour certainly does stand out, doesn't it. :o)
Nick
---
Hello Nick,
I can't remember where I saw it but I think there is a mailbox rebuild
program someplace. I had an error too, said something about the index. I can't
find it again. Sorry, not more help..
---
Thanks,
John
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 2:23:32 PM, you wrote:
NA On
Hello Mark,
Your info brings up a question of mine. Does the program compress the
messages files at anytime? When messages are deleted, those holes in
the database could very well lead to trouble. Is there a compress,
re index, backup routine anyplace and if not would it be a feature for
1.4,
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:37:20 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 4:37:20 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas Hi tracer,
Thomas The answer to your question was in your mail:
I was very busy and it looks like I marked
Hello all fellow TBUDL members,
Message base garbage detected. Broken data is saved to
(location)\bad92f3.tmp.
Please contact your tech support about repairing the message base.
That's what's happening. I also can't save messages or download mail.
I closed all my other programs, then
Hello Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 at 01:03:46 [GMT -0800], you wrote:
SL Scoring is a filtering system (hush and listen, I know TB! has
SL filtering) whereby the filters assign a score to a newsgroup
SL article based on the rules provided in the score.
Good explanation Steve. You've convinced
Hello users,
Steve and I are discussing OT posts (off-list). I've noticed lately
that there has been a huge jump in list traffic that is OT.
So please see the below.
putting on the moderator hat now I've said it before many times,
and I'll say it again. If a discussion has strayed into the OT
Hi John,
On 11 January 2000 at 15:10:21 GMT -0800 (which was 23:10 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
JR Is there a compress, re index, backup routine anyplace
Yes - see 'Folder / Purge' and 'Folder / Compress' and 'Folder / Purge
Compress' and Folder options
Hello Douglas,
Go to the TBUDL FAQ at:
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/howdoi.shtml and see the "Messages"
section.
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 at 19:30:08 [GMT -0600], you wrote:
DMHMessage base garbage detected. Broken data is saved to
DMH(location)\bad92f3.tmp.
DMHPlease contact your tech
On Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 5:02:19 PM, Leif Gregory wrote:
SL Scoring is a filtering system (hush and listen, I know TB! has
SL filtering) whereby the filters assign a score to a newsgroup
SL article based on the rules provided in the score.
Good explanation Steve. You've convinced me that
Hello all fellow TBUDL members,
Problem Solved by Douglas himself, who has been careless it turns out.
It seems that you can't pour water into a glass that's already full.
Netscape is in the same partition and is now downloading the 250th of
359 messages on the TUBDL and Opera list account and
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 05:56:15PM -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
Steve also described what Agent had (which I mistakenly thought was
scoring), and although I find that meets my needs at present, true
"Scoring" sure does sound interesting. I might try X-News just to see for
myself, and compare
On Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 6:30:56 PM, Steve Lamb wrote:
1: Gravity also has scoring. Of the two, XNews and Gravity, I think Gravity
it is easier to configure scoring for the neophytes out there. XNews takes a
more traditional approach to the score file.
You know, I tried Gravity for a
On Tuesday 11 January 2000 Steve Lamb wrote:
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 5:14:26 AM, John wrote:
Or auto-completion of header lines, integration of the Address Book
into header lines.
Incorrect, these are still a part of TB! and are editable there. See
PMMail.
I often alter these
Hi Leif,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 10:43:36 +0900GMT (12/01/2000, 09:43 +0800GMT),
Leif Gregory wrote:
LG putting on the moderator hat now I've said it before many times,
LG and I'll say it again. If a discussion has strayed into the OT realm,
LG please move it off-list. www.takeitofflist is a very,
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:35:12 +0300GMT (12/01/2000, 05:35 +0800GMT),
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
b) To move old messages to ...
For the b) option a browse button with the ability to select a destination
folder, even across accounts would be nice. This makes for an
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:22:40 +0300GMT (12/01/2000, 05:22 +0800GMT),
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
When I write a book I will need heavy word processing including
cross-references and so on.
Which is possible. I've seen books written in just VI. OTOH, you'll note
I
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:27:39 -0800GMT (12/01/2000, 03:27 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
Suppose I reply to a message (like just now), I will still need the send/put
in outbox/etc buttons. I will also still want the header information being
transferred and editable.
SL I'm not
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:53:20 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 3:53:20 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Alexander Care to write a formal bug report now?;-)
Alex, maybe they fix it if there are more paying
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:57:24 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 1:57:24 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
LG - Will v2.0 support hooks for virus scanning attachments to messages?
SL *VERY* Bad.
RB Why the heck
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:43:31 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 4:43:31 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Alexander Therefore I wish to solidarize with those who are *against* adding HTML
Alexander editing,
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 13:51:27 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 4:51:27 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:05:47 PM, Owen wrote:
Why not complain
(snipped)
Steve Yeah. I've been working on a
Hello Oliver Sturm,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:59:38 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 1:59:38 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Oliver Sturm wrote:
Oliver Hi all,
Oliver IMHO, this is mainly loads of discussion about a piece of software
Oliver that's supposedly
Hello Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 22:58:46 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 4:58:46 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote:
Clemens Hello The Bat! ML,
Clemens Suddenly the bat gave me an error, that there
Hello Claudius Regn,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 22:15:51 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 4:15:51 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Claudius Regn wrote:
Claudius Hello Steve,
SL clients have a rotten core. Sure, they look pretty, but bite into it, really
SL sink your teeth
Hello Nick Andriash,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:23:32 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 5:23:32 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Nick Andriash wrote:
Nick On Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:58:46 PM, Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote:
Hello The Bat! ML,
Suddenly
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 10:42:35 + GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 5:42:35 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Marck Look: If you are using TB internationally, don't use local naming
Marck conventions in the address
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
