From: "Blaine Borrowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You see everything through dark glasses, Perry, sorry I can't help you
Blaine
Is it possible that the reason that it appears that I see everything
(everything LDS) through dark glasses is I am looking at dark things?
Is it possible that since I have
In a message dated 4/2/2004 10:56:21 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The way I understand it John "love from a pure heart is the goal of the instruction" and the reality is that we are inadequate and unable to love the way God does without a lot of help. We don't love Him the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]judyt
-- did you answer this? John
jt: I thought so but maybe it went
astray..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: If something is not in line with what is written in
the law and prophets we can know it is darkness and error which is why we need
to understand God's
From: "Wm. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>jt: You may sin but you should not possess sin, nor should
sin possess you. We must learn to hate evil and to separate
ourselves. So whenever we do slip we go to our advocate and repent; this
is how we overcome. Put on righteousness and sin not
B
See you on North temple tommorow Blaine? Blaine Borrowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You see everything through dark glasses, Perry, sorry I can't help you.Blaine- Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:25 P
In a message dated 4/2/2004 5:09:55 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Her revelatory experience powerfully parallels JSs--they share a non-biblical semi-sinister authoritarian mystique projected from an unknown mind--about like DavidM/Plato, Bill/Lance/Polanyi do it--very nicely.
BT: I'll let you have the last word, Judy. I'm
sure you say it better than anything I could say against it.
JT: We don't need to be honest about our shortcomings,
they see them.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02,
judyt -- did you answer this?
John
In a message dated 4/2/2004 2:57:58 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 4/2/2004 2:27:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If something is not in line with what is written in the law and prophets
From: "Wm. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>Judy
says > I used to believe that anyone who claimed to be Christian
should be perfect.
Judy, I think there are unbelievers who still believe this. Do you believe
that maybe the language Christians use -- for instance, "Christian perfection"
-- m
In a message dated 4/2/2004 8:38:14 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whatever they were I believe God's Truth survives in spite of all that
I agree, of course. The point is this: if good (the translation of the KJV) came from this sorry situation, certainly God's grace wil
In a message dated 4/2/2004 8:32:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know whether or not I agree because I don't know what your definition of grace is John. If when you say grace you mean "unmerited favor to cover sin"
Is your definition of the greek translated "grace
In a message dated 4/2/2004 8:37:24 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RECENTLY HEARD ON THE MORNING LIGHT SHOW:
Why "The Passion of Christ" is Rated R
Izzy -- you scooped these folks. Good show.
John
JT > You may sin but you should not possess sin, nor
should
sin possess you. We must learn to hate evil and
to separate ourselves.
So whenever we do slip we go to our advocate and
repent; this is how
we overcome. Put on righteousness and sin
not
BT: I'm not sure exactly what you
From: "Wm. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Judy says > I used to believe that anyone who
claimed to be Christian should be perfect.
Judy, I think there are unbelievers who still
believe this. Do you believe that maybe the language Christians use -- for
instance, "Christian per
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No thanks Billt - I don't want to look like Polanyi, Torrance, Mounce,
Robertson et al. and anyway under the New Covenant
john: Some of these people, or folks just like them, gave you your
Bible. It came from their effort. The KJ wasn't
RECENTLY HEARD ON THE MORNING LIGHT SHOW:
Why "The Passion of Christ" is Rated R
The "R" of course is because of the violence, the gore.
In movie terms "R" stands for RESTRICTED,
but in this movie "R" stands for RELEVANT,
for REALISTIC,
for it REALLY happened
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My
goal is spiritual maturity so that I am able to walk consistently in God's
blessings and I do believe this is attainable on this side of death. jt
john: Absolutely but God's grace covers less than that until it
happens. I am guessing
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
No that's not exactly what I'm saying - do you have a big problem with the
KJV? It's been at the top of the pile for more than 400yrs and I don't
know of a new one that can hold a candle to it for the beauty of it's prose and
its understan
- Forwarded Message -From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Salvation is present progressive
john: boy, I"M confused. Salvation by faith apart from works
people believe this. So I as a Christ can and do possess sin and that
is the way it should be (or is) as long as I
From: "Wm. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Judy says
> I used to believe that anyone who claimed to be Christian should be
perfect. I think there are unbelievers who still believe this. Do you
believe that maybe the language Christians use -- for instance, "Christian
perfection" -- may be fuel
You see everything through dark glasses, Perry, sorry I can't help you.
Blaine
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Blaines Lost sheep of america
> >From: "Blaine Borr
Great poem, John. Very poignant. (However,
I thought God was a St. Louis Cardinal!!!)
Can we see a photo of you with shaved legs, please? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 7:11
PM
To: [
Only those who can lose their salvation. GO
CUBS!!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 6:58
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Admixture of
Love 4 God/God/s Word and...
In a
message dated 4/2/2004 5
In a message dated 4/2/2004 5:32:19 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GOD IS A CUBS FAN
Wow -- if this gets out, I fear many will become atheist.
John
Thank you, thank you, my brother. You have helped
me see the error of my ways. Why couldn't I see this sooner? You are
right!!!
GOD IS A CUBS FAN!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 6:36
PM
Subject:
In a message dated 4/2/2004 5:32:19 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
EVERY CHRISTIAN KNOWS HE'S A CARDINALS FAN!
Now I know why you believe in salvation by grace.
J
Now I KNOW you ain't no Christian -- talkin that
way about God.
EVERY CHRISTIAN KNOWS HE'S A CARDINALS
FAN!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 6:10
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Adm
A poem - I am working on this "I am a nice guy" image. I tainted that image somewhat so I have shaved my legs (in pentence) and wrote this poem:
Dodger Blue
I was walking with the Lord
And He was talking to me
Walking and talking, hoping I'd see
A Cloud by day, a pillar by night,
But I j
Your's is an argument from emotion,
DaveH; a subtle justification for liars lying based on the notion that you
have an affintity/preference/nature akin to theirs--you are in them, they are in
you, and none of you can afford to prove your
philosophers wrong.
'Theirs' includes, e.g.,
Izzy.
In a message dated 4/2/2004 3:17:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No thanks Billt - I don't want to look like Polanyi, Torrance, Mounce,
Robertson et al. and anyway under the New Covenant
Some of these people, or folks just like them, gave you your Bible. It came from th
In a message dated 4/2/2004 4:06:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My goal is spiritual maturity so that I am able to walk consistently
in God's blessings and I do believe this is attainable on this side of
death. jt
Absolutely but God's grace covers less than that until
In a message dated 4/2/2004 3:24:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No that's not exactly what I'm saying - do you have a big problem
with the KJV? It's been at the top of the pile for more than 400yrs and
I don't know of a new one that can hold a candle to it for the beauty
In a message dated 4/2/2004 3:43:38 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Salvation is present progressive
boy, I"M confused. Salvation by faith apart from works people believe this. So I as a Christ can and do possess sin and that is the way it should be (or is) as long as I am
Judy says > I used to believe that
anyone who claimed to be Christian should be
perfect
I think there are unbelievers who still believe
this. Do you believe that maybe the language Christians use -- for
instance, "Christian perfection" -- may be
fueling the misunderstanding? Do you beli
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 5:04
PM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Education - Is it
evil?
Billt: Judy, So when saying you agree with DavidM, you do not
really mean you agree with his use of the term
From: "Wm. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>PS, when I say
"deceptive" I am not meaning deceptive in an
evil sense but deceptive in that it is misleading to the one who
hears you say it but still sees you sinning.
jt: Only misleading if I claim to be where I'm not; I
don't think
it misleading to s
Billt: Judy, So when saying you agree with DavidM, you do not
really mean you agree with his use of the term Christian perfection.
Is that what I should understand you to be saying?
jt: I don't really understand the outworking of what
DavidM
believes, I thought he was talking about
sancti
PS, when I say "deceptive" I am not meaning
deceptive in an evil sense but deceptive in that it is misleading to the one who
hears you say it but still sees you sinning.
- Original Message -
From:
Wm. Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 4:50
Judy,
So when saying you agree with DavidM, you do not
really mean you agree with his use of the term Christian perfection. Is that
what I should understand you to be saying? Because I don't think we have to
wallow in the mud either. I do think there is less deceptive ways of saying that
t
Billt:
Judy, Allow me to expand a little bit. Maybe this will help me to
understand the term. Judy says All truth is not positive and
all error
is not negative - and noone has arrived that I know of so far. Judy,
how does this statement jive with your Christian perfectionism?
Doesn't t
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Many errors and ommissions and the reason they were
stored away
was probably because they weren't the best manuscripts
and so didn't
get worn out.
john: Are you saying that the mss discovered after the KJV translation
was completed aren't reliable! So we ha
Judy,
Allow me to
expand a little bit. Maybe this will help me to understand the
term.
Judy says >> All truth is not positive and all error is not negative - and noone has arrived
that I know of so far.
Judy, how does this statement jive with your
Christian perfectionism? Doesn't t
Judy says All truth is
not positive and all error is not negative -
and noone has arrived that I know of so
far.
Billt:
Judy, how does this statement jive with your Christian
perfectionism?
jt: I'm not sure what you perceive to be my "Christian
pefectionism" Bill.
I don't think it
Judy says >
Why is it that you, and Billt like to counsel and
evaluate so much David?
Why not deal with the issues rather than the person?
Are big words and
semantic arguments always helpful? Why did Jesus
Creater of the Universe
speak in Aramaic the common language of the people?
In a message dated 4/2/2004 11:47:11 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 4/2/2004 8:35:18 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Explain last sentence: "God Himself" "Theological statements operate with what we may call open concepts-concepts whi
Judy says >> All truth is not positive and all error is not negative - and noone has arrived
that I know of so far.
Judy, how does this statement jive with your
Christian perfectionism?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Frid
Judy says > Why is it that you, and Billt like to counsel and evaluate so much
David? Why not deal with the issues rather than
the person? Are big words
and semantic arguments always helpful? Why did Jesus Creater of the Universe speak in Aramaic the common language of
the people? . . .
By the way, I'm enjoying the heavy theological discussions, even though they
are over my head. I'm only a cat, after all. Izzy
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Rated "R"
Amen sister!!! Good pre
In a message dated 4/2/2004 2:27:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If something is not in line with what is written in the law and prophets we can know it is darkness and error which is why we need to understand God's Word and learn to know His Ways.
If I can't be wrong a
In a message dated
4/2/2004 8:58:07 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Correct but the plumbline by which we evaluate
is not semantics Greek Words
etc. It is Isaiah 8:20. jt
john: How does this solve the problem if we undersand the problem to be
a sense of assurance abou
Judy wrote:... when I hear someone speak on that level with
understanding that can only come from God - I listen. But when
someone tries to impress with big words and complicated
semantics. Oh well! To each his own.
jt: Let me say right up front that I have never said
that education
Thanks, but it was sent to me by a friend. I don't know who wrote it, as it
wasn't attached. But it IS good preach'in! Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
I kinda' like the non-cut-n' paste emails. Someone
reading this wouldn't see the highly values CONTEXT, John. I agree though re:'
boxes and walking and talking" Flawed don't cut it we're downright dastardly
(Saints though we might call ourselves) Blessings Saints,
Lance .
- Original M
In a message dated 4/2/2004 12:55:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John sins-daily, hourly, moment(ly). Please correct me if this is not true concerning either of you.
Lance knows entirely too much about me, that is clear.
All ow me to add a comment to David Miller. Wh
As an interloper I'm with John. This is a syntax vs
semantics discussion. PS to other readers-Please look these words & use them
properly. Whatever you choose to call it, name it, theologize concerning it-I
sin, David sins, John sins-daily, hourly, moment(ly). Please correct me if this
is no
In a message dated 4/2/2004 8:13:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
those are not my words you're responding to John. Lance
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 02, 2004 10:43
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Admixture of Love
In a message dated 4/2/2004 8:12:56 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I apologize in advance for what might be perceived as an intrusion but: J & John-same guy? Knpraise seems to manifest two personalities if the same person (MPD) Help me straighten this out at least for my rea
In a message dated 4/2/2004 9:46:18 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear John,
I did not mean to upset you. Let me restate what I think is important
for us to communicate here. I will consolidate it down into two
questions.
Ditto
1. I desire from you an acknowledgment th
In a message dated 4/2/2004 8:58:07 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Correct but the plumbline by which we evaluate is not semantics
Greek Words etc. It is Isaiah 8:20. jt
How does this solve the problem if we undersand the problem to be a sense of assurance about our knowi
In a message dated 4/2/2004 8:44:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You guys are "tensin' me up. Please restate your position on holiness/perfection/ and let an amateur jump in a little. Lance-
Can this actually be done, David/ I am game.
By the way, brother Miller, I
In a message dated 4/2/2004 8:35:18 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Explain last sentence: "God Himself" "Theological statements operate with what we may call open concepts-concepts which, to be sure, must be closed on our side, for we have to formulate them as carefully and e
Dear John,
I did not mean to upset you. Let me restate what I think is important
for us to communicate here. I will consolidate it down into two
questions.
1. I desire from you an acknowledgment that there is no Greek scholar,
not Mounce or anyone else, who has translated 1 John 1:8 and Romans
Are you the moderator? If not you should be. You mediate well. Lance
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 02, 2004 12:14
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Education - Is it evil?
> Judy wrote:
> > Why is it that you, and Bill like to co
"Peace" is apparently the operative word with you Mr. Miller. Thanks once
again. Humbled a second time. You teach as you write, David. Peace be to
you. Lance
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 02, 2004 12:14
Subject: RE: [Truth
Judy wrote:
> Why is it that you, and Bill like to counsel
> and evaluate so much David? Why not deal
> with the issues rather than the person?
The problem is that communication is a two way street. If we don't deal
with problems in how we communicate with one another, then the
alternative is
You guys are "tensin' me up. Please restate your
position on holiness/perfection/ and let an amateur jump in a little.
Lance- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 02, 2004 11:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Grace and
Holiness
Explain last sentence: "God Himself" "Theological
statements operate with what we may call open concepts-concepts which, to be
sure, must be closed on our side, for we have to formulate them as carefully and
exactly as we can, but which on God's side are open to the infinite objectivity
and
The movie - the PASSION OF CHRIST is rated "R":
The "R" of course is because of the violence, the gore..
In movie terms "R" stands for RESTRICTED , but in this movie
"R" stands for RELEVANT , for REALISTIC , for it
REALLY happened for a REASON because we were
REBELIOUS we needed a REDEEM
In a message dated 4/2/2004 6:37:33 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe all the other Greek scholars have it right and we
have it wrong.
Speaking of broad brushes -- there it is.
Weslian theology is most certainly a minority opinion. Does that make a difference. Of
In a message dated 4/2/2004 7:45:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Miller: Bless you for handling this in a non-contentious fashion. I'm
humbled by your demeanour. Lance
Dito
John
In a
message dated 4/2/2004 5:57:06 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
God does not demand a high education. This is why he sent the Holy
Spirit
But because you have an idea or
interpretation for a given passage does not mean youwere visited by the Holy
Spirit, correct.
Amen sister!!! Good preachin' Lance
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 02, 2004 11:40
Subject: [TruthTalk] Rated "R"
>
> The movie - the PASSION OF CHRIST is rated "R":
>
> The "R" of course is because of the violence, the g
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Judy
wrote:... when I hear someone speak on that level with
understanding that can only come from God - I listen. But when
someone tries to impress with big words and complicated
semantics. Oh well! To each his own.
David: I think what you sai
I apologize in advance for what might be perceived
as an intrusion but: J & John-same guy? Knpraise seems to manifest two
personalities if the same person (MPD) Help me straighten this out at
least for my reading of the M posts. Lance
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTEC
those are not my words you're responding to John.
Lance
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 02, 2004 10:43
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Admixture of
Love 4 God/God/s Word and...
In a
message dated 4/2/2004 5:57:06
In a message dated 4/2/2004 6:14:00 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: Our Heavenly Father (the father of our spirits) is our main guy, John. Jesus is his only begotten Son and is also our Elder Brother has made sacrifice in our behalf which makes our return to heaven to
In a message dated 4/2/2004 5:57:06 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
God does not demand a high education. This is why he sent the Holy Spirit
But because you have an idea or interpretation for a given passage does not mean youwere visited by the Holy Spirit, correct.
John
David Miller: Bless you for handling this in a non-contentious fashion. I'm
humbled by your demeanour. Lance
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 02, 2004 10:15
Subject: [TruthTalk] Education - Is it evil?
> Judy wrote:
> > ...
Judy wrote:
> ... when I hear someone speak on that level with
> understanding that can only come from God - I
> listen. But when someone tries to impress with
> big words and complicated semantics. Oh well!
> To each his own.
I think what you said here identifies the root problem that exis
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
David, here is one of the quotes that indicates this:
Brigham Young speaking in the Journal of Discourses Vo1 1, Page 51
1852, "Jesus our Elder Brother was begotten in the flesh by the same
character that was in the garden of Eden, and who is our Father in
Hea
"Scripturese" what is it? You quote a scripture to
me then, without using any language apart from it I then quote a scripture back
to you in response. Once we use our own (not Scripture's) words we're not only
having a conversation we're engaging in theological dialogue. Is there a word
othe
Lance: If the Bereans did other than speak "Scripturese" to each
other then they also were engaging in theology Judy.
jt: How do you define what you call "scripturese"
Lance?
How do you discern between good and evil? What is
your
plumbline or standard of measure?
Lance wrote:When you ad
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Hi kids,
can we say the word polemicist?
jt: What for? Only the sophisticated will
hear ...
Lance wrote:When you add a single supplementary, explanatory word to
the Scriptures you cite you're a Female Theologian. OO Scarry kids!
Lance
jt: I don'
I do, Judy. I just don't think that you've apprehended Paul's meaning here.
When I sat in a pew some decades ago listening to A W Tozer preach
(one with not much more education than your Father) I never thought
then nor now of being attentive to a man in the place of God. For
that
matte
If the Bereans did other than speak "Scripturese"
to each other then they also were engaging in theology Judy. Blessings,
Lance Jt (TT=Judy Taylor The Theologian)
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 02, 2004 09:18
Subject: [T
John S. wrote:
> Let's start over.
Ok.
John S. wrote:
> Since I was explaining my understanding on the
> grammatical application of the present tense,
> I did not and do not see it necessary to finding
> a translation that actually says "If we say we
> are having no sin ..." I made n
Hi kids, can we say the word
polemicist?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 02, 2004 09:18
Subject: [TruthTalk] Doctrines of
Men(Women?)/Demons
Lance wrote:
When you add a single supplementary, explanatory
David, here is one of the quotes that indicates this:
Brigham Young speaking in the Journal of Discourses Vo1 1, Page 51 1852,
"Jesus our Elder Brother was begotten in the flesh by the same character
that was in the garden of Eden, and who is our Father in Heaven."
I read "begotten in the flesh
STURDY PIONEERS OF WAYNE COUNTY
EULOGIZED BY Z. T. VINSON
IN REMARKABLE WORD PICTURE
Uncle" John Jarrell
The first truly great man I ever knew was John Jarrell, who lived and
died on Mill Creek. Every one, young and old alike, called him "Uncle,"
out of a sense of profound respect and reverence. H
I do, Judy. I just don't think that you've
apprehended Paul's meaning here. When I sat in a pew some decades ago listening
to A W Tozer preach (one with not much more education than your Father) I never
thought then nor now of being attentive to a man in the place of God.For that
matter neit
Lance wrote:
When you add a single supplementary, explanatory
word to
the Scriptures you cite you're a Female Theologian.
OO Scarry kids! Lance
jt: I don't think so Lance; today ppl all have access
to the scriptures
so they can be Berean (Acts 11:17); there was a day
(dark ages)
wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated
4/1/2004 11:46:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are literally
brothers and sisters of God, and have the manifest destiny (and
encouragement) to become like Him.
So the God we serve is not the main guy?
Lance: An
underlying anger towards MEN particularly EDUCATED MEN.
I, with you thank
God for your Dad and men like him. Did you only go to the 4th grade.
jt:
No I was more educated than my father-in-law but ignorant as to what
counted
in
life when I met him.
Do you recommend
all to
Lance: When you add a single supplementary,
explanatory word to the Scriptures
you cite you're a Female Theologian. OO Scarry
kids! Lance
jt: I don't think so Lance, everyone
is responsible to check out what they hear
themselves just as the Bereans did in
Acts 11:17; Paul called t
An underlying anger towards MEN particularly
EDUCATED MEN. I, with you thank God for your Dad and men like him. Did you only
go to the 4th grade. Do you recommend all to cease formal education at that
level? You seem to equate GODLY EDUCATED MEN as espousers of doctrines of
demons. Right/Wro
In a message dated 4/2/2004 5:12:37 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"The same guy that named that Rottweiler Jesus", replied the bird
Good one.
John
In a message dated 4/2/2004 4:17:03 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We refer everything to God and nothing to ourselves.
But we cannot escape our own sense of reality --- so there is alasy the naging feeling of doubt (?)
John
In a message dated 4/2/2004 3:19:09 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Appeal must be made beyond all Biblical, all ecclesiastical citations to the Truth of God Himself. For that (He) is the supreme authority to which (whom) all must submit and all must rely.Ultimately it is by
Lance:I've known more smart women than men over my
rather lengthy life,
including my wife so, please include women.
jt: How many big thick doctrinal
books have you seen or do you know of
that are written by
women?
Strictly guessing, I'd say that a high percentage
of believers globally
In a message dated 4/1/2004 11:46:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are literally brothers and sisters of God, and have the manifest destiny (and encouragement) to become like Him.
So the God we serve is not the main guy?
John
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
