Bob you said the light entering the field would regain its original
characteristics upon exiting - which I agree with but it does suggest some
interesting experiments of a different nature, shaped and nested fields of
electromagnets or electrostatics [maybe both] with variable spacing [focus]
Ron, nice citation, supports relativistic interpretations as a factor in all
these anomalies, Podkletnov’s spinning superconductor comes to mind first, then
Jan Naudts paper on relativistic hydrogen, then Shawyers EM drive but beyond
that I think it may provide the math we need to understand
Eric, it seems likely that any gas atoms that can migrate into the
required nano geometry should also shrink… so helium should do fine but I don’t
know about metal atoms which might need plasma temperatures and that would seem
to threaten the standard skeletal catalyst or nano powders,
Jones,, I still think it is space time accelerating the decay due to Casimir
geometry but.. close enough!
Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 3:50 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Conservation of miracles
From: Eric Walker
Axil, considering this thread in conjunction with Calvert’s 5D windows it
almost suggests that a magnetic field in or around the reactor becomes more
confining if nested inside a magnetic shielding material than just a magnetic
field alone [ was Parkhov’s iron pot closed?] – Jones has often
Axil, I am glad you included the tachyon because it embraces relativistic
effects and would explain some of the odd radiation measurement claims made a
short distance from the reactor while not detectable at or within the reactor
wall as mentioned in a recent thread. Jones recently cited
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/01/tech/super-diamond-q-carbon-scientists-laser/index.html
These extra dimensions are encountered inside Casimir regions, they result in
both time dilation and spatial contractions. equal and opposite reactions can
now include Lorentzian transformations where spatial displacement is traded for
temporal displacement which is why we get both ZPE and
Axil, you are connecting a lot of dots in a very plausible arrangement! It also
reinforces your conviction wrt Papp noble gases forming mobile NAE, I might
suggest the frequency increase of SPP thru the light spectrum although related
to power would be more directly related to the confinement
Axil, welcome to my limb, great company but hope we don’t fall :_) When you
said [snip] This experiment can provide a time comparison profile of how the
flow of time is increased by positive vacuum energy as a function of distance
traveled by the LENR reaction products from the zero point of
Axil, Jones,
Good insights and dot connecting, would it apply to Patterson beads
submerged in water with a lithium sulfate (Li2SO4) electrolyte solution?
(Li2SO4) vs palladium chloride absorption of UV? His claim that it would
neutralize radiation without emitting harmful
http://news.vanderbilt.edu/2015/11/quantum-dots-made-from-fool%E2%80%99s-gold-boost-battery-performance/
all the regular characters Fe, Li plus Sulphur at the nano geometries we are
concerned with.
vacuum energy is positively
amplified. Time outside the vortex moves faster than normal in a equalized
vacuum were positive and negative vacuum energies are equal.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Roarty, Francis X
<francis.x.roa...@lmco.com<mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>> wrote:
Jones, nice conjecture but how do we explain achieving more containment than a
diamond anvil? Does quantum effect also divide down physical containment such
that these magnetic fields won't simply push away the fe oxides and/or geometry
sustaining active sites? Does this theory better support
Guys, I watched the lecture and it was good and yes I can also understand why
Jones see this terminology as a distraction – too many people immediately focus
on the mass and gravitational effect as being only macro and even Jones admits
“Sure, there is a tiny minimum mass for black holes to
Bob, I think here again is where the Jan Naudt’s paper on relativistic hydrogen
applies to the hydrinos and Rydberg atoms the same. You asked “? How do you
ascribe mass density to something only one atomic layer thick? “ IMHO the
hydrogen atom morphs with changes in ether density provided by
Bob, I agree with Miley’s assessment [snip] Miley does not believe the
ultra-dense form of hydrogen is something that forms on a surface or can exist
in the air. He thinks it is a form that exists interstitially inside a metal or
metal nanoparticle. [/snip]. I also think some preprocessing
I just hope they aren’t doing this anomalously, do we know who keeps changing
it back and who to hold accountable?
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 10:07 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Skeptics at Rational Wiki cannot be
berson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 10:20 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium
Fran, are you thinking that this is a form of zero point energy?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X
<fran
I think confusion will continue to reign for as long as researchers continue to
attribute the energy levels solely to the atom instead of in combination with
the dynamic Casimir environment through which it is randomly moving. IMHO
molecular bonds formed in these regions have a non spatial
Upgraded model testing in process.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/11/nasa-eagleworks-has-tested-upgraded.html
From: Roarty, Francis X<mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 3:30 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: [Vo]:EM drive at NASA
Upgraded model testing in process.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/11/nasa-eagleworks-has-tested-upgraded.html
sion.
[Thumbnail]<http://hiqnews.megafoundation.org/imageA91.JPG>
See below for further study on this subject:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/negativeenergy/negativeenergy.htm
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Roarty, Francis X
<francis.x.roa...@lmco.com<mailto:francis
he key with MiHsC...
Future will say. the simplest would be that it is an artifact, but that won't
be funny, and Nature likes fun.
2015-11-03 16:51 GMT+01:00 Roarty, Francis X
<francis.x.roa...@lmco.com<mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>>:
Yes, I respect goat guys’ comments even though he i
p.
Bob Cook
From: Roarty, Francis X<mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:08 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
[snip] But in effect, if the hydrogen does not escape, the energy which
This also fits reports of life after death lab explosions
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:10 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
A comment on the THE FLEISCHMANN SINGULARITY as a clue to
Jones, I've never thought that the underlying force would be otherwise. Still
suspect everyone underrates the energy potential of vacuum engineering. The
window you mention of 2 to 12 nm may be where the most energy exchange occurs
but I am convinced that fractional hydrogen can continue to
[snip] But in effect, if the hydrogen does not escape, the energy which can be
extracted by chemistry is endless (if the source is the quantum vacuum).[/snip]
which is why I tend to call it zero point energy since it is effectively
harnessing random motion to move the hydrogen between the DCE
, October 21, 2015 8:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:OT? breakthrough in 2-D lasers
From: Roarty, Francis X
http://www.rdmag.com/news/2015/10/exciting-breakthrough-2-d-lasers
Ø Among the most talked about class of materials in the world of
nanotechnology today are 2-D
http://www.rdmag.com/news/2015/10/exciting-breakthrough-2-d-lasers
Among the most talked about class of materials in the world of nanotechnology
today are 2-D transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs). These 2-D
semiconductors offer superior energy efficiency and conduct electrons much
faster
show no carbon remaining in the ash sample
of the 100 micron nickel particle.
These nano cavities play a role in the continuing production of hydrogen
rydberg matter as time goes on in the Rossi reaction.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Roarty, Francis X
<francis.x.roa...@lmco.
Axil, does the hydrogen have to desorb from the surface of the Ni? I liked
everything you were saying to that point but still think the surface and
lattice are needed to form inverse Rydberg hydrogen. I agree lack of oxygen or
any reactive gases is key so the path of least resistance, covalent
Guys,
Did the Papp engine need to be cranked like an ICE? If so I am thinking
mechanical energy is the bootstrap source of energy. The noble gases forming
menisci around other, plasma forming gases, that collapse rapidly as the
engine is cranked like bubbles in sonoluminesce. The alpha emitter
I think the energy source is zero point , the down stoke compressing the noble
gases into layers of flat menisci surrounding other exotic gases that react to
the collapsing menisci like moving Casimir plates. Effectively changing their
inertial frame via vacuum engineering. … IMHO :_)
Fran
Ok… but in this particular case….. dun,dun, dun, d, dona dun dun. :_)
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:48 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:The sounds of LENR
The sounds produce by the LENR reaction may be coming from Bosenova events
Thanks Bob,
Your’s is a very reasonable well thought out opinion ☺ It rings true!
Fran
From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 8:01 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]: Opinion on Rossi-IH WO publication
Despite calls for replication
Axil, much better said than my relativistic warp via confinement but we are on
the same page. IMHO even catalytic action is a weak form of this mechanism. I
think catalysis is just the rate of change in low level dilation due to the
tapestry of geometry in active regions. I think LENR is
Makes me wonder if Lorentzian contracted particles can bypass 3d macro objects
thru 4th dimensional displacement… slipping along the walls of our 3d ant farm.
Not exactly the relativistic basketball and the eye of a needle question where
you can’t get the eye to face out on the time axis but
Axil, the math is fine but IMHO we need to consider equivalent acceleration
where the region of space the hydrogen is passing thru is a warp and the entire
atom undergoes Lorentzian contraction becoming relativistic NOT JUST THE
ELECTRON. You and I are not expending energy to move at
, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.commailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Axil, the math is fine but IMHO we need to consider equivalent acceleration
where the region of space the hydrogen is passing thru is a warp and the entire
atom undergoes Lorentzian
Interesting... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150729085920.htm
Kevin,
The ZPE perspective conserves miracles making vacuum engineering
the underlying bootstrap of both anomalies. Puthoff coined the phrase vacuum
engineering, ..You have Shawyer at the macro scale DRIVING the vacuum to
relativistic conditions with microwaves to segregate and
EM drive is claimed to be relativistic so by making a closed system in our
frame, [his trapezoidal microwave cavity], you are using Lorentzian effects to
unbalance the normal equal and opposite reactions in our frame.. of course in
the case of LENR the hydrogen never see it that way because it
From EurekaAlert
citationhttp://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-07/pm-wfs071415.php
[snip] The size of the condensate is a limiting factor In addition to directly
observing the organic polariton condensate's wavelike behaviour, the experiment
showed researchers that ultimately the
Axil, better said and provides a nice theoretical foundation for the
relativistic theory of Casimir effect. Thank you! Only thing I would suggest is
you’re your formula accommodate the exposure ratio of the radioactive
population to the active regions.. since the most active regions are the
IMHO hydrno moleules with Li must remain a gas or plasma where the shrunken
hydrogen only exists as a function of the surrounding geometry therefore the
molecule is free to drift thru the geometry and also provides a
disassociating force when the geometry lessens and the contracted
I would not be surprised if these vortices were present sealing the inner walls
of Casimir cavities helping to evacuate the larger virtual particles that are
suppressed out of the cavity in a sort of push pull arrangement. Even my
relativistic perspective where the larger VP are still present
Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 10:33 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Fractional Hydrogen without Mills
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Tue, 7 Jul 2015 00:19:39 +:
Hi,
[snip]
I agree.. closed
I agree.. closed form being a canoe stuck in the waterfall of our 3D plane all
the rest is the medium of time passing thru it.
Fran
IMO, all energy is motion in the substance of the vacuum. When that motion
occurs in a closed form, the result is a particle. This was also Fred Sparber's
point of
Bob,
I don’t agree with [snip] Second, in the DDL state the electron
is moving at relativistic speeds and has a mass increase due to this, so
perhaps it could afford to shed mass energy. [/snip] IMHO relativistic hydrogen
in a lattice is a function of Casimir suppression and the
Robin said [snip] This is perhaps because it's the electron the shrinks, while
the assumption is
made that the proton is constant.
This would result in a p value for the maximum energy release in my model of 119
and a matching energy of 102 keV. [/snip]
Robin... and what value if both electron
Axil, If either or both entangled particles are part of a bulk material it will
be too subtle to detect because they will cancel with other pairs having
opposite vectors. IMHO you need to group/orient quantities of entangled
particles to accumulate a measurement detectable on our macro scale.
Matt,
The fields are all quickly starting to grow together..[snip] lithium ions to
chemically break the metal oxide catalyst into smaller and smaller
pieces.Breaking down metal oxide into tiny particles increases its surface
area and exposes lots of ultra-small, interconnected grain boundaries
I agree, Jones is on the right track! [snip] LENR provides a substitute gravity
field in lattice confinement.[/snip] everything being relative the tiny warps
created by geometry change vacuum density even more rapidly than a gravity well
limited by square law.. IMHO it opens even more
http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/prevens/flow1.pdf
flow electrification is much closer to LENR than is the EM drive, IMHO.
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X
I maintain that Rossi's E- Cat and Shawyer's EM drive are both based on
Cavity QED. In Zofia Birula 1996 paper
http
I maintain that Rossi's E- Cat and Shawyer's EM drive are both based on Cavity
QED. In Zofia Birula 1996 paper
http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf she describes
Rydberg atoms with modified spontaneous emissions by virtue of microwave cavity
suppression. In the interim
Dave, Good argument BUT one thought to consider is what if this heating coil
self destruct is the primary failure for large COP LENR experiments. This would
make the experiment worthwhile in that it would immediately open the door to
scaling the heating value beyond the microwaves ability as a
Strange thought.. could “interphasal resonance” be the tail on a zero point
kite?
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 10:06 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:The good, the bad and the ugly
Harvey,
As the world’s leading (and possibly
BUT!!! If this is new physics how do you differentiate between disinformation
and new physics. IMHO the only explanation for the mouse activating the
driverless cat would be new or exotic physics. It could be that COE breaks down
between disparate inertial frames that we simply can’t observe at
Thank you curiousone for your question and obtaining Rossi reply[snip] No, the
charge is the same, we have only one charge in that kind of reactor by the way:
if the ssm is not adopted, the distinction between Cat and Mouse
vanishes.[/snip]
When Rossi says that without ssm there is no
What do we know about the cat and mouse architecture? Would a single Ni block
with multiple reactor tunnels drilled through be equivalent ? assuming we only
heat central tunnel and down regulate it’s tap into the hydrogen manifold
feeding other tunnels the claims that the secondary tunnels will
Axil, I am ok with an EMF based backbone but I think the “path” in a condensate
might also rely on the “spooky action at a distance” you suggested in a
previous thread [or for some perspectives relativistic] and measurements by the
control loop may be effecting the past to keep the e-cat from
Axil, entanglement and the future directing the past might be part of the
barrier to LENR theory. All control loops are based on normal linear time and
no one is even suggesting instantaneous control or spooky action at a distance
much less strategic posttest measurements that could be used to
Alberto, the series current is constant thru both but the loaded reactor
heating coil becomes shunted by the plasma environment . E^2/R is going to be
different and the power distribution will be different – I am sure they are
aware of this and they may be on to something but I have to disagree
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/a15773/shape-shifting-metal-alloy/
I wonder if similar alloy could be forcing a reshape during the PWM of Rossi
and others?
Axil,
I think there is much room for improvement with any cooling
scheme that increases heat sinking to the skin of the reactor since the device
can overheat and self-destruct faster than the heat sinking can propagate into
the reactor [keeping us forever at this narrow window
Nice citation Peter, above liquid nitrogen already in just the proof of concept
is very encouraging - already bringing down costs for the exotic and perhaps
renewed hope for a room temperature variant.
Fran
From: B P Chin [mailto:telemachu...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 1:23 AM
Had a strange thought at dinner wrt C and photons, I may be stating the obvious
in my own working man's terms but here it is. Time is a real dimension mediated
by virtual particles. Regardless of what rate these particles intersect with
our 3D plane, we will perceive this rate as C, like a
?
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.commailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Had a strange thought at dinner wrt C and photons, I may be stating the obvious
in my own working man’s terms but here it is. Time is a real dimension mediated
by virtual
] responsible for the cavity
provides gamma screening.
Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 2:34 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the
Theoretical Limit
Dear Francis X,
I am coming around to your way
at 2:33 AM, Axil Axil
janap...@gmail.commailto:janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Francis X,
I am coming around to your way of thinking.
Regarding...
“when lasers were fired through the EmDrive’s resonance chamber, some of the
beams appeared to travel faster than the speed of light. If that’s true
receive the
realativistic levels of dilation.
Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 2:34 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the
Theoretical Limit
Dear Francis X,
I am coming around to your way of thinking
to a
huge amount. This amplification is done through SPP asymmetric coupling, where
a large soliton feeds energy superconductively into a series of smaller
solitons...like a transformer.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.commailto:francis.x.roa
Axil, I not only agree but even suspect these increased positive vacuum zones
would be subject to time dilation similar to the paradox twin in a deep gravity
well. Your focus on positive vacuum pressure was insightful ;; I may have been
wrongly focused on the negative zones due to my pet
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150513093609.htm
We don't know enough to answer the question because we don't know enough about
the origin of the force. Even if it is relativistic as Shawyer claims and the
spatial area occupied by the device modifies the encompassed inertial frames
that breach the isotropy there remains a strong likelihood
Bob,
Your asked [snip] Is it a frequency associated with the wave
length of the incoming proton in a frame of reference of the Li
nucleus?[/snip]… great question.. and what if that frame of reference is based
on negative acceleration? Naudts 2005 paper proposed that hydrinos in
Hi Jones, good insight regarding anomalous zero point linkage thru Lithium. I
have always maintained that these two fields are related and that a zero point
explanation for anomalous heat will be a two for one breakthrough allowing the
effect to be scaled up and optimized to provide energy AND
Robin,
Ok, but I would assume the thrust vector is constant relative to the device
not related to the direction of orbit..or are you suggesting the force is
limited to exploiting ambient gravitational field [eliminating applications
for extra-solar propulsion?
Fran
-Original Message-
Nice citation Axil, It doesn’t indicate whether the device was sealed so I will
assume it was not and that my theory requiring ambient gases loaded into the
cavity lattice were wrong. I still think the basis is relativistic and that
mainstream supposition that the ether is frameless has at
-time
IF the problem is the energy content of the battery during shipment, the
manufacturer should leave the battery uncharged until it is in the hands of the
customer.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.commailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
http
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150428125253.htm
I like it!
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 4:51 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Creating an inventory of Fractional Lithium f/Li+
In a previous posting - the hypothesis of a version of LENR which is based on
interactions of the
Axil, nice citation! I like the use of nano engineered holes in the Casimir
plates, perhaps a method of self assembly could produce these geometries in
aligned arrays – It kind of eliminates the difficulty DiFiore et all had with
seeking gravitational anomalies in the early 2k with stacked
IMHO it is a warp but it is exactly balanced by segregation of regions [nano
warps and nano wells] such that the net change is zero for the macro area where
these regions exist. This segregation is how the EM side steps the unattainable
energy calculated to create a macro sized warp [the
Axil,
IMHO you could tie this together with anomalous radioactive
decays and the Shawyer drive.. it would make sense that many of these anomalous
claims share the same underlying explanation .. I think vacuum density is the
variable and perhaps degrees of saturation is the
...relativistic hydrogen. Shaken not stirred... I mean warped not welled.
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:55 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat,
co-author Andrea Rossi
-Original
I would be surprised if the paths outlined in their paper were not already
suggested here on vortex since… according to Rossi we only sit back and make
countless guesses without ever studying or investing in actual experiment … I
think he is feeling the heat on his toes now and casting
In Italy the title ‘Dr’ does not imply a PhD or medical degree, but only a
basic (undergraduate) degree.
From: a.ashfield [mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net]
Sent: 07 April 2015 22:20
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
On 3/26 Eric Walker said [snip] Continuing the analogy, what is the medium
against which the system of charged elements is alleged to exert force by
exploiting effects of relativity? [/snip]
Eric in velocity derived relativistic effects there is no connection between
inertial frames such that
I have taken this position previously but not wrt relative motion, AFIK there
isn't any relative motion in these type of drives but I agree that shape is a
big part of it in that it unbalances the reflected RF trapped inside the
container in a nonspatial way from the perspective of an observer
Would this employ the output heat of multiple reactors to reduce the required
heat from any of the internal heating elements? My thought is any external heat
is going to trip the feedback loop sooner and be a wash.
Fran
From: Alberto De Souza [mailto:alberto.investi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday,
[snip] But maybe these tubercles serve a function at relatively low
temperatures, then as the reaction takes hold, the tubercles are mostly
distorted and destroyed. But the function that these tubercles are meant to
serve have been put in place and are independent once established and self
Unless u really worked hard.. then release it as a Master Beta :_)
From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:35 PM
To: John Milstone
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Addendum to Murphy's Law
Release it as a beta.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
Bob,
One advantage not mentioned was on geometry, nature opposes
construction of Casimir geometry in bulk powders and skeletal cats… this method
is far easier than leaching aluminum out of a nickel alloy or counting on
stiction forces to maintain the powder in bulk form .. It
, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.commailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Thanks Bob, that is great information but I still have a nagging concern that
thermal loading is more important than anyone is currently aware and that XH
needs an environment that is robustly subtracting heat away from
, and vent the system before opening the
reactor post-experiment.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2WU9MR3hyQ2NIWkEauthuser=0
As Bob Greenyer likes to do, he has dubbed this system in ASCII as {Garbage
Can}.
Bob
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa
the reactor viewable through this port if a high temperature
window is used (probably multiple) to keep the heat loss down. Mica might be
an acceptable window, which doesn't melt until 1200C. It is also low mass to
pass the radiations.
Bob
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Roarty, Francis X
Good Points Bob and taken with Axil’s reply re arc gap vs RF by Rossi begs a
question.. how hard would it be to design and monitor an array of experiments
inside a single reactor tube.. stepped or tapered mini cells inside a single
tube with a variable exterior thermal gradient – metrics could
of hydrogen isotopes and for He.
Bob
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.commailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Good Points Bob and taken with Axil’s reply re arc gap vs RF by Rossi begs a
question.. how hard would it be to design and monitor an array
101 - 200 of 1323 matches
Mail list logo