Hi,
I'm looking for a small device capable of at least DC voltage and temp
monitoring with snmp for monitoring remote solar powered sites.
I've found this http://www.akcpinc.com/company/sensorProbe2.htm but
wondering if anyone has any suggestions.
Thanks!
Steve
--
WISPA Wireless List
ie Reeves wrote:
>> > On 4/19/07, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> as Patrick Henry once said
>> >>
>> >> "Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated."
>> >>
>> >
>> > Who is Patric
as Patrick Henry once said
"Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated."
--
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
> All nicely stated.
>
> So, what do you think we should be DOING?
>
> Marlon
> (509) 982-2181
> (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
> 42846865 (icq)
to believe that all their phone conversations and all
their web traffic was being spied upon, they might change their habits.
Good day!
Steve
-
Peter R. wrote:
> Two quick thoughts:
>
> 1) If it was so easy to encrypt, more would do so. These things are to
> catch the mastermind genius,
I've been using zabbix effectively for those purposes.
Does a good job, has nice template control, soon is supposed to support
auto discovery.
Steve
--
Jory Privett wrote:
> I am looking some a software package that does network monitoring and
> graphing. I have used MRTG for grap
considerations and the cost factor.
Thanks.
Steve
--
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
> I don't know what equiopment you use... but... here's a scenario...
>
> 20 dbm radios...15 db panel on one side and a 32 db solid dish on the
> other. At 15 miles, you should have a -68
tem SHOULD be illegal is irrelevant.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 18, 2007, at Feb 18 09:07 PM, wispa wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:52:04 -0800, Patrick Leary wrote
George, ones person's "innovation" is something that might another
person nothing but migraines. If you think you ge
ause they're "inconvenient" or simply irritating... and
you're deciding that you're not going to buy Alvarion gear because of
that??? Like I said, your competitors thank you for making bad
business choices so that they won't have to compete with you much
long
cess story for Broadband Wireless
Internet Access.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 16, 2007, at Feb 16 11:38 PM, wispa wrote:
I'd say that that's probable. Further, I'd say that at least 75%
of those
who did or do not don't even know about it. Especially, if you're
a no
anies that offer radio systems, however - not merely
radio modules.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 16, 2007, at Feb 16 05:41 AM, David Peterson wrote:
Sorry for the old reference, Ultramesh is no long with us. I only
consult
at this time. I noticed some companies on your list that are not
se
--> Vecima Networks, I
don't think Charles made the transition.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 16, 2007, at Feb 16 09:25 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
Well, for sure this industry never stands still does it Steve? As one
fond of change, that one of the things I most enjoy. I knew from
people
there th
e benefit of the doubt.
Eion Wireless assumed the product line of the late Wi-LAN, so it's
not surprising that there are no certs yet under their name.
I'll remove GIL Technology and Qorvus and ask for clarification if
their systems are certified.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 15, 2007, at
a
potential purchaser.
Non-US WISPs... I hear you, and in all fairness, I had not previously
considered your position that the at-times-inane-FCC rules are
largely irrelevant to you. I'm thinking about this.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 15, 2007, at Feb 15 09:09 PM, Mac Dearman wrote:
So Stev
Patrick:
I couldn't find a reference for Optimax that related to Broadband
Wireless Internet Access.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 15, 2007, at Feb 15 07:19 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
Also...is Optimax still around? That was cool stuff
Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, I
off to Kyocera.
Good point on Terabeam; it was deleted and Proxim added.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 15, 2007, at Feb 15 07:17 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
Steve, here are a few off my head that are not there...Freewave, MDS,
Lightpointe is with an "e" on the end, Wave Wireless (forme
Good Idea,
Count me in,
Steve
--
www.lyttonnet.com
Carl A jeptha wrote:
> Please contact me offlist to see if we can have our own chapter under
> the WISPA Umbrella
>
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
use. An additional caveat is that
I won't knowingly list systems that are not FCC certified.
Thanks for any help you can offer to make this a better, more
complete list.
Thanks,
Steve
---
Steve Stroh
425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Writing about BWIA again! - www.bwianews.
Brian:
Amateur Radio processes was one of the mental models I used in my
proposal. You were right on in noting the similarities.
Thanks,
Steve (N8GNJ)
On Feb 8, 2007, at Feb 8 09:55 AM, Brian Webster wrote:
Steve,
What you are suggesting here is very similar to what the ham
ting suspected
illegal, high-profile operations in violation of FCC Part 15 rules.
The FCC doesn't have the resources for wild-goose chases, but if you
really do your homework and the FCC can be reasonably sure that they
won't be wasting their time, then they are much more likely t
that, it makes more sense to do wired, and if you're doing
wired, just put in an Ethernet jack.
Of course, some sharpie is going to use the wired connection to
provide Wi-FI to the rest of the plane. It's two clicks on my Mac
laptop.
Thanks,
Steve
On Jan 27, 2007, at Jan 27 0
lternately in wonderment
and dismay at the WISP industry. This is one of them.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 6, 2007, at Feb 6 12:47 PM, John Scrivner wrote:
Patrick, what is Alvarion doing as a corporation to police the
majority of BWIA vendors who now pollute our industry with
uncertified gea
ites (all of this is very much a work in progress).
It's also a bit early to mention this, but enough of the pieces are
in place to say this much- Wireless Tech Radio is coming back. More
in a few weeks.
Thanks,
Steve
On Jan 24, 2007, at Jan 24 10:12 AM, John Scrivner wrote:
Ste
ion broadcast spectrum
sufficiently to prevent future reallocation (for at least another
decade or so).
Intel, Microsoft, Cisco are some of the names being bandied about as
advocates for license-exempt use of white space television broadcast
spectrum.
Thanks,
Steve
On Jan 24, 2007,
d spectrum.)
I'll answer the last question on another post.
Thanks,
Steve
On Jan 24, 2007, at Jan 24 10:12 AM, John Scrivner wrote:
I knew there was an 802.22 effort but I had no idea that it was
geared for any particular spectrum until now. Glad to hear the
efforts are underway.
You've HAD offers that have been refused...
Thanks,
Steve
On Jan 24, 2007, at Jan 24 07:10 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
WISPA has been working on this for a couple of years now.
Independently and with Cisco, New America, Media Access Project and
I've recently had talk
off easy with a $20,000 fine. Their entire
network could have been summarily shut down if the FCC felt that they
were causing interference with a licensed service, not to mention
that the FCC can request arrest and forfeiture of offenders.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 1, 2007, at Feb 1 07:32
all the nice graphs I want, capable of producing network maps.
seems capable of scaling nicely. so far so good
Steve
--
W.D.McKinney wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To:
> 'WISPA General List' [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Se
John:
There IS an IEEE standard in the works for the TV whitespaces -
802.22 - http://www.ieee802.org/22/
Thanks,
Steve
On Jan 24, 2007, at Jan 24 07:55 AM, John Scrivner wrote:
The standard (as far as how gear can operate in the bands) has been
created through the NPRM known as 04
windows more
than 20' away.
Thanks,
Steve
On Jan 22, 2007, at Jan 22 10:49 AM, Travis Johnson wrote:
Matt,
It's funny you posted this message today I just picked up a new
"test" phone I am trying to replace my Treo 650. I grabbed an HP
iPaq 6945 from Cingul
or
client software.
Thanks!
Steve
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Have you installed software such as fail2ban which will block the ip
address after n number of failed ssh logins for n number of seconds.
Depending on the purpose of the server it may block internet access for
the client, but I wouldn't worry about that for my network.
I have it installed on all my
I have two commercial sites in Normal, IL looking
for coverage. Please hit me off list. Thanks.
Steve Carter
AIRbaud Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/326 - Release Date
Yes, it is a required step in applying for a grant/loan from RUS. This is
your opportunity to let RUS know you exist, which from last time I looked at
it made the applicant must less likely to get the grant/loan if you already
provide in the area they are asking for help in.
Steve Smith
Chase
http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=66
Can anyone tell me anything about this auction?
Steve Smith
Chase 3000
Imperial, NE
69033
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
308 882-3000
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subsc
censed spectrum going completely unused. That
particular groups cannot make use of that vacant spectrum... THAT is a
real problem that has yet to be effectively addressed.
Thanks,
Steve
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Patrick Leary wrote:
> "A secondary flaw is that you read into the "spirit
arion's prime responsibility is to it's
stockholders, and as such it has to invest its resources "safely", which
probably means that it can't "place bets" as it once was more free to do.
But again, that just leaves more room for new entrants or other companies
s
lots of room for smaller players - Tropos, SkyPilot Networks, BelAir
Networks, etc., all offering ample innovation and good performance in
providing a service that the conventional wisdom says that wasn't
possible.
Thanks,
Steve
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Patrick Leary wrote:
> Tom,
>
&g
WISP-related lists in a long time - it elevated the SNR.
Thanks,
Steve
On Apr 12, 2006, at 17:28, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Steve, excellent points. except... (also see inline)
By your definition of Carrier grade, I could argue that many WISPs
that just so happen not to use Alvarion, may very wel
e-exempt, fixed and mobile,
high-capacity and low-capacity, etc. Alvarion has very capable
competitors in various segments, but I can't think of any company that
competes head-to-head with Alvarion in all segments, even Airspan.
Thanks,
Steve
On Apr 11, 2006, at 20:51, John Scrivner wrote:
Motorola designed Canopy specifically for the WISP market, not the
carrier market.
Alvarion designed VL specifically for the carrier market, not the WISP
market.
Thanks,
Steve
On Apr 11, 2006, at 18:55, Dylan Oliver wrote:
How is any product qualified as 'Carrier-Grade'?
the features of
Enveloc, EVault, US Data Trust, etc., but without the price tag.
I'll probably end up using rsync, but I was hoping to find something that
has a web interface for clients to retrieve their own files, monitors
directories for changes in near real-time, etc. Ideally it would a
;WiMAX" capabilities, and don't care
about interoperability... you've waited several years longer than you
needed to.
Thanks,
Steve
On Apr 5, 2006, at 09:02, Matt Liotta wrote:
The entire point of WiMAX may be interoperability, but from a fixed
wireless standpoint interoper
tire POINT of WiMAX is interoperability!
The market is going to have to sort out the vendors who falsely claim
"WiMAX" for their systems; apparently the WiMAX Forum has no intention
of doing so.
Thanks,
Steve
On Apr 4, 2006, at 21:37, Jeffrey Thomas wrote:
That is correct, howev
of
the Mobile portions of the WiMAX industry.
5.8 GHz WiMAX is kind of an afterthought at the moment for the WiMAX
industry.
Thanks,
Steve
On Apr 4, 2006, at 11:37, jeffrey thomas wrote:
George,
Yes there is. Airspan and Aperto both have products and are taking
orders now.
-
Jeff
On
al 180 MHz in 6 MHz increments.
Thanks,
Steve
On Mar 28, 2006, at 09:46, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Understood. But it is only 50 mhz. How much is itfs? How much is
mmds? How much was the new 5.4 gig band?
Part of what we're looking for is the WHOLE TV band.
I remember Patri
> You should be able to get accuracy to 20 feet
> or better in most situations.
I routinely get <15' accuracy with my GPSMAP 60C. 9' is not uncommon. The
best I've seen it was last weekend, when I had 6' accuracy while out in
the desert east of San Diego.
I'm a big Garmin fan. Both GPS units I'
uot;encourage" WLANs and cordless phones
to use that portion of the spectrum instead of 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz.
Thanks,
Steve
On Mar 6, 2006, at 08:47, Rick Harnish wrote:
Mac,
As far as I know, the hardware/software has to be contention based to
be
allowed to use the spectrum. I would dou
ndard connectors to unique connectors, and some
"unique" connectors became not unique enough for the FCC's taste.
I was told once what the distinction was that the FCC uses between
unique and standard RF connectors... but I was asked not to make it
public. It's amusing, and simp
;unique
connectors" at Radio Shack.
I strongly prefer a good old reliable, sturdy easy-to-weatherproof Type
N connector on outdoor gear.
Thanks,
Steve
On Jan 18, 2006, at 17:19, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Required for FCC reuirement of unique connector rule. PErsonally Ip
refer them to stay as i
-documented (here on the list) possibility that there are illegally
modified Part-15 gear radios in use.
Thanks,
Steve
On Jan 23, 2006, at 17:33, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
Maybe I am getting this wrong, but isn't Kurt just trying to do this
https://www.lastmilegear.com/catalog/product_inf
Southeast Missouri, please contact me off
list and I'll put you and the Deputy Sherriff in touch.
Thanks,
Steve
---
Steve Stroh
425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.stevestroh.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/lis
le like Kris Twomey try and explain such things to the
(W)ISP industry. Shame on that Michael Anderson for putting Kris up in
front of an audience to try to keep the WISP industry informed.
Thanks,
Steve
On Dec 28, 2005, at 06:54, John Scrivner wrote:
Can you explain this statement for me
r each
one of those links.
57-64 GHz, on the other hand, is license-exempt.
Thanks,
Steve
On Dec 27, 2005, at 18:34, John Scrivner wrote:
The day is going to happen in the "not so distant" future when there
will be CMOS based 70 to 90 Ghz radios the size of a pack of smokes.
These w
.
ANYTHING that is submitted for "official record" should really be
checked over for all the "i's" to be dotted and the "t's" to be crossed
(offered from a survivor of more than a couple "oopses" that have made
it into mass-circulation prin
From: "Bullit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: September 14, 2005 11:36:19 PDT
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Emergency-Relief] P15 UPDATE
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all
Today at noon, I was required to submit my formal Commission briefing
that was to be held tomorrow morning in Washington.
ations
and volunteer management expertise that PART-15.ORG developed in the
last week are being leveraged to help the WISPA contingent.
Choose your course.
Thanks,
Steve
On Sep 13, 2005, at 09:00, Charles Wu wrote:
Well, if you look at it - w/out WISPA's efforts, there would be
NO
mention.
Photos would be great; again, more info at the two URLs.
Please - take some time out of your activities to provide your inputs.
Thanks,
Steve
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Bullit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: September 12, 2005 18:44:38 PDT
To: <[EMAIL PR
is is Steve Stroh’s account
of the “Kelly WISP Incident”. Any errors in fact are mine. I asked
Michael Anderson for some clarification on points, and Michael knew
that I would be posting this message, but he did not have any
substantial input into what I was going to say, nor has he seen or
app
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-wireless9sep09,0,2807737.story?coll=la
-home-business
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
tely, and are well-positioned to
provide immediate, tactical support. (Yes, there is obviously some
overlap between the two.)
{end}
---
Steve Stroh
425-939-0076 | Skype: stevestroh2 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://www.stevestroh.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsu
Thanks, Rick. I'll look into it.
Steve
Rick Smith wrote:
>I use Platypus from (now) Tucows. It covers everything I need and I export
>info over to QuickBooks to do accounting stuff. I had a vision on building
>my own, even started to, but it would take too much time, and P
or MySQL.
Does anyone care to make a recommendation, or tell me ones to watch out for?
Thanks.
Steve Hansen
Bellingham, Washington
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
501 - 562 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
