On 18 Feb 2006, at 13:08, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 17 February 2006 23:54, Jim Fulton wrote:
Only you and Philipp were excited about this. Not sure that
constitutes a ringing endorsement. Maybe others will chime in now.
I'm +10 too.
I'd like to see this happen before the end of
On 16 Feb 2006, at 09:33, Roman Klesel wrote:
Hello Bruno,
bruno desthuilliers schrieb:
What's wrong with:
container.manage_addProduct['OFSP'].manage_addFile(id, file='',
title='', precondition='', content_type='', REQUEST=None)
Well, in a fs product I don't have container nor
On 15 Feb 2006, at 15:30, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
* I plan on doing the migration some time during the PyCON
conference or
sprint (24 Feb through 2 Mar). There might be a period of 1 day or so
when commits to Five won't be possible. I'll inform everyone in
advance.
Perhaps Jens
On 14 Feb 2006, at 17:58, Erik Myllymaki wrote:
I'm trying to get MailDropHost running under windows, but it errors
with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File .\maildrop.py, line 296, in ?
pid = os.fork()
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'fork'
Altering it to run
On 7 Feb 2006, at 23:58, michael nt milne wrote:
Also, just to say that I did a test on only letting authenticated
and managers view the root page of the site over ssl. If you just
cancelled the login box or closed it, the whole front page was
displayed without any css but you could still
On 8 Feb 2006, at 16:48, michael nt milne wrote:
I get a pop-up box but the superuser manager pass doesn't work.
If the superuser password is indeed set up correctly then this is a
fault of the user folder. There are some bad implementations out that
that do not respect the
On 6 Feb 2006, at 08:33, Jonathan Cleaver wrote:
I have a system which is accepting Base 64 encoded data from an
external source, due to the protocol being used at the other end
this is being passed in through a URL variable.
e.g. http://foo.bar.com?Data=uiDggGREJJytIIUicSSAa+WEhnGK
I am
On 3 Feb 2006, at 13:39, Jonathan Bowlas wrote:
--
2006-01-25T21:08:11 ERROR(200) ZODB Couldn't load state for 0x016b87
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/zope-2.7.8/lib/python/ZODB/Connection.py, line
597, in
setstate
p, serial = self._storage.load(oid,
On 3 Feb 2006, at 13:44, Khachatur Yengibaryan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send Zope mailing list submissions to
zope@zope.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
or, via email, send a message with subject
On 3 Feb 2006, at 14:00, Andrew Milton wrote:
| Any reason why you are spamming the list with the full contents of
| the digest?
I think we all know the reason d8)
I'm having a hard time with it, but I'm trying to be polite :P
jens
___
Zope
On 31 Jan 2006, at 12:02, Peter Bengtsson wrote:
That's why I, like others in this thread, don't care about refresh.
Like I mentioned elsewhere, with my setup, restarting zope is gravely
inferior to zope-restart for product development.
I'm happy to share my setup to Open Source but it's
On 31 Jan 2006, at 13:05, Peter Bengtsson wrote:
And I don't understand how Zope product refresh doesn't have a higher
attention priority when it's so useful. As far as I know, it's the
only way to make changes to a zope2 product without having to restart
the server causing downtime and lost
On 31 Jan 2006, at 14:59, Jake wrote:
I just spent a few minutes googling it and failed, but I thought I
read on
the Zope wiki that for higher trafic sites, it was better to have
bigger
caches (50,000+) and fewer threads (2).
The term high traffic site doesn't mean a thing when it comes
On 31 Jan 2006, at 15:01, Jake wrote:
http://plone.org/documentation/how-to/threads-vs-cache-size
That article contains little information to back up the conclusions,
and some of it is patently wrong. Another case of hearsay and half-
thruths being propagated by well-meaning but
On 30 Jan 2006, at 15:01, Peter Bengtsson wrote:
That's not good enough. The only thing that changed between my
development environments was the version of zope and then it stopped
working. Python product refresh is crucial to zope2 and this problem
needs to be sorted out.
I'm calling
On 30 Jan 2006, at 19:03, sharif islam wrote:
When I run zopectl start, it says daemon process started. But I get
connected refused when I try to go to port 8080. Then if I check the
process, I find zope is not running
You can get more debugging output by running it in the foreground:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 22:43, Einar Næss Jensen wrote:
how many do I need, and how will I know?
You do not need to worry about it unless you have a really unusual
setup. The default is fine for 99.9% of all situations.
jens
___
Zope maillist -
On 25 Jan 2006, at 10:42, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:11:04 -0800, Dario Lopez-Kästen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Start by checking the ZODB cache numbers in the zope-conf file
(too start simple). IIRC, the default is 5000 objects. Increase
that to, say 50.000 or so (you
On 25 Jan 2006, at 11:36, Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
Start by checking the ZODB cache numbers in the zope-conf file
(too start simple). IIRC, the default is 5000 objects. Increase
that to, say 50.000 or so (you mention that you have a busy site).
Sorry, but this is not good advice. 5000
On 25 Jan 2006, at 14:26, Chris Withers wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 24 Jan 2006, at 18:10, David Pratt wrote:
Have you tested this? The authentication machinery uses cookies,
and the browser will not send cookies that were set by the secure
login host to the unsecured sites
On 25 Jan 2006, at 17:17, michael nt milne wrote:
Just a quick question about Zope/Plone logins and security etc. When I
go to www.domain.com:8080/manage I get a login box which seems to
function in exactly the same way as the www.domain.com:8080/login_form
page.
My question is, what was the
On 25 Jan 2006, at 18:55, michael nt milne wrote:
Hi
Yeah I know the security aspects are good once you are in, however
when you login it's possible for someone to grab your logon name and
pass as it goes over the internet, as there's no encryption at all.
Then obviously login themselves and
fix broken top-quoting
On 25 Jan 2006, at 22:07, Asad Habib wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Jaroslav Lukesh wrote:
Is there any way to have multiple lines of empty space between two
sections of text in a Structured Text document? I looked on
Google but did
not find any answers to this
On 25 Jan 2006, at 22:17, martin f krafft wrote:
we're experiencing problems with certain maintenance scripts, which
just take too long to complete, so that the browser resets the
connection and Zope aborts the transaction.
I am assuming you use broken browsers that will time out, like IE?
On 25 Jan 2006, at 22:56, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.01.25.2352
+0100]:
I am assuming you use broken browsers that will time out, like IE?
Use a more suitable browser like Firefox, those don't time out by
default.
As far as I can remember
On 24 Jan 2006, at 14:30, michael nt milne wrote:
Hi
I've got a few Plone sites set-up using Apache through Zope. The
question is, I'd like to implement SSL on the site login etc, as
it's not secure without this. There's also one site I'd like to
serve completely over https. However.
On 24 Jan 2006, at 14:59, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl schrieb:
...
I don't know if making Zope serve out SSL directly helps that (I
doubt it) because I wouldn't consider using it.
No, it does not. You only add the hassle to deal with nasty zope
patches
to the scene. Only IP
On 24 Jan 2006, at 15:12, michael nt milne wrote:
Ok, thanks. The annoying thing is that I am renting a virtual
dedicated server which allows multiple domain names obviously but
not multiple IP addresses. Or it probably costs more for that. Do
you reckon SSL will ever be available for
On 24 Jan 2006, at 15:46, michael nt milne wrote:
On 1/24/06, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Jan 2006, at 15:12, michael nt milne wrote:
Ok, thanks. The annoying thing is that I am renting a virtual
dedicated server which allows multiple domain names obviously
On 24 Jan 2006, at 17:31, michael nt milne wrote:
ok, they're not technically subdomains but full domains in their
own right but served from a single server which has its own domain.
Would a wild card work with that? Would the pop-ups still be
present when a user enters the site?
This
On 24 Jan 2006, at 20:36, Alexander Limi wrote:
Check out CacheFu and it's accompanying tutorial.
http://plone.org/products/cachefu
http://plone.org/products/cachefu/documentation/how-to/crash-course
CacheFu is being used on plone.org at the moment.
Neither Zope nor Plone are proper
bugs?
The CMF Collector:http://zope.org/Collectors/CMF
is the place to report bugs (please search for existing
reports of your issue first!)
-
Jens Vagelpohl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org
On 21 Jan 2006, at 03:03, papi mac wrote:
a) Why does Zope insiist on authenticating access to the main page
and is there a way to tell it to let me access the main page (the
one that talks about Zope and lets you access manage) without a
login?
b) Does it make sense to keep trying or is
On 21 Jan 2006, at 13:02, Sune Christiansen wrote:
Hei All.
I have the following problem:
I am building up a ZCatalog and indexing my DTML methods. I use the
index
type ZCTextIndex and the object function PrincipiaSearchSource. It
works
fine.
But when I try to index my Files (type File)
On 21 Jan 2006, at 13:46, papi mac wrote:
[Ok, I'll have access to the machine on Monday and see what turns
up. What I don't understanda is why Zope would suddenly want to
authenticate access to a page that was always available to anyone.
I'll post back after checking the results.]
There
On 21 Jan 2006, at 17:46, michael nt milne wrote:
Would you know the unix syntax to assign read, write and execute
permissions to a user on a whole directory which is required for
running mkzopesintance.py under the non-root user?
I tried chgrp and chmod but couldn't get it working command
On 19 Jan 2006, at 22:55, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Currently adding roles through a RoleManager breaks ZODBRoleManager:
it reads a list of all roles when it created and assumes they do not
change after that. If you add a new role you can do that through
a RoleManager directly, but
On 17 Jan 2006, at 11:37, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting bounces of messages sent to zope@zope.org
with aparently large binary attachments. Luckily they
are too big to get thru automatically.
Looks like spammers are around and faking identities.
Is it possible to enhance the list
On 11 Jan 2006, at 21:46, Brian Sullivan wrote:
I am using CookieCrumbler as an authentication method on a Zope site.
I am looking at the feasibility of putting multi CookieCrumbler
objects (all with the same settings -- except for the cache setting)
on a site in order to allow some parts of
On 9 Jan 2006, at 13:29, Garito wrote:
13 KB deleted
Please clean up the subject line to remove your spam filter's
markings before you reply. And don't quote a whole long discussion
including countless message footers only to add one line to the bottom.
Thanks!
jens
On 8 Jan 2006, at 14:30, Daniel Gross wrote:
Hello,
I am using a linux web hosting service, who has recently installed
python into apache. Usually i install web products via ftp. After
reading how to install zope (and plone), I couldnt find a reference
how to install zope using ftp
On 8 Jan 2006, at 14:39, Daniel Gross wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 8 Jan 2006, at 14:30, Daniel Gross wrote:
Hello,
I am using a linux web hosting service, who has recently
installed python into apache. Usually i install web products via
ftp. After reading how to install zope
On 4 Jan 2006, at 13:53, Pascal Peregrina wrote:
Because I use ZEO, I got lots of often modified objects, and on
Zope servers I got lots of memory so I can give it a try ;)
Where do you see the gain? More threads and connection also means
more caches that need to be updated/invalidated
On 4 Jan 2006, at 14:11, Pascal Peregrina wrote:
So, are you telling me that the ideal configuration is using all
default values (connection objects cache size, ZEO cache size,
threads and connection pool)?
The default values for thread number and connection pool covers all
but the most
On 29 Dec 2005, at 04:53, Jamie O'Keefe wrote:
I am trying to get the latest time in a Python Script.
I declare:
from DateTime.DateTime import DateTime
But when I run:
t = DateTime().latestTime()
or
t = DateTime().Time()
I always get an Insufficient Privileges error.
Instead
Hi all,
Just got finished migrating the main repository on svn.zope.org away
from the old BDB backend to a FSFS backend. Some quick tests show me
that everything seems to be in order, including sending of commit
messages.
This means the repository is open for business again.
jens
On 23 Dec 2005, at 14:48, Jim Fulton wrote:
Jim, if you want to take a look at this new repository, it's
under / root/fakesvn.
I moved this to the normal repos area and changed the group to
the zopesvn, so that everyone with access to the old repository
should have access to this one. The
On 23 Dec 2005, at 14:57, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 23 Dec 2005, at 14:48, Jim Fulton wrote:
Jim, if you want to take a look at this new repository, it's
under / root/fakesvn.
I moved this to the normal repos area and changed the group to
the zopesvn, so that everyone with access
On 21 Dec 2005, at 16:15, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
With this upgrade in place I will do a new dry-run for the FSFS
backend migration tomorrow morning.
The test run ran through without any problems. Here's some stats:
- dumping the existing repository took 12 minutes and resulted in a
1.1 GB
that may be confounding our efforts to
run windows tests with buildbot.
Jim
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 22:08, Jim Fulton wrote:
Sounds good. I'll announce that the repo will be down for
maintenance
on the 25th,
Just FYI, during a dry run this morning I hit an obvious snag
On 21 Dec 2005, at 16:12, Jim Fulton wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'm going to go ahead with this update in hopes of resolving some
windows client problems that may be confounding our efforts to
run windows tests with buildbot.
Done
Great. I can see http://svn.zope.org works just fine.
With
On 21 Dec 2005, at 18:47, Jim Fulton wrote:
I'll note, FWIW, that we don't do installs from Zope 3 checkouts.
I think it's worth asking whether this is an important requirement.
If it is, then we should make it work. Question is, is it worth
delaying the release? I don't know.
IMHO it is an
I think you missed the point. The main reason to ditch it is the fact
that there is no one who is willing and able to support the code for
it in Zope. Just because someone comes up with a combination where
FCGI might have a benefit still does not give us a developer to
support it.
jens
On 21 Dec 2005, at 23:09, Ed Colmar wrote:
Hey All..
I'm following up on this thread after lots of different
configuration attempts, reinstalling apache2 from source, more
configuration attempts, banging my head against the wall, and
endless troubleshooting.. Unfortuantely I am still
On 20 Dec 2005, at 08:51, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
On 18. Dez 2005, at 17:58, Tim Peters wrote:
Nobody should be installing from a checkout to begin with, right?
Ok, so that's probably where we disagree then ;-)
I almost exclusively work with checkouts, and I would think many
developers
On 19 Dec 2005, at 22:08, Jim Fulton wrote:
Sounds good. I'll announce that the repo will be down for maintenance
on the 25th,
Just FYI, during a dry run this morning I hit an obvious snag: The
subversion packages on svn.zope.org are so ancient that they cannot
create FSFS backends.
On 20 Dec 2005, at 11:57, Jim Fulton wrote:
Since I cannot do any test right now for loading the dumpfile into
a FSFS-based repository I suggest doing this package upgrade
beforehand. It only takes a few minutes. I cannot make any
guarantees that nothing will break, however. The only
On 20 Dec 2005, at 12:47, Alan Milligan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jens,
I have the latest subversion-1.2.3-4 compiled for python2.3. I am
happy
to make them available to you if you wish.
Thanks for the help, Alan. I'm just going the route of least risk by
On 20 Dec 2005, at 19:47, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 20. Dezember 2005 14:27:18 -0500 Paul Winkler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just to be clear, the stuff I'm talking about is ZMI user interface
docs, not programmer docs.
I'll raise the question again: what are the benefits of the HelpSys
On 19 Dec 2005, at 12:00, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:50:19AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| There is a drawback: Debugging becomes a lot harder and sometimes
| impossible because you get no or faulty line number information in
| tracebacks and when using pdb.
|
| That isn't
On 19 Dec 2005, at 20:02, Jim Fulton wrote:
Rocky Burt wrote:
Perhaps the backend should be switched from bdb to fsfs (native
subversion backend type) ? I know it does away with a lot of these,
issues.
Yup, when someone has time to do it. AFAIK, it will involve
dumping the repository and
On 19 Dec 2005, at 21:27, Jim Fulton wrote:
IMHO the process is straightforward and easy (except for the time
it will take),
That fact alone adds complication, as that down time needs to be
scheduled.
OK, well, the only complication is setting a date really. Someone
decides and
On 19 Dec 2005, at 21:37, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
BTW, thanks for volunteering for this! It will be great not to
fool with the Berkeley DB anymore. :)
Umh, more like force-volunteered now ;) Which is fine, but in
return I'd like someone else (maybe you?) to herd the cats and come
up
On 19 Dec 2005, at 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote:
Umh, more like force-volunteered now ;) Which is fine, but in
return I'd like someone else (maybe you?) to herd the cats and
come up with a time frame where this can be done, and
communicating it. I'll do everything on the technical side.
On 19 Dec 2005, at 22:08, Tim Peters wrote:
[Jim]
...
The whole repository is only about 800 megs. There are over 8 gigs
free. Are the dump file or the file-based repo much larger in
size the the Berkeley database?
FYI, if you don't want to read the code ;-), the book says an FSFS
On 19 Dec 2005, at 22:38, Sebastien Douche wrote:
On 12/19/05, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That %$£@ BerkeleyDB backend was geborken again. svnadmin recover
fixed it.
Hi Jens!
Does Zope server use svn server ? I had many problems with it (with
the need to recover it each time
On 19 Dec 2005, at 13:59, Marinussen, M.J. (Ria) wrote:
Hi Jens,
I need the full error traceback to help.
The full traceback on:
Zope 2.7.2-0, python 2.3.5, win32
LDAPUserFolder 2.6
OpenLDAP 2.3.11
When I type the correct LDAP password I get this error and traceback
(otherwise I get an
On 19 Dec 2005, at 16:33, michael nt milne wrote:
Does RewriteEngine work on Apache for Windows 2.0.5 ?
I'm getting the following..
Syntax error on line 960 of C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2/
conf/httpd.con
f:
Invalid command 'RewriteEngine', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by
On 18 Dec 2005, at 06:46, Alan Milligan wrote:
I'm reconsidering the way we RPM package byte-code compiled python,
and
although I suspect optimised python is a bit of an anacronysm, I
thought
I'd check with the list ;)
If one was to start Zope with python -O, then it would look for (and
On 18 Dec 2005, at 09:40, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
make install does currently not work on 2.9 branch and trunk. I
am told that this is because zpkg cannot do it. I am also told
that the tarball would support make install, just not the checkout.
I never use tarballs, so I don't know for
redirecting this to the normal zope list where it makes more sense,
please continue there
On 15 Dec 2005, at 16:58, Chris Cole wrote:
Hey all,
I'm currently trying to setup a custom zope instance for our c.s.
department at school. Currently we run a totally linux infrastructure
with ldap
On 13 Dec 2005, at 13:11, Marinussen, M.J. (Ria) wrote:
I have LDAPUserFolder working in a sense that I can search for users
(and find the ldap entries) when I'm in the LDAPUserFolder - Users
tab.
So far so good. But when I limit access to a folder (in the
Security tab
on zope) to for
On 12 Dec 2005, at 11:04, Marinussen, M.J. (Ria) wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a zope product that enables me to use our Active
Directory LDAP server for verification of login credentials only.
I want users still stored in Zope, and access to directories should be
also something I can handle in
On 8 Dec 2005, at 22:57, Tim Peters wrote:
Can anyone advise me how to make this work under Zope 2.8.4?
I expect zeoup.py needs to be changed. I did a similar thing for
runzeo.py some time ago, and I bet the latter's
setup_default_logging() method could be mostly reused.
Just checked in a
On 9 Dec 2005, at 14:45, Florent Guillaume wrote:
So I propose another little change: have the error_log copy to
event.log be the default behaviour. Today the default is off.
+1
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Hi all,
In Zope 2.7 I'm using zeoup.py to check on a ZEO server. This script
can be run from anywhere as long as the PYTHONPATH is set correctly.
For Zope 2.8.4, the ZEO logging has been switched to use the logging
module. This leads to an error when running zeoup.py now:
CRITICAL -
On 8 Dec 2005, at 22:57, Tim Peters wrote:
To get unstuck quickly, try adding just this:
import logging
logging.basicConfig()
That always helps me in a pinch, but I never understood why (neither
why logging insists that you call _something_ before it will stop
annoying you, nor why
On 8 Dec 2005, at 18:46, Harry Forster wrote:
Jens I am sorry to say that I have compiled all software on this
machine. I
have done so so that I would not have confusion due to different
compilers.
I think that there is a problem with the manner in which I compile
Python or
compile
On 6 Dec 2005, at 01:05, Michael Dexter wrote:
The solution appears to be that python can use the TMPDIR variable
to specify where tmp should default to (reportedly it will try
various locations) but, I am not clear how I can add this to Zope's
rc script to declare it. I tried it as simply
On 3 Dec 2005, at 15:57, Paul Winkler wrote:
One thought that occurs to me is to replace httplib.HTTPConnection
with
a mock object of some sort that allows easy verification of its input.
So we assume that httplib works, as a proper unit test should I think.
How to do this? One idea is to
On 2 Dec 2005, at 14:16, Chris Withers wrote:
Please no. Don't put anything at INFO. A conflict error is either
something normal that should be at level BLATHER or below, or an
ERROR that a sysadmin wants to see logged as such.
Not so. If I'm getting 1,000 resolved conflict errors a day,
1. Do you want these ConflictErrors retried logs to be at level:
INFO
2. In addition, please specify if you feel those retried
ConflictErrors should have their full traceback logged?
no traceback
3. Finally, please tell us if the ConflictErrors that *can't* be
retried (and are
On 30 Nov 2005, at 08:20, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 11/30/05, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on a dedicated migration step. Might even be a chance for some
other cleanups.
So the process would be something like:
1. Make a FrankenDateTime that uses the pickles of the DateTime
On 29 Nov 2005, at 15:47, Tres Seaver wrote:
Yes, and for a perfect example of why (not related to DateTime,
just to
fix-in-place in general) prosecution calls zope.org.
Pros: Is it true that you harbor pickles from software which
pre-dates the original public release of the
On 29 Nov 2005, at 16:46, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 29. November 2005 17:36:51 +0100 Lennart Regebro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A question that then pops up is: Do we want to force people to do a
migration to upgrade between say Zope 2.9 and Zope 2.10, just to
replace all the DateTime
On 29 Nov 2005, at 11:12, Peter Bengtsson wrote:
Pardon my stupidity but is Chris Withers' Stepper the right thing
for me...?
yes
The call to sendAllUnsent() I would prefer if it was done
asyncronously in case it takes several seconds. I could accomplish
this by having a cron job calling
On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:35, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Hello,
Benji recently changed test.py in Z3 in order to avoid collision
name
with the standard python 'test' module.
I bumped into the same problem running
On 28 Nov 2005, at 09:53, Allen Huang wrote:
how do I do an auto-refresh to my browser with dtml? anyone have
any ideas?
Please don't confuse server-side code (like DTML) with browser-side
code (like Javascript and HTML). DTML cannot refresh your browser.
Use Javascript or HTML.
jens
On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I know there is a way to do just the same with mod_proxy, but
mod_proxy does
open new connection for every request while fastcgi uses the same
connection
for all requests. The is no problem on low load. But with growing
load, this
can
On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:05, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:43:44PM +, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I know there is a way to do just the same with mod_proxy, but
mod_proxy does
open new connection for every request while fastcgi
On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:25, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
It's a matter of resources, plain and simple. No one has stepped
forward to support it, so it atrophied. If you think it's a great
thing to keep, volunteer.
I would if I had the time and the knowlege. But I don't see a Problem
with the Code
On 28 Nov 2005, at 14:23, Andreas Jung wrote:
I agree. There should be one supported way to achive a goal. In the
past we had at least three methods to run Zope (fortunately we
kicked PCGI support
in the past). My suggestion is to deprecate FCGI officially in the
docs and through a
On 28 Nov 2005, at 14:52, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
Sure I object. Why should perfectly working code be removed. There is
no alternativ for heavy loaded sites which need integration of apache
and zope. mod_proxy is no alternativ because it raises the load even
further.
Sorry, I have to call
On 27 Nov 2005, at 15:49, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
The real difference now is that I used to be able to create an empty
directory from which to run configure and make, but now it only works
when you sit inside the full source tree... So in order to do my
usual
pristine source tree
On 26 Nov 2005, at 11:43, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Hi,
I've recently been seeing weird DateTime test failures on all Zope 2
branches since 2.7 (see below). Any idea what I'm doing wrong? My
system
is OSX 10.3 with a self-compiled Python 2.4.1 (through
darwinports). My
system
On 26 Nov 2005, at 15:07, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
However, I am noticing that on the current Zope 2.9 branch, trying to
build the software fails completely. The configure script works
fine,
but the make step does not seem to do anything at all.
Yes it does. It compiles the C
On 24 Nov 2005, at 10:54, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 24 November 2005 00:41, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
At least no one is expecting to make such big changes by
yourself. Being
stubborn and refusing to do further contributions, be they large
or
On 24 Nov 2005, at 00:09, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 18:49, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
People keep telling Zope2 developers that the inclusion of Zope3
doesn't mean you have to touch it, if you don't use it it is just
inert code that won't cause any change in your Zope2
On 23 Nov 2005, at 23:59, Fernando Martins wrote:
Hi,
As far as I can see and tried, the zope2.8 script only deals with
instances
which are created in the default instance directory,
/var/lib/zope2.8/instance/.
I would prefer to keep a specific instance of zope in a different
On 24 Nov 2005, at 00:00, Bill Bell wrote:
Yes or no.
OK, I know it's not that simple. I am working in an agency that
employs a third party to manage our network. The third party is
reluctant to install Zope and ZWiki for me, claiming that this will
open the system to potential
701 - 800 of 1121 matches
Mail list logo
