[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 2005-4-4 11:37 -0400:
...
As I think I'd mentionned, I get the Zope default home home page (Welcome to
Zope, etc ...), but with a big warning at the top telling me that I don't
have an administrative user setup and so on ... Which is obviously not true
:)
Fine. But, I
In our regular profiles, listFilteredActionsFor belongs to
the top consumers of CPU time.
Recently, I found the main culprit (in CMF 1.4):
It is the completely unnecessary:
if not action in catlist:
In our case, listFilteredActionsFor spends about 70 percent
of its complete time in
yuppie wrote at 2005-4-4 20:59 +0200:
...
2.) I prefer to see the correct import in each file and to use utils
just for the fallback.
But, then you get a nasty try: ... except: in hundred of
files rather than just a single one.
--
Dieter
___
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2005-4-22 17:17 +0200:
Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Yes we do! I really really really want to know if:
- I have a catalog entry that points to an object that no longer exists.
This can ONLY happen due to a bug somewhere and needs to be fixed
- I have
KLEIN Stéphane wrote at 2005-5-5 19:40 +0200:
...
typesTool.manage_addTypeInformation(
add_meta_type =
factory_type_information['meta_type'],
id = factory_type_information['id']
)
...
File
Chris Crownhart wrote at 2005-5-16 10:28 -0600:
...
I am building a CMF site that will have many organizations (could be up
to 200 or 300). Each organization will have it's own set of users, and
probably it's own set of roles, although most of the roles will be the
same across all
Chris Withers wrote at 2005-5-26 08:12 +0100:
...
My personal hate of it comes from seeing a thoroughly useless warning
coming from the old SearchIndex stuff for years and never being able to
figure out exactly what was causing the problem.
You asked for this a long time ago and I responded (a
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2005-5-27 13:30 +0200:
...
Let's not go into too much semantics here. Note that WARNING is an alias
of PROBLEM. zLOG defines these levels as:
PROBLEM=100 -- This isn't causing any immediate problems, but deserves
attention.
ERROR=200-- This
Raphael Ritz wrote at 2005-6-3 09:40 +0200:
Chris Withers wrote:
[..]
That said, I'm also aware that there are currently 4 of us talking about
this, 2 on each side. What does the rest of the community think?
Since you ask so explicitly ;-)
I agree with Florent: Your site's _USERES_ should
Maya Angelova wrote at 2005-6-17 10:26 +0200:
I have a the following problem by restarting a plone site under zope.
Could anybody give me a hint.
would be very grateful
sh plone2 restart
plone2: line 156: plone2 : command not found
plone2: line 158: plone2 : command not found
These are problems
Julien Anguenot wrote at 2005-6-20 11:19 +0200:
Christian Heimes wrote:
...
I'm proposing to change PortalFolder in the following way:
* Revert PortalFolder to be subclassed from Folder
* Create an OrederedPortalFolder as subclass from OrderedFolder
* Subclass all classes in CMF from
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2005-7-1 17:19 +0200:
In many places, CMFSetup exports and imports things like titles and
descriptions. For instance, for the workflow states and transitions.
These fields can often, outside the USA, contain non-ascii strings.
How do we export and reimport them ?
1.
David Chandek-Stark wrote at 2005-7-27 09:51 -0400:
I got no reply from plone-user on this issue -- I believe it's really a
CMF issue anyway. Add CMF 1.4.7 to the version info below.
Probably, because your question is not too clear...
...
In my site the undo form is always blank. In the ZMI,
David Chandek-Stark wrote at 2005-7-27 16:10 -0400:
Sorry, this is a Plone site. There is a Plone skin template undo_form
which calls container.portal_undo.listUndoableTransactionsFor(here) to
get the undoable transactions.
Not sure, whether Plone uses its own UndoTool.
The CMFCore UndoTool
Sam Brauer wrote at 2005-7-29 08:19 -0700:
I've recently encountered a similar problem, and I'm
not using Plone. I'm in the process of migrating some
CMF sites to Zope 2.7.7 and CMF 1.5.2, from Zope
2.7.2 and CMF-1.4.8.
With the newer software, I find that users who are
defined in the site's
Geoff Davis wrote at 2005-8-1 12:53 -0400:
...
* Are there any particular things in Plone that you think should be pushed
down into CMF?
PloneBatch seems quite useful.
I do not use Plone (due to its GPL) but I found the FactoryTool
useful. Because it is GPL, I studied its functionality and
then
yuppie wrote at 2005-9-5 14:06 +0200:
...
PortalTestCase is in the wrong layer. It makes assumptions about the way
CMF works. Changes to the CMF might break PortalTestCase and create a
dependency on a new Zope release. (We saw that problem already with the
_refreshSkinData changes in CMF 1.5)
yuppie wrote at 2005-9-21 18:10 +0200:
...
File Products/CMFDefault/Portal.py, line 26, in ?
from Products.CMFTopic import Topic
ImportError: cannot import name Topic
In a similar situation (with Archetypes) something like
import Products.CMFTopic.Topic; Topic =
Geoff Davis wrote at 2005-9-28 13:31 -0400:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:47:06 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
Thanks for the analysis, and the fix (sorry for the earlier, premature
reply).
No problem. P-J Grizel suggested offline that the problem might be due to
IE not parsing the time zone string at
Victor Safronovich wrote at 2005-10-11 14:04 +0600:
I have a question about DCWorkflow, WorkflowTool and Acqusition.
My object, during change state, move to another folder and should
change
acqusition wrapper.
workflow_tool = getToolByName( my_object, 'portal_workflow')
Tres Seaver wrote at 2005-10-11 08:58 -0400:
...
'call_with_ns' should be invoked only for objects with either a
'__render_with_namespace__' attribute (PythonScripts fit here) or those
with 'isDocTemp' true. Its only real purpose is to set up the namespace
before calling a DTMLMethod; I don't
Tres Seaver wrote at 2005-10-16 14:22 -0400:
...
Probably, because they can bind the DTML namespace...
I knew that they *could* bind it; it just don't understand why anyone
would *want* that feature, given the availability of the other,
non-ambiguous bindings.
I know that I used it
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2005-11-9 16:17 +0100:
...
To make sure that CMF 1.5.5 will play well with Five 1.2, I have to
make sure that no method manage_afterAdd redoes a recursion that one
of its base classes was doing, as we have to be prepared to have the
base class monkey-patched to
Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-11-30 10:33 -0500:
...
When you customize a FSPageTemplate, you get a plain ZopePageTemplate.
So you'll need to find a way to post-process the output of those
without requiring a change to core Zope, or this becomes a Zope
proposal. Unfortunately I haven't a clue how
Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2005-11-30 18:26 -0200:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:24:56PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
| Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-11-30 10:33 -0500:
| ...
| Instead, you change the makeZODBClone (or similar method)
| of FSPageTemplate and create a (new) CMFPageTemplate.
| (rather than
Alexander Limi wrote at 2005-12-3 14:27 -0800:
...
Except, the implementation did not end up including the query string -
which was the whole idea in the first place, to have ACTUAL_URL be what
is in the address bar right now, so things like anchors work (did you
know there is no proper way
Alexander Limi wrote at 2005-12-4 20:04 -0800:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 10:23:25 -0800, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What have anchors to do with the query string?
As I understand it, anchors (fragments in the URL) are a client
only concept: fragments are not transfered to the server
Doyon, Jean-Francois wrote at 2006-1-25 15:51 -0500:
... FSDTMLMethods ...
But, for some reason, now it seems bobobase_modification_time comes out
wrong :(
It's stuck at some date in October, even though the files are far more
recent.
Note that the methods (like bobobase_modification_time)
Encolpe Degoute wrote at 2006-3-7 20:33 +0100:
I found something funny yesterday that makes me spend some hours:
If you delete the state marked as initial state the variable initial_sate
always
contains its id.
Any workflow needs an initial state.
Thus, maybe, you should mark a new state as
George Lee wrote at 2006-3-8 10:17 -0500:
If I want a class to appear in the ZODB, is that just a matter of
subclassing SimpleItem?
Usually, classes do not appear in the ZODB -- just their instances.
SimpleItem is the base class of all (what I call) Zope site building
objects -- the term Zope
George Lee wrote at 2006-3-11 00:41 -0500:
...
What is the difference between Implicit and Acquirer? Between Explicit
and Acquirer?
An acquirer is an object with two components aq_self and aq_parent.
If asked for an attribute, any acquirer passes the request on
to aq_self and returns the result
George Lee wrote at 2006-3-12 00:05 -0500:
...
Other than understanding how Python wraps C classes -- is there anyway
of seeing where the classes are defined, understanding the methods +
method definitions, in a Python-looking way?
The DocFinder (or DocFinderTab) shows you the modules
classes
yuppie wrote at 2006-3-21 21:12 +0100:
There was a clear result: make the id checker policy configurable --
as Zope 3 does.
Well. That's right but doesn't help us much. We don't have a volunteer
for implementing that new feature. And we don't have a consensus what
the default policy should
Bartek Gorny wrote at 2006-3-29 11:50 +0200:
...
I have a script which creates a new instance of a certain portal_type
by a method constructContent, and then calls manage_setLocalRoles.
And I get an exception:
Module AccessControl.Role, line 362, in manage_setLocalRoles
AttributeError: __hash__
Yuppie already has considerable sped up listFilteredActionsFor
for CMF 1.5. However, even after his optimizations listFilteredActionsFor
can still consume lots of time.
I found simple situations where it had spend more then 10 percent of
total request time in testCondition.
I propose to make the
Bert Vanderbauwhede wrote at 2006-4-5 15:19 +0200:
...
I'm currently setting up a CMF site for testing purposes. While configuring the
CachingPolicyManager, I discovered that it didn't work for the Image and File
content types. However, it worked perfectly for the Document content
type. I only
yuppie wrote at 2006-4-26 18:25 +0200:
In createExprContext 'request' is currently set to getattr(object,
'REQUEST', None). 'object' might be None, making 'request' None as well.
Would anybody mind if I change that to getattr(portal, 'REQUEST', None)?
AFAICS portal is always available and can
yuppie wrote at 2006-6-4 18:12 +0200:
...
AFAIK registerDirectory and registerProfile work only inside of
Products.
At least in CMF 1.5, registerDirectory works outside Products, too.
Due to some bad design, it stops working when Products is somewhere
inside the path (even if not a complete
LESUEUR Frédéric wrote at 2006-6-22 15:08 +0200:
i have a question about the _setCacheHeaders methods inside this
file CMFCore/utils.py.
Why content is set to aq_parent and not the object itself ?
The model (underlying the caching policy manager) is that
templates (views) access content objects.
Frédéric LESUEUR wrote at 2006-6-23 10:03 +0200:
Le Jeudi 22 Juin 2006 20:00, vous avez écrit :
LESUEUR Frédéric wrote at 2006-6-22 15:08 +0200:
This, meanwhile (CMF 1.5 and up) should have been fixed.
ok thanks, this is what i'm thinking, it fail with object that are call
without view (like
yuppie wrote at 2006-7-14 11:30 +0200:
...
We have a Zope version where package resources (such as skins)
can come together with the package from a zip archive
(this is a function similar to the newer egg Python function).
We identify such resources via pypackage urls which have the form
Norbert Marrale wrote at 2006-8-4 17:53 -0400:
...
Which brings me to my original Q...
Is there a better way than the two-step approach I'm following:
emails = context.portal_membership.searchMembers('email','')
and then iterate over emails to find the matches
if
Miles Waller wrote at 2006-8-11 16:17 +0100:
...
I stepped through the code and somehow it thinks the user 'admin' is the
owner. I think this is being acquired from somewhere (not sure where).
I added the line _owner = None at the class level in
CMFCore.DTMLMethod (analagous to that in
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2006-9-13 09:15 +0200:
...
It is a long-standing bug that the CMFDefault File index_html (and
download, which is obsolete in newer CMF versions) simply defers to
index_html from OFS.File. That one doesn't know anything about Cache
Policy Managers, it only deals with
Miles Waller wrote at 2006-10-11 16:34 +0100:
...
output_page_2:
==
h2Here is the subtitle from template 2/h2
2. Add a rule to the cpm as follows:
id: template_test
predicate: view.endswith('_2')
etag: string:template_test
3. Make a request for yoursite/output_page_1
4. Note
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2006-10-11 12:03 -0400:
...
I'm not sure this can be called a bug. It is true (and perfectly
normal) that rendering a filesystem page template will always call
the CPM. You're rendering both here. Since output_page_2 is rendered
last as it's calles from output_page_1
Charlie Clark wrote at 2006-10-20 15:50 +0200:
...
There is a module for testing domains against a DNS
which is much more reliable. Regarding the rest I normally check with
the responsible MX server as negatives are usually reliable.
DNS queries can take quite a long time -- and we have seen
Crosspost: 'Reply-To' set to 'zope-cmf'.
We nearly escaped a catastrophy: a page with sensitive personal
information ended in a shared cache and was delivered to arbitrary
people. This happened despite the fact that the template generating
the page contained a response.setHeader('Cache-Control',
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2006-12-17 19:57 +0100:
...
I don't know if it is possible to have any sane policy about what to
do if the response already has caching headers. First of all, when
should this exception policy trigger? Which headers should tell the
CPM that someone else already
Wichert Akkerman wrote at 2006-12-18 08:38 +0100:
Previously Dieter Maurer wrote:
The description indicates in what direction the CPM should get fixed:
* If the response already provides cache control, the CPM should
not override it, as it is likely that the specific information
Miles Waller wrote at 2006-12-18 12:57 +:
...
At the moment, the CPM fires after rendering, so setting it's own
headers and overwriting any headers set in the template. If it fired
before rendering, then a template would be free to set whatever policy
it wanted.
Is there a special reason
Martin Aspeli wrote at 2007-1-6 22:06 +:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
The idea is to use a specialized persistent component registry, that
does the needed AQ-wrapping.
This will however only give us AQ-wrapped local utilities, whereas those
registered with the global component registry
Hanno Schlichting wrote at 2007-1-7 23:42 +0100:
Thus, the proposal exhibits an essential example that local
utilities should be returned acquisition wrapped (if the have an '__of__'
method).
Maybe a compromise would be to only return those utilities back
acquisition wrapped that where
Martin Aspeli wrote at 2007-1-7 23:40 +:
...
Why not do it a more Zope3 ish way:
class ICMFTool(Interface):
Marker for any CMF tool
and then in the subclass of the local component registry:
local_utility =
if ICMFTool.providedBy(local_utility):
local_utility =
Martin Aspeli wrote at 2007-1-9 20:48 +:
- It's an explicit declaration of support
As is the definition of __of__.
Well, not in a formal sense. I could have some non-Zope python object
that I wanted to register as a local utility (to override a global one,
say) that could have
yuppie wrote at 2007-1-23 18:55 +0100:
...
Yes, I object. This is a hack that resolves the issue just for some
special use cases. We need a solution that works with python packages
anywhere in the python path.
And packageresources
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2007-3-12 10:11 +0100:
There's some LoginManager compatibility code in
CMFCore.MembershipTool (see __getPUS and addMember) that I would like
to remove. LoginManager has gone the way of the Dodo several years
ago, I'd say at least 4 years ago. IMHO with this stuff
Charlie Clark wrote at 2007-3-27 13:28 +0200:
having made my own content type which is derived from Document with
three additional attributes, I've moved onto the exciting world of
editing content via webDAV. It seems some methods have to be extended/
overwritten for this to work so I have
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2007-3-28 08:16 +0200:
...
What makes you think you can make that assumption? This is Zope 2 all
over again, where things just have to be there. That won't help
making things more flexible.
Hiding exceptions (or avoiding them at all costs) might be seen as
Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
...
... deprecation of getToolByName ...
which is that there's no practical reason other than
aesthetics to deprecate getToolByName at this point.
A very good point: let's deprecate deprecations done just for
aethetical reasons :-)
This still
Martin Aspeli wrote at 2007-4-15 16:45 +0100:
...
Aesthetics were not the original reason for moving down this route, so
it's a little unfair to cast it in that light. The main drivers, as I
recall, were to encourage API usage that would allow us to move tools
out of content space eventually
Martin Aspeli wrote at 2007-4-25 19:58 +0100:
...
If the root of your CMF/Plone site contains content items, they need to
avoid collision with magical objects that are there primarily to make
our lives easier as programmers (since you can acquire them, and they
interact with Zope security
Darryl Dixon - Winterhouse Consulting wrote at 2007-5-28 22:30 +1200:
Which lends even more weight to my original query - why on earth
does reindexObject() update the modification time? I can see utterly no
reason why it should...
When the object is changed, the modification time should be
Joachim Schmitz wrote at 2007-6-16 13:35 +0200:
...
during our recent search for the cause of the many conflict errors, we
discovered that nearly all of them where caused during indexing the
portal_catalog, when the same values are indexed. This can happen easily
with date_indexes, since the
yuppie wrote at 2007-6-18 11:29 +0200:
...
Please let me know if you think this checkin causes too much trouble and
should be reverted.
We are using portals and their skins widely in scripts executed
outside of Zope. Especially, they do not use the ZPublisher
to traverse to the objects but use
Perry wrote at 2007-6-18 13:56 +0200:
...
I didn't find any application specific conflict resolution in the
fieldindex ? Are you saying, that once there is one document created
within a review_state, conflict errors for that review_state are very
unlikely, even under heavy load.
Yes. Due to
Doyon, Jean-Francois wrote at 2007-9-17 15:10 -0400:
...
But, its more generic purpose is essentially as a utility for the site, at
least conceptually. The only difference might be that it's NOT placeless.
But utilities for a site have a natural location: the site root.
A utility you place
Martijn Faassen wrote at 2007-9-25 17:22 +0200:
...
Should we then encourage everyone to hardcode version numbers in their
setup.py's dependencies list?
I think this goes against building applications from components --
as it drastically increases the probability of conflicts.
Components should
Charlie Clark wrote at 2007-9-27 21:33 +0200:
...
I'm used to restrictions in the ZODB: I usually put these kind of
things in a folder with I then restrict. Can you tell me more about
metadata?
I always look at the unit tests for the syntax:
Joachim Schmitz wrote at 2007-10-19 10:03 +0200:
If one iterates over the result of a portal_catalog search, for each
brain there are about 8 datetime objects loaded (one for each
dateindex), which quickly fills the memory.
how can I access only the brain id
You can get the brain id via
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2007-10-25 12:37 +0200:
...
I personally had one remaining issue, namely the fact that my main
browser (OmniWeb) could not display Launchpad at all due to a CSS bug
in OW itself.
I still have a similar issue: in my browser (Mozilla 1.5), launchpad pages
are
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-10-27 21:01 +0200:
...
I still have a similar issue: in my browser (Mozilla 1.5), launchpad pages
are unreadable: almost the complete page is covered by red signs of
the form --\.
You can solve this by upgrading to a more recent browser.
But, I probably will not
Marie Robichon wrote at 2008-2-6 08:42 +0100:
One of the administrators of our Plone site has changed services. Given
that our user authentication is via LDAP and that this person has write
access to some parts of our site I now want to change the ownership of
the pages he created in order to
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-2-28 07:13 +0100:
--On 27. Februar 2008 21:59:58 + Maurits van Rees
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
greenman, on 2008-02-27:
So, for the catalog.xml importer, why can't the trigger for reindexing
an index be a flag on the catalog index declaration itself? Is it
really
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-2-29 06:43 +0100:
...
When the export handler is able to extract all relevant configuration
parameters for an index, why should the import handler
not be able to check the configuration parameters in a profile
against an existing index and determine that it needs to
Alex Man wrote at 2008-4-8 13:37 -0700:
My apologies if this isn't the correct mailing list I should post
this question to. Please let me know if I should post on another list.
I'm using Shibboleth as the authentication system in Plone
Maybe, the Plone mailing list might be better.
and is
I tried to easy_install CMFCore from PyPI -- this failed.
Apparently, CMFCore is only registered on PyPI, not uploaded (this
is okay).
Moreover, the url registered as home page
(http://www.zope.org/Products/CMFCore;) apparently does not exist.
I do not think that this is a good sign...
--
easy_installing the current PyPI version of Products.GenericSetup (1.4.0)
reports:
File
/home/dieter/z211/z11python/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Products.GenericSetup-1.4.0-py2.4.egg/Products/GenericSetup/doc/SampleSite/profiles/default/siteroot/bar.py,
line 22
return printed
SyntaxError:
Ross Patterson wrote at 2008-6-30 10:34 -0700:
...
Creating a savepoint seems to do the trick:
from persistent import Persistent
import transaction
app.pob = Persistent()
app.pob._p_oid is None
True
s = transaction.savepoint()
app.pob._p_oid
'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00E\xfa'
Would that
yuppie wrote at 2008-9-18 11:13 +0200:
...
I personally prefer to move all type info Actions to the actions tool. I
can't see a need to specify separate 'view', 'edit' or 'metadata'
Actions for each content type. That just makes it necessary to maintain
a lot of redundant configuration data.
yuppie wrote at 2008-9-21 13:48 +0200:
...
Proposed CMFCore TypesTool changes
--
7.) listActions of the types tool returns add actions for *all* portal
types.
+1 - this change is already done, right?
Yes. Checked in yesterday.
But hopefully, the
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2008-10-8 14:57 +0200:
...
As far as the feature itself is concerned, I've never seen a situation
where this is useful or needed.
As so often -- we need it :-)
Our MembershipTool instance is (together with the portal)
in a read only mounted storage
while the Members
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2008-10-11 09:21 +0200:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 11, 2008, at 08:16 , Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2008-10-8 14:57 +0200:
...
As far as the feature itself is concerned, I've never seen a
situation
where this is useful
Wichert Akkerman wrote at 2008-11-17 08:21 +0100:
...
I'm sure CMF import/export steps are fine. The CMF tools are not, and
third party products use those in their steps. That is exactly the
problem we where seeing in Plone, and which is why I removed the utility
registration.
Zope is a Web
yuppie wrote at 2008-11-18 12:00 +0100:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Thus, why do local utilities registered by Five (i.e. these utilities are
for Zope2 use) do not provide access to the request in the normal
Zope2 way?
That's what we tried first. But it turned out that Zope 3's site manager
code
Martin Aspeli wrote at 2008-11-18 16:25 +:
...
This won't solve this particular problem, but it may be worth looking at
how other frameworks work. Pylons, for example, has the request
available as global variable - actually a thread-local. Zope could set
the request as a thread local in
Charlie Clark wrote at 2008-11-20 20:33 +0100:
...
Agreed. If third party tools have problems, then they should provide
the solutions.
The Plone people are much more open to integrate third party solutions
(a good thing in principle). But, they have only limited control
over third party
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-11-21 07:31 +0100:
... write performance ...
However the transaction size does not
seem to have any impact on the number of simulataneous writes.
Have you profiled an individual request to learn what the time is spent for?
If the time is dominated by client side
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-11-23 09:24 +0100:
...
Have you profiled an individual request to learn what the time is spent for?
If the time is dominated by client side activity, you need client side
skaling to increase the throughput significantly.
If, on the other hand, the time is heavily
Ross Patterson wrote at 2008-11-30 11:25 -0800:
...
I'm not really up on the historical considerations, but I'm definitely
in favor of context and definitely opposed to object. object is
too generic, the request is an object after all, everything is an
object. context reads more like what it
Charlie Clark wrote at 2008-12-14 12:32 +0100:
Am 13.12.2008 um 18:40 schrieb Charlie Clark:
Hi,
I'm struggling with the way formlib forms handle decoding from forms.
It looks like this gets set in BrowserView using an
IUserPreferredCharsets adapter. The default adapter seems to be in
Charlie Clark wrote at 2008-12-19 11:35 +0100:
...
Usually, the client will use the charset it has found in the
page containing the form. Thus, unless this charset has been
determined automatically from the Accept-Charset header,
it is merely accidental when the client preferences
Charlie Clark wrote at 2008-12-30 13:17 +0100:
Am 29.12.2008 um 19:20 schrieb Tres Seaver:
As Jens noted, this change is for FSProperties and FSSQLMethods only.
Yep, and these aren't generally objects that need to be changed
frequently in the FS.
But if possible, all FS* objects should
Charlie Clark wrote at 2009-1-18 15:49 +0100:
...
I would suggest that we work towards enforcing UTF-8 in where possible
but at the very least add the accept-charset attribute to forms and
use the portal's default_charset for this.
I'd very much appreciate your comments on this.
The
yuppie wrote at 2009-1-19 11:32 +0100:
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 18.01.2009 um 23:00 schrieb yuppie:
I agree that there shouldn't be implemented in a different way than
for Zope 3. And if we can solve the problems by fixing form encoding
I'm happy. Although I'd like to see UTF-8 always the
Charlie Clark wrote at 2009-1-18 22:30 +0100:
Am 18.01.2009 um 20:36 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
...
From the current HTML specification:
accept-charset = charset list [CI]
This attribute specifies the list of character encodings for input
data that is accepted by the server processing this form
yuppie wrote at 2009-1-19 22:54 +0100:
...
Products.Five.browser.decode.setPageEncoding sets the response content
type charset based on zope.publisher.http.HTTPCharsets. And
setPageEncoding is called by the update method of formlib forms in Zope
2. So in this case the response encoding has
Charlie Clark wrote at 2009-2-14 16:22 +0100:
...
I'm not that familiar with Buildout but I would have thought that any
direct import dependencies should be listed - and zope.location
doesn't seem to be (neither are zope.event or zope.site for that
matter). OTOH the condition = seems to be
Tres Seaver wrote at 2009-2-14 20:31 -0500:
...
For all its flaws, setuptools fixes a lot of what is horribly broken in
distutils: most of the flaws arise from the choice to stay
pseudo-compatible with distutils, and reuse it, rather than starting
from scratch.
But the dependancy handling is
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2009-2-16 13:48 +0100:
...
Does anyone else have a specific opinion for this case, disregarding
the five.localsitemanager discussion?
Dependancies should be as loose as possible.
If a component uses CMFDefault but only indirectly CMFCore,
it should specify
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
