On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:48 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
so, unless i'm completely wrong here, i'd say this is a pretty
serious security whole, no?
that should have been a "hole", actually... too late already, sorry! :)
andi
--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de
hi,
imho i've found a vulnerability in zope 2.10.4 or rather in the newer
version of five (1.5.5) used by it. in `Five/browser/
pagetemplatefile.py` in line 27 `createTrustedZopeEngine` is used the
instantiate the page template engine used by five templates, or at
least this is what i thi
--On 6. Juli 2007 16:48:39 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 Jul 2007, at 16:47 , Andreas Jung wrote:
ok, I'll make
- a1 around July 18th (tag against the current trunk)
- b1 around August 8th (new 2.11 branch)
Sounds reasonable?
Sure. The b1
--On 6. Juli 2007 16:38:44 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 Jul 2007, at 09:59 , Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 6. Juli 2007 01:48:11 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
now that Zope 3.4.0b1 has been tagge
--On 6. Juli 2007 01:48:11 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
now that Zope 3.4.0b1 has been tagged, I plan to release Zope 2.11.0b1
by mid-July. Objections?
Like Chris, I'd rather have one or two alphas first. Why not make an
alp
Hi,
now that Zope 3.4.0b1 has been tagged, I plan to release Zope 2.11.0b1
by mid-July. Objections?
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stutt
--On 5. Juli 2007 14:24:30 +0200 Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 05/07/2007 Stefan H. Holek wrote:
I may be missing something here, but the fact that you have to use POST
is fully intentional and not a "bug".
Yes, but it seems like this is not the case for the module
AccessContr
make the official release by the end of the week.
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535
Geschäftsführer/Gesel
On Jun 29, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
If I know Andreas he won't do ZODB releases... So, apart from
updating version.txt, CHANGES.txt, etc. and making a tag, I don't
think there would be much else to a ZODB release... *wink* :)
hmm, i'm not sure if
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 21 Jun 2007, at 23:47 , Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
ah, here it is: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76408&view=rev should fix
the zclasses problem, if i'm not totally mistaken.
Th
Do you have a target
date for 2.11?
Sometime after 3.4b1 is out (when ever that will be :-))
Andreas
pgpCQBl1vfJQB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross p
of some
Five exception work (Martijn Faasen).
Andreas
pgpDpVCUzFMep.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http
aving the OK from the related release masters. I could make
(internal) tags on my own but this should be done in general by the
responsible release manager (just for release safety) :-)
Andreas
pgpx9X1eIFW7p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:48 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 25. Juni 2007 12:56:08 -0400 Tres Seaver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shouldn't the Zope2 trunk be using ZODB 3.8 at this point? And
won't we
therefore get Jim's fix?
The 2.11 integration bran
On Jun 25, 2007, at 6:24 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
Back to the original subject...any objections to merge this 2.11
integration
branch back on the trunk *with* failing ZClasses tests.
hmm, maybe you lost me somewhere, but aren't we talking about your
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main
I am trying to merge the /Zope211-3.4-integration branch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sandboxes/Zope/Zope211-3.4-integration> svn info
Path: .
URL:
svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/repos/main/Zope/branches/Zope211-3.4-integration
Repository Root: svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/repos/main
Repository UUID: 62d5b8
l be disabled by default, so should not affect anything
unless you enable it in zope.conf. I've added good test coverage for
it, and it has been applied to trunk.
http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76767&view=rev
Any objections against applying it to the 2.10 branch?
No objections from my side.
A
--On 25. Juni 2007 12:56:08 -0400 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think some time early next week (depending on my schedule).
OK. I also promised to merge #2153, that gives me time to do that
(unless somebody pro
--On 25. Juni 2007 12:27:48 +0200 Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
That would be great, especially since we're on the verge of new
maintenance releases for 2
On Jun 25, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
That would be great, especially since we're on the verge of new
maintenance releases for 2.9 and 2.10.
when are they due? unfortunately i won't be able to do the
b
--On 25. Juni 2007 10:13:44 +0200 Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time
being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even
volunteer t
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time
being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even
volunteer to do it, if nobody else wants to... :)
That would be great, especially since we're on th
ilipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time
being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even
volunteer to do it, if nobody else wants to... :)
and btw, andreas' branch[1] produces no test failures for me (at
r76878) anyway, so imho we're good to go! :)
On Jun 21, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
and btw, andreas' branch[1] produces no test failures for me (at
r76878) anyway, so imho we're good to go! :)
and just fyi, the 2.10 branch[1] using zodb 3.8 also has no
failures... (i still need to merge in recent change
mp;view=rev should fix
the zclasses problem, if i'm not totally mistaken.
and btw, andreas' branch[1] produces no test failures for me (at
r76878) anyway, so imho we're good to go! :)
cheers,
andi
[1] svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/Zope211-3.4-
integration
--On 20. Juni 2007 12:29:29 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 20 Jun 2007, at 12:20 , Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 20. Juni 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4
If we merge this branch on the
trunk we will have a broken trunk. I have no problem with failing ZClasses
however it is against our policy to break branches/trunks :-)
Andreas
pgpPbj2LKM634.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-D
--On 6. Juni 2007 18:01:27 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the PIKTipi sprint this past weekend, Andi Zeidler, Andreas Jung and I
worked on integrating ZODB 3.8 and Zope 3.4 into the Zope 2 trunk. Zope
3.4 has actually "exploded" into many e
possible or from time to
time
as needed (as in this case).
Andreas
Forwarded Message
Date: 6. Juni 2007 15:38:21 -0300
From: Fabio Rizzo Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Upcoming Zope releases
Hi Andreas
--On 6. Juni 2007 14:18:18 +0200 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
just for your information: I plan to release Zope 2.9.8 and 2.10.4
around June 24th. Commit your bugs in time.
Right now we prefer bug fixes only :-)
Andreas
pgpx6yaJk84JN.pgp
Description: PGP sig
Hi,
just for your information: I plan to release Zope 2.9.8 and 2.10.4
around June 24th. Commit your bugs in time.
Cheers,
Andreas
pgpfGbvmslwVr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman
--On 28. Mai 2007 21:12:13 +0200 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On 28. Mai 2007 20:03:47 +0200 Joachim Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joachim Schmitz schrieb:
ConflictError: database conflict error (oid 0x7fd771, class
BTrees._IOBTree.IOBucket, serial this txn
--On 28. Mai 2007 20:03:47 +0200 Joachim Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joachim Schmitz schrieb:
ConflictError: database conflict error (oid 0x7fd771, class
BTrees._IOBTree.IOBucket, serial this txn started with 0x036deefe18489244
2007-05-28 17:34:05.691441, serial currently committed 0x03
--On 17. Mai 2007 13:37:35 +0200 Juan Javier Carrera Obrero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The traceback shows is:
-
Traceback (innermost last):
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 119, in publish
Module ZPublisher.mapply, line 88, in mapply
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 42, in call_ob
--On 17. Mai 2007 12:51:31 +0200 Juan Javier Carrera Obrero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi !
I am trying to install "ZGDChart" on Zope 2.10.4 (with RedHat Enterprise
5 and Python 2.4.4), but I have not gotten it.
I have tried to use: "gd library" (version gd-2.0.34), "gdchart" (version
gdch
--On 3. Mai 2007 20:43:40 +0200 Hanno Schlichting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi.
I have just recently been given zope.org SVN write access and made my
first bigger change - making zopectl work on Windows.
Although I don't care much about Windows, great job! Thank
--On 26. April 2007 14:10:49 +0200 Max M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung skrev:
He's trying to reinvent wheels? Reads a bit like GrokNG :-)
And reinventing the wheel is bad?
It depends on *who* is trying to reinvent wheels :-)
I just have some feeling about the qua
--On 25. April 2007 16:35:54 -0400 Kapil Thangavelu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As someone who used ZClasses intensively, I believe "yes".
As so often, I disagree and must second Philipp.
i'd agree with andreas but for one thing, restarting the app server for
minor co
why Grok is attractive for
writing Z3 apps and attracting more people to Z3.
Is this so much harder than ZClasses? I believe no
As someone who used ZClasses intensively, I believe "yes".
As so often, I disagree and must second Philipp.
Andreas
pgpIcRVnjzMdj.pgp
Description: PGP signat
--On 25. April 2007 07:48:04 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 4/24/07, Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I actually think TTW schema generation has some validity (so content
types can be easily generated by users).
Totally. What Christopher needs can be done with
--On 23. April 2007 03:57:25 -0700 Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Plone development with Archetypes is not painful. Hundreds of
developers do it, so it can't be that bad.
Urm, that's not true. Archetypes is the single most painful co
ecause (a) no-one else seems to care and (b)
not many other people seem to even know how this should work.
Amen. Sorry Christopher but the quality of this proposal is more than poor.
Andreas
pgpJF8ZPed2NO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev
ghly appreciated. But please: come up with
*something*...don't except that the solution for your particular problems
falls from the sky (or comes from one of the Zope 2 core developers)...it's
time for personal efforts.
Andreas
pgpcO7pKL6f1t
ses but about that you're
talking (and complaining) about ZClasses and their state since years
without contributing anything to ZClasses. This makes you just implausible
to me.
Andreas
pgpteT2dBcNJE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillis
--On 18. April 2007 12:32:24 -0700 Christopher Lozinski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a much richer deeper long-term vision of where this is going, but
the longest road begins with a single step.
I think you should stop dreaming and face the reality. There is almost
nobody interested o
of
times. Rewrite your apps from scratch using decent technologies - either on
top of Zope2/CMF or Zope 3.
Andreas
pgpMOXN95Y5bY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-d
New tar-balls are now available for download. I removed the warning
messages from the download pages and the zope.org frontpage.
Thanks to Martijn and Michael for jumping in!
Andreas
--On 26. März 2007 16:53:06 +0200 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I decided to retractthe
--On 26. März 2007 20:54:55 +0200 Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/26/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The penalty for this bug: two bottles of wine.
You know where to send the bill. ;)
The workaround is to add REQUEST as optional parameter to
ma
_Panel and must've
missed the REQUEST parameter on manage_restart, which only comes into
effect when running the zope process with zopectl start.
The penalty for this bug: two bottles of wine.
The workaround is to add REQUEST as optional parameter to manage_restart()?
A
own immediately. Unfortunately I could not find the reason so far.
Any help will be appreciated.
Andreas
pgpShX8I0j765.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cro
--On 10. März 2007 08:50:42 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I plan to release in about two weeks:
- Zope 2.10.3
- Zope 2.9.7
- Zope 2.8.9
Last orders please..I'll start with the release this Sunday
afternoon...so all pending fixes should be checked
--On 21. März 2007 14:11:32 +0100 Nicolas Delaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi all,
I can reach the author of ZopeLDAP Product (
http://www.zope.org/Members/jshell/ZopeLDAP).
I'll like to know, which licence is used by ZopeLDAP Product, and how can
we contribute to this Product ?
This pro
--On 17. März 2007 17:56:42 +0100 Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
currently after a make clean; make inplace; make instance -d
$INSTANCE_HOME; cd $INSTANCE_HOME, zopectl fg fails with:
works for me.
Andreas
pgpS1OkFiCzWk.pgp
Description: PGP sig
7;t
work on this issue and this issue won't hold up the upcoming releases
scheduled for in about one week.
Andreas
pgp5tbaM4hHy3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
Please stay on the list!
Bugs that are not reported through the bugtracker don't
exist by definition :-)
So the answer is: no.
-aj
Forwarded Message
Date: 12. März 2007 12:16:15 +0100
From: "M. Krainer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andreas Jung <[E
Hi,
I plan to release in about two weeks:
- Zope 2.10.3
- Zope 2.9.7
- Zope 2.8.9
The releases should fix some minor issues. If you have some
fixes pending, please commit them during the next two week.
Andreas
pgpUT9QcnEJN0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--On 5. März 2007 22:20:50 -0500 JZopeDev Kioza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem since upgrading to Zope210x that I hope, concerns
"Development folks".
I use a call to "custom-internal" pagetemplates in one of my products
(actually they are plugins).
With Zope 2.9.6, in m
be opposed against such a speedup patch as long as it does
not raise other problems. However I don't know App.* enough to be evaluate
the patch.
Andreas
pgp4nEbEdRjxB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http
--On 1. März 2007 09:52:53 + Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I'll bet one is backed by a hashtable and the other is backed by an r/b
tree, meaning the Set is O(1) lookups, possibly a bit less space
efficient and non-ordered,
Well, Set's are definitely o
--On 9. Februar 2007 00:47:09 -0800 Ridzwan Aminuddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi guys...
I wrote an external python script which would grab some HTML and so some
text and file preprocessing.
The script then is supposed to run come command line methods... using
os.system() .. however whe
--On 5. Februar 2007 01:10:37 -0800 Rohit Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
hi aj,
i am trying to access mywebsite.com/manage, but i dont remenber admin
password of root manage section.
Is there any way to recover it.
rohit
Please read the replies you got carefully.
-a
pgpONxyTreIcu.pg
loying it to
sites. Someone of you might be interested to convince Dieter being more
flexible and less meticulous.
$ python -c "import this" | grep purity
+1 on this but this applies always to both sides :-)
Andreas
pgpkB4VwI256b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
--On 4. Februar 2007 18:44:38 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On 4. Februar 2007 18:39:22 +0100 Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Feb 2007, at 18:27, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Note that we h
responsibilities
from ZC to the Zope Foundation. We should discuss that on the foundation
list.
Andreas
pgp4UfRwsENOU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cr
--On 4. Februar 2007 18:12:52 +0100 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-2-3 08:47 +0100:
...
* my code uses 2 blank indentation rather than the usual 4 blank
(to make it more readable and easier to maintain for me)
The source would have
ote already
yesterday) and let's stop the discussion at this point :-)
Andreas
pgp1AJf7TYAgb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! *
--On 2. Februar 2007 10:01:58 -0800 Rohit Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
hi all,
i have my website in zope 2.6.4 and i have forgotton UserId(admin) and
Password of root direcrorty of zope.
please tell me Is there any way to recover admin password ? or is there
any default UID & password p
at Python
if some of you guys show up in Dallas later this month.
Andreas
pgpNnGLrfvXWU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Relat
conditions?
No problem for importing the current state of your package on svn.zope.org.
But we need a volunteer to integrate the packages for Zope 2.11. I think
your code contains some ZCatalog monkeypatches...the related code has to be
integrated properly.
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG -
--On 2. Februar 2007 15:09:53 +0100 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
0, for keeping zLOG for the time being...
-1, for undeprecating it. Using Python's logging module should remain
the only
--On 1. Februar 2007 12:31:12 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 1. Februar 2007 11:01:56 -0500 Chris McDonough
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How many people would get indignant if I checked in a fix that
ilable as egg or as downloadable product.
Andreas
pgpvycy3lozNe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
are highly welcome.
You can find further information about the Zope conference here:
http://www.zope.de/8-dzug-tagung
Regards,
Andreas Jung
Assistant Chairman DZUG e.V.
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - P
Hi,
although "make test" reports no errors for the trunk/2.10 branch I get the
following errors when running "zopectl test". Any ideas?
Andreas
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/develop/sandboxes/Zope/Zope2/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCa
ting option string(s): --config-file
/opt/python-2.4.4/lib/python2.4/optparse.py(913)_check_conflict()
-> option)
(Pdb)
Any ideas?
Andreas
pgpmwu4bQe9IK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zo
Running the ZPublisher tests (on the trunk) alone results in the following
error. However the tests works when running all unittests. Bug or feature?
Andreas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sandboxes/Zope/Zope> bin/zopectl test -s ZPublisher
Running tests via: /opt/python-2.4.3/bin/pyt
I added/extended some tests that will fail because of errors in Zope.
One failure is related to the FTP acquisition bug (#2261). Two other
failures are related to rendering ZPTs with content_type text/xml.
-aj
pgpTWoZ7xXcRZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
eparate
releases.
Thoughts?
+ sys.maxint
For the records:
After some more off-list discussion with Philipp I decided to move only
the trunk. This is done now.
The 1.5 branch still exists and Philipp tagged Five 1.5.2 for Zope 2.10.2.
Thank you both!
Andreas
pgpfIhWVYGE40.pgp
Descriptio
and
1.6 are maintained as part of Zope 2. In fact there will be no Five 1.5.2
or 1.6 because there will no longer be any separate releases.
I don't have a problem with this approach. In fact the change would make
clear which version belongs to what.
Andreas
pgptkCcNo9gqY.pgp
Descriptio
e way. However the default behavior
won't change.
Andreas
pgpffVOdh1drg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related list
Zope as
application-server.
There are several SOAP related products available on zope.org. Does anyone
know about their functionality, pros & cons? I know that there is also some
SOAP support available for Plone/Archetypes (I think written by Benjamin
Saller).
Thoughts?
And
Hi,
I added Products/PageTemplates/configure.zcml to register an utility.
That works fine when running Zope however "zopectl test" won't work
properly anymore because the utility registration does not seem to happen
when
running the tests. Bug or feature?
Andreas
pg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On 29. Dezember 2006 11:25:28 +0100 "Stefan H. Holek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> The changes are not backward compatible, apparently.
> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2006-December/003656
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On 28. Dezember 2006 20:43:34 +0100 Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Andreas Jung schrieb:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> as mentioned in an earlier
that most people don't test betas :-))
Thoughts? Objections?
Andreas
- --
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting
-
compatibility are much, much more important for the end-user
than satisfying our replace-all-with-something-better drive :-)
Don't get me wrong but we've done some minor mistakes with replacing stuff
in the past and because of that I became a bit conservative about changing
things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On 17. Dezember 2006 18:40:03 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> That is dangerous, because a page template may be called without being
>> the "main" driver for a request; the response encoding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On 17. Dezember 2006 12:26:26 -0500 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> A ZPT has now something as an output_encoding. When you create a ZPT
>> through the ZMI you'll be asked about the encoding (which is utf8 by
>> default). The pt_rende
ments.
Any objections merging the changes on the head after further polishing and
writing some more test?
Andreas
- --
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
E-Publishing, Python, Zope &
servative approach as blobs are a new feature and we don't
> want to destroy existing databases.
>
+1
Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFhS0tCJIWIbr9KYwRAufOAJ9p+Tamy3IINBkgj/TjosnOPEN7KQ
e of Zope 2.9 create the file in the proper
location however in Zope 2.10 the makefile creates lib/python/version.txt.
Is there a particular reason for this? I currently have now clue what is
bug and what is intended behavior. Any insights? *sigh* :-)
Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
--On 17. November 2006 16:05:02 + Chris Withers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I am planning to release 2.10.1 and 2.9.6 early next week (likely on
TUE).
I'll hopefully be checking in today, but please can you wait until I've
checked in a fix for #
I am planning to release 2.10.1 and 2.9.6 early next week (likely on TUE).
Cheers,
Andrfeas
pgpk6KYrMGVxe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or H
--On 31. Oktober 2006 02:56:39 +0100 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
What are our benefits from a Z2 Eggification. Eggification is basically
about packaging and distribution of components with little dependencies
in order to re-use them in
others. Or are we talking about using Zope 3 eggs
within Zope 2 as part of the Zope 2 distribution process?
Andreas
pgpFt5mPpL6tP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
t that...
Andreas
pgp8Cdtm8XryA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-an
related 3.3 tag.
Andreas
pgpYJI9YlhzE5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listin
--On 19. Oktober 2006 15:03:43 -0300 Sidnei da Silva
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:43:22PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
| Most of the active Zope developers do *not* run Zope on Windows, which
| is why there are no Windows binaries for recent Zope versions. We do
| have
--On 9. Oktober 2006 19:11:55 +0200 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I would not recommend anyone to over-use multiple inheritance as it's
been done in Zope 2.
I am a strong favorite of (multiple) inheritance and use it excessively.
I have the feeling that it makes me very producti
501 - 600 of 1336 matches
Mail list logo
