Greetings all,
With apologies for cross-posting, Martin suggested that I go ahead and email
the plone core developers list about changes to zopeskel, as many interested
parties would be there and not on the official zopeskel list.
Following some trials and tribulations at the Plone Conference
One of the outcomes of the ZopeSkel BBQ sprint was a set of proposals regarding
the future of the zopeskel project. Many of these proposals are sweeping
enough in their scope that those of us in attendance at the sprint felt that
the input of the community would be required before we moved forw
On Jan 16, 2010, at 5:31 AM, Martin Stadler wrote:
> I'd like to take the opportunity, again, to point out that there are
> unconfirmed issues here:http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/ which
> should be taken care of in a way.
>
> Martin
Martin,
Thanks for pointing that out. I hadn't
zopeskel/issues/24 . Any idea
> when ZopeSkel will be splitted, I'd like to finish before that :)
> -Roel
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Cristopher Ewing
> wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2010, at 5:31 AM, Martin Stadler wrote:
>
> > I'd like to take t
Thanks for your help in completing this work, Roel! It is much appreciated.
c
On Jan 18, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Roel Bruggink wrote:
> Cristopher
>
> It will be finished this week, I don't have more time sadly.
>
> -Roel
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Crist
Hello everyone!
after a day or three of wrangling, I've managed to get ZopeSkel 2.15 released
on pypi. You can now `easy_install -U zopeskel` and get the latest goodies
from the BBQ sprint plus more!
To read all about it, go here:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=display&name=ZopeSkel
Glad you two are on this. Let me know how it turns out.
c
On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Josh Johnson wrote:
> I just confirmed that the problem did *not* happen in a fresh virtualenv. Not
> sure what's up with the buildout environment. This is handy for development
> buildouts...
>
> I also c
I've been working, on and off, with fRiSi on a resolution to this issue:
http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/31
I'm feeling like I need some backup from someone with a better understanding of
i18n than I currently possess. Is there anyone on list who'd like to look at
that issue and fRiS
Hi all,
Here's another issue that has me stumped for the time being:
http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/35
It appears that the part of paster that is trying to auto-commit the newly
created skeleton to an svn repository is assuming that there will be an
egg-info directory in the code te
Chris,
Thanks for the input. I appreciate your guidance as I get used to managing a
process like zopeskel.
On Mar 15, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Chris Calloway wrote:
> The ticket can simply document what the upstream problem is. By leaving it
> open with that documentation, it can provide a pointer t
On Mar 16, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Chris Rossi wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Chris Calloway wrote:
> On 3/16/2010 10:37 AM, Chris Rossi wrote:
> If I may play devil's advocate here, isn't the very idea that zopeskel
> would do your svn checkin for you a bit overwrought? Is it so ha
Working on it. Should be out early next week.
c
On Mar 18, 2010, at 12:02 PM, René Fleschenberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could we get a new PyPi release that includes the fix from r111693? That
> problem keeps hitting people, and even though it is an easy one to work
> around, it can be confusing to
Josh,
I think we will find going forward that this is absolutely the case. I'm just
not really willing to make that jump yet. If there are those out there who
feel confident enough to start working on a branch of zopeskel without the
paster dependency, I'd certainly welcome it, but I'm not co
With apologies for cross-posting:
Announcing the release of ZopeSkel 2.16, uploaded this afternoon to pypi and
plone.org
In this release:
* improved test coverage
* fixes for a number of issues from the zopeskel tracker:
* http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues
René,
Have you contacted the folks behind the zc.buildout project with this?
bootstrap.py is their file. We only keep a copy of a good version of the file
local to ZopeSkel and do not control that project. I think this change might
better be addressed by them.
c
On Mar 25, 2010, at 7:14 P
Hi all,
Mikko Ohtamaa (moo_) has just posted a nice, clean solution to the
often-encountered problem of using a package developed in ZopeSkel in a
buildout. The blog post is here:
http://blog.mfabrik.com/2010/04/13/using-paster-create-command-with-buildout-and-avoiding-the-infamous-dependency-
On Apr 13, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
>
> On 2010-04-13, at 1702, Cristopher Ewing wrote:
>
>> Would there be any objections to implementing his fix by adding pastescript
>> and zopeskel to the eggs list for all the standard plone buildout templates
>>
like that) error message.
>> An if we try with less arguments, the values aren't assigned to the proper
>> vars.
>>
>> Do you have any other suggestion?
>>
>> Cheers and thanks for your prompt answer.
>>
>> Marcos
>>
>> On
On Jun 1, 2010, at 1:33 AM, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The default metadata.xml that ZopeSkel has in various templates looks
> like this:
>
>
>
> 1
>
>
> If nobody objects, I intend to change the version from 1 to 1000. The
> reason is that GenericSetup can get confused when compar
Hi all,
Marcos Romero and Juan Pablo Gimenez have contributed a nice branch to help us
get rid of the anachronistic use of AnnotationStorage and ATFieldProperties
currently used in the archetype template's atschema local command. I have some
questions about the work, and about the issues surro
er way.
c
> Juan Pablo: any thoughts about this?
>
> Regards
>
> Marcos F. Romero
> Responsable de Desarrollo
> Inter-Cultura
>
> marcos.rom...@inter-cultura.com
> www.inter-cultura.com
> +54 11 4542-8299
>
>
> On 07/06/2010 15:34, Cristopher Ewing wrote:
ZopeSkel version 2.17 is now available on pypi and plone.org. Please update
your local versions to get access to the latest goodness.
In this release we have:
* added a Browser Layer subcommand for plone and archetypes template
* improved version numbering for metadata.xml so you can incr
Hi all, apologies because this one's gonna be a bit long. . .
an issue that was reported today to the zopeskel tracker
(http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/46) got me to thinking about how we
can implement a more flexible, reliable and configurable way of building
directory and file struc
On Jun 23, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Winn King wrote:
> Hi,
> Created a new product using archetypes template and contenttype and
> atschema localcommands. Added to buildout.cfg and ran buildout
> successfully. Upon restarting, getting this error:
>
...
>
>ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File "/home/wi
Desarrollo
>> Inter-Cultura
>>
>> marcos.rom...@inter-cultura.com
>> www.inter-cultura.com
>> +54 11 4542-8299
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Winn King wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:50:30 -0700, Cristopher Ewing wr
Desarrollo
> Inter-Cultura
>
> marcos.rom...@inter-cultura.com
> www.inter-cultura.com
> +54 11 4542-8299
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Cristopher Ewing
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 23, 2010, at 5:33 PM, Marcos Romero wrote:
>>
>>>
Greetings, all.
Today we release ZopeSkel 2.18, a bugfix release to the venerable code
generation tool for Zope and Plone.
In this release:
• fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/48, bin/zopeskel --version
now reports current version number
• fix for http://plone.org/products/zope
On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:54 PM, David Glick wrote:
> On 9/30/10 11:50 AM, Cristopher Ewing wrote:
>> Greetings, all.
>>
>> Today we release ZopeSkel 2.18, a bugfix release to the venerable code
>> generation tool for Zope and Plone.
>>
>> In this rel
On Sep 30, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Elizabeth Leddy wrote:
>
> On 9/30/10 11:50 AM, Cristopher Ewing wrote:
> > Greetings, all.
> >
> > Today we release ZopeSkel 2.18, a bugfix release to the venerable code
> > generation tool for Zope and Plone.
> >
> &g
On Sep 30, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Nate Aune wrote:
> Would also like to see the plone hosting stuff get integrated at some point -
> its just sitting in a branch right now. Happy to help when needed.
>
> yes, i have a huge guilt yoke hanging over my head for not getting these
> things merged back i
On Oct 1, 2010, at 12:00 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>
>
> 2010/10/1 Cristopher Ewing
>
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Elizabeth Leddy wrote:
>
>>
>> On 9/30/10 11:50 AM, Cristopher Ewing wrote:
>> > Greetings, all.
>> >
>> > Today we
Greetings all,
I have taken the first steps towards a refactoring of ZopeSkel from a
monolithic package into a federated series of namespace packages. For
information on the reasoning behind this move, and the goals of the move,
please refer to the SPLITTING_PROPOSAL document in the trunk of Z
> www.inter-cultura.com
> +54 11 4542-8299
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Clayton Parker wrote:
>> On Oct 4, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Cristopher Ewing wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings all,
>>>
>>> I have taken the first steps towards a refactoring of Z
zopeskel-boun...@lists.plone.org
> [mailto:zopeskel-boun...@lists.plone.org] On Behalf Of Cristopher Ewing
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 5:36 PM
> To: Zopeskel Users and Developers
> Subject: Re: [Zopeskel] ZopeSkel v3 refactoring begins
>
>
> On Oct 9, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Marc
Templer works for me, but I'm finding myself agreeing with Roel in not wanting
to be associated with the religious thing.
How 'bout 'maker'? There's a nifty Stanislaw Lem book with a series of short
stories about two robots named Trurl and Klapaucius who are 'makers' (sort of
gods of the robot
On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
>
> On 2010-10-19, at 0002, David Convent wrote:
>
>> Templer is a cool name and, trust me, it's easy to deconnect a name from its
>> primary religious context.
>
> In that case, may I suggest BabyJesusTemplates?
>
> Matt
Ouch! Diet Coke
Hi all,
We've been getting a fair number of complaints that there are no plone4
specific templates in zopeskel (http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/53,
http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/52). I've been working on the
next-generation breakup of zopeskel and am hoping that someone (
On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Clayton Parker wrote:
>> IIRC, the latest versions of plone3_buildout will take any (I guess)
>> version of Plone when it asks. I've made Plone 4 buildouts with it a
>> bunch of times over the past year.
>
> I've done something similar for our internal buildout se
On Nov 15, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Clayton Parker wrote:
>>
>> At any rate, does anyone have the time to help add new or alter existing
>> buildout and theme templates to support plone4 in a more explicit way?
>
>
> Do you want to move forward with making the installer based and zopeskel
> based
Emanuel,
Thanks for your contributions. This would seem like a logical place to post,
and I'll alert the folks fully responsible for zopeskel.dexterity. I'm sure
they'll be happy to roll in the fixes once they've looked them over and release
a new version.
As for plans to continue developmen
w should be
> registered for; basically what goes in the grok.context() directive. I can't
> think of a better way to do this than asking for the full dotted name for
> the schema class.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Emanuel
>
>
> Cristopher Ewing wrote:
&
Hi all,
after a longer-than-expected period of development, I am happy to announce the
first beta release of templer.core 1.0b1.
This new package is the first step in the breakup of the zopskel package into a
number of smaller and more easily managed packages. The core package contains
basic
On Dec 1, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Alex Clark wrote:
>
> I'm afraid I'm already confused :-). Is templer.core the zopeskel
> package renamed?
>
I wish it were a bit less confusing, but let me try to explain.
zopeskel as it currently exists will eventually be replaced by an empty egg
which simply
I'm seeing a failure in the tests for the zopeskel recipe template that started
popping up when I tried testing my new templer.core package outside my regular
build environment.
It turns out that pinning zc.buildout to version 1.4.3 solves the problem, so
I'm pretty certain that whatever is cau
On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Chris Rossi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Cristopher Ewing
> wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure that pinning all our templates to a version of zc.buildout
> that is now a year old isn't such a hot idea, but it did get me back to
&g
I am pleased to announce the release of templer.buildout 1.0a1 and
templer.core1.0b2
templer.core 1.0b2
* fixes documentation errors in 1.0b1
* fixes bug in templates with no license
* moves the zc.buildout recipe template to the new templer.buildout package
templer.buildout 1.0a1
*
Fantastic, Godefroid!
Thanks very much for this. So long as the current tests for zopeskel pass,
please go ahead and merge. I'm planning on a new release toward the middle of
next week, so it'd be really nice to get this in.
Thanks again,
Cris
On Dec 16, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Godefroid Chapell
Apologies for cross-posting
I am pleased to announce that ZopeSkel 2.19 has been released on pypi and
plone.org.
In this release:
* improvements to the README documentation for the zopeskel package
itself.
* Shiny new plone4_buildout template
Thanks to
thet
mi
48 matches
Mail list logo
