On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 02:18:38 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Right now, image library is more or less ready for next
feedback.
Windowing is almost there, really just needs a bit of testing
and its done.
So in other words, the hold up, is me.
Where can I find the code to be tested?
On 07/02/16 4:23 AM, Piotrek wrote:
On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 02:18:38 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Right now, image library is more or less ready for next feedback.
Windowing is almost there, really just needs a bit of testing and its
done.
So in other words, the hold up, is me.
Where
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 11:22:50 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
How would you select the package version you want to use.
Obviously it would be fine for small scripts to pick the latest
version, but no so much for non-trivial projects.
Somewhat related: I would love to be able to
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 23:35:21 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
...
Actually now that I think about it, you can do with out the
pragma and just define something like this...
mixin template DubDependency(string dependency, string vers)
{
// Does nothing but print a dependency
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 11:25:08 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
In theory it's completely irrelevant as to whether is something
is in the standard library or can just be imported via dub or a
git clone, but in practice that's not the case.
In support of this statement in particular I'd
On Thu, 04 Feb 2016 01:23:14 +, Tofu Ninja wrote:
> Actually, nvm, wouldn't actually work because as soon as you add an
> import derelict.opengl3.gl3; it would error out because it cant find the
> file and it wouldn't print the dependencies.
You could do it with libdparse, since it doesn't
On Thursday, 4 February 2016 at 00:50:43 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 23:35:21 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
...
Actually now that I think about it, you can do with out the
pragma and just define something like this...
mixin template DubDependency(string dependency,
PvDda> I hope D GUI will be usable some day for me and other people not
PvDda> wanting to fight with tools (and external libraries).
Oh yeah! I find this library the most adequate (and the most
accessible, btw). But unfortunately it seems abandoned :(.
Andre
On 1/29/16 11:07 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I'd love it if you could do `import thirdparty.independent;` and it
magically works too - without even need for a configuration file or an
install command. And the docs are right there and tutorials are written
however the author feels like writing them.
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:07:48 +, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> I'd love it if you could do `import thirdparty.independent;` and it
> magically works too - without even need for a configuration file or an
> install command. And the docs are right there and tutorials are written
> however the author
On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 16:07:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
When you do `import std.string;` you expect it to just work,
and you find std.string's docs easily from dmd.
I'd love it if you could do `import thirdparty.independent;`
and it magically works too - without even need for a
On Monday, 1 February 2016 at 11:42:54 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
The process will be complete when you've backported the
entirety of 2.068.
From what I recall, 2.068 was fairly painless to merge anyway
compared to other releases.
— David
On 1/02/2016 8:46 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I know, I've been hitting bug after bug in 2.067, and the answer has always
been to backport from 2.068. I already have backported druntime's object.d
from 2.068 because 2.067's object module has drifted so far out of sync
On 29 January 2016 at 22:29, Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 20:30:35 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> How much of it actually depends on the compiler though? I'd be a little
>> surprised if we couldn't backport at
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 12:40:56 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I think that Sonke received too much "negative motivation" for
his contributions recently, if I had been in his shoes I'd
probably found working on vibe.d more fun. IRRC Ruppe also have
voiced that he want to work on
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
Just out of curiosity, is getting the different compilers in sync
still a priority? Right now we have dmd at 2.070, ldc at 2.068.
and gdc at 2.066.
On 29 Jan 2016 6:55 pm, "Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>> Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
>
>
> Just out of curiosity, is getting
On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 16:07:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
In my perfect world, quality third party apps - as determined
just by usage stats or something - would be automatically
downloadable and their documentation searchable as if it was
standard.
I've noticed that curated lists of
On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 23:41:47 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Yep, a curated list like those awesome-lists found on github
would be a start.
I've got one before there were many awesome-lists:
https://github.com/zhaopuming/awesome-d
On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 20:30:35 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
How much of it actually depends on the compiler though? I'd be
a little surprised if we couldn't backport at least 80% of
phobos to 2.067/2.068 with zero changes.
I have no idea, I think you are probably right. But having a
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
A couple comments:
a) No mention of targeting increased organizational participation
(academic, corporate, etc). Not trying to suggest it should or
On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 18:13:21 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 29 Jan 2016 6:55 pm, "Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d-announce"
< digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Hot off the press!
On 29 January 2016 at 21:14, Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 18:13:21 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> On 29 Jan 2016 6:55 pm, "Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
>> digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 16:12:44 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
the standard library or not. As discussed elsewhere, there are
clearly benefits to putting some things in phobos (if only for
providing a framework for others), and there are costs as it
gets too large.
That's the maintenance costs,
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 11:25:08 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I do like the building-block idea you suggest, but one must
think about the deeper reasons for why things are owned by
which people. (I have found the Coase theorem and work on
industrial organisation to be quite stimulating
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 11:25:08 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
As you yourself have mentioned, the size of the D community as
it stands today presents some impediment to the possible
maintenance and stability of alternative libraries. If
something is in Phobos you know that you can depend
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 21:00:41 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
A good criteria is whether some area has an established and
hard to debate solution, then it can go into the standard
library. But if there are many different ways around the same
topic you should leave the decision to the
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 02:36:55 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 00:28:26 UTC, Twenty Two wrote:
Parkinson's Law: work expands so as to fill the time available
for its completion.
[...]
I agree. Some of the core team uses trello for this:
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 11:25:08 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I do like the building-block idea you suggest, but one must
think about the deeper reasons for why things are owned by
which people.
It is much easier to get motivated if you have a certain level
autonomy. Clearly, the "D
This is what a good system programming standard library should
provide:
1. Types needed to specify library APIs.
2. Functionality for accessing hardware in a non-emulated fashion.
3. Functionality that most _libraries_ need to build on (like
arrays/iterators/ranges).
4. Functionality that
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 03:49:56 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
That won't be happening anytime soon.
Until we have image and windowing in Phobos (I'm working on
both) there is no way a GUI toolkit is going in. And from what
I know there will be a LOT of work to update it.
I've read this
On 29/01/16 6:40 AM, Piotrek wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 03:49:56 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
That won't be happening anytime soon.
Until we have image and windowing in Phobos (I'm working on both)
there is no way a GUI toolkit is going in. And from what I know there
will be a LOT of
Parkinson's Law: work expands so as to fill the time available
for its completion.
Having a set of vague tasks to finish within 6 months is great,
but having a weekly more specific priority list to go along with
it would be better. If, in addition, there was some
accountability (not with
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:01:47 +, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:26:36 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
>> PyPI has is an highly opinionated metric that helps you decide what is
>> good and what is dross.
>
> Could you help us on designing one for code.dlang.org as well?
I'd
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 22:36:37 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
Longevity is an awkward one. If I create a project, do nothing
with it for four years, then make a release, will that count as
well as making a release once a month for four years? But the
other metrics should account for
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 00:28:26 UTC, Twenty Two wrote:
Parkinson's Law: work expands so as to fill the time available
for its completion.
[...]
I agree. Some of the core team uses trello for this:
https://trello.com/b/XoFjxiqG/active
However, that's not really meant for noobs and
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:15:27 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 06:17:44 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 22:48:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
I am not sure if that is the right motivation. Sounds like
recipe for bloat.
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 12:38:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
including things that some people argue shouldn't be part of a
standard library: archives and compression, cryptography,
databases, character encodings (including json and xml!), html
templating, image processing, suffix
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:26:36 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
PyPI has is an highly opinionated metric that helps you decide
what is good and what is dross.
Could you help us on designing one for code.dlang.org as well?
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 06:17:44 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 22:48:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
I am not sure if that is the right motivation. Sounds like
recipe for bloat. Good libraries evolve from being used in
real applications. Many
Some of this apparently off-topic, but I will get back on-topic by the
end.
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 21:17 +1300, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> I wasn't going to reply, until you tweeted.
Sorry for wrongly assigning geography.
> No just no.
Yes, oh yes, oh yes.
> When
I wasn't going to reply, until you tweeted.
No just no.
When dealing with tertiary institutions especially New Zealand ones,
you've got to understand they have massive pressure to get through
content. Every single class is standardized nationally, by law.
You're all worried about doing
On 2016-01-25 22:15, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
With respect, I'm not sure whether anyone in core would have the
slightless hint of knowing how UI works. (Not that I speak for anyone
but myself :-)
And you think that I have the slightest idea of what I'm doing ;)
--
/Jacob
On 2016-01-26 13:38, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Thanks for answering. I want to be convinced, and even if not, to gather
a more precise view.
The rhetoric is appreciated. What would be helpful here in addition to
it are a few links to evidence. You make lofty claims either of status
quo in
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 10:52:17 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Design patterns are not language agnostic. GoF patterns are 23
year old and many totally irrelevant with certain programming
languages. However that is a different debate for a different
place.
I found GoF underwhelming when I
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 12:46:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 08:57:44 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
Ouch yes, seen that before. I just would prefer the base
library to be exactly that a base.
I agree. Imagine if all the effort put into Phobos' extras was
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 20:38:16 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
It's not like you could just reallocate all the effort that
goes into Phobos towards the compiler and stuff.
My impression is that the majority of the contributors to Phobos
are capable D programmers.
DMD is implemented in D now,
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 21:03:01 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
Also, you skipped past the "uninterested" part - this is a
volunteer project, remember?
I didn't think it was a relevant argument as you can still write
libraries for distribution. Keep in mind that the standard
library has to be
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 21:47:41 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 21:03:01 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
Also, you skipped past the "uninterested" part - this is a
volunteer project, remember?
I didn't think it was a relevant argument as you can still
write
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 22:33:32 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
1) The prospect of getting something into the standard library
is a huge motivator for (at least some) potential contributors.
I am not sure if that is the right motivation. Sounds like recipe
for bloat. Good libraries evolve from
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 22:48:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 22:33:32 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
characteristics for basic infrastructure. People shouldn't
have to rewrite their entire stack every 6 months just because
someone thought of a better API for
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 23:04:57 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
This is why requiring modules to spend some time on DUB and/or
in `std.experimental` before freezing the API is important.
Well, there aren't enough D applications written to ensure the
usefulness of the API. Just take a look at
Or let me put it this way. If the standard library requires
POSIX, then it isn't really a standard library, but a POSIX
abstraction library...
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 08:57:44 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
Ouch yes, seen that before. I just would prefer the base
library to be exactly that a base.
I agree. Imagine if all the effort put into Phobos' extras was
put into the compiler and tooling...
On 01/25/2016 11:26 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 07:44 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-
d-announce wrote:
Could you please back up that assertion a little bit? From all I
see,
standard libraries of most languages grow very fast with each
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 17:06 +1300, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> […]
>
> Well whoever these people are, they are most certainly not the
> people
> I've seen. They wouldn't care or even want to look at PyPI.
The people you have seen are clearly not Pythonistas. This may
On 26/01/16 6:07 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 21:31 +1300, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
[…]
Nope just no.
I am only talking about newbies here.
They will pick distributions of Python that are all encompassing.
On 01/25/2016 02:03 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
If the Python, Rust, Go, etc. stories tell us anything, it is that the
days of "batteries included" distributions is long, long dead. DVCS
changes the game.
Could you please back up that assertion a little bit? From all I
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 13:08:18 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On 01/25/2016 04:17 AM, Rory McGuire via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Looking at the way we have
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 10:53:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-01-25 07:39, Andrew Edwards wrote:
I truly doubt that. It would be truly amazing if that were to
occur but
history has proven otherwise. The sentiment was expressed so
many times
that Walter was finally moved to
On 01/25/2016 04:17 AM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Looking at the way we have things now, it would actually be quite simple
to make two downloads, one with everything and one with the bare minimum.
If we changed phobos to compile like the recent vibe.d version does then
we
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On 01/25/2016 04:17 AM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
>>
>> Looking at the way we have things now, it would actually be quite simple
>> to make two
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:34:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
I guess you mean GUI not IDE?
Yes GUI... my fault, thanks!
JohnCK.
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 18:11:24 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 --
Andrei
Hi,
I am new to D, and having my own language implementation (based
off Lua) -
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 06:39:54 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 03:21:51 UTC, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 --
Andrei
[snip]
For tooling, I suggest a
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:47 +, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
[…]
>
> I'm sympathetic to this. I still just download Anaconda and not
> bother with much else.
But that is the whole point I am trying to make. Anaconda (or
Miniconda) is not a single massive monolithic library, it
On 26/01/16 5:49 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 20:34 +1300, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
[…]
I had a long post replying to Russel and to put it bluntly, its just
wrong.
We are most definitely losing people simply because they
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 20:34 +1300, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
>
[…]
> I had a long post replying to Russel and to put it bluntly, its just
> wrong.
> We are most definitely losing people simply because they expect
> certain
> code in the standard library. Like windowing
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:49:36 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
What needs to be standardized? Data structure architecture.
Already in Phobos. Cross platform Input/Output. Already in
Phobos.
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:49:36 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Why isn't Dub the way forward on
On 25 Jan 2016 7:16 PM, "Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:47 +, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
> wrote:
> >
> […]
> >
> > I'm sympathetic to this. I still just download Anaconda and not
> > bother with much
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
Hi,
I am new to D, and having my own language implementation (based
off Lua) - therefore I think I can appreciate some of the
difficulties around getting
On 25 January 2016 at 21:44, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 2016-01-25 14:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
>
> Glad to see your spirit is not easily broken. That, however, does not
>> invalidate my statement. One would think that 10 years
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 20:44:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-01-25 14:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Glad to see your spirit is not easily broken. That, however,
does not
invalidate my statement. One would think that 10 years after
being
dubbed the official graphics library for the
On 2016-01-25 14:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Glad to see your spirit is not easily broken. That, however, does not
invalidate my statement. One would think that 10 years after being
dubbed the official graphics library for the language, it would be
simple to install DMD and DWT side by side on
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Rikki Cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On 25/01/16 8:16 PM, tsbockman wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 07:03:35 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
>>
>>> The strategy should be "get rid of anything in Phobos
On 25/01/16 9:21 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Rikki Cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-announce > wrote:
On 25/01/16 8:16 PM, tsbockman wrote:
On
On 2016-01-25 07:03:35 +, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce said:
Phobos the library needs to go to be replaced by a library search and
use system. Oh we already have one, Dub.
The strategy should be "get rid of anything in Phobos that can be put
out as a separate library".
I see
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Rikki Cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On 25/01/16 9:21 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Rikki Cattermole via
>> Digitalmars-d-announce
On 25/01/16 9:57 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Rikki Cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-announce > wrote:
On 25/01/16 9:21 PM, Rory McGuire via
I've had a bit more of a looksie into splash screens and I think I would
prefer if it was completely separate actually.
Its not too hard, but its has semi incompatible features as to a window.
On 2016-01-25 07:39, Andrew Edwards wrote:
I truly doubt that. It would be truly amazing if that were to occur but
history has proven otherwise. The sentiment was expressed so many times
that Walter was finally moved to sanction DWT as the official GUI for D
in 2006. Even a newsgroup was made
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
On 25/01/16 3:37 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
There is a couple of things I want on there.
1. scope to be fixed and fully implemented
(I'll bring some use cases to the table)
2. @assumenogc or something similar.
That way
On 25/01/16 4:13 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 01/24/2016 10:07 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
1. scope to be fixed and fully implemented
(I'll bring some use cases to the table)
2. @assumenogc or something similar.
That way IAllocator can be @nogc. Which to me is a requirement
before
On 01/24/2016 10:07 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
1. scope to be fixed and fully implemented
(I'll bring some use cases to the table)
2. @assumenogc or something similar.
That way IAllocator can be @nogc. Which to me is a requirement
before it is out of experimental.
Both are under the
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
Something went wrong here:
We fell short of our 2000 pull requests goal in H2 2015. We
have had only 1 1378 pull requests.
In addition to the extraneous
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
For PRs, I suggest the goal to be number of PRs MERGED instead of
created. That may provide the core team a subconsious incentive
to look at long pending
On 25/01/16 4:21 PM, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
For PRs, I suggest the goal to be number of PRs MERGED instead of
created. That may provide the core team a subconsious
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 03:49:56 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 25/01/16 4:21 PM, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 --
Andrei
For PRs, I suggest the goal to be number of PRs
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 03:21:51 UTC, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 --
Andrei
[snip]
For tooling, I suggest a look at GUI/IDEs, now that
dlangui/dlangide seems a good
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:49 +1300, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
>
[…]
> That won't be happening anytime soon.
> Until we have image and windowing in Phobos (I'm working on both)
> there
> is no way a GUI toolkit is going in. And from what I know there will
> be
> a LOT of
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 07:03:35 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
The strategy should be "get rid of anything in Phobos that can
be put
out as a separate library".
This makes no sense as a standard: since neither DMD nor druntime
is allowed to depend upon Phobos, everything in Phobos *could*
On 25/01/16 7:39 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 03:21:51 UTC, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
[snip]
For tooling, I suggest a look at GUI/IDEs, now
On 25/01/16 7:18 PM, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 05:50:34 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
I want us to hold off on that as well.
I agree that we need a more solid base.
I want people to really have a go with making GUI toolkits in D
without the worry about how to do the cross
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:37:40 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
I'm not fond of the militaristic terminology for participants. Novice,
adept, master, maybe?
The section on safety is pretty short. I'd like to see in it:
*
On 25/01/16 6:47 PM, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 03:49:56 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 25/01/16 4:21 PM, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
For PRs, I
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
My biggest issue with these documents is that they have good
ideas but rarely have plans to achieve them. As a consequence,
most of these documents say how
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 05:50:34 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
I want us to hold off on that as well.
I agree that we need a more solid base.
I want people to really have a go with making GUI toolkits in D
without the worry about how to do the cross platformy technical
things.
Is
98 matches
Mail list logo