--- Nelson wrote:
--- Gillam wrote:
The impulse to speak was vague,
amporphous, but the sentences worked. I find that phenomenon
interesting. Maybe it's related to all this.
+++ Maybe similar to hearing your voice speaking to someone without
your direct attention on it and finding
--- Nelson wrote:
If I am sitting with a group of vegetarians enjoying my
cheeseburgher and thinking how good it is, I would
doubt that thought would be anyone elses.
Oh, come on -- you know they want it! ; - )
Good point to make, though, in this context: Even though
consciousness may be
--- sparaig wrote:
--- Rick Archer wrote:
I've heard both Maharishi and local enlightened
friends say that they're often surprised by the
things they find themselves doing. ...
Another friend said, I was going to the post
office but found myself at the coffee shop, implying
Comments interleaved below.
-- Premanand Paul Mason wrote:
The Hindi word 'malamuutra' seems to mean mal+muutra i.e. 'excrement
and urine'. That is to say, Guru Dev was saying that for nine months
he was confined in his own filth. Neither translator thinks to
include mention of this
--- Nelson wrote:
--- authfriend wrote:
I sometimes find that I seem to know things I have no
normal basis for knowing. ... It's only when I stop and
ask myself, How do I know
this? that I realize there's a discrepancy, that it seems
to have bypassed the usual routes by which I
I recall a story Lucy Lediaev to our science of creative
intelligence class of Maharishi rushing to catch a plane.
Because he was late he told his driver to run the red
lights on the way to the airport. His entourage trailed
further and further behind him because they couldn't
just plow
I see this interview was conducted by one
Chris Attwood. I worked with a man of that
name at Newcomb Government Securities in
Fort Collins in the early '80s. (That was Larry
Price's company, which he stocked with TMers
for a spell.) I wonder if the Chris Attwood I
knew then is the same guy
--- Michael Dean Goodman wrote:
you folks who joust and attack and bully
and rant, hiding behind anonymity here - in
my opinion you are simply cowards. Prove me
wrong. Reveal yourselves. Take responsibility for
your words. Step out of the shadows into the light.
All right. So be it.
Thank you very kindly! As my party favor to
everyone, I will refrain from any other posts
today.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
--- jim_flanegin wrote:
It is a dreamy and sugary thought to associate some sort of gentle
pious life with liberation, but in fact there is no connection at
all. None.
Gentle, pious living has helped me enormously in the past,
so I don't discount its value. But I can't say as it
--- jim_flanegin wrote:
As to whether the benefit of the P group is for all, I am
skeptical. It begs the question, 'what *isn't* for the benefit of
all?'. Can't think of anything...
Second-hand cigarette smoke?
Regardless, you have a fortunate point of view!
I don't discount the Purusha
--- sparaig wrote:
Someone died because they didn't have policies
in place to handle that kind of person
I understood the policies were indeed in place.
The people implementing the policies didn't see
the danger. They thought their actions in accord
with the policy were adequate.
--- sparaig wrote:
Bush and many members of his administration couldn't
get a job as a seargant at a missile silo.
This goes on the list of keeper quotes.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with
--- Vaj wrote:
It proved to me that if the underlying and deepest motivation was not
pure, the result would ultimately reflect this. Therefore it was
always important to check your own motivation. It forms the basis
of all action in the relative.
Is there a way to retire an originating
--- authfriend wrote:
Indeed. Be interesting to hear from him directly
as to why he did it [touring with the Bleep crowd].
It's surprising to me that
MMY didn't try to stop him from doing it.
A story about John Hagelin touring:
I'm trying to summon a memory of a conversation
with a
Vaj wrote:
I wonder if your observation syncs with his
publication of Is Consciousness the Unified Field?
Seems to me that lecture came out some years later.
So, is it the sense of the meeting that consciousness
is *not* the unified field?
Yahoo! Groups
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
Vaj wrote:
I wonder if your observation syncs with his
publication of Is Consciousness the Unified Field?
Seems to me that lecture came out some years later
Do I have to touch others to get the benefits for myself?
Can I just tap my own forehead to get a kundalini rush?
Will I be trained to tell how much kundalini a person can
handle?
When people come to me with their health in jeopardy
because their kundalini is out of control, wil I be
Comments interleaved below.
--- Irmeli Mattsson wrote:
There is a little booklet written by a Finnish
clergyman Raimo Mäkelä.
He has been working for the Finnish Established
Church. The title of
the book would be in English something like : The
healthy mind as a
mask. It was
In _Path of Light_, Robert Perry says that everyone
wears a mask. He takes this teaching from the Course
in Miracles.
Just got that book, Patrick. :-)
JohnY
Are you studying the Course, or thinking about it?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- jyouells2000 wrote:
CIM always stikes me
as trancending through the intellect, sort of adviata in Christian
terminology.
Perry describes the Course as like a verbal symphony. A
theme comes in and changes shape, them another theme
picks up and starts developing, then a third them comes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wonder how one determines the location of a
brahmastan. Do you balance the square meters
of the surrounding countryside? Measure
) and therefore relies more on spherical geometry. If you
could then rubbersheet it to it's spheroidal dimensions specific
for India, you might have something. Or might not.
On Jan 20, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
I wonder how one determines the location of a
brahmastan. Do you
--- feste37 wrote:
I read the whole text of his [OBL's] message.
Where did you read it? I only saw excerpts.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
If I weren't so lazy I'd maintain a website for all
these wonderful inventions one hears about
periodically. Some time back in this forum we
read about an electric motor powered by the
earth's magnetic field. I've seen reports on --
and owned -- devices that splice to the fuel line
to
I wonder how one determines the location of a
brahmastan. Do you balance the square meters
of the surrounding countryside? Measure the
linear feet? It mean nothing, really. I'm just
feeling mathematical these days, I guess.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- TurquoiseB wrote:
--- authfriend wrote:
Sometimes it takes more spine to go along with
something and just absorb the scorn for the sake
of a future goal.
There you have it. You are suggesting that it would
be ethical for a person to lie and pretend to be
something that he's not
It's been a while since I've done this, but my calculator
is darn smart, so let's see what we get:
Loan: US $2,500
Payment: $50/mo.
Interest rates:
Prime rate on 19 Jan 06: 7.25%
Excellent credit: 7.25 + 0.375 = 7.63%
Good credit: 7.25 + 2 = 9.25%
Fair credit: 7.25 + 4 = 11.25%
At a time when the nation is highly influenced by
religiously conservative politicians, I'm surprised
more people don't take the tack Steven Druker
does below: ask these people to reconcile their
policies with their religious beliefs.
For example, I've wondered why the Christians
among the
--- Robert Gimbel wrote:
A leader like MLK, for example, or Gandhi, in India, has much more
staying power, because their message is based on love, which is the
only thing that +Does+ have staying power...
I agree that love lasts, but I don't see other non-violent
political movements
A friend forwarded a picture of a friendly barbecue joint offering lard based
tofu. The sign
says, Sidhas Welcome. Can anyone identify the location?
To see it, visit http://tinyurl.com/77jxa
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples
--- Vaj wrote:
Vaj wrote:
I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure
vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be
enlightenment.
Without breaking any vows I think it's safe to say that since you
need to perfect the generation stage before perfecting
--- Vaj wrote:
Vaj wrote:
I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure
vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be
enlightenment.
Without breaking any vows I think it's safe to say that since you
need to perfect the generation stage before perfecting
--- shempmcgurk wrote:
I remember some sort of irritating species of birds that would swoop
down around my head as I went to and from the frats.
Red-winged blackbirds. Very territorial. They flourished in
the now-drained wetland some called Jyotir Marsh.
http://tinyurl.com/8ogr8
--- Vaj wrote:
I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure
vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be
enlightenment.
Vaj, I'm going to have to ask you to elaborate on
this a bit. I can see how seeing one's lover as
the Deity would indicate a lofty level
--- TurquoiseB wrote:
I understand. I often feel the same way. You *do*
feel compassion for the people telling you their
sad stories. But at the same time, you realize
that they're just stories.
One measure of a friend is whether he can make me
laugh at my problems. If he's not taking
--- anonymousff2 wrote:
M suggests that comedy is only funny because it presents
something odd in the context of some evenness, where the
evenness has to do with the good feeling that exists between the
comedian and the audience, and the oddness has to do with an
unexpected way of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ysoy10li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---Anybody remember the night hawks at MIU ???
They were so exhilarating to watch !! -- they would circle upwards to
suddenly plumb-plunge free-fall. A sharp, sudden arc at the end at terminal
velocity would produce
--- authfriend wrote:
--- Gillam wrote:
Notice the CC tenet in that phrase -- the enlightened
person does everything in a life-supporting way.
Does Nature ever want someone to make a mistake (in the
relative sense) because the mistake will actually turn
out to have life-supporting
--- authfriend wrote:
--- Patrick wrote:
More recently acquired positivist thinking
refuses to even entertain the premise.
Say more...
About the positivist thinking? It's just a scholarly-sounding
excuse for not speculating about things beyond my ken,
which most everything seems
I hadn't ever really understood -- or thought about --
why the intellect needs to be sharp to realize enlightenment.
Or if I did, I forgot what I knew. So the explanation below was
interesting. Thanks.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
a_non_moose_ff wrote:
Locking ones happiness to where the rock goes
will only bring pain. Happiness is a warm rock --
rolling the rock.
I recall a section in Jack London's _Call of the Wild_ that
discusses the dogs' unending yearning to pull the sleds.
They don't care about the end point.
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
What the project is doesn't matter. Its not the fruit of the action
that paramount. Its the masters reaction. And the process of intense
focus on one BIG thing. Its all a process to root out vasannas.
Life itself seems to provide plenty of opportunities for
action
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
And its not a path for everyone, or most. Its for a few that want or
need it.
The key is intense focus on one Big thing, a project beyond oneself.
All energy focussed on that one big social, not personal, project.
Attention on all other desires fades and the
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
what specific
achievements do you feel will bring you fulfillment?
We may be talking about two different fulfillments.
I'm talking about all the admitttedly fleeting stuff,
from the satisfaction that comes from articulating
a thought on Fairfield Life to fixing
What I'm picking up from a_non_moose's observation
is that MMY-prescribed Big Projects are just that --
prescriptions for specific individuals. Like medical
prescriptions, they could harm those for whom such
a course is not indicated.
Medicine is a poison when taken by the wrong people
at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Gillam wrote:
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
what specific
achievements do you feel will bring you fulfillment?
We may be talking about two different fulfillments.
I'm talking about all the
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
MMY said something like, Before god, we should be just like a dog,
just estatically eager and happy to do whatever is 'asked' --
presented before us.
Byron Katie would love it.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern
on 1/9/06 3:55 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Maharishi_Mahesh_Yogi/message/2274
These pictures are how old? Seems I saw most of them
a few years ago. I wonder how those scenes look now.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
on 1/9/06 5:06 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So MMY is God, in the eyes of many/most of his followers? Did you ever
feel that way? Did youknow anyone who did?
I believe a more common phrasing is that Maharishi
speaks for nature, or if you're really hard core, for Nature.
I
Rudy, wassup? You still in Hawaii? Doing any writing?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The rap i heard from Haglan and the TM radio station was incredulous
bordering on the insane..on Sunday 1/8. He said 2005 was a good
year, the best in many for tragedies
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
--- Patrick wrote:
It makes me think I'm in CC.
Is that important to you?
I'd like to be enlightened, yeah, even if it's baby
enlightenment. But it's a casual desire, like my
desires for wealth and women. I'd like to have them,
but I'm not going to bother
What's the title of this song? I've not heard it. The lyrics are great. I'd
like to sample it at
the iTunes store.
Thanks.
--- Don Henley:
From the Arizona desert
To the Salisbury Plain
Lights on the horizon
Patterns on the grain
Anxious eyes turned upward
Clutching souvenirs
Carrying
--- TurquoiseB wrote:
This is a city full of wealthy older men on whose
arms are women who would never be seen with them
except for the fact that they're wealthy.
So I've noticed. But it was not until this post that I was
inspired to buy Diamonds are a girl's best friend from
iTunes.
--- TurquoiseB wrote:
It's called They're not here, they're not coming,
from Don's Inside Job album. He's a master of
the wry, satirical social comment. While you're
sampling, try this one from the Eagles' Hell
Freezes Over album:
Get Over It
BTW, if you're sampling Inside Job,
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
This is the real meaning of The Myth of Sisyphus, IMV. Pushing the
rock up the hill, only to have it fall down, time and time again, is
really a process of ripping out vasanas.
Interesting, in the light of your experience. Although I
would have thought the opposite
--- Peter wrote:
my intellectual
concerns/interests regarding CC (baby realization) are
largely different than the author of this post and the
author seems to make some, not all, conceptual
distinctions that don't seem very relevent to CC.
Most of these 20 questions strike me as a
Judy writes:
I've always figured that what is called self-
actualization *is* what MMY calls CC.
Self-actualization certainly *sounds* like the self being aware of itself,
which is one
characteristic of CC. But from what I've read of self-actualized behavior, it
simply
describes people who
--- Vaj wrote:
IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
transformation to uproot vasanas.
Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to investigations
into ways to
uproot those vasanas. Others have been blacklisted from the TMO for making
those
investigations.
--- Vaj wrote:
IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
transformation to uproot vasanas.
Patrick wrote:
Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to
investigations into ways to uproot those vasanas. Others have
been blacklisted from the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Vaj wrote:
IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
transformation to uproot vasanas.
Patrick
--- bbrigante wrote:
CNN never said that Hagelin's votes in Florida made Bush win.
Actually, Hagelin himself remarked that it's conceivable
that the votes for him could have made the difference for Gore.
I heard him say it, although I forget the venue and context.
Hagelin's strategy was to
--- TurquoiseB posted:
Robertson suggests God smote Sharon
Evangelist links Israeli leader's stroke to 'dividing God's land'
(CNN) -- Television evangelist Pat Robertson suggested Thursday that
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's stroke was divine retribution
for the Israeli
Patrick wrote:
You mean to tell me God cares more about this section
of dirt than that section of dirt?
--- Bhairitu wrote:
It's sorta like some people who believe a polluted river in India has
special properties.
That said, it occurs to me that selected parts of the
world are
I learned the hard way not to reveal names of people
I instructed in TM. Someone I had instructed told me
she did not appreciate having someone yell across
the workplace cafeteria, Hey! I heard you learned TM!
With that I generalized that discretion is always a
sound policy, whether
Eighteen out of 20 for me, too, which surprised me. I didn't think I'd do that
well.
Did you read about Ekman's work in the New Yorker last year? I'd love the
ability to read faces
the way he can. The article told about a flash of a smirk that gave away Bill
Clinton when he
was lying about
Thanks for the cost comparisons.
I suspect that, had the TMO continued to amass
good research to support its case, a $1,000 course
fee would be reasonable today. But the ideological
zeal, the death of Skip Alexander and Maharishi's
abandonment of science all demolished that
possibility. TM
--- off_world_beings posted:
REHABILITATION 2004:
The Journal of Offender Rehabilitation,
http://tinyurl.com/cqrn5
Irrelevant to a pre-indictment individual who's considering learning a
meditation
technique. May be of interest to government officials, though. The real need
here is to
--- cardemaister wrote:
Taimni's translation:
It (samaadhi) is nearest to those whose
desire (for samaadhi) is intensely strong.
sparaig wrote:
When samadhi is close, unstressing is strong.
Sparaig's translation makes more sense to me. Going
back to my empirical view of things,
--- sparaig wrote:
researchers didn't simulate the REAL conditions of winter:
changing temperatures constantly.
Yes, good point. And have you noticed how people can
be in a warm, dry room and feel the influence of cold and
wetness outside? It's as if the cold or moisture or wind
have a
--- Peter wrote:
Why the gnostic tradition died out is open
to hypothesis, but the direct experiential realization
of Christ was replaced by conceptual dogma.
Robert Perry puts it this way, in his writings
about the Course in Miracles:
About 2,000 years ago Jesus offered a revolutionary
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
Anyone else notice any food/dream connections?
Maharishi Amrit Kalash nectar in the evening would
generate more lively dreaming. I rather enjoyed it. A
friend, on the other hand, stopped taking his bedtime
dose in order to sleep more quietly.
I wrote:
We have lots of people here who've used TM mantras at
some length. I'd love to read people's experiences in terms
of what each of us has observed firsthand in all these
decades of using our mantras. Get this discussion out
of the realm of theory and into our direct
--- authfriend wrote:
*words* can't be trusted to express experience
in a way that actually communicates it. And the
deeper and more subtle the experience, the greater
the potential disjunction between the experience
and the translation into words.
And yet, and yet... when someone
--- Vaj wrote:
I've experienced the form and the formless aspect of my TM ishta
mantra. In order for that to manifest however I went to a teacher who
instructed me in how to create the yantra, the visual form of the
devata. The yantra of your devata relates to the aspect of seeing.
--- sparaig wrote:
Being without expectations becomes less and less easy the more you
hear your own and other's experiences, especially in a casual context.
If I'd reading you right, Lawson, you're saying it's better
to be innocent, without expectations fostered by hearing
other people's
--- Peter wrote:
You might characterize the TMO as a religion, but the
techniques themselves I have a hard time seeing as
religious in nature.
I, too, have a hard time seeing the techniques as
religious. But there's been talk in this forum of the
mantras being devas that the teacher
--- Peter wrote:
The TMO has always related higher levels of
consciousness with increased moral behavior, but the
research is pretty weak in this area.
Have you actually leafed through the journals to review
research on TM and moral behavior, Peter? I somehow
got the impression the
--- Peter wrote:
But what is a religion? I certainly see how someone
would call the practice of TM religious because the
bija mantras are associated with certain Hindu
dieties, but does that make it a religion? Ask a hindu
if TM is a religion and he'll think the very question
is absurd. Is
--- authfriend wrote:
Gillam wrote:
Yet people in the know tell me [the mantra]
is an ishta-deva -- the
god one prays most (Wikipedia).
People in *what* know? People with knowledge of what?
I can't cite posts, but I seem to recall that people who've
seen lists of ishta devas have
--- Peter wrote:
I'd have to look at it again. But I remember whenever
I looked at it I was always bothered by some aspects
of it. Do you have a reference?
Unfortunately, no. I spent some time Googling but couldn't
find a study you could read on the web. (I seldom find studies
I can
--- Peter wrote:
According to the Sri Tantra (i think its that one) the
bija mantras used in TM are the seed form of specific
devatas(Saraswati and Lakshmi). The effect of the
mantra, according to MMY, would be two-fold. The
enlivening of that specific value of nature in one's
life through
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The general public (whomever they are!) seem to like
simple answers with black and white distinctions.
Unfortunately life is not like that.
Last year I read in one of David Brooks' columns
in the New York Times that the
--- authfriend wrote:
The more abstract the understanding of the nature of
devas, the less religious they seem. Sort of like
Christ the divine/human center of the Christian
religion, versus the universal Christ as a mode of
consciousness.
I've been trying to remember if I've ever heard
--- TurquoiseB wrote:
I'm just saying that people would *like* to believe
it was true because that might suggest that what
they were involved with back then (TM) was more
important than it really was.
I believe it because the U.S. government has demonstrated
itself to be more intrusive
--- Rick Archer wrote:
And although on some superficial level it may be true that the vibratory
influence of the mantra causes TM to work, ultimately, the benefits result
from aligning oneself with the impulse of intelligence or Devata that the
mantra represents.
Is there any way to tell
--- Rick Archer wrote:
Maharishi always said, and we said in lectures, that you could
transcend on any sound but that the mantras, due to their life-supporting
vibratory quality, provided benefits that other sounds didn't.
This dovetails nicely with Peter's post about his TM
mantra
emboldened Islamic hardliners are doing
their best to eradicate sin
and women are their prime targets.
When adharma prevails, O Krishna,
the women of the family become
corrupt, and with the corruption
of women, O Varshneya, intermixture
of castes arises.
Bhavagad-Gita Chapter 1, verse 41
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
emboldened Islamic hardliners are doing
their best to eradicate sin
and women are their prime targets.
When adharma prevails, O Krishna,
the women of the family become
corrupt, and with the
Responses interleaved.
--- Sal Sunshine wrote:
Yes, I am aware of the TMO dogma regarding stress in the atmosphere,
as I said. That is why I am asking--do you really believe that stress,
as defined in human terms,
Maharishi's definition of stress is effectively a definition
of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.azstarnet.com/metro/108251
Thanks for this. Squidd -- two d's -- was in my small group on TTC Phase 3 in
1977, along
with MUM administrator Brad Mylett. I'd lost track of Squidd.
--- Vaj wrote:
conditioned wrong Views are spouted as if they are
correct. Because they believe--without critical decision making and
self-experimentation.
One thing that keeps me enthusiastic about TM
is the close correlation between Maharishi's
descriptions and my experiences. A
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 8:41 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
The other thing is -- and this is the more cogent
point -- I believe we manifest *whatever* we believe.
I believe you answered your own question.
Come to think
--- Vaj wrote:
Each darshana has it's own internal logic. If knowledge is structured
in consciousness then each darshana/View relating to a specific state
of consciousness will be unique but appropriately descriptive of that
state. It's fashionable, esp. among paths that are incomplete
--- jim_flanegin wrote:
enlightenment does not adhere
to ANY tradition. It is what it is. Period.
I've been given to understand that enlightenment
changes quite a bit from one spiritual tradition to
another. I'm told, for instance, that Buddhists
disagree with Hindus on key points, and
--- TurquoiseB wrote:
Gillam wrote:
View determines fruit, as Vaj quoted a master
as saying. Or as Dana Sawyer says, precept
determines percept.
I have to agree. That which one expects seems to
color awakening into the unexpected. The experience
it what it is, but when it comes to
--- jim_flanegin wrote:
Gillam wrote:
That said, I don't much hear Jim and Tom and Peter
and such lot talking in Maharishi's idioms. For example,
this whole notion of losing a personal self was totally
absent from any understanding I ever had of the Science
of
--- Peter wrote:
projective
identification. The person in question unconsciously
projects a unintegrated/disowned aspect of their
personality onto others and provokes them into
responding/behaving in accord with that unintegrated
part. People have a tendency to go off on the person
in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I marvel at my assholeness to this day.
We're all marvelous assholes at times, aren't we? Like
I love this kind of thinking. It makes total sense.
It's sorta my experience. It's what has drawn me
into this pursuit of enlightenment. But there seem
to be many cases where seemingly awakened
people -- famous masters and participants in this
forum -- don't behave as Dr. Deepak describes
601 - 700 of 1014 matches
Mail list logo
