Rory:
> > If you would rather not do the Work, that is (apparently) your
> > prerogative :-)
Judy:
> Try again, Rory, you still ain't getting it.
Maybe Rory can have Jim process it in the Cray sitting on top of his head.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > &g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Great. You go do that, and let us know what
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > Great. You go do that, and let us know what
> > > > > you discover, OK?
> > > >
> > > > And Judy will keep complaining about being in
> > > > ignorance. It's a status quo thang... :-)
> > >
> > > It is the small self, which is *not* Judy, fighting for its
> > > illusory life...
> >
September 29, 2005 NYT
In a Melting Trend, Less Arctic Ice to Go Around
By ANDREW C. REVKIN
The floating cap of sea ice on the Arctic Ocean shrank this summer to
what is probably its smallest size in at least a century of record
keeping, continuing a trend toward less summer ice, a team of clima
> > U:
> > > And when this happens, in this dreamed-of future,
> > > wave to the pigs as they fly by... :-)
A:
> > The ones emerging from your butt?
U:>
> Mixed metaphor. It's monkeys that fly out of
> one's butt, and pigs that fly. :-)
All possibilities dude.
U:
> And when this happens, in this dreamed-of future,
> wave to the pigs as they fly by... :-)
The ones emerging from your butt?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.
I am glad Shemp has guaranteed that this stuff has nothing to due with
Greenhouse Emissions. Otherwise it would be scary.
-
A natural cycle in the polar atmosphere, the Arctic Oscillation, that
contributed to the reduction in Arctic ice in the past was not a
significant f
Using Uncs term, or what I can remember of it, uncletenspaltz, or
whatever, as I have come to understand, it includes all who are
progressing spiritually, from the humblest initiate to a full Buddha
who has achieved the Rainbow body. A nice group. Everyone is
uncletenspaltzen.
M's criteria for suc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Akasha:
> > > > But what is your definition of CC? (but define it in a non-
> see
Akasha:
> > But what is your definition of CC? (but define it in a non-seeking
> > way :) )
Judy:
> In my understanding of how MMY uses the term, CC
> is permanent, 24-hour-a-day foreground PC.
Is there "no-I"?
Is one in CC, at home with all knowledge?
In CC, is one spontaneously in accord wit
Akasha:
> >
> > For example, is the experience of "no I" both a
> > necessary and
> > sufficent criteria. Is constant foreground PC a
> > sufficnet criteria for
> > CC? Is absence of anger (per many scriptural
> > references) a necessary
> > criteria?
Peter:
> Of course I am from the no "I" sch
Akasha:
> > Why not then just drop all discussions and concepts of E.
Unc:
> NOW you're talking! :-)
A:
Yes. I have been suggeting such for some time.
But I appear to violate the rule at times because its interesting to
me to understand what people mean when they introduce and use the E
term,
A:
> > > > I think clear terms can facilitate discussion.
> >
> > U:
> > > But what does the discussion facilitate?
> >
> > A: Well, it happens. its value -- maybe none. But you suggested
> > you have gained great value from recent discussions here. So you
> > tell me.
U:
> Something someo
Judy:
> > To expand a bit: You said in another post that it
> > feels "false" to you to "want" a higher state of
> > attention.
Unc:
> Not so much "false" as completely unproductive.
> To do so takes one out of Now
Akahsa:
Then perhaps the "attention" that can maintain PC in foreground is not
Akasha:
> > Terming that as "E", to me, goes beyond reporting. its labeling.
> > And since it differs from what many understand that term to be,
> > it simply promotes miscommunication.
Unc:
> Fine. I've already told you that the only reason I
> was using the E word was because it was already
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is constant foreground PC a sufficnet criteria
> > for CC?
>
> That's how MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thus I favor just saying what is, instead of relying on unreliable
> > intermediary symbo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > I'll order some pizza
Akasha:
> > yes. Reminds me of EST.
Judy:
> Even est had a method to sort of shock people into
> it. The whole "training" was one big koan, it seems
> to me: the first weekend, they convinced you that you
> had total control over everything; the second weekend,
> they convinced you that you ha
> > Akasha:
> > > > Pure consciousness begins from the first mediation. If not
> > > > before.
> >
> > Uuc:
> > > Before. There has never been a moment in my life when
> > > I was not enlightened.
A:
> > That's the one point on all of this where I think we differ.
Again, I see no value i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'll
order some pizza from cave service and think about it over
> lunch. :-)
Dude, if you are living in Paris and you order up take-out pizza --
you are not only way UnAwake, you are a gastronomic baffoon. :)
--
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akasha:
> > > Does it strike anyone else as funny, even absurd, that the whole
> > > paradigm about enlightenment on this list is dichotomous,
digital, either "on or off"?
>
&g
Akasha:
> > Does it strike anyone else as funny, even absurd, that the whole
> > paradigm about enlightenment on this list is dichotomous, digital,
> > either "on or off"?
Unc:
> YES! That's exactly the issue.
> I realized that some time back, during the discussions
> about 'appreciation.' So
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote
Judy:
> I don't recall having read anyone saying here
> that you meditate for many years with no
> discernible change and then suddenly be in
> CC, at least not as the standard pattern with
> TM. But I could have missed it.
Its diologues over the past 3-4 years. And its not an explicit claim.
Bu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To hold, as some appear to, that we meditate for 20-30 years and
> > then one day, the room goes from total da
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Akasha: :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > To hold, as some appear to, th
Akasha: :
> > > >
> > > > > To hold, as some appear to, that we meditate for 20-30 years
> > > > > and then one day, the room goes from total darkness to total
> > > > > light, is funny, in a charming way. So to the extent people
> > > > > keep insisting IT is already there, they are correct --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> But they have to get 'scholarships' in order for the official TMO to
> teach them to mediatate. What is wrong with this picture? A sort of
> elitist materialistic welfare spirituality boggling. I mean I
> under
> Yup, what he said. All this justification of possibly Maharishi's,
> Bevan's and Haglin's behavior - I just don't get it. You wouldn't
> expect that stuff from your friends, or business associates, or even
> honorable enemies.
>
> JohnY
Since some of my recent posts may be rolled up in the "al
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To hold, as some appear to, that we meditate for 20-30 years and
> > then one day, the room
If you need to refer to prior posts, create a link to them.
Oh, and be nice. :)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Contorversial? I thought that's the policy most colleges had.
>
> Sal
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2005, at 8:45 PM, akasha_108 wrote:
>
> > At the University of California, Berkeley, a
A:
> > > > No, thats not quite the angle that struck me as so funny. The
> > > > deliciousness of the phrase is more a "mu" experience, a
> la "whats
> > > > wrong with this picture."
J:
> > > What's wrong with the picture of somebody not
> > > wanting to be overshadowed? You've got me
> > > cur
>
> The Ann Arbor News
> Packed crowd hears David Lynch Filmmaker shares zeal
> for transcendental meditation
>
> Monday, September 26, 2005
> BY JENN MCKEE
> News Arts Writer
>
http://www.mlive.com/entertainment/aanews/index.ssf?/base/features-0/1127745609242440.xml&coll=2
>
> If you arrived on
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Part two is next week, I think. Don't miss it.
Did you see two hours or one hour last night? I have a two hour
version on tonight. Is there an additional 2 hour segment (four hours
total)?
Or is 2 hours the whole
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> But was/is arguably the
> most important poet of the twentieth century. The only
> person I can think of whose poetry possibly rocked as many
> people's lives (in the sense of radically shifting their
> states of attention)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh, yes! it must be enlightenment - I-I understand all [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ;-) Amazing
>
> Yup. But at the same time, it's not the kinda
> conversation you necessarily want to add your
> name to in the list o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050927/wr_nm/media_blogging_dc
Dogging sounds more interesing than some blogging. Those Brits don't
seem that stupid. :)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akasha:
> > I rather look directly into the projector from 3 " away.
>
> Rory:
> That explains a lot :-)
When you are the screen, you can drink life from a firehose.
Akasha Sutras VI:23:07
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> http://www.merchantsofdeception.com/
>
>
> On Sep 27, 2005, at 12:34 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> > > You *could* ask whether these other groups
> > > are also cults. For example, anyone who has
> > > ever worked f
Judy:
> > > > > OK. I think you're suggesting that it's something of
an infinite regress, that one can be overshadowed by
the desire not to be overshadowed.
Akasha:
> > > > No, thats not quite the angle that struck me as so funny. The
deliciousness of the phrase is more a "mu" experience, a
l
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When people behave rightly, a corresponding atmosphere is naturally
> produced, and when such an influence is dominant, the individual's
> tendencies are affected by it.
>
> If in such an atmosphere of grace and glory a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
&
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The king and rajas will disappear overnight without money behind
> them. The bank accounts and trade/service marks will mark continuity.
> When was the last time you heard King Tony on a topic that wasn't
> ceremon
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > May I suggest, that while you brought up the phrase in your post,
> > that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know of two incidents, one for each of them, where force bordering
on rape was used, but they didn't go through with it.
So "No means No" finally sunk in. A bit later than optimal, but
thankfully early enough to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know of two incidents, one for each of them, where force bordering
on rape was used, but they didn't go through with it.
So "No means No" finally sunk in. A bit later than optimal, but
thankfully early enough to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's like saying that a dog is a small carnivorous
> animal with fur and a tail that is usually kept as a
> pet, then looking at a cat, finding that it is also
> a small carnivorous animal with fur and a tail that
> i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Judy:
> > Well, that could be the last experience you need to
> > have to wake up, no?
> Depends on what you mean by "wake up". In general one gains "the
View", the living, breathing experience and certainty as to what the
st
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bad ju-ju. Wouldn't touch it.
There you go with your anti-semetic remarks again.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yaho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If J and B are coercing students to have sex, why are the students
> > not reporting it? A comprehensive rep
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I'm wondering what exactly separates a cult from a "regular" religion
> > to begin with. The main difference that I can see in most ca
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> My only criterion, for instance, is not to
> > be overshadowed.
Thinking about that thought, paraphrasing, "I just don't want to be
oveshadowed" gets funnier and funnier the more it is contemplated and
considered. Its l
> > > Hagelin is a figurehead for the university. Indeed, he is
> BEYOND being a mere professor.
> >
> > Why is celebrity a factor for acts between consenting adults?
>
>
> I don't think it should be a factor.
>
> And, yes, I agree that anyone 18 years or older is old enough to
> freely ch
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Tom T writes:
> > > No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to be able
> to hold all t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
&g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/26/05 7:12 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> on 9/26/05 2:28 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/26/05 7:35 PM, akasha_108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Does Haglin still teach courses? I don't know. My impression is he has
> > his intitute and all and travels and spe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Judy responds:
>
> The bottom line being that there is nothing that
> can be said about Brahman, positive or negative,
> of which the opposite is not also the case,
> because Brahman is One withou
Interesting postmodern, feminist / post feminist perspectives.
-
Open Debate: Sex with the Teacher
Click for a printer friendly version of this article
E Ruth Klein
E R Klein argues that no good reason has yet been given for academic
institutions to condemn consensual sex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark meredith writes:
> " In a sermon, Samuel Parris, the minister
> in whose house the whole thing started, stated, "We are either saints
> or Devils: the Scripture gives us no medium"
>
> TOm T:
If J and B are coercing students to have sex, why are the students not
reporting it? A comprehensive reporting and review system is in place.
http://www.mum.edu/safety/bulletin.html
Ideal Education for Orderly Behavior
Compliance with all national, state, and local laws and ordinances is
a prer
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2294/is_2003_June/ai_103381809
Contrapower sexual harassment: A survey of students and faculty members
Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, June, 2003 by Eros DeSouza, A.
Gigi Fansler
new
Although Congress passed Title IX of the Education Amendments in
http://www.yaleherald.com/article.php?Article=2475
Forbidden fruit: student-faculty relationships
How does Yale policy deal with romance in the classroom?
BY KRISTEN VON HOFFMANN
At the University of California, Berkeley, a new controversial policy
forbids "romantic or sexual" relationships betw
> In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But there's coercion and coercion. It doesn't have
> to involve a demand for obedience to be coercive when
> the power relationship is unequal.
In most relationships each party brings different values and
dysfunctions
http://slate.msn.com/id/2093351
Off Limits
Should students be allowed to hook up with professors?
By Laura Kipnis
Posted Friday, Jan. 2, 2004, at 8:17 AM PT
Illustration by Robert Neubecker
The burning academic question of the day: Should we professors be
permitted to "hook up with" our students
http://chronicle.com/errors.dir/noauthorization.php3?page=/che-data/articles.dir/articles-41.dir/issue-24.dir/24b00101.htm
When Students Make Sexual Advances
By David R. Pichaske
Recent bans on professor-student relationships are founded on two
assumptions: that sex between teachers and students
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on 9/26/05 10:06 AM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Why would I care? Hmm, let's see...perhaps because
> > >> of the unbeli
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > While it is certainly boorish behavior and I do not
> > support it in the least, the ladies can say no.
>
> That apply to Maharishi as well?
Why would it not?
I know a standard theme revolves around "unquesion
The following excerpts raise some interesting questions. (Some
excerpts are grouped by theme and not in their original order.
Apologies if any critical context is lost.)
* Does any group of humans, particularly age cohorts, deserve or
require special treatment and/or care relative to others?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, what did you expect, it came from the evil
> south!
>
As do your messages, it just occured to me. :)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! G
FFL Guidelines # 1
This group has long maintained a thoughtful and considerate tone.
Please refrain from personal attacks, insults and excessive venting.
"Speak the truth that is sweet" is a worthy aspiration. If angry, take
some time to gain composure before writing or pushing the send button.
Pl
FFL Guidelines # 1
This group has long maintained a thoughtful and considerate tone.
Please refrain from personal attacks, insults and excessive venting.
"Speak the truth that is sweet" is a worthy aspiration. If angry, take
some time to gain composure before writing or pushing the send button.
Pl
>
> -- Forwarded Message
> From: Dana Sawyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The
> "Shankaracaryas" loom large in the imaginations and esteem of TMers
in our country but, for better and worse, they are no big deal at all.
India works on a guru system; when a person gains a reputation for
enlightenment (a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Yes, I have similar thoughts. Some slice of advertising does
> > objectify women, and increasingly men. As
Nice post. Thanks for the feedback and insights. Comments below.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akasha, I'm with you on this.
>
> I'm not going to try to address your points or bounce
> off of them, because 1) it's late here, and 2) I'm a
> compuls
I am tired of the attack wars. I assume you are too. We have some good
guidelines. Lets try to cultivate a culture that naturally lives them.
One way, perhaps, is to simply express your dismay at any post that
makes personal attacks, insults, excessive venting, is not respectful
to other viewpoint
We all need to start taking these to heart.
#) This group has long maintained a thoughtful and considerate tone.
Please refrain from personal attacks, insults and excessive venting.
"Speak the truth that is sweet" is a worthy aspiration. If angry, take
some time to gain composure before writing o
Please stop and desist all disparaging remarks about anybody on the
list. Please, no name calling, no imputing motives (sinister, or
otherwise), no snide remarks, no slurs, no jokes at others expense.
You are better than that.
This is a great list. But currently, it is getting bogged down in
crap
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...]
> > Its awesome to watch.
>
> What is awesome to watch is how everyone jumps into the fray with
&g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I believe it is unproductive to make personal attacks
> But only when *I* do it, apparently.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't see psychobabble. Can you be more specific?
> "Objectification," for one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I believe it is unproductive to make personal attacks
>
> But only when *I* do it, apparently.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
> > > --not to mention
> > > > that he lies and I don't--yet for some reason, I
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [akasha_108 wrote:]
> > in themselves. Specifically Judy -- I sense we may share some
> > commonality he
ucted me")
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/14/05 11:18 AM, "akasha_108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Judy must either like verbal abuse or feel it's the norm
> > of communication (maybe her Mom talked to the rest
> > of her family this way
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Who's t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Who's talking to whom here?
>
> Two women. Don't bother to figure it out,
> just objectify them. :-)
You haven't done so already (objectify
--- Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good morning Akasha:
No I was giving my overall impression merely based on my own life
experience. No I'm not a sociologist with a clipboard, nor was or am I
looking for endless argument, just discussion.
>
> Hi Akasha:
>
> Well not struggle. In ever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > "For the very first time in more than 36 years, audiences will get a
> > chance to experience the epochal performance by Jimi Hen
y-clad women
> than will *ever* be established as a result of visits
> to strip clubs.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Objectification of women and girls in our culture is pervasive
> > (Frederickson & Roberts, 1997)
lls his point of view - quite expensively, in fact. But
> that's what people with good insights (or bad ones) do. It's up to the
> reader to decide what makes sense and what doesn't.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Thanks. Interesting and well reasoned analysis. I don't at the moment
see any gaping holes. The author has written a book -- Americas Secret
war. Presumable on the same themes. It gets generally top reviews on
Amazon
He he head of Stratfor -- See below
While this is neither an accusation nor a cr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Patrick Gillam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Every aspect of this and related threads has
> > reminded me of the tenet in the Course in
> > Miracles that the relative ego feeds itself by
> > attacking others. Of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Objectification appears to stem, at least in part, from media
> sources.
> > This links to prio
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > To Women:
> >
> > You are attacking the wrong people if you are trying to separate
&g
401 - 500 of 1307 matches
Mail list logo
