Quotes from FFL Observers
[Commments and implied statements in brackets]
Believe me nobody ever died fighting for
our [their country's] freedom. Instead they fought to keep the rich
rich and the poor poor. They fought the wars as pawns for the rich.
The rich could give a damn about our freedom,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/12/06 10:15:53 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And it's ironic, too, how many of those who would send others to fight
in wars have never actually volunteered for one
Quotes from FFL Observers
[Commments and implied statements in brackets]
Believe me nobody ever died fighting for
our [their country's] freedom. Instead they fought to keep the rich
rich and the poor poor. They fought the wars as pawns for the rich.
The rich could give a damn about our freedom,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Country WWII deaths/100 population
--- --
That should be deaths per 1000 population, of course.
But
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In discussing this with Tom Traynor, he wrapped it up
perfectly:
Things happen exactly as they should. Why? Because that's the way they
happened.
Though meaningful perhaps via some other understandings or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
This is why I don't understand why some folks are so
thrown by the idea of determinism. If determinism
were true, it would make absolutely no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 20, 2006, at 12:57 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
In discussing this with Tom Traynor, he wrapped it up
perfectly
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
In discussing this with Tom Traynor, he wrapped
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/21/06 10:43 AM, nablus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And listening to mantras starting with OM is OK with you ?
I use a mantra with OM in it. Have been for several years. Material and
spiritual well-being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/21/06 7:03 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The WIE has details provided by him and his people. Where's the
independent
articles?
One of Amma¹s senior swamis told me that SSRS made a big show of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 6/20/06 7:09:23 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sparaig@
Per subject, are those the only two alternatives that occur to you?
Or is it a hidden yet profound lesson on the shallowness of strawmen
thinking?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All we is more techniques!
We know you are beyond need, Peter. But you can still speak the word
without taking you out of that state. :)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
See
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're going to learn them, it's better to learn them the right
way. In that way they can take a person to full Buddhahood rather
quickly.
Was that your experience?
If you didn't do it, why not? What else could
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 24, 2006, at 11:29 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
If you're going to learn them, it's better to learn them the right
way. In that way they can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 24, 2006, at 2:24 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 24, 2006, at 11:29 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
RELIGION
Beware the Yoga Demon! The Christian Right's fear of self-
realization
and spirituality
By Mel Seesholtz,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to have
more
millionaires than any billionaires. You would allow people to
accumulate
an estate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to have
more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
starting at incomes over $30-50,000, (even a negative income taxfor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
bastards
who care little about their fellow humanity. People like Bill Gates
are
a rare exception
Well 280 billion annually in american philanthropy sort
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
of contortions to obtain his $140 million retirement
package.
At some point in the accumulation of wealth,
Original posts
I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
of contortions to obtain his $140 million retirement
package.
At some point in the accumulation of wealth, money
ceases to be a medium of exchange and becomes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
When rich people talk about money, they're talking
about something entirely different from what poor and
middle-class people mean
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Judy never met a mass-murdering dictator she didn't like.
Bush? Nixon? Oh, you said dictators, not almost or hopeful
dictators. My mistake.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Few people are aware that any suggestion for the elimination of the
estate tax comes with the elimination of the stepped-up basis for
capital gains. Currently, all capital gains get stepped-up of
their cost basis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
From adjacent post:
[to Judy]
If you wish to start a new thread on The Massive Shortcomings of
New.Morning I could start it with at least several 100 points. But I
am biased. I am sure you cite 1000's of points, real or imagined. And
just let Unc get started. Perhaps you and others can start the
itelf.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Thanks card for posting the article on B12. For decades, as a
vegetarian (mostly -- with a 2-3 year trial exception of fish and
poultry ) and vegan at times, I have been aware of the need to
supplement ones diet with B12.
I did not know the low absorbsion rate of the almost universally used
form
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
snip
For Bush to say Saddam wouldn't let them in is simply a lie.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new.morning wrote:
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
I don't fancy myself anything. I don't take some platform and adopt
it. I think through each issue and decide on the merits. My views
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation
Re: The Massive Shortcomings of New.Morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
From adjacent post:
[to Judy]
If you wish to start a new thread on The Massive
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new.morning wrote:
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
I don't fancy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like many TM'ers back in the late 1970's I gave up on being a
vegetarian. I had too many bouts with hypoglycemia, anemia and vata
derangements. Using supplements will not often deal with the pH
imbalance that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Of course all others are cordially welcomed to chime in. Unc, Tom,
Jim, Peter all have good, perhaps at times entertaining, insights
We were sitting in a Manhattan living room on a spring afternoon, and
Warren Buffett had a Cherry Coke in his hand as usual. But this
unremarkable scene was about to take a surprising turn.
Brace yourself, Buffett warned with a grin. He then described a
momentous change in his thinking. Within
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a good test would be to take an Indian who comes from a long
line of vegetarians and pair him with a westerner who claims they
function well as a vegetarian and see who actually performs better in a
battery of
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no side effect to CC: its just the brain
better maintaining the global connectivity
of Pure Consciousness along with the normal
activation of various states whether major
states like waking, dreaming and sleeping, or
localized activiations like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
Totally fascinating article (long) in the New York Times magazine. A
few excerpts:
My Pain, My Brain
...
The area of the brain that the scanner focuses
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
Perhaps variations and imperfections of the [INTERPRETATION of the]
experience of IT, consciousness being alive within itself explains
some of the logical discrpency. IT certainly feels like IT is
self-sufficient as if it has
My points, interspersed are not meant as argumentative. But they seek
to put in fuller light some delicious contradictions still remaining.
Which may be real, or artifacts of language or loopy logic.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The shift from a bound self to a
non-localized Self is pure acausal grace that can not
be enacted from the side of the bound mind.
And if the shift occurs, and there is something acausal, then what
does the acausal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And contradiction is bad exactly why?
In my view, there is a vast realm where logic is of great value, and
where contradictions are indicative of an error. And there are other
realms which are outside the realm of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis Tom T;
This thing called Enlightenment or Awakening is the ultimate paradox.
It can be lived but anything and everything one can say about IT can
also be both true and untrue at the same time as it can not acurately
be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Tom T:
An analogy is to think about sitting in front of a 10 million
candlewatt strobe light with the eyes closed and wearing an eye mask.
THe effect of all that light will leave an imprint on the physiology
even if
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a Miss Boom-Boom LaVerne here for you,
Ah, another Bob Cummings fan.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I honestly think that what you're *hoping
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I honestly think that what you're *hoping
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I honestly think that what you're *hoping
the opposite, that it *can't*
be understood or described by the rational mind.
--- new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
See my adjacent posts. You will find your hypothesis is quite
one-dimensional and off base. I honestly think you may be
projecting here, projecting onto others an issue you
, to my attention. I vow to try to refrain
from such in the future. Please feel free to bring any lapses of such
to my attention.
Thank you for your kind attention.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
However eventually this was supplanted with the idea that
consciousness *was* the unified field--and thus the infamous
Hagelin article where he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
However eventually this was supplanted with the idea that
consciousness *was* the unified field--and thus the infamous
Hagelin article where he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 21, 2006, at 4:12 AM, sparaig wrote:
Domash, IIRC, ... but
he didn't buy into MMY's ideas about Quantum Mechanics.
That sounds quite
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 21, 2006, at 6:20 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
But in what I observed, he hardly came to MIU in the first place
because his expert view was that consciousness *was* the unified
field. Thats a rewriting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I could never tell where the line was with MMY: was this all
just an analogy or was it describing the reality?
It's not an anology for MMY or Hagelin either. Perhaps it was for
Domash. Maybe that's
what I had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 21, 2006, at 6:20 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
But in what I observed, he hardly came to MIU in the first place
because his expert
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ashelkent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
That's the normal way it works, anyway. If the
book is being self-published, the schedule could
be shorter depending on how much of the work the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 5/23/06 11:20 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and
he was
saying that any thought is a
Since last night 11pm or so PST, there have been 25 posts. 15 of them
stem from Shemp deciding now was a good time to revisit his views of
what Judy posted in January.
If that one post were kept at the poster's thought level, the ensuing
low value (IMO) 14 posts would have not been posted. If
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since last night 11pm or so PST, there have been 25 posts. 15 of them
stem from Shemp deciding now was a good time to revisit his views of
what Judy posted in January.
If that one post were kept
we assume are given, true a priori.
A more specific response to your points later.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 5/24/06 12:29 AM, new_morning_blank_slate at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there already a silent presumption that Tolle
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Since last night 11pm or so PST, there have been 25 posts. 15 of
them
stem from Shemp deciding now was a good time to revisit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Is being driven by and apparently obsessed with the past a sign of
something good? Makes one wonder about the effectiveness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[It is useful to be] constantly being open to new data and new
concepts. For
example, maybe we often skip a poster which our theory predicts will
waste our time. BUT, my point of the orignal post
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
[It is useful to be] constantly being open
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
[It is useful to be] constantly being open to new
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
In a way, it's like that bar where the regulars had
heard all the jokes so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree there's a severe limit to the progress that can be made with
talk therapy that focuses on intellectual analysis of past hurts. But
the fact remains that you can't transcend your way out of deep
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree there's a severe limit to the progress that can be made with
talk therapy that focuses on intellectual analysis of past hurts. But
the fact remains that you can't transcend your way out of deep
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
have several friends who Awakened recently, and they say that soon
thereafter, the shit hit the fan. They began feeling guilt and other
emotions that needed dealing with a thousand times more intensely than
before
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
have several friends who Awakened recently, and they say that soon
thereafter, the shit hit the fan. They began feeling guilt and other
emotions that needed dealing with a thousand times more intensely than
before
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whyich brings us back to the question which these countries are.
Anyonre knows?
The Good Ones, obviously. :)
Someone posted a list a while back. I think Netherlands, most of
Scandanavia, Germany, some newer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Self in each of us recognizes the Self in another. We are
conscious of this to one degree or another, whether our Self has
been fully awakened to us, or not.
This is how someone somewhat Awake will recognize
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 5/24/06 2:02 PM, new_morning_blank_slate
Asking the same question that you asked Vaj, why do you make
unprovable assumption that these people are Awakened?
'cause I have more to go on than he did. I've
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 5/24/06 2:02 PM, new_morning_blank_slate at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or that the
label Awakening has much of a common
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 5/24/06 3:04 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With all respect, I think you have missed the point of what I have
written.
Perhaps. I am certainly open to any corrections.
But perhaps you have missed my point. You have an experience /
knowlwedge that you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Or that the
label Awakening has much of a common connotation to many -
and thus elucidates more than it obscures
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With all respect, the bedrock of my Awakening serves as the
foundation for that which I write. Accept it or not, makes no
difference to me.
And why would I, or anyone, accept your truth or your awakening.
simply
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No, his term was Self Actualization. Most people on this forum share a
common definition of Self Realization.
Which is?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 24, 2006, at 4:21 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
I ask you both, with no rancor, do you believe that
the higher states of consciousness can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
And in your worldview, what do you call the state where all
illusions
have been dissolved?
'the state where all illusions have been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
And in your worldview, what do you call the state where all
illusions
have been dissolved?
'the state where all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
So shit is rejection. OK Rev. Jim.
Fuck you.
So I assume ideal social behavior and no anger (from the MMY
18
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
I have asked because some/many would not associate illusions with
awakening. They describe the state of illusion with terms
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
As I said before, whether you
accept it or not makes no difference to me.
I rarely accept unprovable assertions
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
holding any belief as valid or true would be a
filter or impostion on what is. Any belief we could hold would then
keep us from real integrity. And the riches that can flow freely are
not just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
If one is using E. or similar terms, but meaning a
state with different attributes than the MMY 18, its honest
and an act
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo
