>
> --
>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:59:46 -0700
> I'll be running a session on IRC to help anyone build GIMP
> on Linux,
> as part of the OpenHatch "Build it" project.
>
> The session will take place on #gimp on irc.gimp.org
Hy Oleg seems impossible to download the files you upload to Deposit Files
I just gey a message in Russian that, if my automatic translation was correct
say
"all the slot for your contry are busy try later",but try later don't help it
seems that site having serious bandwitch issues
Maybe you may
>On all our platforms? I doubt there's Xpdf or Evince for Macintosh and
>Windows platforms...
For Windows there are tons of free PDF viewers
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/ma
yahvuu
I'm sure you are not a average user that may need a hint to discover the very
useful options buried in the Gimp preference
But ,in case you will be forced to kill a single message , only visible once
after a new install
while 99% of users, may be forced to ask advice somewhere, or sug
>
> > I would hate to see it buried in the preferences.
>
> Me too
>
> / Martin
Un-bury the preferences can't be a practicable idea ?
As example the first time gimp is loaded a Prompt advising of their existence
, utility and Menu location?
I know well that you hate popping out message
will be alaways many complains if some of the mode included in photoshop
http://www.freetimefoto.com/photoshop_blending_mode would be missed in gimp.
with some reasons that make harder exchange of tip, tricks and files between
people doing similar jobs (or sharing same hobby) but using differ
Maybe you miss a step,after installed all the dependency you have to reinstall
gimp using the custom option of the installer (or something equivalent if you
compile )
I packed together time ago everything needed
http://photocomix-resources.deviantart.com/art/Gimp-Python-support-easier-7488901
> Without reading the
> exact
> description, you would have no idea whether it works on an
> image, a
> layer, whether ir creates something new, etc.
>It is unclear from
> the name
> whether it works on an active layer, or whether it creates
> a new
> image/layer.
would not make sense for all plu
> While maybe 5 seconds might be a little quick, conceptually I agree that
>> it should not last very long.
Please consider then, in particolar on Windows OS messages are often hidden
behind the image windows.
So a 5, 10, 0r even 15 second message will likely never be seen, and user will
simply
> >Is too difficult browsing brushes notice that
> there are 4 quite different types of of brushes mixed
> The brushes are clearly marked: notice the red and blue
> triangles in
> the bottom-right corners brush
> thumbnails? Red triangles indicate
> image tubes or "animated" brushes. Blue t
> As default for clone tool i see a HARD circle brush at
> 100% opacity,
.
> That's the default brush for everything I think.
Exact ! Are exactly the same !!
this demonstrate beyond doubts that current defaults are wrong.
Should be obvious that the pen tool , t
1) i agree with Alexia , get rid of all duplicates as the "circle soft" and
"circle hard" brush. If may be scaled only 1 is needed
2) most flexible brushes are that created with the brush editor that can be not
only resized but tilted, rotated,made harder or softer on the fly, even with
key
there is not text is your message, if was a link that was stripped away
There is now a new version of GAP available ?
> From: "wolfgang hofer"
> Subject: [Gimp-developer] gimp-gap 2.6 ahead
> To:
> Message-ID:
>
> <20090526125748.hm....@wolfgang.hofer.mail-wwl12.bo3.lycos.com
> How does this differ from the current "anti erase" tool
> option
> (quickly enabled also by holding Alt key)?
Maybe does not differ
BUT there is a Problem
there is not any documentation in the help on a "anti-erase" option or tool so
i believe almost only who contribute to implement it
May be very useful for who does photo-montages a option to "resurrect" erased
or "cleared pixels, to correct badly cropped details that often are noticed
only to late for a UNDO
May sound something magic but is trivial to implement, and since is not based
on UNDO may be applied also on alread
Will be not possible as option something as CTRL+Click+V (click should be done
inside the image )
Paste is centered to the point in the image where the click was done ?
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
http
Logic may be even changed, but before change something is better understand how
it works
Paste is centered at the center of the selection (if any)
Is not simple and intuitive create, or move, the selection where you want your
object be paste ?
How i would able to guess a relation with the pos
> From: ?yvind Kol?s
> GEGL already has too many blending modes (36) to be
> meaningfully
> presented to most users. I guess it would make sense to
> trim down the
> existing set, and perhaps offer the more arcane modes (both
> existing
> GIMP ones and arcane ones from other software, in an
>
>
> Spontaneously I don't think custom layer modes is a good
> idea. Might be
> fun for programmers to play with, but graphic
> professionals?
>
> HTH,
> Martin
Actually Graphic professional do complain ,but for missed option:
for the absence in Gimp of modes they learned to use in Photoshop
Thank for clearing
I also searched the bugzilla report for overlay mode but i could not find it
anymore
But instead i find a interesting proposal of Jao O Buono that, i believe
risk to be forgotten because posted in a no so strictly related topic
(here http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?
I hoped that with the passage to GEGL the old bugs in the Mreging mode were
fixed
(i refer here to OVERLAY, that in gimp is NOT overlay but a misnamed clone of
Soft Light, and to Color that do not seems work properly )
But i didn't see any news in the release notes, or in the Bugzilla reports
I found the algorithms of many merging mode
BUT all the the formula there do not take opacity into account so as now the
blending may be done only at 100% opacity
(btw is for a "blending filter" , that allow to merge also in mode not
available in Gimp
obviously the result, the output is the
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 18:27 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
>
> first, "Copy visible as new image" could easily turn
> out too smart,
> but since the bottom Background layer prefers to be
> one without alpha,
The first basic assumption is wrong...so maybe what build on that need
reconsiderat
>I understand better.
>"What is visible" is really a flattenned stack of the visible layers
>(with an eye in the Layer dialog).
Not exactly flattened but merged
Flatten will a remove the alpha channel, replacing any transparent area
with the background color
>The question is the interest of thi
>
> I stopped reading here. Please describe your level of
> knowledge in Script-Fu before you do continue in this
> thread.
Maybe what has to be described is the concept of "same", maybe you give to the
word "same" a sense to me a bit peculiar but technically much more correct then
mine
Usi
> From: "Michael Schumacher"
> Just to make sure: does everyone know that it is the same
> script that does register both menu entries?
> Michael
Not exactly the same script
Same".scm" file for Logo-related script contains 2 script
A.. hem ex_Toolbar script that is available now from File /cre
Sven Neumann
> If you actually look at the code, you will notice that
> these are the
> same scripts registering in two locations. There is no
> artificial
> distinction being made here. This is fully intentional.
i look to the code i notice 2 different scripts with same name the fact that
b
> From: Martin Nordholts
> I agree with basically all your points but to be honest I
> can't see why
> anyone would want to use those scripts at all.
Many young download and start using GIMP to make sigs for forum
So their first contact with GIMP include that scripts
As they are they may give a
"David Gowers" <00a...@gmail.com>
wrote
>I want to make this clear: In English language 'create a new imagine'
>is nonsense. imagine is a verb, as in 'I imagine I am eating a juicy
>watermelon'; it's an action, not a thing.
>'image' is the noun, you can 'create a new image' or 'modify the active
"David Gowers" <00a...@gmail.com>
wrote
>I want to make this clear: In English language 'create a new imagine'
>is nonsense. imagine is a verb, as in 'I imagine I am eating a juicy
>watermelon'; it's an action, not a thing.
>'image' is the noun, you can 'create a new image' or 'modify the active
I believe there are some "artificial" limitation to the potential of script fu,
derived by the exigence to "categorize " the scripts in 2 main categories:
"Previous toolbox-scripts" that create a new imagine
"imagine script" that should modify the active imagine
I suppose that division had some
> grouping. The new groups are:
>
> * Different alpha compositing methods
> * Modes that always gives a brighter result
> * Modes that always give a darker result
> * Overlay-like modes
> * Modes that can give completely different colors
> * Modes based on HSV/HSL.
there are 2 more generic catego
Hy i just try the plugin on windows XP
jpg2000 has subcategories
at least my viewers,Xnview display 2 options
to save as jpg2000.
1 JPG2-LuraWawe-JPEG-2000-Format
and
2 JG2-JPEG-2000-JPG2-File-Format
The plugin open successfully preview and the file ONLY for type 1 "LuraWawe"
Type 2 dispay n
P.S about how i save png i never use the option "ignore"
Scopri il blog di Yahoo! Mail:
Trucchi, novità e scrivi la tua opinione.
http://www.ymailblogit.com/blog
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.
Sven Neumann
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Proposed usabillity
> enhancement for PNG
> That's not true. The current background color is used.
> So if you want
> the background to be white, then you should set your
> background color to
> white.
No. maybe "should" but does not for me
My backgro
Sven Neumann
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Proposed usabillity
> enhancement for PNG
> That's not true. The current background color is used.
> So if you want
> the background to be white, then you should set your
> background color to
> white.
No. maybe "should" but does not for me
My back
i believe there is another thing that may correct in how Gimp save PNG and its
about transparency
When a PNG created with gimp is converted in JPG or any other format that do
not support trnsparency transparent area become black, while they should be
white
that happens if the conversion is do
Fl?vio Pontes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote
is not a good
> indicator for
> a drop target. Not one of the ppl I showed it - all of them
> designers -
> recognized it as a drop target and, frankly, the image in
> there is
> simply wrong. If we need to make it recognizable as a drop
> target, we
> need
Excuse the double post in the first the subject went somehow lost and the rest
reformatted in a weird way with question marks filling blank spaces
--
May be that this long discussion suffers a lack of communicatio
May be that this long discussion suffers a lack of communication?
2 languages were used both like English but one is the English of the
developers the other that of artists/users...similar words are used but seem
used with quite different meanings
to summarize "use transparency as a colors
i believe very hard to find a good reason to switch off visibility of a layer
in order to edit it,
For that other sw lock invisible layers in order to avoid them edited by mistake
i do not think a similar lock will be good in gimp ,this for several reasons
,(one is that i suppose such lock ma
>In my opinion, a better solution to the "copy visible to new layer"
>functionality would be to add an option to Merge Visible Layers which
>would retain the original visible layers. This approach would seem
>more intuitive and would not entail an additional menu command. It
>would also be more
i know that many good scripts are not included to preserve the Gimp code
essential and easy to maintain..a excellent reason .
But in this case the script fill a basic missed feature often required by many
users
The feature in Photoshop is called "apply imagine" APPARENTLY in gimp that may
x27;t be used to correct saving's errors
Alchemie Foto\grafiche
-
Scopri il Blog di Yahoo! Mail: trucchi, novità, consigli... e la tua opinione!___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.X
p till now was clearly described ,BUT this "
"#you have to change the generated code manually.
# (check for calls to "gimp_set_data" or "gimp_get_data" that are using
# the plugins name as key argument within the plugin's sourcecode."
is a bit too sintetic
is necessary to sort out how to access this
> functionality in a discoverable way.
I suffer from the same problem from time to time. I'd love to see an option to
"lock" the windows. I have a setup that works for me and that I don't change,
and it'd be good to be abl
; option just run with the
default values not with last used)
but i will like try with "liquid resize" that is another plugin i wish to use
in animation
Alchemie Foto\grafiche
-
Scopri il Blog d
lity in a close
future?
PS
i even try with others to solve in the other way around adding animation option
to that MM codes, but that fails ,no one of the tenctative was fully sucessful
Alchemie Foto\grafiche
-
Scopri il Blog di Yahoo! Mail: tr
pt fu ?
Alchemie Foto\grafiche
-
Scopri il Blog di Yahoo! Mail: trucchi, novità, consigli... e la tua opinione!___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/ma
criticize but hoping to contribute at least with my
users experience and the feedback i get daily from other users,often at their
first experiences with gimp
Alchemie Foto\grafiche
-
Scopri il Blog di Yahoo! Mail: trucchi, novità, consigli... e
>I do not think gimp needs to come with extra stuff by default. There is
> more
> than enough already.
well there are more then enough complex and seldom used features..
but then some basic simple basic features are missed
2 examples of missed function available with extra script
different then
"normal""
The other objections, i think not so relevant and meaningful as that 2 were
possible problem if using "soft" brushes
possible issues with less then 100% opacity for brush strokes
Alchemie Foto\grafiche
-
if something as that will be
done:
Users will think that the slider effect may is also rendered in the saved image
More if they will forget to reset the slider, they will be easy misleaded.by a
effect that is visible, but will be never rendered, (if not by a screenshoot)
Al
ame if i die suddenly or i go bankrupt and so i cannot maintain my promise, i
will be the responsible , not gimp staff .
Just similar reward should be NOT mixed with the Gimp donation
Alchemie Foto\grafiche
-
-
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:28:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Alchemie foto\\grafiche"
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Gap documentation
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/lis
apply contanst" or "apply varying" ).
A last question: i suppose this is possible also for third part plugins , and
not only with those bundled with gimp...is my guess correct?
Alchemie Foto\grafiche
-
-
L'
56 matches
Mail list logo
