Re: Review Board Ticket #4932: Error creating a review request with a SVN repository

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4932/ -- New update by dkmorgan For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4932

Review Board Ticket #4932: Error creating a review request with a SVN repository

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4932/ -- New ticket #4932 by dkmorgan For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New

Re: Review Board Ticket #4847: Pressing enter on upload file dialog cancels it instead of uploading - maddening

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4847/ -- New update by brokenalarms For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4847

Review Board Ticket #4847: Pressing enter on upload file dialog cancels it instead of uploading - maddening

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4847/ -- New ticket #4847 by brokenalarms For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status:

Re: Review Board 3.0.14 is out

ot happy already, having realized once more what an amount of time you pour into this!) So thank you once more and now i am back in lurkmode :) Am Dienstag, 20. August 2019 17:03:42 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Gallagher: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:00 AM Daniel > wrote: > > > >

Re: Review Board 3.0.14 is out

. I would be very happy if you would maybe find the time to describe the way (if there is any) in that i might be able to install a "more modern than 2.5.17"-version of RB into a RHEL7 system without manually installing too many dependencies. TIA and cheers Daniel > -- Supercharg

Review Board Ticket #4815: Diff is not displayed after uploading a diff file

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4815/ -- New ticket #4815 by dviorreta For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New

Re: Reviewboard 3.0 RPM availability

Thank you for all your efforts and also that you try to keep on! You have my sympathy and understanding for not mentioning anything about something concerning the concept of a timeframe! Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2018 19:23:09 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Gallagher: > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:18

Re: Reviewboard 3.0 RPM availability

ot comprehend ... after that unsuccessful attempt i had the machine get reverted to previous "untouched" state and afterwards installed the rpm for 2.5.17 ... and now, like stated, i am thumbing my nose at all those nice stuff that is coming in with the 3.x releases :o) cheers Daniel A

jQuery 1.8 vulnerability

Hello, My corp security department prevents me using the ReviewBoard because there are publicly known vulnerabilities in the one of RB's components (particularly jQuery 1.8). Would it possible for the community to mitigate those issues ? CVE-2015-9251

Re: Issue installing reviewbot-worker on latest RB

I have done all that already, with same results:-( On Fri, 16 Mar. 2018, 11:37 am David Trowbridge, wrote: > As I suggested, disable and enable the extension while keeping an eye on > the log files. And double check the permissions on the directory to verify > that the web

Re: rb-extension-pack Compability with Review Board 3.0

Christian, Thank you for the reply. I will wait for the patch to be applied and check again. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know!

Re: rb-extension-pack Compability with Review Board 3.0

David, Thank you for the reply. I will check again once the Extensions get updated. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know!

rb-extension-pack Compability with Review Board 3.0

Are there any plans to check the compatibility for the Extensions contained in rb-extension-pack with Review Board 3.0? I am using a few of the Extensions there and have encountered errors using Review Board 3.0 RC1. For example, when configuring the message for the "Message of the Day"

Re: Error opening existing review after upgrading to Review Board 3.0 RC1

Thank you for the prompt reply. Yes, you were spot on. I didn't copy the SECRET_KEY from the production server over to the test server. Once I did, the errors stopped occurring. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review

Error opening existing review after upgrading to Review Board 3.0 RC1

I just completed upgrading Review Board 2.5.16 to 3.0 RC1 on a test server. Logged in without any issues and tried opening an existing review which resulted in a "Something broke! (Error 500)". The log output is as follows (sensitive details edited): None - user1 - /r/605/ -

Re: cipher AES in CFB8 mode is not supported by this backend

Fixed it ... cryptography==2.0 needed to be upgraded to cryptography==2.0.3. WHEW that was stressful! On Monday, August 28, 2017 at 12:55:39 PM UTC-5, Daniel Kuecker wrote: > > I'm having an issue updating the user and passowrd for one of our > repositories via the admin page. Whe

Re: cipher AES in CFB8 mode is not supported by this backend

==1.1.4 On Monday, August 28, 2017 at 12:55:39 PM UTC-5, Daniel Kuecker wrote: > > I'm having an issue updating the user and passowrd for one of our > repositories via the admin page. When I enter the info and hit save, I get > the following error: > > 2017-08-28 17:49:57,

cipher AES in CFB8 mode is not supported by this backend

I'm having an issue updating the user and passowrd for one of our repositories via the admin page. When I enter the info and hit save, I get the following error: 2017-08-28 17:49:57,696 - ERROR - None - 888 - /admin/db/scmtools/repository/1/ - djblets.log.middleware - Exception thrown

Re: Review Board Ticket #4533: Interdiffs are not working on some files

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4533/ -- New update by besperon For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4533

Re: Error: too many trys to get lock

Thanks for the quick reply Christian! I see apache did not have write access to the data folder. I enabled it and will watch for future errors. Thanks! --DK On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Christian Hammond <christ...@beanbaginc.com > wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I haven't, but

Error: too many trys to get lock

I'm getting this error on our production RB server. We are using P4 with LDAP authentication. SCMError: [P4#run] Errors during command execution( "p4 login" ) [Error]: "Fatal client error; disconnecting!\nOperation 'client-SetPassword' failed.\nToo many trys to get lock

Repository type is empty for GitHub Enterprise

I did the default installation (on windows with bitnami distribution) and I'm trying to add a GitHub enterprise repository buy the Repository Type comboBox is empty. Could be an installation error? Regards, Pablo. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:

Re: update_index always indexes the users class

thout a patch to Review Board (the proper Elasticsearch support has only >> been thoroughly tested in 3.0). How comfortable do you feel applying >> patches? >> >> Christian >> >> >> -- >> Christian Hammond >> President/CEO of Beanbag <https

Re: update_index always indexes the users class

Thanks for the quick reply Christian! I would like the info on configuring Elasticsearch if you don't mind. --DK On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 3:12:06 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > I believe this happens because unlike review requests, we have no way of &

update_index always indexes the users class

I have a fresh 2.5.9 install with a db taken from a backup of another 2.5.9 install (basically a backup of my production instance). On the production instance, I am experiencing 100% cpu usage every time the update_index cron job runs causing my users to complain about responsiveness of the

Review Board Ticket #4541: Going from < 300 character summary field content to 300 character content produces clipping in the "Review request changed" diff.

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4541/ -- New ticket #4541 by dkuecker For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New

Re: Review Board Ticket #4398: Make date of review / change description / status an anchor link to that item

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4398/ -- New update by mconley For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4398

diffviewer_filediffdata table after 1.7.27 to 2.5.9 upgrade

I recently moved our RB 1.7.27 instance to a 2.5.9 instance. I restored a backup of the 1.7.27 db to the 2.5.9 instance and ran rb-site install and waited and waited. Everything converted successfully and we are now running 2.5.9 (our users love it! yay!) NOTE: Before the restore, to avoid

Re: Review Board Ticket #4479: I sometimes want to view only one side of the diff. I find larger fonts more readable, but run out of screen width when viewing both sides of the diff.

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4479/ -- New update by daniel For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4479

Review Board Ticket #4479: I sometimes want to view only one side of the diff. I find larger fonts more readable, but run out of screen width when viewing both sides of the diff.

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4479/ -- New ticket #4479 by daniel For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status:

How big is your Review Board site?

With Review Board's recent 10th anniversary, I thought it would be interesting to compare the size of everyone's Review Board site. We are sitting at 125,000 reviews, 2032 users and a 26GB database size on disk. What's yours at? -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

YES! Thats a wonderful idea (the single shared install)! Thanks for the idea! I think it will work for us! --Daniel On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Christian Hammond <christ...@beanbaginc.com > wrote: > Sorry, I don't have any pointers here. Tools like py2exe drastically > cha

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

script we run and is called from other build-related scripts. I only really need post and patch functionality and we hard-code the RB url. Thanks for the response!!! --Daniel On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Christian Hammond < christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote: > Out of curiosity, wh

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

Any pointers? On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:54 PM, john levin <smart.le...@gmail.com> wrote: > I did.. and i was successful.. > > On Sep 23, 2016 12:30 AM, "Daniel Kuecker" <dan...@kuecker.net> wrote: > >> Has anyone been successful building RBTools 0.7.6 in

Re: rbt patch "file not found"

- > Christian Hammond > President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> > Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Daniel Kuecker <dan...@kuecker.net> > wrote: > >> Oops, forgot to mention I

Re: How to access the review board site from other system via browser?

Are you getting an error? Did you copy your apache-wsgi.conf to /etc/httpd/conf.d/? If you did that, you might need to enable httpd port passthru in the firewall. On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 9:19:22 AM UTC-5, P P Gobind Chandra Praharaj wrote: > > I have set-up all prerequisites and

Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

l. Thanks in advance! --Daniel -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message b

Re: rbt patch "file not found"

Oops, forgot to mention I am running this on Windows 10. RBTools: 0.7.6 RB: tried on versions 1.7.27 and 2.5.6.1 On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 8:50:04 AM UTC-5, Daniel Kuecker wrote: > > Running "rbt patch " command results in a file not found error > for every file

rbt patch "file not found"

Running "rbt patch " command results in a file not found error for every file in the request. I verified the files are synced to my local drive. Any ideas? Command line info (path info removed for anonymity): C:\P4>rbt patch 127325 Patch is being applied from request 127325 with diff

Re: rbt patch on Windows troubles

temporary patch file with proper line endings? FWIW: I ran this from a linux machine and it works fine. Thanks! --Daniel On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 at 3:07:23 PM UTC-5, Igor Berger wrote: > > Hello, > > This is not a Review Board problem. I'm just wondering whether anyone is > using &quo

Re: Review Board Ticket #3987: Allow collapsing/hiding files in diff viewer

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/3987/ -- New update by tyralek For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #3987

Re: RBTools Ticket #4061: rbt.exe failing to find diff on Windows 10

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4061/ -- New update by bittebrown For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #4061 Reply:

Re: Reviewboard upgrade failure

All, I am trying to upgrade from 2.0.20 -> 2.5.3. I do this by taking a backup of the 2.0.20 database then importing into MySQL and then running the rb-site upgrade. However I get the following output: Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and

Re: Reviewboard upgrade failure

I too had this issue (MySQL default changing from MyISAM to InnoDB). Although I understand that this is caused by MySQL version being updated at the same time as a Reviewboard Update (and migrate). But would there be any way for the 'upgrade' logic of Reviewboard to post a more useful error

Depends-On, Blocks and Circular Reference

WE are running 2.0.17 and have managed to create a situation and dont know how to resolve it - or whether its a defect Someone created 2 reviews with code changes that were dependent. They marked Review 2 as Depends On Review 1 - this then updated the 'Blocks' field. They then marked Review 1

Re: Problems upgrading to 2.0.13 and 2.0.15

That fixed it. Many Thanks! On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 2:05:03 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Daniel, Sorry, I've been pretty swamped. First, make a backup of your database. Then, try: DELETE FROM django_project_version WHERE id=4; Then perform the upgrade again

Re: Problems upgrading to 2.0.13 and 2.0.15

Any update here? On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 1:29:07 PM UTC-7, Daniel Dominguez wrote: Running --hint --evolve had not been done before. It was just my experimenting after seeing this issue (with a current backup of the db first of course). Anyhow, I've attached the sql dump you

Re: RBtools 0.7 - issue posting a review

, 15 February 2015 21:20:00 UTC, Daniel Laird wrote: After some investigation we found the following: # TODO: This can break on systems that don't have the en_US local # installed (which isn't very many). Ideally in this case, we could # put something in the config file, but that's not plumbed

Re: Review Board version mismatch

I used easy_install. On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 10:45:53 AM UTC-6, Daniel Bansch wrote: I'm trying to install review board on redhat with apache, mod_wsgi and mysql. I get this error when I go to my review board site

Re: Review Board version mismatch

I was able to get it to run by changing the directory name of ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg to ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg. On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 10:45:53 AM UTC-6, Daniel Bansch wrote: I'm trying to install review board on redhat with apache, mod_wsgi and mysql. I get

Review Board version mismatch

/mysite and restarted everything, but the same error pops up. I have ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg and ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg in my python site-packages directory. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Daniel -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https

Re: RBtools 0.7 - issue posting a review

wrote: Hi Daniel, Do you think you could add some code to print out the contents of 'log' inside _convert_symbolic_revision before we try to construct the etree? Thanks, -David On Fri Jan 30 2015 at 4:48:37 AM Daniel Laird daniel@googlemail.com javascript: wrote: We have a shared

RBtools 0.7 - issue posting a review

We have a shared Debian server and we have updated RBtools to 0.7. When we try to post a review we get the following: SERVER_NAME rbt post -d NUM RBTools 0.7 Python 2.7.3 (default, Mar 13 2014, 11:03:55) [GCC 4.7.2] Running on Linux-3.2.0-4-amd64-x86_64-with-debian-7.8 Home =

Adding a hyperlink to the navbar

Hopefully this is a simple question with a simple answer as I am very new and unexperienced with the code for this web page. My company uses review board for code reviews and also has a company wiki page with the procedures used for code reviews. I would like to have a link to that wiki page

Email all users......

All, Before I try and write some python that queries all users (ideally active) and gets their email addresses. Has anyone else done this and would you be willing to share? I want to be able to announce things like RBtools 0.7 to all active users and cant think of another way (other than the

RBTools, SVN and a strange issue

I am using RBtools 0.6.3 and am trying to post a review to ReviewBoard. We use SVN as our version control system. We are not using the .reviewboardrc files but the reviewboard:url property as this means less files in the workspace. For most of our repos this works fine and rbt post creates a

Re: Reviewboard 1.7 - Reviewboard 2.0.x update

: Hi Daniel, We never intended the base directory to contain a URL. It sounds like the custom script is probably responsible for this. Can you confirm whether the base directory's URL exactly matches the configured URL for the repository? In the case that it does match, we take

Backup and Restore of Reviewboard 2.0 failing (mysqldump issues)

All, Since RB 1.5 I have backed up the RB installation everynight be by using mysqldump user=x password=y reviewboard backup.sql I have also backed up all attachments etc. I could then restore the data easily with another script. I used this method to upgrade from 1.7.25 - 2.0.11 and with the

Re: Reviewboard 1.7 - Reviewboard 2.0.x update

:' in it, though. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Daniel Laird daniel@googlemail.com javascript: wrote: To follow up the error

Reviewboard 1.7 - Reviewboard 2.0.x update

All, We were running Reviewboard 1.7.25 and people used a number of methods to create review requests: svn diff - manually upload post-review rbt I have just migrated us to Reviewboard 2.0.11 and seem to have hit an issue. Some of our reviews no longer display it suggests that a file cant be

Re: Reviewboard 1.7 - Reviewboard 2.0.x update

by SVN diff. Cheers Dan On Thursday, 18 December 2014 11:29:18 UTC, Daniel Laird wrote: All, We were running Reviewboard 1.7.25 and people used a number of methods to create review requests: svn diff - manually upload post-review rbt I have just migrated us to Reviewboard 2.0.11 and seem

Subversion not updating revisions

Hi, I have a new reviewboard installation (2.0.5), and we've setup a subversion repository. However, the repository is never synchronized with the server after it is first added. I can re-add the repo and am able to see the most recent revisions, but after that, the view into the repository

TeamForge and Reviewboard

All, My company have a TeamForge service running and are using GIT as the default SCM. I have a local Reviewboard server and would like to point it at the GIT repo - instead of using the default code review tool of gerrit I am using Reviewboard 1.7.25 currently The TeamForge project says that

Error using post-review and Reviewboard 1.7.25

All, We are currently using post-review and Reviewboard 1.7.25 (RBtools 0.5.1). We added a new Repo to Reviewboard and its listed as repository 26. However when we try to post a new review to Reviewboard we get: DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: http://server/svn/repo_name, Base path: /trunk,

Re: Renaming Repositories

That sorted it - thank you. Cheers Dan On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 21:49:26 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote: The fix itself is in djblets 1.7.26. If you upgrade to Review Board 1.7.25 you'll get the latest djblets along with it. -David On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Daniel Laird daniel

Renaming Repositories

All, I wish to change the name of a repository in Reviewboard (am using it in a RB extension). However when i change the field and enter the authentication details I just get a box that says 'Please correct the error below' However nothing in shown. I have check the logs and nothing is

Re: Renaming Repositories

We are running 0.7.9 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.9-py2.6.egg Cheers Dan On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 10:07:55 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote: Dan, What version of djblets is installed? -David On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Daniel Laird daniel

Re: Renaming Repositories

I am running 1.7.18 and having this problem. I could upgrade to 1.7.25 if you think that will fix it? Dan -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at

Re: Downgrading Reviewboard 2.0RC2 - 1.7.25

AM, Daniel Laird daniel@googlemail.comjavascript: wrote: All, Due to various issue my development server has to be re-purposed as the main server. This has meant I have to revert from 2.0RC2 - 1.7.25 (the latest stable version). At this point I usually import the database and media

Downgrading Reviewboard 2.0RC2 - 1.7.25

All, Due to various issue my development server has to be re-purposed as the main server. This has meant I have to revert from 2.0RC2 - 1.7.25 (the latest stable version). At this point I usually import the database and media files and all works ok. However I get the following: Traceback

Re: Using --revision-range with single revision in subversion

Perfect - thanks! I'll try to test when I have some free time. On Thursday, January 30, 2014 12:05:29 PM UTC-5, Daniel F wrote: I haven't been able to successfully use *rbt post --revision-range=SINGLE_REVISION*. It works fine if I use the syntax *rbt post --revision-range

Word-break making it difficult to read numbers of reviews in dashboard navbar

In the dashboard navbar, one of my users noticed that if a review group is sufficiently long and the group has =100 reviews, the UI wraps both the group name and the number of reviews. Wrapping the group name isn't too big a deal. However, wrapping the number of reviews makes it a bit hard to

Re: Change in LDAP authentication behavior in 1.7.14 breaks environments that don't allow anonymous searches

David, Sorry for the massive delay! I've finally posted it at https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/4953/. On Friday, October 18, 2013 1:51:59 AM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: Daniel, I'd suggest making a quick clone of the reviewboard repository, making your change, and then posting your

Re: Change in LDAP authentication behavior in 1.7.14 breaks environments that don't allow anonymous searches

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Daniel Kan danie...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: I am using RB 1.7.x with an LDAP authentication backend and it's been working fine up through 1.7.13. With 1.7.14, the authentication mechanism no longer works in my environment. After some digging, it appears

Change in LDAP authentication behavior in 1.7.14 breaks environments that don't allow anonymous searches

I am using RB 1.7.x with an LDAP authentication backend and it's been working fine up through 1.7.13. With 1.7.14, the authentication mechanism no longer works in my environment. After some digging, it appears that there was a change in reviewboard/accounts/backends.py to search anonymously

Error with home directory path expansion when using rbt?

New user to ReviewBoard here. Great tool with an intuitive interface, thanks for your efforts! Recently, one of my users was using 'rbt' from RBTools 0.5.1 and noticed that it would not accept '~' in the value for --diff-filename. My guess was that rbt does not run os.path.expanduser on the

How can I remove an extension?

I tried and failed to install the ascii art shipit extension. 2013-06-10 18:41:31,649 - ERROR - - Error loading extension shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension 2013-06-10 18:41:36,053 - ERROR - - Error loading extension shipit_ascii_art_extension: No

Re: How can I remove an extension?

- Extensions, find the ascii art extension, and disable it from there. It's not listed. According to that, there are no extensions registered On Jun 10, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Daniel Kelly arrays.tostr...@gmail.com wrote: I tried and failed to install the ascii art shipit extension. 2013-06

Re: How can I remove an extension?

No that's not it. I've rebooted this box ( a VM ) multiple times since the problem started happening. On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: On Jun 10, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Daniel Kelly arrays.tostr...@gmail.com wrote: Extensions should be disabled from

myisam or innodb ?

This is probably a Django issue, but if I'm using mysql, should my tables be in innodb format or myisam? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/

Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

. If it spins indefinitely, it may mean that you haven't logged in to Review Board, thus the authentication cookie isn't set. Currently, you *cannot* log in via the extension itself (I am working on that). - Kiro On Monday, 22 April 2013 08:56:14 UTC-7, Daniel Laird wrote: I have downloaded

Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

I have downloaded and installed it - I have then pointed it at my company server. But it just spins - with the busy icon. Does it require anonymous access or anything as it does not seem to be asking for username/password? Dan On Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:15:31 AM UTC+1, Kirollos Risk

rb-extension-pack - installation and usage?

I just found this pack of extensions and saw the XML Review Extension. However there is little explaining what this does or how it enhances the process of reviewing XML. Can anyone tell me what it adds? I thought I had installed it properly and then looked at a review with XML files and noted

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed. One question I have is about RBTools? I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools. Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same time? Also I understand there was a plan for a Python

SVN 1.7 support

Has anyone managed to patch or modify reviewboard so that diffs generated under SVN 1.7 actually work with post-review and ReviewBoard? The upgrade to SVN is about to hit my department and it will be a shame to stop reviewing code as a result of this change Dan -- Want to help the

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

, August 3, 2012 7:49:01 PM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Daniel, The CACHE_* warnings you get are harmless. Just new APIs in Django we have to migrate to. We can't detect the config file location. The user may be using our auto-generated ones, or they may have copied/pasted

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

I have tried to install this release. I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by specifying -f to easy_install. Onc done I then did rb-site upgrade /path/my/site This took a while and generated the following: Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.11 to 1.7 beta 1 There are

Post-Review and Non publically accessible repositories

I am using post-review to generate my diff requests and post them to my reviewboard instance. One of my SVN servers has restricted access, as such I mark it as non publically accessible and add all the Users /Groups that can access it. The problem is when I run post-review it fails to find the

rb-site help

Hi, I am going to use rb-site to dump the data and then import onto a new webserver. Whilst trying to check out the options I noticed that when I do rb-site -h there is no help regarding the manage options. I am going to check the source code - but is this intentional or just an oversight?

Phantom Review Closer

is closing them as there is no record of who closed them, and I can't find any evidence in the logs to show when something is closed and an indication to who did it. Any help will be much appreciated. Thanks, Daniel -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http

Can Connect SVN Repository thru proxy

Hi all, We're using Review Board 1.6.4.1. We access a Subversion server thru a proxy which is configured in / root/.subversion/servers. The 'svn info http://svn.foo.com:8080/repos/3845' command return a correct response. But when we try to create a new repository in reviewboard, the server kicks

Re: Problem uploading screenshots

Attached is the screenshot of the console you asked for. Thanks, Daniel https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-zI4uTyoe4ys/T6QParQvlfI/AFQ/jEq2pTO8Q1E/s1600/ScreenShot003.jpg On Thursday, April 26, 2012 2:48:54 PM UTC-6, Christian Hammond wrote: What version of Review Board? Can

Re: Password reset email said to come from example.com despite correct server name set in General Settings

Yep, that did it. Thanks. Daniel On Monday, March 26, 2012 11:56:45 PM UTC-6, brajesh wrote: Hi Daniel, You need to make changes under Database - Sites Thanks Brajesh On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Daniel wrote: One of my Review Board users attempted to reset his password. He got

Password reset email said to come from example.com despite correct server name set in General Settings

, Daniel -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

Paid Support

, that was with verbose turned on. Any and all help and offers are appreciated. Thanks, Daniel -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users

Trying to move from sqlite to mysql running into disk image is malformed problems

be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Daniel -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email

post-receive hook for Reviewboard?

, Daniel -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

Re: Bzr support in post-review

patches again. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Benamy dben...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Adding bzr support to post-review seems to be in limbo. There's

Re: Bzr support in post-review

://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Benamy dben...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Adding bzr support to post-review seems to be in limbo. There's a patch for it at http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1739/ and a thread about it at http

  1   2   >