Re: [biofuels-biz] Re: Revealed: Why Germans Oppose War in Iraq - French Fries - OT

2002-11-11 Thread James Slayden

I believe that CytoCulture out here in CA is using BD for remediation:

http://www.cytoculture.com/process.html

James

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, David Preskett wrote:

 Keith,
 I've just got to pick you over this:
 
 #There's an apparent misclassification of water pollution standards in
 Germany, where the risk from rapeseed oil is not even  classified,
 whereas
 biodiesel is a class 1 hazard, and fossil diesel  is in class 2 (worse).
 It
 only refers to water pollution and no other aspects of toxicity or
 hazard. #
 
 I like the German WGK system. It makes sure that people get clean water
 to
 drink without pollutants and they've got a good understanding of the
 importance of the relationship of forests and water. Biodiesel is a
 pretty
 serious pollutant (in water) as it biodegrades so rapidly by water
 organism
 which themselves strip the oxygen from the water (Biological Oxygen
 Demand or
 BOD) and kills everything else. Longer chained BD esters also require
 more
 oxygen to degrade than shorter chain diesel and have a high Chemical OD.
 Even
 household soaps, like greases also, have a very serious polluting effect
 and
 are also made from vegetable/animal oils.
 
 #This doesn't make sense, a biodiesel spill would be less of a problem
 than a
 spill of vegetable oil, which  coats everything, like fossil oil does.#
 
 In soils yes. All three would cause anaerobic conditions initially but
 dino
 diesel would remain undegraded for a long time. I could show you a site
 of a
 thirty year old diesel spill  here in North Wales where its still
 anaerobic
 and lifeless. On the other hand I purposely put BD in my compost heap to
 see
 what happened and after six months I had some pretty good mulch for my
 garden.
 
 #In fact biodiesel is used to clean up marine oil spills.#
 
 What a waste! So tell me, just which one of the oil companies
 clean
 up their oil spills at sea?  There are far better systems for oil
 recovery
 anyway though they're rarely used. I've heard of this before and I can't
 see
 the logic behind it - you end up with a solution of crude oil in esters.
 Now
 picking it up is the problem
 
 Dave
 
 --
 David Preskett, BSc (Hons.), AIWSc
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Reduce - reuse - recycle
 
 University of Wales
 BioComposites Centre
 Deiniol Road
 Bangor
 Gwynedd
 LL57 2UW
 http://www.bc.bangor.ac.uk
 Tel +44 (0)1248-370588
 Fax: +44 (0)1248-370594
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Hrmm, why can't we have this in the US??

2002-11-15 Thread James Slayden

Here is something interesting from Detroit!

GM's Opel brand brought a turbo diesel approach to fuel efficiency in an
aggressive sports car called the Eco-Speedster, which again features a
carbon-fiber body. The 112-hp two-seater concept car achieves 94 mpg and
can reach a top speed of 155 mph.

And we wonder why we can't have this back in the US?!  Then again. it is
only a concept car.  :(

Prolly is BD certified also 

Full link:

http://www.afdc.doe.gov/whatsnew.shtml


James S.




Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Large and Small, All on the Same Team-- Was Re: more info on the NBB and the soy subsidy

2002-11-18 Thread James Slayden

Sorry, I just had to responde to something you said about the DIY'rs
sullying the image of BD??!!

In this last weekends class we did a little homebrew test for quality
against commerce BD and a batch from the Berkley co-op and they were about
the same.  If anything, the commerce BD that gets sent for ASTM and EPA
testing is prolly from a VERY carefully processed batch, whereas most
homebrew is carefully processed with each batch out of necessity (more
lovingly ;-)  ).  I wouldn't say all homebrewers are that concerned with
their batches, but to be a DIY'r is in itself a passion, and thus usually
more concerned.

James Slayden

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Andrew Hoppin wrote:

snip

 help?  Or could they be authentically concerned that a small producer
 making
 some mistake in production will sully the image of biodiesel?  Other
 possibilities?  Regardless, if you can identify what the root of their
 problem is, then whether that root cause seems silly or not, and
 regardless

snip
 
 Cheers,
 Andrew
 
 
 The Biofuel Business Development Project
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
 Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
 On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
 
  Message: 12
 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:23:08 +0900
 From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: more info on the NBB and the soy subsidy
 
  Hello Andrew
 
  I'm would prefer to see a decentralized industry of small producers as
  well,
  but my bias is that if we're really going to make a near-term
  difference in
  our world in terms of energy security and environmental protection and
  public health with biodiesel, we need to support any and all
  companies that
  are willing to produce and distribute biodiesel, small and large.
  
  Cheers,
  Andrew
 
  Um, at the cost of having homebrewers dispensed with by means of a
  load of BS about us being nothing but a peril who'll bring it all to
  naught unless we're controlled? Or at least kept firmly in our place
  (our own backyards)? Though we can be useful... Check back and you'll
  see that that's basically what Mr Noyes of World Energy was saying.
  He was asked how many times? Three? Four? - to substantiate his
  claims that substandard-spec homebrew had caused widespread problems
  and industry had had to clean up the mess after us. He evaded the
  question each time. He can't substantiate it because it's BS. Not the
  only thing he evaded. If you think that will at least stop him making
  such unsubstantiated claims, even if he can't quite bring himself to
  withdraw them, don't hold your breath.
 
  Noyes, and others like him, couldn't cope with what we actually are
  and what we do, as opposed to his patronising idea of us. Have a look
  at how he handled the possibility of collaboration with us,
  laughable. It's on his terms or nothing, just like the other World
  Energy guy who wasted our time with this talk. We're more useful than
  these people, and it's them who make it an either-or question, not us.
 
  We're not against industry, that would be foolish, but there's
  industry and then there's industry. It's not a case of small vs
  large, there's room and need for both, as you say. Some of the big
  companies are just fine, no problem at all working with them. But
  frankly I think the world needs the likes of World Energy like it
  needs a hole in the head.
 {snip}
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] Less Than Zero

2002-11-18 Thread James Slayden

Yeah, I was thinking on that recently, and a small producer would be in an
excellent position to do well in localized rendering, providing it was
built into the business plan.  It's kinda a self serving feedstock cycle.

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, murdoch wrote:

 I think the economics and political philosophy of recycling can not
 only be interesting but at times has gotten just plain strange.
 Recycling I guess means two things, identification and disposal of
 waste (1st) and then (2nd) use of that waste rather than some sort of
 sequestration or throwing away as a disposal method.  I guess folks
 have a tough enough time paying for number one, and getting to number
 2 is just that much tougher or something.  Maybe we had so much of the
 Earth to ourselves for so many millenia that we just are having a
 tough time with our more crowded state.
 
 Looking at the history of the effort to recycle paper, it seems to me
 there was some strange volatility of recycled-paper prices.  That is,
 I think I read an article once where they said at some point you did
 have a lot of entrants into the relatively nascent market, and there
 was enthusiasm, or even over-enthusiasm for this new field that had
 met previously with skepticism, and then the bottom kind of fell out
 of the recycled paper raw feed market and so the business went back to
 being viewed skeptically?  Well, that's my recollection.
 
 Well, I'm sure there are University Professors out there doing all
 sorts of interesting and terribly important theses which are pertinent
 to the Economics of Recycling, except their ideas will probably become
 mainstream decades after they might have done us any good.  Heck, it's
 taken me years just to get some folks to understand that regenerative
 braking arguably amounts to recycling energy of motion, but I guess
 that's getting a bit off my point, and a bit away from regular
 recycling concepts.
 
 
 it's free for the taking. Biodieselers are a great way to localise
 the collection of waste oils effectively.
 
 I also saw this, but haven't managed to confirm it: Every year, U.S.
 businesses throw away enough waste vegetable oil to replace 10% of
 the petroleum products consumed in the country.
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] BD Business and Ability to be Profitable-- does big vs small matter?

2002-11-25 Thread James Slayden

Hi Andrew,

I think that business case decisions are based on things like; people
employed, feedstock cost, chemicals cost, facility costs, equipment costs
and depreciation, etc.

It takes making up a business plan and proforma to find out at what level
of production and sales can be applied.  Here in California due to the
cost of living, a single producer (ie. one person) paying himself 45K/yr
(very low wages for area) would have to make 200-500g/d and sell the fuel
between $2.00 - $3.00 gal.  That is a rough estimate, but if you include
chemical, facility, local distribution, and tax issues, this is somewhat
in the ballpark. Someone please correct me if I am way off the mark.  If
the variables can be mucked with, ie. energy inputs, facilities costs,
feedstock cost, chemical costs, then there is some leaway.

Of course as the amount of fuel one produces/sells goes up == better
wages.  But then the economies of scale come into play.  At some point
though there will be a jump in things like energy inputs, amount of people
needed to process, more equipment capital, etc.

When I have run the numbers lightly there seems to be some magical numbers
such as above 500g/d more people and equipment are needed to keep
production sustainable.  Then again @ ~1000g/d the same thing happens.  
So I am wondering if there is a formula like Moore's Law coming into play
when yields are doubled.  I'm sure a proforma would point this out fairly
easy.  Has anyone done any work on coming up with a BD business formula
for inputs/employees/production/sales for small scale producers?

Todd has a very good understanding of a small scale processors needs when
it comes to this, so you might want to talk to him.  

James Slayden

On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Andrew Hoppin wrote:

 Hello again.  One charge that I have heard public policy folks levy at
 small
 producers is along the following lines:  Small producers can't make
 their
 production business really profitable, so they're not going to be able to
 contribute significantly to mass-market conversion from fossil fuels to
 biofuels... Therefore, since our policy goal is to  maximize the use of
 cleaner domestically produced fuels, when considering policy and public
 support for BD, we'll seek to support large producers first and
 foremost.
 
 I have also spoken with small producers who themselves say that they're
 not
 sure how they'd make a profit...
 
 So, I'd like to know have your thoughts, whether in agreement or in
 rebuttal, regarding whether there is truth in this assertion, and also
 regarding what the public policy relevance should or should not be if it
 were true.  And if it is not true, then what/who are the success stories
 in
 terms of profitable small-scale production and distribution?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Andrew Hoppin
 The Biofuel Business Development Project
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
 Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
 On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
 
 N Space Labs, Inc.
 Vizualize Your Business
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 646.221.5602 (mobile)
 158 Lafayette St. 2nd Floor
 NY, NY 10013
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Andrew Hoppin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:34 PM
  To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: big vs small: quality assurance
 
 
  Hi folks.  I'm learning a lot from the ongoing lively debate--
  thank you.
 
  Regarding the issue that has been at hand-- whether big producers
  deliver better quality and reliability than small producers or
  not, and whether any quality differences are cause for concern
  among potential consumers or not:  it seems to me that one way to
  nip this in the bud REGARDLESS of whether there are valid
  concerns or not would be to have a credible BD fuel quality
  testing service, perhaps with some public funding and perhaps
  with modest fees paid by producers, perhaps on a sliding-scale
  based on the size of their revenues.  If a producer wished to be
  certified that their fuel was top-notch, they could avail
  themselves of this service by sending fuel samples (each month?)
  and fleet managers, consumers, and anyone else who cares would
  have an objective answer to their quality concerns, whether or
  not those concerns are valid.  Has this ever been undertaken?
 
  If not, would such a service effectively serve the purpose I've
  outlined, and in what form (government, non-profit, or
  for-profit) would such a service be most effectively delivered?
 
  Andrew Hoppin
  The Biofuel Business Development Project
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
  Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
  On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
  
  N Space Labs, Inc.
  Vizualize Your Business
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  646.221.5602 (mobile)
  158 Lafayette St. 2nd Floor
  NY, NY 10013
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http

Re: [biofuels-biz] big vs small: quality assurance

2002-11-25 Thread James Slayden

Andrew,

Interesting that you mention this for when I did a search on ASTM testing
services here is what I got:

Searched the web for ASTM Testing Services.   Results 1 - 4 of about 6.  

I even modified the search and got worse results.  Someone had previously
sent a link for ~$700 ASTM testing which could be rolled into a business
cost.

The EPA only requires testing to be done on a per annum basis.  Please see
Girl Mark's previous posting on homebrew methods of quality testing.

James Slayden

On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Andrew Hoppin wrote:

 Hi folks.  I'm learning a lot from the ongoing lively debate-- thank you.
 
 Regarding the issue that has been at hand-- whether big producers deliver
 better quality and reliability than small producers or not, and whether
 any
 quality differences are cause for concern among potential consumers or
 not:
 it seems to me that one way to nip this in the bud REGARDLESS of whether
 there are valid concerns or not would be to have a credible BD fuel
 quality
 testing service, perhaps with some public funding and perhaps with modest
 fees paid by producers, perhaps on a sliding-scale based on the size of
 their revenues.  If a producer wished to be certified that their fuel
 was
 top-notch, they could avail themselves of this service by sending fuel
 samples (each month?) and fleet managers, consumers, and anyone else who
 cares would have an objective answer to their quality concerns, whether
 or
 not those concerns are valid.  Has this ever been undertaken?
 
 If not, would such a service effectively serve the purpose I've outlined,
 and in what form (government, non-profit, or for-profit) would such a
 service be most effectively delivered?
 
 Andrew Hoppin
 The Biofuel Business Development Project
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
 Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
 On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
 
 N Space Labs, Inc.
 Vizualize Your Business
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 646.221.5602 (mobile)
 158 Lafayette St. 2nd Floor
 NY, NY 10013
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] information on combustion of used frying oils

2002-11-25 Thread James Slayden

Here is a link to another manufacture:

http://www.econoheat.com/

They even have AC's

James Slayden

On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Appal Energy wrote:

 Frank,
 
 Take a look at www.cleanburn.com
 
 They're just a few hours from here in Pennsylvania. We ran
 samples of Ohio crude straight out of the ground, straight
 vegetable oil and biodiesel in one of their units (one of their
 distributor's units in Ohio actually), all with fine results
 relative to the functional ability of the fuels in comparison to
 the waste motor oils they are designed to use.
 
 Granted, that's not the same as emissions results. However, these
 units are approved by the US EPA, which means that they have to
 have conducted some emissions testing using waste motor oil.
 
 Certainly WVO would be less toxic out of the chute than motor
 oil, or at least one would tend to believe so.
 
 Take a look. Perhaps e-mail them. If you need someone to make a
 call, it could be done from our end relatively easily.
 
 Todd Swearingen
 Appal Energy
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Frank Bergmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:47 AM
 Subject: [biofuels-biz] information on combustion of used frying
 oils
 
 
  Hi everyone,
 
  At this moment I am writing a fact sheet about the use of used
 Waste Vegetable Oil from restaurants. Since the ban on animal
 feed WVO needs an alternative outlet. Because the Dutch
 government is against tax redemption on bio diesel the most
 relevant outlet at this moment is heating fuel in boilers to heat
 for example glass houses. The product board helps the Dutch
 collectors of WVO to maintain their quite successful collecting
 system. Goal is to prevent WVO to disappear into a general waste
 stream.
 
  Before issuing a permit, the government wants to know more
 about the possible emissions to the air. Problem is that I don't
 have this information. I have been searching the internet for
 reports on experimental data on combustion of WVO in boilers. But
 unfortunately I didn't find anything useful. Can anyone help me?
 
  Frank Bergmans
 
 
 
 
 
   Yahoo! Groups
 Sponsor -~--
  Share the magic of Harry Potter with Yahoo! Messenger
  http://us.click.yahoo.com/4Q_cgB/JmBFAA/46VHAA/9bTolB/TM
  ---
 --~-
 
  Biofuels at Journey to Forever
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  Biofuel at WebConX
  http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
  List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
·FREE Health Insurance Quotes-eHealthInsurance.com
http://us.click.yahoo.com/1.voSB/RnFFAA/46VHAA/9bTolB/TM
-~-

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Re: Homebrewer on a soapbox! was A Response to

2002-11-27 Thread James Slayden


Keith mentioned something that I think needs to be emphisized is that the
collection rates for WVO is rather low, and within that low collection
percentage only a certain amount is actually recycled into something
valuable.  Thus although the big FF chains might do a BD venture
themselves (more as a greenwash campaingn) or work with some large BD
processors (for a commodity fee), on the whole there is a zillion small
hole-in-the-wall resturantes that will work with a homebrewer/small
producer for free removal of the WVO.  I personally know of many.  

;-)

Also, remember that the focus for the large processor is time == money, so
that the faster they can process and get a vialable product without having
to jump through too many hoops, that is the dirction they will go.  
Paying for SVO for them makes the process go smoother without all the
titration hassle, and with a consistant feedstock it also insures a
consistant fuel.  And consistancy is a good marketing tool (With OUR fuel
you won't have to worry about damage to your engine )  Both of those
areas are time and money issues. For the homebrewer time/money issue are a
moot point as it is more a hobbie thing. And for the small producer Keith
mentioned that local collection and production will beat out long distance
distrubution in price, even if the economics of scale are better for the
large producer.


James Slayden

On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Keith Addison wrote:

 Hello;
 
 Good point about third world...
 
 I can see the time when bio diesel will be marketed as
 a 'super' fuel and will priced accordingly--simple
 marketing dynamics. The only ones who will be able to
 afford it will be the very poor through aid programs
 or the well-to-do.
 
 I base this on my belief that raw fuel stocks such as
 WVO will become commodities-especially by the bigger
 chains McDonald'scDonalds-that can improve the
 profitability of restaurants.
 
 Oil is big business and when its demise comes bio
 diesel will be big business.  My advise to the small
 producers is enjoy the present and be prepared to be
 eaten by the sharks( via buy outs or other less
 pleasant means).
 
 Best Regards
 
 Alex Landels
 
 Lots been written here about the potential of local-niche production
 and much besides. There are many local-type scenarios where the big
 guys won't be able to compete, not just on a price basis, there are
 often other factors at work. Growth in at least some of these areas
 is already quite rapid. On-farm production, especially from
 integrated farms rather than monocroppers, is another such case, also
 growing rapidly. Costs can be essentially zero, and direct costs
 aside, on-farm economics will tend to keep outside stuff outside, no
 benefit.
 
 It doesn't just depend on WVO availability, though that's a few
 billion gallons a year in the US. In most industrialized countries
 collection levels are about 10%. It's unlikely to be optimized, no
 matter how valuable it gets or how much the Big Guys might be after
 it, unless collection starts at the local level, at point of
 production. This applies to virtually all waste recycling. And it
 leaves plenty of scope for small-scale operators and DIYers who're
 also working at that level. Take a closer look at some of the things
 in Mark's post about local-level initiatives.
 
 Much also been written about Big Biodiesel, and people expecting to
 be brushed aside when the time comes. There could already be too much
 local stuff going on for that to happen quite so easily. If the
 sharks come too close they could get torn to pieces by piranhas.
 
 For a comparison, local farmers' markets and CSAs are growing apace,
 and there's absolutely nothing that big agribiz interests can do
 about it, much as I'm sure they'd like to. The USDA organic standards
 a few posts have mentioned were such an attempt, but very many real
 organic farms have simply opted out and continue dealing with their
 local markets without any problems. This is also capitalism at work,
 you know - more so than big, centralized corporatism is, and it's
 more American anyway.
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] BD Business and Ability to be Profitable-- does big vs small matter?

2002-11-27 Thread James Slayden

Thanks for clarifying that Todd.  I think you sent me the same thing some
time ago, but I couldn't find the post. 


On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Appal Energy wrote:

 Guess we need to define small, medium, large and
 producer.
 
 Small - 100-500 gallons a day - 35,000-175,000 gallons per year
 (?)
 Medium - 750-1000 gallons a day - 265,000-350,000 gallons per
 year (?)
 Large - 1,500 plus gallons a day - 525,000 plus gallons per year
 (?)
 
 producer - anyone distributing off-road or on-road fuel for
 profit (?)
 
 - Original Message -
 From: girl mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:24 PM
 Subject: Re: [biofuels-biz] BD Business and Ability to be
 Profitable-- does big vs small matter?
 
 
 
 any idea on how many small producers we';re talking about in the
 us?
 
 Mark
 
 
 At 03:48 PM 11/25/2002 -0500, you wrote:
 Hello again.  One charge that I have heard public policy folks
 levy at small
 producers is along the following lines:  Small producers can't
 make their
 production business really profitable, so they're not going to
 be able to
 contribute significantly to mass-market conversion from fossil
 fuels to
 biofuels... Therefore, since our policy goal is to  maximize the
 use of
 cleaner domestically produced fuels, when considering policy and
 public
 support for BD, we'll seek to support large producers first and
 foremost.
 
 I have also spoken with small producers who themselves say that
 they're not
 sure how they'd make a profit...
 
 So, I'd like to know have your thoughts, whether in agreement or
 in
 rebuttal, regarding whether there is truth in this assertion,
 and also
 regarding what the public policy relevance should or should not
 be if it
 were true.  And if it is not true, then what/who are the success
 stories in
 terms of profitable small-scale production and distribution?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Andrew Hoppin
 The Biofuel Business Development Project
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
 Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
 On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
 
 N Space Labs, Inc.
 Vizualize Your Business
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 646.221.5602 (mobile)
 158 Lafayette St. 2nd Floor
 NY, NY 10013
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Andrew Hoppin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:34 PM
   To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: big vs small: quality assurance
  
  
   Hi folks.  I'm learning a lot from the ongoing lively
 debate--
   thank you.
  
   Regarding the issue that has been at hand-- whether big
 producers
   deliver better quality and reliability than small producers
 or
   not, and whether any quality differences are cause for
 concern
   among potential consumers or not:  it seems to me that one
 way to
   nip this in the bud REGARDLESS of whether there are valid
   concerns or not would be to have a credible BD fuel quality
   testing service, perhaps with some public funding and perhaps
   with modest fees paid by producers, perhaps on a
 sliding-scale
   based on the size of their revenues.  If a producer wished to
 be
   certified that their fuel was top-notch, they could avail
   themselves of this service by sending fuel samples (each
 month?)
   and fleet managers, consumers, and anyone else who cares
 would
   have an objective answer to their quality concerns, whether
 or
   not those concerns are valid.  Has this ever been undertaken?
  
   If not, would such a service effectively serve the purpose
 I've
   outlined, and in what form (government, non-profit, or
   for-profit) would such a service be most effectively
 delivered?
  
   Andrew Hoppin
   The Biofuel Business Development Project
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
   Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
   On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
   
   N Space Labs, Inc.
   Vizualize Your Business
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   646.221.5602 (mobile)
   158 Lafayette St. 2nd Floor
   NY, NY 10013
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups
 Sponsor -~--
 ·FREE Health Insurance Quotes-eHealthInsurance.com
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/1.voSB/RnFFAA/46VHAA/9bTolB/TM
 -
 ~-
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, 

Re: [biofuels-biz] Homebrew problems

2002-11-27 Thread James Slayden

Didn't we process a batch from the same resturante that was good (ie. a
later date)?  I thought we did that during class.  And you were mentioning
how unusual it was that you had this bad oil from a formerly good source.  
Had the bad oil experience, then went back and tested again and it was
good oil again?  I guess this is why you say to bring a titration test kit
when hunting oil.  ;-)

What your saying is really logical, that something acidic either got mixed
in or rooting food caused and acidic condition.

Dunno, although a scenario might be they just tossed some bad
vinager/acidic crap in the bin.  Operator error is usually the cause in
computer stuff, so why should it be any different with a resturante?

James Slayden

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, girl mark wrote:

 This brings up a question I';ve had for a while-
 
 are there other acids besides ffa, that are not water-soluble and are
 found
 in oils?
 
 We had some particularly terrible oil that titrated at 13 ml, and I just
 couldn't bring myself to believe that it was ffa causing the high values
 in
 the titration, as that restaurant always had decent oil before that
 particular sample. I tried doing what you're describing- washing the oil
 and pH testing the wash water and also re-titrating the oil layer to see
 if
 the acidity was something caused by water-solubles (vinegar from cooking,
 or acids from food rotting), and it seemed that it was still something
 insoluble, presumably ffa.
 thoughts?
 mark
 
 
 
 
 
 At 01:21 AM 11/27/2002 +, you wrote:
 The problems of quality of homebrew or commercial for that matter
 never seem to go away. As much as I would like to pretend that our
 bio is perfect, I want to share the latest of ours problems with the
 group in the hope that some one may benefit. I got a call that the
 fuel from the storage tank had clogged the filter on Tony's crane
 truck. Not with algae but with grease. Bear in mind that it been
 over 30°C. I went over the process that Tony had been using. We had
 been concentrating on fine tuning the separators to continually
 remove the glycerol as it formed, the fuel was completely reacted and
 the temperature was over the melting points of our longest fatty acid
 esters. The problem had to come from the washing. Now washing is a
 brutal affair compared with bubble washing and getting the emulsion
 to break involves acidifying the water(slightly I would have hoped.).
 I ran some thick cream from the bottom drain of the storage tank
 and tested it for FFA's by mixing with neutral water and titrating
 the layers. The water remained neutral but the oil took ¾ ml of
 standard NaOH . I deduced that I was dealing with FFA's not an
 inorganic acid. After performing a number of trials using acid
 catalysis and the three alcohols on hand. I found that the controls
 using alcohol alone reduced the acid number and clarified the
 product. Addition of  5% of methanol without the addition of
 Sulphuric clarified the goop within 30 minutes  at ambient
 temperature.
 We modified the post washing stage . Drying was achieved by heating
 the fuel to 115° while pumping from the bottom and spraying over
 the open top. As the dry fuel cooled to 60°C 2% methanol was added
 and the lid closed for recirculating. Once cool, ~30°C, this fuel was
 pumped across to the storage vat.  I have neglected research on the
 washing stage, hopefully we can shorten this step as well. When the
 separators work well a 200l batch can be reacted and separated to
 completion in under an hour. I believe that the separators would have
 to spin much faster to be of use in post-wash separation. I have
 designed a simple vertical centrifuge to take the place of the dairy
 separators. If I get around to building it I'll post the results.
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Cellulosic Ethanol

2002-12-05 Thread James Slayden

Anyone know who the folks in NYC who are doing the Garbage Cellulosic
process are?

James Slayden

On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Appal Energy wrote:

 Wednesday, November 27, 2002
 
 Forestry, flax seen as ethanol options
 
 Karen Briere, The Western Producer
 
 People may argue about whether Saskatchewan ethanol plants will
 use local wheat or imported corn, but one expert says neither
 feedstock is the best option.
 
 Keith Hutchence, senior research scientist at the Saskatchewan
 Research Council's petroleum branch, says he'd like to see
 ethanol plants that use cellulose feedstock.
 
 There's lots of cellulosic waste around, Hutchence said.
 
 That includes about one million tonnes of flax straw that is
 burned every year, and several million tonnes of sawdust, bark
 and branches that are produced by the forestry industry and are
 becoming an environmental problem.
 
 Hemp is a good multipurpose crop that would provide another
 source of feedstock from the cellulose fibre in the stalks.
 
 The industry is a few years away from using more of these types
 of plants, but Hutchence said it is the way of the future.
 
 We're limited to how much we can produce from grain without
 starting to disturb the grain market, he said.
 
 As a scientist, Hutchence likes the idea of more ethanol
 production, but as a farmer, he is concerned that proponents will
 get carried away thinking a larger cattle industry, spurred by
 ethanol, will save the rural economy.
 
 Two Manitoba agricultural economists have written that the
 ethanol industry in that province would rely on cheaper imported
 corn because there isn't enough feed in the Prairies to supply
 the growing livestock industry and ethanol plants.
 
 However, officials in Saskatchewan say they wouldn't be building
 plants in the province if they didn't think there was sufficient
 feedstock.
 
 Hutchence added that cellulosic plants will offer alternative
 benefits.
 
 One of the few cellulose plants operating right now is eating up
 New York garbage, he said.
 
 Hutchence is not the only proponent of cellulose-based
 production.
 
 Iogen Corp., an Ottawa-based biotech company, has been promoting
 cellulose-based production for several years.
 
 Iogen officials calculated that processing just 30 percent of the
 wheat, barley and oat straw produced in the three prairie
 provinces would produce four billion litres of ethanol.
 
 In partnership with Petro-Canada, Iogen is building a $35-million
 demonstration plant in Ottawa. The pilot plant will produce three
 to four million L of ethanol per year, and will test the
 performance of different types of straw.
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] speedy separation on a large scale

2002-12-05 Thread James Slayden

http://www.wsus.com/

Although I'm sure there are more companies out there.  BTW, They're a new
partner of the NBB.  Gotta get your advertising somehow    ;-)


James Slayden

On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Tom Branigan wrote:

 Hello,
 can anyone give me a rough idea of the types of centrifuges or liquid
 liquid
 separation equipment that could be used for the separation of glycerol
 from
 biodiesel, and the separation of water from biodiesel. (as in after
 washing)
 I have no expertise in this kind of equipment and would appreciate
 greatly
 any help on the matter. I am aiming at a plant to produce 15000 litres of
 biodiesel per week.
 
 Tom
 
 _
 Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] OT: San Diego Mexican Fruit Fly Quarantine Situation

2002-12-09 Thread James Slayden

Interesting that they are just burying the infested fruit??  Why not turn
it in to ethanol.  Truely is a a shame 


James Slayden

BTW murdoch, you have any contacts in the avocado industry??  ;-)

On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, murdoch wrote:

 
 http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20021205-_1mc5spin.html
 
 VALLEY CENTER – Organic growers inside the expected quarantine area
 here will be able to fight the Mexican fruit fly with a new variety of
 a special insecticide, state officials said yesterday.
 
 The news was great relief to organic farmers who didn't know how they
 would be able to keep their certified-organic status while battling
 the destructive fly.
 
 There's been this fear out there that was not going to happen, but
 that is really good news, said Jerome Stehly, chairman of the
 California Avocado Commission who owns a grove where the flies and
 larvae were found.
 
 There's a lot of growers in Valley Center who are organic, said
 Stehly, who also owns 10 acres of organically grown avocados near
 Interstate 15. It gives them an option so they can take their fruit
 to market.
 
 http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20021206-_1mi6mexfly.html
 
 http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/uniontrib/sun/metro/news_1mi1fly.html
 
 Organic growers are allowed to use a pesticide called spinosad, but it
 currently is unavailable because of an oversight by state officials
 who did not renew its annual registration.
 
 That was criminally negligent, Al Stehly said. Now we have one
 choice and that's malathion.
 
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 



Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] OT: San Diego Mexican Fruit Fly Quarantine Situation

2002-12-09 Thread James Slayden

Hmm, forgot about the oil content,  Sheesh, one man's trash is another's
treasure 


On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:

 Interesting that they are just burying the infested fruit??  Why not
 turn
 it in to ethanol.  Truely is a a shame 
 
 
 James Slayden
 
 BTW murdoch, you have any contacts in the avocado industry??  ;-)
 
 Hi James
 
 Ethanol and biodiesel - there's a lot of oil in that fruit, 282
 gallons an acre, it says here.
 
 Or at least compost it - good composting in the orchards would reduce
 pest attack anyway. Or even eliminate it.
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 
 
 On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, murdoch wrote:
 
  
  
 http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20021205-_1mc5spin.html
  
   VALLEY CENTER ñ Organic growers inside the expected quarantine area
   here will be able to fight the Mexican fruit fly with a new variety
 of
   a special insecticide, state officials said yesterday.
  
   The news was great relief to organic farmers who didn't know how they
   would be able to keep their certified-organic status while battling
   the destructive fly.
  
   There's been this fear out there that was not going to happen, but
   that is really good news, said Jerome Stehly, chairman of the
   California Avocado Commission who owns a grove where the flies and
   larvae were found.
  
   There's a lot of growers in Valley Center who are organic, said
   Stehly, who also owns 10 acres of organically grown avocados near
   Interstate 15. It gives them an option so they can take their fruit
   to market.
  
  
 http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20021206-_1mi6mexfl
 y.html
  
  
 http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/uniontrib/sun/metro/news_1mi1fly.html
  
   Organic growers are allowed to use a pesticide called spinosad, but
 it
   currently is unavailable because of an oversight by state officials
   who did not renew its annual registration.
  
   That was criminally negligent, Al Stehly said. Now we have one
   choice and that's malathion.
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] OT: San Diego Mexican Fruit Fly Quarantine Situation

2002-12-10 Thread James Slayden

Someone needs to come up with an alternative and get the powers that be to
believe in it!!  ;-)  One might also get grants and subsidies as a side 
benefit also 


James Slayden


On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:

 Hmm, forgot about the oil content,  Sheesh, one man's trash is another's
 treasure 
 
 Yes! Now how do we put a stop to the downright silly intermediate
 step of trashing it in the first place?
 
 Keith
 
 
 
 On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:
 
   Interesting that they are just burying the infested fruit??  Why not
   turn
   it in to ethanol.  Truely is a a shame 
   
   
   James Slayden
   
   BTW murdoch, you have any contacts in the avocado industry??  ;-)
  
   Hi James
  
   Ethanol and biodiesel - there's a lot of oil in that fruit, 282
   gallons an acre, it says here.
  
   Or at least compost it - good composting in the orchards would reduce
   pest attack anyway. Or even eliminate it.
  
   Best
  
   Keith
  
  
  
   On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, murdoch wrote:
   


  
 http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20021205-_1mc5spin.html

 VALLEY CENTER Ò Organic growers inside the expected quarantine
 area
 here will be able to fight the Mexican fruit fly with a new
 variety
   of
 a special insecticide, state officials said yesterday.

 The news was great relief to organic farmers who didn't know how
 they
 would be able to keep their certified-organic status while
 battling
 the destructive fly.

 There's been this fear out there that was not going to happen,
 but
 that is really good news, said Jerome Stehly, chairman of the
 California Avocado Commission who owns a grove where the flies
 and
 larvae were found.

 There's a lot of growers in Valley Center who are organic, said
 Stehly, who also owns 10 acres of organically grown avocados near
 Interstate 15. It gives them an option so they can take their
 fruit
 to market.


  
 http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20021206-_1mi6mexfl
   y.html


  
 http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/uniontrib/sun/metro/news_1mi1fly.html

 Organic growers are allowed to use a pesticide called spinosad,
 but
   it
 currently is unavailable because of an oversight by state
 officials
 who did not renew its annual registration.

 That was criminally negligent, Al Stehly said. Now we have one
 choice and that's malathion.
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] (fwd) (fwd) news-release: School Bus Idling ATCM

2002-12-13 Thread James Slayden

Yeah, it's kinda interesting the article on SF busses being forced to go
to CNG or some other alterna-petrol proposal, due to CARB emmision
guidelines.  Good that the Fleet manager was fighting back for Diesel,
although absolutely NO mention was made of B100 or even B20 for that
matter.  It just shocks me how little the Muni planners (and fleet
managers) know about such things.  It would be a great opportunity for
someone to do a Broker type of thing for them for B100, thus they wouldn't
have to get rid of their capital cost that already has been realized on
the present busses.

If someone doesn't do it, I might just call up Graham N. and broker it
myself    ;-)  Sheesh!!!


James Slayden


On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, murdoch wrote:

 Some in the biofuel groups and elsewhere may look askance at the CARB
 instituting such seeming common-sense measures for slightly decreasing
 emissions and improving air quality near school-children, but then
 seeming to fail to implement biofuel and other clean-air technologies.
 
 I'm not sure if CARB has made any headway in researching benefits of
 using biofuels as against dino fuels in school busses.  Remember that
 not only is CARB limited to emissions debates (NOT mileage debates)
 but they weaken or even destroy their entire footing sometimes when
 they venture into mileage and other areas (I think there's recently
 been a lawsuit from the enviro-hostile Federal government against some
 of the CARB-related activities or rulings because of their alleged
 straying from clean-air-related concerns.)
 
 Anyway, I'd love to see CARB evaluate some pilot school-bus biofuel
 programs (such as I think SSPC was running?) for some very specific
 measureable changes in school bus emissions and perhaps for some
 changes in overall community emissions if they were able to attach
 numbers to the benefits (or damages or harms) of reprocessing waste
 grease rather than allowing it to be thrown away and
 emit-gosh-knows-what from its resting hole (if I understand correctly
 what happens to some of it?).
 
 Two more strategizing notes:
 
 Since so much of the school system is publicly owned,
 (governmentally-owned-and-run), this means IMO that an agency like
 CARB has a much more clear-cut legitimate ability to mandate,
 incontrovertibly, how the fleet of busses serving those public schools
 should be run.  They are part of ownership, part of the management
 team.  I am not a fan of government-involvement in the education
 business, but this is one instance where the issue plays in favor of
 some progress, IMO.
 
 Second, busses, in particular, seem to be focus points for some of the
 alternative fuel efforts at advanced research.  You hear about this or
 that pilot program by this or that manufacture, major and minor, to
 research super-advanced batteries, fuel cells, hybrids including
 ultracaps, etc., in busses. 
 
 EFCX, for example where their semi-battery-fuel-cell (whatever the
 hell it is) technology I think has done some bus work (with GE?) and
 Maxwell was going on about GM putting some ultracaps in busses or
 large trucks for a sort of initial effort.  So, although I'm very much
 in favor of a simple straightforward gaining of knowledge and
 promulgation of a 100%-biodiesel-in-busses concept, biofuel advocates
 may wish to be aware of the compatibilities with other alt-fuel
 efforts.
 
 MM
 
 On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 14:09:11 -0800, Gennet Paauwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
 Please find the following California Air Resources Board news release
 on
 today's approval of an air toxic control measure for idling school
 buses.
 
 You may view it at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/newsrel/nr121202.htm
 
 Thanks,
 Gennet Paauwe
 Office of Communications
 California Air Reosurces Board
 
 ++
 
 
 California  Environmental  Protection  Agency
 NEWS RELEASE
 
 Air Resources Board
 
 Release 02-46
 
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 December 12, 2002
 
 CONTACT: Jerry Martin
 Gennet Paauwe
 (916) 322-2990
 www.arb.ca.gov
 
 
 Air Board Adopts Measure to Reduce Pollution from School Bus Idling
 
 SACRAMENTO --  A measure adopted today by the California Air Resources
 Board (ARB) eliminates unnecessary idling for school buses and other
 heavy-duty vehicles, protecting children from unhealthful exhaust
 emissions. The main purpose of the measure is to reduce localized
 exposure to air toxics and other harmful air pollutants at and near
 schools.
 
 “Restricted idling times at schools will not only protect our
 children
 from toxic air contaminants, but improve air quality in the
 surrounding
 area,” said ARB Chairman Alan C. Lloyd.
 
 In addition to protecting childrens’ health, reducing motor vehicle
 emissions will benefit teachers, parents, bus maintenance workers and
 drivers, and people who live or work near schools.
 
 The measure is expected to save school districts and other operators
 up
 to $800,000 in fuel costs.
 
 More than 26,000 school buses operate in California

Re: [biofuels-biz] Bubble Drying and drying questions in general

2002-12-17 Thread James Slayden

Here are some links:

http://www.cooplife.com/startcoop.htm
http://web.uvic.ca/bcics/store/manual/
http://www.agecon.uga.edu/~gacoops/info10.htm
http://www.homesteadingtoday.com/homestead/Countryside/Wcc7729cf1292d.htm
http://www.agecon.uga.edu/~gacoops/coopinfo.htm
http://www.coop.org/welcome.htm


And this one in your neighborhood:

http://www.icos.ie/content/content.asp?section_id=289
http://www.saos.co.uk/Co-operation/about_co-operation1.htm
http://www.co-op.co.uk/index.html


There are tons of links, just need to research them .  ;-)


James Slayden


On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, martin.brook wrote:

 I wondered how official your cooperative is and do you have a formal
 constitution? I aam thinking of setting up a coop in the U.K. but all the
 standard constitutions seem too stiff, do you mind telling me how yours
 works and is it reasonbly stable or is there lots of grumbling going on?
 Martin, Biofuel. org .U.K.Ltd
 - Original Message -
 From: girl mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com;
 biofuel@yahoogroups.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 6:48 AM
 Subject: [biofuels-biz] Bubble Drying and drying questions in general
 
 
  Apologies to those on multiple lists for all the cross-posting.
 
  I spammed a couple of the biofuel-related lists last week with some
  complaints about trying to make biodiesel in the midst of some dramatic
  local weather. We got the first real winter storm, serious rain- the
  Northern California version of winter is lots of rain and 60F. Not too
 much
  to complain about considering I've lived in Leningrad and in New York.
 But
  this weekend I wasn't too happy about the timing: my biodiesel
 equipment
 is
  all outside, and I had a lot of fuel that I had JUST finished washing,
 and
  it was time to let it 'dry' or 'settle'. But the weather out there was
  pounding down rain (the remnants of a Typhoon that hit Guam a few days
  earlier, it turns out).
 
  I'd just recently found some info, re-reading a couple of the the U of
  Idaho biodiesel reports, about bubble drying fuel. It somehow didn't
 make
  it into common homebrewers' practice, everyone I've talked to said,
 yeah,
 I
  remember reading that, but I didn't think about applying it to my
  situation.   So I tried it out under the worst possible conditions- ran
 a
  bubblestone into a tank of hazy biodiesel that was carefully swathed in
  tarps (therefore no real opportunity for the moisture in the biodiesel
 to
  excape outside the now-closed tank)- and ran some severely humid air
  through it.
 
  People have different techniques and theories about 'drying' biodiesel
  after washing. Some people leave it in an open container, and claim
 that
 it
  clears up any water haze in anything from a day to a week. It sounds to
 me
  that the people doing this live in dry regions. We don't.
 
  Others (like Aleks Kac' published acid-base two-stage directions) say
 to
  let fuel settle for three weeks or so until it clears water haze.
 
  Other options include heating it to drive off water. There are some
  problems with this- among them, the fact that the MSDS for biodiesel
 says
  that biodiesel fumes are not harmful to health- unless heated.  I was
  prepared to do this as I really needed some finished fuel, but I feel
 like
  it's not something to take lightly, besides the obvious unnecessary
 energy
  input.
 
  At our biodiesel coop, we do the 'settling' technique after washing
 fuel.
  Sometimes it takes 10 days, but quite often it is still hazy after that
 point.
  I was getting frustrated about having all of these drums of settling
 fuel
  sitting around at the co-op, taking up storage space, not clearing in
 the
  humid weather. It was the bottleneck that was messing up fuel
 production
  capacity- we store fuel to settle before washing, then we wash for
 three
  days and then we store it some more. And this is a 12' x 8' space in
 which
  we are trying to produce fuel for about 15-25 drivers (not very
  successfully). Sheesh. Seems like a common problem for small-scale
 homebrewers.
 
  So back to the wet weather bubbledrying- it worked to clear haze in
 that
  fuel, humid air and all. The 'technique' is to chuck an airstone into a
  tank of hazy fuel, and bubble for 24-? hours. It doesn't seem to
 make
 a
  really HUGE difference how much fuel you're working with- around here
 (in
  the humidity) Kenneth Kron cleared 3 gallons in 12+ hours, Mr.Biosmell
  cleared 55 gallons in similar conditions of humidity in under 24 hours,
  which seems about average for the several experiments with this so far
  (though in Nevada, Rainer Busch dried some fuel this way in 2-3 hours,
 in
  the dry desert air)...  In the storm, buried under a thick lid of
 plastic
  tarp, my Wet Air treatment seemed to clear up a drum of hazy fuel in
  something like two days. (I didn't check after the first 24- I
 eventually
  got sick of wading outside

Re: [biofuels-biz] Why not? (On farm fuel from hempseed oil)

2002-12-17 Thread James Slayden

Hrmm, algae for oil and the renderings for biomass .  what a boon!!

Actually algae is already being utilized for it's other properties on a
large scale in the California Desert.   Just need to move it over to BD
processing.

James Slayden


On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Appal Energy wrote:

 Using liquid fuels to produce electricity for any other use than
 backup/emergency is not very efficient. The best source for
 electricity would be the dried biomass, sans seeds. ( ~16.8
 million Btu per ton, 3 + tons per acre, 4,650 + kWh per acre).
 Heat would be the useable byproduct of the gasification (CHP -
 Continual Heat  Power).
 
 Other alternative for the biomass is to implement pyrolytic
 conversion to manufacture methanol. That would amount to ~186
 gallons of methanol per ton, or ~568 + gallons per acre. US DOE
 releases dated 1995 state a manufacturing cost of $0.20 a liter,
 with expectations of reducing those costs to ~$0.13 a liter.
 
 There literally is no other plant, save for perhaps algae (still
 in experimental stages), that can produce the same amount of
 biomass per acre in the same 90-120 day time period.
 
 Todd Swearingen
 
 - Original Message -
 From: murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
 Cc: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [biofuels-biz] Why not? (On farm fuel from hempseed
 oil)
 
 
  If these formerly waste materials are good for using as some
  transportation fuels (such as in tractors) I wonder if they
 couldn't
  also be used in generating electricity or heat.
 
 
 
  On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:12:43 -0500, you wrote:
 
  Tim,
  
  No hemp farmer in Canada or Europe is expending $600 per acre
 in
  order to get a $600 return.
  
  When you look at those who are cold pressing the seed for oil,
  you find that there is an inordinate amount of sludge that
 gets
  separated from the readily filterable oil. Cold pressing does
 not
  give the luxury of high immediate yields (although it does
 offer
  the luxury of solvent free) and due to the nature of the
 food
  grade oil business a great percentage of the oil is discarded
 as
  sludge. Eventually the sludge separates even further, leaving
  approximately 60% of what was discarded to be used for less
 than
  food grade purposes.
  
  This is the oil that would be used for biodiesel, not the
  intially pressed oil.
  
  At present, several of the oil producers in Canada are
  stockpiling their sludge. This has resulted in large
 quantities
  of hemp seed oil becoming available for fuel conversion.
  Considering the fact that this was once considered to be a
 waste
  product, utilizing it as farm fuel is not an unattractive end
  use.
  
  As well, the fines that settle out of the sludge are a superb
  chicken feed - yet another free product of what was once
  relegated to the category of waste.
  
  Todd Swearingen
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Tim Castleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:21 PM
  Subject: [biofuels-biz] Why not? (On farm fuel from hempseed
 oil)
  
  
   From: Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: Hemp Fuel Conspiracy?
  
   Why not?
  
I also wonder about farming (i.e., if a Hemp farmer could
  make just
enough to forestall having to go off-farm for fuel, if
 this
  could be
worth it to him, just for his own fuel needs... probably
  not.)
  
   This is one of those impossible questions, the answer will
  never satisfy because the fact is hemp cannabis HAS been
  deliberately repressed, several million $ is spent each year
 on
  eradication efforts on feral hemp, for example. DEA drug
 warriors
  are emotionally and financially attached to their work, and so
  perpetuate many lies and place many barriers. Perhaps the most
  insidious of which are the divisions within the
  cannabis/hemp/marijuana culture itself.
  
   This repression has prevented development of the crop per
 se,
  thus leaving us with the familiar chicken and egg scenario.
  Bottom line, when petroleum stays at $30 bbl, a plant-based
  economy will emerge.
  
   Meanwhile, yes, a farmer could grow hemp, harvest the seed
 and
  extract the oil for on farm use, but why would he with all the
  other oil crops available that will produce much more oil than
  hemp? In a practical sense, and most farmers are practical to
 a
  fault, to spend $600 or so to grow $600 or so worth of fuel
 only
  works with government subsidies. He would rather just buy it
 and
  save himself all that work!
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
  
   Biofuels at Journey to Forever
   http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
   Biofuel at WebConX
   http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
   List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
   http://archive.nnytech.net/
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
   Your use of Yahoo

Re: [biofuels-biz] City of Oakland holding a meeting aimed supporting local commercial biodiesel production

2002-12-19 Thread James Slayden

One would think that the Former Gov Brown would be all over this!!  Great
media opportunity also.  ;-)


On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Kenneth Kron wrote:

 Just thought I'd update the list.  I've been working with with the
 sustainable development person in the planning department in Oakland,
 Carol Misseldine.  Oakland is starting to understand what biodiesel is
 and is turning the beauracracy around to support it.  No date for the
 meeting yet, the attendees include: city, business and community
 representatives.
 
 
 The current agenda is:
 
 KEY AGENDA ITEMS FOR A BIODIESEL MEETING IN OAKLAND
 
 
 Drafted by Carol Misseldine, Oakland Sustainable Development Initiative,
 12/12/02
 
 
 
 *1) What quantities of the following feedstocks are realistically
 available for biodiesel in Oakland?*
 
 Waste Vegetable Oil (WVO)://
 
 //Municipal Waste Stream:
 
 *2) Is biodiesel a realistic solution or partial solution for Oakland's
 air quality problems?*
 
 3) How much of Oakland's diesel needs could be met with the above
 sources, including Oakland's City Fleet, Port trucks, public transit?
 
 4) What are the economic and siting barriers and opportunities for local
 manufacture and distribution of biodiesel?
 
 *5) What are the emissions issues related to a biodiesel manufacturing
 facility?*
 
 *6) What are the zoning requirements for a biodiesel manufacturing
 facility?* /Catherine Payne, CEDA/
 
 *7) What is the status of CARB's intent to rank biodiesel as an
 alternative fuel?* /Randall von Wedel/
 
 *8) Other*
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] Fwd: Special Alert -- Don't Delay! Register Now for the Biodiesel Research and Brainstorming Workshop

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

Would be nice if they had the sessions online for a marginal price package
.


Anyone from the NBB lurking??  ;-)

James Slayden


On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, murdoch wrote:

 If you’re interested in learning about the latest biodiesel research
 and
 technical data from North America’s leading experts, register now for
 the
 Biodiesel Research and Brainstorming Workshop, January 29-30,2003, in
 New
 Orleans.  Sponsored by the National Biodiesel Board (NBB), the US
 Department
 of Energy, and the US Department of Agriculture, the workshop is a must
 for
 biodiesel researchers and technical personnel, biodiesel fuel
 suppliers,
 engine and fuel injection equipment manufacturers, government agencies
 interested in funding biodiesel research and development, and other
 stakeholders.
 
 What about general all 'round alt-fuel trouble-makers?  Are we
 excluded?  :-)
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Re: Time Magazine features Direct Liquid Ethanol Fuel Cells

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

Just was perusing the Medis webpage, they seem to have some smaller eth
battery technology they are going into.  I am interested in the rotay
engine they have as it could be useful for a hybrid application.  MM,
Biodiesel hybrid ..  Guess Capstone is also a competing technology,
might get even more bang for the buck.

BTW, they seem to be focused on the portable market right now, but it
seems to be the fuelcell growth pattern over the last few years to move
into remote Telco applications before taking on larger projects.  Ballard
is really the only one serious about the transportation sector (so far).


James Slayden

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, murdoch wrote:

 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:07:14 -0600, you wrote:
 
 For a while now I have had it in my mind that I should produce ethanol
 in my back yard from biomass. Make electricity from the ethanol. Then,
 use the electricity to power my home and sell the excess to the power
 company. Easy right. Any coments.
 
 I'd like to see more attempts at this, but quite often when I mention
 using biomass to make electricity, folks try to shoot it down because
 it is not as presently efficient as they would like to see.  I think
 that it's a challenge worth exploring, particularly given new
 technologies such as fuel cells.
 
 I also strongly agree with Kirk that cogeneration can make-or-break
 whether this project is energy efficient.  This was particularly true
 in fuel cells, in a table I once saw of their energy efficiencies.  It
 was only with cogeneration, with some of them, that they got above the
 40, 50, 60 percent marks.
 
 I really want to see ethanol fuel cells.  Ethanol is the only fuel on
 the list of potential fuel cell fuels that the Petroleum Industry
 doesn't presently dominate, and it is, consequently (my opinion) not
 talked about nearly as often as other potential fuel cell fuels.
 
 When I spoke to Medis two years ago they had not yet got to the point
 where their Ethanol Fuel Cell technology could be readily scaled up to
 house-powering size.  I don't know where they are at with that issue
 right now, nor do I know if theirs is best for such an attempt,
 because I think their ethanol fuel cell concepts necessitated some
 sort of secret ingredient aspect.  My guess is that there are several
 companies whose cells could, with some effort, be adapted to ethanol
 use.
 
 MM
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] toxins in this season U.S. corn

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

Of Course, if someone out there in the growing belt gets a clue .  ;-O

lemme see   make oil, turn into biodiesel, take cake, make into
ethanol, use dried mash as heat source for ethanol process, use some of
ethanol for biodiesel process, use sun for heating corn SVO

Dunno, seems doable.  ;-)

James Slayden

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, murdoch wrote:

 http://biz.yahoo.com/rm/021220/food_corn_toxin_1.html
 
 I wonder how they'll use some of it if it is deemed unfit for human
 consumption.  Looks like they'll feed some of it to animals.  I wonder
 if it can be used to make fuel.
 
 Reuters
 U.S. farmers form task force to fight corn toxins
 Friday December 20, 5:24 pm ET
 
 
 CHICAGO, Dec 20 (Reuters) - U.S. farmers have formed a task force to
 limit toxins in future corn crops after the worst outbreak of
 aflatoxin since 1988, an industry official said Friday.
 Our overall goal is to minimize the major mycotoxins (from corn) and
 we're going to be looking at that through a bunch of different avenues
 including hybrid research, said Paul Bertels, a grain quality
 specialist with the National Corn Growers Association.
 
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 
 The task force will find ways to fund research into corn varieties
 resistant to toxins. It will also develop better sampling techniques
 at country elevators, Bertels told Reuters.
 
 The move comes after the highest levels of aflatoxin in 14 years were
 found in the U.S. Midwest corn crop after this summer's drought.
 
 Aflatoxin, a cancer-causing toxin found in moldy corn, can cause
 cancer in humans if consumed at high levels and can be deadly to young
 animals if they consume large amounts.
 
 It is usually found in the southern parts of the Corn Belt, especially
 Texas, where the crop often comes under heat stress. But this year's
 heat wave that plagued the heart of the Corn Belt in July and August
 put the Midwest crop at high risk for aflatoxin.
 
 High levels of aflatoxin were found not only in Texas and Nebraska but
 as far north as northern Illinois.
 
 The group will also seek to eliminate another corn mold, fumonisin, a
 fungus and cancer-causing substance that is also linked to human birth
 defects. Fumonisin is much more widespread than aflatoxin across the
 Midwest, thriving under heat and humid conditions.
 
 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has set aflatoxin limits for
 food consumption at 20 parts per billion. The maximum tolerance for
 livestock feed has been established at 300 parts per billion.
 
 FDA recommends fumonisin in food to be under five parts per million
 and under 100 parts per million in livestock feed.
 
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Burning sunflowers

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

Now this sounds really interesting!!  Do you have a link to the Company??

James Slayden

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, David Teal wrote:

 Quote from the Leeds University alumni magazine
 www.leeds.ac.uk/alumni :
 
 Fuel and energy researchers are hoping to use sunflower oil to produce
 hydrogen, a fuel of the future.  Hydrogen has been attractive as a fuel
 because it can create electricity with no harmful emissions.  Most
 methods
 of producing the gas, however, create pollution.  Researchers are testing
 a
 pollution free system using only sunflower oil, air, water vapour and two
 special catalysts.
 
 David T.
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Burning sunflowers

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

Ah, thanks.

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, David Teal wrote:

 Sorry, direct ref should be:
 http://reporter.leeds.ac.uk/483/s3.htm
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Burning sunflowers

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

It kinda sounds like they are also using some type of supercritical CO
method for oil extraction, thus leaving a somewhat clean process.

Todd, you have links to any white papers on CO to Methanol conversion?  I
haven't had much success before.

Thanks,


James Slayden


On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Appal Energy wrote:

  http://reporter.leeds.ac.uk/483/s3.htm
 
 All a bit elusive... quote:
 
 Most methods of producing hydrogen burn another fuel for energy,
 which itself creates pollution - carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides
 and other emissions, said Dr Dupont. Our catalyst uses oxygen
 from the air to heat up naturally, and this heat is used to
 reform the oil with steam to create hydrogen. The excess carbon
 dioxide is taken into the second catalyst, then released for
 storage or use in other chemical processes, ensuring that
 damaging levels of CO2 aren't just put back into the atmosphere.
 
 Oxygen from the air to heat up naturally... Interesting. I
 wonder what their loss rate of catalyst, or energy cost to
 restore it if needed, or life cycle energy cost to refine it.
 
 They mention pyrolysis in a latter paragraph. Wonder where they
 get the damaging levels of CO2? If they were using the pyrolytic
 fuels from the process itself to perpetuate stripping (not
 creating) hydrogen they would be carbon neutral at worst, erego
 no damaging levels of CO2. Not to say that CO2 recovery is not
 intelligent, as it could be used to produce methanol as a useable
 byproduct, among other things.
 
 Todd Swearingen
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Re: Burning sunflowers

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

BYW, they might want to pick a seed with higher oil content.

http://www.journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html

James Slayden


On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, hcr_ii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Todd, when I was a student in this department there was quite a bit
 of work being done on the pyrolysis of coal. I suspect this is what
 they are talking about in this paragraph:
 
 Waste pyrolysis oil is currently burned as fuel, but this can be
 quite polluting, said Dr Dupont. Our system would still make use
 of its energy potential, while allowing the often noxious chemicals
 in the oil to be more easily controlled.
 
 i.e. 'waste' oil from a totally separate process, not the co-product
 of the steam reforming of sunflower oil.
 
 H
 
 
 --- In biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com, Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
   http://reporter.leeds.ac.uk/483/s3.htm
 
  All a bit elusive... quote:
 
  Most methods of producing hydrogen burn another fuel for energy,
  which itself creates pollution - carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides
  and other emissions, said Dr Dupont. Our catalyst uses oxygen
  from the air to heat up naturally, and this heat is used to
  reform the oil with steam to create hydrogen. The excess carbon
  dioxide is taken into the second catalyst, then released for
  storage or use in other chemical processes, ensuring that
  damaging levels of CO2 aren't just put back into the atmosphere.
 
  Oxygen from the air to heat up naturally... Interesting. I
  wonder what their loss rate of catalyst, or energy cost to
  restore it if needed, or life cycle energy cost to refine it.
 
  They mention pyrolysis in a latter paragraph. Wonder where they
  get the damaging levels of CO2? If they were using the pyrolytic
  fuels from the process itself to perpetuate stripping (not
  creating) hydrogen they would be carbon neutral at worst, erego
  no damaging levels of CO2. Not to say that CO2 recovery is not
  intelligent, as it could be used to produce methanol as a useable
  byproduct, among other things.
 
  Todd Swearingen
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] SUV, truck owners get a big tax break

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

Now, it certainly doesn't say gas or diesel  ;-)

looking at the list, the Dodge Ram 2500 seems like a nice little
pickup (hehehehehe). Time to start that business 

Yummie:

http://www.dodge.com/ram_hd/model_overview/index.html


James Slayden

On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Keith Addison wrote:

 http://www.detnews.com/2002/autosinsider/0212/18/c01-38875.htm
 - 12/18/02
 Wednesday, December 18, 2002
 
 David Coates / The Detroit News
 
 Karl Wizinsky, a health care consultant in Novi, was able to write
 off $32,000 of the $47,000 purchase price of a Ford Excursion as a
 business expense. It's perfectly legal, and accountants and auto
 dealers are starting to catch on.
 
 SUV, truck owners get a big tax break
 
 Loophole allows hefty write-off for vehicles
 
 By Jeff Plungis / Detroit News Washington Bureau
 
 Eligible vehicles
 
 Here are the 38 light truck models that qualify for an extra $24,000
 accelerated depreciation tax break:
   BMW X5
   Cadillac Escalade
   Chevy Astro
   Chevy Avalanche
   Chevy Express
   Chevy Silverado
   Chevy Suburban
   Chevy Tahoe
   Dodge Durango
   Dodge Ram Van
   Dodge Ram Maxi Van
   Dodge Ram Wagon
   Dodge Ram 1500
   Dodge Ram 2500
   Dodge Ram 3500
   Ford Excursion
   Ford Expedition
   Ford Econoline E-150
   Ford Econoline E-250
   Ford Econoline E-350
   Ford F-150
   Ford F-250
   Ford F-350
   GMC Yukon
   GMC Safari
   GMC Savana
   GMC Sierra
   GMC Sierra Denali
   Land Rover Discovery
   Land Rover Range Rover
   Lincoln Blackwood
   Lincoln Navigator
   Mercedes ML 320
   Mercedes ML 500
   Mercedes ML55 AMG
   Toyota Land Cruiser
   Toyota Sequoia
   Toyota Tundra
 
 Comment on this story
 Send this story to a friend
 Get Home Delivery
 
 WASHINGTON -- Karl Wizinsky wasn't thinking about buying a new
 vehicle, and certainly not a big SUV. So why is there a brand-new
 $47,000 Ford Excursion sitting in his driveway?
 
 He was able to write off $32,000 of the purchase price as a business
 expense.
 
 We really did it because it was a pretty hefty deduction, said
 Wizinsky, a health care consultant in Novi.
 
 At the same time the tax code sanctions $30,000 write-offs for SUVs,
 prospective purchasers of a fuel-efficient hybrid vehicles qualify
 for a relatively small $4,000 tax credit.
 
 A deal to extend similar tax credits to other environmentally
 friendly vehicles remains stalled in Congress.
 
 It's all legal, and accountants and auto dealers are beginning to catch
 on.
 
 If it can save the consumer money, it's most likely that the dealer
 is going to know about it, said Andrew Beck, spokesman for the
 National Automobile Dealers Association. So far, there is no
 indication anyone in Congress wants to close the loophole. In fact,
 even higher depreciation tax breaks are on the table as part of the
 next round of tax cuts President Bush is planning.
 
 The SUV tax break is becoming a staple of advice in the accounting
 world, as small business owners such as Wizinsky are advised on ways
 to reduce end-of-the-year tax bills.
 
 The size of the tax break has been growing under a schedule that
 became law in 1996. That's when Congress changed tax law to encourage
 business investment.
 
 The scale of the tax break surprises accountants and tax experts, who
 feel bound to recommend SUVs and other light trucks to small-business
 clients.
 
 As I understood it, the reason (for the tax break) is to encourage
 business investment. That's what happened in my case, Wizinsky said.
 
 At the same time, the tax break seems to contradict other national
 goals, such as improving vehicle fuel efficiency. A more economical
 fleet would aid two important national goals: reducing U.S.
 dependence on foreign oil and cutting greenhouse gasses.
 
 The total cost of the loophole hasn't been calculated by the
 government, but Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan Washington
 watchdog group, estimates the SUV tax loophole could cost taxpayers
 between $840 million and $987 million for every 100,000 vehicles sold
 to businesses.
 
 Aileen Roder, the group's program director, questioned whether there
 is a national need to subsidize sales of the largest light trucks --
 given Americans are buying SUVs in record numbers.
 
 This is one of the most lucrative breaks in the tax code, Roder
 said. We're making it a fiscal no-brainer for businesses to buy
 giant SUVs.
 
 To get an idea of the scale of the SUV tax break, a credit aimed at
 making it easier for small businesses to comply with the Americans
 with Disabilities Act costs $525 million per 100,000 uses.
 
 A tax credit to reimburse teachers for classroom supplies annually
 costs the treasury $250 million per 100,000 uses.
 
 And a provision allowing taxpayers to put up to $3,000 of tax-free
 earnings per year in private retirement accounts costs about $90
 million per 100,000 taxpayers, according to Taxpayers for Common
 Sense.
 
 There are long-standing limits on deductions to prevent taxpayers
 from subsidizing

[biofuels-biz] Bruning Feed and Grain

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

Hola Everyone,

http://www.bruninggrainco.com/pdf%27s/electric.pdf

Note the more environmental extraction process.  Also note the concern for
Mad Cow and Hoof  Mouth from (I suppose) rendering?!  I can only guess
when the article talks about non-natural meal products it means animal
renderings and also WVO included into the meal.  Yuck!!  Glad to see that
someone in the industry is actually speaking about it.  Good selling point
also.  Now, just get rid of the GMO's and the chemicals in the AG.

Hey, for all those BD'lers out there, it indicates that their oil is lower
in FFA's due to their extraction process.  I wonder if this has been
tested?


James Slayden


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] Australia puts off imposing cap on ethanol in fuel

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

When I lived in Illinois in the late 70's, they had just started selling
Gassahol (10%eth, 90%gas), and I started using it.  Within 2 months the
fuel filter clogged due to the tank clearing.  Just replaced the fuel
filter and all was well.  Didn't seem to be any effect on the rubber parts
at all.  BTW, I had a 350 Camaro (hopped up of course) and it did way
better on the gassahol than standard petrol.  I used to street race it
sometimes .  but that is another story better left unsaid.


James Slayden

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, murdoch wrote:

 Trials conducted in NSW on their own vehicle fleet since 1992 by Park
 Petroleum, and in the wider NSW fleet since 1994, clearly indicate
 that the wide range of new and advanced technologies introduced into
 the global vehicle fleet over the past twenty years provide vehicles
 with the capacity to operate on higher ethanol blends without
 experiencing drivability or operability difficulties.
 
 This is really what I'm after.  The rest, while interesting and
 relevant, is not at the heart of it.  I'm aware, for example, that an
 attempt to limit things to 10%, if unwarranted, is just a pretext by
 the petroleum companies to keep most of their monopoly on providing
 fuel for transportation.
 
 One thing on my mind is that if there are any differences or effects,
 or even just something minor that a new user of a 20% ethanol blend
 might need to know in order to be better prepared for any effects,
 then it's arguable that they should have some labeling might help such
 drivers.  But I guess a decent widespread publicity campaign (your
 fuel filter may temporarily be clogged due to long-term buildup of
 this or that, here is what to do about that) would also help.
 
 Why would there be damage? What damage has there been in Brazil, the
 US, and elsewhere, where millions or billions of miles have been
 driven on higher blends than that, without damage or being stopped
 cold by water? What damage has there been in Autralia? If there was
 any actual damage it would surely have been trundled out rather than
 an outboard motor that might stall or something.
 
 I have never used an appreciable amount of ethanol in a vehicle.  Once
 or twice over the years I've seen angry or upset letters of drivers
 who have traveled to an area where ethanol was introduced to their
 cars and they believed it has caused a problem or two.  So, I do not
 wish to dismiss out-of-hand the idea that there could be an adverse
 affect upon vehicle performance from introduction of ethanol where it
 has not been used before, or where its amount had previously been at
 lower percentages.  Adverse performance might be something as simple
 as temporarily clogged fuel filter, or something worse that I don't
 appreciate.  I figure I'll ask the question, since it's being raised,
 and since possibly others are reluctant to ask.
 
 Obviously, the over-riding issue is that the Petroleum Monopoly is
 being unethical and spreading disinformation.  In order for me to sort
 the information from the disinformation (the most effective lies
 having just enough truth to them) I need to look around a bit.
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: Methane to Methanol was Re: [biofuels-biz] Burning sunflowers

2002-12-23 Thread James Slayden

Thanks Todd.  Yep, I have looked at a search stream before, and have read
a significant amount, but have not found exactly what I was looking
for.  But the link you sent on landfill gas is!!  :)


James Slayden


On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Appal Energy wrote:

 Personally, no white papers in hand. But a Google search for
 'Methane conversion Methanol' will give you weeks of bedtime
 reading material. Even a few methods on how to produce acetic
 acid, but unfortunately too much methanol is derived at the same
 time...Go figger!
 
 Conversion process using landfill gas...
 http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/97/97ng/ng97_pdf
 /NGP4.PDF
 
 Conversion process using natural gas...
 http://www.aeeseap.org/conf2000/contents/09/0903.pdf
 
 Todd Swearingen
 
 - Original Message -
 From: James Slayden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 12:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [biofuels-biz] Burning sunflowers
 
 
  It kinda sounds like they are also using some type of
 supercritical CO
  method for oil extraction, thus leaving a somewhat clean
 process.
 
  Todd, you have links to any white papers on CO to Methanol
 conversion?  I
  haven't had much success before.
 
  Thanks,
 
 
  James Slayden
 
 
  On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Appal Energy wrote:
 
http://reporter.leeds.ac.uk/483/s3.htm
  
   All a bit elusive... quote:
  
   Most methods of producing hydrogen burn another fuel for
 energy,
   which itself creates pollution - carbon monoxide, nitrogen
 oxides
   and other emissions, said Dr Dupont. Our catalyst uses
 oxygen
   from the air to heat up naturally, and this heat is used to
   reform the oil with steam to create hydrogen. The excess
 carbon
   dioxide is taken into the second catalyst, then released for
   storage or use in other chemical processes, ensuring that
   damaging levels of CO2 aren't just put back into the
 atmosphere.
  
   Oxygen from the air to heat up naturally... Interesting. I
   wonder what their loss rate of catalyst, or energy cost to
   restore it if needed, or life cycle energy cost to refine it.
  
   They mention pyrolysis in a latter paragraph. Wonder where
 they
   get the damaging levels of CO2? If they were using the
 pyrolytic
   fuels from the process itself to perpetuate stripping (not
   creating) hydrogen they would be carbon neutral at worst,
 erego
   no damaging levels of CO2. Not to say that CO2 recovery is
 not
   intelligent, as it could be used to produce methanol as a
 useable
   byproduct, among other things.
  
   Todd Swearingen
  
  
   Biofuels at Journey to Forever
   http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
   Biofuel at WebConX
   http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
   List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
   http://archive.nnytech.net/
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
 Service.
  
 
 
  Biofuels at Journey to Forever
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  Biofuel at WebConX
  http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
  List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Fwd: ETHANOL IN CALIFORNIA

2002-12-26 Thread James Slayden

Um, why do people forget about Arkenol??!!  They have been around actually
doing cellulosic ethanol already in the Sacramento area test plant.

http://www.arkenol.com/

I have read up on all of Novozymes, but remember they are biotech, and
that is something that should be carefully considered.


James Slayden


On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, murdoch wrote:

 Very interesting.  The inclusion of Genencor and Novozymes is
 interesting because they're the sort of cellulosic sourcing that has
 been mentioned (by DOE study) as make-or-break for getting
 waste-to-ethanol going and making ethanol more economical in
 California and elsewhere.
 
 It was an alternative-energy fund manager who mentioned Gcor to me
 when he was looking around for ethanol investments.
 
 On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 13:13:28 +0900, you wrote:
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 16:38:46 EST
 Subject: ETHANOL IN CALIFORNIA
 To: (a helluva lot of people, including me)
 
 The American Coalition for Ethanol and The Clean Fuels Development
 Coalition
 are pleased to announce a workshop to be held in Sacramento California
 on
 February 6th .
 
 ETHANOL IN CALIFORNIA: OPPORTUNITIES FOR INCREASED
 UTILIZATION AND PRODUCTION
 will feature representatives from industry and government such as
 the California Energy Commission
 the California Department of Food and Agriculture
 General Motors Corporation,
 ConocoPhillips
 Genencor International
 Novozymes of North America, Inc., and others.
 
 The workshop will be held at the Radisson Hotel in Sacramento
 Registration fee is just $99.00.  You can register online through
 www.ethanol.org/caconference.htmwww.ethanol.org/caconference.htm
 or call
 Wendy Buren at 605-334-3381.
 Hotel Registration is through the Radisson at 916-922-7353.
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Fwd: ETHANOL IN CALIFORNIA

2002-12-30 Thread James Slayden

On the note of SSPC, I recently called them to for some brokering info on
their fuel (about a week ago) and still no call back.  Prolly just the
holidays .  but, this is the kind of lack of response that I have
gotten before.  They must be doing well to ignore folks.  ;-)

James Slayden

On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, murdoch wrote:

 On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 15:39:19 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
 
 Um, why do people forget about Arkenol??!!  They have been around
 actually
 doing cellulosic ethanol already in the Sacramento area test plant.
 
 http://www.arkenol.com/
 
 Well, until this moment I had never heard of them (or perhaps I've run
 across them once or twice and forgotten). 
 
 Let me check on something. [checking]
 
 genencor: GCOR
 Novozymes: nvzmf.pk
 Southern States Power: SSPC
 arkenol: apparently not publicly traded.
 
 This is not a criticism.  In fact, quite the contrary, I admire the
 heck out of private businesses and often find it quite refreshing to
 see web pages offering news and product information without a link to
 investor relations.  But, for better or worse, when a company's owners
 sell out to the marketplace of publicly traded companies, their stock
 becomes a chip in the casino and attracts all manner of interest.
 Sometimes that's really all it ever is. 
 
 SSPC for example has been a disappointment for years and, in my view,
 was (or still is?) run by *extremely* poor management who did *not*
 put their best into the biofuel cause.  They might even have been
 conscious looters, but that's a difficult diagnosis to make, as I am
 just judging by past management compensation levels and
 business-levels (or *lack* thereof), along with a couple of other
 clues.  I still have some incurable hope for them, but it's kind of
 pathetic.  The others I have not looked at in years, although like I
 said, GCOR was mentioned to me by a fund manager so they did attract
 some interest.
 
 Anyway, I'll try to remember to watch arkenol.
 
 MM
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] OT: Perspective on US Oil Dependencies

2002-12-30 Thread James Slayden

Looks good.

James Slayden

On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Hakan Falk wrote:

 
 I wrote the following for publication at Energy Saving Now, please
 look,
 comment, correct and suggest a good heading, I took the heading for this
 discussion as a temporary one and maybe it is the best. I would also be
 happy if Keith could look at the language.
 
 Perspective on Oil Dependencies
 ---
 It does not take much knowledge in mathematics to understand that the
 equations in the demand and supply situation is impossible. See attached
 article from New York Times [Dec 27, 2002] WASHINGTON Dec. 25 (will be a
 link on the site).  We have said this many times in our discussions.
 Middle
 East have 70% of the oil reserves, Iraq and Saudi Arabia have more than
 half of those. According to professor Hubbert's calculations for
 production
 from finite resources, Middle east is at the moment at the peak of
 production capacity and will not have the capacity to meet the demands.
 professor Hubbert's methods have proven to be quite accurate during the
 last 50 years of experiences from them.
 
 It is no relief for the world and it is no escape from the dependence of
 Middle East oil reserves. North America who is taking around a third of
 the  current oil production, or half of the industrialized countries use
 of
 oil, is already at a difficult junction. They have to chose if they are
 going to secure the oil supplies by force and occupation or trust
 democratic and peaceful means. The peaceful route is very insecure,
 especially with the current Israel - Palestine problem, that have to be
 solved very fast if it should be possible. Israel is a loose canon with
 its
 current policies of occupation and suppression. US and UK are in favor of
 the occupation of Iraq. They would in this case secure the Iraqi oil and
 with enough troops in Iraq, they would have sufficient pressure on Saudi
 Arabia to make them walk the line. Iraq with Saddam Hussein nor the
 Palestine resistant movements are smart enough to realize that a
 confrontation policy is at this time the worst they can do, since it
 gives
 US and UK the alibi for occupation. All alternatives in this equation is
 high risk games and can backfire, the occupation alternative has a very
 short window of opportunity, if it should have any excuses based on war
 against terrorism or weapons of mass destruction. Passing this window, an
 occupation have to be done in the light of a brutal and illegal
 occupation,
 against a popular world opinion including and the popular support in UK
 and
 US. that maybe make it impossible to do.
 
 The oil industry are not helping and are basically divided in two camps.
 The Dutch based Shell and some other minor oil companies, against the US,
 UK and other major oil companies. It is almost pathetic to see the
 resistant towards ethanol and biodiesel/SVO, with the propaganda war in
 Australia as the current and most visible example. It is also pathetic to
 see the slow phase of implementing energy saving measures. This in a time
 when our achievements the next 10 to 20 years are going to be the most
 crucial in modern times.
 
 For emerging industrial nations and developing countries, it is no space
 in
 the oil equation. It does not take much of mathematical and political
 knowledge to come to this conclusion. The only road to continuing
 development is aggressive energy conservation and alternative energy
 sources. The successes are gong to be measured in how fast the can
 develop
 oil independence.
 
 Hakan
 
 
 
 At 12:00 AM 12/30/2002 -0800, murdoch wrote:
 Growing U.S. Need for Oil From the Mideast Is Forecast
 Despite White House statements, US growing more dependent on Saudi
 oil.
 
 Source: New York Times [Dec 27, 2002] WASHINGTON Dec. 25 — As
 President Bush seeks to reduce American reliance on oil imported from
 the Persian Gulf, new government studies predict that in two decades
 the West will be even more dependent on oil from Saudi Arabia and
 other Middle Eastern producers.
 
 Mr. Bush, asked a week ago on the ABC News program 20/20 about the
 importance of Saudi Arabian oil, said that we must have an energy
 policy that diversifies away from dependency on foreign sources of
 oil — including some that don't like America.
 
 Late last month, the Department of Energy's Energy Information
 Administration forecast that in 2025 the majority — 51 percent — of
 world oil production would come from the Organization of the Petroleum
 Exporting Countries. About two-thirds of OPEC production, in turn,
 emanates from the Persian Gulf. The Energy Information Administration,
 or E.I.A., says OPEC now produces 38 percent of the world's oil.
 
 The information administration projects that Saudi Arabia will need to
 produce 22 million barrels a day by 2020 to meet increased world
 demand, far in excess of its current production of about 8 million
 barrels.
 
 We're going to rely more and more on the Middle East

Re: [biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!

2003-01-06 Thread James Slayden

Hi Andrew,

This is what I was asking of Keith a few weeks (months) ago.  He indicated
that it would be almost impossible to maintain due to price flucuations
within the market.  Prices across the board are very different at present
as there is no futures market for biodiesel (yet!!).  Also, since the
product can be produced with different feedstocks and the prices
associated with those, distribution costs, brokering costs, etc 

As you can see it can be a daunting task.  I think if all you wanted was a
baseline for general BD costs in various areas, that would be fine.  If
your trying to define a business plan on some hard numbers it might be
more difficult.

Comparing the cost of Dino Diesel(DD) to BD is not really productive since
the product DD is a fairly well known process and most of the manufactures
do it in a similar way.  BD on the other had as explained above has some
wildly varying price points.  Another thing that will inhibit a cross
comparision is that DD is subsidized and BD is not.  Here is an
example; over the weekend I was helping to make fuel at the Berkley
Biodiesel Co-op and was talking to a person who lives in SF on how much he
pays for his BD. He indicated that it was over $3 a gallon!!  I was
supprised that it was so much, but when one compares this unsubsidized
price to the subsidized price of DD (~$1.50 - $1.85 depending on where one
lives), it doesn't look half bad.  Somewhere it was noted that the
true price for a gallon of gas was ~$18.  Of course we don't see that
true cost as we pay for it in our taxes.

I still think that your pricing project is noble and can only benefit
all. :)

James Slayden



On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Andrew Hoppin wrote:

 If anyone does pull together a list of BD prices at pumps around the US
 or
 around the world, I'll volunteer to put it all on a color-coded (by
 price)
 map for everyone so that we can get a big picture view of where BD is
 currently competitive price-wise... It would help greatly if the cost of
 fossil diesel at the same pumps were also collected at the same time, so
 that we can compare.
 
 For the US, NBB has a partial list of public pumps, petroleum
 distributors
 that sell it, and direct BD suppliers, complete with phone numbers to
 contact them all and inquire about their prices...
 www.biodiesel.org/buyingbiodiesel/guide/
 
 Cheers,
 Andrew
 
 N Space Labs, Inc.
 www.NSpaceLabs.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 212.219.0851 (office)
 646.221.5602 (mobile)
 594 Broadway, #611
 NY, NY 10012
 
 The Biofuel Business Development Project
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
 Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
 On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
 
 Message: 2
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 13:23:46 -0800
From: murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [biofuel] BD at $1.50/gallon?!
 
 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:45:06 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
 
 Hey Keith,
 
 On that note, it would be great to pull together a table to get prices
 around the US/World for BD.  Prices need to be verified by a scanned
 reciept or picture of the pump though.  It would help people to decide
 if
 they want to buy or produce themselves based just on pump cost.
 
 It might also help if BD were traded on one or more of the major
 exchanges.  At least, in my view.
 
 MM
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] oil @ $33 per barrel

2003-01-06 Thread James Slayden

Todd, thanks for the humor.  You made my day!!

On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Appal Energy wrote:

 Aye, but it's not just the oil prices that are going to freak
 people out at the pumps or when paying the tab for home heating
 oil.
 
 Have an ailing airline industry tetering on the brink? Higher
 fares = less customers which equals increased tailspin.
 
 Have a struggling economy and a president who hopes to blue
 blazes consumers go out and buy, buy, buy? Not on your life if
 the cost of goods start going up as a result of increase fuel
 costs. Which equals another tailspin on consumer purchases.
 
 Fewer purchases = more layoffs. More layoffs = fewer purchases.
 
 Have a war being staged in the wings that will inevitably disrupt
 oil economics, especially when already in a destabilized price
 escalation mode?
 
 Well gee Rummy! Maybe we should hold off a bit on the moral
 imperitive (or was that oil imperitive) so we can keep our poll
 ratings stablized.
 
 Jimmy Carter is probably shaking his head in amazement at how
 stupidly repetetive all this continues to be, decade after
 decade.
 
 Fireside chat with G.W. Shrub anyone? Hopefully he'll wear
 something a little more functional than a golf sweater. Maybe
 he'll even reinstall those solar collectors atop the White House
 that uncle Ronny had removed right after his election in 1980.
 
 At times like this, perhaps the world should be thankful for how
 Florida turned over so that the ignorance of US oil/foreign
 policy can be magnified enough for even the most near sighted.
 
 Todd Swearingen
 
 - Original Message -
 From: murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:44 PM
 Subject: [biofuels-biz] oil @ $33 per barrel
 
 
 
 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyu=/dowjones/20030103/
 bs_dowjones/200301031651000359
 
  Nothing special in this article, just linking it for the
  price-reference.  It is interesting to see Venezuela
 exacerbating the
  situation (as though a gulf war wouldn't already drive prices
 up).
 
  Not mentioned is the issue of the Strategic Reserve.  I hope
 that the
  price of oil goes up because the sooner we see some of the
 reality of
  our importation needs, the better. But, on the issue of the
 reserve,
  my recollection is I read an article a few weeks ago wondering
 aloud
  if President Bush would tap into it if a war came and claiming
 that
  arguably an error by his father had been to not go into it soon
 enough
  during the previous Gulf War.
 
  I hope this President keeps making the same error.  In a way
 it's
  understandable.  I warship or an F-16 can't exactly wage war
 without
  some oil.
 
  In the long run, it'll be best for the States, I think, to
 understand
  the consequences of our oil setup.  What's good for Exxon-Mobil
 is not
  necessarily the same thing as what's good for citizens of The
 United
  States.
 
  This article seems to have looked at the reserve question last
 week:
 
 
 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyu=/nm/20021230/bs_nm/
 energy_congress_dc_4
 
 
 
  Biofuels at Journey to Forever
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  Biofuel at WebConX
  http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
  List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 HGTV Dream Home Giveaway
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] oil @ $33 per barrel

2003-01-06 Thread James Slayden

actually MM, Rayon is made from corn starch and some nasty chemicals.  :)

On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, murdoch wrote:

 Have a struggling economy and a president who hopes to blue
 blazes consumers go out and buy, buy, buy? Not on your life if
 the cost of goods start going up as a result of increase fuel
 costs. Which equals another tailspin on consumer purchases.
 
 I used to have a rule in going clothing shopping to avoid, as much as
 possible, any artificial materials.  But I must confess recently some
 of them seem better-done.  I still try to avoid them, but if oil
 prices go up, so too might some clothing prices, and not that
 insignificantly.  Even if made 12,000 miles away, a shirt with rayon
 or whatever in it will cost a bit more.
 
 At times like this, perhaps the world should be thankful for how
 Florida turned over so that the ignorance of US oil/foreign
 policy can be magnified enough for even the most near sighted.
 
 It's been surreal watching this happen, and will continue to be.  It's
 possible that you are correct that it is perhaps better to see this
 play out sooner rather than later.  I think the President caresto do
 his job and to see the U.S. to a bright future, but there are times
 when he seems to care more about protecting the Status Quo of
 Exxon-Mobil and GM.
 
 MM
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Americans for Fuel Efficient Cars, Arianna Huffington, and The Detroit Project

2003-01-09 Thread James Slayden

Might just be better to contact her via email:

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

James Slayden


On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Andrew Hoppin wrote:

 Arianna Huffington has put together a project to air hard-hitting ads
 drawing a link between fuel inefficiency and terrorism, with the support
 of
 the Hollywood honchos behind Seinfeld, Pulp Fiction, Good Will Hunting,
 Got
 Milk, etc.
 
 Nice to see this, in part because Arianna Huffington has considerable
 conservative credentials and therefore may get some new constituencies to
 listen to her that would not otherwise listen with an open mind... Now we
 just need to chat with her about BD...
 
 Here's her project:
 http://www.ariannaonline.com/suv/index.html
 
 And here's and article about how network affiliates are refusing to air
 the
 ad.  Hmmm... Do you think network affiliates care about ad dollars from
 car
 companies?
 http://www.knoxnews.com/kns/national/article/0,1406,KNS_350_1657737,00.html
 
 Cheers,
 Andrew
 
 
 The Biofuel Business Development Project
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
 Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
 On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
 N Space Labs, Inc.
 ---
 www.NSpaceLabs.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 212.219.0851 (office)
 646.221.5602 (mobile)
 594 Broadway, #611
 NY, NY 10012
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] bumper stickers- let's make 'em! :)

2003-01-09 Thread James Slayden

Andrew,

If you have been around vehicles burning Biodiesel any amount of time you
begin to recognize the scent, which is very distinct in it's own right.
The fuel itself also has a very distinct scent, which IMHO is wonderful.

No need to change the recognition factor, although it might appeal to
those who like to burn inscense or essential oils.  The only issue with
this is that some people don't like to be blasted with scents they can't
control, and there might be some sensitivities out there to certain
things.


James Slayden

On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Andrew Hoppin wrote:

 I agree wholeheartedly with your thoughts on bumper stickers / PR... I
 like
 boycott OPEC themes... What other cool slogans/ideas do people have? 
 If
 we can throw out brilliant ideas and vote on them, I know some good
 designers, so I'll take it on to get some made up and make them available
 to
 anyone who wants them at cost.
 
 I also like the idea that Yokayo is thinking of putting essential oils
 scents in BD-- might be nice to standardize the scent for B20, B100,
 etc...
 if consumers came to recognize that when they smell pine coming out of
 a
 car it means that's it's running B100, that could be powerful.  I was
 told
 by a friend who used to work at DigiScents that our sense of smell is the
 most poweful scent we have in terms of Mnemonic power.
 
 Cheers,
 Andrew
 
 The Biofuel Business Development Project
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
 Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
 On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
 --
 N Space Labs, Inc.
 www.NSpaceLabs.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 212.219.0851 (office)
 646.221.5602 (mobile)
 594 Broadway, #611
 NY, NY 10012
 
 
 Message: 10
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 20:44:43 -0800
From: murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: bumper stickers for biofuel use?
 
 On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 09:14:34 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
 
 http://www.veggieavenger.com/store/propaganda.shtml
 
 That is Bill's warez.
 
 Dunno, there has to be something more out there.
 
 
 #13 and 16 look ok, outside of the annoying (for these purposes, to me)
 URL.
 8
 and 9 also seem ok I guess.
 
 It's something.  I mean, if you have a simple straightforward statement,
 then it
 makes clear that your car is running on a renewable.  This is somewhat
 less
 obvious with a diesel VW than with an EV1, so maybe it would be of value
 to
 those who do it.  They go to a lot of trouble, some of them, to find or
 make
 biofuels, and one might as well clue people in that the car is running
 something
 special.
 
 With EVs, I know that folks learn a bit just by seeing the cars and
 realizing
 that they exist and work better than has been presented in some forums. 
 If
 you've ever driven an EV1 around a city, you know it's an eye-catcher and
 you'll
 get some thumbs-up and such.  With biofueled cars, might as well make the
 most
 of the chance to educate and market.
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] bumper stickers- let's make 'em! :)

2003-01-09 Thread James Slayden

http://www.oshkoshbygosh.org/

some scathing political humor (posters, bumper stickers and T-shirts
available!!)

On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Hakan Falk wrote:

 
 Andrew,
 
 I think that it is very little to achieve in negative themes like
 boycott
 OPEC. This kind of themes is participation in a very dirty propaganda
 campaign preparing for armed conflicts. The reason is that US is ready to
 go to occupation war to secure the oil deliveries from the two largest
 oil
 reserve countries in the world, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Without securing
 the
 deliveries from them, US will be in serious immediate trouble and a
 disastrous situation one or two decades down the line.
 
 http://energy.saving.nu/biofuels/oildependencies.shtml
 
 The only constructive way to deal with this must be promotion of
 alternatives. Which if successful, would really have a boycotting effect
 and reduce risks of violent conflicts. So I suggest all kind of bumper
 stickers that promote energy conservation, biofuel, etc.
 
 Hakan
 
 At 11:28 AM 1/9/2003 -0500, you wrote:
 I agree wholeheartedly with your thoughts on bumper stickers / PR... I
 like
 boycott OPEC themes... What other cool slogans/ideas do people have? 
 If
 we can throw out brilliant ideas and vote on them, I know some good
 designers, so I'll take it on to get some made up and make them
 available to
 anyone who wants them at cost.
 
 I also like the idea that Yokayo is thinking of putting essential oils
 scents in BD-- might be nice to standardize the scent for B20, B100,
 etc...
 if consumers came to recognize that when they smell pine coming out of
 a
 car it means that's it's running B100, that could be powerful.  I was
 told
 by a friend who used to work at DigiScents that our sense of smell is
 the
 most poweful scent we have in terms of Mnemonic power.
 
 Cheers,
 Andrew
 
 The Biofuel Business Development Project
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
 Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
 On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
 --
 N Space Labs, Inc.
 www.NSpaceLabs.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 212.219.0851 (office)
 646.221.5602 (mobile)
 594 Broadway, #611
 NY, NY 10012
 
 
 Message: 10
 Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 20:44:43 -0800
 From: murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: bumper stickers for biofuel use?
 
 On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 09:14:34 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
 
  http://www.veggieavenger.com/store/propaganda.shtml
  
  That is Bill's warez.
  
  Dunno, there has to be something more out there.
 
 
 #13 and 16 look ok, outside of the annoying (for these purposes, to me)
 URL.
 8
 and 9 also seem ok I guess.
 
 It's something.  I mean, if you have a simple straightforward statement,
 then it
 makes clear that your car is running on a renewable.  This is somewhat
 less
 obvious with a diesel VW than with an EV1, so maybe it would be of value
 to
 those who do it.  They go to a lot of trouble, some of them, to find or
 make
 biofuels, and one might as well clue people in that the car is running
 something
 special.
 
 With EVs, I know that folks learn a bit just by seeing the cars and
 realizing
 that they exist and work better than has been presented in some forums. 
 If
 you've ever driven an EV1 around a city, you know it's an eye-catcher
 and
 you'll
 get some thumbs-up and such.  With biofueled cars, might as well make
 the
 most
 of the chance to educate and market.
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] warning on methanol safety and respirators- biodieselers please read

2003-01-10 Thread James Slayden

hrmm, it looks as if thte reuse period is more ciritical than anything
else; ie. if it goes beyond a few days of non-use then migration starts to
happen.  BTW, did OSHA have any suggestions for alternatives?


James Slayden


On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, girl mark wrote:

 My friend Jeff Biosmell just took a long look at OSHA (US industrial
 safety
 regulator) and other safety regulations regarding handling of methanol.
 Some scary stuff turned up that a lot of us didn't know, and that many
 are
 basing our biodiesel-making practice on. I feel especially responsible
 due
 to all of the people in the classes I've taught, since we focused
 strongly
 on organic vapor cartridge respirator safety and it turned out to be
 dangerously inaccurate information:
 
 It turns out that organic vapor cartridge respirators are useless against
 methanol vapors.
 
 I imagine that this also means that such a respirator will not protect
 you
 from any vapors arising from the agitation and settling portion of the
 biodiesel making process, as methanol will vaporize during this process
 to
 some extent in an open processor (obviously many people use a completely
 enclosed processor to protect themselves from poisonous vapors).
 
 Methanol handling/methoxide mixing can be done in a completely enclosed
 environment as well, rather easily and inexpensively, so don't panic, but
 it's time to get rid of all our open-tank methoxide mixers (a la
 Tickell).  I devised a decent carboy-based non-mechanically-agitated
 system
 to minimise methoxide handling here (look at journeytoforever.org for the
 'methoxide the easy way' description, it's the start of that carboy
 system
 I've got) which can then be plumbed into a closed processor easily. there
 are many other ways that others have accomplished this as well.
 
 
 I have copied some info below (I believe it might be from the 3M site,
 but
 what I saw from more 'neutral' sources was very similar to 3M's
 recommendation not to use organic vapor cartridges for longer than a few
 hours max)
 
 OSHA and the other safety regulators all had the same answer when we
 called
 them: no organic vapor cartridge respirator will protect against methanol
 vapors, only a supplied-air system will do so.
 
 
 Here's some more info, I don't remember which source it's from:
 
 
 Q. Can chemical cartridges be used for more than one shift?
 Organic vapors are removed by the process of adsorption. Weak physical
 forces
 hold the organic vapor on the activated carbon. Since these forces are
 weak,
 the process can be reversed and the organic vapor can be desorbed.
 Desorption
 during storage or nonuse periods can result in the migration of the
 chemical
 through the cartridge. Migration is mainly a concern only for organic
 vapor
 cartridges. Organic vapors adsorbed on an organic vapor cartridge can
 migrate
 through the carbon bed without airflow. Desorption of very volatile
 contaminants can occur after a short period (hours) without use (e.g.,
 overnight). Partial use of the chemical cartridge and subsequent reuse
 could
 potentially expose the user to the contaminant. This is most significant
 for
 the most volatile and poorly retained organic vapors (e.g., boiling point
 
 65∞ C). For organic vapors with a boiling point less than 65∞ C, it
 is
 recommended that the organic vapor cartridge never be used longer than
 one
 shift even if the estimated service life is greater than 8 hours and the
 cartridge is used for only a short time during the shift.
 However, a boiling point of 65 oC is not a fine line between chemicals
 that
 migrate and those that do not. Chemicals with boiling points greater than
 65
 oC can still migrate, but the nonuse period of concern may be longer than
 above. For chemicals with boiling points greater than 65 oC, nonuse or
 storage periods of a few days, like over a weekend, may be the concern.
 For
 these chemicals, (e.g., ethyl acetate, boiling point 77oC), reuse should
 not
 be allowed after two days of nonuse even if the service life estimate
 would
 suggest it. As the volatility decreases migration will become less of a
 concern. Your reuse pattern should still be carefully evaluated even for
 these less volatile chemicals. Chemicals with low volatility will give
 long
 service lives, but even in these situations use should probably not
 extend
 beyond a week or two even if the service life estimate is longer.
 For workers that use their respirators intermittently and perhaps in
 different environments, such as a maintenance worker or inspector, the
 organic vapor cartridges should never be reused.
 The user can conduct desorption studies, mimicking the work conditions of
 use
 and nonuse, to determine acceptable patterns of reuse. The ANSI
 Z88.2-1992
 American National Standard for Respiratory Protection recommends that
 organic
 vapor cartridges be changed daily unless desorption studies support
 longer
 use.
 For more detail on chemical bed migration see:
 Reuse of Organic

Re: [biofuels-biz] Re: cooperating on a veg. oil biofuel project in Calif.

2003-01-14 Thread James Slayden

Len,

I am interested, can you tell me more? 


James Slayden



On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Len Walde wrote:

 I am exploring the establishment of a veg oil recycling/ biofuel project.
 and need someone with the technical and business know-how to provide the
 expertise to set this up. The project would be in the Central Valley of
 Calif.  I need someone with the credentials to provide the on-site
 consulting to help put this together.  Anyone interested?
 
 BTW: There is sufficient $$ avilable in the total project to do this.
 
 Please respond to the list and cc me directly please.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Len Walde, P.E.
 
 Sigma Energy Engineering, Inc.
 Renewable Energy, Process Engineering
 Serving Agriculture, Industry  Commerce
   through Symbiotic Recycling tm
 
   Ph:  925-254-7633
   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [evworld] Re: bumper stickers- let's make 'em! :)

2003-01-26 Thread James Slayden

Cool!! Like Real Californians Eat x.  I really like that
one.  Thanks for the suggestion Murdoch!!  Hey Hakan, you might also want
to include the SVO'rs out there, Real Californian's Use SVO or Real
Californian's Use WVO (acroynm's could be expanded). 

James Slayden

On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, murdoch wrote:

 On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:45:31 +0100, you wrote:
 
 
 Hi,
 
 Suggestions at,
 
 http://energy.saving.nu/stickers/
 
 Hakan
 
 You've been very industrious.  I would suggest for the Californian one
 you add the word Real (e.g. Real Californians Use Biofuel).  I sort
 of like the Supply and Demand Biofuels Now! one and I think The
 Support your local Economy one would be ok if you got rid of the word
 instead (i.e., just Use Biofuels is probably ok, although I
 understand the word instead relates to the picture).
 
 I can see some that I'd consider putting on my vehicle.  Of course,
 one thing that comes up, since this is sort of about marketing and
 getting a message across quickly and the difficulty of staying with
 what you want to say, is that we all have somewhat different ideas or
 agendas, so common ground is not always possible.  But in any case I
 see some that I'd consider.
 
 I wonder if they'd be easy to print out as they are, or if they'd come
 out better to have some online place charge a fee, one could send them
 a picture, and they could send one sticker?  I think that was the
 problem I ran into before... you had to buy a minimum of several
 hundred, and since these have color they'd be even more.  But I have a
 cruddy printer at home, so that affects my ability to project doing
 these myself.
 
 I like the way it worked with putting the URL on the stickers.  It
 gives it a personal touch, where one could see it and have an idea of
 what's up.
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 HGTV Dream Home Giveaway
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Interesting Customer perception note

2003-01-29 Thread James Slayden

Hola,

In talking with someone recently who is interested in purchasing some
biodiesel, and interesting comment came up in our email exchange.  He
indicated that he was more interested in biodiesel made from crude VO than
that made of WVO. I was trying to convince him that the WVO option was
better due to the recyclable nature of the WVO, but he insisted that the
CO sequestering was better of the more recent growing cycle.  I had a
difficult time convincing him that it was the same  but oh well.  He
didn't even care about the GMO feedstock issue!!

I guess what this leaves me with is a customer perception problem of crude
VO vs. WVO based biodiesel.  I am wondering why that perception issue
exists and how to overcome it in talking w/ people who are not biodiesel
geeks.  I know that most of the folks at the Berkley BD Co-op are
religiously pro-WVO BD and will absolutely not put GMO-VO biodiesel in
their vehicles.  So there is the dichotomy in interest of the different
feedstocks for biodiesel.

Any thoughts?

James Slayden



Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Interesting Customer perception note

2003-01-30 Thread James Slayden

Hey Ed,

Out here in Cali there might be sensitivity to it, and on that note it
kinda defeats the purpose of the carbon sequestering and being a
renewable.

I think that securing a known feedstock will be of value for marketing
purposes.  I was thinking along the lines of having different 'grades' of
fuel based on feedstock.  It could be used very effectively in a marketing
campaign.  Something like the following:

B100-M = Mixed feedstock source (could be animal, vegetable, SVO, or WVO, 
 GMO and/or non-GMO)

B100-V = Vegetable based feedstock (GMO or non-GMO, but not Organic)

B100-O = Organic based feedstock

V and O could be used together in the following manner:

B100-VO = Vegetable and Organic feedstock


It would be a good thing to distinguish the product from other producers
as well as maybe trademarking some nifty name for the product.  Although
it is really a 'perception' issue, it is a great marketing tool that can
be used to one's advantage.  It would be difficult to convince people of
the carbon sequestering of animal based BD.  ;-)


James



On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Neoteric Biofuels Inc wrote:

 James: side issue...how do people feel about the fact that much
 biodiesel will be coming from animal fats, especially in warm climates?
 
 Will commercial biodiesel need to be sold as veg and non-veg origin,
 aside from this WVO/SVO source issue, (which is silly, there is no CO
 sequestering advantage to new oil versus oil that spent a week in a
 fryer).
 
 Ed
 
 
 On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 10:43 AM, James Slayden wrote:
 
  Hola,
 
  In talking with someone recently who is interested in purchasing some
  biodiesel, and interesting comment came up in our email exchange.  He
  indicated that he was more interested in biodiesel made from crude VO
  than
  that made of WVO. I was trying to convince him that the WVO option was
  better due to the recyclable nature of the WVO, but he insisted that
  the
  CO sequestering was better of the more recent growing cycle.  I had a
  difficult time convincing him that it was the same  but oh well. 
  He
  didn't even care about the GMO feedstock issue!!
 
  I guess what this leaves me with is a customer perception problem of
  crude
  VO vs. WVO based biodiesel.  I am wondering why that perception issue
  exists and how to overcome it in talking w/ people who are not
  biodiesel
  geeks.  I know that most of the folks at the Berkley BD Co-op are
  religiously pro-WVO BD and will absolutely not put GMO-VO biodiesel in
  their vehicles.  So there is the dichotomy in interest of the different
  feedstocks for biodiesel.
 
  Any thoughts?
 
  James Slayden
 
 
 
  Biofuels at Journey to Forever
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  Biofuel at WebConX
  http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
  List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [evworld] Picture, price of gas above $2.00 for 87 Octane at a Shell station in San Diego

2003-02-18 Thread James Slayden

Just saw Diesel #2 for $2.10 last night!!  Things are right sizing .

On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, murdoch wrote:

 http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/evworld/files/price%20of%20gas%20San%20Dieg
 %20February%2018%2C%202003.JPG
 
 This station is a mile or less from the ocean and is somewhat toward the
 high
 side, though it is far from the highest around.
 
 Interestingly, the 76 station down the street has decoupled its pricing
 a
 little bit, which I've seen happen generally only in times of volatility.
 
 Don't know if members of other groups can read an evworld group file.
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] On the road to cleaner air

2003-02-21 Thread James Slayden

because someones pocket was being lined with greenbacks .  ;-)

Anyone in Boston doing BD that can sell to the school system out there?

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Keith Addison wrote:

 Grist's comment:
 
 Boston is moving to protect its students [from diesel fumes] by
 retrofitting school buses with new filtration  systems that can
 eliminate 90 percent of diesel emissions.  The  Boston project is the
 largest in a New England-wide effort to clean  up school buses; it is
 being paid for out of a $1.4 million fund  created by the U.S. EPA
 with money won in a lawsuit against a  Massachusetts waste-handling
 company.  According to EPA estimates,  the upgrades will eliminate at
 least 540 pounds of diesel particulate  matter, 2,480 pounds of
 smog-causing hydrocarbons, and 17,380 pounds  of carbon monoxide from
 the air every year.
 
 Those numbers are rather minor, aren't they? For that much money? Why
 not just use biodiesel instead?
 
 Keith
 
 
 
 http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/047/west/On_the_road_to_cleaner_air+.shtml
 Boston Globe Online / West Weekly / On the road to cleaner air
 MILFORD
 
 On the road to cleaner air
 
 School vehicles retrofitted to reduce diesel emissions
 
 By Franco Ordonez, Globe Staff Correspondent, 2/16/2003
 
 ne by one, Boston public school buses are making their way out to
 Milford, taken off their smog-producing routes and sent west for a
 few days of detox, of sorts.
 
 They are driven to a secluded part of town, almost hidden behind
 towering granite walls along Quarry Drive, and into a massive,
 hangar-sized garage. Raising the buses on lifts, mechanics dressed in
 blue jumpsuits attach computers and sensors to the engines, then
 discard the mufflers, replacing them with new retro-filtration
 systems that eliminate up to 90 percent of diesel emissions.
 
 It is perhaps an unlikely venue to kick off an effort that
 environmental officials hope eventually ends the prospect of
 students' choking on diesel fumes on their way to school.
 
 The work, being done under the aegis of the Environmental Protection
 Agency, is in response to a February 2002 study conducted by Yale
 University and a Connecticut nonprofit, Environment and Human Heath
 Inc., that looked at children's exposure to diesel exhaust from
 school buses. The EPA has launched a national push for the use of
 pollution control devices and ultra low-sulfur diesel fuel on trucks
 and buses.
 
 The EPA is dedicating $1.4 million to the effort, a sum won in an
 April settlement with Waste Management of Massachusetts. The EPA
 contended that the waste-hauling company mishandled the disposal of
 some home appliances, which released chlorofluorocarbons into the
 atmosphere. The money is funding the largest retrofitting project of
 school buses in New England.
 
 Five months into the project, EPA officials recently celebrated the
 pilot program's continuing success at Southworth-Milton Inc. in
 Milford, a Caterpillar engine distributor, where 100 Boston school
 buses from the school district's biggest bus yard are being outfitted
 with the special diesel particulate filters. All 200 buses at the
 district's Readville yard are currently running on ultra-low sulfur
 fuel.
 
 According to EPA officials, the combination of retrofitting the buses
 and using ultra low-sulfur fuel will eliminate at least 540 pounds of
 diesel particulate matter, 2,480 pounds of smog-causing hydrocarbons,
 and 17,380 tons of carbon monoxide air pollution in Boston each year.
 This, environmental officials say, will make school bus rides much
 safer for children.
 
 ''This allows us to do even better,'' said Richard Jacobs, director
 of transportation for the Boston School Department, who noted that
 the city has already made strides to lower school bus emissions.
 
 The work, the first of its kind in the state, is being targeted to
 some of the most polluted areas of Boston, including Roxbury,
 Dorchester, and Mattapan, where, according to the EPA, asthma rates
 are as much as 178 percent higher than the state average and are the
 leading cause of childhood emergency hospitalizations.
 
 Last September, students of William B. Rogers Middle School in Hyde
 Park began riding the first retrofitted school bus, which traps
 diesel exhaust and turns it into carbon dioxide and water. Since
 then, 17 revamped buses have hit Boston streets.
 
 Nationally, 600,000 school buses carry 24 million children to school
 daily, according to Environment and Human Health Inc. Children
 annually spend 3 billion hours on school buses, considered the safest
 way for children to get to school. But the vast majority of those
 buses run on diesel fuel, which, according to the EPA, emits human
 carcinogens that can aggravate asthma, and even cause lung cancer and
 premature death.
 
 Diesel exhaust contains more than 40 air pollutants, including fine
 particles of carbon and a mixture of toxic gases, according to
 Environment and Human Health.
 
 ''It's so small that 

Re: [biofuels-biz] Smithfield to Convert Hog Waste Into Fuel

2003-02-25 Thread James Slayden

That's just gross.  :(  sustainable my arse.

On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Steve Spence wrote:

 
 
 Smithfield to Convert Hog Waste Into Fuel
 By REUTERS
 
 
 HICAGO, Feb. 21 (Reuters) - Smithfield Foods Inc., the pork producer,
 said today that it would build a $20 million site in Utah that would use
 waste from 500,000 hogs to make biodiesel, a renewable fuel for vehicles.
 
 Biodiesel can be made from any fat including vegetable oil and used
 cooking oil. About 15 million gallons were used in the United States last
 year.
 
 Smithfield said it would be the major partner in BEST BioFuel, a
 partnership that will build the plant at Smithfield-owned swine
 production sites near Milford, Utah.
 
 Livestock waste can be a source of clean, renewable vehicle fuel, said
 Robert F. Urell, a Smithfield senior vice president.
 
 Construction is scheduled to start in April on the new site, pending
 final approval of a conditional use permit and a permit from the Utah
 Department of Environmental Quality.
 
 Smithfield's Utah swine operation produces about one million market hogs
 a year, and the biodiesel project will use the waste from about half of
 those hogs, the company said.
 
 
 
 Steve Spence
 Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
  Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
 http://www.green-trust.org
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Smithfield to Convert Hog Waste Into Fuel

2003-02-25 Thread James Slayden

Len, is this something that you worked on?

On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Len Walde wrote:

 FYI,  from Len
 
 Sigma Energy Engineering, Inc.
 Renewable Energy, Process Engineering
 Serving Agriculture, Industry  Commerce
   through Symbiotic Recycling tm
 
   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Here is a little more info. on the Smithfield story extracted from Waste
 News, some of the how-to:
 
 Va. pork producer to develop $20 million swine waste-biodiesel system
 
 SMITHFIELD, VA. (Feb. 21) -- Smithfield Foods Inc. plans to spend $20
 million developing a system to convert swine waste into biodiesel fuel.
 Smithfield Foods, a processor of fresh pork and other meats, will be the
 major partner in Best Biofuel LLC, a partnership that plans to construct
 the
 project at Smithfield Foods´ Circle Four Farms in southwestern Utah. The
 partnership will begin construction in April, and the facility could be
 producing fuels by October, according to Smithfield Foods.
 
 A collection system will pump waste to a central processing facility
 where
 it will be concentrated. The concentrated liquid then will go into a
 second
 system that produces biogas, which is piped to an enclosed plant where
 thermocatalytic processes convert it into biomethanol.
 
 The biomethanol will be shipped outside of Utah for processing into
 biodiesel, using soybean oil, used cooking oil, animal fat, or other
 oils.
 The biodiesel is a clean-burning, renewable fuel that can also extend the
 life of diesel engines because of improved lubricating action, according
 to
 the company.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Steve Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Biodiesel - Egroups
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Biofuel - Egroups biofuel@egroups.com;
 Alternate Power - Egroups [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 3rdworldenergy
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; BFIC [EMAIL PROTECTED]; biofuels-biz
 biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com; bio-oil [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 BiomassGroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]; EcoPages_Newswire
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; future9 [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 homeenergysolutions [EMAIL PROTECTED]; sustainablenrg
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; vegoil-diesel
 [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 wastewatts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 7:33 AM
 Subject: [biofuels-biz] Smithfield to Convert Hog Waste Into Fuel
 
 
 
 
  Smithfield to Convert Hog Waste Into Fuel
  By REUTERS
 
 
  HICAGO, Feb. 21 (Reuters) - Smithfield Foods Inc., the pork producer,
 said
 today that it would build a $20 million site in Utah that would use waste
 from 500,000 hogs to make biodiesel, a renewable fuel for vehicles.
 
  Biodiesel can be made from any fat including vegetable oil and used
 cooking oil. About 15 million gallons were used in the United States last
 year.
 
  Smithfield said it would be the major partner in BEST BioFuel, a
 partnership that will build the plant at Smithfield-owned swine
 production
 sites near Milford, Utah.
 
  Livestock waste can be a source of clean, renewable vehicle fuel,
 said
 Robert F. Urell, a Smithfield senior vice president.
 
  Construction is scheduled to start in April on the new site, pending
 final
 approval of a conditional use permit and a permit from the Utah
 Department
 of Environmental Quality.
 
  Smithfield's Utah swine operation produces about one million market
 hogs a
 year, and the biodiesel project will use the waste from about half of
 those
 hogs, the company said.
 
 
 
  Steve Spence
  Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
   Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
  http://www.green-trust.org
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
  Biofuels at Journey to Forever
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  Biofuel at WebConX
  http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
  List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Smithfield to Convert Hog Waste Into Fuel

2003-02-26 Thread James Slayden

actually the conversion of aniaml fats following slaughter does disgust
me.  Probably because I am a veggie.  =)

On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Steve Spence wrote:

 why is converting manure to methane gas gross? We used to do it my
 farming
 days. It's healthier than spreading the liquid stuff on the fields. You
 spread the dry stuff leftover and plow it under for fertilizer.
 
 
 Steve Spence
 Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
  Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
 http://www.green-trust.org
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: James Slayden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuels-biz biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:56 PM
 Subject: Re: [biofuels-biz] Smithfield to Convert Hog Waste Into Fuel
 
 
  That's just gross.  :(  sustainable my arse.
 
  On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Steve Spence wrote:
 
  
  
   Smithfield to Convert Hog Waste Into Fuel
   By REUTERS
  
  
   HICAGO, Feb. 21 (Reuters) - Smithfield Foods Inc., the pork producer,
   said today that it would build a $20 million site in Utah that would
 use
   waste from 500,000 hogs to make biodiesel, a renewable fuel for
 vehicles.
  
   Biodiesel can be made from any fat including vegetable oil and used
   cooking oil. About 15 million gallons were used in the United States
 last
   year.
  
   Smithfield said it would be the major partner in BEST BioFuel, a
   partnership that will build the plant at Smithfield-owned swine
   production sites near Milford, Utah.
  
   Livestock waste can be a source of clean, renewable vehicle fuel,
 said
   Robert F. Urell, a Smithfield senior vice president.
  
   Construction is scheduled to start in April on the new site, pending
   final approval of a conditional use permit and a permit from the Utah
   Department of Environmental Quality.
  
   Smithfield's Utah swine operation produces about one million market
 hogs
   a year, and the biodiesel project will use the waste from about half
 of
   those hogs, the company said.
  
  
  
   Steve Spence
   Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
   http://www.green-trust.org
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
   ADVERTISEMENT
  
   Biofuels at Journey to Forever
   http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
   Biofuel at WebConX
   http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
   List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
   http://archive.nnytech.net/
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
  
 
 
  Biofuels at Journey to Forever
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  Biofuel at WebConX
  http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
  List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
New Yahoo! Mail Plus. More flexibility. More control. More power.
Get POP access, more storage, more filters, and more.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Hcb0iA/P.iFAA/46VHAA/9bTolB/TM
-~-

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] Stainless steel drums

2003-02-26 Thread James Slayden

anyone know of refurb or salvage 85 or 110 drums.  55's are as common as
dirt, but the larger sizes are somewhat more difficult to find.
SF bay only please.  skolnik is in Chicago I believe.

Thnx,

James Slayden

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Keith Addison wrote:

 Forwards from the Distillers list:
 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: waljaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:13:34 -
 Subject: [Distillers] SS drums in the U.S.
 
 Came across a site specializing in steel drums (including salvage
 drums and barrels) which would be suitable for distillers -
 http://www.skolnik.com
 
 Wal
 
 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: Robert Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 07:49:29 +1300
 Subject: [Distillers] Stainless Drums
 
 For those residing in Oz, The Visypack plant in Brisbane produces a
 food-grade 60 litre stainless steel drum. The version that I was
 interested in was described as having a full open lid, retained with a
 clamp and nitrile (alcohol impervious) gasket. While I haven't seen one
 in the flesh, it sounds ideal for a boiler.
 At the time I made enquiries (Dec '02), Visypack's address was: Oxford
 St, Bulimda, but they were soon to shift to: 40 Ingham Place, Hammett.
 The contact person is a Jim Klaer (pronounced clear),
 Phone no. in Brisbane: 3890 9777. Price: Aus$154.66.
 For those (like me) residing in NZ, my original enquiries were through
 Visypack NZ, but with freight etc. the price became prohibitive. At this
 stage, I'm waiting for someone flying to Brisbane to bring me one back
 as unaccompanied baggage!
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
New Yahoo! Mail Plus. More flexibility. More control. More power.
Get POP access, more storage, more filters, and more.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Hcb0iA/P.iFAA/46VHAA/9bTolB/TM
-~-

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] finally, a James Woolsey interview.... covers more than one proposed alt-fuel-bio-fuel solution

2003-03-11 Thread James Slayden

WOW!  There is a market for FFA's ..

http://www.changingworldtech.com/techfr.htm

I would have never guessed.  Now how to sell it in bulk following glyc
seperation.  

James Slayden


On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, murdoch wrote:

 http://www.evworld.com/databases/storybuilder.cfm?storyid=507
 
 I wonder what fuel they were talking about here:
 
 In addition to ethanol production, he also sees promise in a new
 technology called Thermo-Depolymerization. In partnership with Conagra
 Foods, a large food processor in the United States, a small company
 called
 Changing World Technologies, has installed a system that will take
 agriculture waste from a turkey processing plant in Carthage, Missouri
 and
 convert it into a short-chain hydrocarbon gas similar to natural gas and
 a
 high-grade bio-diesel fuel, among other bi-products.
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Re: [berkeleybiodiesel] [biofuel] crosspost schoolbus conversions (fwd)

2003-03-19 Thread James Slayden

Just crossposting.

James Slayden

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:28:31 -0800 (PST)
From: James Slayden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [berkeleybiodiesel] [biofuel] crosspost schoolbus conversions
(fwd)

So, here is what I found out.  The Certificate to haul waste grease (oil)
is $100 per year for the 1st vehicle, and $75 for every vehicle there
after.  The certificate is annually renewable in January and you get both
a certificate paper and a sticker for the vehicle. No hazzardous
materials
training is necessary. 

So, basically it's only if ya get caught oil diving where this would
really be an issue.  I'm sure that no one is going to stop ya and see
what's in the 5 gal pails (or other container).  It's more of a
comfortability issue with those people who get nervous with legal issues.

But, it might be good to get it to be on the safe side.


James Slayden


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/46VHAA/9bTolB/TM
-~-

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Power plant uses coal, grass

2003-07-11 Thread James Slayden

There was a pilot project several years back that was in a midwestern
state with good emission reductions.  There also is a company that makes
switchgrsss pellets for pellet stoves, just can't find it now.

James Slayden

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, murdoch wrote:

 http://www.augustachronicle.com/stories/070603/met_energy3.shtml
 
 Interesting comments about switchgrass, project results.  Also, the
 comments of
 the International Paper person were interesting to me.
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/sOykFB/k9VGAA/ySSFAA/9bTolB/TM
-~-

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuels-biz] Biodiesel Production Units

2003-07-18 Thread James Slayden

Here is another one:

http://www.superiorprocesstech.com/

It really depends on what your looking for.  Small, mid, or large
production.  As what's been said before, a small production unit can be
cheaply made, by you.  Most of the mid solutions that are out seem to be
skid or container types up to ~500K.  And the large production facilities
are using industrial plant builders at a very high cost.  Todd will be
putting out a whitepaper on a small 2 stage acid/base plant sometime in
the near future on JTF.  I believe that smallish (ie. under 1000gpd)
highly distributed plants are the way to go. Something akin to a city or
area plant depending on feedstock availability.

The scaling of BD production to a certain point really does simplify
things, all the way from feedstock sourcing, production, to co-products
reclaimation, and wastewater recycling.  But as a point to show here, I
make single stage batchs in 5 gal buckets 20 gal's at a time (looking to
build a 55 gal drum processor soon).  From that experience I would say
that if your going to do over 10 gal's at a time, it's best to go with a
larger processor, wash tank, etc system.  I kinda came up with a formula
for doubling and moving up to a larger processor and various gallon
intervals.  Kinda like 10 gal = 5 gal bucket processing, 20-40 gal = 35 -
55 gal drum processing, 100 gal, 200 gal, 400 gal, 1000 gal, 2000
gal, etc ..  You get the picture.


James Slayden

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Winny De Schryver wrote:

 Look at www.energea.at and www.biodieseltechnologies.com
 also superior technologies in the US is selling plants
 
 Winny
 
  -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
  Van: cheneyvii [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Verzonden: donderdag 17 juli 2003 9:18
  Aan: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
  Onderwerp: [biofuels-biz] Biodiesel Production Units
 
 
  I would like information on Biodiesel production units.
 
 
 
 
  Biofuels at Journey to Forever
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  Biofuel at WebConX
  http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
  List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges  Refill Kits for Your Epson at Myinks.com
Free shipping on orders $50 or more to the US and Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5705lp=home/epson.asp
http://us.click.yahoo.com/brYXfA/_xWGAA/ySSFAA/9bTolB/TM
-~-

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Brine wash to dry WVO?

2003-08-11 Thread James Slayden

I think this is done on a commercial scale to decrease FFA's crude
VO.  Anyone have some insite into that?

James Slayden

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Keith Addison wrote:

 Sounds like an interesting idea, anybody tried it, or heard of it being
 done?
 
 Tim wrote to me direct, he's not a list member, though I suggested he
 join, so you might cc any responses to him.
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 
 From: Tim Desson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: biodiesel
 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:07:43 +
 
 Dear Keith,
 just been reading about the fantastic biodiesel stuff on the web!
 I'm going to give the foolproof process a go (when my broken collar
 bone mends!)
 I was wondering if a brine wash has been tried to dry the WVO before
 transesterification (I'm a research chemist, and this is often done
 on wet solutions of organic solvents to dry them, the water in the
 fat gets salted out )
 I look forward to hearing from you
 Tim Desson
 Wokingham, UK
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada. 
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/9bTolB/TM
-~-

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Need A Name Contest

2004-08-23 Thread James Slayden



GreaseWerks B100  :)

James

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 As I have referred to in the past, Homestead Inc. and CoopPlus of Western
 Massachusetts are joining forces to create a new small commercial sized
 biodiesel
 processor in Western Massachusetts. Anticipated construction date is by
 or
 before January of 2005.
 
 One thing that's a little stuck right now is a PRODUCT NAME. I'm the only
 one
 who likes my previous product name, Yellow brand PREMIUM Biodiesel, so we
 have to look elsewhere. Here's an offer: if anyone can help us find a new
 product
 name for our biodiesel, made from 100% recycled vegetable oil, collected
 from
 the local generators and sold to the local users as 100% roadworthy
 biodiesel, there is a reward for you!
 
 The person who suggests the best name for our biodiesel, in our opinion,
 for
 our new main product of B-100, will receive ten (10) certificates, each
 good
 for five gallons of B-100 biodiesel! This will require the name be
 registrable
 for our company.These certificates normally are sold for $10.00 each, and
 will
 be worth even more in the near future. Biodiesel is f.o.b. the factory,
 and
 the certificates are redeemable after the factory opens for normal
 production,
 expected by early 2006.
 
 Send to the list here, or send to me directly, its your choice. I'll
 publish
 the name when it is chosen in the next 30 to 45 days, and name the lucky
 winner of all of that biodiesel! Note that if the corporate venture does
 its own
 name inventing, there will be no web based winner.   But give it a few
 minutes
 thought, the winner could be you!
 
 
 Tom Leue
 
 
 
 
 -
 Homestead Inc.
 www.yellowbiodiesel.com
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 [rand=423018715]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
  *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
  *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: take down my articles from journeytoforever.org was Re: [biofuel] Re: Love Those

2004-08-25 Thread James Slayden

blah, blah, blah, blah

Can you two take this offline?  Just going over this on the list in my 
book is spam.

BTW, I utmost respect for both of you.  Just this kind of list infighting 
should be between poster and moderator, not for the general public.

Thanks,

James

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Keith Addison wrote:

 I'm reversing the order of messages here, so that it is obvious to
 everyone
 what Im talking about in my reply. so the latest is at the bottom...
 
 Mark
 
 Something else that's generally accepted as good Netiquette and is
 required on many lists is in-line responses. Eg, There's no way to
 build a threaded discussion with top-posting. Top-posting severely
 inhibits others from understanding the conversation, because the
 context of the conversation is out of order, as in broken. Same
 thing with bottom posting. But I see your point - if you'd written
 this as an inline response it would have looked nonsensical. Which it
 is.
 
 All too predictable, and indeed predicted, sad to say, though I did
 hope for better. But I didn't hold my breath either.
 
 Same as last time, eh? - with that disgraceful episode at the
 Biodiesel list a few months ago. You didn't want a flame war, while
 pouring gasoline on it. I told you this, a couple of times, among
 several other things:
 
 Let me try it again, probably no use but still: If you want a
 fight, you can count me out, I'm not interested. If you'd prefer
 peace, great, so would I. But that means even-handedness.
 
 You weren't interested. You twisted a LOT of things right out of
 shape, distorted a lot of things, and said a lot of things that were
 blatantly untrue. Confronted with incontrovertible evidence that it
 was untrue, you ignored it and pressed ahead anyway.
 
 Now you've posted this stuff at the Biodiesel list, and to the
 Wastewatts group, and heaven knows where else. Why would that be I
 wonder? Trying to cause max damage? Or to drum up support on
 dysfunctional lists where all the trolls can have a field day? As
 they now are. LOL! Are you to be judged by the support you're
 getting? You know damn' well Dana Linscott's telling a pack of
 malicious lies about the Biofuel list and Journey to Forever, twice
 now, are you going to counter him? So is Jerry Dycus. Want me to
 prove it?
 
 Anyway, sorry, NOT the same as last time. There are standards here
 and they're upheld.
 
 See below.
 
 
 **
  --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, bioveging [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
All this came about by following your recommendations and hints,
 G Mark.
 (snip)
  
  
  
 
 I then wrote:
  Hey, thank you very much for the kind words, but it's not just me who
  designed that system by any stretch. Lots and lots of people's ideas
  have been creeping into the water heater processor design and helping
  it evolve, and that's why you should also add to it by posting your
  own photos in the veggieavenger.com open-source biodiesel equipment
  forum, to add to the general knowledge (or even post descriptions if
  you dont have a camera).
   Thanks for the positive feedback anyway, even though it should go
 out
  to everybody who contributed! I really hope the other people who have
  contributed realise how much their contributions have helped
  newcomers.
  
  mark
 **
 then Keith Addison wrote:
 
 At 10:27 PM 8/23/2004 +, you wrote:
  --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Mark
  
  You're not a newcomer to Internet forums, and I'm sure you know that
  it's very bad Netiquette to post messages to one forum promoting
  another. That's generally accepted as a no-no and the online
  resources on Netiquette are quite clear about it. There are quite a
  few lists where doing that will get you instantly banned. At the very
  least you should ask first.
  
  You've now done this here repeatedly. Of course it's okay to point to
  a particular item at another forum if it's of relevance to a
  discussion, but this is outright promotion, which is not okay at all.
  Not only that, you've more or less demanded that I put the thing on
  Journey to Forever. You'd already asked me that three times offlist
  and didn't get a response. Quite obviously that WAS the response -
  you think I didn't notice or something? Three times? I'm not exactly
  famous for not noticing such things. So you bring it onlist?
  
   Keith, please add to my Appleseed article that you have posted on
   journeytoforever, the link to the original material that it's
 derived
  from:
   www.veggieavenger.com/media or at least a link to the Appleseed
  thread on
   veggieavenger.com/media . I'm planning on cleaning up that thread
  pretty
   soon here so it'll be more legible.
  
  Anyway, it didn't come from veggieavenger.com, it came from a piece
  you wrote for Homepower, or so you said at the time. And also from
  your 'zine. Whatever, I've my own good reasons for not doing so and
  I'm not about to defend them to you, nor to 

Re: [biofuel] Green-trust.org is back online!

2004-08-25 Thread James Slayden


Congrats Steve!!

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Steve Spence wrote:

 After much angst and wrangling, Green-trust.org (http://www.green-
 trust.org) is back online, with a new interface, new features (Blog,
 encyclopedia, discussion boards, link exchange, and much more), and
 a new Host (ISP)! All the old content is archived, and major
 sections of it is being re-written, and will be posted back online.
 If you have requests for particular articles, suggestions, or want
 to help with editing (or article writing), please contact me at
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Steve Spence
 
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 [rand=145313763]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
  *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
  *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [biofuel] Drano is drano all right.

2004-03-30 Thread James Slayden

Red Devil is available at most any Safeway, Home Depot, or Osh 

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Michael Lendzian wrote:

 I get Red devil Lye down the street from my house at Kroger's.
 
 Yes- that's right- the supermarket!
 
 -Michael
 
 Michael Patrick Lendzian
 Information Technology Manager
 Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
 Savannah, GA 31411
 912.598.2330
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
  *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
  *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] The Myth of the 3,000 Mile Oil Change

2004-04-19 Thread James Slayden

Hrmm, I don't seem to get around to it until ~8,000 miles or so.  Seems 
fine so far and I have 90K on my engine.

James Slayden

On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Keith Addison wrote:

 Any opinions on this?
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 
 From: The Motor Oil Bible  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: The Motor Oil Bible Update April 16, 2004
 
 Hello,
 
 This message is going out to everyone who ever purchased The Motor 
 Oil Bible or downloaded the free version (with the exception of 
 anyone whoever requested to be removed from my mailing list - I 
 respect everyone's right to opt-out).
 
 The Motor Oil Bible is now well over 150 pages and is now completely 
 F,R,E,E (at least the electronic version is). There is no longer a 
 free trial version and a full version. The FULL version is now 
 provided for download at no charge.
 
 I feel very strongly that everyone out there needs to read this book 
 as there is much environmental pollution and economic waste occuring 
 as a result of the major oil companies' insistence on perpetuating 
 The Myth of the 3,000 Mile Oil Change.
 
 So, I am no longer charging for the electonic version of my book.
 
 To those of you who paid for the electronic version in the past, I 
 hope you don't feel like you got the short end of the stick.
 
 Previous to now, I was not in a financial position to offer the book 
 without charge. Now I am, so that's what I'm doing.
 
 The reason that I am emailing you is because many of you have 
 indicated to me in the past that you knew people you thought should 
 read this information. However, many of them might not have been 
 willing to PAY for the information.
 
 Now that the book is downloadable without charge, you may have 
 friends or relatives who would be interested in reading the book.
 
 The only semi requirement I have is that people wanting to make 
 sure they are downloading the latest edition of the book will want 
 to register for an account on TheMotorOilSite.com discussion board. 
 I do not charge for these memberships either.
 
 Technically, to get the book, they don't HAVE to register since 
 anyone is welcome to send the book to a friend as an email 
 attachment or put it up on their website server for download. The 
 only potential issue is that the file may become outdated over time. 
 If they register for an account on TheMotorOilSite.com they can be 
 sure that the file they download is the latest copy available.
 
 At any rate, the latest iteration of the book had some revision as 
 of September of 2002 and had technical specification updates as of 
 August of 2003. Hopefully, there will be some more updates coming 
 very soon and all registered members of TheMotorOilSite.com will 
 receive notification when that update occurs.
 
 To download the latest version, please go to
 
 http://TheMotorOilSite.com and register for an account.
 
 Then, please notify anyone you feel might have interest in this 
 material that the book is now available at no cost. People need to 
 know that they are basically being lied to and it is costing them a 
 great deal of time, money and aggrevation.
 
 Thank you,
 
 Mike Kaufman
 Motor Oil Bible Author
 http://Motor-Oil-Bible.com
 http://TheMotorOilSite.com
 
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: stanadyne pump compatability

2004-06-15 Thread James Slayden

Hey Keith,

Is there any possible way to have solution suggestions for the injectors, 
like you have for the causes?  It would be a nice checklist.  :)

James

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Keith Addison wrote:

 Those pumps die anyway. Biodiesel isn't a problem with them. The
 Diesel Fuel Injection Equipment Manufacturers (Delphi, Stanadyne,
 Denso, Bosch) still make cautious noises about biodiesel but they're
 supportive nonetheless. They insist on standard-spec fuel at minimum,
 but it's easy to make standard-spec biodiesel or better. Here's their
 statement on biodiesel quality:
 Summary -- html
 http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_FIEM.html
 Full document -- Acrobat file, 104kb
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/FIEM.pdf
 
 For SVO/WVO the same reservations apply to Stanadyne pumps as to
 Lucas-CAV - rotary pumps, not good.
 
 Elsbett says: We do not suggest to modify engines equipped with
 distributor-type
 injection pumps manufactured by Delphi, Lucas, CAV, Stanadyne and
 Roto-Diesel.
 
 There's more about this at Darren Hill's site:
 http://www.vegburner.co.uk/suitability.htm
 Vegburner
 
 Meanwhile there've been furious denials from Greasel and probably
 others - nothing wrong with rotary pumps and SVO, they say, it's just
 rumors, misinformation. Ho-hum.
 
 Ed Beggs of Neoteric reported an initial failure (old pump) and no
 problems with the rebuilt replacement: Starting into a project with
 an old highly worn pump - well, sure,
 anything can happen... these pumps fail daily to begin with, on
 diesel fuel... Throw in some inferior WVO that should have been made
 into biodiesel, and you are adding to the potential for problems,
 IMO. On the other hand, with a good pump in good shape, and good WVO
 or SVO, well heated and free of water and contaminants.. no problems.
 
 Others agree with that, though it's also said that the Stanadyne
 pumps can't take too much heat either, maybe 180 deg F max. Not too
 little, not too much.
 
 It's the same with the Lucas - it can be done but it has to be done
 well, and there's still a shortage of long-term results, there are
 some, but not enough.
 
 Once again, it's the difference between biodiesel and SVO. Biodiesel
 - any diesel will do. SVO - maybe any diesel, but there's a lot more
 to consider, if you're just going to chuck it in and go then be
 prepared for problems.
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 
 to elaborate on that a little (since I own one of these vehicles)
 
 Elsbett has recommended not converting vehicles equipped with
 Stanodyne pumps to SVO. (this came from Aleksander Noack
 directly, not sure if it's on their website or not)
 
 we had a LOT of failures (ie 7 or 8 now?) with these pumps (on
 Fords and Chevy trucks) in the Bay Area on SVO, none on
 biodiesel. Of course lots of other people have also run them
 successfully on SVO, again, no pump failures reported anywhere
 on biodiesel.
 
  It looks like the failures in our area were mostly on vehicles
 which weren't getting sufficient heating on the WVO side. These
 folks mostly ran homemade or experimental conversions, and
 the failures (sized pump) occured quite early in the conversion's
 life. The several of these cases that I looked into, didn't do
 adequate temperature monitoring , so it is possible that the
 temps weren't up to par. In any case it seems a strong case to
 be extra careful with SVO in these vehicles.
 
 One of them seized his pump and then seized the newly rebuilt
 replacement almost immediately. When he called the rebuild
 company about it the second time, they asked if he was using
 biodiesel- they'd apparently gotten a few back from various
 people already. I imagine that the SVO'ers who were trying to get
 the company to accept their seized pumps as cores were
 probably doing what my friends did- and probably weren't quite
 straight with the co. as to what fuel they were using, and had
 probably told that company it was biodiesel (since that sounds
 less bad than hacking into your fuel system, from a fuel injection
 equipment manufacturers' perspective.
 
 
 --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
   Not recommended for SVO/WVO use, fine with biodiesel.
  
   Best
  
   Keith
  
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   

 Best I can tell the pump in my vehicle is a distributor type
 Stanadyne pump. If I am wrong on that point, someone
 please correct
 me!
   
   
   From what I remember, the fuel injector pump on the 5.7,
 6.2 and 6.5
   is a Roosa Master.  I don't know why distributor type fuel
 injection
   pumps would have problems on biodiesel, though I imagine
 the close
   tolerances of such a device might cause problems with WVO
 after it had
   cooled down.  But that would simply entail running biodiesel
 or standard
   diesel through the pump for a few moments to clean out the
 hot WVO
   before shutting down, would it not?
   
   Once, when I was seriously looking at a 6.5 turbo diesel, I
   contacted Ed Beggs about a 

Re: [biofuel] Re: Two Stage process -- design to add methoxide

2004-06-15 Thread James Slayden

and on that note, does anyone know where I can get a vent fiting for 
non-vented carboys?

James

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Brian wrote:

 Mark,
 
 A while back, you had mentioned being able to find plumbing fittings
 to use a carboy for adding methoxide.  To this point, I have been
 unable to find anyplace that sells carboy caps which connect to
 plumbing fittings.  Do you have any further information on where
 these can be found? 
 
 Thanks for all you do here.
 
 Brian
 
 --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, girl_mark_fire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Look at the processor plans at:
  http://www.journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_processor.html . The
  APpleseed reactor and many others have the type of pump-mixed
 system
  you're describing. The way methoxide is added, is that a second
 tank
  (a 5-gallon jerrican in my case) is used, which the methoxide is
 mixed
  up in. Then it's plumbed inline with the intake of the pump. When
 y0u
  add methoxide, you just open a valve, and hopefully the pump will
 draw
  in the methoxide into the oil stream.
 
  The other devices for this sort of thing include venturis (which
 would
  make this work a little better than the current APpleseed
 arrangement
  does) and various agricultural sprayer equipment 'injectors' for
  adding pesticides to a stream of liquid. I don't have direct
  experience with these. Venturis and other inline chemcal injection
  devices are found at the Northern Tool, tractor Supply Company,
  various local agricultural/ranch/farm supply places, www.
  surpluscenter.com, and McMaster-Carr (McMaster.com I think).
 
  Let us know what you find and how it works for you.
 
  Mark
 
  --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Angus Scown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I have just started construction of my processer.  I have started
  pretty
   simply by building a cone bottomed 44 gallon (200 litre)  drum. 
 I
  was
   thinking of using a pump to do the mixing as it seems very simple
 to
   design/install and with clear pipes in sections to monitor the
  colour. 
  
   My construction helper (he who welds) and I got talking about the
  addition of
   the Methanol , Acid, Methoxide.  He got me thinking about some
 sort
  of inline
   'adder' so I could drip my chosen substance in to the pump mixing
  lines. 
   This would help me get a good mix.  Has anyone else got
 experience
  with this
   type of design.  Not knowing too much about pumps etc what sort
 of
  device
   could I look for/make for adding the substance 'mid flow'.
  
   Many thanks.
  
   Angus
   --
   __
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://maroochypermaculture.org.au
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 [rand=860508098]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
  *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
  *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Two Stage process -- design to add methoxide

2004-06-15 Thread James Slayden

HDPE plastic

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, linden duncan wrote:

 James,
 
 Is your carboy made of glass, plastic or metal?
 
 Linden
 
 
 James Slayden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 and on that note, does anyone know where I can get a vent fiting for
 non-vented carboys?
 
 James
 
 On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Brian wrote:
 
  Mark,
 
  A while back, you had mentioned being able to find plumbing fittings
  to use a carboy for adding methoxide.  To this point, I have been
  unable to find anyplace that sells carboy caps which connect to
  plumbing fittings.  Do you have any further information on where
  these can be found?
 
  Thanks for all you do here.
 
  Brian
 
  --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, girl_mark_fire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Look at the processor plans at:
   http://www.journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_processor.html . The
   APpleseed reactor and many others have the type of pump-mixed
  system
   you're describing. The way methoxide is added, is that a second
  tank
   (a 5-gallon jerrican in my case) is used, which the methoxide is
  mixed
   up in. Then it's plumbed inline with the intake of the pump. When
  y0u
   add methoxide, you just open a valve, and hopefully the pump will
  draw
   in the methoxide into the oil stream.
  
   The other devices for this sort of thing include venturis (which
  would
   make this work a little better than the current APpleseed
  arrangement
   does) and various agricultural sprayer equipment 'injectors' for
   adding pesticides to a stream of liquid. I don't have direct
   experience with these. Venturis and other inline chemcal injection
   devices are found at the Northern Tool, tractor Supply Company,
   various local agricultural/ranch/farm supply places, www.
   surpluscenter.com, and McMaster-Carr (McMaster.com I think).
  
   Let us know what you find and how it works for you.
  
   Mark
  
   --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Angus Scown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just started construction of my processer.  I have started
   pretty
simply by building a cone bottomed 44 gallon (200 litre)  drum.
  I
   was
thinking of using a pump to do the mixing as it seems very simple
  to
design/install and with clear pipes in sections to monitor the
   colour.
   
My construction helper (he who welds) and I got talking about the
   addition of
the Methanol , Acid, Methoxide.  He got me thinking about some
  sort
   of inline
'adder' so I could drip my chosen substance in to the pump mixing
   lines.
This would help me get a good mix.  Has anyone else got
  experience
   with this
type of design.  Not knowing too much about pumps etc what sort
  of
   device
could I look for/make for adding the substance 'mid flow'.
   
Many thanks.
   
Angus
--
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://maroochypermaculture.org.au
 
 
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Biofuels list archives:
  http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
  Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
  ADVERTISEMENT
  click here
  [rand=860508098]
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
   *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
   *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
 Service.
 
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
 
 
 -
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 

 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Friends.  Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 [rand=763018538]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
  *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
  *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[2]: [biofuel] Re: Two Stage process -- design to add methoxide

2004-06-15 Thread James Slayden

sounds interesting, I will ask Ken where he gets this brewing supplies.  
Thanks.

James

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Gustl Steiner-Zehender wrote:

 Hallo James,
 
 Try  someplace  which  sells homebrewing supplies.  Rubber bung with a
 hole  in  the  middle  to  which you can attach a small plastic device
 which will allow gasses to escape.  ??
 
 Happy Happy,
 
 Gustl
 
 Tuesday, 15 June, 2004, 01:26:36, you wrote:
 
 JS and on that note, does anyone know where I can get a vent fiting for 
 JS non-vented carboys?
 
 JS James
 
 
 
 -- 
 Je mehr wir haben, desto mehr fordert Gott von uns.
 Mitglied-Team AMIGA
 ICQ: 22211253-Gustli
 
 The safest road to Hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope, 
 soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, 
 without signposts.  
 C. S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters
 
 Es gibt Wahrheiten, die so sehr auf der Stra§e liegen, 
 da§ sie gerade deshalb von der gewšhnlichen Welt nicht 
 gesehen oder wenigstens nicht erkannt werden.
 
 Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't
 hear the music.  
 George Carlin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Anybody there?

2004-06-24 Thread James Slayden

I am gett'in the list email .

James

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Ken Provost wrote:

 I'm just waitin for 300 messages to show up --
 but they haven't yet. I actually had a virus
 attack over the weekend -- watched my emails
 disappear upwards before my very eyes, just
 like a spy film (y'know, Clear  Present Danger,
 where one guys tryin to delete faster than the
 other guy can save off -- SPOOKY, and that's on
 a MAC!)
 
 Anyway, are we back to normal yet? Will we ever be
 normal AGAIN?:-) -K
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 [rand=637714214]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
  *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
  *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Rice husk ash

2004-07-27 Thread James Slayden

Are the rice hulls the same as the germ ?


James

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Heidi Wordhouse-Dykema wrote:

 
   it'll be sent to a mill. Products are rice and bran, husks are waste.
   Should be FFTA. Unless they've found some by-product use for them
   there.
 
 
 Some straw-bale builders are using (unburnt!) rice husks for
 ceiling/attic
 insulation.  It blows in like cellulose, and the high silica content
 makes
 it fairly fire-retardant.  I've heard somebody mixed hulls into their
 'mud'
 (earthen plaster) to seal the strawbale walls.For those who are
 interested, raw wool is another great insulator for ceilings/attics,but
 it
 doesn't blow in.
 
 US rice mills will generally want to give you large quantities (a dump
 truck full) but don't like to mess with smaller quantities when it comes
 to
 hulls.
 
 ...and that's more eco-trivia to fill your noggin...
 HeidiWD
 
 
 To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
 we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only
 unpatriotic and servile, but also treasonable to the American public.
 - Theodore Roosevelt, 1918
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 [rand=121297097]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
  *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
  *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Rice husk ash

2004-07-28 Thread James Slayden

Thanks Keith,

I was soft bounced and missed some postings.

James

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Keith Addison wrote:

 Are the rice hulls the same as the germ ?
 
 No. From previous:
 
 Uhh, maybe I don't know what rice husks are -- I've always
 assumed they're some part of the plant that encases the
 rice grain,
 
 That's what they are. Aka rice hulls.
 
 and that I never see in my rice straw.
 
 No, you wouldn't. I doubt the rice is dehusked at the farm-level,
 it'll be sent to a mill. Products are rice and bran, husks are
 waste. Should be FFTA. Unless they've found some by-product use for
 them there.
 
 The germ is part of the seed, not part of its casing. Usually it is
 removed in polishing the rice seed (white rice, as opposed to brown
 rice, which still has the germ), in which case it's found in the
 bran. It is the germ that gives the bran its high oil content. Which
 we've discussed here before with you.
 
 James
 
 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Heidi Wordhouse-Dykema wrote:
 
  
 it'll be sent to a mill. Products are rice and bran, husks are
 waste.
 Should be FFTA. Unless they've found some by-product use for them
 there.
  
  
   Some straw-bale builders are using (unburnt!) rice husks for
   ceiling/attic
   insulation.  It blows in like cellulose, and the high silica content
   makes
   it fairly fire-retardant.  I've heard somebody mixed hulls into their
   'mud'
   (earthen plaster) to seal the strawbale walls.For those who are
   interested, raw wool is another great insulator for
 ceilings/attics,but
   it
   doesn't blow in.
  
   US rice mills will generally want to give you large quantities (a
 dump
   truck full) but don't like to mess with smaller quantities when it
 comes
   to
   hulls.
  
 
 If you're going to use it for building, a dump-truck might not be too
 much. Ashing it brings it down to about a quarter the volume.
 
 If you're more interested in smaller stuff than houses, like stoves,
 the mills will probably let you take whatever you want if you go
 there.
 
   ...and that's more eco-trivia to fill your noggin...
 
 Thankyou Heidi.
 
 regards
 
 Keith
 
 
   HeidiWD
  
  
   To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or
 that
   we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only
   unpatriotic and servile, but also treasonable to the American
 public.
   - Theodore Roosevelt, 1918
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 [rand=941045787]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
  *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
  *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Lumpy BD

2004-07-30 Thread James Slayden

Keith, just a question.  How are you doing the stir washing?  Using the 
pump, or actually using a stirring mechanism?  I saw the thread on what 
Todd was saying about pump washing and was interesed on if and how people 
are doing that.

Thanks,

James

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Keith Addison wrote:

snip

 I find that can get a bit gruelling, though it's a useful option to
 have. In moving house etc recently we didn't make any biod for a few
 weeks, and ended up with much more WVO than we like to have on hand,
 so I've been processing it steadily, one batch after another. But
 instead of having a batch in the settling tank and doing a second
 batch straight away to settle in the processor, I just have one batch
 in the settling tank. As soon as one of the two washing tanks is
 free, I transfer the (now settled) biod from the settling tank to
 that wash-tank, then process a new batch and settle it in the
 now-empty settling tank. This new batch will end up in the other
 wash-tank. This does a batch every two or three days, which is fast
 enough, and it's a lot more relaxed than handling two batches at
 once. This makes more use of the two wash-tanks than of the settling
 tank (it could just settle in the processor), but it staggers it
 nicely, so you're only dealing with one batch at a time rather than
 two. This is still with bubblewashing, by the way. We've used
 stir-washing quite a lot, but the two wash-tanks aren't properly set
 up for stirring yet. Next job. Or forthcoming job anyway.

snip
 
 Best
 
 Keith



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Lumpy BD

2004-08-03 Thread James Slayden

Thanks, Just seeing how people are stir washing.

James

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Keith Addison wrote:

 Keith, just a question.  How are you doing the stir washing?
 
 With a stirrer.
 
 Using the
 pump, or actually using a stirring mechanism?  I saw the thread on what
 Todd was saying about pump washing and was interesed on if and how
 people
 are doing that.
 
 We don't have a spare pump, and would rather keep any water out of
 the processor mixing pump, which probably does enough already without
 adding washing to its burden.
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 James
 
 On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Keith Addison wrote:
 
 snip
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 [rand=551058911]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
  *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
  *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Bergen county NJ?

2004-08-17 Thread James Slayden

That reminds me, most of the WVO that I get in my area (sushi, chinese
resturants), titrate to 2 - 2 1/2.  Not too far off virgin oil that
titrates to ~1.


James

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Keith Addison wrote:

 Hi, any straight veggie oil burners in Bergen County, NJ?
 I had been told Costco would have five gallon containers of canola oil
 for
 $10:00, and that would bring the cost down to $2:00 a gallon. I was
 kicking
 around the thought of converting an old '86 Mercedes 300SDL. for
 nearly a year,
 but one day I realized I never bothered to even confirm availability of
 veggie
 oil in my area. So I called Costco in Hackensack.
 The largest container of canola they had was one and a half gallons, at;
 EEK!
 $5:00!
 So, any suggestions?
 I would like to go green, not cheap, and have no place to process waste
 oil
 regardless. Straight veggie oil is burns cleaner, to my understanding.
 
 Cleaner than biodiesel? Very dubious assumption. Or do you mean
 virgin oil burns cleaner than waste oil? Maybe, depends on the oil.
 
 Mark recently posted a message on the pros and cons of SVO and
 biodiesel, including emissions:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/BIOFUEL/37564/
 
 And there's some emissions data and plenty of other information here:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_svo.html
 Straight vegetable oil as diesel fuel
 
 If you're committed to using straight vegetable oil, your best bet is
 to find a source of good-quality used oil, which is just a matter of
 looking, and asking.
 
 Best wishes
 
 Keith
 
 
 I don't
 mind matching the cost of pump diesel, but I sure don't want to spend
 $3:33 a
 gallon! Anyone in this area burning straight veggie oil? Anyone here
 running
 an '77-'85 Mercedes w123 240D or 300D, or an '81-'91 w126 300SD,
 300SDL., 350SD
 or 350SDL?
 Or even a 300SD prior to '81?
 Any comments?
 Thanks in advance!
 Gregory.
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 [rand=227435215]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
  *  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/
  
  *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[biofuel] 1st day of biofuel class w/ Girl Mark

2002-11-09 Thread James Slayden

Hola Biofuelers,

Today was the first day of a four part Biodiesel class at the Ecology
center in Berkley. There was about twenty four people atending with Girl
Mark teaching, and her trustworthy assistant 'Methman' (ie. Jeff) in tow.  
Below is a blow by blow of the first day.  BTW, also got some pictures
that if Keith would like to post or have a page dedicated to the class,
just let me know.  Didn't get a chance to use my Girlfriends Digital so
these will have to be processed in the coming weeks.  Might just post them
on OFOTO with a little narration.  

Regards,


James Slayden

9:30am  - lost my way in to the location and ended up almost in Concord,
  Ca.  Had to turn around on the 980 freeway and rely on some
  reverse direction intuition.

9:45am - Arrived at the Ecology Center in Berkley and a small group for
  the class started forming.  Interesting I thought it would be
  more packed, but I think that people are more interested in the
  finished product than actually creating Biodiesel.

10am- Girl Mark was running late so I spent some time looking at all
  the sustainable information available at the Ecology Center. If
  your ever in Berkley definitely stop by the center just for all
  the other goodies!

10:15ish - Girl Mark shows up!!  We get to helping unload and distribute
  her BD 'zine' and gear.  We introduce ourselves and explain why
  we are taking the class.  Class size is around 24.  The price
  per class was great!!  $15 - $60 sliding scale, almost a like a
  free will donation.  You pay either at each class or for the
  whole series, very Berkley.  =)

10:**am - Girl Mark starts in on the lecture portion of with some
  history of diesel, biodiesel, and some other good factiods. She
  makes a batch of blender BD with 'Methman' doing the dirty work.
  Girl Mark drills into us the safety precautions that should be
  taken.  This will not be the first time this will be said.  ;-)

12:30pm - Lunch!!  Not that your interested, but I had a tofu scramble at
  a little cafe down the steet with some fellow class members. I
  find out that what seems to be the concensus - that this the
  first time for most of us.

1:15pm  - Girl Mark dives right into titration!!  Guess she figured we
  need to get the difficult stuff out of the way first.  We split
  up into 4 groups and started practicing titration. It looked so
  easy when Girl Mark did it!!??  I now know how important
  measuring is and how easily it can be screwed up. Most of the
  members of our group titrate and come up with a consistant
  1.75ml.  The groups compare the numbers and we head out to the
  parking lot to do a biger batch.  
  
??:??pm - Time flys when your having fun.  We were going to do a methoxide
  batch, then Jeff thought he had some KOH and wanted to try that,
  so the blender batch of methoxide was scrapped and was made into
  another blender BD batch.  Then Jeff found out that he forgot
  the KOH and we went back the the original plan.  Some of the
  class members volunteered to be 'Methman' for some of the
  methoxide mixing which was kewl.  I was a little scared of the
  chemicals so I passed on the opportunity (my own personal
  deamon).  I will go for it next time though!!  Need to get over
  that .

3:15pmClass was suppose to be over, but since we started late, and
  lots of questions put us over the time.  I stayed to see the
  larger batch being mixed in small scale processor.  Half the
  class had left (pity), so it was a chance to get up and close
  with the processing.  BTW, Girl Mark brought two batch style,
  mixer processors made out of very convient and inexpensive
  materials (metal drums) easily found/made.  Not being that
  machanically inclined, it's not very intimidating to see how
  simple the processor can be made.  We talked a little bit about
  the processors and will go further into it later in the class.

It was a great first day and I think we all got a great start in feeling
comfortable with the process, titration, and working with the chemicals.  
It was a big suprise to most of us that it really is a simple process and
quite amazing that we can make our own fuel.

More to follow in the coming weeks (and pics).


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] What's your 20

2002-11-11 Thread James Slayden

hrmm, being in the service at one time in comm, for us it was copy you
5-by.  More in the light of can you here and understand me?.  ;-)

James

On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, csakima wrote:

 Your 20  short for 10-20 (most have heard of Roger, 10-4) 
 term
 used by one radio operator asking another where on the map are you??,
 since a radio mounted in an automobile could be anywhere.   I thought
 it
 appropriate ... since with the 'net, it's not always obvious where every
 email is coming from.
 
 Curtis
 
 Get your free newsletter at
 http://www.ezinfocenter.com/3122155/NL
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 20?
 
 
 -
 Introducing NetZero Long Distance
 1st month Free!
 Sign up today at: www.netzerolongdistance.com
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Project Help

2002-11-11 Thread James Slayden

hrmm, methinks that Melissa should contact Southern States Power Company
who are making comerce BD out of the LA area.  Don't know what process
they are using or what feedstock, cause it's been a while since I talked
to them (bad vibe when I called last).

James

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Keith Addison wrote:

 Wow, you want quite a lot of help.
 
 Alright, I have a few questions about a project I'm doing.
 
 1)Are there any politicians (Past and present) who have fervently
 supported biofuels, and is there any way I can contact them?
 
 The Governors of all the corn states all fervently support ethanol,
 for some strange reason. It was a hot potato in your legislature
 recently, I'm sure you can check it out. It's still a hot potato in
 your state, check out the state newspaper archives.
 
 For biodiesel, check out Minnesota.
 
 2)Can biofuels be applied on a large scale?  If so, why hasn't it
 happened already?
 
 What do you mean large scale? In 2001, the European Union produced
 and used 300 million gallons of biodiesel, rising very fast. The US
 produced and used 20 million gallons in 2001 (another figure says 35
 million gallons), up from 5 million gallons in 2000, according to the
 National Biodiesel Board. By 2016, the US expects to produce 800
 million gallons. The US Department of Energy has mentioned six
 billion gallons by the year 2020. That would be more than 15% of the
 diesel consumed in North America. But this doesn't make much sense to
 me, because it's according to growth based on current usage, and I
 don't think it's going to be that way.
 
 I'm not sure of the figures for ethanol, I'm sure you can find out
 easily enough. It's pretty much worldwide, for both fuels, with a
 different picture in each country, all changing rapidly.
 
 3)Who were/are the key developers of biofuels, and who are the key
 advocates today?
 
 We are. :-) Unless you want to believe World Energy.
 
 4) What are the main differences between ethanol and biodiesel?
 
 Ethanol is for spark-ignition (gasoline) motors, biodiesel is for
 diesel (compression-ignition) motors. Ethanol is an alcohol,
 biodiesel is an ester.
 
 Which is cleaner?  Which is cheaper?  What are the characteristics
 of each?  What are their primary uses?
 
 Oh, come on! Do your own homework! Anyway you're trying to compare
 chalk and cheese. Go prowl around Journey to Forever and Webconx a
 bit, you'll find info and leads there.
 
 5) Is there any chance that clean-engine diesel cars will ever be
 mass marketed in the U.S.?
 
 http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_future.html
 Do diesels have a future?
 
 6) I live in Claremont, CA (L.A. area), and I want to contact to
 local fuel and trucking companies to conduct a survey of their fuel
 practices.  Does anyone know how I can go about doing this?
 
 Do it.
 
 7) Does anyone have an interesting anecdote about their use of
 biofuels that I can use in my paper?
 
 :-) Sorry, I think that's funny. (I'm a journalist.)
 
 8) What sort of political barriers stand in the way of green fuel use?
 
 Much too general a question, I don't think I want to write a major
 essay for you, nor will anyone else. Hone down your questions a bit
 and use the archives, there's a very large amount of information on
 that there.
 
 Good luck.
 
 Keith
 
 Thanks for your input.
 Melissa Jahnke
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Mid sized Diesel pickups?

2002-11-11 Thread James Slayden

I was just talking about this with a member of the Biodiesel class over
the weekend and he was thinking of an Isuzu Pup, both for the pratical
reasons of having a truck, and the milage benefit of having a small
engine.  Dunno, it depends on what features your looking for.

James

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Martha Olson wrote:

 
 Well, my little ole Mazda pickup came to an untimely end last week
 (unfortunately with me in it) and I'm contemplating buying a diesel truck
 so I'd have the option of going with biofuel.
 
 I'd be looking for a 10 yr old ( + or - ) truck.  What models are readily
 available in the US?  What kind of MPG should I expect? Comments on
 reliability would be appreciated.
 
 Is there a point in the last 10 years when diesel engines got noticeably
 cleaner?  I think I'd favor the dual tank system and expect I'd be
 burning
 petrol diesel at least part of the time.
 
 Thanks in advance for any help.
 
 Martha
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Re: [biofuels-biz] Large and Small, All on the Same Team-- Was Re: more info on the NBB and the soy subsidy

2002-11-18 Thread James Slayden

Sorry, I just had to responde to something you said about the DIY'rs
sullying the image of BD??!!

In this last weekends class we did a little homebrew test for quality
against commerce BD and a batch from the Berkley co-op and they were about
the same.  If anything, the commerce BD that gets sent for ASTM and EPA
testing is prolly from a VERY carefully processed batch, whereas most
homebrew is carefully processed with each batch out of necessity (more
lovingly ;-)  ).  I wouldn't say all homebrewers are that concerned with
their batches, but to be a DIY'r is in itself a passion, and thus usually
more concerned.

James Slayden

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Andrew Hoppin wrote:

snip

 help?  Or could they be authentically concerned that a small producer
 making
 some mistake in production will sully the image of biodiesel?  Other
 possibilities?  Regardless, if you can identify what the root of their
 problem is, then whether that root cause seems silly or not, and
 regardless

snip
 
 Cheers,
 Andrew
 
 
 The Biofuel Business Development Project
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Biofuel-Business-Plan/
 Dedicated to Making An Immediate Impact
 On the Long-Range Future of Humanity
 
  Message: 12
 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:23:08 +0900
 From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: more info on the NBB and the soy subsidy
 
  Hello Andrew
 
  I'm would prefer to see a decentralized industry of small producers as
  well,
  but my bias is that if we're really going to make a near-term
  difference in
  our world in terms of energy security and environmental protection and
  public health with biodiesel, we need to support any and all
  companies that
  are willing to produce and distribute biodiesel, small and large.
  
  Cheers,
  Andrew
 
  Um, at the cost of having homebrewers dispensed with by means of a
  load of BS about us being nothing but a peril who'll bring it all to
  naught unless we're controlled? Or at least kept firmly in our place
  (our own backyards)? Though we can be useful... Check back and you'll
  see that that's basically what Mr Noyes of World Energy was saying.
  He was asked how many times? Three? Four? - to substantiate his
  claims that substandard-spec homebrew had caused widespread problems
  and industry had had to clean up the mess after us. He evaded the
  question each time. He can't substantiate it because it's BS. Not the
  only thing he evaded. If you think that will at least stop him making
  such unsubstantiated claims, even if he can't quite bring himself to
  withdraw them, don't hold your breath.
 
  Noyes, and others like him, couldn't cope with what we actually are
  and what we do, as opposed to his patronising idea of us. Have a look
  at how he handled the possibility of collaboration with us,
  laughable. It's on his terms or nothing, just like the other World
  Energy guy who wasted our time with this talk. We're more useful than
  these people, and it's them who make it an either-or question, not us.
 
  We're not against industry, that would be foolish, but there's
  industry and then there's industry. It's not a case of small vs
  large, there's room and need for both, as you say. Some of the big
  companies are just fine, no problem at all working with them. But
  frankly I think the world needs the likes of World Energy like it
  needs a hole in the head.
 {snip}
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Back Online

2002-11-24 Thread James Slayden

Just went to the seminar with Ianto Evans promoting his book The Hand
Sculpted House and it was excellent.  He showed pics of what a stick
frame built house looks like after mother nature takes over and what a cob
structure looks like (very organic, mud back to mud).  I started reading
some of the book when I got home because his talk was so engaging.  A very
humane way to build!!  I am hoping to go to one of the workshops in the
future.

http://www.deatech.com/cobcottage/

http://www.deatech.com/cobcottage/handsculpt.html

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1890132349/002-7931199-6777645

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1890132349.01.LZZZ.jpg

I heard it noted recently that Californians spend almost 80% of their time
indoors.  Interesting since the climate out here is one of the best in the
US.

James Slayden


On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Kim  Garth Travis wrote:

 I have found statistics that say for every three new houses built, one
 goes in the landfill, labor being more expensive than materials.  This
 being true, many of us have figured out how to build with the landfill
 materials.  There is a list dedicated to this topic,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 One man has started a movement to use landfill rescue to build homes for
 low income working families using minimum wage help.  His crew are
 usually young men that were at risk and after a year or two with him,
 they get hired by the big contractors.  His web site is
 phoenixcommotion.com
 
 Congratulations on trying to reduce the waste and build sensibly, not an
 easy task with building codes, banks and insurance companies involved.
 
 Bright Blessings,
 Kim
 
 robert luis rabello wrote:
 
  Hello Everyone!
 
  It's been five months since I've been able to post here.  My wife
  and I have built a new house, and not only have I learned a lot about
  the building process, I've been astonished at how much waste and
  inefficiency goes into putting up a home.
 
  1.  Builders love concrete.  We used WAY more concrete than I
  believed we would when we first considered this project.  I'm not
  certain we could have done much better than we did because our property
  slopes considerably, but concrete manufacturing is VERY energy
 intensive
  and next time we'll have to be more careful about property selection.
  Any ideas about alternatives out there?
 
  2.  The amount of waste generated by a building is simply
  astonishing!  I own a Ford Ranger with a short wheelbase and a small
  box.  I filled the thing 4 times with dimensional lumber cut too short
  for use, and hauled all of it out to my father in law so that he could
  mix it with his firewood this winter.  (Generally speaking, dimensional
  lumber is so dry that it burns too quickly for a clean fire and
  therefore produces excessive smoke.)  Surely gasification or clean
  pyrolysis would be much better alternatives than the landfill, where
 all
  of our oriented strand board, drywall, carpet scraps and other waste
  ended up.  What's worse, is that our tradesmen kept saying that we
  actually had very little waste. . .  Some of the houses going up around
  here have huge dumpsters that get filled more than once during the
  building!  (I had asked the architect who drew our plans to minimize
  waste by making room sizes as close to standard dimensions as possible.
  We ended up with a bigger house for less money that way.  Strange,
 isn't
  it?)
 
  3.  There's a certain momentum in doing things the conventional
  way.  The lender at our credit union looked at me as if I was crazy
 when
  I said I wanted solar hot water.  The builders simply didn't understand
  why I was so particular about southern orientation, minimizing north
  facing window sizes (our view is to the north, so I lost on that one. .
  ..), and people scratched their heads when I specified a relatively
 small
  electrical panel (just 100 amps of service!) and high efficiency
  lighting.  We argued about extra insulation in the ceiling, heat in the
  floor and the tiny size of our natural gas boiler.
 
  There's a lot of ignorance about energy issues out there.  I
 suppose
  people in forums like this one have a LOT of educating to do. . .
 
  robert luis rabello
 
 
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Biofuels list archives:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
  Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/.
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Re: [biofuel] Re: Back Online

2002-11-25 Thread James Slayden

Motie,

I bless you for that link!  :)

It's just what I was looking for.  

James Slayden

On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, motie_d wrote:

 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Only in America!!!
 
  I was not aware of that US made pallets of hardwood and did not
 think that
  it could ever be a stupid luxury consumption like this. I can see
 reason
  for some pallets to be made of hardwood, but they should be guarded
 and
  reused. But this irresponsible behavior cannot be excused. Six
 pallets of
  hardwood per American in land fills, give me a break!
 
 
 Hi Hakan,
 I suspect the actual number may be even higher. Truckers seem to get
 stuck with many of them. The problem is that so much stuff gets
 shipped on pallets, and receivers have huge piles of them on hand.
 They don't want any more, and require delivery trucks to take the
 pallets away when a delivery is made. Truckers have no need for them,
 and for a time were dumping them in the back lots of Truckstops, to
 such an extent that Truckstop Owenrs now hire Security Guards to
 prevent it.
 The cost to ship pallets back to the shipper is higher than the cost
 to produce new pallets.
 There is some effort in the Trucking industry to attempt to
 standardize the size of pallets to make them more reusable. Too many
 shippers have their own unique size and shape requirements.
 
 
 http://www.banditchippers.com/model_grinder3680.asp
 The solution for now, if a market can be found for the chips.
 
 Motie
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: Forests - was [biofuel] Re: Back Online

2002-11-26 Thread James Slayden

Hey wait, this is starting to remind men of the BD BIG/small producers



;-)

BTW, sustainable small logging operations are awesome!  I applaude them.

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, motie_d wrote:

 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I see your point Motie, but I do think you're being a bit one-
 sided.
 
 I must admit to that possability. I've been sampling a bit of 'Lawn
 mower fuel' that came out particularly well.
 
  I think you can assign blame in three directions, probably with not
  much to choose between them: wrong-headed environmentalists,
  large-scale commercial logging concerns, and bureaucrats.
 
 May I distribute the blame among these 3 as I see it from my local
 perspective? 90% air-headed 'Environmentalists, 8% high-level
 Bureaucrats, 2% Big Loggers who have failed to refute mis-information
 about themselves, despite their best efforts. Small Independant
 Loggers don't even get an honorable mention, and are in fact a major
 key to any solution.
 
  None is
  blame-free, and on the other hand, all have their points
 
 Many of them under their Hats
 
 - none is
  entirely evil or foolish either.
 
 I'll concur that none are deliberately evil. 'Foolish' is highly
 debatable.
 
  Somehow they've managed to get
  themselves into the worst possible relationship with each other,
 with
  the forests and the public being the victims.
 
 Professional Loggers, both Big and Small, have had a good working
 relationship with Professional Forestry Agents to the benefit of the
 public and the Forests for many years. 'Environmentalists' with
 little knowledge and much dis/mis-information have exerted political
 pressure to high-level Bureaucrats and politicians to the detriment
 of all.
 
  Not unusual.
 
 Unfortunately, I agreee.
 
  Similarly,
  you won't find solutions by excluding any of the three, and I
  perceive that you'd like to exclude the environmentalists, and
  perhaps less so the bureaucrats.
 
 None of the 3 can be excluded, and I think the Small Independant
 Logger also needs to be included, as they are the real key to a
 workable solution.
 In my opinion, their needs to be a distinction between high-level
 Bureaucrats and the local Foresters. I see the problem as being
 between 'Environmentalists' and the well-being of our Forests. The
 Loggers and the Bureaucrats are caught in the middle. None of the
 concerned parties wants to deliberately destroy the Forests. Loggers
 and professional Foresters KNOW what they are doing.
 The 'Environmentalists' may have the best of intentions, but are near-
 totally ignorant about the issues involved. High-level Bureaucrats
 are next in line in factual knowledge, and therefore are more easily
 susceptible to mis-information spread by activists. They are also
 more concerned with their careers than the health of the Forests, and
 are willing to do anything to appease those who may put a black mark
 in their record.
 
  Much experience elsewhere has shown
  that if you do that, the bureaucrats and commercial concerns will
  between them make the situation far worse than it is now.
 
 The Environmentalists have too much political clout to be forcefully
 excluded.(And honestly legitimate concerns) They need to be educated
 as to the harm they are doing in their ignorance. The high-level
 Bureaucrats will go along with whichever direction seems to be in the
 best interests of their career.
 
  Taking all
  the rules away and letting in the loggers is not the solution, and
  there's a rather huge amount of unfortunate evidence to hand to
  attest to that.
 
 I've never proposed taking all the rules away. I just think that the
 rules should be based on factual needs of the forest, by professional
 Foresters, not by a bunch of activists without a clue.
 
  Forests need management. What you describe is mismanagement or no
  management. No excuse for that, plenty of experience available on
  good forest management.
 
 That is exactly my point. The current situation is run on rules made
 to appease a bunch of activists with NO background in forest
 management. Despite the common perception, Loggers, many into the 3rd
 generation, have no intention to 'destroy' the forests they make
 their living from, and are highly annoyed when 'Environmentalists
 with no knowledge of proper management practices are making all the
 rules to the severe detriment to the forests.
 
  One thing that's emerged most clearly from
  forest work in 3rd World countries is that successful projects very
  much include the involvement at all levels of the local
 communities.
 
 Local communities who rely on the forests for a living, have little
 input into National Forest Policies. The policy decisions are made by
 high-level Bureaucrats who are attempting to appease activists. Most
 of these Bureaucrats have little or no background in Forestry, and
 are therefore easily misled by popular misperceptions. They are
 administrators and political appointees, 

Re: [biofuel] When you're a Geek and know what a computer can do .... You vote no Was: Direct Democracy

2002-11-26 Thread James Slayden

ah, unless it's an embedded system .  ;)

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, csakima wrote:

 The problem with that system would be ... who would be the system
 administrator of such a system???
 
 The Admin would have almost Godlike powers  since, being in charge of
 how votes are processes, would be able to make anyone he chooses ...
 win
 the elections.  And then later, through the media  ahem explain
 why the dude won.  I don't think I like the idea of having one single
 person
 (or two or three guys) control what the will of the people is.  You
 think
 power is concentrated NOW ... you try wait until system administrator's
 got
 the power to elect or not elect at the click of a mouse.
 
 Nope, not me,
 
 Curtis
 Computer Geek
 
 Get your free newsletter at
 http://www.ezinfocenter.com/3122155/NL
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   I wonder if anyone would like to make comment on the following...
   Direct Democracy
 
Teledemocracy   -   E-Democracy
 
 
 .The teledemocracy movement seeks to reform
 government to include the   voices of citizens in the
 policy making process.
 
 
 -
 Introducing NetZero Long Distance
 1st month Free!
 Sign up today at: www.netzerolongdistance.com
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] electrical pump

2002-11-26 Thread James Slayden

and there is this:

http://www.pumps-ez.com/pumps/0056064_0056064_1.html

the list seems extensive.

James Slayden

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Juan Boveda wrote:

 Hello John
 
 I would suggest an used engine oil pump from a junk yard, some of them
 comes with a coarse filter, over it if you wish, you could add a metalic
 mesh in front of it and an electrical drill to drive the pump.
 
 Regards
 
 Juan
 
 
 You wrote:
 
 I need a heavy duty electrical pump for sucking up badly contaminated
 WVO.
 My old one just collapsed. Any suggestions?
 
 John Venema
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
·FREE Health Insurance Quotes-eHealthInsurance.com
http://us.click.yahoo.com/1.voSB/RnFFAA/46VHAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Stars in their eyes

2002-11-27 Thread James Slayden

When WVO becomes a commodity and the price point reaches SVO, WVO will
loose it's attractiveness.  Unless Macky D's wants to start becoming a
processor themselves (which may end up happening as since they are paying
for the oil in the first place), I don't see any large margins in WVO for
the fast food industry.  Maybe the commodity cost will cover a partial
cost of the original oil, but remember WVO is considered a waste hazard
and a a renderer/BD processor could charge accordingly. And true hazardous
waste disposal is quite expensive these days.  ;-)

Again, some large processors (and small ones) could secure far reaching
contracts that obtain the WVO at a good price point right now.  As time
progresses some of the larger FF chains will smartin up and understand
what they have.  

Also, the advent of a good renewable diesel synfuel could blow out any
great hold on the market for WVO, and SVO for that matter.  But there will
always be people who care about the cycle of waste/sustainability and who
will choose to purchase Biodiesel no matter what.  I think that is called
a niche market 


James Slayden


On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, wannabeloved_2 wrote:

 Hello;
 
 Good point about third world...
 
 I can see the time when bio diesel will be marketed as a 'super' fuel
 and will priced accordingly--simple marketing dynamics. The only ones
 who will be able to afford it will be the very poor through aid
 programs or the well-to-do.
 
 I base this on my belief that raw fuel stocks such as WVO will become
 commodities-especially by the bigger chains McDonald'scDonalds-that
 can improve the profitability of restaurants.
 
 Oil is big business and when its demise comes bio diesel will be big
 business.  My advise to the small producers is enjoy the present and
 be prepared to be eaten by the sharks( via buy outs or other less
 pleasant means).
 
 Best Regards
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] electrical pump

2002-11-27 Thread James Slayden

on this note, Mark mentioned that granger is down this way (south bay),
but I can't seem to find a listing in the phone book.  Anyone know
directly their number down here so I can get over there?

Thank,

James Slayden

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, studio53 wrote:

 girl mark,
 
 I looked at the pump at Grainger. They also sell the head (pump) separate
 from the motor, so if one already had a motor... What is the RPMs on the
 you
 have?
 
 ---
 Jesse Parris  |  studio53  |  53 maitland rd  |  stamford, ct  06906
 203.324.4371www.jesseparris.com/
 - Original Message -
 From: girl mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:58 PM
 Subject: RE: [biofuel] electrical pump
 
 
  I have a Teel fryer filter pump from Grainger, and I think it's
  Grainger  model number
  7P098 snip
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Re: [biofuels-biz] Homebrew problems

2002-11-27 Thread James Slayden

Didn't we process a batch from the same resturante that was good (ie. a
later date)?  I thought we did that during class.  And you were mentioning
how unusual it was that you had this bad oil from a formerly good source.  
Had the bad oil experience, then went back and tested again and it was
good oil again?  I guess this is why you say to bring a titration test kit
when hunting oil.  ;-)

What your saying is really logical, that something acidic either got mixed
in or rooting food caused and acidic condition.

Dunno, although a scenario might be they just tossed some bad
vinager/acidic crap in the bin.  Operator error is usually the cause in
computer stuff, so why should it be any different with a resturante?

James Slayden

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, girl mark wrote:

 This brings up a question I';ve had for a while-
 
 are there other acids besides ffa, that are not water-soluble and are
 found
 in oils?
 
 We had some particularly terrible oil that titrated at 13 ml, and I just
 couldn't bring myself to believe that it was ffa causing the high values
 in
 the titration, as that restaurant always had decent oil before that
 particular sample. I tried doing what you're describing- washing the oil
 and pH testing the wash water and also re-titrating the oil layer to see
 if
 the acidity was something caused by water-solubles (vinegar from cooking,
 or acids from food rotting), and it seemed that it was still something
 insoluble, presumably ffa.
 thoughts?
 mark
 
 
 
 
 
 At 01:21 AM 11/27/2002 +, you wrote:
 The problems of quality of homebrew or commercial for that matter
 never seem to go away. As much as I would like to pretend that our
 bio is perfect, I want to share the latest of ours problems with the
 group in the hope that some one may benefit. I got a call that the
 fuel from the storage tank had clogged the filter on Tony's crane
 truck. Not with algae but with grease. Bear in mind that it been
 over 30°C. I went over the process that Tony had been using. We had
 been concentrating on fine tuning the separators to continually
 remove the glycerol as it formed, the fuel was completely reacted and
 the temperature was over the melting points of our longest fatty acid
 esters. The problem had to come from the washing. Now washing is a
 brutal affair compared with bubble washing and getting the emulsion
 to break involves acidifying the water(slightly I would have hoped.).
 I ran some thick cream from the bottom drain of the storage tank
 and tested it for FFA's by mixing with neutral water and titrating
 the layers. The water remained neutral but the oil took ¾ ml of
 standard NaOH . I deduced that I was dealing with FFA's not an
 inorganic acid. After performing a number of trials using acid
 catalysis and the three alcohols on hand. I found that the controls
 using alcohol alone reduced the acid number and clarified the
 product. Addition of  5% of methanol without the addition of
 Sulphuric clarified the goop within 30 minutes  at ambient
 temperature.
 We modified the post washing stage . Drying was achieved by heating
 the fuel to 115° while pumping from the bottom and spraying over
 the open top. As the dry fuel cooled to 60°C 2% methanol was added
 and the lid closed for recirculating. Once cool, ~30°C, this fuel was
 pumped across to the storage vat.  I have neglected research on the
 washing stage, hopefully we can shorten this step as well. When the
 separators work well a 200l batch can be reacted and separated to
 completion in under an hour. I believe that the separators would have
 to spin much faster to be of use in post-wash separation. I have
 designed a simple vertical centrifuge to take the place of the dairy
 separators. If I get around to building it I'll post the results.
 
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Bio fuel business-Tables

2002-12-05 Thread James Slayden

Might you want to also provide a table with Hydrogen and producer gas
also?  Seems to me to be somewhat narrow, unless that is the intention.

James Slayden

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Hakan Falk wrote:

 
 Hi Keith,
 
 Thank you for your response and I am somewhat uncomfortable with the
 second
 table. I am not sure of that the presentation of political -  commercial
 -
 influencing points are suitable in a table. Need to think more about it.
 Therefore I like to discuss the basics first and the table
 Characteristics, comparing Ethanol, Biodiesel and SVO. first.
 
 I do think that the table Characteristics, comparing Ethanol, Biodiesel
 and SVO. can be useful and ask you or others to suggest points that I
 maybe have missed. I must also underline that this is not a question of
 choice between them, they are all desperately needed and that is also
 covered in the table. On those points we agree.
 
 I have marked the  points we agree on, in table at,
 
 http://energy.saving.nu/biofuels/biofuelorg.shtml from yours at
 http://journeytoforever.org/ethanol_compare.html
 
 The open points are:
 Possible crops:
 I changed this to Possible raw material sources, to be sure that I do
 not
 exclude trees and fruits. I like to have more discussions about this, but
 all that I have seen until now points to more source material for
 vegetable
 oil.
 
 Soil sensitivity:
 Here I am in deep water and need your expertise. It is a very important
 point and I would like you to analyze it further.
 
 Crop rotation problems:
 The same as previous point. But I thought with effective oil producing
 trees or more choices of crops, it would be easier to overcome.
 
 Fuel productivity per acre:
 Again, the production numbers I have seen for oil are better than for
 Ethanol. It is however a weak point, since we do not look at the total
 possible production of ethanol and veg oil from the same source.
 
 Possible bi-products:
 The same as for previous point. Veg. oil do opens up for a larger number
 of
 replacement applications, among those are many in the lubrication field.
 
 Chemical altering or distilling:
 I corrected this.
 
 Energy for production:
 I read a lot and I seems that ethanol is the most energy demanding
 process,
 oil pressing definitely is the least. Biodiesel as I understand the
 process, is much less energy demanding than alcohol. On producing raw
 material they are all similar, but distilling is a very energy demanding
 process.
 
 Net energy gain:
 The fossil fuel processes are also very energy demanding and not very
 effective, but it is mostly conversion processes to marketable products.
 Some of the raw material for ethanol, do contain more or less veg oil. We
 can maybe add this aspect also, but as I see it, it becomes a part of raw
 material evaluation.
 
 Cost to produce:
 See energy for production.
 
 End use efficiency:
 Needed clarification and I changed heading to End use efficiency for
 fuel/technology, this to clarify that a change in fuel/technology will
 achieve substantial energy savings. I do not think we will disagree with
 this.
 
 Needed quantity to replace fossil fuel:
 Water can be added to gasoline also, with similar energy savings. The
 difference is that the water/air have to be added at injection. All
 testimonies and technical adjustments point to more quantity use with
 replacement of gasoline with ethanol and unchanged quantities with
 replacements of diesel.
 
 Storage time:
 I corrected this.
 
 I do not cover combined production of ethanol and veg oil from the same
 source and it would be very useful to discuss this. Maybe it is not a
 biodiesel or ethanol business, it could be that you need to combine both
 for a good business.
 
 Hakan
 
 
 At 12:33 PM 12/5/2002 +0100, Hakan Falk wrote:
 
 Keith,
 
 Thank you, I will go through it and we will discuss
 the differences.
 
 Hakan
 
 
 At 08:02 PM 12/5/2002 +0900, you wrote:
  Hi Hakan
  
   It is difficult to make tables in mail, if you cannot use html.
   Therefore I also did the tables at the end of,
   
   http://energy.saving.nu/biofuels/biofuelorg.shtml
   
   Hakan
  
  Difficult too to discuss them by email, for the same reason, so I
  copied your tables and did an alternative version for comparison,
  here:
  http://journeytoforever.org/ethanol_compare.html
  
  Best
  
  Keith
  
  
   At 04:08 PM 12/4/2002 +0100, Hakan Falk wrote:
   
Keith,

Original draft for article at
http://energy.saving.nu/biofuels/biofuelorg.shtml

You just posted several press releases from oil companies and
 these are
quite telling. They touch very much the subject of my article. The
situation in Poland and the moonshine argument, show the
 relevance of
this discussion. David have already started to think about it and
 I hope
that we get more valuable views.

To add to the discussion about centralization versus
  decentralization risk
for Ethanol and biodiesel/SVO, I have done the following tables. I

Re: [biofuel] BioD - 70's Mercedes

2002-12-05 Thread James Slayden

Could someone point Lee to a Moonlighting Diesel Mech in the Bay Area.  I
know him personally and he would like to get his 300D going on BD (I have
an interest here to make some fuel for him pro-bono for my own
experience).  So, if anyone knows of anyone, it would help him.

Thanks,

James Slayden


On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 craig, i have a 1980 merc. 300 d. what evperiance are you looking for?
 I'm
 looking for a mechanic to help me get it running. It has a rebuilt engine
 that is good but the fuel injection pump needs to be aligned. lee
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Interesting info for Bay Area BD proponents

2002-12-05 Thread James Slayden

While perusing the West Coast Biofuels page, I came across their
Biodiesel Users area and what did I find:

-
San Jose Green Team Recycling and Trash services runs their equipment on
B20 a blend of 20% BioDiesel and 80% petroleum diesel.

Trash trucks travel at low speeds and operate thier equipment at high idle
causing these trucks to be heavy polluters in our neighborhoods. Green
Team has taken the lead to improve air quality and reduce harmful
emissions.

They have seen no difference in performance compared to petroleum diesel
said, Todd Hanson, Director of Operations everyone notices the improved
smell and that the exhaust cleaner using BioDiesel.
--

Now to get them to utilize B100.  Sigh 

James Slayden


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Bio fuel business-Tables

2002-12-05 Thread James Slayden

Hi Hakan,

I would counter what is ready for use?  Seems to me there is quite a few
CNG vehicles out there that would be able to run on producer gas without
neary a hitch. As for Hydro, a gas conversion to a standard petro vehicle
is possible now.  The only thing that is missing on both is a fueling
infrastructure.  I believe there are now stand alone units for producing
hydro at petro stations via natural gas and electrolysis. Well, unless one
is in the midwest, E-85 really isn't an option, and to convert a standard
engine would be about the same as converting to CNG or Hydro.  The only
true ready for use alternative fuel is BD.

Not to say there isn't room for all of the above in varying stages of
implementation, which is what I think your getting at.

James Slayden
  
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Hakan Falk wrote:

 
 Dear James,
 
 I will be happy to, if it is a ready for use technology and anyone
 of us could start a bio fuel business around it. The concept of
 my article is bio fuel business. With the demand of ready for use
 technologies, the subject is surprisingly narrow and it says something
 about the real stage of things, on short and medium term.
 
 Toyota and Honda have just leased fuel cell cars and they say that
 production of the cars is planned to start in about 8-9 years. It will
 take
 at least 3-4 replacement cycles before it will have a major impact on
 the fleets. Maybe I will still be alive and in this case I am 100 years
 old, but I will remember it and include in the list at that time. If I
 forget it, I am sure that you or Keith will remind me. (do not feel
 offended by my joke, it is only their as a reminder of the time lines)
 
 It is however interesting and I have noted it down and will expand
 the table on a more long term subject.
 
 Hakan
 
 
 At 10:26 AM 12/5/2002 -0800, you wrote:
 Might you want to also provide a table with Hydrogen and producer gas
 also?  Seems to me to be somewhat narrow, unless that is the intention.
 
 James Slayden
 
 On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Hakan Falk wrote:
 
  
   Hi Keith,
  
   Thank you for your response and I am somewhat uncomfortable with the
   second
   table. I am not sure of that the presentation of political - 
 commercial
   -
   influencing points are suitable in a table. Need to think more about
 it.
   Therefore I like to discuss the basics first and the table
   Characteristics, comparing Ethanol, Biodiesel and SVO. first.
  
   I do think that the table Characteristics, comparing Ethanol,
 Biodiesel
   and SVO. can be useful and ask you or others to suggest points that
 I
   maybe have missed. I must also underline that this is not a question
 of
   choice between them, they are all desperately needed and that is also
   covered in the table. On those points we agree.
  
   I have marked the  points we agree on, in table at,
  
   http://energy.saving.nu/biofuels/biofuelorg.shtml from yours at
   http://journeytoforever.org/ethanol_compare.html
  
   The open points are:
   Possible crops:
   I changed this to Possible raw material sources, to be sure that I
 do
   not
   exclude trees and fruits. I like to have more discussions about this,
 but
   all that I have seen until now points to more source material for
   vegetable
   oil.
  
   Soil sensitivity:
   Here I am in deep water and need your expertise. It is a very
 important
   point and I would like you to analyze it further.
  
   Crop rotation problems:
   The same as previous point. But I thought with effective oil
 producing
   trees or more choices of crops, it would be easier to overcome.
  
   Fuel productivity per acre:
   Again, the production numbers I have seen for oil are better than for
   Ethanol. It is however a weak point, since we do not look at the
 total
   possible production of ethanol and veg oil from the same source.
  
   Possible bi-products:
   The same as for previous point. Veg. oil do opens up for a larger
 number
   of
   replacement applications, among those are many in the lubrication
 field.
  
   Chemical altering or distilling:
   I corrected this.
  
   Energy for production:
   I read a lot and I seems that ethanol is the most energy demanding
   process,
   oil pressing definitely is the least. Biodiesel as I understand the
   process, is much less energy demanding than alcohol. On producing raw
   material they are all similar, but distilling is a very energy
 demanding
   process.
  
   Net energy gain:
   The fossil fuel processes are also very energy demanding and not very
   effective, but it is mostly conversion processes to marketable
 products.
   Some of the raw material for ethanol, do contain more or less veg
 oil. We
   can maybe add this aspect also, but as I see it, it becomes a part of
 raw
   material evaluation.
  
   Cost to produce:
   See energy for production.
  
   End use efficiency:
   Needed clarification and I changed heading to End use efficiency for
   fuel/technology, this to clarify that a change in fuel/technology

Re: [biofuel] Interesting info for Bay Area BD proponents

2002-12-06 Thread James Slayden

West Coast Biofuels, Inc.

www.westcoastbiofuels.com

Located in Newport beach, contact Dick O'Rourke


On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, girl mark wrote:

 James,
 what webpage is this west coast one you're talking about?
 
 Mark
 
 
 At 02:56 PM 12/5/2002 -0800, you wrote:
 While perusing the West Coast Biofuels page, I came across their
 Biodiesel Users area and what did I find:
 
 -
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] A Really Dumb Idea

2002-12-06 Thread James Slayden

Robert,

A good many of the Ford Rangers are already set up as FFV's, might want to
check to see if you model is one.  Ususlly there is a little plack on the
gate that has a highway and a greenleaf.  But I would check with a model
database online to verify for sure. If it is an FFV it will allow you to
run E-85, ie. 85% ethanol - 15% gas.  Then you could blend your own.

James Slayden

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, robert luis rabello wrote:

 Hello everyone!
 
 I now live a little over 40 km away from work, and during my drive
 home tonight I was mulling over the whole idea of using ethanol as a
 fuel for my 2.3 liter Ford Ranger.  The problem with distillation, aside
 from legality issues, stems from the energy required to adequately
 separate ethanol from water.  So I did a little bit of math in my head:
 
 My truck uses 1 liter of gasoline for roughly every 10 kilometers of
 travel.  That's a little more than 3 kw of energy--most of which (at
 least 50%) ends up in either the coolant or the exhaust.  For every 10
 kilometers I drive, I have at least 1 500 watts of throw away energy
 available in the form of heat.
 
 Let's pretend for a moment that I have a tank of fermented beer
 and a tank of water onboard.  The water will be pumped to the front of
 my truck and run through a transmission cooler to lower its
 temperature.  The beer, on the other hand, gets pumped through a heat
 exchanger connected to the hottest part of my truck's radiator.  (If I
 need more heat, I can use the exhaust header.)
 
 By designing a zig zag, or coiled stripping column (using the
 cooled water to regulate temperature), I could separate the ethanol and
 return the tailings to the beer tank.  (In fact, I COULD use my engine
 to drive a vacuum pump that would allow lower temperature operation
 too!)  The ethanol can run through another transmission cooler which
 acts as a condenser, and from there into the truck's main fuel tank.
 
 It's distillation as you drive!
 
 Perhaps I need some sleep right now. . .
 
 Has anyone experimented with ethanol using oversized injectors on a
 computer controlled multi port fuel injection engine?
 
 robert luis rabello
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Bio fuel business-Tables

2002-12-06 Thread James Slayden

Hi Hakan,

The net energy in Cellulose based ethanol might be higher if the lingin is
burned for processing.  Since there is issues burning the Glyc from BD it
wouldn't add to the BD net energy.

The window of opportunity is really dependent on feedstock availability
which really isn't decreasing.  It might be that with WVO as the feedstock
a baseline commodity pricing structure will occur, but again as Keith just
posted again that the average collection of WVO runs around 10% there is a
good lead in period before pricing structures begin (in general).  

With Ethanol, the perception barrier to opposition and acceptance is the
utilization of Cellulostic feedstock vs. food crop feedstock.  Not that in
the real world this is an issue, just a hyped perception issue by the
media. As we well know that most of the grains in this counrty go to
animal feed anyway.  But acceptance will be based on this false
assumption.

Looking at the table, you might want to put a catagory like Socitial
Acceptance to define some possible inhibitors.

James Slayden

On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Hakan Falk wrote:

 
 Hi Keith,
 
 Thank you for the help, it is very useful.
 
 At 07:36 PM 12/6/2002 +0900, you wrote:
 snip
  Possible bi-products:
  The same as for previous point. Veg. oil do opens up for a larger
 number of
  replacement applications, among those are many in the lubrication
 field.
 
 The main by-product of each is stockfeed - DDG and seedcake, not much
 to choose between them.
 
 Ethanol's use as an oxygenate additive to gasoline is comparable to
 the use of B5 as a lubrication booster for ULSD.
 
 Lubricants made from vegoils are not for backyard operations -
 centralized.
 
 I think the major difference is perhaps the heating oil application,
 and power generation.
 snip
 
  Energy for production:
  I read a lot and I seems that ethanol is the most energy demanding
 process,
  oil pressing definitely is the least. Biodiesel as I understand the
  process, is much less energy demanding than alcohol. On producing raw
  material they are all similar, but distilling is a very energy
 demanding
  process.
 
 See above. See also Butterfield still references above.
 Plant Performance Data
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/Butterfield/butterfield1.html#perf
 
 
 Any process that uses a change of state i.e. solid to liquid to gas, uses
 a
 lot of energy at boiling temperature. This even if you have a
 recuperating
 system. I also read the link,
 
 http://www.carbohydrateeconomy.org/ceic/library/admin/uploadedfiles/How_Much_En
 rgy_Does_it_Take_to_Make_a_Gallon_.html
 
 
 carefully and it says about Btu per gallon,
 
 Corn based, Industry average : net energy gain = (energy ethanol) 81,400
 +
 (energy undefined co-products) 27,579 - (used energy) 81,090 = 30,589
 (38%
 gain)
 
 Corn based, Industry best : net energy gain = (energy ethanol) 81,400 +
 (energy undefined co-products) 36,261 - (used energy) 57,504 = 62,857
 (109%
 gain)
 
 Corn based, State of the Art Industry : net energy gain = (energy
 ethanol)
 81,400 + (energy undefined co-products) 36,261 - (used energy) 47,948 =
 62,857 (151% gain)
 
 Cellulose based,  Industry : net energy gain = (energy ethanol) 81,400 +
 (energy undefined co-products) 115,400 - (used energy) 76,093 = 122,407
 (162% gain)
 
 What are the co-products? Do they go in the tank? How do you use Gluten
 meal, Protein feed and Carbon dioxide in the tank?
 
 Read for Biodiesel that for 1 unit energy used it goes 3.2 units in the
 tank.
 
 If you do not mind, I will keep my evaluation for this.
 
 
 
 Sugar ethanol production tends to use the bagasse as an energy
 source. I think there are many such possibilities. Also there's the
 relative value of using non-mobile fuel to produce mobile fuel, which
 puts a different sort of value on it. (Same with biodiesel perhaps.)
 
 Yes, bagasse can be used as heating source or as feedstock, this is the
 same as they do for fossil fuel. Since we have not done comparable
 evaluation for Biodiesel, the byproducts energy values are missing.  I
 suspect that this and the less use of fertilizers, pesticides,
 irrigation,
 more manual labor etc. are the reasons why Ethanol from sugar cane are a
 definite positive energy producer in Brazil.
 
 
  Net energy gain:
  The fossil fuel processes are also very energy demanding and not very
  effective, but it is mostly conversion processes to marketable
 products.
  Some of the raw material for ethanol, do contain more or less veg oil.
 We
  can maybe add this aspect also, but as I see it, it becomes a part of
 raw
  material evaluation.
 
 It's hardly explored - as I keep saying, what about the oil in the
 maize? And so on.
 
 See previous point.
 
 
  Cost to produce:
  See energy for production.
 
 See Butterfield refs.
 
 See Energy for production.
 
 
  End use efficiency:
  Needed clarification and I changed heading to End use efficiency for
  fuel/technology, this to clarify that a change in fuel/technology

Re: [biofuel] Casual Observations

2002-12-09 Thread James Slayden

WOW!!  Really scary site.  Take a look under the database of field trials
and ya get to see all the nice GMO foods out there, country, and GMO
supplier.

Now I know where Crichton get's his story line from 

James Slayden


On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, k5farms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We added more free fatty acids to the oil and then added the   
 caustic, explains Wan. Though the method doesn't seem logical, 
 it worked. The oil was lighter in color than before, and all its
 existing free fatty acids as well as those that Wan had supplied
 were essentially removed.
 
 Can't copy the specific link but go to:
 http://www.agribiz.com/INTEGRO/Bionews/
 and select the link /From Oil Refinement to Baby Formula/
 
 They didn't happen to say anything about ratios/amounts!
 But something to think about, eh?
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] A Really Dumb Idea

2002-12-09 Thread James Slayden

Tailgate 

http://www.ford.com/en/ourVehicles/environmentalVehicles/ethanolVehicles.htm

There are links from there to check which models/years.

James Slayden


On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Kim  Garth Travis wrote:

 What year Rangers?  What do you mean by 'gate'?
 Bright Blessings,
 Kim
 
 James Slayden wrote:
 
  Robert,
 
  A good many of the Ford Rangers are already set up as FFV's, might want
 to
  check to see if you model is one.  Ususlly there is a little plack on
 the
  gate that has a highway and a greenleaf.  But I would check with a
 model
  database online to verify for sure. If it is an FFV it will allow you
 to
  run E-85, ie. 85% ethanol - 15% gas.  Then you could blend your own.
 
  James Slayden
 
  On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, robert luis rabello wrote:
 
Hello everyone!
   
I now live a little over 40 km away from work, and during my
 drive
home tonight I was mulling over the whole idea of using ethanol as a
fuel for my 2.3 liter Ford Ranger.  The problem with distillation,
 aside
from legality issues, stems from the energy required to adequately
separate ethanol from water.  So I did a little bit of math in my
 head:
   
My truck uses 1 liter of gasoline for roughly every 10
 kilometers of
travel.  That's a little more than 3 kw of energy--most of which (at
least 50%) ends up in either the coolant or the exhaust.  For every
 10
kilometers I drive, I have at least 1 500 watts of throw away
 energy
available in the form of heat.
   
Let's pretend for a moment that I have a tank of fermented
 beer
and a tank of water onboard.  The water will be pumped to the front
 of
my truck and run through a transmission cooler to lower its
temperature.  The beer, on the other hand, gets pumped through a
 heat
exchanger connected to the hottest part of my truck's radiator.  (If
 I
need more heat, I can use the exhaust header.)
   
By designing a zig zag, or coiled stripping column (using the
cooled water to regulate temperature), I could separate the ethanol
 and
return the tailings to the beer tank.  (In fact, I COULD use my
 engine
to drive a vacuum pump that would allow lower temperature operation
too!)  The ethanol can run through another transmission cooler which
acts as a condenser, and from there into the truck's main fuel tank.
   
It's distillation as you drive!
   
Perhaps I need some sleep right now. . .
   
Has anyone experimented with ethanol using oversized injectors
 on a
computer controlled multi port fuel injection engine?
   
robert luis rabello
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
   
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
   
Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
   
Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
   
 
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Biofuels list archives:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
  Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/.
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] A Really Dumb Idea

2002-12-09 Thread James Slayden

sorry, here is a better link:

http://www.fleet.ford.com/truckbbas/non-html/2000/BBRANGER.PDF

Looks like the 3.0L(182 CID) FFV SEFI V-6 is the model to look for


James Slayden

On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Kim  Garth Travis wrote:

 What year Rangers?  What do you mean by 'gate'?
 Bright Blessings,
 Kim
 
 James Slayden wrote:
 
  Robert,
 
  A good many of the Ford Rangers are already set up as FFV's, might want
 to
  check to see if you model is one.  Ususlly there is a little plack on
 the
  gate that has a highway and a greenleaf.  But I would check with a
 model
  database online to verify for sure. If it is an FFV it will allow you
 to
  run E-85, ie. 85% ethanol - 15% gas.  Then you could blend your own.
 
  James Slayden
 
  On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, robert luis rabello wrote:
 
Hello everyone!
   
I now live a little over 40 km away from work, and during my
 drive
home tonight I was mulling over the whole idea of using ethanol as a
fuel for my 2.3 liter Ford Ranger.  The problem with distillation,
 aside
from legality issues, stems from the energy required to adequately
separate ethanol from water.  So I did a little bit of math in my
 head:
   
My truck uses 1 liter of gasoline for roughly every 10
 kilometers of
travel.  That's a little more than 3 kw of energy--most of which (at
least 50%) ends up in either the coolant or the exhaust.  For every
 10
kilometers I drive, I have at least 1 500 watts of throw away
 energy
available in the form of heat.
   
Let's pretend for a moment that I have a tank of fermented
 beer
and a tank of water onboard.  The water will be pumped to the front
 of
my truck and run through a transmission cooler to lower its
temperature.  The beer, on the other hand, gets pumped through a
 heat
exchanger connected to the hottest part of my truck's radiator.  (If
 I
need more heat, I can use the exhaust header.)
   
By designing a zig zag, or coiled stripping column (using the
cooled water to regulate temperature), I could separate the ethanol
 and
return the tailings to the beer tank.  (In fact, I COULD use my
 engine
to drive a vacuum pump that would allow lower temperature operation
too!)  The ethanol can run through another transmission cooler which
acts as a condenser, and from there into the truck's main fuel tank.
   
It's distillation as you drive!
   
Perhaps I need some sleep right now. . .
   
Has anyone experimented with ethanol using oversized injectors
 on a
computer controlled multi port fuel injection engine?
   
robert luis rabello
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
   
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
   
Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
   
Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
   
 
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Biofuels list archives:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
  Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/.
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Car power inverter on sale

2002-12-09 Thread James Slayden

Hola Biofuelers,

There is an 400watt Auto DC/AC Power inverter on sale at Target.  Since
the cost of the Greasecar/Neoteric's oil pumping unit may be beyond some
of our pocketbooks, the inverter w/ a 110AC pump might be a substitute.  

It looks like it has both battery clips and a optional lighter socket.

Enjoy,

James Slayden




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Bio fuel business-Tables

2002-12-09 Thread James Slayden

Hi Hakan,

On the note of Socitial Acceptance, it is more than just a Big vs. Small
issue, it is a usage issue by the public.  If a consumer 'perceives' some
sort of limitation in the acceptance and usage of a alternative fuel, then
the business case will have to overcome and be able to sustain that
perception for a period of time.  Ethanol and Biodiesel are still somewhat
stigmatized, although there is push to overcome this at many levels.  Last
year ADM was running ads on television for ethanol, which I can only
assume is priming the market.  Quite effective for prepairing folks to
make a switch to an alterantive fuel.  By the time they do sell E85 in a
market, there will be enough interest to sustain that market until the
economies of scale come into play.  This actually benefits the small
producer as his product is locally produced and sold, thus lowering his
overhead.  The small producer benefits from the blanket media infusion of
a Big Alternative Fuels.  The only thing the Big AF has to do is void
the credability of the small producer to maintain the market.  And the
only thing the small producer has to do is secure enough local contracts
to maintain the business.  It then becomes more of a niche market for the
local producer, which can also be very lucrative.

Lots of niche markets survive out there and do extreemely well.  If I was
a small producer, I would try to distinguish my product from Big AF,
maybe in utilizing an all organic feedstock, or maybe emphasizing my local
community connections, or even the nature of my feedstock source such as
using WVO as opposed to using GMO crop residue, etc.  A great amount of
marketing leaway here.  ;-)


James Slayden

On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Hakan Falk wrote:

 
 Hi James,
 
 Very good, a lot in a short message. This idea about biofuel business
 start
 to be more work than I originally thought. Taking the idea of a business,
 does put some real sustainable demands on the thoughts. Every time I get
 a
 few moments to think about it, several new ideas pops up in my mind,
 nearly
 as frequent as the irritating pop-up ads on Internet.
 
 1. Crops and trees give some burnable residues for BD also.
 2. Good point about WVO, so a sustainable BD business need to be based on
 SVO.
 3. I see more and more recycling plants for WVO to BD. Large Spanish
 interests are putting up 4 of them and are starting to pay for WVO. This
 supports your thoughts.
 4. Social acceptance is a good one and touch very much the table
 (presentation) big vs. small that I still thinking about. How do you
 present and evaluate this kind of things.
 
 Hakan
 
 At 08:36 PM 12/6/2002 -0800, you wrote:
 Hi Hakan,
 
 The net energy in Cellulose based ethanol might be higher if the lingin
 is
 burned for processing.  Since there is issues burning the Glyc from BD
 it
 wouldn't add to the BD net energy.
 
 The window of opportunity is really dependent on feedstock availability
 which really isn't decreasing.  It might be that with WVO as the
 feedstock
 a baseline commodity pricing structure will occur, but again as Keith
 just
 posted again that the average collection of WVO runs around 10% there is
 a
 good lead in period before pricing structures begin (in general).
 
 With Ethanol, the perception barrier to opposition and acceptance is the
 utilization of Cellulostic feedstock vs. food crop feedstock.  Not that
 in
 the real world this is an issue, just a hyped perception issue by the
 media. As we well know that most of the grains in this counrty go to
 animal feed anyway.  But acceptance will be based on this false
 assumption.
 
 Looking at the table, you might want to put a catagory like Socitial
 Acceptance to define some possible inhibitors.
 
 James Slayden
 
 On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Hakan Falk wrote:
 
  
   Hi Keith,
  
   Thank you for the help, it is very useful.
  
   At 07:36 PM 12/6/2002 +0900, you wrote:
   snip
Possible bi-products:
The same as for previous point. Veg. oil do opens up for a larger
   number of
replacement applications, among those are many in the lubrication
   field.
   
   The main by-product of each is stockfeed - DDG and seedcake, not
 much
   to choose between them.
   
   Ethanol's use as an oxygenate additive to gasoline is comparable to
   the use of B5 as a lubrication booster for ULSD.
   
   Lubricants made from vegoils are not for backyard operations -
   centralized.
   
   I think the major difference is perhaps the heating oil application,
   and power generation.
   snip
   
Energy for production:
I read a lot and I seems that ethanol is the most energy demanding
   process,
oil pressing definitely is the least. Biodiesel as I understand
 the
process, is much less energy demanding than alcohol. On producing
 raw
material they are all similar, but distilling is a very energy
   demanding
process.
   
   See above. See also Butterfield still references above.
   Plant Performance Data
  
 http://journeytoforever.org

Re: [biofuel] [m]ethyl esters to methane

2002-12-13 Thread James Slayden

Would be interesting to to have that methane cleaned up and processed into
methanol.  :)  A small bio-source of methanol .  mm

Anyone know of a small methanol processing unit?

James Slayden

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, girl mark wrote:

 It seems a little backwards to do this- after all  the methanol is
 reformulated from methane, no?
 
 I'm reading a great book called 'a chinese biogas manual' about methane
 digesters. they're mostly talking about large-scale (large family or work
 group within a large rural commune). My friend the UC Davis grad student
 studying digesters (and building them, and teaching about them, and
 probably thinking about little but anaerobic bacteria and how to make
 them
 comfortable!) uses a small-scale design that's based on an old water
 heater
 as a demo digester. DOn't know how much comes out of one of those but I
 think it's signficant. So there's fairly easy ways of making methane
 without resorting to chemical cracking of hydrocarbons when the bacteria
 can do it for you. One of my buddies wants to build one to digest excess
 glycerine from biodiesel.
 
 Mark
 
 
 
 At 12:44 AM 12/13/2002 -0500, you wrote:
 Well I have been reading about hydrocarbon cracking on the hobbicast
 list and trying to stir up some information. So I was thinking about
 biodiesel and wondering if you could do the same with it. Perhaps I can
 burn biodiesel in my melting furnace! :)
 Or perhaps biodiesel could be broken into thinner chains to make it's
 gel point lower. My sister is a chemistry major I'll have to ask her.
 
 Shameless endorsement: hobbicast
 http://infoarchive.net/index.php?list=hobbicasthttp://infoarchive.net/index
 php?list=hobbicast
 is archived at the
 infoarchive http://infoarchive.net/http://infoarchive.net/, as well
 as
 12 other groups.
 
 Glenn wrote:
 
  Martin,
  
  Time to dig out the organic chemistry books again
  :)
  
  In theory it is possible to break methyl esters
  or any other hydrocarbon chain into smaller CH4 molecules.
  
  
  
 
 
 --
 ---
 Martin Klingensmith
 http://nnytech.net/http://nnytech.net/
 http://infoarchive.net/
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlhttp://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.
 tml
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] [m]ethyl esters to methane

2002-12-13 Thread James Slayden

hrmm,

wonder if that would work for glyc .  (my brain starts turning).



On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, robert luis rabello wrote:

 
 
 Glenn wrote:
 
  In theory it is possible to break methyl esters
  or any other hydrocarbon chain into smaller CH4 molecules.
 
 Design a device that's borrowed from a Babington Burner, limit the
 air
 intake and install a heavy duty spark plug with the grounding flange
 removed.  Use another modified spark plug as the ground and install it
 across
 from the first one.  Apply direct current voltage to this when the air
 compressor and oil pump are working.  If you really want to get fancy,
 run
 the resulting plasma gas through a catalyst and inject a bit of steam. 
 You
 should end up with hydrogen and carbon monoxide gas.  It may not be
 methane,
 but it will burn cleanly.
 
 
 robert luis rabello
 The Edge of Justice
 Adventure for Your Mind
 http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/9782
 
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Engine conversion

2002-12-13 Thread James Slayden

stick with converting it to E85 or NG.


On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Ozan Tezer wrote:

 Hello,
 I produce biodiesel and plan to convert a car engine that works with gas to
 diesel. I plan to use diesel injectors, instead of spark plugs. I know the
 compression ratio is different, but I wonder if it works or not. Any idea
 about it..?
 
 also mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
 http://sbc.yahoo.com
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
 
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Embodied energy

2002-12-13 Thread James Slayden

I know of someone who has a two story HUGE strawbale house in the Santa
Cruz mountains, 12K of solar completely off the grid, solar water heating
for both home, spa, and subfloor heading.  They provided for awesome
passive heating on the south window structure.  Let me know if you want to
visit and I will call them for a walk through.  BTW, also have a Yoga
studio attached to the house that one of the owners teachs in.  Nice
people with some great applications of doing things right.  Just the idea
that your going to use alternative building technology puts you ahead of
99.99% of standard building.


James Slayden


On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Grahams wrote:

 At 08:40 PM 12/12/2002, you wrote:
 This is a bit OT, but I don't know where else to address an audience
 with the potential interest level.
 
 I'm planning to build a new house in a rural area, and I'd like to do
 it in an ecologically sound way. The plan at present is 1700 sq.ft.,
 straw bale walls, minimal usage of wood and concrete,
 
 Research , research, research... did I get my point across? Building a
 house is a BIG financial and lifestyle investment. Before you choose or
 discard any options try to find someone who has a working model of that
 component.  Some research of straw bale that I ran across showed that
 within a year there was significant mold growth. I am sure this is
 climate
 related, yet certainly worth considering.I chose cellulose
 insulation,
 due to it's cost and the fact that it is recycled newspaper.  I don't
 know
 whether this is why or not- but this winter (2nd in this house) we are
 overrun with mice living in it. Not that big a deal, (till you find the
 dead ones trapped in the file cabinet smelling up that whole room) but I
 never considered that.
 
 Also, wood is certainly a renewable resource- your common 2x4 can be
 harvested every 8-10 years on our woods.
 We are considering cob for our next building project.  If you are
 building
 in a place with dirt-(not just sand). This may meet many of your goals. 
 (
 tip- I would purchase a tractor with a loader.)
 
 
   etc etc.
 I've run across a measure of environmental impact called embodied
 energy, which tries to include not only the energy required to
 manufacture the basic material, but also such factors as the energy
 needed to transport the raw and finished materials, the amount of
 labor needed to install (ie, transporting n workers to a site),
 
 This could also be interpreted as just plain expense, which comes up for
 everyone as they try to make a sustainable housing project a reality. 
 The
 more unusual or out of the ordinary, unless very simple, will be more
 expensive in labor. This is a big deal IMO, construction workers are
 seldom
 known for their intellectual abilities.  I chose a manufactured straight
 truss- only so their would be no on site labor cost and associated
 possible
 problems. I found a wonderfully easy to install reflective metal roof
 which
 my workers could install rather than getting a roofer.  On the other
 hand, the insulation factory is 15 miles away,  yet I had to purchase it
 from a retailer 30 miles away, in order to get use of the blower-
 wasteful,
 yet simpler and less expensive.
 
   as well
 as the lifetime of the end result.
 
 
 
 Once again this is an expense issue.  I chose concrete blocks, stone or
 brick, because of so many old building I saw, still  useable or
 reclaimable when clad in this material.  As my aunt used to say- You
 can't
 build a 1990's house at 1960's labor prices. the labor that went into
 the
 brick on a colonial house has paid for itself, many times over. The
 clapboard has only been preserved with many coats of paint over the
 years.  For this however, I think you must use your own common sense and
 think it out. What can you see currently that has lasted . This does
 give
 new stuff a serious disadvantage, but that is just the way it is.  We
 chose an in floor radiant heat system. I have had lots of problems with
 the
 pump needing to be replaced EVERY year after being dormant for the
 summer.  Perhaps it is a bad pump, yet this could become way more
 expensive
 and bothersome than a traditional tried and true heating system would
 have been.
 
 
 
 Unfortunately, this index  (imprecise at best) DOESN'T typically
 seem to address two issues of particular concern to me -- carbon
 burden (atmospheric), and sustainability (how long will supplies
 of the material last at current consumption rates). Maybe that's
 because the bulk of the work was done in the 70's, when such info
 was less significant or not yet emphasized.
 
 Anyway, does anyone know of RECENT research addressing these
 issues as they pertain to home construction methods? Steel roofs
 vs comp shingle
 
 Don't know the embodied energy rating, but a reflective roof will
 significantly reduce cooling needs. One fellow at the DOE said that if CA
 had all white or reflective roofs they would have 100 less smog days per
 year

[biofuel] Interesting way to get the water out of BD

2002-12-13 Thread James Slayden

Hehehehehe, check this out 

http://www.mitm.com/wt_drum_evaporator.html

James Slayden



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




  1   2   3   >