First, the father should be the same individual for both children. The
difference being one child is willing to live a higher law, with the
other needing to be prodded along.
Ok. I agree. Although my guess is that that will make the story a
little more bewildering.
I didn't focus on the Law of
will confirm.
>
> RBS
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 4:26 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
> >
> >
> >Okay, how about 200
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 4:20 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>At 02:05 PM 3/23/2004, you wrote:
>
>>Tell us how you feel about the amendment now tha
I think we should go for both of them. If one fails, we have an
alternative method. As it is, there probably will not be a perfect
solution, but in this case some solution may be better than allowing SSM
from proliferating.
Gary Smith
Steven Montgomery wrote:
>
> At 02:05 PM 3/23/2004, you wr
nority group." Nevertheless, individuals
are also entitled to seek the full protection of the law, as
Steven will confirm.
RBS
>-Original Message-
>From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 4:26 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:
lem.
Gary Smith
Ron Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:39 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
> >
> >
> >Just because
At 02:05 PM 3/23/2004, you wrote:
Tell us how you feel about the amendment now that we know there's
a move afoot to change the language? What's Wilkins
reaction to same? This thing is beginning to feel like an
election year stunt gone haywire.
RBS
The marriage amendment is doomed to failure. That
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:54 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>At 09:45 AM 3/23/2004, you wrote:
>>But only if the current Constitutional powers are
At 09:45 AM 3/23/2004, you wrote:
But only if the current Constitutional powers are obeyed and honored.
When we have mayors in San Francisco and elsewhere giving out marriage
certificates in defiance of the law, then what piece of paper is there
that can establish the law? And when judges overstep
>-Original Message-
>From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:39 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>Just because a judge is an activist judge, does not make him a
>thoughtful one.<
I
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:11 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>At 08:29 AM 3/23/2004, Ron Scott wrote:
>
>> >Obviously these "thoughtful
But only if the current Constitutional powers are obeyed and honored.
When we have mayors in San Francisco and elsewhere giving out marriage
certificates in defiance of the law, then what piece of paper is there
that can establish the law? And when judges overstep their proper role
and legislat
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:10 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
> >
> >
> >At 05:24 PM 3/22/2004, Ron Scott wrote in response to
> >Jim Cobabe:
> >
> >> >Equal protection is
First, the father should be the same individual for both children. The
difference being one child is willing to live a higher law, with the
other needing to be prodded along.
I didn't focus on the Law of Moses. I focused on eternal laws of God.
You'll note that I not only quoted from the Old Te
At 08:29 AM 3/23/2004, Ron Scott wrote:
>Obviously these "thoughtful judges" are simply
>wrong--in light of the
>Church's teachings on this subject, as well documented by Jim.
Must I point out to you, of all people, that church teachings are
not part of the U.S. Constitution, which is the guide th
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:10 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>At 05:24 PM 3/22/2004, Ron Scott wrote in response to
>Jim Cobabe:
>
>> >Equa
At 05:24 PM 3/22/2004, Ron Scott wrote in response to Jim Cobabe:
>Equal protection is already afforded in our laws, for
>legitimate and
>traditional marriage. Nothing in the constitution
>envisions the
>degraded definition of "marriage" that encompasses any
>particular union
>of convenience, aff
It's not about either of you. You two were having a
discussion about the difference between the law of Christ and the law
of Moses. Ron's take seemed to be that the focus with Christ's plan
was in forgiveness and repentance. Your take seemed to focus on the
whole punishment aspect of the la
And you'll note Ron, that I have never judged you, only your words.
Gary Smith
Ron Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> The first reference was to Gary Smith, who is not my bishop, nor
> is he an appointed judge in Israel.
>
>
Gerald (Gary) Smith
geraldsmith@ juno.com
http://www.geocities.com/rameumptom
e explain.
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Jonathan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 6:23 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
> >
> >
> >Grimy Teeth
> >©2004 by Jonathan Scott
>
Ron Scott wrote:
---
Sophistry? I beg your pardon. Has the Church indicated that
people who believe the courts should decide the matter, as
mandated by the divinely-inspired constitution, are out of step
with the church and its teachings? Please point me to the
statement.
---
Others with better
Sorry had to teach a class.
Ron Scott wrote:
I'm lousy at parables. Please explain.
Here's my interpretation. I hope that I am not too far off
the mark.
1) The filth represents sin, generally, through the individual
choices of the children involved. The effects of the filth
represents the effe
Ron Scott wrote:
> I'm lousy at parables. Please explain.
Here's my interpretation. I hope that I am not too far off
the mark.
1) The filth represents sin, generally, through the individual
choices of the children involved. The effects of the filth
represents the effects of sin.
2) The chil
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Cobabe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 7:06 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>
>Ron Scott wrote:
>--
>Thus sayeth the self-appointed Judge in Israel.
>---
>
Well put, Sandy. To me -- others will surely differ -- the
divinely-inspired U.S. Constitution is the guide for how we
should deal with such matters. In asserting that the
Constitution is divinely inspired, God suggests that that
equality, rule of law, and freedom to worship and choose right
from
Ron Scott wrote:
--
Thus sayeth the self-appointed Judge in Israel.
---
Actually, in the church our judges are appointed by inspiration from
God. They are not self-appointed nor is their administration a form of
political spoils for the party in power. Just in case you did not
realize this.
I'm lousy at parables. Please explain.
>-Original Message-
>From: Jonathan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 6:23 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>Grimy Teeth
>©2004 by Jonathan Scott
>
>
till the end of his days.
>-Original Message-----
From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
That's a cop out. A touchy, feely, liberal cop out.
You either need to
>defend your position, or g
At 02:24 PM 3/22/2004, you wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 4:17 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>At 11:10 AM 3/22/2004, you wrote:
>>Thus sayeth the self
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 4:17 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>At 11:10 AM 3/22/2004, you wrote:
>>Thus sayeth the self-appointed Judge in Israel. By
At 11:10 AM 3/22/2004, you wrote:
Thus sayeth the self-appointed Judge in Israel. By the way, who's
pushing for "gay rights" here? I've seen a few here calling for
"equal treatment under the law" for all, which is something
guaranteed by our divinely inspired constitution.
RBS
Yes, but equality be
>-Original Message-
>From: Sander J. Rabinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 2:00 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>SNIP<
>Now what the Lord says to us personally and through the
>scriptures is clear and unmist
Harold Stuart wrote:
> > [RB Scott] I'm inclined to
> > believe that God must be a pretty forgiving God if he's willing
> > to forgive the sins of repentant sinners like you and me. I
> > believe that God wants to include as many people as He possibly
> > can...and that it's my job to do my bit t
Message-
>From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:10 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>Only he can fully judge us, but the Lord calls upon
>mankind to judge.
>Why else have judges in Israel? And we can o
>-Original Message-
>From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:04 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>That's a cop out. A touchy, feely, liberal cop out.
>You either need to
>defend your po
Only he can fully judge us, but the Lord calls upon mankind to judge.
Why else have judges in Israel? And we can often tell if a person has
repented or not, by whether they have abandoned their sins. Someone
living in a gay relationship and pushing for gay rights has not
abandoned his sins, the
That's a cop out. A touchy, feely, liberal cop out. You either need to
defend your position, or give ground.
The Bible is VERY clear that Christ preached repentance. In Matthew
4:17, it tells us that "From that time Jesus began to preach, and to
say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at han
>-Original Message-
>From: Harold Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 10:01 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>
>On Mar 21, 2004, at 3:44 PM, RB Scott wrote:
>
>> Gary:
>>
>> Loo
On Mar 21, 2004, at 3:44 PM, RB Scott wrote:
Gary:
Look, I don't think we're ever going to agree. I'm probably as
aware as you are as to what God taught and what he didn't. I
think are differences are in approach. I'm inclined to teach the
gospel, you seem inclined to preach repentance.
This is
Gary:
Look, I don't think we're ever going to agree. I'm probably as
aware as you are as to what God taught and what he didn't. I
think are differences are in approach. I'm inclined to teach the
gospel, you seem inclined to preach repentance. I'm inclined to
believe that God must be a pretty for
>-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 8:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
At 09:00 PM 3/20/2004, you wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 8:42 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>At 09:00 PM 3/20/2004, you wrote:
>
>
>> >-Original Message-
>> &g
John W. Redelfs wrote:
Hi Gary. My name's Jack, I'm the only son of the listowner.
===
Grampa Bill comments:
Love your style... love your writing... love your dad! Visit us more often.
Love Y'all,
Grampa Bill in Savannah
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly
At 09:00 PM 3/20/2004, you wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 8:22 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>RB Scott wrote:
>>I think you've got it right. T
At 08:58 PM 3/20/2004, you wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: Grampa Bill in Savannah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 8:36 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>RB Scott wrote:
>
>> Seriously, I don't
>-Original Message-
>From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 12:11 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>RB Scott wrote:
>> >> Seriously, I don't
>> >>recall Chri
>-Original Message-
From: Grampa Bill in Savannah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 8:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ZION] Vote Now!
RB Scott wrote:
Seriously, I don't
recall Christ preaching "death" for any offense...well, murder
pe
> Gays and lesbians should stay in the closet.
Their choice. They should NOT be afraid to come out of the closet, nor
should they expect to be accepted.
In my own personal experience, those of my friends who came out of the
closet remained my friends, and were counseled by me in love to change a
> Mankind will establish permanent space colonies by the end of the century.
Certainly.
Jon
//
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
//
RB Scott wrote:
>> Seriously, I don't
>>recall Christ preaching "death" for any offense...well, murder
>>perhaps (but I don't recall it).
Notwithstanding fairly twisted and bizarre interpretations, what
Christ taught was forgiveness, not death.
Forgiveness for the repentant only. That is what he
>-Original Message-
>From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 8:22 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>RB Scott wrote:
>>I think you've got it right. The old laws are off the
>boo
>-Original Message-
>From: Grampa Bill in Savannah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 8:36 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>RB Scott wrote:
>
>> Seriously, I don't
>>recall Christ prea
RB Scott wrote:
Seriously, I don't
recall Christ preaching "death" for any offense...well, murder
perhaps (but I don't recall it).
=
Grampa Bill comments:
But the Christ of the New Testament IS the Jehovah of the Old
Testament and in those days with those p
Gerald Smith wrote:
It might take Iraq 40-50 years to switch over to a strong democracy. So
what? It means our grandchildren's children will live in a world with
one more free nation that isn't run by radical kooks.
Hope springs eternal in the human breast,
Man never is but always to be blest.
Hi Gary. My name's Jack, I'm the only son of the listowner. Since I advised
him in writing the post you are responding to (I'm his history advisor), I was
interested in your reply and decided to respond.
Gerald Smith wrote:
That's somewhat of a fallacious generalization, John. Yes, it is
difficult
RB Scott wrote:
I think you've got it right. The old laws are off the books. If
they become laws again, they ought to be enforced. What do I
think the penalty ought to be for Sabbath breaking? Dunno. Let
me consult with my Jewish and SDA friends. Seriously, I don't
recall Christ preaching "deat
;death" for any offense...well, murder
perhaps (but I don't recall it).
RBS
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 6:42 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>If he did the
, March 20, 2004 12:48 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>Hey, all l did was point out the penalty of the law--in
>the days of Moses
>and of the people in the Book of Mormon. Since we don't
>live under a
>theocratic government, death penalti
rcumstances and history. Neither do you know mine.
Ron
>-Original Message-
>From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 2:18 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>Ron, why is it that you attack the comma
Original Message-
>From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 1:44 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>That's somewhat of a fallacious generalization, John.
>Yes, it is
>difficult and it takes time. Bu
gt;-Original Message-
> >From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 9:19 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
> >
> >
> >How about the Law of Moses (Jarom 1:5)? Contained
> >with
That's somewhat of a fallacious generalization, John. Yes, it is
difficult and it takes time. But you know what, in business management
terms, we see change as requiring time. When a business changes its
culture, it requires years for the complete change over. Behaviorists
will tell you that
I think Christ provided the answer, don't you?
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 12:48 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>Hey, all l did was point out the penalt
AM 3/20/2004, you wrote:
Ah yes, and stone to death adulterers too. Cast that first
stone, Steven.
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 9:19 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
&
Ah yes, and stone to death adulterers too. Cast that first
stone, Steven.
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 9:19 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>How about the
Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:29 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>What laws do you think?
>
>At 06:04 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
>>What laws?
>>
>> >-Original Message-
>> &g
I have no idea.
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:29 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>What laws do you think?
>
>At 06:04 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
>>Wha
What laws do you think?
At 06:04 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
What laws?
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:15 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>At 02:02 PM 3/19/200
At 06:04 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
Why does our membership in the UN have anything to do with it?
Sharon Slater answers it this way:
Attempts to legalize same sex marriage around the world would be
substantially strengthened if homosexual behavior becomes an
internationally recognized "human rig
What laws?
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:15 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>At 02:02 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
>>Gays and lesbians should stay in the clos
Why does our membership in the UN have anything to do with it?
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:08 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
>
>At 01:54 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
At 02:02 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
Gays and lesbians should stay in the closet.
A. Strongly agree
B. Agree
C. Undecided
D. Disagree
E. Strongly Disagree
If the laws were strictly enforced, as they were in the days of the "people
of Nephi," they would have to stay in the closet--to avoid the penalt
At 01:57 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
Mankind will establish permanent space colonies by the end of the century.
A. Certainly
B. Likely
C. Maybe
D. Unlikely
E. Certainly not
We pretty much have a semi-permanent presence in space now--with the ISS.
An actual colony, on the other hand, is far more diff
At 01:54 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
Same-sex marriage will become legal in all or most of the United States
over the next five years.
A. Certainly
B. Likely
C. Maybe
D. Unlikely
E. Certainly not
If the United States doesn't withdraw from the United Nations we will. If
not in five years then perhap
At 01:51 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
The USA and her allies will successfully establish democratic rule in Iraq.
A. Certainly
B. Probably
C. Maybe
D. Unlikely
E. Certainly not
Definitely A. However, a democracy established from the top down, will not
stop, to quote Alexander Hamilton, "an infinity o
John W. Redelfs wrote:
Gays and lesbians should stay in the closet.
A. Strongly agree
B. Agree
C. Undecided
D. Disagree
E. Strongly Disagree
Grampa's bigotry emerges:
A. Strongly agree... except for confessions to the appropriate
authorities if the SSA was acted upon.
Love Y'all,
Grampa Bil
nathan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [ZION] Vote Now!
> >Same-sex marriage will become legal in all or most of the United
> >States over the next five years.
> >
> >A. Certainly
> >B
John W. Redelfs wrote:
Mankind will establish permanent space colonies by the end of the
century.
A. Certainly
B. Likely
C. Maybe
D. Unlikely
E. Certainly not
Grampa opines:
B. Likely
We've got 96 years on this. Look where we were 96 years ago.
Now, if the second coming occurs in the interim
B. This may be more likely than the Iraq question.
*jeep!
---Chet
"If ya thinks ya is right, ya deserfs credit - even if ya is wrong." --Gus
Segar via Popeye
- Original Message -
From: "John W. Redelfs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 3:57 PM
Su
John W. Redelfs wrote:
Same-sex marriage will become legal in all or most of the United
States over the next five years.
A. Certainly
B. Likely
C. Maybe
D. Unlikely
E. Certainly not
Grampa Sez:
C. Maybe
Love Y'all,
Grampa Bill in Savannah
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine!
Gays and lesbians should stay in the closet.
A. Strongly agree
B. Agree
C. Undecided
D. Disagree
E. Strongly Disagree
You need one more option.
F. I don't care. The closest to it is "C. Undecided" I guess.
--
Jonathan Scott
Mankind will establish permanent space colonies by the end of the century.
A. Certainly
B. Likely
C. Maybe
D. Unlikely
E. Certainly not
D. Unlikely
--
Jonathan Scott
//
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// h
The USA and her allies will successfully establish democratic rule in Iraq.
A. Certainly
B. Probably
C. Maybe
D. Unlikely
E. Certainly not
If Bush gets a second term...then, "B. Probably."
If Bush doesn't, then, "D. Unlikely", and all the while the dems will
blame Bush for it.
--
Jonathan Scott
Same-sex marriage will become legal in all or most of the United
States over the next five years.
A. Certainly
B. Likely
C. Maybe
D. Unlikely
E. Certainly not
B. Likely
--
Jonathan Scott
//
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: March 19, 2004 2:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
> Presidente Tomas,
> So, are you saying that instead of trying to help them democratize, we
> should h
Tom Matkin wrote:
> The USA and her allies will successfully establish democratic rule in
> Iraq.
>
> A. Certainly
> B. Probably
> C. Maybe
> D. Unlikely
> E. Certainly not
E. Certainly not. Democratic rule is a privilege that must be earned.
The people of Iraq cannot have it given to them or esta
Presidente Tomas,
So, are you saying that instead of trying to help them democratize, we
should have just turned Afghanistan and Iraq into seas of glass, to get
the radical terrorists out of our hair?
Gary Smith
Tom Matkin wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John W. Rede
E. Strongly Disagree. How else are we going to know which ones are the
tares, if they hide amongst the wheat??? There's gonna be a big
bonfire, and I'm hoping to watch it, not get burned mistakenly because
we can't tell the firewood from the cabinetry in the house of God.
Gary Smith
John W.
A. Certainly.
However, the question will be how long it lasts. Once we start
concentrating on other areas, will the Iraqis keep it? I mean, look at
what the French and Germans have done with their freedom since we ended
the Cold War and didn't concentrate on them as much.
Gary Smith
John W.
> -Original Message-
> From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: March 19, 2004 1:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ZION] Vote Now!
>
> The USA and her allies will successfully establish democratic rule in
> Iraq.
>
> A. Certainly
> B. Probably
> C. Maybe
> D. Unli
John W. Redelfs wrote:
The USA and her allies will successfully establish democratic rule in
Iraq.
A. Certainly
B. Probably
C. Maybe
D. Unlikely
E. Certainly not
Grampa Bill opines:
Well, I certainly hope not! If so, the Sunnis and Kurds are
destroyed! If the rights of a minority are protec
91 matches
Mail list logo