In a message dated 12/5/01 11:45:13 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yup, and my Kiosk made over 100,000 dollars profit for the company that
you are so proudly a shareholder of. Something to think about when you
denigrate the work of others, is they are paying dividends
Dan,
I'm really glad that you like the image. I can say that this is one
of the most emotional experiences I have had taking a picture. Being
so close in time to 9/11 and hearing and seeing the patriotism was
quite moving. I hope that the image somehow conveys what I felt.
Thanks,
Bruce
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Bob Walkden wrote:
Hi,
well, since the whole world's gone mad and nothing is on topic
anymore, I might as well join in.
[snip latin lesson]...
Now let that be a lesson to you, and don't let me catch any of you ever
using the wrong form again or you'll end up in
In a message dated 12/5/01 11:49:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
But you were complaining that Joe sixpack can't get his digital
processed cheaply... Now I think you're just being argumentative.
I've since learned that Joe can take his dinky digitals to Walmart.
In a message dated 12/6/01 1:07:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, aimcompute wrote:
I think Mafud does have a point here. There's a difference between
taking your digital camera into a department store and getting their
run-of-the-mill prints
In a message dated 12/6/01 1:08:29 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mafud wrote:
Cetainly you're not saying I can't vioce my opinion?
Actually, nothing personal I assure you, but this is what many of us are now
suggesting, at least with topics that fall under the
Hello,
recently I picked up a AF400T flash with 4P Sync Cord
B. I consider getting a 4P Sync Cord A as well but
would first like to know whether it is possible to use
the LX simultaneously with
1.) the AF200T flash mounted on the hot shoe of the
FA-1 finder
2.) the AF400T flash, connected to
My house is paid for, I have food on the table, my dogs love me
and I get laid on a regular basis.
I have no complaints.
William Robb
That's exactly what I've been aspiring to for years! Can I come and
visit?
8-]
Cotty
___
Personal
Hi,
how disappointing. I thought from the subject line that it was
going to be an auction for something that priests sprinkle on the
congregation, like holy water...
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You don't stir the water before fishing
- Henri Cartier-Bresson
Thursday, December 06,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll say this and no more: when you ~manually~ set the aperture, the
variable aperture becomes a preset (by you) aperture. Nothing you do
while zooming will (can) change the aperture until (you) change it to a
different setting. **And it does not matter whether you
No, dismiss it from this list. And Chris, you always make me laugh G...
Norm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Folks are starting to take this
stuff personally, and quite frankly, history is just.history.
You dismiss what has happened to millions of people, the
I believe all of that. What touched a hot button was the
implication that non-Linux users are somehow bringing this all
on themselves by not using Linux.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:25 PM
Hi,
can anyone explain to me how a graduated filter works. I think that all
light from all points in the
scene go through the entire filter/lens so how can a graduated filter
darken the sky relative to the
(fore)ground.
Frank
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
On Thu 2001-12-06 (12:14), Frank Wajer wrote:
Hi,
can anyone explain to me how a graduated filter works. I think that all
light from all points in the
scene go through the entire filter/lens so how can a graduated filter
darken the sky relative to the
(fore)ground.
So, if you put your
William Robb wrote:
Thats a leaf
As much as I like the idea of the Synchronicity theme for it's sense of
community, I admit to shameless snapshooting when it comes to actually
fullfilling the obligation of posting an image.
In this case, I was taking the dogs out for their after supper
JCO lamented on the optical and build quality of the Takumars and feels that
they reached their peak in 1971. He also noted that the build quality
deteriorated as Pentax moved from the K through the M and A series. The Ms
in particular were a dissapointment as they knocked the better Ks off the
Thanks, Norm.
Aside from frigtening people with my shocking values I also appear every Friday
evening at Rascal's Comedy Club in West Orange, NJ.
BW,
Chris
No, dismiss it from this list. And Chris, you always make me laugh G...
Norm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You dismiss what has
Richard,
I haven't got a scanned copy of the manual. Pentax USA will send one and
bill you $3 or $4. I can offer you a scan of the wallet card that came with
my original PZ-1.
Front http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/PZ-1a.jpg
Back http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/PZ-1b.jpg
PZ-1p is a
I don't have any old screwmount stuff, but I do have and older Tak 105 6x7 and
the new 45 6x7. While there is a big difference in build quality, I'm not sure
the trade off is so bad re: weight factor...
Norm
Bob Rapp wrote:
JCO lamented on the optical and build quality of the Takumars and
Frank Wajer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
can anyone explain to me how a graduated filter works. I think that all
light from all points in the
scene go through the entire filter/lens so how can a graduated filter
darken the sky relative to the
(fore)ground.
The distance between the filter and
I have a ZX-5 that I need to sell. It is in like new cosmetic shape, and works the
same. The exception being
that the RTF flash does NOT work. The hotshoe works fine however.
The first $175.00 gets it. I accept PayPal, money orders, or cashiers checks.
Please reply OFF-LIST if interested to:
Nice outfit. But it's just not a Pentax. :)
Perhaps it's another collection for JC
to get into? G
The 'Flex would sure be nice. They're fun to use.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1303216130
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
I took my new-to-me MX ZX-M both out
last night while Steven was giving a
holiday concert in his HS band.
The brightness wasn't much different.
I think that's compensated for by the compression
done on the ZX-M size.
The field of view in the finder was the most noticable difference. There's so
Do we all need to take our Pentaxadril?
Okay, Mafud made a comment about how expensive digital prints are to make.
This was in error. All our resident lab technicians have jumped all over him
repeatedly and made sure the rest of us know he's wrong. Is it really
necessary to continue to taunt him
Are not the Palestinian terrorists. with Arafat's tacic blessing, killing
innocents?
Carlos Royo wrote:
The Israeli government don't deserve any support because they
are killing innocents, like they have been doing for decades.
--
Daniel J. Matyola mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday, December 5, 2001, at 11:36 PM, Chris Brogden wrote:
You still haven't answered the question, Mafud. Since several of us
have
already mentioned a variety of labs--both pro and non-pro--that charge
the
same for digital and chemical prints, I'm curious as to which lab has
On Wednesday, December 5, 2001, at 10:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was nothing political in my comment, at least not until you made
it so.
Cetainly you're not saying I can't vioce my opinion?
No, he's asking that when the subject has changed to something OT that
the subject line
The all-too-infrequently-posting Bob Walkden wrote:
how disappointing. I thought from the subject line that it was
going to be an auction for something that priests sprinkle on the
congregation, like holy water...
Curious, but my reaction to that auction was that I really have no
On Wednesday, December 5, 2001, at 10:58 PM, William Johnson wrote:
I finally did find one small corner shop that had it.but, they
wouldn't take the coupon because they don't buy the film from Kodak and
can't get reimbursed.
I understand that. Once we accepted prepaid processing
On Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 12:48 AM, aimcompute wrote:
I think Mafud does have a point here. There's a difference between
taking
your digital camera into a department store and getting their
run-of-the-mill prints back, and taking it to a pro-lab. Same with
film.
I haven't
On Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 01:13 AM, William Robb wrote:
In the work place, one of the things one needs
to realize is the limitations placed on him or her by his
employer. Wal~Mart is not interested in being a pro lab, the
same way they are not interested in selling Armani suits.
We
Sorry for this OT post, but I really like Pentax cameras, lenses, etc, and
have taken some great pix over the years with them. I wonder if anyone else
shares my pov.
Kind regards from sunny Brighton
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 05:59 AM, Len Paris wrote:
I believe all of that. What touched a hot button was the
implication that non-Linux users are somehow bringing this all
on themselves by not using Linux.
One reason that I'm perfectly happy that Apple continues to have
It's the birthday of photojournalist Alfred Eisenstaedt, born in
Dirschau,
Prussia (1898). When Eisenstaedt was 14, his uncle gave him an Eastman
Kodak Number Three Folding Camera, and he began taking pictures. He
photographed many famous artists and statesman and, in 1933, was sent
to shoot
Spielberg's 1941 with John Beluchi among others.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christian Skofteland
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: December PUG
Wasn't there a movie about
The piece of work in question was an estimate on restoration, which, by
the way, was a mere $40 including the print, the lowest price we ever
quote for restoration. The customer agreed to the price in the end, and
then groused about it again when it came time to pick up the work. I
asked
OT? At least it is about photography - hopefully that is what Pentax itself
is about. Have you had the pleasure of reading The Eye of Eisenstaedt? It has
some fascinatiing information about how/why he made some of his favorite
images.
Regards,
Ed M.
In a message dated 12/6/2001 9:09:01 AM US
Sorry for this OT post, but I really like Pentax cameras, lenses, etc,
and have taken some great pix over the years with them. I wonder if
anyone else shares my pov.
You know, Peter, that if anyone came across this post from you, and then
looked at a lot of the other threads recently and
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Take a Chill Pill, Dudes!
In a message dated 12/6/01 8:24:01 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, Mafud made a comment about how expensive
I'm always a little wary taking negative film down to the drugstore and
having a 19 year old girl do the processing while talking to her boyfriend
on the cell phone.
Your point is very well made. It's not where, it's who. Month's back I
suggested we ALL mail our film to William Robb's Wal-mart
GROAN from me too...
Can we forget the analysis and just drop this one?
Come to think of it can we not have an agreement whereby if any post is
getting offensive or irritating we recognize this and simply stop
replying to it? Oops I just violated that one already!
-Original Message-
In a message dated 12/6/01 8:43:56 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
There is no fight here, Mafud. His frustrated tone is the result of
asking repeatedly.
-Aaron
I don't use filters. I peruse the topic when it is first posted. If
I believe that when using Pentax cameras that allow
you to set the aperture at the camera body, such as
PZ-1P or ZX-7 and leaving the lens set at A, the
aperture will remain fixed as you zoom the variable
aperture lens.
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
-
This
Does anyone know if a rechargeable 2CR5 battery is
available for the PZ-1P? Nikon's digital camera model
880 and 885 uses a 2CR5 battery or a rechargeable
battery. Does anyone know if that rechargeable
battery fits and is safe to use with the PZ-1P?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
What features in particular would you like to lose from the MZ-S, and
why?
Presumably what you mean is 'the build of MZ-S but for less money'?
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 December 2001 15:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax
ME - I love my FA 35/2 and my ZX-5n.
http://dscott.home.texas.net/photo/family_and_friends/EvanandJack.jpg
And I lust for the FA 135/2.8 ... and the FA 24/2 ... FA 43/1.9 ... and the
FA 200/2.8.
Currently trying to figure out what I'm saving my pennies for next.
Kind regards from hazy San
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Richard Chu wrote:
Does anyone know if a rechargeable 2CR5 battery is available for the
PZ-1P? Nikon's digital camera model 880 and 885 uses a 2CR5 battery
or a rechargeable battery. Does anyone know if that rechargeable
battery fits and is safe to use with the PZ-1P?
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not a true representation of what has transpired at all. Some
disingenuous PDML members, proposing that such an event can happen
where ~they~ live, kept the harangue going, I merely responded. Turns
out that what I know as a lab is not what they
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: some interesting NG thoughts on digital consumers
In a message dated 12/4/01 10:42:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree 1000%.
In a message dated 12/6/01 8:48:31 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Mafud has, however, six times now evaded the question of pricing at his
lab of choice (though he took great pains to explain how expensive they
are). We can only be forced to assume that he was making it
In a message dated 12/6/01 9:20:28 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. Or those that examine their 3 day
prints, which cost a measly $4.00 for processing and printing, even 36 exp
rolls, and want a credit for those which they don't like.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: Photofinishing
I'm always a little wary taking negative film down to the drugstore and
having a 19 year old girl do the processing while talking to her
- Original Message -
From: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: Photofinishing
I'm always a little wary taking negative film down to the
drugstore and
having a 19 year old girl do the processing while talking to
her
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Neutral countries (was: Re: December PUG)
In a message dated 12/6/01 8:26:45 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are not the Palestinian
We haven't a good equipment argument make the rounds for awhile.
My question,
if you had to limit yourself to two (2) Pentax _primes_ and one (1) Pentax
teleconverter, which ones and why? (i.e. how would that combo support your
style of photography better than some other combo?)
Anyone game?
Everybody has good and bad or good and mediocre lenses.
If you are interested in pro level lenses all the G and HS G series are very
good. Some like the 17-35/3.5 G are way too expensive (costs as much as the
way overpriced Pentax FA 400/5.6) especially when you can get the Sigma
17-35/2.8-4 for
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:52 AM
Subject: RE: Pentax
What features in particular would you like to lose from the
MZ-S, and
why?
Presumably what you mean is 'the build of MZ-S but for less
money'?
I spent about an hour looking at an
I agree completely. Smaller chip size is often preferable because the same
aspect ratio can be done with a smaller lighter lens. Whether anybody
settles on 1.3x or 1.6x remains to be seen.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Are there any current manufacturers licensed to produce K-mount camera?
I ask because I am wonder once 24x36cm CCDs become common place, is there a 3rd
party (Phoenix) who could put out a body we could buy if the P_Gods haven't
shown us the way?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
That kid has got the coolest name ever!
Evan
From: Dan Scott wrote:
ME - I love my FA 35/2 and my ZX-5n.
http://dscott.home.texas.net/photo/family_and_friends/EvanandJack.jpg
And I lust for the FA 135/2.8 ... and the FA 24/2 ... FA 43/1.9 ... and
the
FA 200/2.8.
Currently trying to
If it did there would be no real need for the aperture ring because it
wouldn't be accurate at all. From experience this only happens at the
wide-open setting due to the movement of the focusing group in the barrel.
When stopped down one stop it no longer varies the amount of light because
this
Mir is Ukrainian I think not Russian. Big difference (ask them). I have a
45mm F 3.5 medium format from that company. It's OK but not as good as the
ones from Arsat although I don't think they make one in that size. Their
30/3.5 fisheye is superb. The best lens I have from there is the Kaleniar
It never takes too long for who and what you are to come out. Thanks for being true to
form, Mafud. I'd advise you to find a good therapist, but Narcissists have no faults,
and the cure rate is abysmally low anyway.
GROAN
Regards,
Bob...
Let us contemplate our forefathers,
Yeah but that is what you actually need. The AF sensor array has to fall
into the area observed by the CCD array in this case which makes a 35mm AF
sensor array too wide to properly cover the small CCD sensor. If they are
using the one from the EOS ix APS camera it is as good as any other AF
too many buttons? most critics say just the opposite! Apart from focus
point select it is hard to see how it could have less, unless you drop
exposure compensation and bracketing. You could always tape over the
exp comp dial and you would be left with AF/MF, shutter speed, Drive
mode and meter
The boot time virus check can only read the boot partition files as they are
in FAT DOS readable format. Everything else that is in Fat32 or NTFS format
the DOS scanner can't read.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of aimcompute
William Robb wrote:
Hi, I am having an ongoing issue with my Epson C80 printer, and
am hoping that perhaps someone can help me determine the
problem.
Please see:
http://www.accesscomm.ca/users/wrobb/Artifact1.jpg
The part circled in red is the problem.
Interesting that the blot is the
Hi All, To whom it may concern, my ISP @home went belly up, so
I have a new email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What a thrash! I was offline for a couple of days, what did I miss?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Steven Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Depends because a 2/3 size 5.25 Mp CCD is much denser and has a finer pixel
size than a full frame 6 Mp CCD array.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Brigham
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tailgating is sometimes relative. In my case I know exactly what my reflex
time is (uncommonly short) and from racing on an other car's bumper at up to
140 MPH I've learned how to predict a driver's response based on how they
are driving. On the other hand I never get closer than I know I and my
Don't ask :-0
Norm
Steven Larson wrote:
Hi All, To whom it may concern, my ISP @home went belly up, so
I have a new email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What a thrash! I was offline for a couple of days, what did I miss?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Well that is correct except at the widest setting. If you have a 28-80/4-5.6
lens and set the aperture manually at F4 and zoom from 28 to 80mm you will
end up at F5.6 even if the ring says F4. This is because at the widest
setting the aperture ring is not involved in the actual diaphragm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 12/6/01 8:48:31 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Mafud has, however, six times now evaded the question of pricing at his
lab of choice (though he took great pains to explain how expensive they
are). We can only be forced to
Sorry but for the price of a used PZ-1p you can get a Minolta 700si. Has a
real vertical grip which holds real AA batteries, plus controls. And if you
put the Minolta in single AF mode I doubt you could tell much difference
regardless of the light. Plus you get the nice Omni-directional
Steven Larson wrote:
What a thrash! I was offline for a couple of days, what did I miss?
Not much of great interest. Mostly we have had incredibly long, boring
and misnamed threads on non-Pentax subjects ranging from who to blame
for starting WWII and who is doing the worst things in the
Are there any current manufacturers licensed to produce K-mount camera?
I ask because I am wonder once 24x36cm CCDs become common place, is there a
3rd
party (Phoenix) who could put out a body we could buy if the P_Gods haven't
shown us the way?
Ricoh, Casina, Vivitar, and ??? I guess if there
Well... I had the Tamron manual focus version SP 35-105/2.8 which looks
nice. But in practice, it was hopeless.
regards,
Alan Chan
That looks fairly accurate when you are talking about new lenses. There
have
been some others from the past. Most Tamron lenses were available initially
when they
In a message dated 12/6/01 12:07:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
It never takes too long for who and what you are to come out. Thanks for
being true to
form, Mafud. I'd advise you to find a good therapist, but Narcissists have
no faults,
and the cure rate is
- Original Message -
From: Kent Gittings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: OT: SUV's - was: Illegal Street Photography?
Tailgating is sometimes relative. In my case I know exactly
what my reflex
time is (uncommonly short)
Alright, I use the Z-1p mainly and I like Pentax lenses and many of their
good old manual focus bodies, but not their AF bodies (excluding 120 because
I cannot afford them). I know there would never be any Pentax 35m AF body
that I would like, but I have decided to stick with Pentax because I
What features in particular would you like to lose from the MZ-S, and
why?
The MZ-S was good enough for me, if and only if, it had a higher
magnification viewfinder. Okay, Pentax did choose to produce the multicoated
glass eyepiece again (what I have been waiting for), but then they took away
Timothy Sherburne wrote:
Hello all..
Well, the last thread I started spun out of control like an SUV covered with
an American flag being driven by Lady Di's bodyguard while drinking exotic
cocktails and not wearing his seatbelt. How we got there from the legal
implications of street
In a message dated 12/6/01 12:49:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
So, I assume that you know that all journalists accept that it is there
responsibility to back up claims of fact that they make.
Regards,
Bob...
The questions were disingenuous Bob, meant to
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:21 AM
Subject: RE: Pentax
too many buttons? most critics say just the opposite! Apart
from focus
point select it is hard to see how it could have less, unless
you drop
Oh man, you are asking a question about physics. I am lost...
regards,
Alan Chan
can anyone explain to me how a graduated filter works. I think that all
light from all points in the
scene go through the entire filter/lens so how can a graduated filter
darken the sky relative to the
- Original Message -
From: Kent Gittings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Recommend a 3rd party, inexpensive, WA (15-20mm) lens?
Mir is Ukrainian I think not Russian. Big difference (ask them).
Indeed. Sorry for that...
Artur
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
-Original Message-
From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax
Sorry for this OT post, but I really like Pentax cameras, lenses, etc,
and have taken some great pix over the years with them. I wonder if
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: which 2 lenses and a teleconverter make the best combo?
if you had to limit yourself to two (2) Pentax _primes_ and one (1) Pentax
teleconverter, which ones and why? (i.e. how would that combo support your
style of
This whole thing seems to hinge on using the term aperture and F interchangeably. I
don't believe they are. F is commonly used to denote relative aperture. And some
folks seem to be using aperture to refer to absolute aperture. What a huge urination
contest over some sloppy language
Not
In a message dated 12/6/01 12:49:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Well that is correct except at the widest setting. If you have a 28-80/4-5.6
lens and set the aperture manually at F4 and zoom from 28 to 80mm you will
end up at F5.6 even if the ring says F4.
You're
In a message dated 12/6/2001 2:30:36 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ricoh, Casina, Vivitar, and ??? I guess if there would be a point in
history
where Pentax wouldn't make any film based cameras anymore, there would
have
no reason for other manufacturers to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photofinishing
In a message dated 12/6/01 10:35:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
even the pro labs for 4x6's
Isaac,
That's the *joy* of dealing with the public for you!
I don't process or print any of my own film (lack of time and space - I'm
sure I'm missing out), but I know the deal I want and how much I want to
spend, depending on what film I've used and what the subject material is.
$4 for processing and
Hmmm, my isp doesn't seem to want to cooperate with message rule
8.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: some interesting NG thoughts on digital consumers
And right about here you're gong to tell me how you and ~your~
Walmart lab
~do~ have the facilities and
Mike Johnston Wrote:
William Robb wrote:
What I didn't like was the user interface, though
I just don't recall exactly why. It just had too much stuff on
it for me.
That's my personal reaction too. I much prefer the interface of, say, the
Nikon N80. (That and the FM3A are my current
- Original Message -
From: Matamoros, Cesar A.
Subject: RE: Photofinishing
Interesting. My pro lab charges the same for 3.5 x 5 and 4
x 6
prints. It actually takes more work for them to do the 3.5.
I am not
familiar with labs and just assumed that the 3.5 x 5 was a
'cut' version
Quite true. If the person who did the processing and printng didn't care,
one shouldn't expect good result. Just like one of my local lab which was
once excellent, but now (newly employed printer) they scratched every film
that I gave them, and white spots on at least 1/3 of all prints. They
I think the MZ-S interface *looks* busier than it is. In particular, the
graphics on the exposure compensation and bracketing selection dials
together
look very intimidating. When I learned how to use them I was shocked at
how simple it was, but the graphics make that side of the camera's top
Len Paris wrote:
I believe all of that. What touched a hot button was the
implication that non-Linux users are somehow bringing this all
on themselves by not using Linux.
I apologize if I gave that implication, I really should be more more
verbose than quick quips.
I am an avid Microsoft
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photofinishing
- Original Message -
From: Matamoros, Cesar A.
Subject: RE: Photofinishing
Interesting. My pro lab charges the same
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
