That proof, like any multiverse with no assumptions, includes the
possibility that the earth was supported by a giant over a turtle in a sea
of water and then vanished moments before Magallanes circumnavigated the
globe.
But it add nothing to the beauty of the greek myth. In fact it add nothing
2014-06-25 6:52 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 6/24/2014 2:29 AM, LizR wrote:
On 24 June 2014 17:04, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
If primitive matter existed, and if it has a role for consciousness, or
for consciousness instantiation, step 8, and the argument above,
On 25 Jun 2014, at 03:57, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/23/2014 7:47 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
There is a problem with radical islamism, but the real problem is
in the exploitation of that problem by bandits to hide their
lucrative criminal activities.
This is naive. Bandits do lucrative criminal
On 25 Jun 2014, at 09:40, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-06-25 6:52 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 6/24/2014 2:29 AM, LizR wrote:
On 24 June 2014 17:04, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
If primitive matter existed, and if it has a role for
consciousness, or for
2014-06-25 10:15 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 25 Jun 2014, at 09:40, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-06-25 6:52 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 6/24/2014 2:29 AM, LizR wrote:
On 24 June 2014 17:04, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
If primitive matter
On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:22, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-06-25 10:15 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 25 Jun 2014, at 09:40, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-06-25 6:52 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 6/24/2014 2:29 AM, LizR wrote:
On 24 June 2014 17:04, meekerdb
If you look at a plate and see two apples on it then the testing apparatus is
your eye. Anyone else with properly functioning eyes would see the same to
Apples.
When people tell you about their experience you are not using their testing
apparatus directly. The person might have experienced an
No, its not a psychological thing. A psychological thing would be avoidence, as
in ignoring what people say and do and just going with a feeling. This is
years of observing the actions of your side. It's purely, observing speeches
and behavior, and borrowing from old, Claude Shannon (who worked
Spud: Specifically, it's the use of auditing conservative groups, using the
US IRS, and never, not once, auditing liberal groups; and this by the
admission of the heads of the IRS.
RR: Untrue. As of last year the only org to lose their tax exempt status
was a liberal org from Maine
I always thought the Organian (was that the blond kid in the toga?) looked like
he should've been serving crudites' in a fine restaurant. It wasn't the Gorn,
ss! Or the light globes betting 10 Qwat-loo's? Anyways, God, as a mind
emerging from the universe, gets us away from Aquinas' view or
Brent, Jesus people don't become murdering martyr's anymore, so let's focus
where the problem is. Look at Nigeria, Sudan, Syria,a and Iraq, and draw
together the facts. If it was Buddhists setting off bombs in subways' one could
concede your point. Also, I am not a Jesus person, and don't hate
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
Right off the bat: sorry for this slightly OT post. There is stuff about
discrimination/labeling in the linked video clip below, concerning the
profound truth of All men are rats, however. Higher
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
In terms of ideological nutjobs, I suspect that the solution is
counter-intuitive. Instead of fighting them, perhaps it's better to not
react to them at all. Treat a skinhead like a perfectly normal person and
the
On 27 May 2014, at 01:37, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:53 AM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything
List everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Predictions are great for validating scientific theories but
predictions, good bad or ugly, have absolutely nothing to do with
establishing a sense of self.
We use the usual sense of self defined by the yes doctor.
On 28 May 2014, at 04:36, LizR wrote:
On 28 May 2014 14:12, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:24:39 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
As far as I can see Bruno has a logical argument which happens to
segue into a theory of physics. To disprove it, one merely needs to
show that
On 29 May 2014, at 00:17, LizR wrote:
On 28 May 2014 19:46, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/28/2014 12:35 AM, LizR wrote:
On 28 May 2014 16:20, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I think the more crucial step is arguing that computation (and
therefore consciousness) can exist
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:13 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
the cost of solar panels is still in free fall
Even if the cost of solar cells fell to zero it wouldn't be enough to
replace fossil fuels even at today's levels much less provide enough energy
to enable developing countries (the
Dr. Marchal, do you ever get in conversations with your fellow academician,
Clement Vidal? He's a philosopher at your University? Do you ever get into the
Evo-Devo view?
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sorry for bumping an old post. I comment both Brent and Liz. It is an
interesting subject, and those post here are crucial (for the
undersatnding of the comp mind-body problem).
On 10 Jun 2014, at 10:07, LizR wrote:
On 10 June 2014 16:52, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Yeah that's
A very interesting paper filling out a conjecture by Scott Aaronson and similar to Bruce's
analysis but with more detail. It doesn't so much solve the foundational problem, as
usually conceived, as define what FAPP must mean and quantify it in computational terms
(instead of probability units
On 10 Jun 2014, at 13:37, David Nyman wrote:
On 10 June 2014 04:09, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
They're along for the ride like temperature is alftr on the
kinetic energy of molecules. Before stat mech, heat was regarded as
an immaterial substance. It was explained by the
On 6/24/2014 7:34 PM, LizR wrote:
This has a few interesting corollaries, ISTM.
1. It hints that there might be a way to distinguish the pilot wave interpretation of QM
from the rest, which could be handy
I doubt that since Bohmian QM is just another way of writing Schrodinger's equation.
On 6/25/2014 12:59 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
What is a crime is often defined by religion
That makes sense in primitive society, but religion might have nothing to say on the
terrestrial plane. You confuse religion, and the institutionalization of religion.
and it often includes
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
No, its not a psychological thing. A psychological thing would be avoidence,
as in ignoring what people say and do and just going with a feeling. This
is years of observing the actions of your side.
On 6/25/2014 2:07 AM, Kim Jones wrote:
Muslims accept Christians and Jews as 'people of the book'. They consider that
Islam is merely the latest edition of the same book or religion.
Not merely the latest but THE LAST.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:55 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 2:07 AM, Kim Jones wrote:
Muslims accept Christians and Jews as 'people of the book'. They consider
that Islam is merely the latest edition of the same book or religion.
Not merely the latest but THE LAST.
On 6/25/2014 4:34 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
Brent, Jesus people don't become murdering martyr's anymore,
Well there are those who murder abortion doctors. But lucrative criminal acts includes a
lot more than murderous martydom. The Catholic Church has probably condemned more
On 6/25/2014 7:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Some claim that my problem in Brussels was that in the introduction to Conscience
Mécanisme I make clear what I mean by agnostic (~[] g) and atheists ([]~g). Natural
language confuse easily ~[] and []~. Modal logic is useful if only to explain that
On 6/20/2014 6:10 PM, LizR wrote:
That raptor rocket surely doesn't have /much/ higher delta V than, say, the Saturn 5? No
chemical reaction is going to be that much more efficient, no matter that you turn it
into a superheated flying bomb. Surely for human exploration beyond the Moon you
On 12/19/2013 1:03 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:36 PM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com
mailto:jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is my tuppence about the *hoax-game* of the *fantasy-play*
'teleportation':
It is what I said, never substantiated and placed into
From: meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: Solar power's bright future
On 6/20/2014 6:10 PM, LizR wrote:
That raptor rocket surely doesn't have much higher delta V than,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:46 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Richard, that's a one to many situation you have dug up. The audits by IRS
against conservatives are deliberate and politically motivated. Your side
is out to defeat it's political
On 25 June 2014 17:26, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
The problem is that, in the final analysis - and it is precisely the
*final* analysis that we are considering here - such theories need take no
account of any intermediate level of explanation in order to qualify as
theories of
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:29 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/19/2013 1:03 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:36 PM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is my tuppence about the *hoax-game* of the *fantasy-play*
'teleportation':
It is what I said, never
From: John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: Germany sets record for peak energy use - 50 percent comes from
solar (Update)
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:13 PM, LizR
For me, your analogy (which has been heard before of course) is simple to
satisfy. The Peoples Republic of China, upon hearing John Clark's philosophical
challenge, and diverts its lunar rover to the planet Uranus. All this to the
chagrin of Mr. Clark, who yell's Not fair! Never the less, the
I've just finished reading that review. I didn't find the arguments as
convincing as I hoped I might, especially since I'm sure I've already read
and liked a book by Butterfield (on time I think?) so I was looking forward
to some thought-provoking arguments and maybe something that would make the
Didn't the thugs call themselves Jesus' people who killed the abortion
doctor? was he not a martyr?
JM
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:34 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Brent, Jesus people don't become murdering martyr's anymore, so let's
focus where the
Inventions of ingenious people saving their face in face of failed theories
they subscribed to earlier.
That includes the after-BigBang-Inflation as well. Nobody measured it,
especially not in the units the Big Bang follies are represented in by the
cosmo-physicists.
94% of all attractive 'mass'
Thanks, Russell, you still teach physics.
I fell into bad styling when wanted to refer to phenomena BEYOND it, just
as there was EM before it was detected, there was electricity and gravity
before the words were invented and so on. What may be in the future is not
anticipateable if we have no
On 6/25/2014 11:27 AM, David Nyman wrote:
It exasperates me when people adduce phenomena such as temperature or life as analogous
to consciousness, without noticing that the analogy is, at best, a half-truth. It is
true - or at least plausible - that there might be some discoverable set of
On 6/25/2014 11:48 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
Now I know Bruno will say this is just choosing the wrong level, but the
point is
that it's not just the level which is sufficient for interaction with
neurons, but
also the level which captures interaction with 'external' or
On 26 June 2014 09:01, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:27 AM, David Nyman wrote:
It exasperates me when people adduce phenomena such as temperature or life
as analogous to consciousness, without noticing that the analogy is, at
best, a half-truth. It is true - or at
On 24 Jun Kim wrote:
Who (or what) creates the systems? How can systems not be a people problem?
Systems ARE people interacting in many ways and on many different levels.
I've never met a system involving people that self-created. People ARE the
problem! They invent the systems. Go
On 25 June 2014 21:07, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
If you look at a plate and see two apples on it then the testing apparatus
is your eye. Anyone else with properly functioning eyes would see the same
to Apples.
When people tell you about their experience you are not using their
On 26 June 2014 10:09, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
On 24 Jun Kim wrote:
Who (or what) creates the systems? How can systems not be a people
problem? Systems ARE people interacting in many ways and on many different
levels. I've never met a system involving people that
On 26 June 2014 04:26, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/24/2014 7:34 PM, LizR wrote:
This has a few interesting corollaries, ISTM.
1. It hints that there might be a way to distinguish the pilot wave
interpretation of QM from the rest, which could be handy
I doubt that since
On 26 June 2014 07:05, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Or to quote, Richard Dawkins, Yes, I can imagine there are god-like
intelligences in the universe. Atheist, Agnostic, Believer? Sure. All
three.
(Or in other universes, or branches of the level 1 or
We do not need a mathematical proof that before there was anything anywhere,
there was nothing.
According to my model of our Universe, everything in our Universe is made from
an equal number of plus and minus tronnies. The only property of tronnies is
their charge of plus or minus e.
On 6/25/2014 3:07 PM, David Nyman wrote:
On 25 June 2014 22:01, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Note that I have not argued that the ability to 3p engineer consciousness
will do
anything to explain or diminish 1p conscious experience. I just predict
On 6/25/2014 3:38 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 June 2014 04:19, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
A very interesting paper filling out a conjecture by Scott Aaronson and
similar to
Bruce's analysis but with more detail. It doesn't so much solve the
On 26 June 2014 11:01, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 3:38 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 June 2014 04:19, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
A very interesting paper filling out a conjecture by Scott Aaronson and
similar to Bruce's analysis but with more detail. It doesn't
Gravity is produced by neutrino photons produce by Black Holes with the
destruction of protons and anti-protons. The neutrino entron in the
neutrino photons that reach the shell will be absorbed by an electron or a
positron. If it is absorbed by an electron it will increase the mass of the
On 26 June 2014 10:58, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 3:07 PM, David Nyman wrote:
On 25 June 2014 22:01, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Note that I have not argued that the ability to 3p engineer consciousness
will do anything to explain or diminish 1p conscious
On 26 June 2014 11:07, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Your guess is as good as mine as to what’s beyond the shell. The shell
may be very thick and many universes could be combined in the shell like
bubbles in a Pepsi.
Well, I'm afraid that proves it isn't the Real Thing! :-)
On 26 Jun 2014, Kim wrote:
Traffic control systems are still as dumb as they were 60 maybe 70 years ago
and it is easy to see that the evolution of a better traffic control system
is instantly and totally shackled by the existence of the layout and the
design of the very roads the
Ground state electrons and positrons have no energy. They are self propelled
by their own internal Coulomb forces at 2.19 X 106 m/s. That is why electrons
don’t lose energy and fall into atomic nuclei. They have no energy to lose.
Electrons can capture entrons to become an energetic
Particles are accelerated in accelerators by adding entrons to the particles.
This changes the particles and gives the particles additional mass. So this
could explain time issues.
Much of my theory is supported by equations and derivations.
John R.
From:
Hi John,
Actually, I think you fell into a trap specifying the EM spectrum (which
is well characterised, and has no unknowns about it), rather than
something vague like energy or radiation.
It is entirely possible that life has evolved a way of making use of
some unknown source of radiant energy
The shell is expanding along with the rest of our Universe. It is being
inflated with photon pressure. The cosmic background radiation is the same
everywhere in our Universe, the same as if our Universe was a giant integrating
sphere.
The relevance is that muons could be traveling much
What is you answer as to what is beyond our Universe if it is not a shell?
I just answered your second question.
JR
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 4:11 PM
To:
Perchance! I have just observed, on occasions, your points of view and it adds
up to the progressive mind set, more or less. Feel free at any time to define
your own positions that diverge from all that. As for what goes on in the
world, in mine own land yet, this kind of thing, brought forth
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:47 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com
wrote:
What is you answer as to what is beyond our Universe if it is not a shell?
The universe is not a shell. Rather it is a toroid that turns in on itself
such that radiation can go around the entire universe but not escape
On 26 June 2014 11:47, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
What is you answer as to what is beyond our Universe if it is not a shell?
That was a joke, the Coke vs Pepsi advertising campaign which used the
phrase It's the real thing
I just answered your second question.
Would you
On 26 Jun 2014, at 8:09 am, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
In science, proof is often no more than lack of imagination. We are sure
that B must have been caused by A simply because we cannot imagine any other
cause. So many errors in science have arisen just from this obvious
limitation.
I flatter myself that I look good in green but I'm not so sure about yellow.
(Also, I can't remember what all these hats are...well, yellow is seeking
benefit, and green is creative ... right?)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
On 26 Jun 2014, at 10:36 am, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
I flatter myself that I look good in green but I'm not so sure about yellow.
(Also, I can't remember what all these hats are...well, yellow is seeking
benefit, and green is creative ... right?)
White: the facts. What we know.
On 26 June 2014 03:52, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:13 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
the cost of solar panels is still in free fall
Even if the cost of solar cells fell to zero it wouldn't be enough to
replace fossil fuels even at today's levels
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organian
On 25 June 2014 23:29, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
I always thought the Organian (was that the blond kid in the toga?) looked
like he should've been serving crudites' in a fine restaurant. It wasn't
the Gorn,
On 26 June 2014 04:58, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 4:34 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
Brent, Jesus people don't become murdering martyr's anymore,
Well there are those who murder abortion doctors. But lucrative criminal
acts includes a lot more than
From: spudboy100 via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: American Intelligence
Perchance! I have just observed, on occasions, your points of view and it
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:11 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 7:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Some claim that my problem in Brussels was that in the introduction to
Conscience Mécanisme I make clear what I mean by agnostic (~[] g) and
atheists ([]~g). Natural language
I think the term has broadened out since it was first introduced. Nowadays
it appears to mean believing there are no supernatural forces of any kind.
It also seems to (often implicitly) mean believing that the primitive
materialist view of the physical world is correct, too.
--
You received this
On 26 June 2014 13:19, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
--
Come on man there are more hues than black and white in the spectrum.
Indeed, black and white aren't even in the spectrum!
(Sorry, I'll get my coat of many
From: LizR lizj...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: American Intelligence
On 26 June 2014 13:19, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
On 26 June 2014 05:29, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
So in effect the non-cloning theorem prevents saying yes to the doctor
if you insist on there being no discontinuity in your consciousness. The
Moscow man and the Washington man will be in different quantum states even
before they
On 26 June 2014 09:08, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:48 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
Now I know Bruno will say this is just choosing the wrong level, but the
point is that it's not just the level which is sufficient for interaction
with neurons, but also the level which
I agree with Chris, even though on many occasions (and indeed on this very
forum) I've dismissed the Apollo missions as a huge, wasteful and
dangerous publicity stunt with limited scientific worth.
Hooray! We're going to Mars!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Kim Jones B. Mus. GDTL
Email: kimjo...@ozemail.com.au
kmjco...@icloud.com
Mobile: 0450 963 719
Phone: 02 93894239
Web: http://www.eportfolio.kmjcommp.com
Never let your schooling get in the way of your education - Mark Twain
On 26 Jun 2014, at 5:05 am, spudboy100 via
On 26 June 2014 03:49, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 00:17, LizR wrote:
On 28 May 2014 19:46, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/28/2014 12:35 AM, LizR wrote:
On 28 May 2014 16:20, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I think the more crucial step is
On 26 Jun 2014, at 5:05 am, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Keaton always said, I don't believe in God, but I'm afraid of him. Well I
believe in God, and the only thing that scares me is Keyser Soze.
When Richard Dawkins briefly had me convinced
On 26 June 2014 03:06, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
And that one guy is Mr. You. Yes, it's perfectly true that other guys have
seen different sequences and those other guys are not each other, but they
are all Mr. You because they all remember being the Helsinki Man even if
On 26 June 2014 13:56, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
On 26 Jun 2014, at 5:05 am, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Keaton always said, I don't believe in God, but I'm afraid of him.
Well I believe in God, and the only thing that scares me
On 25 June 2014 16:52, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/24/2014 2:29 AM, LizR wrote:
On 24 June 2014 17:04, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
If primitive matter existed, and if it has a role for consciousness, or
for consciousness instantiation, step 8, and the argument
On 26 Jun 2014, at 11:59 am, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 June 2014 13:56, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
On 26 Jun 2014, at 5:05 am, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Keaton always said, I don't believe in God, but I'm afraid
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:31 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the term has broadened out since it was first introduced. Nowadays
it appears to mean believing there are no supernatural forces of any kind.
It also seems to (often implicitly) mean believing that the primitive
On 26 Jun 2014, at 11:59 am, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 June 2014 13:56, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
When Richard Dawkins briefly had me convinced that I was atheist I ordered
from his foundation one of those lovely black T-shirts with the red letter
'A' on the
On 26 June 2014 14:13, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
Hey! Let's have a T-shirt slogan competition!
I'll kick off with:
I used to be an Atheist but now I'm a Neoplatonist Digital Mechanist
Neutral Monist. What are you?
I want that T-shirt!
How about Ceci n'est pas un(e) T-shirt
Or maybe This space reserved for a Theory of Everything
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
On 26 Jun 2014, at 12:17 pm, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Or maybe This space reserved for a Theory of Everything
Computationalists don't die - they just go to Moscow or Washington.
K
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List
On 6/25/2014 4:05 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 June 2014 11:01, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 3:38 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 June 2014 04:19, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
A very interesting paper
On 6/25/2014 4:08 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 June 2014 10:58, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 3:07 PM, David Nyman wrote:
On 25 June 2014 22:01, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Note that I have not
On 6/25/2014 6:47 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 June 2014 09:08, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:48 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
Now I know Bruno will say this is just choosing the wrong level, but
the point
is that it's not just the
On 6/25/2014 7:03 PM, LizR wrote:
On 25 June 2014 16:52, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/24/2014 2:29 AM, LizR wrote:
On 24 June 2014 17:04, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
If primitive matter
On 26 Jun 2014, at 8:07 am, David Nyman da...@davidnyman.com wrote:
The principal assumption then is that all phenomena whatsoever can be reduced
without loss to some primitive (i.e. assumptively irreducible) basis, in
which process the higher levels are effectively eliminated.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:08 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:48 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
Now I know Bruno will say this is just choosing the wrong level, but the
point is that it's not just the level which is sufficient for interaction
with neurons, but also the
On 26 June 2014 15:25, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 6:47 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 June 2014 09:08, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:48 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
Now I know Bruno will say this is just choosing the wrong level, but
the point is that
On 26 June 2014 15:05, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 4:08 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 June 2014 10:58, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 3:07 PM, David Nyman wrote:
On 25 June 2014 22:01, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Note that I have not argued
On 6/25/2014 8:38 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 June 2014 15:25, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 6:47 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 June 2014 09:08, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:48 AM, Jason
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
