[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-11 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See, we maybe conditioned to stop the car when the traffic lights turn red. You can provisionally accept it, validate it as true, based

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-11 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See, we maybe conditioned to stop the car when the traffic

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-11 Thread Jeff Fischer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bashing other people's spiritual paths is *so* much easier when you can find a way to reduce things to a black-and-white formula, but such a formula is rarely accurate enough to justify the bashing. Amen to that

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] None of this is to say that there aren't too many antidepressants

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you're right I'm sure. And this is a very compelling argument for teaching practises of meditation in a non- movement way,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread Vaj
On Jul 9, 2004, at 11:24 PM, Llundrub wrote: That's all you can come back at me with?  TM is secret mantra. The pearl was thrown before a swine, and now, while you wrestle with Vajravarahi you still don't see her. Fool.  Argue with your self. Noone here is home. Your post was barely

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread Llundrub
- Original Message - From: Vaj To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 6:42 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?) On Jul 9, 2004, at 11:24 PM, Llundrub wrote: That's all you can come back at me

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread Vaj
On Jul 10, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Llundrub wrote: On Jul 9, 2004, at 11:24 PM, Llundrub wrote: That's all you can come back at me with?  TM is secret mantra. The pearl was thrown before a swine, and now, while you wrestle with Vajravarahi you still don't see her. Fool.  Argue with your

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Being a pompous ass is not liberation. Ah, but strangely, it is. :-) If there is no non-liberation, as our teachers have told us and as some of us have had glimpses of, being a pompous ass is just as valid a way to pass

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread t3rinity
Good list Unc, I'll answer --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What deliberate conditioning did *I* go through? Every word you hear is conditioning. I took TM in 1973, SCI and

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread Llundrub
It's a ten million multiplier day so I'm giving it a break. Peace. - Original Message - From: Vaj To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 7:34 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?) On Jul 10, 2004, at 8

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread Llundrub
Being a pompous ass is not liberation.Ah, but strangely, it is. :-)If there is no non-liberation, as our teachers havetold us and as some of us have had glimpses of, beinga pompous ass is just as valid a way to pass anincarnation as any other. Not necessarily as usefulto other pompous

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread TurquoiseB
Good reply, t3rinity. I'll riff on that... :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good list Unc, I'll answer --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread Jeff Fischer
Antidepressants are now the second-largest class of prescription drugs, their sales exceeded only by heart medications. Last year, according to NDCHealth, a company that tracks drug sales, 7.1 million Americans took antidepressants, an increase of 700,000 over the year before. These

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip These statistics are hard to pin down. The link below from a NY Times article about an FDA committee, indicates 11 million such prescriptions were written for children and teenagers. It says this is almost 8%

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Lots of conditioning in the 2nd lecture (Bubble diagram) 2nd day-checking (Theory of Stress-release), group-effect. enlightenment, 'scientific validation', everything, every little thing is conditioning. You will

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Antidepressants are now the second-largest class of prescription drugs, their sales exceeded only by heart medications. snip Mental illness is a serious problem. I want a cure. Are you equating less than

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Being a pompous ass is not liberation. Ah, but strangely, it is. :-) If there is no non-liberation, as our teachers have told us and as some of us have had glimpses of, being a pompous ass is just as valid a way

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A related issue is, even if the use of SSRI's etc was 30%, so what? The implication, perhaps not intended by you, is that this would be odd, crazy, an indication of social decadence. Perhaps even a sign of raging

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A related issue is, even if the use of SSRI's etc was 30%, so what? The implication, perhaps not intended by you, is that this would be odd,

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A related issue is, even if the use of SSRI's etc was 30%, so

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Just curious. Why is that? Do you believe SSRI's tranquilize people? Get them high? Make them happy, oblivious to the ups and downs of

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread Jeff Fischer
Thanks for your response. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe it's pretty well established that the most successful way to treat depression is by a combination of drugs and talk therapy. I know that's what many believe, but I've gotten great

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread Jeff Fischer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you equating less than optimal serotonin levels as mental illnss? If so, that is sad, a commentary on how little you know of the topic. No. That's your characterization. Do you think this whole discussion

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Jul 10, 2005, at 10:49 AM, anonymousff wrote: Jeff, can you define your view of mental illness a bit more? Are people who do the following mentally ill in your view?   Watch Dr Phil or listen to self-help tapes? Definitely! Watching Dr Phil, Dr Laura, or any of those other phonies

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 10, 2005, at 10:49 AM, anonymousff wrote: Jeff, can you define your view of mental illness a bit more? Are people who do the following mentally ill in your view? Watch Dr Phil or listen to

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread Jeff Fischer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff, can you define your view of mental illness a bit more? Dude, you're way over the top on this. I used the term in responding to your post # 61014: Antidepressants treat a deficiency in levels of a needed

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your response. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe it's pretty well established that the most successful way to treat depression is by a combination of

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you're right I'm sure. And this is a very compelling

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Why not, instead, say that Judy has an OCD-like need for perfect accuracy that your writing style doesn't feed properly? To be, um, perfectly accurate, I don't require perfect accuracy, nor do my comments--to Barry or

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Why not, instead, say that Judy has an OCD-like need for perfect accuracy that your writing style doesn't feed properly? To be, um,

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Lots of conditioning in the 2nd lecture (Bubble diagram) 2nd day-checking (Theory of Stress-release), group-effect. enlightenment,

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Why not, instead, say that Judy has an OCD-like need for perfect accuracy that your writing style doesn't feed properly? To be, um,

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Lots of conditioning in the 2nd lecture (Bubble diagram) 2nd

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's interesting. I have never viewed TM as conditioning, but rather as counter-conditioning. Counter-conditioning is also conditioning In fact, and yes, this could be my own blindness to conditioning coming through,

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's interesting. I have never viewed TM as conditioning, but rather as counter-conditioning. Counter-conditioning is also conditioning In

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's interesting. I have never viewed TM as conditioning, but rather as counter-conditioning. Counter-conditioning is also conditioning Only

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See, we maybe conditioned to stop the car when the traffic lights turn red. You can provisionally accept it, validate it as true, based on observation etc. The conditioning is that you connect two facts, the red

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the it in your last sentence, Michael, the experience or the theory? The theory, Judy. It can only be the theory. The experience is always innocent. It's the crazy mind we are talking about. To subscribe, send

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only insomuch as any experience has an effect on the nervous system. If the effect on the nervous system is to create greater flexability atall possible levels as is alleged, then to call it conditioning in the most

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-10 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I guess one way to make the distinction I'm trying to get at would be to ask whether one might have arrived at the same conclusion based on

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Not a rationalization. Didn't you know, Lawson? If it supports TM, or if it doesn't support criticism of TM, it's a rationalization by

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TurquoiseB wrote: To me the parallel with the state of research on new drugs is apt. The latter is clearly science with a profit motive; the former is IMO science with a prophet motive. The studies are

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread feste37
This is so good it deserves to be read again. Maureen Dowd would be proud! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To me the parallel with the state of research on new drugs is apt. The latter is clearly science with a profit motive; the former is IMO

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ME studies are NEVER going to convince anyone of anything. Period. Since I'm stuck at home waiting for a phone call, I'll revise that statement above. There is one thing that could prove or disprove the ME to

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Not a rationalization. Didn't you know, Lawson? If it

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Llundrub
name, there am I with them.” - Original Message - From: TurquoiseB To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 8:35 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread uns_tressor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip For example, one-third of the adult popu- lation of America and many other countries is on a constant prescription of antidepressants. I'd love to see a source for this statistic. I strongly suspect it's bogus.

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip For example, one-third of the adult popu- lation of America and many other countries is on a constant prescription of antidepressants.

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I asked my personal doctor here (whose practice is in the affluent 7th arrondis- sement) about it and he shook his head and said, The percentage among my patients is probably even higher. They come in and request

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Premanand Paul Mason
Actions of individuals who are motivated by fear can more easily be predicted than those who have tasted freedom. As far as I understand, transcending thought puts one in the position of being unconditioned. This freedom to go beyond conditioning and experience deep bliss is likely to produce

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 7/9/05 8:50:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Maharishi Effect is simply a statement from the New Testament and is not new to Maharishi: Matthew 18:19-20 19“Again, I tell you that if two of you on earth agree about anything

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actions of individuals who are motivated by fear can more easily be predicted than those who have tasted freedom. As far as I understand, transcending thought puts one in the position of being

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Premanand Paul Mason
Yes, you're right I'm sure. And this is a very compelling argument for teaching practises of meditation in a non-movement way, without deliberate conditioning. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip From where I sit, I can't tell that his motives for introducing sidhis and all the rest are purely mercenary. The maddening thing is, his actions can be explained by his originally stated intentions to

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?) on 7/9/05 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 7/9/05 8:50:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Maharishi Effect is simply a statement from

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip As far as the Maharishi Effect goes, for all the criticisms I've heard (such as Fairfield's crime rate), I always think back to the study published in '89 (or so) in the Journal of Confict Resolution. That

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip For example, one-third of the adult popu- lation of

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Jeff Fischer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip For example, one-third of the adult popu- lation of America and many other countries is on a constant prescription of antidepressants.

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread TurquoiseB
I'd love to see a source for this statistic. I strongly suspect it's bogus. Originally quoted at a public talk by Dr. Helen Caldicott, referencing a study by the organization Médicins sans frontieres. Is it on the Web? Can you give me a URL? When was the talk given, or when

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Llundrub
 - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?) In a message dated 7/9/05 8:50:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Sal Sunshine
Either that, or there would be a heck of a lot of people walking around bored to tears after doing the siddhis for a few days. Sal On Jul 9, 2005, at 8:35 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: TM rocks.  I honestly believe that if enough people started meditating, as was the original World Plan, it would

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Sal Sunshine
It's that horrible rough toilet paper. Sal On Jul 9, 2005, at 9:11 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: Interestingly, the same organization just released similar stats for France that indicate that the usage of antidepressants here is even higher.

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Either that, or there would be a heck of a lot of people walking around bored to tears after doing the siddhis for a few days. On Jul 9, 2005, at 8:35 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: TM rocks.  I honestly believe that if

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd love to see a source for this statistic. I strongly suspect it's bogus. Originally quoted at a public talk by Dr. Helen Caldicott, referencing a study by the organization Médicins sans frontieres.

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd love to see a source for this statistic. I strongly suspect it's bogus. Originally quoted at a public talk by Dr.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 7/9/05 11:45:35 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Even better is the story of Soddom and Glockamora You mean saddam and gomorrah. Glockamora was in a song from the musical Finnean’s Rainbow Yeah that's it! Glockamora was just an

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd love to see a source for this statistic. I strongly

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip For example, one-third of the adult popu- lation of

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Vaj
On Jul 9, 2005, at 9:48 AM, authfriend wrote: No, that's what you read into what Lawson said. What he *actually* pointed out is that IF the ME was a real phenomenon, studies of Fairfield might not show it. In other words, one can't say anything one way or the other about whether the ME

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip The Dharma does hold methods using yogic flying for pacification but they are very different than the TM model. Understanding what the differences are, I can't see how the ME could really work--it lacks the correct

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Vaj
On Jul 9, 2005, at 5:20 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip The Dharma does hold methods using yogic flying for pacification but they are very different than the TM model. Understanding what the differences are, I can't see how the

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 9, 2005, at 5:20 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip The Dharma does hold methods using yogic flying for pacification but they are very different than

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread Llundrub
I can't see how the ME could really work--it lacks the correct motivation--it lacks bodhichitta.Vaj, sometimes you surprise me at your anti - TMness. Getting together in huge groups to pacify war and bring about positivity is ipsoo facto Bodhicitta. Moreover, the shakti generated is

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] To me the parallel with the state of research on new drugs is apt. The latter is clearly science with a profit motive; the former is IMO science with a prophet motive. The studies are to prove Maharishi a great

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TurquoiseB wrote: To me the parallel with the state of research on new drugs is apt. The latter is clearly science with a profit motive; the former is IMO science with a prophet motive. The studies are

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] It all depends on what the people who *use* the science want to accomplish. To be perfectly honest, the ME research is designed to be used to get people to give Maharishi shitloads of money, NOT to get people to

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] Call me cynical, but that's certainly how it looks to me. I don't think he's ever believed for an instant that the ME would do what he says it

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Peter: In terms of 'evidence' one only has to look at the crime rate in Fairfield and then look at the number of meditators in the community to reject the ME as it is currently understood. --pointing out that

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 8:35 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ME studies are NEVER going to convince anyone of anything. Period. Since I'm stuck

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip For example, one-third of the adult popu- lation of America and many other countries is on a constant prescription of antidepressants.

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I asked my personal doctor here (whose practice is in the affluent 7th arrondis- sement) about it and he shook his head and said, The

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Comments interleaved below, partly to add a thought or two but mainly to reinforce some good posts by other people. Kirk wrote: The Maharishi Effect is simply a statement from the New Testament and is not

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you're right I'm sure. And this is a very compelling argument for teaching practises of meditation in a non-movement way, without deliberate conditioning. What deliberate conditioning did *I* go

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip As far as the Maharishi Effect goes, for all the criticisms I've heard (such as Fairfield's crime rate), I always think back to

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] None of this is to say that there aren't too many antidepressants being prescribed, simply that a claim that one-third of the adult population of the U.S. and many other countries based on the number of prescriptions

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't see how the ME could really work--it lacks the correct motivation--it lacks bodhichitta. Vaj, sometimes you surprise me at your anti - TMness. Getting together in huge groups to pacify war and bring about

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] None of this is to say that there aren't too many antidepressants being prescribed, simply that a claim that one-third of the adult population

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] None of this is to say that there aren't too many antidepressants

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip For example, one-third of the adult popu- lation of America

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...I haven't been follwing this thread, so I may get my ears boxed, but may I ask what the percentages are for the Fairfield area? There must be a lot of people doing TM in a small population zone. Uns. If you

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] None of this is to say that there aren't too many antidepressants being prescribed, simply that a claim that one-third of the adult population

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] None of this is to say that there aren't too many antidepressants

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] None of this is to say that there aren't too many antidepressants

[FairfieldLife] Maharishi effect (was Re: Unprecedented Nature Support?)

2005-07-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip He may have scrambled it himself. Doctors and scientists aren't immune from misquoting statistics either. It's the telephone effect with

  1   2   >