He's the reason I took 4 years of every psychology class he taught that the
school offered,
and the dreaded statistics too. He did genuinely care about each of his
students. Even the
ones that came in with hangovers that slept through class. I'm surprised that
he didn't
keep pillows in his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
loliibhuutasya manaso 'pratiSThasya sharire
karmaashayavashaad bandhaH pratiSThetyarthaH |
Sandhi-vigraha:
lolii[?typo; should be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
I had tantric sex with her for a couple of hours
yesterday...
You are supposed to see the film BEFORE you make
your comments, Peter.
Oh time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tasya karmaNo bandhakaaraNasya shaithilyaM
samaadhibalaad bhavati |
Relaxation (shaithilyam) of that (tasya)
[of] binding[making](bandha-kaaraNasya)
of karma (karmanaH) becomes (bhavati)
from the power (balaat) [of]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
loliibhuutasya manaso 'pratiSThasya sharire
karmaashayavashaad bandhaH pratiSThetyarthaH |
tasya karmaNo bandhakaaraNasya shaithilyaM
samaadhibalaad bhavati | pracaarasaMvedanaM
ca cittasya samaadhijam eva
and
On Dec 7, 2006, at 10:34 PM, quantum packet wrote:
How did religion acquire its extraordinary immunity against normal
levels of criticism?
Uh, do you remember Salman Rushdie? How about Theo Van Gogh?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
snip
Not much like Harvard or Yale actually. The integrity is way
higher
much more transparent at the real universities.
People make a mistake when they view advaitin
teachings as presenting conceptual models of
Realization for a waking state intellect. For the
waking state intellect they are obviously lacking as
you and others have pointed out. It doesn't mean what
they say is false or wrong, its just that they are
--- dhamiltony2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, yours is a good synopsis of how a lot of
meditator people feel
here. It (hold the nose and go) is a moral choice
and also about
integrity. You live in FF and count yourself in the
domes? You go
to the domes? Would you if you live
karmabandhakSayaat svacittasya pracaarasaMvedanaacca
yogii cittaM svashariiraanniSkRtya shariiraantareSu nikSipati
karmabandhakSayaat svacittasya
From destroying (kSayaat) the karmabondage (karma-
bandha) _of_ his own mind (sva-citta_sya_)
pracaarasaMvedanaacca
and (ca) from
The memorial service for Chip Charleston will be held upstairs at Revelations
on Sunday, December 10 at 8.00 p.m. (Not 7:30. p.m. as previously
announced.)
On Dec 8, 2006, at 2:00 AM, mahdeealoo wrote:
You might remember him by his stature. Tall, lanky, dark wavy hair.
Long face. An ear to
ear smile. He looked a bit like a cross between George Harrison and
Jeff Goldblum, the
actor. In the years I knew him (from about 1988) he always wore
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
People make a mistake when they view advaitin
teachings as presenting conceptual models of
Realization for a waking state intellect. For the
waking state intellect they are obviously lacking as
you and others have pointed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know you have to go. But this is really important: Tell me
about
your new line of coffee.
David Lynch Signature Cup. It's the coffee I drink. And I really
love
drinking coffee.
I've heard that. I wish
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 7, 2006, at 10:34 PM, quantum packet wrote:
How did religion acquire its extraordinary immunity against normal
levels of criticism?
Uh, do you remember Salman Rushdie? How about Theo Van Gogh?
er, Martin
Dome Announcements [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:50:28 -0600
Subject: DOME ANNOUNCEMENTS-- Urgent Need for In-town Housing
From: Dome Announcements [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dome-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Community Members,
The winter holiday break promises to bring us the most
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
I know you have to go. But this is really important: Tell me
about
your new line of coffee.
David Lynch Signature Cup. It's the coffee
In Loving Memory
Dodds Chip Charleston
Share a memory
Show support
Say good bye.
When: Sunday, December 10, 8:00 p.m.
Where: Revelations, upstairs room.
(Enter through door to the left of the main entrance
For more information, contact Julie Guttmann, 472-1728.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People make a mistake when they view advaitin
teachings as presenting conceptual models of
Realization for a waking state intellect. For the
waking state intellect they are obviously lacking as
you and others have pointed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
snip Yeah, yours is a good synopsis of how a lot of meditator
people feel
here. It (hold the nose and go) is a moral choice and also about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
I know you have to go. But this is really important: Tell me
about
12/08/2006
Dear Friends of Yogavisionaries and Wisdom Magazine:
For all of you who are enjoying my astrological columns in Wisdom magazine
could you please write or call the publisher to let her know that you are
enjoying reading my monthly columns. She had received a less than positive
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
People make a mistake when they view advaitin
teachings as presenting conceptual models of
Realization for a waking state intellect. For the
sparaig wrote:
What was the title of Skolnick's JAMA article, which
is what Judy was referring to.
No, I was referring to Skolnick's Hoodwinked article which appeared
in Skeptical Enquirer, that's why I said it was called the
Hoodwinked article. That's why this thread is called JAMA Caper -
Chopra did sue Skolnick
jstein wrote:
No, as you know, Chopra did not sue Skolnick.
There seems to be some confusion on this: Chopra at the time WAS the
TMO and he owned MAPI and the Lancaster Foundation. Apparently Chopra
was a Plaintive in the suit. What's up with that?
From: Judy Stein
| karmabandhakSayaat
svacittasya pracaarasaMvedanaacca yogii cittaM
svashariiraanniSkRtya shariiraantareSu nikSipati |
nikSiptaM cittaM cendriyaaNyanu patanti |
(nikSiptam; cittam; ca + indriyaaNi + anu patanti)
And (ca) the senses (indriyaaNi) follow (anu patanti)
the nikSipt-ed [nikSiptam:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
People make a mistake when they view advaitin
teachings as presenting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chopra did sue Skolnick
jstein wrote:
No, as you know, Chopra did not sue Skolnick.
There seems to be some confusion on this: Chopra at the time
WAS the TMO and he owned MAPI and the Lancaster
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
I know you have to go. But this is really important: Tell me
about
your new line of coffee.
David Lynch Signature Cup. It's the coffee
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
snip
Not much like Harvard or Yale actually. The integrity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
-
He is definitely not Guru Dev, Brahmananda Saraswati, reincarnated.
His Holiness has not incarnated on the earth at this time. Why do
you suggest such things?
Hello Jim ! You seem to possess Knowledge due to Sattwa in your life.
And you are right, Guru Dev, Brahmananda Saraswathi is not
The Decider , December 8, 2006 (I read the news today, oh boy...
It is all a blur of chocolate chips and Chinese peanut butter to me. People
sat in the wrong places and wore the wrong hats. The Admiral dealt me three
6's during a hand of baseball, but I folded without revealing it.
The Decider , December 8, 2006 (I read the news today, oh boy...
It is all a blur of chocolate chips and Chinese peanut butter to me. People
sat in the wrong places and wore the wrong hats. The Admiral dealt me three
6's during a hand of baseball, but I folded without revealing it.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turq's description seems closer to an intellectual argument
presented to those practicing more of a mindfulness technique while
remaining in the waking state, so the challenge is constantly to the
waking state
There seems to be some confusion on this: Chopra at the time
WAS the TMO and he owned MAPI and the Lancaster Foundation.
jstein wrote:
No, he owned neither, as you know. (And MAPI, of
course, as you know, was not involved in the suit.)
From what I've read, Chopra founded and owned MAPI
cardemaister wrote:
loliibhuutasya manaso 'pratiSThasya sharire
karmaashayavashaad bandhaH pratiSThetyarthaH |
tasya karmaNo bandhakaaraNasya shaithilyaM
samaadhibalaad bhavati | pracaarasaMvedanaM
ca cittasya samaadhijameva | karmabandhakSayaat
svacittasya pracaarasaMvedanaacca yogii
In the arthouse world, David Lynch's self-distribbed, experimental
Inland Empire will roll out in limited release in Boston and Gotham.
Read more:
'Apocalypto a box office wild card'
By Ian Mohr
Variety, December 7, 2006
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117955277.html?categoryid=13cs=1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
snip Yeah, yours is a good synopsis of how a lot of meditator
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
People make a mistake when they view advaitin
teachings as presenting conceptual models of
Realization for a waking state intellect. For the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
I know you have to go. But this is really important: Tell me
about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
Chopra did sue Skolnick
jstein wrote:
No, as you know, Chopra did not sue Skolnick.
There seems to be some confusion on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote:
Turq's description seems closer to an intellectual argument
presented to those practicing more of a mindfulness technique while
remaining in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
In general, those who don't get the advaita
approach have not had the direct experience of
realization. For those who have, they make sense.
You're
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Turq's description seems closer to an intellectual argument
presented to those practicing more of a mindfulness technique
while
remaining in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Turq's description seems closer to an intellectual argument
presented to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
He is definitely not Guru Dev, Brahmananda Saraswati,
reincarnated.
His Holiness has not incarnated on the earth at this time. Why
do
you suggest such things?
Hello Jim ! You seem to possess Knowledge due
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be some confusion on this: Chopra at the time
WAS the TMO and he owned MAPI and the Lancaster Foundation.
jstein wrote:
No, he owned neither, as you know. (And MAPI, of
course, as you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
No purification is required to experience realization.
Realization is present
One might construe N's orientation as being fully non-attached ...or
not; perhaps he lacks interest in relative considerations. Being
external obserers, we don't know what the true situation is for sure.
It's analogous to a Turing machine test: either a computer or a real
person is answering
On Dec 8, 2006, at 4:54 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Yup. And that of dozens of my friends and hundreds
of people within the traditions I have studied.
They have actually *had* the experience of realization,
unlike some traditions that can only talk about it in
theory and come up with excuses for why
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
No
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
No purification is required to experience realization.
Realization is present at every moment and has always
been present at every moment of one's life. There was
no moment in which one was ever *not* realized.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
---
---Vaj, but this is the initial stage, ...even from the POV of your
Guru, Chogyal Namkhai Norbu, complete, continuous realization
requires at least, time and abundant practice. Perhaps Norbu is
missing an important point regarding bodily purification; and...I
contend, MMY's fund of knowledge
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:41 PM, yhvhworld wrote:
---Vaj, but this is the initial stage, ...even from the POV of your
Guru, Chogyal Namkhai Norbu, complete, continuous realization
requires at least, time and abundant practice. Perhaps Norbu is
missing an important point regarding bodily
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:41 PM, yhvhworld wrote:
---Vaj, but this is the initial stage, ...even from the POV of
your
Guru, Chogyal Namkhai Norbu, complete, continuous realization
requires at least, time and abundant
--- hyperbolicgeometry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One might construe N's orientation as being fully
non-attached ...or
not; perhaps he lacks interest in relative
considerations. Being
external obserers, we don't know what the true
situation is for sure.
It's analogous to a Turing machine
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
drpetersutphen@ wrote:
People make a mistake when they view advaitin
teachings as presenting conceptual models of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:41 PM, yhvhworld wrote:
---Vaj, but this is the initial stage, ...even from the POV
of
your
Guru, Chogyal Namkhai Norbu,
Torquise B srites snipped:
No purification is required to experience realization.
Jim Flanegin writes snipped from longer piece:
Right. The experience of Realization can be had by anyone, any time.
But in order to sustain Realization, purification must occur. I
think it was Muktananda who said
Comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
**Snip**
Still another way of looking at it is that it is
a choice *only in retrospect*, i.e., from the
perspective of realization, but not from the
waking-state perspective (Knowledge is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108
nablusos108@ wrote:
-
He is definitely not Guru Dev, Brahmananda Saraswati,
reincarnated.
His Holiness has not incarnated on the earth at this time. Why
---You mean the question of free will. The jury's out on this
question, which we (and philosophers going back thousands of years),
have gone over before. Choice may or may not really exist; but in
any event, our lack of knowledge concerning the future, and karmic
interactions in general,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
**Snip**
Still another way of looking at it is that it is
a choice *only in retrospect*, i.e., from the
perspective
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mathatbrahman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---You mean the question of free will. The jury's out on this
question, which we (and philosophers going back thousands of
years), have gone over before.
If there's a jury involved, the wrong question is
being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:41 PM, yhvhworld wrote:
---Vaj, but this is the initial stage, ...even from the POV of
your
Guru, Chogyal Namkhai Norbu, complete, continuous realization
requires at least, time and abundant
Yes. I totally agree.
And just as an aside, I like your moniker. I don't use one now, but
when I first posted here I used 'nothoughtdas'. Kind of fun to get to
play with the name/form thing on a forum like this. The moniker-thing
is an interesting part of it.
Nisargadatta never fails to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mathatbrahman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---You mean the question of free will. The jury's out on this
question, which we (and philosophers going back thousands of years),
have gone over before. Choice may or may not really exist; but in
any event,
---Thanks, I believe I read those 3 books, while standing in the
local New Age bookstore for 20 min. I've seen books that taut
certain Gurus with having supernatural knowledge of past, present,
and future. Sai Baba claims to be one of these Omniscient Gurus; but
invariably, (to dream up a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A typical Rick post. Some people can't bear to hear of the TMO being
successful and accomplishing its goals, so they have to stoop as low
as they
can to try to destabilize things.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hyperbolicgeometry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One might construe N's orientation as being fully non-
attached ...or
not; perhaps he lacks interest in relative considerations. Being
external obserers, we don't know what the true situation is for
sure.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108
nablusos108@ wrote:
-
He is definitely not Guru Dev, Brahmananda Saraswati,
On Dec 8, 2006, at 9:27 PM, nablusos108 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:41 PM, yhvhworld wrote:
---Vaj, but this is the initial stage, ...even from the POV of
your
Guru, Chogyal Namkhai Norbu, complete, continuous
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:41 PM, yhvhworld wrote:
---Vaj, but this is the initial stage, ...even from the POV of your
Guru, Chogyal Namkhai Norbu, complete, continuous realization
requires at least, time and abundant
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:41 PM, yhvhworld wrote:
---Vaj, but this is the initial stage, ...even from the POV
of your
Guru, Chogyal Namkhai Norbu,
--- Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I totally agree.
And just as an aside, I like your moniker. I don't
use one now, but
when I first posted here I used 'nothoughtdas'.
Kind of fun to get to
play with the name/form thing on a forum like this.
The moniker-thing
is an
---On a conceptual basis, yes...Dzogchen takes place somehow beyond
all progressions, and (as Vaj so astutely pointed out); doesn't
involve the transmission of Shakti (unlike Muktananda's Shaktipat).
But on a practical basis, (as Vaj so unastutely failed to mention);
one (the aspirant) is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:41 PM, yhvhworld wrote:
---Vaj, but this is the initial stage, ...even from the POV
of your
Guru, Chogyal Namkhai Norbu,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 4:54 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Yup. And that of dozens of my friends and hundreds
of people within the traditions I have studied.
They have actually *had* the experience of realization,
unlike some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:41 PM, yhvhworld wrote:
---Vaj, but this is the initial stage, ...even from the POV of your
Guru, Chogyal Namkhai Norbu, complete, continuous realization
requires at least, time and abundant
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
drpetersutphen@ wrote:
People make a mistake when they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
**Snip**
Still another way of looking at it is that it is
a choice *only in retrospect*, i.e., from the
perspective of
On Dec 8, 2006, at 10:22 PM, kaladevi93 wrote:
You mean like one of Mahesh's beautiful and primary students recently
going insane?
Thanks for reminding me.
I'm sure Vaj might agree, he's mentioned it before here: Dzogchen
begins where Unity
ends. At least that's the gist of Shearer's
On Dec 8, 2006, at 10:49 PM, matrixmonitor wrote:
---On a conceptual basis, yes...Dzogchen takes place somehow beyond
all progressions, and (as Vaj so astutely pointed out); doesn't
involve the transmission of Shakti (unlike Muktananda's Shaktipat).
But on a practical basis, (as Vaj so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:41 PM, yhvhworld wrote:
---Vaj, but this is the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 10:22 PM, kaladevi93 wrote:
You mean like one of Mahesh's beautiful and primary students
recently
going insane?
Thanks for reminding me.
I'm sure Vaj might agree, he's mentioned it before
---Thanks, you're definitely right about the Rainbow Light Body, but
it remains to be seen if anybody outside of secluded parts of Tibet
will be able to acquire this type of body. This is a hope-for goal in
the category of progressive evolution. Evidence suggests that it's at
the end of a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
I know you have to go. But this is really important: Tell me
about
your new line of coffee.
David Lynch Signature Cup. It's the coffee
But you are in direct contradiction to his teaching. You are
presenting both a false Path and a false View. One is tempted to
assume therfore that your View is false Gary.
As mentioned before; as the success of the Invincible America grows
stronger, Vaj is getting more desperate and his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 10:22 PM, kaladevi93 wrote:
You mean like one of Mahesh's beautiful and primary students
recently
going insane?
Thanks for reminding me.
I'm sure Vaj might agree, he's mentioned it before
---Thanks, to back track a few months to Vaj's erronous and distorted
notion that TM is dualist, to repeat another contributor's reply:
that what's dualist or otherwise depends on the Consciousness of the
aspirant, rather than the technique.
But let's take Vaj's Guru: Norbu Rinpoche. He conducts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Perhaps it is the self-sufficiency of TM that bothers you- no
complex intellectual traditions, or direct transmissions from the
Master needed. Just plain old TM leading to plain old Realization.
Complete,
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
