--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote
I just wanted to tell you, Irmeli, that I find this post of yours very
good. I don't agree with everything, but everything is written in a
good spirit.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I liked this post a lot. It is an honest account of Goodman's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Did nobody read this:
..Underline this thing a thousand times.
Real richness is not in the countable wealth -- million, billion,
trillion,
and whatever -- it's not in terms of wealth. In terms of the source
of all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't come back to the mantra. The instant I
realize my attention hasn't been on it, I find that
my attention is on it again.
It's a cycle that repeats automatically, entirely
spontaneously, throughout the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* The infidel Salman Rushdie has insulted our Holy
Prophet. You not only have our blessing to kill him;
if you do you will be rewarded financially in this
life and earn eternal life in heaven.
Actually, I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
* The infidel Salman Rushdie has insulted our Holy
Prophet. You not only have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For t3rinity, a second post on bhakti:
The following is a direct quote from a teacher that quite
a few people on this forum admire, on the subject of bhakti
and the ideal relationship of a disciple to the guru
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no further comments, except to point out that
you found a way to ignore all of the situations you
didn't like, when the point of the exercise was to
comment on what *you* would have done if *your*
spiritual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't followed this thread closely but:
Do people see the tm mov't and or its techniques as being bhakti?
No, definitely not.
How
odd. What's remotely bhakti about it? Of course one can appreciate
or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, *you* define bhakti.
Through my life.
You've already tried to keep people here from
dealing with it critically.
As if I could. But I don't have your missionary zest.
snip
As you define it, which you won't.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
So where
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Generally I dislike in this post the tone of idealizing one person's
work, and the egoistic approach of trying to make his work crucial to
human consciousness evolution in this time.
You *dislike* it right?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
Generally I dislike in this post the tone of idealizing one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe first learn reading what a person actually has said, and don't
just dump on him once he appears. Once more: my post is not about the
difference of opinions about Maharishi that Michael and Irmeli have,
but about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
snip
Generally I dislike in this post the tone
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
Maybe first learn reading what a person actually has said,
and don't just dump
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This kind of Bhakti? Is addiction or attachment to Bhakti considered
desirable?
http://www.polyamoryonline.org/interviews/poly_interview_120905.html
So far I have no idea of the tantric views of Michael. I will read the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This kind of Bhakti? Is addiction or attachment to Bhakti considered
desirable?
http://www.polyamoryonline.org/interviews/poly_interview_120905.html
Here is a really good article on Guru Bhakti by a man who knows what
he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This kind of Bhakti? Is addiction or attachment to Bhakti considered
desirable?
http://www.polyamoryonline.org/interviews/poly_interview_120905.html
Here is a really good article on Guru Bhakti by a man who knows what
he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Now
suddenly everybody here is full of respect for bhakti, why otherwise
this topic *never* comes up in any of your or Irmelis posts. Love
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Irmeli: I have stated earlier that I don't consider Goodman to be a
fanatic. Here you use logical arguments in a distorted way and make
inapt comparisons and generally come across as hostile in spite of
your Bhakti
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both you and Michael do. I don't think that either
of you are nearly as comfortable or secure in your
beliefs as you claim to be. If you were, you
wouldn't spend so much of your time defending
against imagined attacks
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sutras are not, or at least are more than a descriptions of
alternative states. Certainly some sutras are about experiences
(views based on experiences -- not dry conceptualizations). And in
some cases
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When we use other concepts to do so, they are true in themselves,..
This should read: When we use other concepts to do so, they are NOT
true in themselves, but they destroy the other, and are like fingers
pointing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 2, 2006, at 4:30 PM, sparaig wrote:
As far as I can tell, Vaj is misinterpretting/over-interpretting some
text taht talks about how even a nail driven into one's hand won't
takethem out of samadhi. But that's the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To bring up Suzanne Segal again, that's an admonition she
hammered toward the end of her book -- seeing things
as they really are. But she never elaborated on it.
Sometimes I think the work of Byron Katie is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What really impressed me about the teachings is an experience of the
veda I had once, very powerful and definately real as I couldn't have
imagined it if I'd tried. The thing is, the only veda I knew of at
the time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just look at the cross-
cultural range of spiritual experiences -- do Native
Americans cognize Shiva and Brahma when they have
visions? Do people brought up Catholic cognize
Krishna when they have visions? No, of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
Another man I met had an appearance of Shirdi Sai Baba.
Again he had never seen a picture of him, had nothing to
do with Hinduism, and only
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Just look at the cross-
cultural range of spiritual experiences -- do Native
Check out 'Enlightenment Blues'
http://tinyurl.com/4ttdf
So much about responsibility!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Quote to Wake Up To
Many mistakenly feel relieved from the burden of responsibility for
their own behaviour because of erroneous
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@
wrote:
--- tom traynor wrote:
What ever they attempt is easy and
simple as it just flows. How it unfolds is not revelant.
So I may need to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not Rajinis? :)
It would be Ranis of course.
Sal Sunshine wrote:
Sure--Rajettes.
Sal
On Mar 3, 2006, at 12:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did they ever come up with a name, I mean something nice, for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 3/1/06 9:06 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I've never encountered it in TM, to the
contrary. What I've observed has been a
tendency to be deferential to those who
claimed or were rumored
Thanks Barry for that elaborate response to just a nasty side remark
of mine.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
IMO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip uninteresting stuff to
So if you've got another possibility other than the
two
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
If not, then I suggest that you
continue to believe what you've chosen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Even a fundamental Christian may have had an Awakening
experience
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*
If you meet the Buddha on the Internet, killfile him.
Funny, yeah. But seriously I think, you can only kill the Buddha you
were attached to at first. It means
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
Ha, ha, ha, yes, I prefer the 'old coke', God help us all! Thank
God
I got TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
He himself as a 'Guru' is still there. He is the cosmic Guru, not a
persona (Dakshinamurty), always available and guiding those serious
about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And who's to say this isn't their 7th lifetime, or whatever?
That's it. That was also Papaji's point stating too many are hanging
around already too long.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many people were never taught how to approach a teacher or test a
teacher. These IME are valuable things to know, no doubt.
No doubt, there are criteria, laid out by scriptures (ha ha) about
that, but it again depends on the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll let you two talk. You seem convinced that
you know what everyone is really saying,
so it's kinda irrelevant for them to actually
say anything. :-)
Thanks for making it really clear now anyway.;-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael, I actually appreciate much of what you have
to say. And, *unlike you*, I *respect* your spiritual
path. You do *not* respect mine.
That's not true.
If you go back and look at the recent threads in which
we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the comedy of it all is that
seekers on a legitimate pathway to enlightenment..
Now, Barry, when you say LEGITIMATE pathway, you surely do not mean
those with scriptural authorization, or authorized by tradition? I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Michael, I actually appreciate much of what you have
to say. And, *unlike you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha, ha, ha, yes, I prefer the 'old coke', God help us all! Thank God
I got TM when I did!! BillyG.
But the new Coke was better. That's what independent tests had shown.
People just wanted to buy the old image. Same
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also NOT having photographic memory myself, I can see why writing is
important.
I always thought that photographic memory was useful only with written
texts.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO *none* of them was either written by God or
inspired by God.
What a revolutionary claim made by a man not believing in God anyway.
How could he have inspired a book if he doesn't exist? (in your book)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to remember that in Hebrews 16:4 the
punishment for being uptight about *anything*
related to sex was to reincarnate in a place
and time where people argue endlessly about
such things on something the prophets
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The insult of the cartoons is to all muslims.
Oh, really?
You speak for all Muslims, do you?
The insult is directed to all muslims as it has Mohammed as its
object. If somebody feels insulted is another thing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
http://www.amritapuri.org/teachings/message/cartoon.php
More seriously, although her comments are sweet
and compassionate, isn't the reaction
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
http://www.amritapuri.org/teachings/message/cartoon.php
My opinion:
Amma should have kept her mouth shut. Her words border on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But timing and tact require leaders to tread delicately as to what
is appropriate to say at what time.
This is what she did. She said that it's not good to hurt religious
feelings.
Trying to understand why a murderer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup. It's also *still identification*. In the
Buddhist paradigm, the goal is to identify with
*no* point of view or state of attention, but
to transcend them all and identify with *nothing*.
Not identifying with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Yup. It's also *still identification*. In the
Buddhist paradigm, the goal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe Paatañjala-aSTaanga-yoga is also
called raaja-yoga. Why is that like that, anyone?
Maybe because Vivekananda called his commentary on the YS Rajayoga?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
You seem to be taking this very personally, while I simply
try to elucitate the principles. For me this is an answer
to the thoughts and ideas you bring up, so I see it in an
impersonal
I can't speak for Trinity,
Yes you can. Thank you, you put it much better than I ever did.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
why -- if you truly
believe that the universe runs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you're welcome to it if it floats your boat.
I guess there is simply no choice.
See? That's where we differ. I have a choice. :-)
No, the situation is the same for us both, just you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because you didn't have the 'same' You surely had some
degree of witnessing, but you didn't have the experience
that you are not in charge. Or did you have the experience
that you are not in charge, and then
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Its occurred to me that Barry, Jim and others are true children of the
TMO, per their style of response. When someone brings up points about
the TMO regarding oddness, mundane contradictions, distortion of
facts,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever floats your boat. :-)
As long as we're dealing with speculation,
In this case we are dealing with experiences.
I think you're pretty heavily invested in not
being responsible for your own decisions and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has it not occurred to you that you're trying to
lecture someone who in your view does not *have*
free will and convince him to use that non-existent
free will to change his behavior and his beliefs?
That you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
It isn't about one set of decisions/actions that you
would make if you were in charge versus a different
set that would be made if the universe were
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
IOW if you look at it from the ego POV, there are lots of
mistakes and limitations, if you look from the POV of the
Self there aren't, everything
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Great 2 cents. Here's mine. We're talking about
identification, right,
If still identifed you are.
in different states of
attention.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sri Sri teaches the same technique with one of the most important
advanced techniques (of the TM advanced techniques) included for very
reasonable, and IMO it's a much healthier and more grassroot org.
The TM-like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or this.
Where do you guys get the energy for these almost endless mind-numbing
back and forths? Must be some new technique, I guess.
Why bother? I have seen much worse here.
Yahoo!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Now just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
You're wrong about this. I actually don't believe that
realization can be caused
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Now, if this tactics is terribly productive, I don't know, I
just know
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Okay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Ah, the familiar sound of the Judy Mantra: If
anyone heard anything different
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't say what you think I did above.
I was trying to point out the assumption you seem
to be making. You feel, based on your own experience,
that you are not running the show.
YES
Therefore, you
assume that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on that clarity, we disagree completely.
I believe that every sentient being, realized
or not, enlightened or not, witnessing or not,
has complete and total free will. They get to
make their own decisions, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I didn't say what you think I did above.
I was trying to point out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Based on that clarity, we disagree completely.
I believe that every sentient
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But you're welcome to it if it floats your boat.
I guess there is simply
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 2/16/06 11:01 AM, t3rinity at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that I give much to it, but technically speaking they attribute
the wiping out of the Himalaya to an earthquake which would
simultaneausly cause
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:29:42 -0800
Dear TM teachers and Sidhas,
I recently heard that many people are not learning TM because they go
on the Internet and read a lot of negativity. I am appalled at the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
I think from that perspective, you would feel that everything that
happened could not have happened otherwise, that all
your 'mistakes'
in thinking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Now, if this tactics is terribly productive, I don't know, I
just know that this particular body/mind organism called
Maharishi was drawn to it, that is that the supreme Brahman
wanted him to do so...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.geocities.com/rahul_kumar/kalki/tsunami.html
Anyone who thinks the Himalayas could be wiped
out
by a tsunami is living in
la la land.
Perhaps a really big tsunami??
Yeah, like the moon
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Second was that however hard I tried to feel bad
about the 24/7 realization not being as present as
it had been before, after a while I figured out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Old news: http://in.rediff.com/news/2004/may/17aziz.htm
No wonder. Doesn't the movement think he is CIA? He's just meeting his
boss ;-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Conceivably someone could become enlightened by eating MAK.
That's really,really rubbish. That's what Mother Meera told me one
day: You don't get enlightened by eating those pills.I answered that
they are not really claiming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is exactly what I mean. The most important is what vibrations
you fill your homes with - not the buildings. The buildings is only
frames.
While I won't defend vastu, your attitude is wrong as well.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If the orientation of your house or building is the cause of lack of
attunement with natural law / lack of enlightenment, enlightenment
will never happen.
Absolutely! It just means more dependence,more conditioning.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 3, 2005, at 11:19 AM, cardemaister wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Friend of mine
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 3, 2005, at 11:19 AM, cardemaister wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raja Paul Potter, the Raja of New York, whose other areas of
responsibility around the world include Austria, The Netherlands
Antilles, Slovakia, Ukraine, Uruguay, Gambia, and the Republic of
Congo was one of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BZZ!
AMT Wars Fine #6. $32
At this rate, in 7 days we will be up to over one $trillion cum.
Can we all be Rajas then?
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fascinated enough with this subject to make
it its own thread, to see if others here are
equally fascinated.
Yes. I basically agree with most of what you say. This has been and
continues to be my experience.
My
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis was also the one who introduced them to Charles Manson. No
disrespect meant, he had a good voice, good vibes onstage
Charlie?
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B05X1J/103-8106026-1223826
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis was also the one who introduced them to Charles Manson. No
disrespect meant, he had a good voice, good vibes onstage
Charlie?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How is encouraging someone to follow their heart being more
openminded than the leaders of the TMO? The problem isn't with
following one guru, or another, its with participating in the Dome
project while practicing
401 - 500 of 605 matches
Mail list logo
