Re: [Gimp-developer] Screenshot plug-in status

On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Alan Horkan wrote: > I only ask that you take a moment and consider if there might be a way to > make things faster for the user which is where speed really counts. > Could some of the handling of the system clipboard be done automatically > and only when needed to mitigate th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Redo shortcut (was: Undo shortcut)

/me returns from the hurricane, finally able to catch up on several days worth of email. On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > However I *love* the Ctrl-R binding, especially because it lets me quickly > compare the done and undone versions of an image using a single hand with > very li

Re: [Gimp-developer] Difference between 1.2 .gih and 1.3 .gih files?

On 23 Sep 2003, Jeff Trefftzs wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 04:10, Michael Natterer wrote: > > > Just open the failing brushes with ->Open and save them again. > > The plug-in is still able to read these files and will save the new > > format. > > Thanks to Dave, Simon, and Mitch for the prompt r

Re: [Gimp-developer] Status of gegl, gimp 3.0?

On 5 Nov 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Piotr Legiecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Indeed. Websites do rarely say anything useful about the state of > development of an open source project. If you had a look at CVS, you'd > have noticed that there is indeed development going on. Which br

Re: [Gimp-developer] Anti-counterfeit software: implications for Open Source

On 21 Jan 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > What is especially worrying me is that there seems to exist a proposal > for EU legislation to require devices and software to include > counterfeit deterrence technology: > > http://www.ecb.int/pub/legal/c_25520031024en00080008.pdf > > This document explicit

Re: [Gimp-developer] The GNU Image Manipulation Program

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi all, > > Dave Neary wrote: > > Because of its continued excellence and longstanding presence as a key > > free program, I think that the GIMP deserves an OSA. > > Apologies for jumping the gun, I hope I didn't step on anyone's toes > doing this. > I p

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp on OS X

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Daniel Egger wrote: > On Feb 11, 2004, at 4:06 pm, Sven Neumann wrote: > > > Daniel recently posted a list of X extensions supported by the Apple > > X11 server. The MIT-SHM extension was part of this list but today I > > found that at least in darwinports gtk2 is compiled with

Re: [Gimp-developer] Costs estimates

On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Dave Neary wrote: > > Hi all, > > For funding requests for GIMPCon in Norway, it will be very useful to > have cost estimates for the event for the GIMP. > > Could everyone planning to go to Kristiansand send an estimate of how > much money they will need to get there? Ugh!

Re: [Gimp-developer] Press pack requests

On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi all, > > The 2.0 release is getting closer, and there are still some thing missing from > the press pack we want to send out. > > - Could native english speakers who have a few minutes please look at the > "What's new in GIMP 2.0" page (http://wiki.gimp.o

Re: [Gimp-developer] The GIMP Foundation

On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Daniel Rogers wrote: > Hello again, > > It has been awhile since I have done a GIMP Foundation update. There > is quite a bit that must be decided on at this point. Also, people need > to decide how invovled they would like to be. > > My goals for The GIMP really boil down t

Re: [Gimp-developer] The GIMP Foundation

On 8 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > In my mind one of the major reasons to have a Gimp Foundation is to put > > all of our IP ducks in a row. As I've said before I don't think that > >

[Gimp-developer] PDB Named Parameters

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:56:36AM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > [stuff deleted] > > > > The only thing that struck me as missing was the work involved with > > porting the plug-ins to the new API, but Raphaël already pointed that > > out in an

[Gimp-developer] PDB requirements (was: PDB named and default parameters)

On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote: > > How far along is the planning? I have heard of Rock's libpdb, > > which I believe he wants to finish for 2.2, but I hadn't heard > > any concrete plans for the often-mentioned forthcoming PD

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.0.0. out, gimp.org dead?

On 25 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > As some of you may have noticed, for a short while there was a > > www.gimp.org that claimed a release of GIMP 2.0.0., and Slashdot > > confirms it, so it may be true. > > > > The corpse of the Slashdot

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.0.0. out, gimp.org dead?

On 25 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Also, urls like http://www.gimp.org/~tml don't work, but you probably > > already knew that. http://wilber.gimp.org/~tml does work still. > > It works ag

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.0.0. out, gimp.org dead?

On 25 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Not Found > > The requested URL /~tml/index.html was not found on this server. > > IIRC the URL is either http://www.gimp.org/~tml/gimp/win32/ or > http

Re: [Gimp-developer] interface nomenclature

On 1 Apr 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > This linked state does not only affect movement, it also applies to > transformations. Interesting. I did not know that. You learn something every day. Rockwalrus ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Gimp-developer] software patent protest?

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 14:57, Branko Collin wrote: > > I noticed that has gone 'black', in order to > > protest European software patents. A noble cause, for sure, but > > should this not have been announced at least,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp usability tests

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: > >From: Roman Joost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Tasks for the first test (all-day-usage; all of the are common tasks for > >all people, except the one where the indicated group is mentioned): > > Could you also make a proper usability test for the recta

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp 2.0

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Carol Spears wrote: > while i appreciate someone else being the new person to really abuse the > mail lists (try cc and one time multiple mailings). ((check to see if it > is sent to the list or not)). (((forgive me when i screw up, sometimes > -- all i get is mail list mail)

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp 2.0

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Carol Spears wrote: > i have a bad opinion of someone who so easily gets to change things on > an established list. If I recall correctly, it was Dave who was asking for changes to the list, or rather, a return to the civility that once was here. > if you want a friendly mai

Re: [Gimp-developer] status report from the development branch

On 22 Apr 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > > - A plug-in to load and save windows icon files has been added. > > I figured that the plug-in is not working correctly at the moment. Not > sure what exactly is going wrong but there's some debugging needed > here. I'm not sure what the problem you are hav

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] Environment settings & big images

On 23 Apr 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Photoshop handles large images better than GIMP. That's a known > > > fact and it's not trivial to improve. > > > > How, exactly? > > AFAIK they don't load the full image into memory. If you open a large

Re: [Gimp-developer] CVS statistics

On 23 Apr 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > for those of you that are into statistiscs, have a look at this: > > http://libresoft.dat.escet.urjc.es/cvsanal/gnome-cvs/index.php?menu=Modules&module=gimp Obviously, the top 21 on that page should get special privileges. ;) Rockwalrus

Re: [Gimp-developer] OpenGL under GIMP ??

On 30 Apr 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > "Pablo Quinta Vidal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This is my first post to the list and I want to know if its possible > > to use OpenGL under GIMP. > > GIMP doesn't use OpenGL but of course a GIMP plug-in can use whatever > library it wants to us

[Gimp-developer] Gimp Menu Reorganization

Hmm, the last message I sent seemed not to get through, so here it is another time. Noting that several people have expressed desires to improve GIMP's menu structure, I have started a Wiki page which we can use as a whiteboard for rearraigning the menu items. I have even started to group the men

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Re: more GIMP foundation stuff

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Daniel Rogers wrote: > The second structure is the officers. These are the people like the > president, tresurer, and secratary. The duties of these officers are > set in the bylaws. > The board members can be officers and [officers] are generally appointed > by the board.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Joining the GNOME Foundation

On 3 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > There are only a very small number of people who really believe this > > to be still the case. It may still be called the GIMP Toolkit (but > > more & more I've heard it called the GNOME Toolkit), but that

[Gimp-developer] new file-new dialog (Was: Joining the GNOME Foundation)

On 3 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > PS: See http://sven.gimp.org/gimp-new-image-dialog.png for an almost > HIG compliant file-new dialog. This is a screenshot from the HEAD > branch. Looks fantastic! I really like the "hideaway" Image Comment section. Here are just a few minor suggesti

[Gimp-developer] Re: new file-new dialog (Was: Joining the GNOME Foundation)

On 4 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > PS: See http://sven.gimp.org/gimp-new-image-dialog.png for an almost > > > HIG compliant file-new dialog. This is a screenshot from the HEAD > > > branch.

Re: [Gimp-developer] status report from the development branch

On 4 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > What I didn't address yet is the fact that the HIG suggests to > > > left-align labels of UI controls while we currently consistenly > > > right-

Re: [Gimp-developer] Joining the GNOME Foundation

On Sat, 1 May 2004, David Neary wrote: > Hi all, > > Myself and Dan Rogers will be meeting with someone from the GNOME > Foundation this week with the intention of having greater > co-operation with them on things like money. > > For the moment, I am working under the supposition that the best > o

Re: [Gimp-developer] new file-new dialog (Was: Joining the GNOME Foundation)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] accidentally forgot to cc the mailing list. Forwarded with his permission. Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 16:53:32 -0500 From: Seth Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] new file-new

[Gimp-developer] Re: new file-new dialog (Was: Joining the GNOME Foundation)

On Mon, 3 May 2004, Seth Burgess wrote: > Also, from the HIG: > > Its just my opinion, but I think showing 3 places of precision past > the decimal for resolution is a bit excessive and I would hazard > rarely adds any useful information. Good point. > I disagree on the vertical separator - I th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Menu Reorganization

On Sun, 2 May 2004, David Neary wrote: > Sven Neumann wrote: > > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/GimpMenuReorganization > > > > Very nice. I wonder if there's a way to convert between the menu XML > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] status report from the development branch

On 3 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > here's another summary of what's happening in the HEAD branch, what do > watch out for if you want to join development and where help is > needed... > > > Mitch has almost finished the port of the menus to GtkUIManager. The > new code is in use now and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in howto

On 3 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, dgo was started to finally give an alternative to this outdated > sourceforge site, so please consider to help with dgo instead. It's in > CVS, you have write access, feel free to improve it. Do you have

Re: [Gimp-developer] status report from the development branch

On 4 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > By abbreviating 'Scale Y:' to 'Y:', you are forcing the user to make > > an extra mental transaction, namely to first read the 'Scale X:' > > label, which only is partially related to what the 'Scale Y:'

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Menu Reorganization

On Wed, 5 May 2004, Ellen Reitmayr wrote: > Hi all, > > I just wanted to let you know that I'm still there to attend to some > usability issues! > > Roman and I did some usability testing, and we wrote an article for the > German Linux User based on the findings. In the meantime, we were both > qu

[Gimp-developer] Another new image dialog mockup

I took a look at the new image dialogs on the list today, and I made a few improvements. I've posted them at http://wilber.gimp.org/~rock/NewDialogSimple.png and http://wilber.gimp.org/~rock/NewDialogExpanded.png and for the curious, glade files at http://wilber.gimp.org/~rock/newdialog.glade ht

Re: [Gimp-developer] Another new image dialog mockup

On 7 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I took a look at the new image dialogs on the list today, and I made > > a few improvements. I've posted them at > > > > http://wilber.

Re: [Gimp-developer] scale image/layer UI analysis

On 17 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Well, we don't have such an entry and I don't see it being added for > GIMP 2.2. So for now we should IMO keep the changes to the dialog > purely cosmetic. It will help users to be able to recognize the Scale > dialog that they have worked with in earlier GIMP

Re: [Gimp-developer] None

On Thu, 20 May 2004, William Skaggs wrote: > The motivation for doing this is that it seems to me that the existing > edge detection plug-ins distributed with Gimp are rather weak in terms > of output quality Yeah, I've never been very happy with them. > (their advantage is that, because they

Re: [Gimp-developer] None

On 21 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Also I remember that the plan was to move all edge algorithms into > edge.c in order to obsolete the other plug-ins in the distribution. > That tasks has probably not been finished before 2.0. Might be a good > time to do that now. Come to think of it, it mig

Re: [Gimp-developer] plug-in preview widget (another try)

On 22 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > So this API would allow you to queue a redraw even after the buffer is > only halfway written. Of course you would also have to run the main > loop for the redraw to actually happen. Anyway, I consider this rather > bad style. IMO, if the preview takes conside

Re: [Gimp-developer] Usability test - Results available

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Ellen Reitmayr wrote: > > I understand there is quite a learning curve involved with the path > > tool. On the other hand, compare the tool to what sodipodi implements. > > They have clear buttons for every action yet completing the same task > > means kilometers of mouse movem

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Re: Re: Blur plug-in

On 7 Jun 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > > Well, what would you call a script that just puts a menu entry and > > calls convolution matrix with a fixed matrix? > > I'd call it a waste of resources. Actually such a simple task as > applying a convolution kernel should probably be done completely in > t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Usability test - Results available

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Carol Spears wrote: > in the united states, there exists a condition where people are being > educated for a test. teachers that do not teach the content for the > test are removed. > > i think this sort of thing is being introduced to gimp development. i > think it is very g

Re: [Gimp-developer] easy questions

On 9 Jul 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think what the OP really meant to ask whether GIMP requires a > > *pre-emptively* multitasking OS. I.e. one that can interrupt a > > running process that has exceeded its timeslice, even if it doesn't >

Re: [Gimp-developer] OSCon attendance

On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Dave Neary wrote: > > Hi, > > Quoting Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 04:06:38PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote: > > > Part of the results of that is that the GIMP is > > > one of the candidates for the annual golden award (with a > > > large cash prize)

Re: [Gimp-developer] OSCon attendance

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, David Neary wrote: > Hi, > > Shlomi Fish wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote: > > > Heh, my vote is for Valgrind. :) > > > > Well, valgrind is a very nice and useful tool. (I know becuase I'm also u

Re: Scheme [was Re: [Gimp-developer] OSCon attendance]

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in: > > http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations > > enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point? Yeah, really, Little Scheme (http://www.crockford.com/javascript/scheme.ht

Re: [Gimp-developer] removing gimp toys, second opinion please?

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Alan Horkan wrote: > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148027 > > Given that some less used file formats have been removed in recently > releases on the basis of less code to maintain and less general clutter I > suggested that the old Toys be removed from the Gimp f

Re: [Gimp-developer] compose - decompose nitpicking

On 21 Jul 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think it would be even more useful to set the compose mode to the > > last used decompose mode, rather than the last used compose mode (if > > you get my meaning). > > Well, this is doable but it would require closer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-docs] Wording in German: Toolbox

Roman Joost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This mail is for "translating" the Toolbox into German. I wasn't sure > how to translate the Toolbox to German for the manual. But please, hold > your breath and let me explain why. > > So, what do you guys think: "Werkzeugfenster" or "Werkzeugkasten"? I d

Re: [Gimp-developer] Is an incompatible change to generated brushes acceptable?

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Simon Budig wrote: > Hi all. > > I am currently working on some tweaks to the generated brushes (the > brushes you can configure interactively). In Gimp CVS you can > generate brushes like these: >http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/files/generated-brushes.png > > Note, that

Re: [Gimp-developer] "Extrude"-filter and lots of triangles

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Markus Triska wrote: > I'm for now using a quick and terrible hack to fill the triangles (see > attached source if you are curious) and want to ask: Which method do > you recommend to fill lots of triangles from within a plug-in? Is there > a (fast?) Gimp function for this tha

Re: [Gimp-developer] preparing GIMP 2.2

> * Add a new section in the preferences dialog (or add to the existing > Display section) the following options: > * Enable/disable colour management (Do we allow this to be > enabled/disabled on a per-image basis? The filter will need access to > image parasites for that.) I ca

Re: [Gimp-developer] The way forward for Color Management

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Alastair M. Robinson wrote: > From my point of view, I think it's important to tweak the display > module system so that the display modules can fetch parasites on a > per-image basis (rather than just global ones) - this will let me > implement the features I want in the dis

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2 and Script-Fu/Tiny-Fu.

On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Alan Horkan wrote: > > > Replacing Script-Fu with Tiny-Fu could help push Tiny-Fu along a bit > > (ie. with translations) if it isn't fully ready yet by exposing it to > > more users but what is in the best interest of GIMP and its users? > > I know I'd much prefer another stab

Re: [Gimp-developer] Trouble compiling Gimp 1.3.6

On 30 May 2002, Sven Neumann wrote: > yes, Nathan forgot to add gimp-mkproxy to EXTRA_DIST and its missing from > the tarball for that reason. (sound of head hitting keyboard.) Doh! :) Rockwalrus ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.2: Gimp is not consistentlylicensed]

On 30 May 2002, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 10:36, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > I'm not sure how the plugins are used by GIMP. gimp opens a pipe, spawns the child plugin process, and communicates using a relatively simple protocol. > The FSF says

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.2: Gimp is not consistentlylicensed]

On Fri, 31 May 2002, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > > > ./plug-ins/common/gif.c (David Koblas) > > > ./plug-ins/common/tiff.c(Patrick J. Naughton) > > > > We already knew about at least these and I was told (on #gimp I think) > > that it was not a problem. > > Whoever told you that was wrong. Th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Using "cout" to write to a file --- help neededurgently

On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Sugandhi wrote: > Hi, > > My project is to develop an artificial neural network to classify satellite > images. And, this "classifier" is to be a plugin to gimp. But, to "cout" to > a file on the disk --- I am not able to do this, unless I run gimp from the > console. > > An

Re: [Gimp-developer] dependancies

On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Philip Brown writes: > > You did not mention, however, why pkgconfig was suddenly added to > > gimp1.3.7, when it was not neccessary for gimp1.2.x > > Because it's there (even on Win32), it would be stupid not to use it. It also is required for gtk 2.

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp security bug, shared memory

On 12 Jun 2002, Michael Natterer wrote: > David Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes, the plug-ins are simply forked and thus have the same uid. > The patch looks like the right thing to do to me. If nobody objects > for some reason, it will be applied to both the stable and unstable > tre

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp security bug, shared memory

On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Marc Espie wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:48:58PM +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > > > Also, I think that some old systems (AIX? HP-UX?) had problems with > > shared memory segments unless they were created with the mode 777. > > This is very vague and I cannot find any i

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.2: Gimp is not consistentlylicensed]

On 13 Jun 2002, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't agree. The core and libgimp is GPL and LGPL and should be > advertized as such. Noone will ever link against one of the affected > plug-ins and calling them through the PDB shouldn't be an issue

Re: [Gimp-developer] Layer Sets

On 13 Jun 2002, Erin Tomson wrote: > > Unless I'm mistaken, gimp doesn't have any support for layer sets or > folders. Other programs, such as photoshop, allow you to group layers. > The layers inside the group will first be merged. Then the result will > then be merged with the remaining layers.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fractional coordinates

On 15 Jun 2002, Henning Makholm wrote: > b. I think of (1) as a bug in and of itself. The FP-coordinates that a >mouse position is translated into should be the coordinates of the >image point beneath the *center* of the display pixel. Would >anything break if this is fixed generall

[Gimp-developer] Re: "About The GIMP"

Here is my suggestion for a rewrite. Changes are marked and commentary explaining the change is written at the bottom. GIMP is an acronym for GNU Image Manipulation Program. It is a freely distributed piece of software that is useful [1] for graphics-related tasks [2] such as photo retouching, i

Re: [Gimp-developer] script-fu-scheme: Full implementation of Scheme?

On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Martin Bernreuther wrote: > At http://www.swiss.ai.mit.edu/projects/scheme/documentation/scheme.html > there's a reference manual, but I didn't manage to get some functions... > to work. How about e.g. the (do) statement or > (floor -4.3) > (round -4.3) at scheme_5.ht

Re: [Gimp-developer] script-fu-scheme: Full implementation of Scheme?

On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Kevin Myers wrote: > However, not all of SIOD is implemented in the GIMP. Specifically, all of > the stuff that requires a platform specific implementation is missing. > These functions were marked with a "U" in the old Indiana doc. I don't know > if that's true on the new

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Dreamworks, Shrek, and the need for 16 Bit

On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote: > I think it should be visual, a window with the image in 8 bit, and > controls that decide how to get that 8 bit from the original 16 or 32. > Basically black & white points and a curve. I say visual, cos it could > mean what one does

Re: [Gimp-developer] The Occasional Bug List

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, David Neary wrote: > 78064 Entering large dimensions in Scale Image causes fatal error > Memory issue - some things use lots of memory and crash the > GIMP. Enhancement, marked critical - it's a matter of > pre-calculating how big the "new" image will use, and warn

Re: [Gimp-developer] The Occasional Bug List

On 7 Nov 2002, Lutz Müller wrote: > On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 23:05, David Neary wrote: > > Looks kind of plaform-specific... how would you go about doing > > that for Solaris, SGI or Windows? > > Alternatively, if someone hacks up a plain-C-library called libmem or > similar for figuring out free mem

Re: [Gimp-developer] Random number seeding interface

On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, David Neary wrote: > > The real change would be to do away with the toggle, replace the > toggle button with a normal button, and set a random seed in the > spin-box when the button is pressed. For this, I've been using > the global PRNG (g_random_int) rather than setting up w

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: libpdb suite version 0.1.0

I'm proud to announce the first public release of the libpdb suite. The libpdb suite is an exciting new library designed to make it easy for application developers to add scripting and plug-in functionality available. It is based on GIMP's PDB implementation, but much work has been done to improv

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: libpdb suite version 0.1.0

On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:25:23 -0800 (PST), Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm proud to announce the first public release of the libpdb suite. http://www.gimp.org/~rock/

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: libpdb suite version 0.1.0

On 10 Dec 2002, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It is based on GIMP's PDB implementation, but much work has been done > > to improve the programming interface. > > I hope that you didn't follow t

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: libpdb suite version 0.1.0

On 10 Dec 2002, Sven Neumann wrote: > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I hope that you didn't follow the current GIMP implementation too > > > close. It might have proven to work but it certainly has major > > > drawbacks and I w

Re: [Gimp-developer] List of changes for the future 1.2.4 release

On 18 Dec 2002, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd also like to see this one being addressed: > > Saving .xcf on full filesystem hangs GIMP > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101340 > > doesn't seem overly complicated since there's only on

[Gimp-developer] New Gimp FAQ: Call for questions

The gimp web team has desired that the current FAQ's be updated to reflect the current 1.2.x reality for some time. Unfortunately, it has not been able to contact the FAQ maintainer, and the licence on the current FAQ's do not allow for modifications. If we are not able to contact Miles soon, we

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: libpdb suite 0.2.0

Libpdb suite 0.2.0 has been released. This is mostly a code cleanup release. Changes include: * Renamed WireStandardProtocol WireStdProtocol. Hopefully this will save some typing. Similarly, WireStandardProtocolMessage is WireStdProtocolMsg. * The read and write functions in WireStdPr

[Gimp-developer] A Free Software project of interest.

I saw this program and thought it might be interesting to GIMP users and developers. http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ Hopefully Gimp 2.0/GEGL/PUPUS will use some of the ideas there. Rockwalrus ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://

[Gimp-developer] A more flexible last values system for the pdb

Note: this message is crossposted to gimp-developer because several developers interested in libpdb are not subscribed to libpdb-developer. Please do not send followups to gimp-developer. I've been thinking about a better way to implement the RUN_WITH_LAST_VALUES functionality in libpdb. The curr

Re: [Gimp-developer] List of changes for the future 1.2.4 release

On 20 Dec 2002, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Note that just checking write() or fwrite() return values may not be > > > enough: some filesystems delay the error indictation until close() is > > > called on the fd. So this bug may well be influen

Re: [Gimp-developer] Just managed to build HEAD GIMP with autotoolson Win32...

On 31 Dec 2002, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hmm. You mean libgimptool isn't really used at all currently? It would > > be helpful to have some short READMEs in the libgimp* directories > > (especially libgimpwidgets, libgimpproxy and libgimptool) t

Re: [Gimp-developer] How to Submit Fixes and Enhancements?

On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Kevin Myers wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have a few simple enhancements bug fixes that I would like to provide for > the GIMP, and I'm working with it enough that I anticipate more to come. > How is the best way for me to provide these changes? I've briefly checked > into using C

[Gimp-developer] New Gimp FAQ: Call for Answers

This is the the Call for Answers for the "clean room" reimplementation of the GIMP User FAQ. Please send [EMAIL PROTECTED] a message stating your intent to write an answer, and CC it to the lists so that no one else takes that question. If I do not recieve an answer within three days, I will open

Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpToolGui

On 30 Jan 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > when I updated my gimp tree this morning I was surprised to see this > commit: > > 2003-01-30 Nathan Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * app/tools/gimptoolgui.[ch]: GimpToolGui, a new class descended > from GimpObject to be used

[Gimp-developer] blizzards, mononucleosis, and tool plug-in TODOitems

I'm sorry that I haven't been able to do much GIMP participation in the last several months. I don't want to bore everyone here with details of my personal life, so suffice it to say I haven't been able to spend much time hacking or even replying to email. I regret any inconvenience this has caus

Re: [Gimp-developer] blizzards, mononucleosis, and tool plug-in TODOitems

On 30 Mar 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What needs to be done for the next release is a major cleanup of the > tools. I agree. > Part of this cleanup should be a proper documentation on how to > write a GIMP

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

On 31 Mar 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > I'd even prefer to have everything that is related to this widget be > under the same namespace. Unfortunately GimpPreview is already taken, so > we either need to change the name of the core object or find a new one > for the plug-in preview. (off-the-cuff)

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Ernst Lippe wrote: > On the contrary, there appear to be lots of acceptable > names. > I am suprised that nobody has suggested YetAnotherGimpPreview :) How about GimpPluginView? GimpSample? GimpTheWidgetFormerlyKnownAsPreview? GimpFancyPreview? GimpMcPreview? GimpExample? Gimp

[Gimp-developer] Tool API [LONG!]

Here is a list of all the symbols currently used by the current tools, courtesy of nm tools/*.o paint/*.o | cut -b 10- | grep ^T | cut -b 3- | sort | uniq stdlib, glib, gdk, pango, and gtk calls have been eliminated from this list. The big things that stand out are accessing the global "the_gimp"

Re: [Gimp-developer] running gimp withou't make install?

On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > But what I do need now is a faster way to go from edit code to running gimp. > Make Install asctually eats out a lot of time on my system. Is it possible to > run the gimp-1.3 binary generated from make straight, without make-installing > it? Of cours

Re: [Gimp-developer] New thread on GIMP 1.3+

My vote is for 1.4. Otherwise, the Slashdot headline we will get is "GIMP 2.0 Fails to Deliver Promised Features" Rockwalrus ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Macro Recorder 2nd Try

On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> In short the approach (more info in bugzilla) : > >> - Intercept every PDB call if a macro recorder instance is running. > > > > The c

Re: [Gimp-developer] MMX in 1.3 tree

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:52:08AM +0200, David Neary wrote: > I don't think there should be a % in the list of clobbered registers. What's > worse, I don't even think most versions of gcc know about MMX registers at > all (I might be mistaken, th

  1   2   >