Hi,
Since my first touch with z/os,I have learned to issue 'tso sdsf' in ISPF
to invoke sdsf.Yesterday I'm doing some customization for my tso/ispf
session---adding some commands to my own ispf command table.
One of customized ISPF commands is 'sd',I want to use it to go directly
to sdsf and I
John, The function performed by the RMM TPRACF options depends on how you
have RACF set up. If you were to inactivate TAPEVOL class rmm stops
creating and deleting TAPEVOL profiles for you.
With z/OS 1.8 we provide another option for TPRACF that will stop creation
of profiles but enable deletion;
I just added new member to SYSPROC library.
The command
TSO membername
does not work, I believe, because of IKJEXEC entry in COFVLF00.
I could recycle VLF, but...
Q: Does exist a method for refreshing command list without recycling VLF ?
Should I use VLFNOTE ?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz,
Hi,
I received a note mentioning a vendor is developing an encryptrion
product. They mentioned in the note: The OPEN intercept will still
need to check the SMS ACS to determine which encryption method to use.
My question is what is the diffenece between an encryption routine for
SMS -vs-
I waiting toi here back from IBM on the cost of : IBM DFSMSdss Encryption
feature
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 8:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Encryption SMS
Hi,
I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bruno Sugliani
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:13:23 -0600, Ed Gould
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not want to be responsible to management if a disaster struck
after you initiated the snap short Its just like any
Ed Gould wrote:
Some other sysprogs that I know don't know about it but they don't go
SHARE. I would hate to think that this apparently nice facility is
limited to SHARE attendees. I am not against this per se..
C'mon, Ed. Of course it's not limited to SHARE attendees. Why
would we want
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:27:19 +0800 Johnny Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Since my first touch with z/os,I have learned to issue 'tso sdsf' in ISPF
:to invoke sdsf.Yesterday I'm doing some customization for my tso/ispf
:session---adding some commands to my own ispf command table.
:One of
Kathleen McLaughlin wrote:
I’m currently reviewing our SYS1.PARMLIB(IEASYS00) member and have found
the following three parameters specified:
APG=07
ILMLIB=SYS1.ILMLIB
ILMMODE=NONE
I have searched both the z/OS V1R4 and z/OS V1R6 “MVS Initialization and
Tuning Reference” books and am
Hello,
Is there a command to stop a started task that stays in the starting status
because of an enqueue conflict on a dataset? I try cancel and force but it
didn't work. I don't want to stop the other address space that has got the
dataset at first.
Thank you!
Francois Pare
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francois Paré
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: How to stop a started task in starting status
Hello,
Is there a command to stop a started
On Mar 13, 2006, at 8:18 AM, John Eells wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Some other sysprogs that I know don't know about it but they don't
go SHARE. I would hate to think that this apparently nice
facility is limited to SHARE attendees. I am not against this per
se..
C'mon, Ed. Of course
On Sunday 12 March 2006 16:43, R.S. wrote:
D SMF shows what is current (ACTIVE) SYS1.MANx dataset.
I'd like to get the information in my program. Can I find it in CVT or
other control block ?
Look at the code in SHOWMVS which displays a lot of SMF parms and info.
SHOWMVS is in file 492 of
Hi list
I have written an MPF EXIT to issuing operator commands :
i have used an MCSOPER REQUEST=ACTIVATE to define an EMCS
console and then MGCRE to issue the command ,after waiting
for the response to become available, MCSOPMSG REQUEST=GETMSG
to actually retrieve it, and finally MCSOPER
Try C STARTING,A=, where is the ASID in hex format.
Regards,
Philippe Leite
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
On 3/13/06, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:27:19 +0800 Johnny Luo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Since my first touch with z/os,I have learned to issue 'tso sdsf' in
ISPF
:to invoke sdsf.Yesterday I'm doing some customization for my tso/ispf
:session---adding
Another question.A little off-topic,but it's relevant to tso/ispf,
so I raise it here.
When I get the tso ready,I always use 'ispf' to invoke ISPF.
So I assume it a tso command,but strangely I can not find
this command in TSO Command Reference.But when I
issue 'tso help ispf' in ISPF,I can get
We are exploring our options to meet a requirement to do a secure FTP
from the Mainframe. I was wondering what others have done in this area.
Any product suggestions or methodologies to accomplish this?
Thanks
***
Cletus McGee
Technical Services
(334) 394-3320
Have
It is locate in SISPLPA (ISP. SISPLPA for example) ... (So in LPA)
CAPRON Romain
Ingénieur Système
MATMUT, France
-Message d'origine-
De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Johnny Luo
Envoyé : lundi 13 mars 2006 16:45
À : IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Objet :
When I get the tso ready,I always use 'ispf' to invoke ISPF.
So I assume it a tso command,but strangely I can not find
this command in TSO Command Reference.But when I
issue 'tso help ispf' in ISPF,I can get tutorial about this
command.
So,why Command Reference doesn't talk about this
command?
In a message dated 3/13/2006 9:45:09 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So,why Command Reference doesn't talk about this
command?
It's a program product and has it's own separate FMID and manuals.
It's not shipped as a part of TSO.
Cletus,
Your Industry may dictate a solution.
For Example
Financial - Connect:Direct
International - HARBOR/FT
Commercial - FTP SSH
Contact the site where you must transfer to and from and gather a consensus
of product standards from them.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From:
It's a TSO command processor, but not a TSO command. Other products may
also introduce TSO CPs into your environment and those added CPs will
not be documented in the TSO Command Reference either.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
I would, however, concur that the copy is not instantaneous.
Establishing the FlashCopy relationship for 300 - 400 drives takes us
somewhere on the order of a minute, so you must, for example, suspend
DB2 updates and some other update activities during the establishment
process to be sure that
On 13/03/06, McGee, Cletus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are exploring our options to meet a requirement to do a secure FTP
from the Mainframe. I was wondering what others have done in this area.
Any product suggestions or methodologies to accomplish this?
We have used a SSH tunnel carrying FTP.
Ed, pay attention. John could not have stated it any more clearly : Of
course it's not limited to SHARE attendees.
But you come right back and say that it is.
As to awareness of this process, there are many ways it has been brought
to the public awareness. You could read IBM web sites. Cheryl
we're just in the throes of it now. looks like ibm's free 5655-m23 does
the job
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James,
Wow, does your shop run COPICS?
I have good and bad news for you,
The good news first, LLC is still supported sort off as
of IMS V8.
By support the macro that generates the low level code
checker is still
around and has actually been maintained ... the Macro
name is DFSNN and
the most
Issue D GRS,C to get the ASID it will show name and STARTING of the waiting STC
Issue C STARTING,A= using the ASID you obtained from the D GRS,C.
Thanks,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL
Tom Harper wrote:
I knew z machines were awesome, but this is amazing: 80 times the
world's electrical power usage (for a fraction of a second):
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060313.html
It is good to distinguish power (Watt-measured) and energy
(Joul-measure, or kWh, which is 3.6MJ).
Only the name!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Powerful z machine
Tom Harper wrote:
I knew z machines were awesome, but this is amazing: 80
From Back to the Future that's Jiga Watts!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/13/2006 11:57:32 AM
Tom Harper wrote:
I knew z machines were awesome, but this is amazing: 80 times the
world's electrical power usage (for a fraction of a second):
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060313.html
It is good
John Eells wrote:
HOLDDATA has indeed been around for quite a while (and a big
improvement
it was over EXCLUDE lists, too).
However, Enhanced HOLDDATA, which includes HOLDs for HIPERs, has not
been around for 20 years. In fact, the pre-GA pilot progam wasn't even
20 years ago (more like
Regarding an accidental CPC deactivate...
If you deactivate a CPC with active systems you should be receiving a
warning message identifying active systems by name along with a message
stating the action being performed is disruptive before you can proceed.
Regarding accidental object
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
03/13/2006
at 05:27 PM, Johnny Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Then sunddently I think of the 'tso sdsf' .It seems 'sdsf' should be
a TSO command,but after searching TSO command reference, I'm
bewilered.There is no tso command named 'sdsf'.
The TSO Commands Reference
John,
What was SmartMVS? I don't recall ever hearing about that. Or maybe I
just forgot. Was that something you had to pay for? Maybe it was one
of those things only available at Share. (A little humour).
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
PH Mining Equipment
414-671-7849
Milwaukee,
In a message dated 3/13/2006 1:03:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What was SmartMVS? I don't recall ever hearing about that. Or maybe I
just forgot. Was that something you had to pay for? Maybe it was one
of those things only available at Share. (A little
On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:18 PM, John Eells wrote:
John Eells wrote:
HOLDDATA has indeed been around for quite a while (and a big
improvement
it was over EXCLUDE lists, too).
However, Enhanced HOLDDATA, which includes HOLDs for HIPERs, has
not been around for 20 years. In fact, the pre-GA
(Doggone it, submitted to bit.listserv first. Sorry.)
Now that SHARE in Seattle is done, we have a whopping six to seven
weeks to produce the schedule for SHARE 107 in Baltimore this summer.
That means
In a recent note, Bruce Black said:
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:11:16 -0500
Flashcopy has a consistent flash mode that makes it unnecessary to
suspend application updates, as long as the application is a logged
system doing dependant writes ...
I'm unfamiliar with the terms, but
On Mar 13, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) wrote:
Ed, pay attention. John could not have stated it any more
clearly : Of
course it's not limited to SHARE attendees.
But you come right back and say that it is.
Of course the only people who know about it are SHARE people or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
[ snip ]
A key point that everyone seems to be missing is that SE's (and they
like) have essentially disappeared in the late 80's and early 90's.
There is no longer a way that IBM can reach out to
I haven't attended SHARE in 12 or more years. But somehow I found out
about Red Alerts. Thanks to IBM-MAIN and Cheryl Watson and spending
time reading IBM's web sites.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Ed Gould
I haven't attended SHARE in 12 or more years.
Gee Don, how's it look for Baltimore this summer?
Bob Shannon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
In a message dated 3/13/2006 2:38:58 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is no longer a way that IBM can reach out to inform the
community of good information.
Ever hear of the Internet?
Plenty of other businesses have discovered yet another way to reach
SMARTMVS was an IBM offering apparently available in Europe. From the
current SMP/E User's Guide:
The format of the HOLDDATA provided by the SMARTMVS service in Europe or
the Electronic HOLDDATA service in the U.S. is not compatible with z/OS
Enhanced HOLDDATA and does not take advantage of the
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:13:40 -0600, Joel C. Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what had me a bit confused. When I changed the storage
distribution to be only central with no expanded, the new config didn't
take affect until I did a DEACTIVATE, then an ACTIVATE on
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:55:52 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So at 03:00.00 you start a conventional backup process, and at
03:00.01 the same disaster occurs. Are you not in the same boat??
-jc-
Yes John ,but somehow no :-))
But as i said it was for the sake of the argument .
If you deactivate a CPC with active systems you should be receiving a
warning message identifying active systems by name along with a message
stating the action being performed is disruptive before you can proceed.
Operations types (actually most types) get into habits.
When Amdahl first came
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Johnny Luo wrote:
Another question.A little off-topic,but it's relevant to tso/ispf,
so I raise it here.
When I get the tso ready,I always use 'ispf' to invoke ISPF.
So I assume it a tso command,but strangely I can not find
this command in TSO Command Reference.But
Has anyone hacked Doron's $QNET command to work with the new NJE/TCP type lines
in addition to traditional CTC/BSC/SNA lines at HJE7720? Would someone be
interested on working on porting this to HJE7720 with me? Is Tom Wasik's JES2
z/OS 1.7 Migration Guide presentation (dated 01Mar2006) found
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
03/13/2006
at 11:44 PM, Johnny Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So,why Command Reference doesn't talk about this
command?
For the same reason that it doesn't talk about RACF and RMF commands;
it only talks about commands that are part of TSO/E. Look in the ISPF
Hi All;
I have an unusual request from my user. He wants to keep three months of
SYSLOG on the spool in one logically contiguous piece and every week, he
wants to dump the oldest week to a GDG, leaving the rest there in a single
spool dataset. It's rather like a logger scenario. I have never
Jon,
One shop I was at we dumped SYSLOG every night at midnight to a DASD GDG. Then
every week we used JOBTRAC (job scheduling product) to pickup the weeks work of
GDGs and wrote a weekly GDG to DASD. Then we used Jobtrac to pick up the
Weeklies and make a monthly tape.
You can do something
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Bathmaker
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SYSLOG purging . . .
Hi All;
I have an unusual request from my user. He wants to keep
three
What is the advantage of having the ShadowImage Flashcopy V2
Extension? Our mainframe has all its data on a HDS 9900V box. If I run
DFDSS Copy full with the dumpconditional keyword without the extension is
ShadowImage still being invoked on the box? Thank you.
- enD sin
Jon,
you could probably go and invent some wheel, a program to work with the
external writer program, to do what your user wants, plus some more to handle
the retention, tape migration, expiration, etc.
However, this wheel has already been invented many times over. Please look on
the Internet for
Ed Gould wrote:
A key point that everyone seems to be missing is that SE's (and they
like) have essentially disappeared in the late 80's and early 90's.
There is no longer a way that IBM can reach out to inform the
community of good information. IBM did it to themselves when they
got rid
On Mar 13, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
[ snip ]
A key point that everyone seems to be missing is that SE's (and they
like) have essentially disappeared in the late 80's and early 90's.
There is no
Jon,
on second thought ...
First of all, you can not keep a contiguous hunk of SYSLOG (one big file for 90
days) and then expect to be able to easily delete a day's or week's worth of
records. That's just not how the thing's designed.
Depending on your system setup, SYSLOG is automatically broken
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:19:53 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Last, if the group takes responsibility for software maintenance then
must do so (politically anyway) independently from any group
member.
And if the group takes responsibility for software
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:50:39 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Chase, John wrote:
Ever hear of the Internet?
John,
Yea and its a pretty big place isn't it?
Ed
But not endless:
http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
Thanks Brian. If it was only available in Europe, that would explain
why I never heard of it.
On the other topic about Red Alerts, I think I heard about that from
one of the IBM newsletters, that are easily subscribed to. I went to
sign up, and got the few that were sent out.
Eric
Thid poster had a REPLYTO, so it didn't make it to IBM-Main.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
-Original Message-
From: Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:21:16
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SYSLOG purging . . .
If
We were early users of XRC circa 1998. In our first few tests, we had
lingering problems because, with mirrored CFRM data set, the newly IPLed
systems could never get over the loss of the two CFs left back in the
smoking hole. They were convinced that some magic would bring the lost CFs
back
In a message dated 3/13/2006 4:33:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They can still be in the (composite) CFRM policy, but now they're simply
unreachable in DR just as the DR CFs are unreachable in production. No
more problem. Paolo is right.
Welcome back, you
SHARE in Seattle was very fine. ;-)
Thanks for asking about ESCON cards: the question motivated me to inquire
and actually make a plan. Cards are coming out this weekend; we need a POR
to force SAP reallocation. Stay tuned...
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
SHARE MVS
Jon,
I too have to respond on the droll side of life.
The SPOOL is meant as a temporary place to put print objects between
creation and offload (to either a printer, an external file, another JES
node, or the bit bucket). It is an enormous waste of DASD to keep SPOOL
there any longer than
I went to www.ibm.com entered red alerts on the search box, and the first
search result is a link to subscribing to Red Alerts (ok, 2 links, since the
article referenced an older page, but I was redirected).
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
R.S. wrote on 13/03/2006 11:12:15 PM:
I just added new member to SYSPROC library.
The command
TSO membername
does not work, I believe, because of IKJEXEC entry in COFVLF00.
I could recycle VLF, but...
Q: Does exist a method for refreshing command list without recycling VLF
?
Should I
On 3 Feb 2006 17:52:43 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Price) wrote:
Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/02/2006
at 08:13 AM, Edward E. Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Not for PDSE.
Dean,
I believe the product you are talking about is CA's new BrightStor Tape
Encryption product, which is currently in Beta and will go GA next month
(Osvaldo Ridner gave a presentation on it at Share last week as well).
This new product will allow any tape file to be encrypted and decrypted as
If a plane strikes ( forget the laser beam :-) ) one of my bay,i am OK,i
still have my site B with proper data because device end comes back only
once secondary is written .
If some human/application/whatever accident erases my data , i am dead .
For these reasons i need some DR backup , and
Does DFSMS have a new facility for dependent writes that
somehow chains the writes together? Is it as simple as doing
all the writes in a single channel program with a guarantee
that the perceived updates of the backing store are congruent
with the order of the I/O requests?
As I use the term
What is the advantage of having the ShadowImage Flashcopy V2
Extension? Our mainframe has all its data on a HDS 9900V box. If I
run DFDSS Copy full with the dumpconditional keyword without the
extension is ShadowImage still being invoked on the box?
Sorry, no. COPY with DUMPCONDITIONAL will
Ed
I actually agree with parts of your argument but as an outsider you lose a
lot of credibility with your constant negative ranting about SHARE. Was it
not you who told a poster to refrain from constantly reminding us of his
ex-wife? Perhaps you should heed your own advice and substitute
On Mar 13, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
A key point that everyone seems to be missing is that SE's (and
they like) have essentially disappeared in the late 80's and
early 90's.
There is no longer a way that IBM can reach out to inform the
community of good
On Mar 13, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
I went to www.ibm.com entered red alerts on the search box, and
the first
search result is a link to subscribing to Red Alerts (ok, 2 links,
since the
article referenced an older page, but I was redirected).
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
Hi,
I know by some way we can automatically/programmatically abend the test jobs
when there is a resource contention with any production jobs. Any idea on
how to accomplish this? I am a COBOL programmer; I have only limited
knowledge about the system programming or RACF or Job scheduler. So
In a message dated 3/13/2006 5:18:44 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and actually make a plan. Cards are coming out this weekend; we need a POR
to force SAP reallocation. Stay tuned...
Thanks for update...
We originally tried SFTP (SSH FTP) but ended up using FTPS (FTP TSL/SSL)
instead.
SSH FTP can only access files in a HFS/ZFS, no real mvs files, FTP
TSL/SSL can access all files no matter where they live. As 99.9% of
all the files we process are mvs files we found it made our life
In a message dated 3/13/2006 5:28:05 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as how to make the older data drop off, I'd have to refer you to
the excellent suggestions that have already been sent to the list by our
very sharp and clever posters.
Yeah don't know
On Mar 13, 2006, at 8:10 PM, James Smith wrote:
Ed
I actually agree with parts of your argument but as an outsider you
lose a
lot of credibility with your constant negative ranting about SHARE.
Was it
not you who told a poster to refrain from constantly reminding us
of his
ex-wife?
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:34 PM, Raja Easwaramoorthy wrote:
Hi,
I know by some way we can automatically/programmatically abend the
test jobs when there is a resource contention with any production
jobs. Any idea on how to accomplish this? I am a COBOL programmer;
I have only limited
Exactly what resources are they?
Raja Easwaramoorthy wrote:
Hi,
I know by some way we can automatically/programmatically abend the test
jobs when there is a resource contention with any production jobs. Any
idea on how to accomplish this? I am a COBOL programmer; I have only
limited
John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
We originally tried SFTP (SSH FTP) but ended up using FTPS (FTP TSL/SSL)
instead.
SSH FTP can only access files in a HFS/ZFS, no real mvs files, FTP
TSL/SSL can access all files no matter where they live. As 99.9% of
all the files we process are mvs files we
Jon,
JES2 or JES3?
How many syslog records does the site produce on an average week?
How many syslog records does the site produce in its busiest week?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
It's a Comm. Server (TCPIP) redbook. I don't remember the number, but
I'd expect you to find it if you searched redbooks for SSL FTP TN3270
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Rabara
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 8:44 PM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Joel. Yeah, I've taken additional precautions to help prevent
accidental outages.
One thing I'm not sure of -- Does deactivating a CPC actually turn the
processor off? Is there any way to recover or do we have to call IBM
to do a system restart?
Yup,
Raja,
You may need to check with your system programmer, but the parm member
called ALLOC may help. Though I am sure others might have a say in this
from the list.
In it is the following sub parameter:
SDSN_WAIT
Specifies the installation policy for batch jobs that must wait to enqueue
on
we're on CA-1 5.2 (SP04, i think); i've been harassed by the security team
as they want to implement external security (ACF2) to manage all CA-1
resources/access.
i've read all related sections in Systems Programmer Guide
- 1.6.3.12 (Options Checklist #37)
- 4.23 (TMMSEC)
- 6.x
but
Three months of SYSLOG sounds rather excessive, unless the user is
really willing to foot the bill for the extra JES SPOOL space, and the
additional cost of backing up all that data for DR. We only keep about
3 weeks of SYSLOG online to JES and just that much is typically 5 - 10%
of our total
92 matches
Mail list logo
