Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Thomas
I had one design in which the holes didn't show up when moving pads, and one that did. Very confusing until the penny dropped: Turn the "Drill Guide" layer on (Design/Options - tick the "Drill Guide" layer box). Viola! Holes show up when moving pads. Tom. > -Original Message- > From: Ab

Re: [PEDA] HELP!

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 02:53 PM 11/13/01 -0500, Sean James wrote: >OK, Abdul, I got the first part to work and created a *netlist* on the PCB. >Now how do I load that into the schematic and get the Ref Des to come out >correct and not erase the schematic. You can't just load it in. This would require more software i

Re: [PEDA] ERC (schematic) buglet

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 02:12 PM 11/13/01 -0800, Dwight wrote: >(1) I also open 2 revisions of the same design not infrequently, which >therefore have matching schematic sheet names, and would be horrified to >find Protel changing the one that I was NOT working on at the time! Note that if the old revision is read-on

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Brendon Slade
Wayne. Following Thomas' queries, try changing the colour of the pad holes and see (or not!) if this has an effect. Protel changes the colour of things that have focus or are selected, and we have no or not much control over this colour. As I mentioned in my previous email, I have the default b

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 12:47 PM 11/14/01 +1100, Thomas wrote: >Nope. I can still see a 0mm x 0mm pad with 1mm hole when moving it. Your eyesight must be very good! :-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Abdulrahman Lomax Easthampton, Massachusetts USA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message:

Re: [PEDA] Old v3.1 PCB Question

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 06:01 PM 11/13/01 -0500, Bagotronix Tech Support wrote: >Since a complex board has many >constraints, the router's choices are limited to alternatives it is capable >of deciding between. A wider open board presents the router with too many >alternatives, which it's limited judgement cannot dec

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Just to be a tiny bit more complete, under some display conditions and object can appear, and then when you edit or move it, it disappears. This happens when the layer that the object is on is not enable, but the object was made visible because of some operation that highlights primitives on o

Re: [PEDA] ERC (schematic) buglet

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:18 PM 11/13/01 -0800, Dwight wrote: >But if I rename the schematic sheets, I also have to update all links to >that sheet from higher levels in my hierarchy. Yuk! Since you are renaming them to include a revision number, there is a little tool called a "global edit." However, if one must

Re: [PEDA] Multi-Part Components

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 04:46 PM 11/13/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >And here I thought I knew all the tricks! I don't think that *anyone* knows them all [EMAIL PROTECTED] Abdulrahman Lomax Easthampton, Massachusetts USA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mai

Re: [PEDA] Multi-Part Components

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:06 PM 11/13/01 -0800, Dennis Saputelli wrote: >every time i tried that there was something it did that i didn't want to >do >too bad it's almost useful I had the opposite experience it has always worked for me. Hmmm. maybe reference designator positions were a little weird, but I am of

Re: [PEDA] Schematic Bug?

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
This has already been explained by Mr. Elson, but to say it perhaps another way: The message about the number of primitives to be "changed" tells you how many matches you got. It is a tad different in Schematic than in PCB. PCB does not include the object being edited in the match count, as I

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Wayne Trow
All these emails - getting confused ;-0 OK... Im running P99SE with SP6 my system is an NT4 SP6 Nvidia TNT Model64 White holes, Black background, not in transparent mode Yes I use a 0,0 pad with variously sized holes. OK that should replace three emails Ive previously sent Thanks Wayne

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Wayne Trow
Its a black bacground "Thomas"

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Wayne Trow
wrote: >I can't reproduce this, so a couple of questions for you: >1) What sort of video card are you using? Nvidia TNT2 Model64 >2) are you viewing the PCB in transparent mode? No >3) What colour do you have assigned to pad holes? White >4) Is the pad hole diameter smaller/same/larger

Re: [PEDA] keepoutlayer and planes ??

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 02:04 PM 11/13/01 -0600, Mark E Witherite wrote: >I've been monitoring this thread and would like to know isn't any one > worried about delamination of the PCB? I've had at lease 3 board houses > flag me about extending the copper all the way to the board edge. I suppose the board mate

Re: [PEDA] Multi-Part Components

2001-11-13 Thread Wayne Bickers
I didnt know about this, and this is great. Its amazing what you can learn just by 'listening' into these conversations. Thanks guys: Wayne Bickers > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2001 10:47 a.m. > To: Protel EDA Fo

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Brendon Slade
Yeah, I just tried it with my settings and I need a memory (brain, not PC) upgrade. I have changed my colour settings from the original (not the "classic"). My background is the default, however I have changed PadHoles and ViaHoles to black. The black changes to a purple-ish colour when moving

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Thomas
Nope. I can still see a 0mm x 0mm pad with 1mm hole when moving it. May be something to do with the colour settings. What version and service pack are you using? (me = S99E SP6). > -Original Message- > From: Brendon Slade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2001 12:

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Brendon Slade
Hi Wayne >From memory this only happens when the copper pad diameter is less than (incl zero) the hole diameter, irrespective of whether it's PTH or not. Cheers Brendon. - Original Message - From: "Wayne Trow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 200

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Thomas
Forgot something: 3) What colours do you have assigned to pad holes AND BACKGROUND? > > -Original Message- > > From: Wayne Trow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2001 11:48 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [PEDA] Holes > > > > > > Hi All > > > > We

Re: [PEDA] Old v3.1 PCB Question

2001-11-13 Thread Jon Elson
Ian Wilson wrote: > > They did offer Adv Route3. I bought it. It was not worth the price. The > router did a reasonable job on some boards and a shocker on others. It had > very poor copper sharing, so it would run a stringer from virtually every > SM to gnd and a separate pad even if they wer

Re: [PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Thomas
I can't reproduce this, so a couple of questions for you: 1) What sort of video card are you using? 2) are you viewing the PCB in transparent mode? 3) What colour do you have assigned to pad holes? 4) Is the pad hole diameter smaller/same/larger than the copper pad diameter? > -Original

[PEDA] Holes

2001-11-13 Thread Wayne Trow
Hi All We have mounting holes in our pcbs - amazingly enough :-) but when I left-click-hold to move a hole it disappears leaving only the crosshairs. WHY OH WHY OH WHY ? Thanks for you help Wayne Trow PCB Design Technician Gallagher Group LTD Hamilton New Zealand * * * * * * * * * * *

Re: [PEDA] Schematic Bug?

2001-11-13 Thread Jon Elson
Dwight wrote: > Jon, you're confusing PCB global edit with Schematic (what the thread is > about). Probably so. It all sort of blends into one another when I don't have it on the screen in front of me at the moment. But, other than the free/all listbox, I think everthing ELSE I said was mostly

Re: [PEDA] ERC (schematic) buglet

2001-11-13 Thread Dwight
But if I rename the schematic sheets, I also have to update all links to that sheet from higher levels in my hierarchy. Yuk! I just let the ddb filename carry the version number, so it's always clear from the window title which one I'm looking at. (Each ddb also includes a 'change log' where I

Re: [PEDA] Old v3.1 PCB Question

2001-11-13 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support
> They did offer Adv Route3. I bought it. It was not worth the price. The > router did a reasonable job on some boards and a shocker on others. It had > very poor copper sharing, so it would run a stringer from virtually every > SM to gnd and a separate pad even if they were right next to each

Re: [PEDA] ATS Specifications, Terms and Conditions

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 02:57 PM 11/13/01 -0500, Bagotronix Tech Support wrote: > > I think you all have far too much spare time on your hands!!! > >Actually, Stephen, I do right now. I have been recovering from surgery >since Oct. 15. Touche. I think I speak for all of us in wishing Mr. Baggett a speedy recovery a

Re: [PEDA] ATS Specifications, Terms and Conditions

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Most of this has become an example of reduction ad absurdem, but a few comments. At 02:10 PM 11/13/01 -0500, Bagotronix Tech Support wrote: >Abdul, you're a great dude, but I've got to disagree with you on this. >Maybe I wasn't clear enough with my illustrative examples. The fact that >cleanin

Re: [PEDA] Old v3.1 PCB Question

2001-11-13 Thread Michael Elliott
Thanks for the straightforward answer, Ian! I usually find that my manual routing gives me the results I'm seeking, while the autorouter that came with Protel v2 through v3 did amazingly odd things. You wrote, >You may find that some of >the very cheap PCB packages have better routers these d

Re: [PEDA] Multi-Part Components

2001-11-13 Thread Ian Wilson
On 01:06 PM 13/11/2001 -0800, Dennis Saputelli said: >every time i tried that there was something it did that i didn't want to >do >too bad it's almost useful > >Dennis Saputelli > > >Colin Weber wrote: > > > > Also, don't forget about Morphing (or Replication). Protel's best kept > secret. Denn

Re: [PEDA] Old v3.1 PCB Question

2001-11-13 Thread Ian Wilson
On 10:07 AM 13/11/2001 -0800, Michael Elliott said: >Hi all, ><..snip..> >However, I do have the occasional small low-speed digital board I need to >do and was wondering if Protel ever offered any kind of supplemental >shape-based or more advanced type of router for PCB3. I know that they did >for

Re: [PEDA] Schematic Bug?

2001-11-13 Thread Dwight
Jon, you're confusing PCB global edit with Schematic (what the thread is about). > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:27 PM > > There are a bunch of things that you need to do to get a global edit to > work on parts. One is that you need to

Re: [PEDA] ERC (schematic) buglet

2001-11-13 Thread Dwight
(1) I also open 2 revisions of the same design not infrequently, which therefore have matching schematic sheet names, and would be horrified to find Protel changing the one that I was NOT working on at the time! (2) Whenever a design goes to fab, I make a directory of all the relevant files & mar

Re: [PEDA] ERC (schematic) buglet

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 08:19 PM 11/13/01 +, Steve Wiseman wrote: >Abdul - the reason I'm running with multiple schematics of the same name >is that often I'll be working on a design when a customer calls with a >question about an older version, or I'll be working on a new revision of >an older design, while refer

Re: [PEDA] Multi-Part Components

2001-11-13 Thread HxEngr

Re: [PEDA] Old v3.1 PCB Question

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 10:07 AM 11/13/01 -0800, Michael Elliott wrote: >[...]was wondering if Protel ever offered any kind of supplemental >shape-based or more advanced type of router for PCB3. I know that they did >for 2.5 and 2.8, but can't find any mention of such in the online manuals >for PCB3. > >If they did, i

Re: [PEDA] Multi-Part Components

2001-11-13 Thread Dennis Saputelli
every time i tried that there was something it did that i didn't want to do too bad it's almost useful Dennis Saputelli Colin Weber wrote: > > Also, don't forget about Morphing (or Replication). Protel's best kept secret. > > The Schematic editor allows objects being placed to copy all the at

Re: [PEDA] Multi-Part Components

2001-11-13 Thread Colin Weber
Also, don't forget about Morphing (or Replication). Protel's best kept secret. The Schematic editor allows objects being placed to copy all the attributes of an existing object in the document. To copy using morphing involves holding an object (eg. resistor) currently floating on the cursor ove

Re: [PEDA] ERC (schematic) buglet

2001-11-13 Thread Dennis Saputelli
you might be making trouble for yourself by not using the ddb we have not (yet!) had a problem with it it also spews enoughs backups onto the drive outside of the ddb that i wouldn't worry too much about it Dennis Saputelli Steve Wiseman wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Ian Wilson wrote: > > >

Re: [PEDA] Schematic Bug?

2001-11-13 Thread Jon Elson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > I just recently changed over to SP6 running on Win2K professional. I tried > to global edit a schematic part using the selection as the common feature. > The customary screen saying I was about to change 16 parts OK? yet when I > clicked yes, nothing changed.

Re: [PEDA] ERC (schematic) buglet

2001-11-13 Thread Steve Wiseman
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Ian Wilson wrote: > I think it is a bug. Pure and simple. Yeah - I think so, too. At least, I'd like to see it fixed, in case a similar bug _is_ crapping elsewhere. If nothing else, it would make me more sure that some phantom loss-of-changes I've been seeing recently are

Re: [PEDA] ATS Specifications, Terms and Conditions

2001-11-13 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support
> I think you all have far too much spare time on your hands!!! Actually, Stephen, I do right now. I have been recovering from surgery since Oct. 15. For those who might be curious, I had a kidney tumor (renal cell carcinoma) on the left kidney. It (the tumor and the kidney) was removed withou

Re: [PEDA] DB-25 direct on a PC Board

2001-11-13 Thread Lloyd Johnson
>Amp make them. >Amp D25 Plug Part no. 747912-2 >Amp D25 Socket Part no. 747913-2 >Cheers, >Gareth de Mar. >Compucat Research Pty Ltd. Thanks so much Gareth. I had seen these in the Digi-Key catalong for a long time, but they were more expensive than standard types, so I never bought them as I

Re: [PEDA] HELP!

2001-11-13 Thread Sean James
OK, Abdul, I got the first part to work and created a *netlist* on the PCB. Now how do I load that into the schematic and get the Ref Des to come out correct and not erase the schematic. Sean James PCB Designer Telecast Fiber Systems, Inc. 102 Grove Street Worcester, MA 01605 (TEL) 508.754.4858 x

Re: [PEDA] Schematic Bug?

2001-11-13 Thread Stephen Smith
Also, I didn't explain why it doesn't work as you explained. I don't know programming wise why, but unless you actually tell protel exactly what you want to change (match attributes section), and what you want it to change to (copy attributes section), protel will tell you that it is going to chan

Re: [PEDA] ATS Specifications, Terms and Conditions

2001-11-13 Thread Stephen Smith
I think you all have far too much spare time on your hands!!! -Original Message- From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 November 2001 19:32 To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] ATS Specifications, Terms and Conditions > >Having your house cleaned is a serv

Re: [PEDA] ATS Specifications, Terms and Conditions

2001-11-13 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support
> >Having your house cleaned is a service. > > Yes. > > > Having your yard mowed is a > >service. > > Yes. > > > What these 2 examples DO NOT have in common with software is that > >they are consumable, and cannot build upon past work. > > Huh? Neither one is "a consumable," neither one is a t

Re: [PEDA] Schematic Bug?

2001-11-13 Thread Mark E Witherite

Re: [PEDA] keepoutlayer and planes ??

2001-11-13 Thread Mark E Witherite

Re: [PEDA] Schematic Bug?

2001-11-13 Thread Stephen Smith
I discovered this, but the global edit just takes a bit more tweaking. You have to enter what you want to change on the global menu. For example, if you selected 2 parts, and you wanted to change part type from 1K to 2K, open global menu, select "same" on selection under "attributed to match by" a

[PEDA] Schematic Bug?

2001-11-13 Thread lloyd . good
Hi all, I just recently changed over to SP6 running on Win2K professional. I tried to global edit a schematic part using the selection as the common feature. The customary screen saying I was about to change 16 parts OK? yet when I clicked yes, nothing changed. Has anyone else experienced this? Is

Re: [PEDA] ATS Specifications, Terms and Conditions

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:13 PM 11/12/01 -0500, Bagotronix Tech Support wrote: > > There is nothing intrinsically wrong with the "software as a service" > > concept. In fact, properly implemented, it could be an improvement over >the > > more common product concept. > >Having your house cleaned is a service. Yes. >

[PEDA] Old v3.1 PCB Question

2001-11-13 Thread Michael Elliott
Hi all, I'm new to the list. If this is a Frequently-Asked Question, or too off-topic to be appropriate, please advise and I'll take it to the Open Forum. I've been running v3.2.3 Advanced Schematic and Advanced PCB for a darn long time. While Protel has certainly advanced the product over the p

Re: [PEDA] vias vs. pads

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 09:23 AM 11/13/01 -0500, Sean James wrote: >Vias also don't have thermal reliefs like pads. (This works in PCAD, >though). It also works in Protel. Relief/Direct Connect is set for both pads and vias through Design/Rules/Manufacturing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Abdulrahman Lomax Easthampton, Massach

Re: [PEDA] HELP!

2001-11-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 09:21 AM 11/13/01 -0500, Sean James wrote: >Ian, this is a good suggestion, however, the PCB hasn't any named nets. He >just wires point to point, and keeps track of the wiring in his head by >using his rough schematic. I'll be more explicit. That is *not* a problem. Design/Netlist/Menu/Creat

Re: [PEDA] Multi-Part Components

2001-11-13 Thread Dennis Saputelli
i usually place the first part and then fill out all the fields and then use copy paste for the subsequent parts Dennis Saputelli Stephen Smith wrote: > > When a multi-part component is placed on the schematic, and you need to > set, or change the footprint; why do you have to change it for eac

Re: [PEDA] vias vs. pads

2001-11-13 Thread rlamoreaux
> Vias also don't have thermal reliefs like pads. (This works in PCAD, > though). That was an old version of Protel. Currently Vias get connected automagically to a power plane having the same net name using the connect style for that net. Rob * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Re: [PEDA] Antwort: vias vs. pads

2001-11-13 Thread ga
works also fine in Protel. G. Auge "Sean James"

Re: [PEDA] vias vs. pads

2001-11-13 Thread Sean James
Vias also don't have thermal reliefs like pads. (This works in PCAD, though). Sean James PCB Designer Telecast Fiber Systems, Inc. 102 Grove Street Worcester, MA 01605 (TEL) 508.754.4858 x33 (FAX) 413.541.6170 - Original Message - From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Protel

Re: [PEDA] HELP!

2001-11-13 Thread Sean James
Ian, this is a good suggestion, however, the PCB hasn't any named nets. He just wires point to point, and keeps track of the wiring in his head by using his rough schematic. Sean James PCB Designer Telecast Fiber Systems, Inc. 102 Grove Street Worcester, MA 01605 (TEL) 508.754.4858 x33 (FAX) 413.5

Re: [PEDA] Multi-Part Components

2001-11-13 Thread HxEngr

[PEDA] Multi-Part Components

2001-11-13 Thread Stephen Smith
When a multi-part component is placed on the schematic, and you need to set, or change the footprint; why do you have to change it for each part?? There might be an easy solution..but to me a seems stupid, as the component is not going to have two different footprints. I know you can do global

Re: [PEDA] McAfee and Protel 99SE

2001-11-13 Thread Coleman, Tim
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary="_=_NextPart_000_01C16C1E.A47E64D0"