nage.py urls.py
admin reports urls.pyc
autogen.sh reviews utils
confscmtoolswebapi
configure.acserver.sh
Ian
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.revi
g Mac OS X Server 10.6 on the new server, and SQLite seems to
have more built-in Python support than the other databases on that
platform. How would I do the dump/import? (Or at least where are the
relevant files?)
Ian
On Jul 19, 12:05 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> I woul
Oh, OK, I'll use the MySQL db option then, thanks! Presumably the
only database I need to transfer with mysqldump is the one named after
my Review Board site ("reviewboard" in my case)?
Ian
On Jul 20, 12:49 am, Christian Hammond wrote:
> SQLite should never really be use
id=%s)
Anonymous User Mask:
Anonymous User Password:
I'm able to log into Review Board with both my "short" name (iana) and
my "long" name (Ian Anderson), which are the same LDAP entry on the
Open Directory server. The only catch is that when I look at Site
Administration ->
If I do an "svn move" in my local copy and then post a review either
manually with diffs from "svn diff" or by using post-review, Review
Board is unable to view them. Is there some trick to make this work,
or is it a known limitation?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
ht
I think it worked!! Thanks so much!!!
Ian
On Jul 20, 2:05 am, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Yep, that should be the only thing.
>
> As for the actual site files, the only things you should need to transfer
> are anything in htdocs/media/uploaded/.
>
> Christian
>
> --
&g
face. But actually doing a search fails, I get a 500 error and
this message emailed to me. Any ideas? Is 2.9.3 too new of a version
of PyLucene?
Ian
ERROR:root:Exception thrown for user admin at
http://mailx.apple.com/codereviews/r/search/?q=test
Document>
Traceback (most recent call last):
F
PyLucene 2.4.1-2 looks to be the latest version before 2.9.x. I got
that installed and search is working great now; thanks!
Ian
On Jul 25, 6:20 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Yeah, the 2.9.x (which is a pre-release for 3.0) is incompatible. The
> previous series before that sho
Anyone have any ideas on this one? Would (|(uid=%s)(cn=%s)) do it
possibly? I would think that would just make it find users with
either attribute which it's already doing.
Ian
On Jul 24, 12:42 am, Ian wrote:
> I'm using LDAP authentication with these settings which point at
I tried that but it didn't work. I moved the pyc file aside and
restarted the web server but those didn't work either. I also tried (|
(uid=%s)(cn=%s)) but then I couldn't log in at all. Any other ideas?
=\
Ian
On Jul 29, 9:52 pm, Jan Koprowski wrote:
> Look
> here:htt
Hi guys,
I see a number of people have had this issue but none of their
resolutions have helped me so I post again.
I have installed everything on Windows following the instructions and
all I see when I browse the site is "Manual server updates required"
and underneath that "Install GNU patch.exe
thon26;C:\Python26\Scripts
>
> I wrote my entire install experience in my blog
> (http://blogs.pinet.ca/tim/2010/08/24/code-review-goodness-with-review...
> ).
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.c
Have insalled memcached and restarted apache afterward. It made no
difference.
Can anyone help? I really want to use this product for my whole team
but if the installation is this hard I will have to look at
alternatives.
Thanks
On Sep 20, 1:11 pm, Ian wrote:
> Thanks Tim.
>
> I have
OK, I feel dumb even asking this, but how can I tell if the highly
recommended python-memcached is working? For that matter, how can I
tell if I have memcached successfully installed? Should I see a
memcached process? Is that at all related to the Apache2
mod_mem_cache or mod_cache?
Ian
URL like "ssh://user@myserver..." instead of "ssh://myserver...".
If I do that then post-review can't find the repository. Is there a
special token I can set in the Mirror path like "ssh://
my.server.com/git/MyProject"? I couldn't seem to find
anything...
/Data/Sites/Default/codereviews/search_index
drwxr-xr-x 2 _www admin 68 Jan 20 01:04
/Library/Server/Web/Data/Sites/Default/codereviews/search_index
It’s an empty directory though. Anyone seen this one?
Ian
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org
They were installed as system packages I think? sudo easy_install put them
in /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
Ian
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:48:17 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> It's failing to access either django.conf.settings or reviewboard.settings
> (it
Yep, they were both installed in one shot; just "sudo easy_install
ReviewBoard". Installed cleanly as of yesterday. Review Board itself
seems to work just fine; posting reviews, making comments, etc.; it’s only
rb-site index that seems to have a problem.
Ian
On Sunday, January 20,
That is to say I started with a brand new server yesterday.
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:38:19 PM UTC-8, Ian wrote:
>
> Yep, they were both installed in one shot; just "sudo easy_install
> ReviewBoard". Installed cleanly as of yesterday. Review Board itself
> seems to w
Anything I can do about it or am I out of luck until 1.7.3?
Ian
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 8:44:52 AM UTC-8, christop...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Same problem on Fedora 18 / reviewboard 1.7.2
>
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/dona
Alright, thanks, I’ll keep an eye out for the next release!
Ian
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:21:56 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's your best bet for now. There's a pretty critical bug we're
> trying desperately to solve, and then we can get
Hey,
I originally installed Reviewboard using an egg to get a certain version to
migrate an existing Reviewboard server to our new one. Now we need to
upgrade the new servers Reviewboard version. I've tried using the
easy_install -U upgrade way. I've tried installing manually from a tar.gz
fil
for the ReviewBoard-1.6.15*.egg, after I install
version 1.7.19, it looks like the easy_install completely removes it. I'm
using 'find / -name ReviewBoard1.6.15' to search.
By the way I'm using python 2.6.6
On Friday, December 6, 2013 8:46:53 PM UTC-6, Christian Hammond wrote:
I'm trying to use Search with ReviewBoard 2.0.2. I simply checked "Enable
search" and left the "Search index directory" empty (which the docs say
lets it use the default). Then I did rb-site manage /path/to/my/site
rebuild_index which warned me and then said this.
Removing all documents from y
Skipping '' - no
index.
Skipping '' -
no index.
Skipping '' - no index.
Skipping '' - no index.
Skipping '' - no
index.
Skipping ''
- no index.
Skipping '' - no
index.
Indexing 0 review requests
Skipping '' - no
ind
no index.
Skipping '' - no index.
Skipping '' - no index.
Skipping '' - no index.
Skipping '' - no index.
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:09:50 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> What does rebuild_index with -v 3 show?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian H
Anyone have any ideas? =\
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:25:29 PM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
>
> $ sudo -u _www rb-site manage /Library/Server/Web/Data/WebApps/ReviewBoard
> rebuild_index -- -v 3
> WARNING: This will irreparably remove EVERYTHING from your search index in
> connection &#
= qs.prefetch_related(‘diffset_history__diffsets__files’)
> >>> print qs.count()
>
> This is what it’s running when it’s trying to index the review requests,
> but it’s claiming it’s finding 0 results. I want to sanity-check this.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Ch
should be extra_query.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
>
> On July 1, 2014 at 2:15:19 PM, Ian (iand...@mac.com ) wrote:
>
> I'm getting an er
Hmm. My instance doesn't need multiple levels of security, is there a way
other than using review groups? If we could somehow limit overall
authentication to a particular LDAP group then we could make all our
repositories public.
Ian
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:04:26 PM UTC-7, Chri
7;s some magic to be done
in the "LDAP Base DN"?
Ian
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You receive
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:39:04 AM UTC-7, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On 08/19/2014 03:52 AM, Ian wrote:
> > I really don't want my entire organization to be able to log into my
> > Review Board server, I only want to allow a few LDAP groups to connect.
> >
I did the easy_install -U thing to update Review Board, and then the
rb-side upgrade thing to upgrade my site. I get this output though, and
now I can't view anything in Review Board. Any workarounds much
appreciated!
$ sudo rb-site upgrade /Library/Server/Web/Data/WebApps/ReviewBoard
Passwo
Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
> Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
>
>
> On September 15, 2014 at 6:37:05 PM, Ian (iand...@mac.com )
> wrote:
> > I did the easy_install
I was running 2.0.6. I'll try to figure out the PostgreSQL equivalent to
drop the index and try again.
Ian
On Monday, September 15, 2014 6:44:48 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hmmm, it should have tried to drop the old index in that upgrade. Very
> odd.
>
> W
Phew, that worked, thanks!
Ian
On Monday, September 15, 2014 6:45:50 PM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
>
> I was running 2.0.6. I'll try to figure out the PostgreSQL equivalent to
> drop the index and try again.
>
> Ian
>
> On Monday, September 15, 2014 6:44:48 PM UTC-7, Christian
I'm unable to add a GitLab Enterprise Edition 6.6.2-ee repository to review
board. When I try I get the error message "A repository with this name was
not found on this group, or your user may not have access to it.". If I
log in with the same username then I can see the group and repository s
debug, but there is not any info regarding this
>> issue.
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 8:59:18 AM UTC+11, Ian wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm unable to add a GitLab Enterprise Edition 6.6.2-ee repository to
>>> review board. When I try I get the error m
t but none of them worked. This is the clone URL.
https://gitlab.sd.mycompany.com/my-group/myrepository.git
Ian
On Monday, November 17, 2014 3:57:42 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Can you provide a screenshot of the repository configuration, and the Git
> checkout path for t
I forgot to mention I tried the Service URL both with and without a
trailing slash. Where are the Review Board log files?
Ian
On Monday, November 17, 2014 4:30:55 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> That looks correct, except it will have to be "myreposito
I turned on logging and then tried to add the repository but it logged
nothing. Maybe I need to kick apache or something, I'll do that a little
later (since people are still using the server) and then see if I get any
better logging.
Ian
On Monday, November 17, 2014 4:41:20 PM
Yep, I can fully log in from a web browser on the server.
Ian
On Monday, November 17, 2014 6:18:29 PM UTC-8, MoonWalker wrote:
>
> this may sound kind of silly, but are you actually able to ping the GitLab
> Server from the RB server?
>
> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 11:47:46
We're on 2.0.11. I tried rebooting the server, but it still logs nothing
when I try to add the repository. Trying to get logging on the GitLab side.
Ian
On Monday, November 17, 2014 6:41:32 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> What version of Review Board are you using?
>
&
No go on that, apparently they don't have a very high log level on that
server. Would it help to do a Charles proxy from my Review Board server?
Or are there specific URLs that I can try to hit to verify what Review
Board is trying to access?
Ian
On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 11:55:
To close the loop on this, our GitLab server got upgraded to 7.2.2-ee and
now it's working!
Ian
On Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:33:18 PM UTC-8, Ian wrote:
>
> No go on that, apparently they don't have a very high log level on that
> server. Would it help to do a Charles p
Search doesn't want to work on my 2.0.15 installation. I did rebuild_index
which worked for the first time ever (all of our reviews belong to private
review groups). But when I actually try to search I get a 500 error and
then the server emails me this.
Traceback (most recent call last):
Fi
I'm searching for a ticket number, it's just a 9 digit number. Checked the
ownership, it's _www so that seems correct (that's the name of the apache
user on OS X).
Ian
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 7:14:45 PM UTC-7, MoonWalker wrote:
>
> make sure that you still h
roup Name: groupname
Repository Name: repositoryname
Ian
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You r
Yes, existing review requests against the repository are loading, I just
can't change the repository configuration.
Ian
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 11:30:51 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Do existing review requests against this repository still work?
Any idea on how I could fix this?
Ian
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-8, Ian wrote:
>
> Yes, existing review requests against the repository are loading, I just
> can't change the repository configuration.
>
> Ian
>
> On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 11
reason. Our GitLab
installation has been upgraded a few times too, it's GitLab Enterprise
Edition 7.14.3-ee 60aabef if that matters.
Ian
On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 1:53:02 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Can you verify that the username associated with those re
in a web browser?
Ian
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 12:00:54 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Sounds like that auth token may have also been removed. We don't really
> have a good way of resetting these for GitLab right now in Review Board.
> Th
How many repositories total? Probably way (way) more than 100. But I only
have about 10 configured in Review Board.
Ian
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 11:18:18 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> There's a few possible APIs that it may call, but I re
Oh sorry I thought you meant total repositories on the server. This user
only has access to 1 group and 6 repositories under that.
Ian
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 11:58:45 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Okay, this is likely the issue. The repositories can't be found
ot;archived":true
and doesn't show up in the GitLab UI.)
So I went back to Review Board and pasted the working private token into
the Hosting Account and saved that. But now when I try to save a
repository I get this error.
IV must be 16 bytes long
Ian
On Thursday, December 17, 2015
So close. That gave me a different token value from the original one, but
now I'm back to "A repository with this name was not found on this group,
or your user may not have access to it."
Ian
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 1:37:01 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
&g
...) Which is kind of weird because now it has
the URL wrong (or at least it's displaying it wrong in the Review Board
UI). It says git@:/MyProject.git when it's supposed to be
git@:/myproject.git. But everything seems to be working, so
I guess who am I to argue with success? So
ing Mac OS X Server
10.6 on the new server, and SQLite seems to have more built-in Python support
than the other databases on that platform. How would I do the dump/import?
(Or at least where are the relevant files?)
Ian
On Jul 19, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Ian,
levant lines to httpd.conf but it doesn't appear that ReviewBoard is
picking this up and carrying it through login.
Is this not yet support or have I missed something? If anyone else has
this working I'd be grateful to know what SSPI settings you have in
httpd.conf.
Many thanks :)
Python 2.6 setuptools-0.6c11
Python 2.6.6
Silk Subversion 1.6.12 (x64)
Memcached
WSGI Apache module
SSPI Authentication Apache module
Christian: Shout me if you want any beta testing of the installer
module :)
Regards, Ian.
On Jan 6, 8:34 pm, Andrew Leppke wrote:
> I'm trying to determine
#x27;: u'fail',
>>> u'err': {u'msg': u'There was an error fetching extended information for
>>> this repository.', u'code': 210}}
R, Ian.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/do
ticed them previously and can think all I have changed recently is
to add a trailing backslash to the repository URL.
Is there any debugging I can do further to find the issue?
Thanks, Ian.
On Jan 24, 6:34 pm, Jan Koprowski wrote:
> Any additional information what kind of repository You use?
>
Changed Date: 2011-01-25 16:34:26 + (Tue, 25 Jan 2011)
Cheers, Ian.
On Jan 26, 9:03 am, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> For Subversion repositories, we attempt to query the information on the
> remote server for UUID comparisons. It sounds like this is what's failin
We've just moved to GHE and would welcome better built-in support, so +1.
Happy to contribute if I can.
Cheers, Ian.
On Friday, 8 March 2013 19:42:30 UTC, Eric Schoonover wrote:
>
> I'm trying to figure out what the appropriate "Raw file URL mask" is for a
> G
Hi Christian,
Thanks, that would be excellent!
Certainly with (deserved) costs involved I would need to be able to justify
the advantage of ReviewBoard over build-in reviewing of GHE, but suspect
that won't be too hard.
Best wishes, Ian.
On Wednesday, 24 April 2013 10:09:31 UTC+1, Chri
Any news on this? I've submitted the form again in case it wasn't received
initially, but basically we are pretty desperate to get sight of this now.
Cheers, Ian.
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 06:51:53 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We've b
BTools-0.6-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/__init__.py",
line 422, in run_from_argv
exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
File
"/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.6-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py",
line 769, in main
submit_as=self.options.submit_as)
File
"/Libra
67 matches
Mail list logo
