On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
First, here is my conclusion based on the methodology and resoning below:
If certain conditions are present, one can reduce this to a mass-in, mass
out problem, and you
don't need to measure the volume of steam
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:20:48 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I was talking about running it above boiling, but way below the level needed
to boil it all. Different thing. And it's easy. The power can range within a
Jeff,
thermometer was calibrated and unlike common belief, boiling point was not
100 degrees, but 99.7°C ± 0.1.
So then you are relying on Rossi's calibration being accurate to
within +/- .5 C and believing Rossi who comes across as a fraud
(hiding the evidence down the drain, terrible
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:20:48 -0500:
Hi,
[snip
Rossi has not done a definitive test. I don't trust him on his input
mass flow rate (2 grams per second) or whether or not it was turned
to vapor or just spurted out as liquid slugs of water into the drain.
Levi has a lot to gain monetarily so I don't trust his high flow rate
test (where there
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi has not done a definitive test. I don't trust him on his input
mass flow rate (2 grams per second) . . .
You don't trust that he can read a digital weight scale?
not when
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Rossi's assertions of that steam quality can be measured with a
Relative Humidity meter (it can't).
Yes, it can.
No it can't, I wrote a detailed email on Vortex
it leaves the surface as a gaseous form but then it can condense into
microscopic droplets while giving up latent heat (heat of
vaporization)
what thermodynamic point was incorrect?
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Joshua
: Jeff Driscoll [mailto:hcarb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 10:37 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis of e-Cat test by E. Storms
it leaves the surface as a gaseous form but then it can condense into
microscopic droplets while
giving up latent heat (heat
Can someone tell me where the exit water themocouple was located? It
meausured a delta T of zero C to approx 9 C during the test.
Is there a photo?
Could it have been under the influence of an electic heater nearby?
Why didn't Rossi make a big tank of hot water? 120 MJ would heat 150
gallons
A fraudster (i.e. Rossi) could have yanked on that thermocouple just before
opening up the insulation wrapping making it fraudulently appear that the
thermocouple was close to the exit of the secondary cooling water when in
fact it was close to the hot steam input side of that brass manifold
Regarding ultra dense deuterium, George Miley and Leif Holmlid:
In Rydberg matter:
- the electrons and protons are inverted in terms of a metal (though
not clear what this means)
- the distance between nuclei in the planar Rydberg matter made from
deuterium is on the order of 150 picometers.
and I could try more variations if I had
funding. My website describes how I plan to do the experiment.
I’m including an email below that I plan to send to angel investors.
===
Jeff Driscoll
hcarb...@gmail.com
Boston, MA
http
possible you might find a sympathetic ear here, or perhaps
someone on the list could point you in an opportunistic direction.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m a long time
I should add that I noticed the streaming GUTCP book on BLP's What's new
web page - I'm not connected with BLP or anything. I find the theory
interesting because it is so elegant - no uncertaincy principle and no
playing dice with the Universe.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Jeff Driscoll
This email questions whether or not the sensor described in Rossi's setup
can measure the dryness of the steam and whether or not there was a double
check on the steam calorimetry by using the amount of cooling water along
with the change in temperature of the cooling water to calculate energy.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
How do we know that all the water ( 8.8 l) evaporated?
That's what the RH meter is for. (May have answered already.)
This is another example of the disastrous consequences of depending
As was mentioned by others, they should Insulate the black hose and drop it
into 30 gallons of room temperature water and measure the temperature rise
of the water.
How can you use an indoor air quality meter (listed in Jed's email) to
measure the dryness of the steam? (you can't)
How was the
at 8:38 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
How can you use an indoor air quality meter (listed in Jed's email) to
measure the dryness of the steam? (you can't)
Apparently you can. The person who did this is reportedly an expert in
steam
and cold
airflow in the room.
Peter
- Original Message -
*From:* Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:08 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Nagel: Check List for LENR Validation Experiments
That meter that was listed can measure
which should have been observed at the demo.
This is from an associate LENR researcher - Jeff Morriss, in response to
the other issues on steam/vapor raised by Jeff Driscoll and Peter van
Noorden, which so far do not have convincing answers.
Nagel states that 150 grams of water are boiled
at the demo.
This is from an associate LENR researcher - Jeff Morriss, in response to the
other issues on steam/vapor raised by Jeff Driscoll and Peter van Noorden,
which so far do not have convincing answers.
Jeff M. wrote:
Nagel states that 150 grams of water are boiled every 30 sec, or 5 cc/sec
So, reiterating what others are saying in reply to my email:
The HD37AB1347 device with the HP474AC probe is designed to measure air with
0% to 100% humidity. It is not designed to measure pure water vapor with
tiny liquid droplets (including zero liquid droplets) in it.
It isn't even close -
don't (or you may not want to) click on that tinyurl website from Horace's
email,
it might have trojans or virus,
(I'm not referring to his website in his signature, just the tinyurl one
regarding shoes)
when I clicked on it, my virus software said that a .exe file was
communicating with
Most likely there is some secret ingredient and / or method that Rossi uses
that we don't know. What are the chances that you will replicate it? How
about trying to reproduce Mills / BLP experiment ? The ingredients are
listed in his paper and Mills told me that it works every time. He steered
You can learn more about Randell Mills's (of Blacklight Power) theory
on my website - in particular I'm including some text from it as shown
below which can also be seen at this link:
http://zhydrogen.com/?page_id=350/#FineStrucPart2-rmenu
My goal from the website was to explain some of the
Mills says the hydrogen atom has 1 unit of angular momentum m*v*r at
all orbit states from n = 1/137.0599 to n = infiity
though around the spin axis, it has 1/2 unit of angular momentum,
with the other 1/2 unit of the angular momentum spread out on other
axis.
this is why the hydrogen atom is
he needs a gullible investor, or a fraudulent investor wanting to find
a bigger gullible investor,
he's probably learned the game with his previous fraudulent work
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I read through all of this - and still do not understand how
In anyone's opinion (especially Jed), and in order of convincingness
for an investor that wants to invest, which should be the most
convincing Rossi tests (include the date to reduce confusion)?
Also, are there any competent scientists who have *carefully* looked
at any Defkalion tests and put
I put together a Powerpoint presentation on Randell Mills theory and
Blacklight Power. Mills's theory involves fractional state hydrogen -
also known as hydrinos. There is a link to the presentation on the
home page of my website and also below:
home page:
http://zhydrogen.com
link to pdf
below is a partial transcript of Shelby Brewer speaking at some presentation:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/27312-commodore-applied-technologies-red-chip-conference-presentation-transcript
The technology side, we have a process called Solvated
I heard of one group that went to Defkalion with rich investors and
Defkalion either wouldn't or couldn't show a definitive test. This
group said that Defkalion had poor experiments, poor equipment and
dumb scientists running it.
Why not look more closely at Blacklight Power? They have top
initial results
in 4 months or less.
Jeff
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that an anonymous hearsay source or do you actually have a quotable
source?
2012/6/7 Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com
I heard of one group that went to Defkalion with rich
Here are my two cents from reading up on dielectrics:
With the 6000 V capacitor isolated from the electrolyte by the
plastic, the electrolyte acts as a dielectric which reduces the E
field in the electrolyte almost to zero in the middle but increases
the the capacitance of the capacitor.
If
after some thinking I realized I made a few wrong statements - see below
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:18 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I think the explanation offered by Jeff is pretty good. As long as a
significant electric field is within the cell conductive region charged ions
What are the best papers in cold fusion and what are the web links to them?
Preferably web links that won't change over long periods time. Base it on
the reputation of the researcher (even if that is subjective) and the
quality of the work. I've listed one below. Can people find others that
they
Does someone have the capability of doing a Differential Scanning
Calorimeter measurement on Sodium Hydride (NaH)? NaH can be bought
from chemical suppliers where it is sold as 60% weight NaH and 40%
weight mineral oil. The oil keeps air and water from contacting it
and chemically reacting with
Here is a paper that just came out regarding Balmer line broadening in
Hydrogen plasmas - written by Jonathan Phillips.
He describes Mills theory in this paper and shows data.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0810/0810.5280.pdf
The show Brink on the Science Discovery channel did a short 7 minute
**positive** piece on Cold Fusion at 10 pm Friday night (last night).
http://science.discovery.com/
here is the schedule of a repeat of the show
=
Sunday Mar 29, 5:00 am 30 min(s)
The show Brink on the Science Discovery channel did a short 6 minute
**positive** piece on Cold Fusion 2 weeks ago.
video here:
http://science.discovery.com/videos/brink-news-evidence-of-nuclear-fusion.html
http://science.discovery.com/
From Brink's website:
Everything
The show Brink on the Science Discovery channel did a short 6 minute
**positive** piece on Cold Fusion 2 weeks ago.
video here:
http://science.discovery.com/videos/brink-news-evidence-of-nuclear-fusion.html
http://science.discovery.com/
From Brink's website:
Everything
I'd like to reproduce Tadahiko Mizuno's experiment where he exposed
deuterium gas to a 0.8 Tesla magnetic field at liquid nitrogen temperatures
and got bursts of neutrons. No electrolysis or glow discharges were
involved just 3 things, 0.8 Tesla field, 77 K (liquid nitrogen), and
deuterium
Alan's website seems to have mistakes -
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v2.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density
Alan does calculations assuming that Rossi's 1 liter reactor (as described
by professor Levi) was filled with some type of chemical that could heat the
water.
(powdered aluminum and iron oxide) at 18.4
MJ/liter would last 19 minutes when producing 16 kW from 1 liter of
material.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan's website seems to have mistakes -
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v2.php
http
This link describes the difficulties of burning boron (forms molten layer
that shields the remaining boron from oxygen) and says that by adding some
percentage of magnesium the burning issues are better.
http://www.afsbirsttr.com/Library/Documents/Innovation-050610-MACHI-OSD05-T001.pdf
Also the
As far as I can see, they are still making mistakes by using a humidity
meter to test for the mass fraction of vapor to liquid water - also known as
steam quality
from their technical paper:
So they are again using a crappy temperature probe to figure out steam
quality (dry versus wet steam)?
This is so bogus.
If the boiling water has a back pressure of 0.6 psi, the temperature will be
raised by 1 degree C
see here:
http://www.broadleyjames.com/FAQ-text/102-faq.html
Is this the
Gaseous water vapor has 537 times more energy than liquid water droplets on
a gram for gram comparison (you wrote 20 times)
Jed, you wrote If he had used the RH meter used previously, the skeptics
would not have believed him any case, even though various experts has said
that meter is fine for
you wrote People who understand these meters tell me it is not a joke at
all. The meter with that probe is fine for that purpose. There would not be
much point to making an RH meter probe is intended for a range of
temperature up to 300°C that does not work with steam.
My guess (without digging
experts again regarding
this RH meter. I'm guessing they might not be so sure that the probe is
appropriate.
I'm absolutely certain that the RH probe is not giving *any* useful
information on the steam quality.
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff
Abd is right,
I've been trying to say multiple times that the meter measures
humidity of air up to 98% humidity. The probe can go to 150 C without
being broken but that does not mean that it can measure accurately up
to 150 C.
But that's for *air* anyway. We want to know the steam quality.
Okay, Krivit got a mail from Galantini:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/06/20/galantini-sends-e-mail-about-rossi-steam-measurements-today/
Galantini wrote:
Good morning, on the request made to me today, as I have repeatedly
confirmed to me that many people have requested in the past,
Yes, you're on the right track... see my posting at 6/21 at 9:04pm.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg48242.html
I would bet that Galantini is making an indirect measurement of the liquid
water content as explained in my posting.
-Mark
no, there is no way to make an
the
humidity.
I agree that this is not the most desirable method, but is valid, unless
you're claiming that they
are violating the conservation of mass.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Driscoll [mailto:hcarb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 9:37 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
The only way to guage whether the steam flow is adequate is at the outlet
of the chimney, NOT at the
end of a 10 foot hose that has condensation going on inside it. . . .
of water of vapor in AIR.
NOT in a mixture of vapor and microscopic water DROPLETS
Its ALGEBRA-I level math...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Driscoll [mailto:hcarb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:03 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat vs. Water
It would take a long time for water to evaporate out of any crevices,
so the liquid would stay around a long time, any probe measuring
steam quality has to do it from below 100 C and above 100 C.
but this is all moot.
Galantini used the wrong instrument.
I can't find the amount of grams per kg
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
More frustration than confidence! Jeff kept on insisting that there is no
documentation that the
instrument (actually sensor) can measure the liquid content of steam, to
which I AGREED, but I
requested twice that
Jaro has myopic tunnel vision (mixed metaphor?) with thoughts of a
warmer climate making more farmland or making cold areas more
hospitable to humans.
Below is a list of the disadvantages of global warming that I found on
a website. Any advantages from global warming are far outweighed by
these
Defkalion is moving to Canada. Can someone comment on something I
heard which is western Canada (such as Alberta and Vancouver) have
weak laws that make running scams and frauds easier?
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Rossi is right about one thing; the
This may not be a factor in the Celani replication experiment where
pressures are high (greater than 1 atmosphere correct??), but at low
pressures, the thermal conductivity of hydrogen gas is hugely impacted
by small amounts of a heavier molecule gas that is added - such as
Argon or nitrogen.
xvxv ZZzAssOc zz xxsex CT vacs cv Mv
Sent from my HTC smartphone on the Now Network from Sprint!
- Reply message -
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:What the heck is LENR+, anyway?
Date: Thu, Aug 22, 2013 11:10 pm
Wow, Jed Rothwell has
RPR then releases the hotter UV photon which can create another catalytic
hole (when slightly downshifted) especially in oxygen preferentially. A
limited chain reaction, mediated by UV photons, is the result.
In short, this hybridized version provides a more complete picture than
Mills,
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Jeff,
Looks like you have been imbibing on the BLP kool-aid...
comments interspersed below...
Do you glow-in-the-dark, yet? :-)
From: Jeff Driscoll
/9384649/story.html
Let's see- Mike Carrell remained BLP's faithful supporter.
Not LENR, but energy
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
/story.html
Let's see- Mike Carrell remained BLP's faithful supporter.
Not LENR, but energy
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
must consist of at
least 2 poles from which it emanates. This ensures that the field fall off
quickly with distance and that its total energy is well contained.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Driscoll jef...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Jan 17
by Medford Leas I.T.
Department.
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
this otherwise, it would be interesting to know. (I've already mentioned
spectrographic analysis as one possibility.)
Eric
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
no, won't refract, just gravitationally bend
here is a better link for dark matter:
http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2013/06/26/does-dark-matter-really-exist/
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:21 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Jeff Driscoll jef
.
This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
Department.
This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
Department.
--
Jeff
of a photon is a propagating
wave packet of interlocked magnetic and electrostatic fields.. It is
difficult; to picture such stuffed into an orbitsphere. I think language
fails to describe Nature here, but Mills’ intuition nay remain a useful
guide.
Mike Carrell
*From:* Jeff Driscoll
device itself (in its
interaction with retained protons) – but the conclusion is that this signal
is not derived from retained hydrinos being “reinflated.”
Jones
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
get
away with this kind of intellectual dishonesty. He is looking more and more
like a charlatan and this upcoming demo will be an insult.
Jones
*From:* Jeff Driscoll
As far as I know, Mills's theory does not predict a continuum radiation
having a cuttoff at a frequency
to track the position of the electron in time. That should be
adequate provided the position of the electron is truly a probability
function.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Driscoll jef...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Jan 20, 2014 10:49 am
Subject: Re
I tried to summarize a few reasons why I believe Randell Mills's theory of
the atom.
==
For decades, physicists have struggled with how to interpret the fine
structure constant, alpha = 1/137.035999
Physicist Richard Feynman said this decades ago: “It
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Jeff Driscoll jef...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to summarize a few reasons why I believe Randell Mills's theory
of the atom.
==
For decades, physicists have struggled with how to interpret the fine
structure constant
the calculation?
There are interesting implications if he does not need to.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Driscoll jef...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jan 21, 2014 2:17 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills's theory
you have 3 significant digits for 1/137.12 (i.e. 137
and look at the equations
in more detail.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Driscoll jef...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jan 21, 2014 3:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills's theory
yes, it is all in there, I can find it later, but if you look at his
papers
if there any serious issues with his math I would like to know, else
he deserves respect, with or without the hydrino.
/Stefan
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
, but
that cannot be a good analogy to this situation.
Can anyone produce an opinion to the contrary by a spectroscopy expert who
is not employed by BLP?
Jones
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
way, but am
speculating about some interesting characteristics that may be possible if
it has validity. Mark this post as blue sky wild speculation.
yep, wild :)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Driscoll jef...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jan 21, 2014
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:47 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Jeff Driscoll says:
|smaller fractions than 1/137.0359 are not possible because electron
would be going faster than light
|
Special Relativity explains the electron speed of light limit in a
somewhat reasonable
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
falls into that
category. Reminds me of the announcement by CERN of the neutrino speed
exceeding that of light which was retracted once a hardware problem was
resolved.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Driscoll jef...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Jan 26
you. Hence also the electron becoming a photon as
it approaches the lowest level.
Now we have to decide whether we can live with a series { 1/2, 1/3,
1/4, ..., 1/136, alpha(N) }. (Or something like that.)
Eric
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
, Nigel Dyer l...@thedyers.org.uk wrote:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/whats-new/
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
here are two links for MHD, magnetohydrodynamics
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/maspec.html#c5
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MHD_generator
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Jeff Driscoll jef...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't seen that picture but based on earlier stuff I've
/View/5789
Let me know what you think if you read it.
Lane
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
, the field
could change almost overnight from “pathological” to “cutting edge”…
*From:* Jeff Driscoll
take a look at Appendix 2 starting on page 62 of this, it is very similar
to what you did:
http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20150105175045/blacklightpower/images/3/33/BLP-e-long-1-5
.
- Jed
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
of the excess heat calculations must begin at a
baseline 6°C above ambient, because the pump is always left on. Therefore
this has absolutely no impact on the excess heat measurement.
- Jed
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
is the right curve we can discuss about it.
2015-01-12 22:58 GMT+01:00 Jeff Driscoll jef...@gmail.com:
Jed is correct, when the pump is turned on and everything reaches steady
state, (using his example) the pump is putting in 4 watts of power to the
tubing, the reservoir and the LENR chamber and all
.
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
Does anyone have access to electrostatics software package and have time to
do a finite element analysis on a 3-D part to determine the electrostatic
field potential? Specifically the JPEG in the link below shows a grouping
of protons and neutrons. I mainly need to figure out which protons have
ow do you think the results would be tested for validity?
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Jeff Driscoll <jef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have access to electrostatics software package and have time
>> to do a finite element analysis on a 3-D part to dete
16dP_SmSP8SuQbZ7p9eGoCwf1vwJKh7KPL7NAYv7j13o/edit
>
> Really nice insight by Alan.
>
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
Intravenous vitamin C and steroids (specifically Methylprednisolone)
works well on Covid-19. There is a bunch of highly respected doctors
(including pulmonologists) trying to get the word out without much luck.
The treatment has to be started as soon as breathing problems develop.
see here:
And the power of that incandescent spectrum could be anomalous and could be
from the creation of Mills' hydrinos. I wanted to investigate hydrogen
gas + calcium oxide "limelight" but ran out of time and money 2 years ago.
I got one data point from my calorimeter that didn't show any excess heat
If the 2.8328 fermi mentioned in the paper is multiplied by the inverse
of alpha, the fine structure constant (alpha =1/137.035999), then you
get the radius of Randell Mills' TSO (Transition State Orbitsphere)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624
the radius of
100 matches
Mail list logo
