I think that an API change is neccessary and that ist is just the right
point of time to do it. Most of the projects based on wicket are not
very old, therefore good enogh in mind of the developers to perform an
api change. Some of them (the new component constructor) can be handled
by an
On 8/25/06, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BUT: where can I get wicket 2.0? The official link to SVN on thesourceforge page points to http://svn.sourceforge.net/wicket. And e.g.in trunk, the project.xml file still has
1.2-SNAPSHOT as the curretnversion.Oh, you're right but that
Wicket 2.0 is in trunk. Might very well be that the project files are
not up-to-date though. Wicket 2.0 is easy to recognize as instead of
calling add on parents, you now pass the parent in the constructor of
components.
Eelco
On 8/24/06, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that an
just curious: why dont you do it like the eclipse-project and have
daily-snapshot jars ??? - and once a time a M-build ???
Regards
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Eelco Hillenius
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. August 2006 08:28
Just my 2 centavos, I can't think of any reason for Wicket to undergo m-build style of process. About the daily snapshot builds, I prefer the checkout-then-build approach, but you need maven and svn client to do this. But of course, the Wicket team is the authority to give answer to your question.
then it has to be automated. Because if it is constant a manual thing then it cost us to much work.But we could throw out a snapshot of 2.0 at this time. So that people can download it easier.johan
On 8/25/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just curious: why dont you do it like the
Started using Wicket and found a problem ;-)
To reproduce a bug:
1. Make a simple page with a form containing AutoCompleteTextField and
IndicatingAjaxSubmitButton.
2. In a page-class create a Form, add IndicatingAjaxSubmitButton and then
AutoCompleteTextField.
That's all, your
Thanks. Just like everything else in wicket it's really simple.
We could consider adding it as a default implementation. But then
someone would have to make an example too...
I can volunteer for that. I plan to use something like that so I could add
an example with J2EE declarative security.
Hi,
IIRC, this has already been fixed in the svn.
Janne
On 25.8.2006, at 13.30, Konstantin wrote:
Started using Wicket and found a problem ;-)
To reproduce a bug:
1. Make a simple page with a form containing AutoCompleteTextField and
IndicatingAjaxSubmitButton.
2. In a page-class
Hmm ... I downloaded latest 1.2.1 from Sourceforge.
I appreciate if you just test my sample against latest 1.2.1 in SVN.
Janne Hietamäki wrote:
Hi,
IIRC, this has already been fixed in the svn.
Janne
On 25.8.2006, at 13.30, Konstantin wrote:
--
View this message in
Hi,
I would like to jumpstart a portal solution for some monitoring app.
However, has anyone found a nice outer framework to take up all the
gritty portal stuff, much like Joomla in PHP, so I could use wicket
just for the real content I want to provide, or is that jsut lazyness
from my side and I
Both? :-) You could try doing a Wiki page seeing how much ends up
being code, vs code text?
If code then possibly as a part of wicket-examples (although the I
don't know if server-side requirements might rule that out) or a
standalone one as a project below wicket-stuff? For that, personally
you did check out from branches/WICKET_1_2, did you?
Martijn
On 8/25/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm ... I downloaded latest 1.2.1 from Sourceforge.
I appreciate if you just test my sample against latest 1.2.1 in SVN.
Janne Hietamäki wrote:
Hi,
IIRC, this has already
Are you building portlets? or are you building a CMS like system?
http://burgerweeshuis.sf.net is a CMS, but specific to pop venues,
probably not helping you.
Two students at Topicus are going to build an open source CMS using
Wicket, this fall as their graduation project. This will be similar
BTW, if you are interested, we could use ideas on the basis for the
CMS. Should we use drupal's database structure, joomla's, or build or
own? What is the minimal functionality for such a CMS? What do you
expect?
Martijn
On 8/25/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you building
Hi all,
I found this current post on Howard's blog. I quote it here:
Wicket has a nice community and a few nice ideas, but it does not compare to what I have planned for Tapestry 5. I believe Java is going to thrive at the high end and performance is going to be one of the differentiators from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I'd like to point out the Tapestry 5.0 will be something like the third
major rewrite of some form or another in a row.
Francis Amanfo wrote:
Hi all,
I found this current post on Howard's blog. I quote it here:
Wicket has a nice
Ah, then either you have to build from svn, or wait until we release
1.2.2, which will be around this weekend.
Martijn
On 8/25/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. I use packaged distribution (1.2.1) from Sourceforge.
I don't realy wanted to check out and build wicket from sources, so
But we could throw out a snapshot of 2.0 at this time
This would be a helpful Johan! I think this would be a good kick off for
Wicket 2.0.
Stefan
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:09:06 +0200
From: Johan Compagner [EMAIL
Then I'll try to build one this weekend. Just a snapshot, no magic/wonders :-)
Martijn
On 8/25/06, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But we could throw out a snapshot of 2.0 at this time
This would be a helpful Johan! I think this would be a good kick off for
Wicket 2.0.
Stefan
+1 for continuous integration publishing snapshot versions...On 8/25/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Then I'll try to build one this weekend. Just a snapshot, no magic/wonders :-)
MartijnOn 8/25/06, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But we could throw out a snapshot of 2.0 at
already happening...
http://maven.sateh.com/wicket/wicket/
On 8/25/06, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for continuous integration publishing snapshot versions...
On 8/25/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I'll try to build one this weekend. Just a snapshot, no
Hi I cant download wicket-1.2.1.zip at work as it gets blocked by Mimesweeper with the following error message:-
URL Classification .. Undetermined
Web Policy . Scenarios/HTTP Access
User Name .. experianuk\wilkinp
Proxy
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Hi,
COMET is not implemented as a core feature at this time.
Do you have a specific use case where you would like to use it for?
That might be a good start to investigate the options.
One use case would be, a application with a small group of users. The
users
Hi guys!
I've used quite a few different PHP based CMS', and really do find
Joomla to be the best laid out and designed (Drupal and Typo3 are a
close second and third). I've been toying around with the idea of
designing my own open source CMS using Wicket, Spring and Hibernate,
but really
well, you might want to take a look at alfresco,
an OS java CMS wich already uses Hibernate Spring...
so u perhaps see a start there http://www.alfresco.com/
Regards,
Korbinian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Hugh
Yes, Alfresco is a nice looking product, but it suffers from the same
problems that all other open source Java based CMS' do - minimal third
party development. Joomla, Drupal, Typp3, etc ... have so much third
party development support, it's incredible! Anytime I've used Joomla
for example, and
the latest in svn, like martijn said, lives in svnroot/branches/WICKET_1_2 -- not what you downloaded.we already hit this usecase and fixed it, like janne said. it would be nice if you could test it yourself, this is a community effort afterall. if you however dont want to test it yourself, then
It's understandable that he gives a strong opinion to a direct attack
on his framework. He's probably as ill informed about Wicket as we are
on Tapestry 5 though. So what she should do is take a look at what he
is doing and see whether we can learn something from it. Unlikely
though as it'll still
i might be totally missing something - but dont you need a special servlet container that maintains open socket separate from threads by using nio? like jetty 6? and then once you have that you need to use that servlet container's special api to do this?
with the current architecture if you have a
On 8/25/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i might be totally missing something - but dont you need a special servlet
container that maintains open socket separate from threads by using nio?
like jetty 6? and then once you have that you need to use that servlet
container's special api
WIKI page would be very welcome as Gwyn said. A basic example might go
in wicket-auth-roles-examples and this default implementation would go
in wicket-auth-roles. It would be great to have a patch for that. If
you have, please attach to an issue here
On 25.8.2006, at 19.43, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
with the current architecture if you have a hundred clients doing
comet you
will have a hundred threads - not so good.
Yeah. What do you think Lorin? Is there something we might have missed
from e.g. DWR? An alternative for your use case
igor.vaynberg wrote:
the latest in svn, like martijn said, lives in svnroot/branches/WICKET_1_2
-- not what you downloaded.
we already hit this usecase and fixed it, like janne said. it would be
nice
if you could test it yourself, this is a community effort afterall. if you
however
I'm taking my first crack at using some of the built-in Ajax stuff in Wicket
- pretty cool by the way!
I'm using the AutoCompleteTextField to filter some data and it works except
that I'm getting a javascript error. It doesn't seem to be inhibiting any
of the functionality but it looks bad,
This is also fixed in the svn.
Janne
On 25.8.2006, at 19.59, V. Jenks wrote:
I'm taking my first crack at using some of the built-in Ajax stuff
in Wicket
- pretty cool by the way!
I'm using the AutoCompleteTextField to filter some data and it
works except
that I'm getting a
Ok. I'm new to java development, so for now I'm not very familiar with
building libraries from sources :-). Well ... going to try. Sorry to bother
you. Just tried to inform you about bug.
You weren't bothering us at all. Thanks for reporting. The only way to
make this framework great is to
Excellent, thank you - I'll be sure to test 1.2.2 as soon as it is released.
Janne Hietamäki wrote:
This is also fixed in the svn.
Janne
On 25.8.2006, at 19.59, V. Jenks wrote:
I'm taking my first crack at using some of the built-in Ajax stuff
in Wicket
- pretty cool by
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
On 8/25/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i might be totally missing something - but dont you need a special servlet
container that maintains open socket separate from threads by using nio?
like jetty 6? and then once you have that you need to use
um...and there are recent snapshots available at http://maven.sateh.com/wicket/wicket/-IgorOn 8/25/06,
Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there isnt that much to do to get it builtinstall an svn clientinstall apache maven 2cd workspacesvn co
seems to me like howard was the one who started the flamewar by talking crap about wicket in his blog comment :)but honestly, who cares? different people like different things, lets just leave it at that.i really liked tapestry and used it professionally when it was in the
3.x, beginnings of 4.x
I like the idea of the AjaxPushBehavior mentioned in the issue tracker
posting. At one point I tried extending AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior, and
adding an addOnLoadModifier() which asynchrously called back on page load
and then I blocked that thread, with the intention of waking up that
Yeah, well at least he isnt trolling
your user list ;-) We used to have some douche bag from some other OS portal
project (forget the name) troll the Jetspeed user-list constantly. This
was back, oh, about 3-4 years ago. This person felt it was his duty to
respond to every user question
I have a POJO that is the object for my WebPage's Model (let's call it
SystemState). Some components need to interact with this object in a
non-trivial way in their onClick handlers. Other components use
PropertyModel models to get at a specific part of the SystemState.
My whole application
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
The problem that I had was that it seemed like all other
requests for that session were also blocked even ones that had nothing to do
with that behavior.
You would have to make sure the request for a push behavior is handled
by it's own
why didnt you just ban him off the list? seems like a rational thing to do :)-IgorOn 8/25/06, Scott T weaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, well at least he isn't trolling
your user list ;-) We used to have some douche bag from some other OS portal
project (forget the name) troll
Good question, I wasnt a list
moderator at the time. However, he did a pretty good job of making an ass
of himself so we just let him continue ;-)
-scott
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Igor Vaynberg
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:32
PM
To:
yeah, but that is only fun for so long :)-IgorOn 8/25/06, Scott T weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good question, I wasn't a list
moderator at the time. However, he did a pretty good job of making an ass
of himself so we just let him continue ;-)
-scott
From:
I remember a similar issue on the Velocity list a couple of years ago
where the author of Freemarker came around on every opportunity he
could find to bitch about Velocity. Pretty annoying.
Eelco
Yeah, well at least he isn't trolling your user list ;-) We used to have
some douche bag from
we're not tired of you yet :D
On 8/25/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, but that is only fun for so long :)
-Igor
On 8/25/06, Scott T weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good question, I wasn't a list moderator at the time. However, he did a
pretty good job of
On 25.8.2006, at 8.17, David Russell wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to build some Wicket based Portlets. The sample
portlet provided works great. Now I'm trying to convert the sample
TabbedPanel application found in wicket.example.compref into a
PortletApplication.
So far the tabbed
OH SCHNAP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martijn Dashorst
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:59 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Howard is bluffing here ...
we're not tired of you
On 8/25/06, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to do a automated way to do this, so components having
header contributions really work automagically, but that is a work in
progress and I'm going to do it next week.
This means that it won't be part of Wicket 1.2.2
Martijn
--
thats ok, im used to getting abuse from my fellow team mates :) it is the glue that binds us together-IgorOn 8/25/06, Scott T weaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:OH SCHNAP -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martijn Dashorst
Hi, I was wondering why Session.get() throws a WicketRuntimeException if the session does not exists, in my app I define an AuthorizationStrategy and I'm also using some spring interceptors where I get a user object that is saved in the session but I had to include a try/catch block in each case
It's really annoying when forums or mailing lists assault weblog
comments in a coordinated attack: don't do it! I mean, HLS is a
you-know-what, and that's been obvious for some time, but we don't want
the outside world to start looking at us like Mac users or anything. (I
say that as a Mac user
and if you are going to put down someones work at least leave your name!-IgorOn 8/25/06, Nathan Hamblen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:It's really annoying when forums or mailing lists assault weblog
comments in a coordinated attack: don't do it! I mean, HLS is ayou-know-what, and that's been obvious
Yeah, you're right. We shouldn't have discussions like this on the lists.
The kind of discussion that is appropriate here though is if people
find features/ tricks/ whatever that might make Wicket better.
Eelco
On 8/25/06, Nathan Hamblen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's really annoying when
I thought about that myself too. I'd be fine letting
RequestCycle.get(), Session.get() and Application.get() return null if
the thread local is not set. What do others think of this?
Eelco
On 8/25/06, Jaime De La Jara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I was wondering why Session.get() throws a
i think thats better then an npe, didnt even know we were doing that. so either this or add a session.exists() so you can test for it.-IgorOn 8/25/06,
Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought about that myself too. I'd be fine lettingRequestCycle.get(), Session.get() and
The origin of the problem was that I was calling super() in the
constructor and it happens that this made the pages bookmarkable. By
removing super(), it is now nearly working. Nearly only since with IE6,
the page get called twice, but I can afford that ! (I hope this problem,
as well as many
a very strange story if you ask me.super() is always called in the constructor of a java object. if you don't specify another super(xxx) or this(xxx) call.And it really shouldn't matter what browser you are in in.
because it shoudl be the same requests. So it looks like IE does an extra request?
we can change it, but i think we can only do that in 2.0 (maybe 1.3)because i can think of pieces of code that depend on it and don't test for null anymore because that can't happen...(i know i have such pieces of code..)
johanOn 8/25/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought about
Agreed.
Eelco
On 8/25/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we can change it, but i think we can only do that in 2.0 (maybe 1.3)
because i can think of pieces of code that depend on it and don't test for
null anymore because that can't happen...
(i know i have such pieces of code..)
I tried to reproduce the problem but I could not succeed (many things
have changed in the application). However, I could experienced the
erratic behaviour of IE6.
The page has a constructor with an int argument, and I added a counter
to see how many times the constructor is called :
static
I think Igor proposal, session.exists(), is correct and it could be added without any impact.Jaime.i think thats better then an npe, didnt even know we were doing that. so either this or add a session.exists() so you can test for it. -IgorOn 8/25/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I
Built all sources. It's still not working.
Bug-report:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1547028group_id=119783atid=684975
igor.vaynberg wrote:
um...and there are recent snapshots available at
http://maven.sateh.com/wicket/wicket/
-Igor
On 8/25/06, Igor
67 matches
Mail list logo
