CHUCK PROFITO wrote:
Tighten their antenna, or shield it
Hi Chuck "Profit"O
:)
You have a very envious name...
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Figured this may be of interest to some of us who are interested in isp
valuations, or at least the asking price.
George
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
An established, high-margin company has become available. The company enables hotels, apartment buildings and commercial buildings with
ding is fine if done right and by right I mean in
a fair non wasteful way.
George
David Sovereen wrote:
Since when do the people on this list support taxation, waste, and
government subsidies? Why should the burden of providing high-speed
Internet to people in underserved (typically rura
Thank you Matt Larsen for your hard work.
http://www.wispa.org/
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Matt Liotta wrote:
The last VoIP customer we turned up was a CLEC Peter referred us to.
Thanks Peter!
Go Matt and Peter R!
This is the way wispa is supposed to work. Networking with benefits.
Matt your in Georgia and where are you Peter?
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
0 Yagi's to use, but only have one in service.
Guess it will be interesting to see what we can do with these new cards.
George
cw wrote:
I have almost no clue. We've had little time to play with them and I
have no frame of reference. We've never used 900MHz before. The
throughput
Jeffrey Thomas wrote:
Wrong, airspan is shipping product
When are they shipping Jeff?
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
When you say limited success, can you give examples?
I'm about to buy some and would like to know what kinds of issues pop up.
Currently I'm using Trango 900 and RF Linx 900 UDC's and know the
limitations of those radios, wondering how they compare to SR9's
penetration wise
only thing I've seen with
5.5 is 802.11B. Which is why I am ass u m ing he is not being accurate
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Yep more WIMAX hype. He is using 802.11b. That is why he sees 5.5 megs.
And these are the people who sway public policy..
George
Brad Larson wrote:
There is no UL Wimax..maybe he is confused. Brad
-Original Message-
From: Dawn DiPietro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Here's the reply I got off list to my post:
In stock and shipping now:
http://www.wlanparts.com/product/SR9
Thank you
Frank Keeney
Pasadena Networks, LLC
Antennas, Cables and Equipment:
http://www.wlanparts.com
Hope this helps
George
chris cooper wrote:
I didn’t see any repli
Has anyone heard if they started shipping again?
I'm in the market.
Thanks
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
g of the coming competition and the quality of
which our links should be.
Anyways, if I insulted any of yeah, my apologies.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
pment
- Affordable Upfront Pricing
- Locally Owned & Operated
- We Also Service Most Rural Areas
===
- Original Message -
From: "George Rogato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:56 AM
Subject:
Oh yeah that AP is serving about 200 or more subs.
George
George Rogato wrote:
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
As a general rule you should not consider any customer if the cannot
achieve at least a 5.5 mbps connection.
Hey Lonnie, you should try war boards, speed is killer. here's my
are using them.
OregonFast SpeedTest
Your current bandwidth reading is:
15398.5 Kbps
which means you can download at 1924.81 KB/sec. from our servers.
;)
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Arch
ike I
said, it will be a different story when the competition shows up, which
is pretty darn soon if you don't have any at this time.
Build your network to it's highest performance and breath a little bit
of relief. Build it right the first time and get the most out of your
inves
land the sub and have a game plan like
putting in a 900MHz system or maybe a new micro pop repeater to re feed
him in the near future.
Hope this is helpful
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Is there anybody on this list operating a 6 gig link?
I'm wondering how the licensing works?
Can multiple operators run 6 gig in the same area?
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
I'm lookng for 2 and 3' out door nmale jumpers preferably smaller than
lmr400 for 2 gig and 5 gig
CAn't seem t find them on te EC or PW sites. Anyone got any other
suppliers?
Thanks
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wi
How are you guys handling your E911 requirement with your roll your own
voip service?
Mike Hammett are you doing this yet?
Thanks
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org
I would put a public on my laptop and see if it works elsewhere on my
network and work backwards from there. Not sure about your policy of
privates and publics, but it would be good to find out the reason.
George
Scott Reed wrote:
Yes, but none that we know would impact it.
The public IP is
Also are you blocking any ports?
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Had this happen with MSN messenger one time. We gave the customers pc a
public and the problem went away. Was a couple years ago.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
And they are spread spectrum, yuck. Just curious.
You don't like Spread Spectrum?
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/ma
Wonder how well OFDM performs in this situation?
George
Jason wrote:
Ryan,
I would think that the vertical beam width of the antenna you choose
would have something to do with it. Do a little trig and see if the
signal hits the rooftop or clears the edge; throw in some safety
factor
Wild Blue , good example. Wild Blue is a fringe broadband player.
Cable and DSL set the rules. They are the majority of the market.
The majority of the market does not charge by the bit, but the fringe does.
Guess thats proof enough.
George
Dylan Oliver wrote:
On 6/27/06, *George Rogato
n I'd
be thinking differently. But I don't think that type of operation will
stand up to competition these days. Times are changing.
We got to find a cheaper way to connect people faster.
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wire
Rick Smith wrote:
check THIS out. VOIP ATA / NAT router all in one.
http://www.grandstream.com/y-ht496.htm
Rick
How much these things running you?
I've been using the linksys ones but they are about 100.00 if I recall.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subs
I have about 100 subs using my free voip service as a beta project.
I realized early on that there was lots to do to bring my system up to
snuf to be able to offer a decent voip product.
George
Tom DeReggi wrote:
I think this would be a great sales pitch.
Currently send a Linksys ($60) out
are buying a $1,000.00 connection and reselling it for
a mark down.
Hence, "over subscription". How far can we "stretch" our networks and
what do we have to do to stretch it as far as we can.
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
Good points Larry.
I agree with your defining backbone and last mile rules and how there
should be 2 different sets of standards.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org
What frequency are they talking about. I read through the entire
document and didn't see the frequency.
George
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the cross post. I'm hoping that the FCC committee people will
see this sooner and work on it sooner/mor
It looks good to me
George
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Of for God's sake! Only one response and that's not even from a WISPA
member
Can I at least get a "looks good to me" response if you guys aren't
going to take the time to give me some feedba
http://www.zcom.com.tw/news001.htm
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Talk to Jamie S. I think he has a link up and running.
George
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Anyone know anything about these guys?
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq
Interesting that the city changed the contract after the fact.
George
Peter R. wrote:
MobilePro Ditches Muni Mesh Project
http://www.telecomweb.com/tnd/17055.html
Wireless data specialist MobilePro this morning walked away from its
contract to build a citywide Wi-Fi mesh in Sacramento, Calif
as far as adding the 2nd
antenna port with an external nfemale bulkhead and dropping in a local
"high quality" ap sector inside of the premises and getting away from
using cheapo consumerable wireless routers, the ones that disapoint our
customers and make us look bad.
George
--
increase the power under most circumstance.
George
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Remember, at 5.3 gig you are only allowed 1WATT eirp. That's 30 dB. If
you have a 24dB antenna the radio output has to be dropped down to 6dB.
But, that's part of why I love 5.3! Forces
a report of typical failure of co-ordination
and outline the steps that would have lead to a positive resolution.
Here's an example and they should learn from it.
George
Peter R. wrote:
Released: 06/08/2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION SEEKS PUBLIC
COMMENT ON CREATION OF A SP
I like it tight.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
I have to take that back. I'm not so sure they are already assembled and
ready to go.
They might fall under "some assembly required"
Maybe Lonnie can tell us.
George
George Rogato wrote:
Lonnie sells his war in a rootenna waiting to go.
Support is offered via the online forums
Lonnie sells his war in a rootenna waiting to go.
Support is offered via the online forums.
George
Matt Liotta wrote:
I understand you are suggesting I wouldn't have to psychically build the
devices, but that isn't what I am worried about. I want an off-the-shelf
product that is su
I'm using them as ap's. I have a link that is about 8 miles @ 5.3
George
N White wrote:
What kind of distance are you seeing with those 5G Rootennas? And what
kind of APs & Antennas are you using? Just curious - we're looking at
moving all new customers to 5Ghz.
-Nick
Those MTI's are nice looking product. Nice price too. Have you checked
out the pac wireless 5 gig rootennas yet?
They are working great for me and they are cheap.
George
Tom DeReggi wrote:
I was thinking
Although legal issues involved... (so not indorsing or recommending
this
to contribute.
I would just like to get more of us involved. The sooner the better.
Thanks
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
erent people with many
different ideas and personally, I want to hear them all, because that is
how we come to a consensus. I would hope that even if we disagree with
each other at times, we still respect each other regardless.
George
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
- Original Me
I don't think anyone is condoning anything Lonnie.
But I am trying to defuse the issue without pissing both of you off.
George
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
You miss the point George. I am not fighting. I called Johnny on his
actions and he immediately went personal and abusive. I rarely
Well now I don't feel so alone in my opinions :)
I still consider you a wisp, isn't that what brought us all here together?
George
Butch Evans wrote:
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, George Rogato wrote:
Most likely wispa will act on this. But, ultimately, it comes down to
does the membershi
At least you apologized Johnny, but it does get old watching people fight.
Can't you guys just agree to not get along and ignore each other?
George
JohnnyO wrote:
Lonnie - my experiences and my opinions of Canadian companies are that
of my own. Apparently you're looking to make an
I just want to know if the stole your girlfriend.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=prick
George
JohnnyO wrote:
Lonnie - my experiences and my opinions of Canadian companies are that
of my own. Apparently you're looking to make an ass out of both you and
I or else you wou
jobs and businesses that takes up most of
their time, so it's not like we have full time anybodies.
Sincerely
George
Butch Evans wrote:
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, George Rogato wrote:
1) Does the government have a right to know the actions of Americans
on the internet?
This is not really
rning this issue.
One is a social issue the other an industry wide issue.
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wisp
an enviorment for you guys to flourish.
I would probably faint if someone actually did this.
George
Butch Evans wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
Why aren't we fighting tooth and nail to stop this kinda stuff?
Why aren't YOU doing something about it?
Or, is this
thing accomplished.
My "poll" for a working group for muni wireless had 2 respondents.
Only 2 wisps are interested or think they need help with muni wireless?
Hard to believe.
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireles
I was assuming the same thing. I thought that European isps were already
required to do this.
George
Mac Dearman wrote:
I wouldn't imagine that this responsibility would fall on us WISPs, but to
our upstream providers like BellSouth...etc. Why would they want to deal
with the 20,000 piss
P-Chat with all that went
with it. This association is not created for the reds to lob mickeys at
the blues and visa versa or to impose their political beliefs on others.
It has to be a wisp centric discussion with a goal of impacting change
and benefit to our member wisps and the industry in gen
I don't know Mark, why don't you go do something about it.
George
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060601/ts_nm/security_internet_usa_dc
Why aren't we fighting tooth and nail to stop this kinda stuff?
Or, is this issue like certain others, where WISPA founder
I've been using 5 gig omni's from Pac Wireless for awhile now.
Fairly inexpensive I believe.
George
Paul Hendry wrote:
Ola,
I’m looking at deploying a small WDS mesh using only
Mikrotik in the mini-box enclosures. I want it to be 5.8GHz only to
avoid future interfer
I'm thinking it's legit myself, but we've seen phishing schenes soo many
times in the name of ebay.
I just had to check.
Thanks for your feedback David, and you too Bob.
George
David E. Smith wrote:
Bob Moldashel wrote:
It's a scam George
Looks legit from here. Note
16.0.40453> and User Agreement
> <http://click3.ebay.com/306460395.64016.0.40451> if you have any
questions.
>
> Copyright © 2006 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective
> owners.
> eBay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc.
> eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.
>
Thanks
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Thanks Jack,
Besides hanging in there, I tried very hard not to piss anyone off or
offend them.
Politics can get messy.
George
Jack Unger wrote:
George,
Congratulations on your ability and your willingness to hang in there!
jack
George Rogato wrote:
Rick Smith wrote:
We went and
a copy of the meeting where the city council and mayor
unanimously approved me building out on the water tanks and directed the
city manager to write up a lease.
To no avail.
I just couldn't get this one person to get with the program.
Finally I get everyone involved, it gets discussed at a city c
---
Pleas answer Yes( ) or No( )
--------
Thanks
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Thanks Mark.
Much appreciated.
George
Mark Nash wrote:
I agree.
Here's the thing. I put 1 or $1.00 in every numeric field so the #DIV/0
error didn't come up and freak people out.
The Infrastructure costs, if any, will appear immediately in the SECOND
month. Also, I have a she
sh
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
I'd take a copy Mark.
Thanks for the offer.
One of these days we ought to take some time to meet each other seeing
we're just "down the road"
--
George
they can stretch
their money by using their spare time.
Maybe in the very early days that might be true, but once a business
gets going, then they have to shift their frame of mind.
Being able to realize this early is a key to growth and success.
My opinion.
George
Travis Johnson wrote:
H
.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
To make it easier, maybe you can give what you believe to be an industry
price. I realize you can't give a price of Alvarion at this point. But
you can give us a hip shoot of what you think common pricing for ce and
ap are.
Thanks
George
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wisp
g out there for pricing.
Thanks
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
George Rogato wrote:
This was posted by Frank Muto to the isp-clec list and should be of
interest to many of the isps on this list.
Basicly it says that the tax on long distance was illegal to collect and
there is a refund due you.
George
Credit goes to Frank Muto
One thought that comes to
This was posted by Frank Muto to the isp-clec list and should be of
interest to many of the isps on this list.
Basicly it says that the tax on long distance was illegal to collect and
there is a refund due you.
George
Credit goes to Frank Muto
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
Ok, looks like the under a ddos attack.
George
Rick Harnish wrote:
Took forever but it finally loaded the webpage.
Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482 Office
260-307-4000 Cell
260-918-4340 VoIP
www.oibw.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
WISPA Wireless
Anyone else having a problem bringing up sorbs?
I just got one of those dreaded reject letters with a sorbs problem and
I'm having a hell of a time getting it to open.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wir
Thanks Patrick, I understood there was an issue there that needed to get
resolved.
George
Patrick Leary wrote:
That is part of the reconsideration process. The FCC (per multiple talks
with the folks that wrote the rule) did not intent to exclude WiMAX, 802.16,
or 802.11 products from use in
Will the 3650 be WIMAX'able. I understand that the 3650 is supposed to
be contention based and WIMAX is not contention based.
Any updates?
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pip
jeffrey thomas wrote:
sure.
Hi Jeff, so sure is your answer, and no is Patricks.
You got something different than Patrick that says a wisp can set up a
link and put it into production 24/7?
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org
.
Do you think this is a legit use for 3650?
George
Patrick Leary wrote:
Exactly, it clearly shows that an operator today CANNOT launch any
commercial services using 3650MHz.
- Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:40 AM
I thought someone said that Redline had a system out for testing?
Actualy I thought Bullit said he had some deployed.
Does Alvarion have a system that they are testing?
George
Patrick Leary wrote:
No one. The allocation is not yet finalized. Any licenses being granted are
24 month STAs
Who has FCC aproved 3650 equipment on the market, and is there any
balpark pricing?
Thanks
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060514/ap_on_hi_te/net_neutrality;_ylt=AnePk4SuhEyDtod39192oZojtBAF;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
Are you prepared?
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http
s who have experience and
talent in the area of promotion and marketing to help put in motion a
marketing campaign to promote WISPA and it's member wisps.
At this time the Marketing committee has just myself, George Rogato of
OregonFAST.net, and Tom DeReggi of Rapiddsl.net.
The committee will co
om DeReggi uses, telkonet.
George
JohnnyO wrote:
Do yourself a favor - Install 2 CB3s and bridge the 2 locations. I've
run into tons of headaches trying to use these devices. I'd doubt you'd
even need external antennas.
JohnnyO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
I don't believe the gas prices will come back down to below 2.00 any
time soon.
So we're shopping for new high gas mileage vehicles.
George
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Hi All,
Just got our $700 gas bill for last month. That's just MY driving. No
employees. A
JohnnyO wrote:
but we're selling an SLA to the oilfield companies that we
service with these systems. Our mark-up is approx 5x-7x what the monthly
service costs us but we'll have someone on-site within 6hours if
something goes south.
Good deal you got there Johnny.
George
--
WISP
Hey Johnny
Whats the speeds and latency up and down?
How much do you get to make on it?
Thanks
George
JohnnyO wrote:
We've installed 9 Wild Blue systems so far here in South Louisiana /
Mississippi / Alabama / Texas areas and have had great success with
them. WildBlue will be sendi
rom
radar and "other Wlans".
Anyone know more details on the current DFS and the regs.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
This is very sad. He was so young, 25. And he was not tied off as he
climbed.
George
George Rogato wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [Board] [Fwd: [Tower-pro] Tower Climber dies in PA]
Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 12:54:07 -0400
From: Bob Moldashel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re
Original Message
Subject: [Board] [Fwd: [Tower-pro] Tower Climber dies in PA]
Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 12:54:07 -0400
From: Bob Moldashel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: WISPA Board Members List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: WISPA Board Members List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, WISPA Chatter
<[
I'm doing 5MHz as well as 10MHz with Star-OS and Atheros.
I just ran a throughput test on a 10MHz 5 gig link and the test came
back 2000+/- KB
George
Charles Wu wrote:
You can do a 5 MHz channel size on an Atheros chip (Off the top of my head,
Alvarion & Airaya have implemented
some video's that I watch from home and I watch the bandwidth
usage as I'm watching it.
We are also involved in a video on demand venture.
Here is some of our video:
http://216.110.205.76/Florence/community.htm
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubsc
thier prices while the telco and cable ops
lower theirs? Not likely.
The burden has to be shared by the content providers. I'm not saying
make google pay per click, but movies and heavy consumption content
can't get a free ride.
So what should we do?
George
Peter R. wrote:
T
providers to pay,
instead of having to charge our customers more than our competitors.
George
John Thomas wrote:
It seems like it is time to bill by the packet.
Or at least by groups of packets as in 2 Gigs for $39.
Many clients don;t like this kind of billing, but it is likely the onl
ng this some, at least for the near future,
but if this scenario was to take place, what would you be saying then?
George
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
The flip side is that you are selling a customer a connection. That is
how YOU are making your money... why do you care what they run over it?
Does
I did just send an inquiy in for their new unlicensed wimax product due
out Q4 last year.
George
http://www.navini.com/pages/contact/moreinfo.asp
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http
, I think maybe Portland
Oregon and Seattle Washington have them.
And I think it was relatively expensive, Think I heard like 30-60k or
more per pop. Big wind loaded multiple panel antennas of size and
expensive omni's
George
Ron Wallace wrote:
George,
What do you know about them?
&g
Ron Wallace wrote:
To All,
Any one know anthing about Navini Networks and all their claims? sounds
too good to be true.
Ron Wallace
I think the techniques are great ideas, wish I could get some smart
antennas to work with an atheros card.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless
osed to be revolutionary
products using smart antennas and direction beam forming techniques to
overcome nlos and reach in deeper to the customer.
They get to use more power than a normal PtMP unlicensed system.
Vivato didn't make it: http://www.vivato.com/ VIVATO ANNOUNCES WIND DOWN
PLANS.
Ge
use a substantial amount of our network to deliver to both
our common customers their product without paying us a toll fee?
Anyone else want to argue this?
It's a good subject that we should be discussing.
George
Jack Unger wrote:
Net Neutrality to me means preventing the large backbone prov
buy them in qty to get the lower pricing.
The nice thing about the wars is ABG with 5,10,20 MHz channel spacing
all in the same unit.
As for Canopy or how many customers per sq mile, can't help you there.
George
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Guys;
I'm planning to use a Valemou
901 - 1000 of 1163 matches
Mail list logo