Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 1:31 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB and Cisco Switch port sync problems
Gino,
How are you - or maybe I ought to ask in what capacity will you use
these?
What OS Is installed or can you load your favorite flavor OS on them??
M
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB and Cisco Switch port sync problems
Hi Mac,
I'm interested in what you have to say about RB44s in x86 ..
Along somewhat similar lines, I've been looking at Migrus C787 mini-ITX
boards with 3-port GE expansion cards. I'm ass
, February 10, 2007 6:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB and Cisco Switch port sync problems
I just received one of these:
http://www.ipcdirect.net/servlet/Detail?no=84
For the price, It's a great value. 800 mhz processor , 256 ram.
Ill be doing some testing and r
.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dylan Oliver
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 1:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB and Cisco Switch port sync problems
Hi Mac,
I'm interested in what you have to say abou
Hi Mac,
I'm interested in what you have to say about RB44s in x86 ..
Along somewhat similar lines, I've been looking at Migrus C787 mini-ITX
boards with 3-port GE expansion cards. I'm assured that these are not 3-port
switch cards but that each of the 3 has its own MAC. I might put a couple in
o
: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB and Cisco Switch port sync problems
We are seeing a lot of issues with our Mikrotik routerboards (x86 based)
keeping sync with Cisco 2950 switches. We have tried hardcoding both ports
and letting them auto negotiate. Regardless, they eventually
We are seeing a lot of issues with our Mikrotik routerboards (x86 based)
keeping sync with Cisco 2950 switches. We have tried hardcoding both ports
and letting them auto negotiate. Regardless, they eventually seem to lose
sync. We haven’t seen this problems on the MTIK units, but only the MTIK
c
Recently, we decided to run VLANs off of one of the Mikrotik routers to
provide better port density. Basically routed vlans to a Cisco 2950 switch
(one VLAN per AP). To our disappointment, we found that this scenario
yielded packet loss even pinging between a hardwired radio and the Mikrotik.
We
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 January 2007 04:52
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik 1 to 1 NAT question
I have an office router/Mikrotik that has a wan IP that is set up as a
global nat to an inside private range. Additionally, we have a /27
routed
to the Mikrotik and are doing 1 to 1
Thank you very much Paul.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of paul hendry
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:15 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik 1 to 1 NAT question
You will need to add a srcnat rule for every dstnat
Don Annas wrote:
I have an office router/Mikrotik that has a wan IP that is set up as a
global nat to an inside private range. Additionally, we have a /27 routed
to the Mikrotik and are doing 1 to 1 nat translations using dstnat for
certain servers. Our problem is that while traffic can get to
You will need to add a srcnat rule for every dstnat rule you want to
work.
Cheers,
P.
Skyline Networks & Consultancy Ltd
www.skyline-networks.com
-Original Message-
From: Don Annas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 January 2007 04:52
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Mikr
I have an office router/Mikrotik that has a wan IP that is set up as a
global nat to an inside private range. Additionally, we have a /27 routed
to the Mikrotik and are doing 1 to 1 nat translations using dstnat for
certain servers. Our problem is that while traffic can get to these devices
using
I may be replacing my SonicWall 2040 with an MT for firewall functions.
I can easily port all of the rules I have created. But how do I get MT
to block things like Port Scans, Syn/Fin packets, etc.?
--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administratio
I've been seeing something strange in a pop I'm changing over from
Trango 900 to Tik and SR9.
The Trango AP reports the noise floor ( on all 4 channels ) to be
no worse than -88 (for vpol, that's awesome!) I can make a link
from 2 miles out with the trango, no problem. I remember surveying
I've been seeing something strange in a pop I'm changing over from
Trango 900 to Tik and SR9.
The Trango AP reports the noise floor ( on all 4 channels ) to be
no worse than -88 (for vpol, that's awesome!) I can make a link
from 2 miles out with the trango, no problem. I remember surveying
1-998-5599 fax
- Original Message -
From: "Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik/RB112/SR9
Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
Has anyone used the SR9's in a
;Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik/RB112/SR9
Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
Has anyone used the SR9's in a RB112? They are a little bigger so will
t
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik/RB112/SR9
> Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
> > Has anyone used the SR9's in a RB112? They are a little bigger so will
they
> > physically fit? How d
: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik/RB112/SR9
> Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
> > Has anyone used the SR9's in a RB112? They are a little bigger so will
they
> > physically fit? How do you like them?
> >
, and business's with a focus on TCP/IP networking,
security, and Mikrotik routers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash - Lists
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik/RB112/SR9
Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
Has anyone used the SR9's in a RB112? They are a little bigger so will they
physically fit? How do you like them?
We're using them and they seem to work ok. Having the right antenna is a
key too.
leon
Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Has anyone used the SR9's in a RB112? They are a little bigger so will they
physically fit? How do you like them?
Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Is there a Mikrotik guru who would be willing to assist me with a vlan
issue?
Please hit me offlist.
David
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
y the end portion first.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Nash - Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:27 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikroti
>From what I heard on the MT lists, they are not compatible (have differend
frequency ofsets).
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Nash - Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 7:27 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik AP/U
Can't get an association from the Tranzeo 900 MHz CPE to the Mikrotik RB532
with the SR9 card.
I can associate with the Tranzeo 900 MHz AP immediately.
The only thing that I see that could be causing the problem is the channel
table is off.
The Ubiquiti card has this:
922 MHz
917 MHz
912 MH
Anyone know if mikrotik does shared key for wep?
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Is someone willing to answer a quick mikrotik question for
me? It involves the license key. Hit me offlist if you can help
Thanks
Chris
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://list
Ola,
Anyone know anywhere that has stock of the RIC/522's from Mikrotik? Lead
times direct are 3 - 4 weeks at the mo but we need 20 ASAP to be shipped to
Cyprus.
Cheers,
P.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/40
https://secure.microplastics.com/metric_detail.asp?part=minilockpcbsupport&fam=cbhardware
I am going to order some of these and am looking for a few other who
want them too. They are the ones that fit the 1/8 inch hole for the MT
boards.
They are out of stock and it will be 4-6 weeks to manufa
I currently use the ISC DHCP server but want to switch to RouterOS. I use
the dhcpd.conf file to specify host names and DNS registration for clients.
Is there a way to access this file in the RouterOS system? Does RouterOS use
a similar file for DHCP and if so can I access it? Can I setup a scri
Anyone have a good guide on setting up Mikrotik for a hotspot? I seem to
have everything working except for Universal Client. Can someone gives some
pointers on getting this going. In versions previous to 2.9 there seemed to
be an easy setting, but I can't find anything in 2.9 that matches th
At 04:50 PM 6/15/2006, you wrote:
Any plans to open source it, so others can contribute? We have a
tool internally developed that seems very similar written in Java
We are making it as extensible as can be by supporting:
- importing MIBs (and MIB parser)
- customized probe adding
- custom tools
Any plans to open source it, so others can contribute? We have a tool
internally developed that seems very similar written in Java.
-Matt
John Tully wrote:
I just wanted to announce that the full release of the Dude 1.1
network monitor is now on the web at:
http://www.mikrotik.com/thedude.
I just wanted to announce that the full release of the Dude 1.1
network monitor is now on the web at:
http://www.mikrotik.com/thedude.php
This program is completely FREE of charge and is not proprietary to
MikroTik equipment. The version in development -- the Dude 2beta --
can import SNMP M
be more likely that
ISPs can justify using two polarities per sector.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "John Tully" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, June 08,
At 02:36 AM 6/8/2006, you wrote:
MessageA few months ago, someone said this can be done, but for the
life of me, I can't figure it out.
Mikrotik channels are not aligned with Trango channels, and I want
to slide/change my Mikrotik channel center points by 10 mhz so it
matches my Trangos at th
Title: Message
A few months ago, someone said this can be done,
but for the life of me, I can't figure it out.
Mikrotik channels are not aligned with Trango
channels, and I want to slide/change my Mikrotik channel center points by 10 mhz
so it matches my Trangos at the cell.
For example,
en't tried this, so it may
not have the desired affect of letting you see retransmit levels, but it's
an idea.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 3:41
eless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Virtual AP
Following up to my own post...
Short of removing the RF interference (relocate CPE, cut down a branch, a
tree, etc), about all you can do is increase the gain of the client's
antenna. As an alternative to looking at the jitter and packet loss
al Message -
From: "David Sovereen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Virtual AP
> There isn't much you can do; we're not given controls over settings at
that
> low layer.
>
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik Virtual AP
Thought as much but was hoping it might have been an issue further up the
stack. Anyone know if
Sovereen
Sent: 03 June 2006 14:46
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Virtual AP
Hi Paul,
It's an RF problem. 802.11a/b/g and Nstreme all have packet acknowledgement
in the protocol. Every packet your AP sends needs to be acknowledged by the
client. When a packet i
TECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Virtual AP
Ola,
I currently have a scenario where a dozen clients are connected
to a 5.8GHz AP where one is a NLOS link. The link quality is fine for this
c
Ola,
I currently have a scenario
where a dozen clients are connected to a 5.8GHz AP where one is a NLOS link.
The link quality is fine for this client during normal conditions but when it
rains it becomes a little unstable which the customer is fine with as they have
no alte
I'm curious about this also..
Jon Langeler wrote:
We're setting up MT PPPoE w/ Radius and while we're at it maybe
hotspot auth. Recommended packaged solutions? Anyone tried Radius
Manager 2.0.2 before? Anyone want to provide some consulting on this
that's done it before? :-)
Thanks
Jon
We're setting up MT PPPoE w/ Radius and while we're at it maybe hotspot
auth. Recommended packaged solutions? Anyone tried Radius Manager 2.0.2
before? Anyone want to provide some consulting on this that's done it
before? :-)
Thanks
Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
WISPA Wirele
Ola,
Has anyone tried running Mikrotik on a Via CoreFussion based SBC
yet? I know people have had issues with Via boards in the past but I was
hoping all the bugs are ironed out now. There is one board that I'm thinking
of trying which has the Luke 533MHz, 256M onboard memory, CF slot, dua
ent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:41 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik MUM - whose going?
That explains
everything? :-D
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
office 905 349-2084
Emergency only Pager 905 377-6900
skype cajeptha
Original Message-From:
Carl A Jeptha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, March 01,
2006 9:41 PMTo: WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA]
Mikrotik MUM - whose going?
That explains
everything? :-D
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
office 905 349-
318.303.4229
-
Original Message -
From:
JohnnyO
To:
WISPA
General List
Sent:
Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:51 PM
Subject:
Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik MUM - whose going?
oh jeez - there goes the neighborhood - Someone call ahead to the Texas
Rangers
why? are you coming
:-)
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
office 905 349-2084
Emergency only Pager 905 377-6900
skype cajeptha
JohnnyO wrote:
oh jeez - there goes the neighborhood - Someone call ahead to the Texas
Rangers to let them k
-tel.uswww.RadioResponse.org (Katrina
Relief)Rayville, La.318.728.8600 318.303.4227318.303.4229
- Original Message -
From:
JohnnyO
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:51
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik MUM - whose
going?
oh jeez - there goes the
oh jeez - there goes the neighborhood - Someone call ahead to the Texas Rangers to let them know !
JohnnyO
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 12:04 -0500, Carl A Jeptha wrote:
If none of your other deserving Katrina assistants wants one I'll take one.
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://ww
If none of your other deserving Katrina assistants wants one I'll take one.
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
office 905 349-2084
Emergency only Pager 905 377-6900
skype cajeptha
Mac Dearman wrote:
Mikrotik is holding their first ever U.S. MUM (MikroTik Users
Meeti
Mikrotik is holding their first ever U.S. MUM (MikroTik Users Meeting) in
Dallas, TX, May 4-5th, 2006. There will also be a training class scheduled
for the three days prior to MUM.
I have a few free passes due to Katrina work - - any takers?
More info here:
http://mum.mikrotik.com/
Mac
I see MikroTik has their MUM (MikroTik Users Meeting) scheduled for Dallas,
Texas May 4-5th as well as a
3 day training before that - - anyone here going to attend other than me? I
aint bashful and would share a room
with someone :-) if they dont snore as loud as myself or BUTCH EVANS
M
r.com 787.273.4143 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of robert maierSent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:57 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - Longest 2.4ghz Shot Working for another company at the time I thought we
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of robert maier
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006
12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik -
Longest 2.4ghz Shot
Working for another company at the time I thought we were hot when we
got a 32 mile link going using cm9 802.11
Working for another company at the time I thought we were hot when we got a 32 mile link going using cm9 802.11 karlnet software stuff this was out in Nebraska going from one center silo to two end silos all PTP, then came the 50+ link down in the caribbean still works great to this day goes from
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:24:25 -0600
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik - Longest 2.4ghz Shot
>
What is the longest 2.4ghz shot using Mikrotik and SR2s or CM9s does anyone have
working ? Curious
>
>
JohnnyO
--- End of O
What is the longest 2.4ghz shot using Mikrotik and SR2s or CM9s does anyone have working ? Curious
JohnnyO
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
nd make
sure we use the optimal port.
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL & Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Blair Davis
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:49
AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz
Radio c
less, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
-
Original Message -
From:
Blair
Davis
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
'WISPA
General List'
Sent:
Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:04 PM
Subject:
Re: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz Radio cards and
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Blair Davis
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:04
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz
Radio cards and settings.
I was/am aware of the mmcx issue and all tests were done wi
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006
5:31 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MikroTik
5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
If it help, we got SR5’s as soon as they
where available. When I put them in a real world environment on a StarO
: Thursday, February 09, 2006
5:31 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MikroTik
5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
If it help, we got SR5’s as soon as they where
available. When I put them in a real world environment on a StarOS/WRAP set-up
I saw no increase in signal
Behalf
Of Blair Davis
Sent: 09 February 2006 20:10
To: Scott Reed
Cc: WISPA
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MikroTik
5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
That makes sense as an explanation for the CM9
issue. Thanks...
Doesn't explain the low output on the SR5 cards
Scott Reed
r
NewWays
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
www.nwwnet.net
-- Original Message ---
From: Blair Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:07:46 -0500
Subject: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz Radio ca
Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:07:46 -0500
Subject: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
> Hey all:
>
>
I'm getting some odd results here with a PtP 5.8GHz link using MikroTik
>
that I setup to tes
s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:07 PM
Subject: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
Hey all:
I'm getting some odd results here with a PtP 5.8GHz link using
MikroTik that I setup to test with. Let me des
ebruary 09, 2006 2:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
Hey all:
I'm getting some odd results here with a PtP 5.8GHz link using MikroTik
that I setup to test with. Let me describe the setup...
The link is 7.9 miles with clear LoS and clear Fre
Upgrade to 2.9.12. It has better wireless performance. Chech the mikrotik
forums.
- Original Message -
From: "Blair Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:07 PM
Subject: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz Radio card
What pigtails and connectors? Mmcx on the SR5 or u.fl? are these new SR5's or
older sr'5s?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Blair Davis
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 2:08 PM
> To: WISPA General List
&g
Hey all:
I'm getting some odd results here with a PtP 5.8GHz link using MikroTik
that I setup to test with. Let me describe the setup...
The link is 7.9 miles with clear LoS and clear Frenel zone. Each end
has a 27db grid with a 3ft LMR-400 jumper to the MikroTik radio.
Using the link cal
of options on the table for the WISP's
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Tom DeReggi
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:29 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Bridging w-Nstreme
>
: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Bridging w-Nstreme
Thought I'd share my test results on NStreme.
I am happy with John Tulley's (Mikrotik's) attitude, in the sense that they
are constantly trying to improve their product, and listening to comments
from users of the
"WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Bridging w-Nstreme
Thats exactly what we are trying to do, but its not working, using version
9.12.
If I try ping radios
When sniffing, the station sees traffic comming in, but the AP-brid
Thought I'd share my test results on NStreme.
I am happy with John Tulley's (Mikrotik's) attitude, in the sense that they
are constantly trying to improve their product, and listening to comments
from users of their product, and attempting to make sure users are not
misinformed about the featu
Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "JNA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 12:32 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik Bridging w-Nstreme
However, it appears their may be is a flaw in config op
usOS seems
to properly support these cards.
/ Eje
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of JNA
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 23:37
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 5 & 10 Mhz
>
I just installed the new 2.9.12 packages and noticed an issue with the
ability to use the 5 and 10 mhz option. I have two sets of cards in the
machines:
(Atheros AR5212) & (Atheros AR5213) - The AR5213 shows the options to use 5
& 10 mhz however my AR5212 cards do not have this option? Is there a
> However, it appears their may be is a flaw in config options, in the sense
> that there is no way to get NStreme to work in PTMP modes as a True
> bridge,
> as that would require WDS-AP and WDS-Slave which is not a supported
> config.
> Am I correct on this? Or when NStreme is used, can I safely
When using Mikrotik, if I want to do a true bridging configuration (like an
ehternet Switch), if I set AP mode on one side and Client mode on the other,
it does not work because default 802.11 clients do not support bridging. To
solve this, without using Nstreme, we used WDS mode. One side set
Ola,
Looking to deploy 2 Mikrotik
routers to connect 2 offices using EoIP and would also like to use the routers
as VoIP to PSTN gateways. Does anyone have advice on what are the best cards to
use with Mikrotik for FXS (to connect telephones and faxes) and FXO (to connect
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Quick questions 2
Also
We were unable to bridge a Wifi card to the Ethernet port when in Station
mode, and successfully pass traffic. In Mikrotik documentation, it clearly
states that this is NOT supported because of a limitation of WiFi. I
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Quick questions 2
Also
We were unable to bridge a Wifi card to the Ethernet port when in Station mode,
and successfully pass traffic. In Mikrotik documentation, it clearly states
that this is NOT supported because of a limitation of WiFi. I find it hard to
Tom DeReggi wrote:
> I have Station Server boxes, configured as Stations, and have them set as
> bridges with no problem. Am I missing something? Am I correct that
> Mikrotiks can't be set up as bridges between Ethernet and Wifi port? For
> various reasons I do NOT want to route.
This is a gues
om DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:46 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Quick questions
I'm usi
I'm using Mikrotik live for the first time tommorrow and in a crunch for an
8am install.
1> We flashed Mikrotik to WRAP boards. However, it will not shut down, and
their for prevents soft reboot. This is a known issue with WRAP boards
listed in their docs, and can be fixed with a kernal bit
Has anyone tested Mikrotik's VLAN support over the Wireless ports (Atheros)
for large packet support (1500 bytes + additional bytes for VLAN )?
I know that you can't layer VLAN on top of two pre-existed bridged ports,
its a limitation of Linux. But you can bridge a VLAN interface/port to
anoth
901 - 992 of 992 matches
Mail list logo
