Finally something reasonable.
And, having side by side channels makes it easier to use the additional space -
which is what is really needed.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Mar 22, 2018, at 15:19, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Re: [wsjt-devel
more effective (than color) for
distinction in HI (human interface) display.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Apr 25, 2018, at 23:33, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:27:37 +1200
> From: mailto:g...@isect.com>>
>
kind of radio
command thing going from “fake it” split mode to “none” when doing the
configuration change?
Otherwise, v1.4rc worked fine.
BTW, in “fake it” split mode, my radio says it switches +500kc on tx. Is this
normal? Normally, I use “none” so had not noticed this before.
Al Pawlowski
Thanks Mike. Manual not real clear about what “fake it” actually does. I assume
the tx shifting is coordinated to match the 1000Hz mark in Fox/Hound mode. Or,
is “fake it” not appropriate for that mode? Did not get to a Fox anytime during
today’s test to see.
> On May 5, 2018, at 13:08, wsjt-d
adio to SAT mode!.
gl de ha6nn
Andras
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 6:21 AM, Claude Frantz
wrote:
On 05/05/2018 10:27 PM, Al Pawlowski wrote:
Hi Al & All,
Manual not real clear about what ?fake it? actually does.
If my observation is right, the real split mode is using the se
loop at 10ft.
For those of us with tunable tx filters, it might even be useful if WSJT-x had
a user adjustable split offset. Be interesting to see how narrow one could
really go.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 7, 2018, at 01:29, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wr
Be nice if the Rx<—Tx (now does Rx to Tx) and Tx<—Rx (now does Tx to Rx)
buttons were corrected to match their functions.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one
Interesting. My top button (of the two) is Tx<--Rx and moves the Tx
(upper red marker) to the Rx (lower green marker) when I click it - vice
versa on the lower button Rx<--Tx.
Does this both on v1.9rc, the previous rc releases and v1.8. I do not
remember whether it was the same on earlier vers
Saku)
enough said.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 7, 2018, at 20:12, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Re: [wsjt-devel] v1.9 Release Readability
--
Check out the vibrant tech
Current usage looks like a single channel would serve for both JT65 and JT9.
The JT9 channels, as the least used, could then be used for DX and Fox/Hound
operation. Hope the block allows it.
Al Pawlowski
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 9, 2018, at 20:50, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.
I like it. I see Field day as not only training, but PR and get together. All
three purposes are served by using/showing as many Ham activities as possible.
In fact, I plan to try operating WSJT modes myself during FD.
Al Pawlowski
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 10, 2018, at 08:22, wsjt-devel-r
An option setting, to call/send “n” (maybe 1 - 3) times after called person
responds to someone else and you are not on their frequency, seems like a
worthwhile idea to me.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 14:29:46 +
> From: Tom M0LTE mailto:t...@m0
17m), but only heard a few hounds and no foxes during the test on all
three bands. The few decodes I saw looked normal.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world&#x
decode performance, that too would
be nice. I do not remember yet having a FT8 decode below about -20, but
regularly had JT65’s below -25.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on
to have one of my
nearby friends to check my tx yet, but will be looking to do that before field
day.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
eng
changes
were made.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/sla
messages over-writable (like the current
single drop-down setup) and changing the “next” column targets to be selectors
of what messages will be not sent (skipped) in a tx cycle. Operator
experience/improvement, and having more of them in the contest, just takes time.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA
I would say B & C. Seems like it might be also be pretty useful for the hams
with mobile and other country calls.
C could probably be in the preferences windows though, as most people using the
function probably would do so almost always.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date:
t
> messages (you would probably have to avoid standard message forms
> somehow) but the rate of data exchange would probably be too slow for
> practical use other than maybe for telemetry of some sort.
Al
sense is
correct as there are that think it is reversed.
--
Al Pawlowski Los Osos, CA USA
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
FWIW, my experience (in ~3yrs of use): lowest JT65 decode about -28, JT9 about
-26, FT8 about -20.
I have gotten a few low level JT9 QSO’s at times when I could not get them on
JT65 - I suspect due to band activity.
My WSJT-X is set for 2-pass, 6 erasure and 10 aggression.
Al Pawlowski
would help scrolling through a long
decodes list during busy times.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Sep 21, 2018, at 22:43, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:09:03 -0500
> From: "K5GZR - Rick" mailto:k5...@comcast.net
ability may be a bit
better - I seem to be seeing more -22 and -24.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
more stable in amplitude and timing than the previous few
versions, i.e. apparently, some change has been made in the tx output
processing.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 14:26:41 + (UTC)
> From: Black Michael mailto:mdblac...@yahoo.com>>
&g
Put WSJT-X slider at -12 and got no change moving between 17m and 20m. Rather
than adjusting my PA settings, bumped output tx to ~100W by increasing my
PowerSDR tx input gain - easier.
I have not seen any problems with VAC, but will try the VoiceBanana for
comparison.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los
. Manual disable
tx and reset to CQ or time out to disable tx would (IMO) be preferable.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Setting does not seem to work in rc3 Windows. Tx still disabled after RR73 tx
with box unchecked and after WSJT close and restart.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Al Pawlowski
> Subject: Re: Another Case for Manual Advance on RR73 an
versions.
BTW, “where" says libeay32.dll is in two places on my machine: c:\program files
(x86)\intel\icls client\ and c:\program files\intel\icls client\.
And, for security, seems like WSJT-x should work with latest OpenSSL. But,
maybe that is a LoTW server issue.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los
associated with the “free” message
that did not seem to be in previous versions and, maybe, when the decoder is
really busy.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Nov 1, 2018, at 00:23, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> From: Dave Boniface mailto:m0hjs.i...@
Forgot to mention, these were for normal type callsigns.
> On Nov 1, 2018, at 09:30, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> From: Al Pawlowski
> To: WSJT software development
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 57, Issue 1
> Message-ID:
> Con
Al Pawlowski
> Subject: Re: wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 57, Issue 5
> Date: November 1, 2018 at 09:38:58 PDT
> To: WSJT software development
>
> Forgot to mention, these were for normal type callsigns.
>
>
>> On Nov 1, 2018, at 09:30, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wr
Yeah. Knew that, but like to have in in my saved stuff and easier to click a
target than type.
BTW, never noticed my reported sequencer problems before and have been using
the free message cq dx over many previous versions.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Nov 1, 2018, at 11
. And, I
am not sure, but think I remember the tab 1 sequence being followed even if I
would click on a tab 2 button - for instance click “73” and enable tx but CQ
sent.
I think this is using rc 2 and 3, and, I think rc1 - all Win versions on Win 10
home.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
There is definitely a problem with “free text” message sequencing in rc3. I
posted about not being able to answer a return to my free text CQ DX by double
clicking the caller, but have had a few other odd things happen too.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Nov 12, 2018, at 05
I look at it sort of like a new dx/band/state challenge.
I also do not restrict myself solely to tx above 2k and, sometimes, tx “CQ 77”.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Nov 19, 2018, at 07:12, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> [wsjt-devel] R
right, some of which were responses to my calls.
I also noticed the the colors needed to be reset (from none shown) after
switching the configurations back to default - I had to reset colors in
settings. I have seen this on previous rc’s also.
Running on Win10 Home.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos
know if this
is what should happen, but did not have any crash on my end. I completed one
QSO of the few I tried so that person, at least, did not seem to have a crash.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-
-contest mode, seems like it might be better for the sequencer
not to advance and kill the tx enable, i.e. let the operator hit kill.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:02:55 +
> From: Stephen Ireland mailto:vk3...@hotmail.com>>
> To: WSJT softw
I forgot about that box and was reminded about it some weeks ago. In any case,
it does not seem to work for me in rc3, and I think previously in rc2 - the box
is unchecked yet tx is still disabled when I send a 73.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 04:09, w
messages I’ve seen decode as (probably my 77
also, will not initiate a return/answer sequence on double click - you have to
start one manually (type callsign, generate messages, select TX1, enable tx).
So, I only send a couple of the CQ 77 messages and followed by a standard CQ,
or CQ DX.
Al
Actually, I have never seen one of my 77 messages as decoded - just assumed it
would decode as the bottom of pane tx message being sent read. I think all of
the non-standard messages I tried to answer by double-click had no numbers in
them, and they still did not auto-start.
Al Pawlowski
My vote is for keeping the tab 2 messages window/layout. I find tab 2 faster
for selecting the appropriate message and the “free text” message easier to use
- maybe it is the bigger/bolder select buttons, vs the undifferentiated (for
tx, rx), smaller selection targets of tab 1.
Al Pawlowski
entries (no room for
more). Windows 10 Home.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 12:07:00 -0500
> From: Bill Pence mailto:pence.b...@gmail.com>>
> To: marting0...@gmail.com <mailto:marting0...@gmail.com>, WSJT software
> development
>
minutes.
During this contest, I went was putting up xmas lights during the breaks.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Dec 3, 2018, at 07:57, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 07:39:21 -0800
> From: Bill mailto:brightl...@gmail.com&
wonder
if I should add in, or subtract, another 0.1s for the tx delay I have set.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Dec 3, 2018, at 20:27, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> From: Matt Power mailto:mhpo...@mit.edu>
> <mailto:mhpo...@mit.edu <m
right on, I get lots of zero DT’s. I wonder if others then would see me
at about +0.7s when they are in sync to gps and/or some NTP server.
Should I/we be hoping to see mostly fractional second +DT's (rather than zero)
for best operation?
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Dec 4,
I would like to see the Rig Connection Warning window functionality changed so
that it can be closed/dismissed without closing the whole program if a rig
connection problem is not fixed. At times, the current “shutdown or lockup
only” operation can be pretty annoying.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los
Can not remember the specific thing I was doing when it bugged me last -
probably experimenting with virtual audio, and radio, connection changes. In
any case, it seems to me that locking the program is overkill for the
triggering condition.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> D
Windows thing. I am using Windows 10 Home now on a 2.4GHz I5, but it was the
same on Windows 7pro and Windows 10pro on a 3.2GHz I3.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:28:58 +
> From: David Fisher mailto:dsfis...@outlook.com>>
> To: WSJT softw
; than the dipole and the vertical loop
is usually quieter than the horizontal loop.
I also have a rotatable, vertically mounted, small tuned loop (MFJ) which can,
at times, beat the LZ1AQ loops on rx SNR because of the tuning - the tradeoff,
of course, being bandwidth limits.
Al Pawlowski, K6AV
very helpful visual separation of tx groups for location
within the screen.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
period.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:28:15 +0200
> From: Saku mailto:oh...@sral.fi>>
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc3 Audio Issue - Issue
>
Been running with 0.1s for quite awhile. Started with 0.2s when first using
WSJTx, but do not remember any difference in the problem.
Anyway, put it on 0.2s and will see what happens after a few months - I don’t
see the problem too often.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date:
, which I will remove as my radio does not support them.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 25, 2021, at 06:20, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 13:32:26 +0100
> From: "Martin Davies G0HDB" <mailto:marting0...@gmail.
from 6 digits of frequency to 4.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 25, 2021, at 07:44, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 07:44:24 -0700
> From: "Dennis Younker NE6I" mailto:n...@cox.net>>
> To: mailto:mart
. Took me some time last night to find a few dupe’s I had.
3) At least for FD configurations, add a highlight color for Dupe and/or
New/Unworked call on band or mode. JTalert “B4” helped on this, but was far
from perfect.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
with noise. I
wonder if the limit is due to my CPU speed (usage increases with BW and channel
activity) or a WSJTx thing. Reports from others doing larger BW would be
interesting.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
I agree getting newer equipment regularly can be a problem. However, I have
seen many PSK Reporter spots of my CQ’s at around 4kHz (channel Tx) so there
does seem to be stations that can handle that range - i always use split mode,
so that probably helps.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
the
SDR program are restarted.
Running Win10 home. Problem showed up 3-4 weeks ago.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Jan 31, 2019, at 08:58, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:43:56 +
> From: Richard Solomon mailto:w1...
I have also had it kill the next tx during a QSO. A temporary delay/reset for
reply, or QSO in progress, would be nice.
Actually, I think a tx disable based on number of tx's without reply would be
better than a simple timeout.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Mar 2, 2019,
programs.
I use comm-0-comm (free) and Muschenko VAC (small license fee) with PowerSDR
mrx to operate my ANAN SDR.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Mar 18, 2019, at 04:03, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:10:43 -0400 (EDT)
>
I got 0.3db steps prior to v1/9. Then 0.1db in v1.9. I now get 0.3db steps in
v2. Not a big deal, but -0.1db is max drive before distortion on my setup.
I use the scroll wheel to set, which also shows the set value in digits.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Mar 23, 2019, at 07
allsign/AI”. Now, that would be interesting
automation, maybe, a real innovation and, maybe, not too far off.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Mar 30, 2019, at 11:49, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Someone rele
I wondered why I would occasionally see someone had spotted me on on band I was
not working.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 10:47:17 -0500
> From: "Ted Gisske" mailto:gis...@offex.com>>
> To: "'WSJT softwar
GPS synced time.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 8, 2019, at 18:07, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
>> On 06/05/2019 15:45, Joe Taylor wrote:
>>
>>
>> ………...Well I tried but didn't get very far, and gave up after 10 mi
I agree, FT4 QSO’s I made in uncrowded conditions before the contest were much
easier.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 22:16:43 -0400
> From: Edfel Rivera mailto:edfelj...@gmail.com>>
> To: WSJT software development <mailto:wsjt-devel@lis
Amen. Amen. At least make the decision to not tx advance after RR73 a user
choice.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 8, 2019, at 21:47, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 07:46:55 +0300
> From: Saku mailto:oh...@sral.fi>>
with v2.0.1.
Running 64bit rc5 on Win10, build 17763
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 9, 2019, at 02:56, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 06:13:12 + (UTC)
> From: Tom Ramberg mailto:oh6...@yahoo.com>>
> To: WSJT
No. Since installing rc5, I have not launched 2.0.1. Forgot to mention, I am
running the 64bit rc5 and it mostly happens after I close the rc5 settings
window after some kind of change. I think I have also seen it on a
configuration switch.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Ma
lower than CW or FT8. I don’t
think we had any other digital mode going, except to copy the W1AW message.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Jun 23, 2019, at 05:29, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:27:23 + (UTC)
> From: B
, wanted QSO’s and
propagation.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 20:11, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:21:36 +0100
> From: Bill Somerville mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>>
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourcef
want to purposely make yourself off to work someone special who is
off too much to work if you are on.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 21:45, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:45:31 +0300
> From: Sergio Yes UT9
.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Aug 4, 2019, at 05:12, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 13:30:01 +
> From: Andy Durbin mailto:a.dur...@msn.com>>
> To: "wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:
Pretty sure I have had the same thing happen a couple of times (during FT8/FT4
non-contest config) since installing 2.1.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Sep 1, 2019, at 05:17, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:44:03 +
>
button. I
happens so infrequently that I have never thought much about it - just figured
it as some computer glitch. Does not seem to happen any more frequently now
(using v2.1) than for any other version I have used.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 18:39, w
The occasional no audio/modulation fault (causing no power) is not a band edge
issue - it has happened to me at various in-band frequencies and using "fake
it” split mode.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 13:39, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.n
Unfortunately, I can not connect the no-audio tx fault to any particular
operation, including in the next cycle after the disable of an in-progress tx.
In fact, I did 6-8 of that kind of tx halt just yesterday without seeing the
problem.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Sep 7, 2
This seems like it could be a really usable feature. I know I have hesitated to
jump to a dx’s frequency for fear of covering up someone else I can’t see/hear.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Dec 1, 2019, at 16:19, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Dat
CQ’r finishes an established QSO.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
, if unchecking “decodes at bottom” and checking “blank
line between periods”, some late decodes would show at top without the dashed
line.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 15, 2020, at 05:52, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020
t for
me. BTW, setting the radio’s tx filter to 600Hz works well with split also -
wish it were a deviation type filter so I could tighten it more.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 17, 2020, at 06:31, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Sun, 17 May
ending tx if the other person does
not repeat his.
BTW, I like that WSJTx will now (since v2.1.2, I think) delay disabling tx of
this ending repeat for three times automatically.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 19, 2020, at 08:07, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wr
If so, maybe WSJTx should only do the tx5 message atuomatically when it is not
set to the default .
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 19, 2020, at 09:11, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 12:05:27 -0400
> From: Neil Zampel
A nice new feature for WSJTx might be to not reset the custom (tx5) message (to
CS 73) for a QSO and instead skip, or end with, tx5 depending on the message
content, i.e. a blank (or *** say) in the window would mean skip - it might
even make sense to make the skip message the default.
Al
sent.
BTW, in testing this on 4 QSO’s, all 4 of my QSO partners sent multiple
RRR/RR73’s (after not getting a 73 from me).
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Al Pawlowski
> Subject: Re: Clicking on RR73 produced wrong TX response msg
&g
WSJTx log without having to remember where
it is, when you don’t have your radio on. Why can not WSJTx stay open running
in standby like any other normal program when no radio is connected?
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 27, 2020, at 07:58, wsjt-devel-r
work done to make it available.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On May 27, 2020, at 10:04, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 17:29:53 +0100
> From: Bill Somerville mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>>
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourcef
latest) would not work for me
with OpenHPSDR on Win10 2004. I have provided details to Muzychenko.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Forgot to say radio does not turn off, if on, when WSJTx is closed.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 08:45:15 -0700
> From: Al Pawlowski mailto:k6...@almont.com>>
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 08:49:50 -0700
> From: Al Pawlowski mailto:k6...@almont.com>>
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] v2.1.2
No. That box is unchecked in my setup.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Jun 8, 2020, at 16:31, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Do you have "Monitor returns to last used frequency" turned on?
> That will cause the rig to wake up as it ha
Saw the same thing yesterday - about 3 times. Got an error box behind windows
for second. Said JT9.exe Killed by name return call - or similar.
Happened only during FT4 and when things were pretty busy. Nothing last couple
hours of this morning. Running Win10-64 latest.
Al Pawlowski
Los Osos
was sent/received because I was not fast
enough or needed to resend an (uncopied) 73.
Al Pawlowski
Los Osos, CA USA
> On Jun 29, 2020, at 19:01, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:53:26 -0400
> From: Terry Estes mailto:w...@arrl.net>>
If you mouse over the Tx message # boxes (in 2.5 anyway), an info message will
appear. For Tx4, it tells you how to set the Tx4 message to either RR73 or RRR.
If you set it for RRR, the auto-sequence will move to Tx5 which has a default
of 73. If you set it for RR73, it will skip Tx5 and go to T
I was just about to report this too - I use WSJTx in Windows. Glad the
change/bug has been caught and will be fixed.
FWIW, I have WSJTx opening on an “expanded desktop” (21”) monitor attached to
my (17”) laptop. WSJTx does remember the previous left side positioning, but
not the last set width,
fixed.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
not occur - does
appear to be a 2.5.2 (maybe CAT hamlib) problem. Of course, now I have the main
window not remembering its previous size problem, which is fixed in 2.5.2 - for
me at least.
> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 14:43:53 -0800
> From: Al Pawlowski mailto:k6...@almont.com>>
>
. Replacement dll create date
11/12/2021.
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Al Pawlowski
> Subject: Re: wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 93, Issue 25
> Date: November 11, 2021 at 07:50:03 PST
> To: WSJT software development
>
> The VAC sound problem seems to be gone now - b
wer out with WSJTx output set for -0.3dB, higher
settings add distortion.
Maybe a separate X6100 driver setup with default 19200 port speed, handshake
and mode should be added to HamLib. Probably, the DTS/DTR = high and Mode = Rig
not working should be further investigated also.
Al Pawlowski, K6
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
