Hi,
(sorry for not responding earlier, I've been on vacation last week and
it took me a while to advance through my mail to this thread.)
Am Samstag, den 06.10.2007, 11:17 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Recent discussions make it obvious to me that we need to come to
terms with Zope 3 releases.
Hey,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.10.2007, 13:43 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
I'm skeptical that such a tool can do that much. Certainly, when we
broke the trunk up, we didn't know what all the issues would be. We
couldn't automate a process we didn't yet fully understand. My only
real regret is
Am Donnerstag, den 04.10.2007, 12:47 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
Hi Theune,
I updated instructions here:
http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/StabilizeEggPackages .
Can you please review it ?
Thanks for following the discussions and changing that page, I read the
diff and think it's ok
Am Freitag, den 28.09.2007, 10:06 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
zc.testbrowser 1.0a1
I am very pleased to announce the first alpha release of
zc.testbrowser: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.testbrowser
zc.testbrowser is a refactoring of zope.testbrowser to remove the
Hi,
Zagy and I are trying to make z3c.form compatible with sources. We had
to investigate zope.schema for that and found the mess of vocabularies
and sources that is still around.
Here are some facts we found:
- The Choice field has an attribute `vocabulary` which it says to be an
We have another case of faulty released eggs.
I reviewed the first that popped up for me, which was
zope.app.publication:
- someone uploaded a stable 3.4.1 egg, but this is just a snapshot
from the trunk, there is no tag for this release.
- the egg does not contain data files correctly.
to do (Roger, maybe you can do that?):
- Remove the broken files.
- Create tags for the wrong trunk releases
- Create a new release and tag in tar format.
I'll show what I mean by releasing a fix for zope.app.i18n.
Am Mittwoch, den 26.09.2007, 08:16 + schrieb Christian Theune:
We have another
Am Mittwoch, den 26.09.2007, 08:49 + schrieb Christian Theune:
Hey,
here is an update.
The issue is that the eggs were released as ZIP files and for some
reason those don't work correctly with the data files.
I can reproduce the problem by creating the packages myself as ZIP files
Am Mittwoch, den 26.09.2007, 14:39 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
We decided not to bump minor release in trunk recently while making
these final release, is it ?
I tried looking for that but didn't find that decision, so I thought
we're doing maintenance branches.
--
gocept gmbh co. kg -
Am Mittwoch, den 26.09.2007, 11:53 +0200 schrieb Stefan H. Holek:
WinZip has the habit of ignoring files it deems empty and paths it
deems too long. Best to avoid.
Nothing about winzip. The files are in there. I also couldn't find an
issue in the egg info files.
--
gocept gmbh co. kg -
Am Mittwoch, den 26.09.2007, 09:16 -0400 schrieb Stephan Richter:
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 04:49, Christian Theune wrote:
The issue is that the eggs were released as ZIP files and for some
reason those don't work correctly with the data files.
I can reproduce the problem by creating
Hey,
Zagy asked about this a while ago:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2007-August/thread.html
Our feeling is that better default error messages would be welcome and
the breakage that this might cause would be acceptable.
I'd be happy to implement this tomorrow, a bit more explicit
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 23.09.2007, 23:52 +0200 schrieb Philipp von
Weitershausen:
I understand the motivation. But I don't agree with the solution. I've
you're not ok with the existing views, then you currently have two options
* Simply *ignore* that they exist. Zope actually has facilities
Hi,
the tests of z3c.formdemo on the trunk are broken. Is this intended?
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 02:49 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On 9/14/07, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before I'll revert the layer-support will be there in a third party
package, probably using ++api++.
Better to be specific than general when it's for a specific type of
Am Sonntag, den 08.07.2007, 11:31 -0400 schrieb Stephan Richter:
On Sunday 08 July 2007 10:02, Christian Theune wrote:
Log message for revision 77624:
More work on bug 98287: Introduced an event to signal that an object
value is going to be assigned.
Ahh, this is crazy! Why would
Hi,
(sorry for the cross-post, please do not reply on this list, please use
zodb-dev or mail me in private for discussions, I won't post for this
issue on these lists again)
gocept received interest in finishing the ZEORaid project and we're
trying to do a fund-raising round. If you're
Am Freitag, den 31.08.2007, 23:35 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On 8/31/07, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's is what I am most worried about. I really need to look into this to
see
how much things changed. Maybe not as much as we tend to think.
I think the changes will be
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 31.08.2007, 13:06 +0200 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
Is there documentation on sources anywhere? The last time I checked
there was nothing that I could understand either in zope.* or
on the wiki.
It took me a while to understand them myself. Especially as there is
some code
Am Freitag, den 31.08.2007, 14:04 +0200 schrieb Christophe Combelles:
I was still using vocabularies, but it seems interesting, thanks for the
explanation!
So it basically looks like a vocabulary, with the token and title parts being
seperated and optional.
Right, and with defaults (I tried
Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2007, 23:21 -0400 schrieb Tom Hoffman:
Are there any firm plans for getting Zope 3.4 final out into the
world? The next release of SchoolTool, which we intended to have
included in Ubuntu Gutsy, is dependent on Zope 3.4, which seemed like
a reasonable idea when Zope 3.4
Am Mittwoch, den 29.08.2007, 13:04 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
Is that TODO list available online somewhere?
It's now: http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/StabilizeEggPackages
I think I can spend sometime for this in this week.
I am starting with zope.annotation , for zope.annotation
the next release is
Am Mittwoch, den 29.08.2007, 09:58 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On 8/29/07, srichter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
++added:
- Ensure that the setup.py has a decent set of meta-data, in particular:
* The long_description contains all doctests.
I know Jim's advocated this, at least for all
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2007, 07:55 +0200 schrieb Jodok Batlogg:
hi christian,
it seems like your recent changes to support skins in xmlrpc views
introduced some troubles.
we spent several hours to debug not working xmlrpc views and finally
found that nailing the zope.traversing egg
Am Samstag, den 25.08.2007, 17:57 -0400 schrieb Zvezdan Petkovic:
Obviously, a visual perception differs from person to person. If a
person has a difficulty reading getMainType(), they should not be
forced to write get_main_type() in their Zope code for the sake of
consistency which is in
Am Sonntag, den 26.08.2007, 21:52 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Am Samstag, den 25.08.2007, 17:57 -0400 schrieb Zvezdan Petkovic:
Obviously, a visual perception differs from person to person. If a
person has a difficulty reading getMainType(), they should not be
forced to write
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2007, 09:05 -0400 schrieb Stephan Richter:
On Friday 24 August 2007 04:00, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
What should we do about this?
Well, I personally think for a programming API the error message is okay. The
__repr__ could be better though, I agree.
For forms
the dependencies of zope.app.testing to include
zope.app.publication to a required minimum version or I can change this
to use a different lookup mechanism.
Christian
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:01 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
zope.traversing has a dependency
Am Mittwoch, den 22.08.2007, 16:15 -0400 schrieb Tres Seaver:
I eventually came to the conclusion that our original conclusion was
sound, but that we should only introduce backward incompatibilities
when the need is very dire, as it will cause lots of pain.
+1 from me as well.
+1.
Am Mittwoch, den 22.08.2007, 21:00 +0200 schrieb Adam Groszer:
Hello,
Is there a sane way to stop permission propagation to sublocations?
Let's say I have a site, and somewhere below there is a folder as a
trashcan, unneeded objects get moved to here. Users must not modify
objects in the
Am Mittwoch, den 22.08.2007, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
At the moment zalchemy is making buildout complain about connection
errors. The problem is that on
http://cheeseshop.python.org/simple/z3c.zalchemy there is a link to
https://svn.zope.org.repos/main which does not exist: there
Hi,
Am Montag, den 20.08.2007, 08:59 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On 8/20/07, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should add a function to validate a given schema on a given
class. This should include constraints and invariants:
I do presume you mean object, rather than
Am Montag, den 20.08.2007, 16:05 +0200 schrieb Philipp von
Weitershausen:
This is exactly what I would suggest: The function should return a list
of validation errors. Similar semantics are used in zope.formlib's
validate() method. I agree with Wichert's objection about being a bit
Am Montag, den 20.08.2007, 14:27 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
No, I'm wrong, I'm going to back these changes out with a b30 release
and then release them with a 2x release.
Will the 2x release be picked up automatically because the stable policy
isn't in 1x and it tries to update itself?
Oh
Am Donnerstag, den 16.08.2007, 13:37 +0200 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
The cheeseshop lists a 0.2 version of z3c.zalchemy but in subversion I
only see tags for 0.1 and 0.1.1. svn trunk lists 0.2 as unreleased in
CHANGES.txt.
What is the status of z3c.zalchemy 0.2? Is it really released, or
Am Donnerstag, den 16.08.2007, 17:36 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
Was this problem related to Python 2.5 update ?
It was not, it was just a suspicion of me and it was wrong.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub:
Hi,
zope.traversing has a dependency to zope.app.applicationcontroller. This
is because zope.traversing implements the etc namespace and has a hard
coded reference to applicationcontrol there.
In the same place it also looks up site managers (in a hard coded way).
As a strategy to remove this
Hi,
I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
people that they had severe problems managing around this. I removed the
3.4b4 distribution from download.zope.org to allow them to continue
using zopeproject and grokproject until we find a fix.
I wasn't sure about
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
people that they had severe problems managing around this. I removed the
3.4b4 distribution from download.zope.org to allow them to continue
using
Hey,
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
people that they had severe problems managing around this. I removed the
3.4b4 distribution from download.zope.org to allow them to continue
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 17:52 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
people
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 17:59 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Where is this b5? I am still getting b4, not b5. I can't find b5 on the
server.
I've put it there now. The actual distribution was missing. I've created
the b5 tag and uploaded the sdist package.
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 12:02 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On Aug 15, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
I'm not sure that we should have to rely on removing packages like
those.
I'm fairly sure that removing them is *not* the right solution. For
example, that might have
Am Montag, den 13.08.2007, 12:14 +0200 schrieb Bernd Dorn:
On 12.08.2007, at 22:55, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Christian
Betreff: [Zope3-dev] Retire zope.app.boston
Please. It's badly tested and I assume widely unused. I tried
to fix a bug that was reported for it and it's just a
Please. It's badly tested and I assume widely unused. I tried to fix a
bug that was reported for it and it's just a mess.
Christian
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub:
Can someone comment on this?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/98380
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Hi,
I'd like to propose spending some time together bashing some bugs before
doing the release candidate for Zope 3.4.
My calendar is pretty stuffed, but I'd be happy to spend the larger part
of an afternoon next week.
Christian
___
Zope3-dev mailing
Hi,
if I remember correctly we don't have a conclusion on what official
Zope packages are.
I have a specific motivation and a (hopefully) specific question:
I am happy to take a part of a broader maintenance/development effort
from the Zope Project into my hands and contribute on a larger scale
Am Mittwoch, den 25.07.2007, 10:05 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
I think this discussion might be better held on the foundation list.
FYI: I moved the discussion to the foundation list.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub:
Am Samstag, den 21.07.2007, 21:58 +0530 schrieb Nikhil N:
Hi,
Majority of the satellite projects are working in Python2.5 as given by
the status in the wiki : http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/ModuleImplementationStatus
So please ensure that your changes will also work in Python2.5. I
also
When starting to implement the ReusableAction feature, I noticed that
we're not using launchpad correctly now.
I'm not sure what else we do wrong, so I started a proposal on what we
need to do to start using launchpad right again.
See http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/SatellitesAndLaunchpad
Christian
As this didn't spur any resistance, I'll be implementing this now.
I'll make a b1 release of zope.configuration and move the trunk of
zope.configuration to 3.5 after that, my changes will go to a
working-branch first.
Christian
Am Dienstag, den 10.07.2007, 16:06 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On
Am Dienstag, den 10.07.2007, 17:37 +0300 schrieb Philipp von
Weitershausen:
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 10:31 +0300 schrieb Gary Poster:
Christian et al:
What do you want in regards to the zope.app.session changes that rely
on the new package zope.minmax
Am Sonntag, den 08.07.2007, 11:31 -0400 schrieb Stephan Richter:
On Sunday 08 July 2007 10:02, Christian Theune wrote:
Log message for revision 77624:
More work on bug 98287: Introduced an event to signal that an object
value is going to be assigned.
Ahh, this is crazy! Why would
Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 10:31 +0300 schrieb Gary Poster:
Christian et al:
What do you want in regards to the zope.app.session changes that rely
on the new package zope.minmax? Very briefly, the change allows the
simple zope.app.session approach to cause fewer unnecessary write
Hi,
I see a failing test in the buddydemo both on the buildbot and on my
checkout of the trunk:
http://buildbot.zope.org/Zope3%20trunk%202.4%20Linux%
20zc-buildbot/builds/1045/test_2/0
It appears not to happen with the egg release.
Christian
___
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2007, 09:43 +0300 schrieb Gary Poster:
However, did the tree just grow a dependency on zope.minmax as well?
Yes and no. I made a zope.app.session 3.4 branch with no
dependencies on zope.minmax. That is what the tree currently uses.
The tree also
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2007, 08:57 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I see a failing test in the buddydemo both on the buildbot and on my
checkout of the trunk:
http://buildbot.zope.org/Zope3%20trunk%202.4%20Linux%
20zc-buildbot/builds/1045/test_2/0
It appears not to happen
+1
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2007, 16:32 +0200 schrieb Philipp von
Weitershausen:
Christian Theune wrote:
I've made the release branch for Zope 3.4, you can feel free to start
introducing changes for Zope 3.5 into the trunk of the tree.
It should be noted that the 'Zope3' tree actually
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 06:19 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
we have some packages around that have x.x.x.dev x.x.x-dev and i
think they are considered newer than x.x.xa1
a .dev release is older than a .a1 release (or a1). The '-' makes a
post-release tag, so x.x.x-dev is later
Am Mittwoch, den 27.06.2007, 11:36 -0400 schrieb Gary Poster:
My current opinion is that version numbers are the best solution of a
bad lot.
My current opinion is that we don't have a final story on how all the
pieces we have now: multiple eggs with seperate lives, buildout,
setuptools,
Am Samstag, den 23.06.2007, 07:04 -0400 schrieb Gary Poster:
Hey Christian. I intend to check in some code that fixes
zope.app.keyreference conflict error issues I wrote about last week.
This will take advantage of some code that I checked in to the ZODB,
that I don't intend to be part
Am Mittwoch, den 20.06.2007, 12:17 +0200 schrieb Philipp von
Weitershausen:
Brian Sutherland wrote:
SchoolTool finds itself depending on optionstorage, which is a very zope
specific egg. It has never been released, despite being in subversion
for a long time.
Firstly, I'd like to make
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 19.06.2007, 18:18 +0200 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
Hi Christian
Betreff: [Zope3-dev] deprecate ++etc++site/default?
Hi there,
as far as I am informed it's no longer suggested to put
utilities etc.
into the default package since the whole package mechanism
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 08.06.2007, 19:03 +0200 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
Maybe a newer mailman version has the bug fixed?
Might be. We're currently trying to get rid of the mailman hosting for
zope.org. We're in a waiting state as launchpad announced they would to
mailman hosting in a few months
Hi
Am Donnerstag, den 07.06.2007, 16:53 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
Hi,
I would like merge `baijum-experimental-zwiki` to zwiki trunk.
http://svn.zope.org/zwiki/branches/baijum-experimental-zwiki/
The major changes are:
1) Added buildout support
2) Moved code to `src` folder
3) Use a
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 03.06.2007, 22:20 +0200 schrieb Martijn Pieters:
On 6/3/07, Michael Haubenwallner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fresh checkouts from trunk are broken:
today zodbcode and RestrictedPython were moved to 'satellite's.
They are still missing / not available through
Ah,
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 10:12 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on
major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the
following occurred to me:
[...]
Ah, I think it's a good idea. And it would still allow
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 11:12 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On May 31, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 10:56 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Would a requirement of foobar 2.1* mean every stable release of
foobar 2.1 and all micro versions
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 11:14 -0400 schrieb Tres Seaver:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
What do you mean by a dev release?
Any release tagged as alpha, beta, rc, pre, or with an SVN revision.
I agree with Tres' goal. I think setuptools refers to
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 11:28 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On May 31, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 11:14 -0400 schrieb Tres Seaver:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
What do you mean by a dev release
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 15:12 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
Jim Fulton wrote:
It's actually worse than that. 2.0 would admit 2.0a1. :) You'd
probably need something like 1.99.
I can deal with spelling dependencies on major version X as = X.999.
Even if developers remembered,
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 15:30 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Not as icky (IMHO) as having distribution names with embedded major
version numbers. I'm interested in other people's opinions here.
I don't like version numbers encoded in package names. I consider this
to be a
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 17:13 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
=app-misc/foo-1.23 Version 1.23 or later is required.
app-misc/foo-1.23 A version strictly later than 1.23 is required.
~app-misc/foo-1.23 Version 1.23 (or any 1.23-r*) is required.
=app-misc/foo-1.23 Exactly version
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 17:13 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
How would you say that you want version 1.23 or higher but less than
any version 2?
I re-read their spec and they say:
=sys-apps/foo-1.2* will select the newest member of the 1.2 series, but
will ignore 1.3 and later/earlier
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 18:12 +0200 schrieb Maciej Wisniowski:
Thanks. BTW, I am still looking for 1-2 demos to write but I am out of
ideas.
Do have anything related to forms that you would like to see demoed?
It would be very interesting to see RDBMS interaction. Formlib for
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 22.05.2007, 20:56 +0300 schrieb Marius Gedminas:
Is there any documentation about how to extract the Python level stack
trace when you've attached to a Python program at C level with gdb?
(One of my fantasies (i.e. projects I'll never find the time to work on)
is adding
Yay!
Am Mittwoch, den 16.05.2007, 20:32 -0700 schrieb Simon Michael:
FYI - I installed a cleaned-up http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/FrontPage (the
old one is at http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/FrontPage1). I think it's a step
forward, hope you agree.
I also cleaned up
Hi,
the buildout of zope.app.apidoc and some other packages is currently
broken.
A potential candidate causing this is zope.event. As soon as buildout
says picked zope.event== the python process goes to 100% CPU and
stays there until I kill it.
strace doesn't tell anything, but I don't have
Am Montag, den 14.05.2007, 10:07 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
the buildout of zope.app.apidoc and some other packages is currently
broken.
A potential candidate causing this is zope.event. As soon as buildout
says picked zope.event== the python process goes to 100% CPU
Ah. There was another subtle difference in the environment that I
initially overlooked. buildout was installed site-wide.
For the records: I've re-checked and filed a bug at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zc.buildout/+bug/114614
Am Montag, den 14.05.2007, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
I
Hi,
b1 didn't land over the weekend as you noticed. We're running late
again, but we're moving.
Almost all of the packages in the zope namespace have been moved out of
the Zope3 tree by now.
There are four remaining:
zope.app.winservice
zope.app.workflow
zope.app.zopetop
zope.app.pythonpage
A
Hi,
while moving on to Zope 3.4 beta, I had the need to assure that all the
zope.* packages are actually working.
I investigated a couple of options and finally decided for buildout.
The result is visible here: http://uter.gocept.com:/
I gave buildbot a new Web UI that allows easier
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 09:27 -0400 schrieb Gary Poster:
This is awesome, Christian. Thanks!
Is there a way to see the buildbot output? Will there be a way?
Kind of and yes. :)
I'm trying to fit this in my schedule as good as possible. You'll see
more nice things pop up soon.
Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 10:02 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
Christian Theune wrote:
buildout alread did not report an error correctly at some point, but
the next step currently breaks then, so it's only a minor glitch.
That sounds like https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113085.
Yup. Thanks
Am Freitag, den 04.05.2007, 06:51 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On May 4, 2007, at 6:25 AM, Baiju M wrote:
...
We will be using same Zope 3 resources for bug tracking, mailing list
and wiki for these satellite project's, is it ?
Thanks a very good question. I don't think we need more mailing
Right.
Am Freitag, den 04.05.2007, 07:55 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
I think what's happened is something very simple, inevitable, and
reasonable: We've stopped working on Zope 3 and moved to working on
our applications.
This changes how we think about the place of Zope 3 in our work more
Am Freitag, den 04.05.2007, 12:16 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
Christian Theune wrote:
Same here. I'm feeling like I'm not yet understanding what the trunk
will be used like.
I'm wondering if we need to maintain a Zope 3 project with any code in
it at all (or nearly so). Could Zope 3 just
Hi,
I've been trying to find a solution to run the individual tests of all
top-level projects in the repository.
I've set up a cruise control server in our office that
monitors the SVN and automatically picks up any top-level project that
defines a buildout.cfg in its trunk.
You can watch it
figuring out whether buildbot can fit into this picture a
little bit better.
Christian
Am Freitag, den 04.05.2007, 19:16 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I've been trying to find a solution to run the individual tests of all
top-level projects in the repository.
I've set up a cruise control
Hey,
Am Mittwoch, den 02.05.2007, 09:36 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On May 2, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 02.05.2007 um 15:12 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Assuming that you have a checkout of the trunk zc.form, then you
are mistaken. The version number in the setup.py file:
Hey,
I'm in front of the same wall that Fred was going up. ;)
I talked to Zagy about the problems we're facing with the current egg
releases of projects that live in Zope3/src/zope/ and
Zope3/src/zope/app/ and wrote this up a bit:
Problems
When working with eggs, we need to carefully
Hey,
Am Donnerstag, den 03.05.2007, 08:59 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On 5/3/07, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a small side note: I still don't know how we recommend using the eggs
in a way that says I want the egg-version of Zope 3.4.0 and the users
gets those eggs (and only
Am Donnerstag, den 03.05.2007, 08:55 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On 5/3/07, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in front of the same wall that Fred was going up. ;)
And I ran up against a related issue again on Tuesday, which I've not
had the time to write up.
- Move the code
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 03.05.2007, 18:23 -0400 schrieb Tres Seaver:
Typically whenever somebody who knows both decides that the satellite
has changes which need pulling into Z3; at the latest, they get updated
when doing a Z3 release, I would guess. This is like what happens now
with ZODB,
Hey,
Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2007, 08:14 +0200 schrieb Christian Zagrodnick:
Hi there,
now there those wonderful eggs for Zope 3. Apart from the permission
problem we ran into lately there is another one with those eggs:
The dependencies aren't set right.
Apparently nobody every ran
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2007, 11:11 +0200 schrieb Philipp von
Weitershausen:
Maybe, but:
3.3 3.3.1 3.4dev etc.
That's right. I missed that one.
:/
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889
Hey everybody,
our schedule plans the beta 1 for Zope 3.4 on 3rd of May. That's next
week and it includes a feature freeze for Zope 3.4.
So ladies and gentlemen: get your features wrapped up and merged. :)
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
Yay!
Is this agreed strategy once on is on the wall?
:)
Christian
Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2007, 14:00 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
The giant Zope 3 checkout / shadow project dichotomy is driving me
up the wall. For code that (really) lives in the Zope 3 checkout, it's
difficult to deal with
1 - 100 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
