program, which you can read here:
http://charles-miroir.plessy.org/debian/dialign-2.1.1/license/LICENSE.TXT
Does in mean that B. Morgenstern abandons his rights to S. Abdeddaim ?
Thank you a lot for your help,
--
Charles Plessy
Wako, Saitama, Japon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
to academic users, and require a commercial licence
from industrial users.
[Please CC me, I am not subscribed]
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
http://charles.plessy.org
Wakō, Saitama, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
that include a link to a remote
non-free Google javascript.
Thanks a lot for your help !
(and please CC me)
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in this email, you can read
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507579 for more details).
Le Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:12:30PM -0800, Walter Landry a écrit :
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you have a look to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507579
Le Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:33:12AM +0900, Paul Wise a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am doing some pilot tagging to implement my idea of peer review for the
`debian/copyright' file.
How about using user debian-legal@lists.debian.org
for copyright
documentation.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Le Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:03:03PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:57:28 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightNotices
Could you please explicitly state (in the wiki page itself) the license
under which the wiki page is released?
All my
Le Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:57:28PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
It appeared in various discussions about either DEP5 or the NEW queue that
licenses vary in their requirement for reproducing the authors copyrights in
binary distributions. In order to start clarifying the situation, I
Le Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:52:40PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
|
| There is no such thing as “putting a work in the public domain”, you
| America-centered, Commonwealth-biased individual. Public domain varies
| with the jurisdictions, and it is in some places debatable whether
| someone
Le Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 09:10:10AM +0100, MJ Ray a écrit :
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
It appeared in various discussions about either DEP5 or the NEW queue that
licenses vary in their requirement for reproducing the authors copyrights in
binary distributions. [...]
I wonder
Le Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:02:42PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
If you are convinced that a public-domain-like situation is actually
desirable, then, AFAIK, the best way to achieve it is the Creative
Commons public domain dedication [1], or possibly CC0 [2].
[1]
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a “copy”?
Le Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:10:29PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Why not? I personally think that a compiled copy of the software is
indeed a copy.
What other
Le Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 07:00:23AM +0200, Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Charles Plessy:
- The GPL, that assumes that the source is always available, and therefore
does not have special requirements for binary distributions.
This is incorrect. If the binary includes copyright statements
repository that your users can add in their source list.
http://wiki.debian.org/HowToSetupADebianRepository
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
clauses are accepted in Debian by our archive
administrators.
See for instance
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/j/jhdf/jhdf_2.5-3/libjhdf5-jni.copyright
Have a nice Sunday,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ
day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
distribution and is
copyright by the regents of the university of California, you can not use
the copy in /usr/share/common-license and have to include it verbatim. Luckily,
it is short :)
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ
that they
already got it, they can close the bug with an upload that corrects the Debian
copyright file, and otherwise the bug can be reassigned to ftp.debian.org as a
request for removal.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ
another good reason to remove the package. Does it provide
functionalities that are not found in other packages?
(the answer to this question is off-topic on debian-legal, so if necessary
continuing that part of the discussion in the bug report would be preferable).
Have a nice day,
--
Charles
/gpl-faq.html#v2v3Compatibility
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100306015340.gc12
/azureus2/core3/util/BrokenMd5Hasher.java
Copyright: 2005, jMuleGroup
License: GPL-2
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
[CC Jakub Drnec because I correct one statement I made earlier this
year about the MSNTP license]
Le Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:44:11PM +0100, Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Charles Plessy:
I think that Clause 1 disallows for-profit distribution. Can a redistributor
burn a CD and sell
sunday,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100321014305.ga31...@kunpuu.plessy.org
works are solely in
the
form of machine-executable object code generated by a source language
processor.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Le Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:56:44PM -0500, Joe Neal a écrit :
http://wonko.com/post/jsmin-isnt-welcome-on-google-code
Hi Joe,
have you seen the comment of Joey Hess, that it ‘Looks like the jsmin.py in
libv8 is now a reimplementation with a standard license.’
Have a nice week-end,
--
,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100409003426.ga28...@kunpuu.plessy.org
.
It is the addition of extra clauses and vague disclaimers that sometimes make
licenses non-free (clauses like ‘do not kill people with my software’), so
let's resist to temptation of making our license statements longer than what
is necessary.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
of the MIT and BSD
licenses, so their requrirement that ‘Redistributions in binary form must
reproduce the above copyright notice…’ still fully applies: you have to quote
them entirely.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ
difficult to maintain.
So it looks like a bad start…
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110112232147.ga20
reproduction, unless it is the will of the copyright holders
to have their names accompanying each and every derivative. But can you imagine
the mess if one had to track which contributor to acknowledge when reproducing
an extract of the human genome ?
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med
Le Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:16:26AM +0100, Harald Jenny a écrit :
I also thought about this but as the license text for the University of
California differes slightly from the one of Petr Rehor I wasn't sure this is
the correct way to do it - I also thought about:
Oops, I missed this as the
.
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110307100240.gc22...@merveille.plessy.net
Le Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:06:22AM +0100, Bruno Lowagie a écrit :
Op 7/03/2011 11:02, Charles Plessy schreef:
Regardless of the purpose and the intentions behind requiring to ‘retain the
producer line in every PDF that is created or manipulated using iText’, if
this
addition to the AGPL
, after undelining the potential problems.
This may be a good opportunity to ask them if they would kindly consider
a free license, or at least a non-free license that is already in Debian.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal
a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
minimalistic license that have a very short
disclaimer,
like the GNU All-Permissive license:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ
. government employees).
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2015082442.ga27
Le Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:49:47AM -0500, Hendrik Weimer a écrit :
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
The public-domain short name is reserved for cases where the work is
really in the public domain in the strict legal sense of it; this is a
rare case (for instance, some works of U
advertisemnt clause…
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111213231832.gc19
/html/whydisclaim.html
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120108091050.gd1
reason to go for relicensing or
copyright disclaiming instead.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
repository.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
,
unfinished project)
Regardless of the license, this calls in question whether this piece of code is
fit for the level of support expected for a Debian package. If there are
possible replacements that are actively maintaine, it may pay off to switch to
them.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
.
Thefore, while the validity of this concept of default license may be
questionable, I do not think that it is non-free.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
. But I am not a native
speaker. If it is the meaning of the Internet2 license that both parties must
sign a document in order to “enter into a written license agreement”, then it
is not a free license.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
stated by that paragraph. For the copyright statements, the current practice
is to reproduce them and optionally combine them. If they are missing, then
there is nothing to reproduce.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ
the Debian copryight files.
Have a nice day, and thank you very much for maintaining xul-ext-zotero !
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
a proprietary web
service encapsulating Picviz.
Similarly, it looks like the GPL considers the the build and install system as
part of the source code, and the clarification that Picviz should not be
installed via InstallShield looks therefore unnecessary.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi
, it looks that the npm license is free.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120311015132
the behaviour of virtaal, which will propose to pre-fill
tranlsations with the output of Microsoft Translator. If it is not possible to
translate copylefted text with such services, maybe the functionality should be
disabled by default ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa
.
For the resulting translations, however, I think that I agree that there is no
copyright claimed on them, and that they can be freely added to the original
project.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/03/msg00031.html
.
By the way, can you confirm if the following terms of service are relevant to
Google Translate ?
.
http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/terms/#toc-content
.
Have a nice week-end,
.
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
, the SQLite public domain dedication, or the GNU
all-permissive license.
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
http://www.sqlite.org/copyright.html
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files.html
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa
of this License » only applies to derivatives
(called adatpations in version 3.0). Section 4.a, which applies to the
original work, does not give this permission.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
for a clarification to one of the current mainstream
distributors ?
http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/Cat?target=httpcat=I/259
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
harmless Adobe against any losses, damages and costs arising
from the claims, lawsuits or other legal actions arising out of such
distribution.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
are in a subdirectory, the grep
command can also be run on '*/*.copyright' instead of recursively; this will
remove some noise as Subversion keeps copies in subdirectories.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Le Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:54:05PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño a écrit :
On the package kstars-data-extra-tycho2 it has arisen a doubt about its
distributability: See bug #681654
On Martes, 21 de agosto de 2012 02:55:43 Charles Plessy wrote:
sorry to discard the arguments you
, perhaps you or others can
consider asking for a change to the NM templates via a bug reported to
nm.debian.org.
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
to be a (re-)distribution issue. Rather, the
need for an additional agreement with CAcert.
Hello Raphael,
could it be a very strangely phrased disclaimer of warranty ? That
A lets B rely on A, is similar to A warrants to B.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
« Debian » is still distributed under a
persmissive license on www.debian.org/logos, so anybody who worries about
license incompatibilities can make a backup now, and redistribute it under its
permissive license later if it looks useful.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
considers that in the statement in 681654#52, cannot charge for the
data means the same as not sold by themselves in the OFL, then it would be
consistent to keep kstars-data-extra-tycho2 in Debian, as SIL-OFL-licensed
works are allowed.
Have a nice Sunday,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Le Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:15:01AM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:02:13 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
Catalogues available at CDS contain scientific data distributed
for free, for a scientific usage.
[...]
Doesn't this fail DFSG#6 ?
Hi,
given
copyright files from
svn://anonscm.debian.org/collab-qa/packages-metadata/ I see that many chose
contents such as none, nobody, public-domain, not relevant, etc, which
I think are good enough, given that the content of the Copyright field is
free-form.
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi
(and asking you at that time if you would like to summarise the
contents of the Copyright field in files where License indicates
public-domain).
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:41:46 +0100 (CET) x.guim...@free.fr wrote:
The complete text can be found here :
* Original text :
http://www.data.gouv.fr/Licence-Ouverte-Open-Licence
* English translation :
Dear all,
there is an interesting email on the SPDX mailing list, distributing an article
about the BSD and MIT license families. Here is a link to the page with the
attached file.
http://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx/2012-December/000785.html
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Illkirch
for the package as a whole.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114015538.gc5...@falafel.plessy.net
Hello everybody,
for those interested in the subject: SPDX (Software Package Data Exchange,
http://spdx.org) is calling for contributions for their 2.0 version.
Cheers,
-- Charles Plessy, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
- Forwarded message -
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:57:39 +
Subject
unsatisfied in one direction or the
other and telling it repeatedly their opinion on that matter. If you do not
like this, please write a convincing and authoritative explanation of Debian's
opinion, that will close the debate.
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
really feel like an idiot
when I contact upstream to ask them to relicense works, and I am not able to
explain why it matters.
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
.
Also, with such a low threshold for banning people who are polite, precise, who
do not engage into flamewars, and never show aggressivity, we will set the
stage for massive purge and witch-hunting, because of many people are within
the treshold.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi
) Other interested research groups will be redirected
* to the author. The user will not redistribute the code outside
* his immediate research group.
Dear Johannes,
I think that this clause forbids the redistribution by Debian.
Have a nice Sunday,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa
have not studied the other clauses of the ODbL, but section 4.6 therefore
does not seem to make it non-free.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
to be licensed under terms that
may be not welcome Upstream ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
-readability. Currently, the canonical URL
for the standard is
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/.
As for CC0, as Ben explained, it is a license, and the simplest is to list the
copyright holders as for other licenses.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi
...]
Or is there an even better third solution?
Solution 2 is fine; Copyright: [year] John Doe would be enough as well.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
version is *explicitly* discouraged for use
with software.
Hi Thorsten,
Can you share a link to such a recommendation with a reasonable explanation ?
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
, which is included at
Appendix F.”
To me, it appears that Appendix F, which has non-Free clauses, applies.
Have you tried to contact the authors of KANJIDIC ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140604121619.ga21...@falafel.plessy.net
(modulo a small delay) become part of Testing again.
This already has been done for packages such as php-memcached, and could be
done for others.
Thank you for your patience !
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
software, and sell it as “Debian Enhanced”. We and other protect our names,
and PHP does it too. I do not see a problem.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140801231037.ga8...@falafel.plessy.net
Le Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 08:10:49AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
I think that it is important that a few of the ‘some members’ would identify
themselves in support for that request, and explain what they would do if the
worries expressed below turned out to be true.
Sorry for the extra
modification.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140819214405.gb13...@falafel.plessy.net
be better to use the same license as upstream, to simplify
their work.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
://codesearch.debian.net/search?prev=q=the+name+of+Vinay+Sajip
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140826211059
.
Not elegant, but accurate.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
the apparent contradiction at the
pace you want, you can even consider it a wishlist, “patch welcome”
issue only.
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal
the machine-readable
format).
However, it is not canonical, nor automated.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https
be kind to write somewhere in the documentation that Y
is GPL-licensed.
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https
probably ignore the
problem.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150130232546.gc14
, although it would be great
of course if the Subversion authors would manage to elimiate this license from
their sources, because this license is not a good example to follow.
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ
to be indicated in debian/copyright should be GPLv3+.
Have a nice week-end,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org
in the original question, this clause is similar to clause 1 of
the SIL Open Font License 1.1, which is DFSG-Free.
Neither the Font Software nor any of its individual components, in Original
or Modified Versions, may be sold by itself.
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
seperatly.
But a developer doesn't have the freedom to sell the software for
profit to other developers.
On Sat, 30 May 2015 10:46:04 +0900 Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
as suggested in the original question, this clause is similar to clause 1 of
the SIL Open Font
team is that the second sentence solves the problem introduced
by the first.
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https
as the PostScript code"
are not found in any other package; good !
Cheers,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
that the commit messages and the revisions of a file are part the source, since
inspecting them is part of the "preferred" way to modify the file. But we are
not there yet...
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
assed the
screening of the FTP team when it entered our archive. You can also add
Lintian overrides if the Lintian maintainers are uncooperative.
Thanks for your hard work, and have a nice day,
Charles Plessy
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
