[fltk.development] FLTK2.x Styles..

2007-04-02 Thread Greg Ercolano
I'm moving a chunk of the Subject: Re: Styles thread over here from fltk.general that seemed more relevant to fltk.development, to prevent dev chatter on the general group. mal content was trying to get Styles working, and I thought I'd give it a shot just

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Global font size offset

2007-05-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
matthiasm wrote: On May 1, 2007, at 1:30 AM, Greg Ercolano wrote: There's probably some problems with this, eg. increasing the font sizes won't make menubars, buttons, and input prompts thicker to accommodate larger fonts. But in spite of that, it still might be useful..? I have been

Re: [fltk.development] Some testings, please

2007-06-06 Thread Greg Ercolano
gga wrote: Greg Ercolano wrote: OK, found some time this morning to bring up my NT box, and my 2K machine with VS7.0 (haven't seen either of their desktops in a while) and on the 2K machine, tried to build fltk2.0 from svn. This because Rectangle is used without fltk:: in front

Re: [fltk.development] Compiling FLTK

2007-07-05 Thread Greg Ercolano
Chuckk Hubbard wrote: Any idea why the installer might want libfltk.so.1.1, or where I can find it? ..what Maarten de Boer said earlier in this thread: did you configure with --enable-shared ? The libs you have currently are static libs. That only works if your apps

Re: [fltk.development] Form support (HTML 2.0) in HelpDialog/HelpView?

2007-07-20 Thread Greg Ercolano
Joe wrote: Dear Dev team, First of, thanks a bunch on excellent inputs and feedback on this forum! Actually, this Q is a followup to my earlier Q on Gecko; Can anyone confirm that Forms (including radio etc) of HTML 2.0 are not supported by HelpView/HelpDialog of FLTK 2.0? I tried,

Re: [fltk.development] Form support (HTML 2.0) in HelpDialog/HelpView?

2007-07-20 Thread Greg Ercolano
Greg Ercolano wrote: If you want more support from inside your FLTK app, fire off the user's HTML browser as a separate process to open the link in question. There's some code examples somewhere in the newsgroup archive.. can't remember where. Oh right, there's

[fltk.development] [RFE] STR #1758: Add methods to Fl_Menu_ to help dynamically manipulate menus

2007-08-02 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1758 Version: 2.0-feature It would be good if some of the functionalities were added to the Fl_Menu_ class: o Clear all items in a named submenu, eg. int

Re: [fltk.development] freetype+fltk

2007-08-27 Thread Greg Ercolano
flying wrote: about freetype+fltk how to do thank you Questions like this should be in fltk.general. I'll follow up with the answer there, same subject. ___ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com

Re: [fltk.development] Fltk2 FillSlider.cxx missing

2007-10-25 Thread Greg Ercolano
Craig Barnes wrote: I want a filled slider i.e a progress bar, and although there is a FillSlider.h there is no corresponding FillSlider.cxx. Does it need one? Any thoughts or work around suggestions. I think you just #include the file. You don't have to worry about

Re: [fltk.development] Fl_Browser mod for ANSI

2008-03-04 Thread Greg Ercolano
Greg Ercolano wrote: I have a neat little patch to Fl_Browser to support ANSI codes [..] Should I make an STR for 1.x, or just post the patch here? I forgot to ask, should I patch against Ian's utf8 or svn 1.1.x? ___ fltk-dev mailing

Re: [fltk.development] Fl_Browser mod for ANSI

2008-03-07 Thread Greg Ercolano
matthiasm wrote: And even if it ASCII only, I would very much like to take a look at it. While making a test program (and not just using it in my app), I just noticed I need to modify item_width() to properly calculate widths for strings containing ANSI, so I'll need some

[fltk.development] Double posts

2008-03-07 Thread Greg Ercolano
I always wondered what caused the double posts we sometimes see. Apparently it just happened to me.. the cause seemed to be, in my case, hitting 'Reply All' to Matthais' message, and getting two entries in the TO: field: To: Mirror of fltk.development Newsgroup fltk-dev@easysw.com

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #1926: popup menues dont add by their parents x/y

2008-04-22 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1926 Version: 1.3-feature Using the popup code here: http://seriss.com/people/erco/fltk/#PopupMenu ..I can't replicate this either under fedora3. Can't replicate with

Re: [fltk.development] Still won't link in VS2005

2008-06-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
1main.obj : warning LNK4217: locally defined symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED]@@SAHXZ (public: static int __cdecl Fl::run(void)) imported in function _main Just focusing on that one error, sounds like it might be a compiler/linker flag issue, eg. DLL vs Static compile. You showed the

[fltk.development] [OT] iphone sdk

2008-08-17 Thread Greg Ercolano
iPhone SDK development stuff looks kinda cool: http://developer.apple.com/iphone/ You can use your free apple developer's login to download the SDK (free!) and all the how-to videos. Was watching some of the 'getting started' videos. Seems that all the usual unixy stuff is available, including

Re: [fltk.development] unresolved external symbol___WSAFDIsSetreferenced in function public: static void__cdeclFl::add_fd........

2008-08-18 Thread Greg Ercolano
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: error.. unresolved external symbol ___WSAFDIsSet referenced in .. Fl::add_fd(..) error.. unresolved external symbol _select referenced in fl_wait(..) WSAFDIsSet is a M$ symbol, so must come from one of the platform libraries (not from fltk). I

Re: [fltk.development] Re : Design and future - FLTK2

2008-08-24 Thread Greg Ercolano
Brian wrote: Also arguing that replacing char* by std::string and so on would make FLTK2 more bug free is a complete... Using std::string *would* make fltk2 more bug free. But it would be a mistake. Maybe it could be a compile time option to enable std::string() methods.

Re: [fltk.development] Re : Design and future - FLTK2

2008-08-25 Thread Greg Ercolano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just sort of thinking out loud here... I do know that on more than one occasion I've wished it were possible to have more than one label on a widget. Hmm, but wouldn't it be better in such a case to create a custom widget, or just an Fl_Group with

Re: [fltk.development] [Library] r6175 -branches/branch-1.3

2008-08-28 Thread Greg Ercolano
Fabien Costantini wrote: Knowing you mike, there must be a good reason for that statement, but I recognize I don't understand that one. Seeing this I was intrigued, and posted a short 'my 2 cents' in STR 2028. The patch for the $(basename) doesn't fly on an SGI with the

Re: [fltk.development] [Library] r6175 -branches/branch-1.3

2008-08-29 Thread Greg Ercolano
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: According to Ian, it should also work on IRIX platforms and You probably mean Greg here, I think? I haven't seen an Irix machine in years! Yeah, sometimes I turn it on to heat up the room, or to run soundeditor to record stuff off

Re: [fltk.development] [Library] r6175 -branches/branch-1.3

2008-08-29 Thread Greg Ercolano
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Yeah, sometimes I turn it on to heat up the room, or to run soundeditor to record stuff off the radio.. You presumably have to record the radio because you can't hear it over the noise of the fans? Yes, it sounds like a vacuum

[fltk.development] RFE: Fl_Group::resize() additional methods for fltk 1.x

2008-08-30 Thread Greg Ercolano
Looking at the code for Fl_Group::resize(), it tells children to resize before updating its own size. This is a problem if the children's resize() code wants to know what the parent's new size is going to be. Assuming there's a good reason Fl_Group doesn't

Re: [fltk.development] RFE: Fl_Group::resize() additional methods for fltk 1.x

2008-08-31 Thread greg ercolano
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Greg Ercolano wrote: Looking at the code for Fl_Group::resize(), it tells children to resize before updating its own size. This is a problem if the children's resize() code wants to know what the parent's new size is going to be. Assuming

Re: [fltk.development] RFC Should CMake be responsible for msvisualtargets generation

2008-09-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: I'd be willing to take a stab at making a Makefile.WINDOWS for fltk for the MS compilers if that would be entertaining. Brave man! One thing - can you call it Makefile.MS (or similar) please, as I already have windows makefiles, for non

[fltk.development] Using gmake to build FLTK 1.3.x with VS .NET

2008-09-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
Starting a new thread here for building fltk with gmake. I find it just too satisfying to build FLTK on Windows using Microsoft's own compiler *without* the IDE. New tar file that can be extracted tot he fltk 1.3.x directory as: http://seriss.com/people/erco/fltk/tmp/vsnet-makefiles-0.20.tar.gz

Re: [fltk.development] Using gmake to build FLTK 1.3.x with VS .NET

2008-09-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
Tim Channon wrote: Fabien Costantini wrote: I find it just too satisfying to build FLTK on Windows using Microsoft's own compiler *without* the IDE. My 2 cents comments on that: Did you notice how many files are needed to be _added_ to the distrib and in subdirs of the distrib, we already

Re: [fltk.development] Using gmake to build FLTK 1.3.x with VS .NET

2008-09-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
Fabien Costantini wrote: I find it just too satisfying to build FLTK on Windows using Microsoft's own compiler *without* the IDE. My 2 cents comments on that: Did you notice how many files are needed to be _added_ to the distrib A lot less files than the number of project files

Re: [fltk.development] RFC Should CMake be responsible for msvisualtargetsgeneration

2008-09-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
Fabien Costantini wrote: Fabien Costantini wrote: The VS Express compiler flags are very different from the other VS compilers. Are the VS build files smart enough to recognize compiler differences? Could you be more specific ? I meant all the new manifest flags needed

[fltk.development] fluid /SUBSYSTEM question

2008-09-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
I was noticing that (under Windows) when the Visual Studio IDE builds the release version of fltk, fluid.exe is built as a /SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS app. Isn't that a Bad Thing if one tries to use 'fluid -c' from within a Makefile? I'm probably missing something, but being a /subsystem:windows app,

Re: [fltk.development] Using gmake to build FLTK 1.3.x with VS .NET

2008-09-03 Thread Greg Ercolano
I've got the whole kaboodle compiling now under VS NET with gmake; the libs, fluid, test programs. Also have a small 'fltk configration' screen (via 'gmake configure') which prompts for debug/release and verbose/silent build options interactively, or can be overridden by supplying NAME=value on

Re: [fltk.development] Using gmake to build FLTK 1.3.x with VS .NET

2008-09-03 Thread Greg Ercolano
Michael Sweet wrote: It would be interesting to determine whether we can make the exising makefiles work with VC++ with a new makeinclude and config.h header. I think it could. I think my doing a first pass using DOS will show what the porting issues will be.

Re: [fltk.development] Using gmake to build FLTK 1.3.x with VS .NET

2008-09-03 Thread Greg Ercolano
Fabien Costantini wrote: it could make sense to me to try this method and see if the makefiles we currently have could be 'pregenerated' without configure (batch file?) so that win32 users don't have until they install cygwin. Read so that win32 users don't have to run configure they would

Re: [fltk.development] Using gmake to build FLTK 1.3.x with VS .NET

2008-09-03 Thread Greg Ercolano
Here's the latest which builds the whole of FLTK using VS .NET. http://seriss.com/people/erco/fltk/tmp/vsnet-makefiles-0.30.tar.gz Just extract it into a copy of fltk-1.3.x, open a VS .NET console, cd into the dir, and run 'gmake'. It should ask you for DEBUG/RELEASE and

Re: [fltk.development] unicode, utf8, glib, and licensing

2008-09-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
matthiasm wrote: I was very excited yesterday to see the first Japanese characters on my FLTK-for-OSX yesterday and I beleive that we are on a good path. I'd be happy to test your build with my commercial app in Japanese. OSX has been the one platform I haven't yet been able

Re: [fltk.development] utf8 preparation done!

2008-09-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 10.5, it compiles and links fine. Did you update to the latest svn? Yes, I did an 'svn update' followed by 'make distclean; make', but it still built wrong. HOWEVER: I thought the problem might be I had made customizations to one of the Makefiles earlier in

Re: [fltk.development] utf8 preparation done!

2008-09-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
imacarthur wrote: On 11 Sep 2008, at 19:20, Greg Ercolano wrote: On 10.5, it compiles and links fine. Did you update to the latest svn? FWIW, it builds OK on this 10.4.11 mac... Yes, builds fine for me now, too. Hmmm, I just tried it here, and it works out of the box

Re: [fltk.development] utf8 preparation done!

2008-09-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: But hey, I'm impressed! First time I've seen japanese in fltk on the mac. Thanks to Ian's efforts, if I understand that correctly. Well, I did the ATSUI patches, but I'm fairly sure that Greg helped, actually. He maybe doesn't remember it, but I

Re: [fltk.development] utf8 preparation done!

2008-09-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
D'oh. Double post apparently due to Thunderbird's NNTP news reader.. replying to Ian's message seems to have a Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as the NNTP post, causing it to send the message both as an NNTP posting /and/ as an email. Mike, I think I'll post a sugg on news.general regarding

Re: [fltk.development] Comments about the branch1.3-composite

2008-09-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
Michael Sweet wrote: Greg Ercolano wrote: Is 1.3.x supposed to break existing apps? I'd say the goal is to avoid breaking things unnecessarily, but there might be some side-effects of design changes (UTF-8, this Fl_Scroll stuff) which may require small code changes. That said, I

Re: [fltk.development] fltk-1.3, OSX port keyboard handling broken?

2008-09-27 Thread Greg Ercolano
imacarthur wrote: In both cases I svn up to latest, then did a make distclean, followed by ./configure --enable-quartz --enable-threads, then a make. Seems pretty reproducible. Editing the #if 0 block (around line 1290) to #if 1 to restore the previous behaviour has got me up and

[fltk.development] svn update: force conflicts to be overwritten?

2008-10-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
Is there an easy way to do an 'svn update' that *overwrites* all files instead of doing a 'conflict' or 'merge'? ie. more like a tar extraction to write over all the source files with the latest release. The man pages and 'svn help update' don't seem to give an indication. Like many of you, I

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2083: Add maximize, minimize caps to FL_Window

2008-11-04 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2083 Version: 1.3-feature Hmm, one question: why is 'maximized()/minimized()' being suggested instead of 'maximize()/minimize()'? Seems like they should be 'present

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2083: Add maximize, minimize caps to FL_Window

2008-11-05 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2083 Version: 1.3-feature Yes, I'd agree on consistency with what's in FLTK 1.x already when it comes to naming and int return values. It seems the FLTK API seems to

Re: [fltk.development] More UTF-8 handling oddities

2008-11-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
imacarthur wrote: Whilst investigating STR 2080, I tripped over a feature in WinXP (and possibly also in Vista) described in STR 2086. Can I ask others that have access to WinXP and Vista test systems to try the failure recipe I describe and report whether the fault is reproducible or

Re: [fltk.development] FLTK coding standards RFC

2008-11-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
Dejan Lekic wrote: FLTK mostly uses xyz(value) to set, and xyz() to get. And I just _love_ that approach! Seems fine to me. The only way it might get confusing is if xyz is an action verb, like explode, in which case a programmer might accidentally code: //

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #1055: Menu tear-off

2008-11-17 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1055 Version: 2.0-feature Would be great to have this in 1.3.x as well. I've always loved tearoffs.. use em in gimp all the time. Link:

Re: [fltk.development] Fltk-1.3 text extents patch

2008-11-18 Thread Greg Ercolano
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: How do people feel about my fl_text_extents patch (STR #2076)? Offhand I'm not familiar with the difference between a typographical bounding box and a minimal bounding box. It's probably obvious, and I haven't had my coffee yet.

Re: [fltk.development] Fltk-1.3 text extents patch

2008-11-18 Thread Greg Ercolano
imacarthur wrote: On 18 Nov 2008, at 19:00, Torsten Giebl wrote: I would like to have something like this but one that accepts a String and gives back the minimum width and - height. Torsten, can you expand on this? I am not sure I understand what you are asking - is this not what my

Re: [fltk.development] fltk2 Debian package

2008-11-26 Thread Greg Ercolano
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Not official answers, just my opinion... as you can see at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364295 I'm working on a Debian package for fltk2 (needed by dillo etc...), however I've few questions for you: - are ABI/API stable?

[fltk.development] Downloads page -- maybe should have dates on the releases

2008-11-27 Thread Greg Ercolano
I think some folks might be downloading eg. 1.0.x instead of 1.1.x because at a quick glance, eg. 1.0.11 might seem like it's newer than 1.1.9 I think if dates were included on the Downloads page next to the releases, this could be avoided. ___ fltk-dev

Re: [fltk.development] Downloads page -- maybe should have dates on the releases

2008-11-27 Thread Greg Ercolano
Michael Sweet wrote: Greg Ercolano wrote: I think some folks might be downloading eg. 1.0.x instead of 1.1.x because at a quick glance, eg. 1.0.11 might seem like it's newer than 1.1.9 I think if dates were included on the Downloads page next to the releases, this could be avoided. Maybe

Re: [fltk.development] Fltk-1.3 text extents patch

2008-11-30 Thread Greg Ercolano
imacarthur wrote: how did I get it to compile on my non-XFT test setup? I need to go back over that build and see what I actually did compile. I was wondering that myself.. I just now compiled that same snapshot on my more recent fedora3 machine with xft disabled

[fltk.development] fltk-1.3.x-svn questions

2008-11-30 Thread Greg Ercolano
Some questions about fltk-1.3.x-svn 1) Which Microsoft compiler(s) are currently supported to build fltk-1.3.x (while its in dev), and what is the correct master project file to load? I've noticed visualc/fltk.dsw no longer exists (which is what README

Re: [fltk.development] fltk-1.3.x-svn questions

2008-12-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
Thanks Fabien. One of the reasons I asked about the MS compiler was I've been putting together a Makefile kit (for building fltk from the command line with VS 7.0 .NET, something I need for my own purposes) I usually refer to the fltk VS build log to

Re: [fltk.development] fltk-1.3.x-svn questions

2008-12-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
Fabien Costantini wrote: Since the beginning you started this work, I have the feeling it could be a great alternative to the ide vs project files, provided that some more (probably tricky) work is achieved. More precisely, it would be great to reuse the existing Makefiles, and use a

Re: [fltk.development] Loading GIF Images from memory buffer

2008-12-03 Thread Greg Ercolano
Gena Svarovski wrote: Greetings! Not sure if this is correct place for such posting but I didn't find any better, so writing here. I found it useful to keep small GIF images like icons not in external files which are shipped together with application but as static arrays inside

[fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2102: RFE: new FL_ALIGN flags

2008-12-07 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2102 Version: 1.3-feature FL_ALIGN seems to have some limitations that prevents certain positions for labels that would should be possible. The following diagram shows

Re: [fltk.development] Inclusion of PDF file in SVN repo

2008-12-08 Thread Greg Ercolano
imacarthur wrote: Gents, Is it intended that the fltk.pdf file be included in the svn repo? I wondered, only because it is quite large and that might be a problem for some users on slow links? Ya, I was wondering that myself. I thought my svn update was freezing up, and

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE]STR#2076:Patchforfl_text_extentsmechanism in fltk-1.3.x

2008-12-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
Fabien Costantini wrote: Yes I'm afraid I do, look at the diff file below needed for fixing current svn ... - if (c) return fl_text_extents(c, strlen(c), dx, dy, w, h); [..] + if (c) fl_text_extents(c, strlen(c), dx, dy, w, h); Interesting.. if I gather the gist of the patch

[fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2113: Fl_Browser: some necessary methods (for derived classes)

2008-12-25 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2113 Version: 1.3-feature Fl_Browser is missing a few needed methods for derived classes to work efficiently with the linked list of items. These appear to be omissions:

[fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2127: Fl_Help_Viewer: an easy way to implement http: urls

2009-01-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2127 Version: 1.3-feature It occurs to me that it would be easy to get Fl_Help_Viewer to support http: links, probably with a single line of code, and *without* any TCP

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2127: Fl_Help_Viewer: an easy way to implement http: urls

2009-01-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2127 Version: 1.3-feature Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2127 Version: 1.3-feature--- Fl_Help_View.cxx.old2008-12-14 21:47:12.0 -0800 +++

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2127: Fl_Help_Viewer: an easy way to implement http: urls

2009-01-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2127 Version: 1.3-feature See attached patch for one way to do it. Cool, web links now work in my FLTK help pages..! Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2127 Version:

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2127: Fl_Help_Viewer: an easy way to implement http: urls

2009-01-20 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2127 Version: 1.3-feature Yes, I've been playing around with it a bit, will have a different patch after I do some more testing.. Link:

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2127: Fl_Help_Viewer: an easy way to implement http: urls

2009-01-20 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2127 Version: 1.3-feature Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2127 Version: 1.3-feature--- Fl_Help_View.cxx2009-01-20 10:53:25.0 -0800 +++

[fltk.development] svn 1.3.x r6642: test/help program coredumping on start (fedora3)

2009-01-20 Thread Greg Ercolano
Seems the test/help program segfaults under linux (fedora3) with the current clean checkout of 1.3.x (r6642) and default build. (Works fine on the mac, though) Also, the test/help program no longer shows an example html page anymore, probably because it

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2127: Fl_Help_Viewer: an easy way to implement http: urls

2009-01-20 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2127 Version: 1.3-feature OK, the attached patch: Fl_Help_View.cxx-patch3 ..should do more of the right thing, specifically: o Does not clear the screen when

[fltk.development] fl_xxx() functions: hard to find in the doxygen docs?

2009-02-02 Thread Greg Ercolano
On the new docs page: http://fltk.org/doc-1.3/index.html I see the old docs are on the RHS, and the doxygen docs are on the LHS. I'm curious where to find the complete alphabetical list of all the fl_xxx() functions on the doxygen side? (I know they are under 'Functions' on the old docs page) I

Re: [fltk.development] fl_xxx() functions: hard to find in thedoxygen docs?

2009-02-02 Thread Greg Ercolano
imacarthur wrote: Actually, I just (yesterday) checked out 1.3 on a clean win32/mingw box and was surprised that the help-view demo failed when I was running through the test folder. Yes, like you, I think I brought this up on fltk.dev a few weeks ago:

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2140: Russian and chinese fonts on FLTK 1.1.8

2009-02-05 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2140 Version: 1.3-feature This is a feature request for 1.3.x which already supports UTF8 (Chinese/Russian/etc), so someone's probably going to close this. Strongly

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #749: Enable a right-click copy/paste menu for all Input/Output/Editor/Display widgets

2009-02-05 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L749 Version: 1.4-feature FWIW, here's an example of how to implement the copy/paste menu. Or at least, one of probably many ways:

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2148: Use iconv() if provided by glibc

2009-02-09 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2148 Version: 1.3-feature Does this take into account compiling on Windows with Visual Studio? I know one can get and compile iconv for windows, but it's sure nice not

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2076: Patchforfl_text_extentsmechanismin fltk-1.3.x

2009-02-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Indeed, the test program attached to the STR might even be added to the test folder, if we wanted to go that far? +1 from me for the program in the test folder. Probably such a program could test multiple fltk functions, so that we don't set a

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR#2076:Patchforfl_text_extentsmechanismin fltk-1.3.x

2009-02-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
matthiasm wrote: When I ported FLTK to the Mac, I started exactly that. The source code is still in test/unittest.cxx. The goal was to be able to verify rendering on every available platform. I wanted to render markers first and then overwrite them with whatever drawing function I was

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE]STR#2076:Patchforfl_text_extentsmechanismin fltk-1.3.x

2009-02-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: I think the browser idea might be a bit clearer and easier to navigate, so that it's always clear what all the tests are by name, and both keyboard or mouse could navigate the tests consistently. (The browser would simply remain

[fltk.development] New unittest app suggestion -- RFC

2009-02-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
I think the browser idea might be a bit clearer and easier to navigate, so that it's always clear what all the tests are by name, and both keyboard or mouse could navigate the tests consistently. (The browser would simply remain up while one cycles through the tests.)

Re: [fltk.development] New unittest app suggestion -- RFC

2009-02-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
matthiasm wrote: No, you guys are correct. Very nice, thank you! Fixed; changed touched - overwritten. Ian, also added a few more extents tests mainly out of curiosity.. I wanted to see what `, -, and _ looked like, as well as some separate text with

Re: [fltk.development] FLTK for S60

2009-02-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
matthiasm wrote: On 13.02.2009, at 15:18, SA wrote: http://blog-sadysty.ath.cx/?action=articlea=38 Oi, very nice! Hey, if that's fltk1.3, try adding Fl::scheme(gtk+); to the top of your app..! ;) ___ fltk-dev mailing list

[fltk.development] Fl_Browser: new FL_SORT_ASC/DESC

2009-03-05 Thread Greg Ercolano
I noticed these two new defines in Fl_Browser_.H for 1.3.0: #define FL_SORT_ASC0 /** sort browser items in ascending alphabetic order. */ #define FL_SORT_DESC 1 /** sort in descending order */ Before these become 'written in stone' when fltk.1.3.x

[fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2169: OSX: Cursor movement in Fl_Text_Editor, Fl_Input

2009-03-06 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2169 Version: 1.3-feature [OSX 10.4.x on iBook] In Safari, Firefox, and TextEdit: CLOVERLEAF-LEFT move cursor to beginning of line, CLOVERLEAF-RIGHT move cursor to end

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2169: OSX: Cursor movement in Fl_Text_Editor, Fl_Input

2009-03-06 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2169 Version: 1.3-feature Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2169 Version: 1.3-feature--- src/Fl_Text_Editor.cxx.orig 2009-03-06 07:16:07.0 -0800 +++

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2169: OSX: Cursor movement in Fl_Text_Editor, Fl_Input

2009-03-06 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2169 Version: 1.3-feature text-editor.patch [attached] against 1.3.x should implement the 8 accelerators described above under OSX: Meta Up/Dn/Lt/Rt -- moves

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2169: OSX: Cursor movement in Fl_Text_Editor, Fl_Input

2009-03-06 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2169 Version: 1.3-feature Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2169 Version: 1.3-feature--- src/Fl_Input.cxx.orig 2009-03-06 07:44:18.0 -0800 +++

Re: [fltk.development] Fl_Browser: new FL_SORT_ASC/DESC

2009-03-09 Thread Greg Ercolano
Before these become 'written in stone' when fltk.1.3.x releases, can they be changed to something more readable, like: FL_SORT_ASCEND FL_SORT_DESCEND I think that does sound better. +1 IMHO, FL_SORT_ASCENDING and FL_SORT_DESCENDING would be even better. Agreed, even

Re: [fltk.development] fltk.pdf: to commit or not to commit?

2009-03-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
Mike (or someone), can you add me to svn? Duncan, if you want, I can join the dox effort. Maybe even fix a few simple bugs. If you're still in the initial stages of working out the dox style, I can hold off, or avoid certain parts you're still

Re: [fltk.development] Folding out doxygen comments in vi

2009-03-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
I had good luck getting vim to do this trick of collapsing dox comments.. Here's a little video to go with it (no sound): http://seriss.com/people/erco/fltk/vim-doxygen-folding/vim-doxygen-folding.htm I never knew about 'folding' in vi.. certainly is a neat feature.

Re: [fltk.development] fltk.pdf: to commit or not to commit?

2009-03-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Personally I don't have problems with comments in the sources. Sometimes I'd like much more comments in the code (not only doxygen, but also some hints what the code is good for). Yes, I agree. Though I sure do like being able to turn off the end

Re: [fltk.development] fltk.pdf: to commit or not to commit?

2009-03-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
Fabien Costantini wrote: Mike (or someone), can you add me to svn? If it's not done already, just fill the application form on the website, I'm sure you'll get an answer rapidly ;-) Ah, thanks -- didn't know that was there. I see there's a Request Developer Status under

Re: [fltk.development] fltk.pdf: to commit or not to commit?

2009-03-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
As you have already noticed, there are a lot of places where there are comments that still hark back to the time when a single comment covered two or more forms of a function, or multiple functions that all appeared together. Now doxygen splits these functions apart, and the comment no

[fltk.development] Doxygen commenting in fltk

2009-03-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
At first I tried using grouping.. this is supposed to work according to doxygen chapter 5.2 on Member Groups: /*...@{*/ /** Sets/gets the sortorder, used for sorting the tree items. */ void sortorder(Fl_Tree_Sort val) { _sortorder = val; } FL_Tree_Sort sortorder() const {

Re: [fltk.development] fltk.pdf: to commit or not to commit?

2009-03-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
Greg Ercolano wrote: Strictly speaking not a doxygem problem, but at the source level there are a lot of places where function/method signatures are not specified in a consistent way, with (int,int,int) for example, or with different parameter names in different places. We should address

Re: [fltk.development] fltk.pdf: to commit or not to commit?

2009-03-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
Duncan Gibson wrote: It my mind the problem here isn't long or short names, but consistency. Imagine that the declaration in the *.H has parameters with long names, but the definition in the *.cxx file has short or missing names, and you have to write the doxygen comments in the *.cxx file. It

Re: [fltk.development] fltk.pdf: to commit or not to commit?

2009-03-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
Greg Ercolano wrote: Note: doxygen will warn us if \param[in] xxx is used in dox, but doesn't match the parameters in the prototype. So if we use \param[in], that will catch that kind of problem. Of interest: \p xxx does NOT do checking. Maybe \p should

[fltk.development] old C vs C++

2009-03-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
Hmm, in trying to fix STR#2174 (SGI fails to compile 1.3.x), most of the problem is to do with C++ style comments in old C file contexts; SGI's native C compiler is strict about not groking C++ comment style by default. Apparently doxygenification and utf8 brought this on. caused some of this.

Re: [fltk.development] old C vs C++

2009-03-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: 2) Convert the few C++ style comments to C style. This won't be hard, as there aren't too many. I've already done this, and can check it in if need be. +1 for #2: If there is one compiler that doesn't like this, there may be more. Fixing this in

[fltk.development] utf8 files -- code standards compliance

2009-03-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
The source code in the utf8 dir is all nutty with non-4 space code indents. Thought I'd bring all that into compliance.. any reasons not to? ___ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Re: [fltk.development] #warning excludes [was: [fltk.bugs] [MOD] STR #2174: ... buildfailure on SGI ]

2009-03-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: #if !defined(WIN32) !defined(sgi) || defined(CYGWIN) #warning FIXME This needs to be UTF aware now #endif I don't think that this is correct, for two reasons: (1) WIN32 is also defined when compiling with gcc under Windows. If we want to exclude the

Re: [fltk.development] #warning excludes [was: [fltk.bugs] [MOD] STR #2174: ... buildfailureon SGI ]

2009-03-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
Seems maybe Fabien's the one to ask about the original line; (boning up on my svn skillz): 6235 fabien #if !defined(WIN32) || defined(CYGWIN) 6235 fabien #warning FIXME This needs to be UTF aware now 6235 fabien #endif Fabien, if your watching, does the

[fltk.development] Doxygen commenting in fltk

2009-03-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
Greg Ercolano wrote: Greg Ercolano wrote: I'd also be happy to start or assist in the creation of an FLTK doxygen standards page that describes how docs should appear, so that new docs follow a certain format. Great; I'll see if I can give it a start. BTW, looks like

Re: [fltk.development] Doxygen commenting in fltk

2009-03-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
Greg Ercolano wrote: As a start, I've created a new doc, copying in the doxygen part of the FLTK coding standards, and will add some stuff from this thread, as well as some other notes from the last few days. I've 'published' the doc so that it should be publicly viewable

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >