://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed
cost
the average person. My power and energy bills have become unbearable.
Medical cost, prohibitive. Food e.g. bacon almost tripled in price
since 2008.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:53 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 April 2014 14:02, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote
...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
- for example water
quality, rates of mutation, sperm count, disease and parasite statistics
and many other metrics I have missed.
Chris
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
*Sent:* Sunday, April 06, 2014 10:18 AM
and many other metrics I have missed.
Chris
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
*Sent:* Sunday, April 06, 2014 10:18 AM
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Climate models
Dear Friends
...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 April 2014 05:18, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear Friends,
Is there a single objective definition of damage to the environment?
Given the complexity of the environment, I very much doubt it. There are
some proxies for it, of course, e.g. rate
Hi Liz,
Why is there no interest in developing tech to get us off the planet? Why
is there a retreat into a bunker mentality?
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:03 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 April 2014 12:45, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Hi Chris,
Given
This article is packed full of falsehoods that a simple bit of research
could correct.
read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shale
As to its main point, all predictions are based on models. Models are never
the real thing. Duh! So some expert has a wrong model. Big News! LOL.
What is the point
All of those different versions of you have slightly different quantum
states, or else they would be exactly this you and not a different
version. There is no contradiction.
On Monday, March 24, 2014 5:55:47 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
According to MWI I am not unique for there are many versions
...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public
be
recoverable What have you been reading?
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
*Sent:* Friday, April 04, 2014 3:33 PM
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Climate models
Hey Chris
:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
Here is the thing. You are complete discounting future technological
advancements in your analysis. 50 years ago, no one considered shale to be
a source ore for hydrocarbons. Soon enough we will be syphoning hydrogen
off Jupiter. Why
at 9:25 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
Here is the thing. You are complete discounting future technological
advancements in your analysis. 50 years ago
:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
Here is the thing. You are complete discounting future technological
advancements in your analysis. 50 years ago, no one considered shale to be
a source ore for hydrocarbons. Soon
maybe someday with some technology will it all
may be recoverable What have you been reading?
*From:*everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.comeverything-list@googlegroups.com]
*On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul
King *Sent:* Friday, April 04, 2014 3:33 PM
ones that I built for myself. The data is hard to get...
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
are betting the destiny
This data is interesting:
http://www.indeed.com/salary/Green-Growth-Ventures-LLC.html
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
are betting the destiny of planet earth that these hypothetical future
technologies will become realized in time
Dear Russel and Kim,
I remember fondly when the translation of Bruno's thesis was being
discussed. I am very happy to see the results of your hard work. Thank you
for doing this! I will be buying a copy of it asap. :-)
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 1:43:05 AM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote:
Hi
forms of reprogramming, or reconfiguring, the propagation of
information for multipartite statistics and in quantum field theory.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from
:26, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear LizR,
You and Bruno have often complained that my postings lack rigor... For a
nice formal representation of Heraclitean streams click
herehttp://books.google.com/books?id=vurIJEFut8QCpg=PA55lpg=PA55dq=jon+barwise+streams+hypersetssource=blots=eYJKhMJR1
...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 27 Jan 2014, at 01:36, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Like I have written previously, I am past the point of buying the idea
that there is a Reality out there independent of us that we passively come
to experience. I am tired of explanations that ask us to believe that
change
, a nice alternative to the block universe concept.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity
.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe
Also see:
http://files.meetup.com/1819750/%2313%20-%20Ian%20Stewart%20-%20Figments%20of%20Reality.pdf
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Folks,
I agree with John's most resent remark and his recommendation of the
books. Here
,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public
=ensa=Xei=Y4rlUu2tCIW-sQSf74HYBwved=0CGMQ6AEwBw#v=onepageq=jon%20barwise%20streams%20hypersetsf=false
and
read the bit about hypersets. BTW, this is a concept almost identical to
what Lou Kauffman uses in his notion of eigenforms.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe
, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Folks,
I agree with John's most resent remark and his recommendation of the
books. Here is a nice review of Collapse of Chaos:
http://www.thenewhumanities.net/books/Book%20Reviews44.html
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014
out that there is no a priori order of the
holes, it is a subjective delusion that we obtain because of our inability
to see the whole lot.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:08 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 January 2014 11:20, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
'Because
Dear LizR,
Keep going! Don't stop there, hear out the fellow's definition and think
about it.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:42 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 January 2014 11:26, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
You and Bruno have often complained
passively come
to experience. I am tired of explanations that ask us to believe that
change is an illusion that somehow persists.
Can we try a different set of concepts?
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 7:28 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 January 2014 12:48, Stephen Paul King stephe
, Jan 26, 2014 at 7:31 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 January 2014 12:49, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
Keep going! Don't stop there, hear out the fellow's definition and
think about it.
It's far too complicated for my little brain. You must have
Dear LizR,
I will let Kevin Knuth answer for me:
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1831
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 8:33 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 January 2014 13:36, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
Very good points that you make
that the
current present moment will disappear and be replaced with a new future
moment?
The idea that time flows, when followed to its logical ends, seems to
undermine the very reasons for assuming it in the first place.
Jason
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe
present moment will disappear and be replaced with a new future
moment?
The idea that time flows, when followed to its logical ends, seems to
undermine the very reasons for assuming it in the first place.
Jason
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com
Dear Jason,
As many as are possible.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Jason,
I would not say that only a single present moment of time exists.
I
,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public
no one was dumb enough to ever take seriously.
But people actually do, very smart people too!
Edgar
On Friday, January 24, 2014 7:58:06 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
One has to be willing to face the flames, sometimes literally, when
promoting a new idea. I do
2014 08:54, Stephen Paul King step...@provensecure.comwrote:
Either way the concept of a block universe is one of the most mind
blowingly moronic ideas anyone ever came up with. It reminds me of the
ideas me and my buddies used to come up with in Jr. High School just for
laughs but which no one
is a
dimension (which is mathematically valid of course), otherwise it is not.
See my explanation with details above...
Edgar
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 3:55:21 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
Strictly speaking, no, time is not a dimension. We define sequences
figment of our imagination, IMHO.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:12 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 January 2014 09:53, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
We now know, given the weight of evidence in support of QM, that
Newtonian physics is wrong, even thought it can
of Bell's theorem. My main argument
is that our explanatory models must start with experimental facts, not
myths wrapped in fancy math.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:03 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 January 2014 09:53, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
Umm, I
Dear LizR,
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:08 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 January 2014 11:25, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear Russell,
I agree, this has been pointed out by many. The Schroedinger's
equation uses the classical concept of time. The Wheeler
2014 15:22, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:08 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 January 2014 11:25, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear Russell,
I agree, this has been pointed out by many
Dear LizR,
I try to (have some idea what I am talking about). I just have lost the
desire to explain myself. I made my case already.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:24 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 January 2014 15:43, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
I have
email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http
Dear Bruno,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Jan 2014, at 23:16, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 1:11:16 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Jan 2014, at 15:45, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It is a phisical
/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use
in our minds rather than 'out there' in the
universe
I agree!
Edgar
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 5:09:03 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
Cool! We are making progress in understanding each other. :-) Let me
get into some details, where the devil is!
On Tue, Jan
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear John,
Thank you for trying to parse my gobbletygok! Watch the Donald Hoffman
talk, then think about what your saying.
http://youtu.be/dqDP34a-epI
Are you following my argument that we need a dual
...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 January 2014 17:51, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
Did the notion of an Eigenform, as defined, make sense to you?
I just had another look. It appears to be an infinite nest of boxes... I
am probably missing something but I can't see
to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior
, it starts with
the Void.
You are thinking of the idea almost exactly backwards. :-)
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:10 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 January 2014 14:01, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
The infinite nesting of boxes is one of the possible
2014 14:29, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
I do not see how what is by definition fixed and timeless can be
considered to have any property that is an actual
actionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_(physics)
.
Following the supplied link gives this definition
Dear LizR,
I don't know how I could explain it any better Sorry. :_(
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:43 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 January 2014 14:32, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
The nested or tower of boxes are the result, the product
Dear LizR,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:04 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 January 2014 14:55, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
I argue against the block universe idea as well using quantum
mechanics: positions and momenta cannot co-exist as definite
Dear LizR,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:24 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 January 2014 15:28, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:04 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 January 2014 14:55, Stephen Paul King
stephe
Dear LizR,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:40 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 January 2014 17:35, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
Yes, there are many ontological assumptions. Could you list a few that
seem obvious to you? It is not easy to cut and paste
Dear LizR,
There is also some kind of continuity relation between the content of
the pigeon holes...
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:45 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 January 2014 15:40, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
OK, Let us stipulate
Dear Alberto,
I disagree, but like the direction of your thinking.
On Monday, January 20, 2014 3:17:16 PM UTC-5, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
Computation is understood as whatever made by a digital computer or
something that can be emulated (or aproximated) by a digital computer.
So
Dear LizR,
On Monday, January 20, 2014 10:04:38 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
A process which transforms information?
Any! Define information as the distinction between a pair of things that
makes a difference to a third. The third is the witness, it gives us a
notion of 3p...
Ultimately,
Dear yanniru,
It is deterministic in the mathematical sense if determinism is some form
of bijective map between a domain and a range. But we cannot access the
content of the domain nor of the range. Laplace's Demon can't read it off.
Resent debate on the topic of the Black Hole Firewall
Dear Bruno,
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 8:51:14 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 20 Jan 2014, at 21:17, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Computation is understood as whatever made by a digital computer or
something that can be emulated (or aproximated) by a digital computer.
OK. That's a
Dear Alberto,
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:44:18 AM UTC-5, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
Liz, Richard:
I´m not talking about global reduction of entropy neither of the
universe neither a star, planet of black hole, but a local decrease of
entropy at the cost of a (bigger) increase of entropy
://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only
Dear Bruno,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Jan 2014, at 20:05, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 8:51:14 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 20 Jan 2014, at 21:17, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Computation
Dear Bruno,
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 1:11:16 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Jan 2014, at 15:45, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It is a phisical definition of computation in the physical world, to
distinguish what physical phenomena are computations and what are not.
I don´t care
Dear Craig,
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 9:19:54 AM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:08:45 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 22 January 2014 15:04, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
Computation is the nested, recursive enumeration of uniform symbolic
bodies.
Dear Craig,
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:54:19 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:59:50 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Hey Craig!
I watched the video... very cool!
Hi Dan, glad you liked it.
Questions:
1) Who is the user of the interface?
...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:26:15 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Craig,
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:54:19 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:59:50 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Hey Craig!
I watched the video... very
Dear LizR,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:02 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 January 2014 02:22, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:40 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 January 2014 17:35, Stephen Paul King
stephe
@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us
to process the data...
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:39 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 January 2014 12:25, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
And the logical process, at least, re-presents the physical process. We
get a closed loop if we have full algebraic closure
Dear LizR,
Yes, we are but one that does not live in an imaginary timeless realm.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:12 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 January 2014 18:42, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
(Isn't that a bit like saying that me typing I just
Dear LizR,
I want to explore the idea that Realities Evolve.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:36 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 January 2014 19:34, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
Yes, we are but one that does not live in an imaginary timeless realm
.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information
@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us
and toes, for example.
Edgar
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 1:50:03 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
We can get to the root of the obstruction, perhaps, is the nature of
perception. If perception, physically speaking, is the mere matching
between some bit of the world to some
, separable and distributed computations and logics that do
not force ACID http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACID absolutely are a
solution.
Edgar
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 2:05:38 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Edgar L. Owen edga...@att.net
in the
mind of some observer. It's the way the information is modeled or simulated
by a mind.
Edgar
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 2:05:38 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Edgar L. Owen edga...@att.net wrote:
Stephen,
It's an error to assume
wrote:
On 21 January 2014 17:51, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
Did the notion of an Eigenform, as defined, make sense to you?
Heinz performs the magic trick of convincing us that the familiar objects
of our
existence can be seen to be nothing more than tokens
+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
, then presumably the posts shouldn't show up in my email. :)
-Gabe
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Gage,
Are you attempting to view the Google group from a Google+ or Gmail
environment?
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Gabe Bodeen gabebod
computational reality
which includes myriads of ongoing computations which together continually
compute the current state of the universe?
Yes. It is the evolution of the wavefunctions of the physical systems.
Edgar
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 5:17:44 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote
Dear LizR,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:06 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 January 2014 11:38, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
Plain English explanations are the problem: they carry a set of
ontological assumptions built it. Kauffman is challenging
...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 January 2014 08:49, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear Bruno,
The idea that I am pursuing here is how to think of Becoming in a way
that is consistent with comp. So far all we have are eternal static
infinite entities.
Pigeon holes ... yes
, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:06 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 January 2014 11:38, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
Plain English explanations are the problem: they carry a set
, at 21:01, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Thank you for writing this remark! It is very helpful.
You are welcome.
I could see where there could be some debate on the constructability
claim, as the set of all programs in L could be infinite and thus
the lexicographic ordering would
Dear Bruno,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 19 Jan 2014, at 21:09, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014, at 22:52, Stephen Paul King wrote:
I will write
Dear Bruno,
Is it possible for a Computation to be a Model also? What is the
obstruction?
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 20 Jan 2014, at 07:27, Stephen Paul King wrote:
No! This is not unknown. I am cobbling ideas together, sure, think about
.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non
.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information
Dear LizR,
If you have a chance, scan through this paper. Its ideas follow the same
basic ontology of Becoming as mine. (My thinking is far less formal and
even crackpotish in comparison.)
http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/Eigen.pdf
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Stephen Paul King
@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us
11:08, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
If you have a chance, scan through this paper. Its ideas follow the
same basic ontology of Becoming as mine. (My thinking is far less formal
and even crackpotish in comparison.)
http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~kauffman
to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior
.
My interest now is in the computational Word Problem. I have more
homework to do.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Stephen, Liz,
On 18 Jan 2014, at 00:02, LizR wrote:
On 18 January 2014 11:39, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear
Dear Bruno,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014, at 22:52, Stephen Paul King wrote:
I will write it again. Block Universes are an incoherent idea. It only
seems to work because we imagine tem as existing out there and subject to
our
://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed
101 - 200 of 937 matches
Mail list logo
