this be implemented practically? Are the HCP protocols / pipelines
you mentioned later available for the research community?
Many thanks in advance,
Luke
Matt Glasser
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduq=from:
%22Matt+Glasser%22 Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:09:44 -0800
http
This is available online now:
http://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S1053811913005053
On 5/7/13 3:10 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
actually Matt Glasser points out that a brief description is in his paper
that is coming out soon, and there is also some description
a lot of SNR at the high spatial frequencies, seems a shame
to go to 0.7mm and then do that.
Cheers,
Souheil
On May 12, 2013, at 10:54 PM, Matt Glasser m...@ma-tea.com wrote:
This is available online now:
http://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S1053811913005053
On 5/7/13 3:10 PM, Bruce
Matt Glasser m...@ma-tea.com:
Is the brain extraction removing that part of the brain? Do you
know
where the OFC ends and olfactory bulb begins?
Peace,
Matt.
On 5/16/13 11:43 AM, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik
cschwie...@mail.rockefeller.edu wrote:
Hi!
I am failing to get a proper pial surface
using -p, mri_segment
reads in the threshold as the input volume.
I tried specifying the input with -i (as explained here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg18826.
html),
but now it does not recognize the -i flag.
Caspar
2013/5/17 Matt Glasser m...@ma-tea.com
. But apparently the WashU people has something that does just
that
for you. I think the best person to contact about the details is Matt
Glasser.
J
On 2 Sep 2013, at 15:58, Saad Jbabdi s...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk
wrote:
Hi In Probtrackx, this is done internally.
If you just want to transform
Note that this does not apply to HCP-style FreeSurfer runs or the HCP
released data.
Peace,
Matt.
On 9/7/13 8:26 AM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Anupa
it means that for some acquisition types the pial surfaces in 5.2 had
substantial errors. We recommend rerunning with
Also, what kind of T2w sequence is this? I think we've mostly tested it
with the T2-SPACE (unless Bruce has tested with other things).
Peace,
Matt.
On 9/27/13 12:58 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Michael
that looks pretty bad! What is the resolution of the T2? The T1
, Matt Glasser wrote:
Also, what kind of T2w sequence is this? I think we've mostly tested it
with the T2-SPACE (unless Bruce has tested with other things).
Peace,
Matt.
On 9/27/13 12:58 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Michael
that looks pretty bad! What
, is
it possible for the user to modify the nsigma_above and -nsigma_below flags
for mris_make_surfaces when using -T2pial?
Peace,
Matt.
From: Michael Waskom mwas...@stanford.edu
Date: Friday, September 27, 2013 2:20 PM
To: Matt Glasser m...@ma-tea.com
Cc: Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:06 PM
To: Matt Glasser m...@ma-tea.com
Cc: Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu,
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Major problems with T2-based pial removal
Hmm, Ok. Thanks Matt.
I still think it's
I think the latest version of FSL has this sorted out (it doesn't change
your machine's POSIXLY_CORRECT setting except briefly in the middle of
fsl_sub).
Peace,
Matt.
From: chenchunhuichina chenchunhuich...@gmail.com
Date: Friday, November 1, 2013 2:55 AM
To: Matt Glasser m...@ma-tea.com
Cc
To fix the second problem, why not reorient the T2w image so the image axes
are oriented in the way that FreeSurfer expects?
Peace,
Matt.
From: Martijn Steenwijk martijnsteenw...@gmail.com
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2013 8:13 AM
To: freesurfer freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Cc: Veronica
I think you can do it with mri_convert rl. I don't think it makes sense to
expect FLIRT to get the registration right reliably if the axes are off (in
the HCP Pipelines we definitely don't expect this and make sure all images
are RPI before processing them).
Peace,
Matt.
From: Martijn
Higher than 1mm resolution helps a lot. We use 0.7mm isotropic in the HCP.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Megha K. megha...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, December 9, 2013 10:23 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: [Freesurfer] Occipital cortex segmentation
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am using freesurfer
Newer versions also have the ability to run some stages on multiple CPU
cores (with the -openmp cores flag) which speeds certain stages (e.g. in
autorecon2) up considerably. I'm also sure Bruce wouldn't turn down more
resources to hire the programmers needed to make it faster either!
Peace,
Some pictures would probably be helpful to know what the issue is.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Christine Smith cnsm...@ucsd.edu
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:05 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: [Freesurfer] poor grey/white distinction in superior part of scan
Hello,
I am
From: Christine Smith cnsm...@ucsd.edu
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 3:58 PM
To: Matt Glasser m...@ma-tea.com
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] poor grey/white distinction in superior part of
scan
Please note that the left and right sides of the brain are flipped for
freesurfer vs the dicom
If you are compiling with clang openmp might not work.
Peace,
Matt.
On 5/2/14, 2:13 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Lukas
sorry, I'm out of my depth on the mac. Perhaps Zeke knows what's going
on?
Does OpenMP have to be enabled somehow?
Bruce
On Fri, 2 May 2014,
Hi Bruce,
For whatever reason, sometimes the T2w surface adjustment will be way off.
Adjusting the -nsigma_above # -nsigma_below # even a little bit up and
down can get it out of the minimum and make it work, so there might be a
bug.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Emil H.J. Nijhuis
Probably Emil¹s current example would be best because it is failing in
your recon-all setup.
Matt.
On 5/9/14, 9:31 AM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Matt
if you can send me an example I'll try to find time to take a look
Bruce
On Fri, 9
May 2014, Matt Glasser wrote:
Hi
send me an example I'll try to find time to take a look
Bruce
On Fri, 9
May 2014, Matt Glasser wrote:
Hi Bruce,
For whatever reason, sometimes the T2w surface adjustment will be way
off.
Adjusting the -nsigma_above # -nsigma_below # even a little bit
up
and
down can get it out
Yes the HCP pipelines have to take care of this as well so that the
surfaces and volume align outside of FreeSurfer.
Peace,
Matt.
On 5/27/14, 8:35 AM, Franz Liem f.l...@psychologie.uzh.ch wrote:
Hi Michael,
I had a similar problem a while ago. Maybe this might help.
It probably thinks the STL file is just a mesh without coloring.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Mat yuki matsuyuki2...@outlook.jp
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 7:19 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Bruce has said the FLAIR might be a little better for FreeSurfer but it¹s
worse for myelin maps (has less CNR for the myelin, though you can still see
the major areas). Currently, the T2 and FLAIR flags do exactly the same
thing, so it doesn¹t even matter what flag you use. I think it depends on
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] T2-space vs T2-space-FLAIR
thanks matt,
would like to be sure that your comments in relation to the T2-space-flair
sequence and not the typical clinical TSE-FLAIR. is that the case?
cheers,
satra
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Matt
Hi Bruce,
He just needs the grey matter part of a typical ribbon.mgz volume. He lost
some of his recon-all folder.
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
Sent: Sunday,
What are the units of that measure?
Thanks,
Matt.
_
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas Greve
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 9:25 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] (no
Are you using a 32-channel coil? It looks like B1- receive field
inhomogeneity to me.
Peace,
Matt.
From: youngmin huh ymin1...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, November 12, 2012 10:22 PM
To: Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu,
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] bad
If you get an MPRAGE and T2-SPACE you can make myelin maps too.
FreeSurfer's final surface placement benefits a lot from high resolution
images (less than 1mm) and you can still get good SNR with when you use
32-channel coils.
Peace,
Matt.
On 11/20/12 4:41 PM, Bruce Fischl
.
Also I'm not sure how a FLAIR would be better than a T2-SPACE.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Satrajit Ghosh sa...@mit.edu
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 5:51 PM
To: Matt Glasser m...@ma-tea.com
Cc: Watson, Christopher christopher.wat...@childrens.harvard.edu,
Winter, Warren warren.win
is also pretty much totally absent from the FLAIR
and in the prelim data that we've processed having the FLAIR images lets
the surface recover from pretty much all mistakes in which dura is
included
in the pial surface.
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Matt Glasser wrote:
If you make a T1 map
true. The FLAIR we use is just a T2-SPACE
scan with an inversion pulse to put CSF at the null point, so if
you can get T2-space at .7 you should be able to get FLAIR
(although you do burn some SNR with the inversion)
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Matt Glasser wrote:
Hi
Perhaps you can maximize the tksurfer window on a large monitor, take a
whole screen screenshot, and then in a photo editing program: decrease the
physical size of the image (in mm or inches) while not decreasing the
matrix size. You can do this in photoshop in Image Image Size And
then change
I've noticed this at well when something goes wrong before mri_cc. It gets
stuck in some kind of infinite loop. You might check that the linear and
nonlinear registration worked correctly.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Dawei Liu ldw70...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:49 AM
To:
I'd collect highres T1w as well and then refine the 1mm surfaces using that.
Peace,
Matt.
From: SHAHIN NASR sha...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Monday, February 25, 2013 1:39 PM
To: Freesurfer freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu, Bruce Fischl
fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu, Doug Greve
I would check the mri_em_register registrations of the step that
immediately precedes mri_watershed (and produces
talairach_with_skull.lta). We found that most of the variability and
failures occurred in this step, and mri_watershed itself is a very robust
brain extraction algorithm when it is
this
routinely. Maybe Matt Glasser or someone else can chime in?
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Ellspermann, Kara wrote:
I am new to Freesurfer, and I am trying to input/process preterm infant
brain data (ultimately attempting longitudinal registration). I already
have
surfaces generated from Caret
Do the surfaces look correct in these regions? You might post some
screenshots of subjects who have a big difference between 5.1 and 5.2 with
the 5.1 and 5.2 white and pial surfaces on volume slices that highlight
the difference. Without this kind of info, its hard to know which was
more
I find the T2w image works well for removing dura and blood vessels, but
I'm not sure FLAIR would work for T1w/T2w myelin mapping because of what
would happen to the ratio near the pial surface.
Instructions for T1w/T2w myelin mapping are available here:
Hi Greg,
I think the tracula folks might have gotten their original code from Saad
Jbabdi, but then the code-bases have probably diverged. (My apologizes if
this is not correct!). Here is Saad's publication on global tractography:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17543543/
Peace,
Matt.
Hi Michael,
Out of curiosity, does this also support the GIFTI format? If so, one could
use it to view surface data from a wide variety of software packages.
Thanks,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
There are different numbers of vertices in subjects surfaces. It is
possible to resample subjects' surfaces to a common mesh after registration,
but the FreeSurfer folks don't prefer this approach. They prefer to simply
resample the quantitative data.
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
Zero probably means no label.
Peace,
Matt.
_
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Forrest Sheng
Bao
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 3:00 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: [Freesurfer] label value 0
So I thought the issue had been solved, but perhaps not. Bruce, we (i.e.
David) think the problem with Rouhi's data is that FreeSurfer did not detect
that the original images were tipped forward 90 degrees and as a result the
surface registration failed intermittently (i.e. in some subjects it
Hi,
Is it possible to view control points (in control.dat), that you already
created? If so, how do you do it?
Thanks,
Matt.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hi Bruce,
That didn't happen, but perhaps because I loaded the volume with -f instead
of the more standard way. I'll try it again.
Thanks,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:53 PM
To: Matt Glasser
Cc
Hi Michael,
It might have something to do with low myelin content there in general (will
make grey matter harder to tell from CSF) and late myelination (at least
part of the anterior temporal cortex has its white matter myelinate quite
late in development), which would reduce grey/white contrast.
Hi,
I am wondering what tools FreeSurfer has to convert between different affine
matrix formats.
For example, if I had a talairach.xfm that did a better job than
talairach.lta, is there a way to convert from one to the other? What about
FSL FLIRT matricies? Can these be interconverted
on a
specific case.
doug
Matt Glasser wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering what tools FreeSurfer has to convert between different
affine matrix formats.
For example, if I had a talairach.xfm that did a better job than
talairach.lta, is there a way to convert from one to the other? What
about
I think Bruce meant:
the ?h.sulc is the integrated dot
product of the movement vector with the surface normal during inflation.
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
Sent:
Greg,
I assume you are using the same surfaces as those that I gave you, right?
Thanks,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Greg Burgess
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 2:28 PM
To: Douglas N
I'm dredging this 2 year old post up for the benefit of Google and anyone
else who wonders about the cause of this. It is a non-fatal error (for
FreeSurfer, but perhaps not other things) that is caused by having set the
variable:
POSIXLY_CORRECT=1
It causes bc (on Debian/Ubuntu) systems to fail
Hi Greg,
I would say there are a variety of possible confounds for cortical thickness
(e.g. changes in cortical myelin content, changes in the closeness of
opposition between grey matter and the dura from brain atrophy), but that
wouldn't be one of the ones I would think of. White matter
Is there a way to adjust the grey and white matter of the aseg automatically
based on the surfaces?
Thanks,
Matt.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The
I'd be interested to hear how this goes too.
Thanks,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 4:09 PM
To: Joshua Lee
Cc: FreeSurfer
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer]
used it yet but me I don't think (unless Matt Glasser has gotten his
version working, which on second thought he probably has)
On Mon, 14
May 2012, Michael Waskom wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Is there a flag for this on recon-all? Or do you need to use
mri_make_surfaces directly?
Best,
Michael
. Then one gets the best of both worlds.
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Glasser [mailto:m...@ma-tea.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 5:36 PM
To: 'freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] ERROR: comparison in expression (FS with SGE)
I'm dredging this 2
Rather one unsets it like this:
unset POSIXLY_CORRECT
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Glasser [mailto:m...@ma-tea.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:47 PM
To: 'freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] ERROR: comparison in expression (FS with SGE)
Another
I am wondering if it is necessary to perform the taltransform (or care about
the results when it fails) to get good surfaces of non-human primate brains?
I know I can go in and manually edit it to get it right, but I would rather
not do this if it isn't critical for surface generation. Is it okay
PM
To: Matt Glasser
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Talairach on Non-human Primates
Hi Matt,
it shouldn't be needed for non-human primates, and in fact will probably
mess things up. I thought the -monkey switch disabled it, but I could be
wrong.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu
.
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Schmansky [mailto:ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 10:20 AM
To: Bruce Fischl
Cc: Matt Glasser; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Talairach on Non-human Primates
i'm not familiar with the monkey
Hi,
I am wondering if there is a way to apply the default surface based
registration that is done during recon-all to surfaces other than the sphere
so that the nodes are all lined up? I am wanting to have registered white
matter surfaces that I can map data from the volume to the surface to
is registered across
subjects, it is sufficient to register the wm surfaces.
doug
Matt Glasser wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if there is a way to apply the default surface based
registration that is done during recon-all to surfaces other than the
sphere so that the nodes are all lined up? I am
. When the sphere.reg is registered across
subjects, it is sufficient to register the wm surfaces.
doug
Matt Glasser wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if there is a way to apply the default surface based
registration that is done during recon-all to surfaces other than the
sphere so
. I think you need the surfaces for
your tractography stuff.
But if all you need is average metric data on average40, then I doubt
you need the individual surfaces on a standard mesh.
Donna
On 03/02/2010 12:58 PM, Matt Glasser wrote:
Hi Doug and Bruce,
I am somewhat surprised by your responses
It is possible to do this sort of thing in Caret (using the FreeSurfer
registration); one can create a deformation map between sphere and
sphere.reg. What do you need the deformation map for?
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
I have /usr/lib64/libtiff.so.3 linked to /usr/lib64/libtiff.so.4 which is
linked to /usr/lib64/libtiff.so.4.3.2 in my Lucid 64bit install. See if
libtiff.so.4.3.2 exists on your system in /usr/lib64 and if so:
sudo ln -s /usr/lib64/libtiff.so.4.3.2 /usr/lib64/libtiff.so.3
If not, find
The CentOS 4 download works with Ubuntu. Just make sure to get the correct
32 or 64 bit version that matches your operating system. Use uname -m to
tell.
Peace,
Matt.
_
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of
FSL's tools don't use an FA threshold for tractography. So long as there is
a consistent direction(s) to follow it will track through a voxel.
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of
Hi Doug,
It appears in FreeSurfer 5.0 the flag the bbregister script is looking for
is --fslmat but in the docs it says it is --fsl.
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N
Is it possible to convert an .xfm to an .lta or alternatively to initialize
mri_em_register with an .xfm that one has manually generated? It is not
doing a very good job for me.
Thanks,
Matt.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
MRICron's dcm2nii does a good job with par and rec files.
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 5:28 PM
To: Lindsay Nagamatsu
Cc:
I am curious about how to use mri_convert to convert wmparc.mgz back to the
space that the original nii.gz volume that I gave FreeSurfer was in without
resampling for further analysis with FSL. The volume I imported was
176x208x176, and oriented xorient: Left to Right, yorient: Posterior to
Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 5:47 PM
To: Matt Glasser
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Conversion of wmparc.mgz to Original Volume Space
without Resampling
Hi Matt,
you can give a -rl volume name switch to reslice like a template
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Conversion of wmparc.mgz to Original Volume Space
without Resampling
It depends on the resolution.
On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Matt Glasser m...@ma-tea.com wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Presumably all that was done to the volume when it was imported was
that
some zero
Just do it before you try to run any of the FreeSurfer programs. What
issues are you having? I have FreeSurfer installed on a number of Ubuntu
machines.
Peace,
Matt.
_
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of
I assume you meant sudo ln -s /usr/lib/libtiff.so.4 /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Rudolph Pienaar
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 10:04 AM
To: Ahmed, F, Me fah...@sun.ac.za
mri_convert, I want to specifically return to the same 111 volume size
and space and I provided as accurately as possible (hopefully using
the inverse of the total transform applied to the image during
processing). I know Matt Glasser has worked out a way to convert (and
apparently re-register
That looks correct to me.
Peace,
Matt.
_
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Mehul Sampat
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 3:38 PM
To: Freesurfer Mailing List
Subject: [Freesurfer] reslicing question
Hi
I believe their function is to carry blood from one place to another.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Mohammed Goryawala mgory...@fiu.edu
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 at 1:55 PM
To: Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
VirchowRobin spaces is another name for those (they are normal in small
amounts, not old strokes, and filled with CSF-like fluid).
Peace,
Matt.
On 8/21/14, 9:23 AM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Mohammed
these are dark regions, usually in inferior pallidum/putamen. There
Have a look at mris_make_surfaces.c, this is how I learned about most of
this stuff as the code is pretty well commented (and Bruce telling me
things).
Peace,
Matt.
On 9/12/14, 11:01 PM, Harms, Michael mha...@wustl.edu wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I was wondering if there is info somewhere about what
It will just run faster so long as things like memtest86 and prime95 don¹t
have errors.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Chiu, Bryan (PHTH) bryan.c...@ubc.ca
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Monday, September 29, 2014 at 4:26 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
What criteria would you use to determine one alignment was better than
another?
Peace,
Matt.
From: Caspar M. Schwiedrzik cschwie...@mail.rockefeller.edu
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 at 7:17 AM
To:
Does SUMA support GIFTI and provide a utility to convert between its
formats and GIFTI? I was also wondering what a .dset was and how to get
it into GIFTI so it could be easily used across software platforms.
Thanks,
Matt.
On 5/5/15, 5:30 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
(hcpcou...@humanconnectome.org):
http://humanconnectome.org/course-registration/2015/exploring-the-human-con
nectome.php
Hope to see you in Honolulu,
Matt Glasser.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https
You cannot have spaces in the file name unless you enclose it with quotes.
Peace,
Matt.
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Hugh Pemberton
hughpembert...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 1:34 PM
provide further help.
Peace,
Matt.
On 8/13/15, 12:12 PM, Bruce Fischl
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of
fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Jan
have you asked the HCP/Wash U group? I bet that they would know. Maybe
Mike
Harms or Matt Glasser can chime in?
Bruce
On Thu, 13
There is also the issue that grey and white matter are not truly a
homogeneous single intensity anatomically.
Peace,
Matt.
On 10/19/15, 9:23 AM, "Harms, Michael"
wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>FWIW, I've looked at a number of these
r T1. We are working on a solution.
Cheers,
Eugenio
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
> On 10 Jun 2016, at 17:04, Matt Glasser <m...@ma-tea.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> I would ju
Hi Jim,
I would just use the HCP Pipelines for that:
https://github.com/Washington-University/Pipelines, as they take care of all
of those things re FreeSurfer. I would set to using the 0.8mm templates so
that nothing is down sampled.
Peace,
Matt.
From:
I would be interested to know how well 0.7mm isotropic resolution data
performs at hippocampal segmentation. It would be better if folks could do
this then needing to acquire specialized anisotropic scans for hippocampal
segmentation.
Peace,
Matt.
From:
mentation - what is the
voxel size of the input?
Hi Matt,
you can use strategy 3 of my previous email ;-)
Cheers,
Eugenio
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
> On 9 Jun 2016, at 19:31, Matt Glasser
Look at mris_convert. If that doesn¹t help would also see if BrainVisa
allows conversion to a third format that mris_convert works with. Finally,
does BrainVisa not support GIFTI (the standard, cross-neuroimaging software
surface format)?
Peace,
Matt.
From:
Why would you want to do that?
Peace,
Matt.
From: on behalf of "Alexopoulos,
Dimitrios"
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list
Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 4:06 PM
To: Freesurfer support
I¹d add that SNR may also change if you don¹t acquire as much data axially
as you did sagittally. Really it¹s better to acquire your 3D
T1w/T2w/FLAIR scans sagittally as this is most efficient.
Peace,
Matt.
On 4/8/16, 10:23 AM, "Bruce Fischl"
I too am puzzled as to why you would want to do this. In terms of getting
improvement in the alignment across subjects TBSS is one way to approach
this. Another would be to use the fiber orientations in the registration
like these folks have done:
using PET
>maps, why we can't do it using FA maps?
>
>I will be more than happy if you can suggest me an alternative approach
>to study FA on a surface.
>
>
>Best,
>Mohamad
>
>-Original Message-
>From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>[mailto:freesur
us in tissues
>other than the brain such as liver, lung, heart, joints, etc
>
>Mohamad
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Matt Glasser
>Sent: Wednesday, M
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo