Re: [Gimp-developer] Support for SpaceNavigator

2009-06-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 20:30 +0200, Håvard Tørring wrote: The problem with this approach is that gimp ignores the value of the events, making it unusable. Browsing around the source code, I have identified that the events from the navigator are correctly identified in

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp images with text

2009-06-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 14:48 +0200, Luke R. wrote: Could you give me some more detail on this? How does the mapping work? I am having a problem in particular with Avantgarde from foundry urw. It seems to be reverting to a more Helvetica-like font. Just stop using the old-style font

Re: [Gimp-developer] open/save/export

2009-06-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 17:01 -0400, Jay Smith wrote: BTW, that Export dialog has a Help button. I think there is a bug or not-yet-implemented feature, because that Help button gets an Eeek! page on my system: /usr/share/gimp/2.0/help/en/help-missing.html whereas the Help button on the

Re: [Gimp-developer] open/save/export

2009-06-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:59 +1000, Graeme Gill wrote: It's not that hard - the internal and native format should (ideally) be a superset of all possible formats that can be read or created. Keep track of which elements are used or created in the process of editing the image, and you can

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp images with text

2009-06-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 18:15 +0200, Luke R. wrote: There seem to be a couple of problems. When the $text contains anything other than [a-z], [A-Z], [0-9], gimp_text_get_extents fails, saying it was called with an invalid argument. You need to make sure that your text is in UTF-8

Re: [Gimp-developer] select pencil/paintbrush and undo/redo from a script

2009-06-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 12:22 +0300, Ioan Calin Borcoman wrote: My gimpsketchbook app is offering an alternative (extended) interface for gimp via a plugin that acts as a proxy between the gimpsketchbook and gimp. I would like to be able to add buttons for selecting the current active

Re: [Gimp-developer] resubmitted patches: tile-cache performance improvements

2009-06-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 23:06 -0400, Christopher Montgomery wrote: Updated patches attached, including all requested coding style changes. Unless, of course, I missed any. I've pushed your changes to master now. Looking forward to see your resampler patches... Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH 1/4] Tile caching performance patches

2009-06-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 11:41 +0930, David Gowers wrote: I'd like to mention also that there are also some minor problems with whitespace Right. I suggest to add the following lines to your .emacs file: (setq c-mode-common-hook '(lambda () (setq indent-tabs-mode nil)

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH 1/4] Tile caching performance patches

2009-06-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 22:15 -0400, Christopher Montgomery wrote: For about a month I'd turned on emacs's trailing whitespace autotrim and it was a cure worse than the disease. How shall I kill my own whitespace without generating patches 4x larger than necessary due to others' trailing

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH 1/4] Tile caching performance patches

2009-06-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, first of all thanks a lot for providing these patches. I definitely want to get them merged as soon as possible. But there are a few minor issues that should be discussed first. So let me start by commenting on your first patch: On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 04:11 -0400, Christopher Montgomery

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH 2/4] Tile caching performance patches

2009-06-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 04:12 -0400, Christopher Montgomery wrote: +#ifdef TILE_PROFILING +#include sys/time.h If we use GTimeVal instead of struct timeval, we can avoid this include (and a possible portability problem). +#ifdef TILE_PROFILING + if ((cur_cache_size + tile-size)

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH 3/4] Tile caching performance patches

2009-06-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, a few more coding style despite the ones I already pointed out: + if(!tile)return FALSE; Please write this as if (! tile) return FALSE; + if(PENDING_WRITE(t)) +acc+=t-size; + t=t-next; Please insert an empty line like this: if (PENDING_WRITE (t)) acc

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH 4/4] Tile caching performance patches

2009-06-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 04:13 -0400, Christopher Montgomery wrote: -#define IDLE_SWAPPER_TIMEOUT 250 - +#define IDLE_SWAPPER_START 1000 +#define IDLE_SWAPPER_INTERVAL 20 +#define IDLE_SWAPPER_TILES_PER 10 Should that constant perhaps better be called IDLE_SWAPPER_TILES_PER_RUN ?

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH 1/4] Tile caching performance patches

2009-06-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 16:56 -0400, Christopher Montgomery wrote: As far as I know pretty much any compiler out there should be able to replace a modulo by a power-of-2 constant by the bit-wise AND operation without us explicitly doing so (see also

Re: [Gimp-developer] get notified when gimp closes from a plugin

2009-06-01 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 17:27 +0300, Ioan Calin Borcoman wrote: Is it possible to receive a signal or event in a plugin when gimp closes? I want to create a plugin with a gui window and store some persistent data between gimp restarts. If I close the gui window while gimp is running, all

Re: [Gimp-developer] Drawing a line in a GIMP plugin

2009-05-31 Thread Sven Neumann
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 20:47 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: I'm sorry, I'm developing a C plugin (tried Scheme first and it was DOG slow). Is there a C equivalent? All I'm seeing is gimp-paintbrush-register. http://developer.gimp.org/api/2.0/libgimp/index.html Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] Drawing a line in a GIMP plugin

2009-05-31 Thread Sven Neumann
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 08:40 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 20:47 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: I'm sorry, I'm developing a C plugin (tried Scheme first and it was DOG slow). Is there a C equivalent? All I'm seeing is gimp-paintbrush-register. http

Re: [Gimp-developer] API for bringing up a Save dialog

2009-05-29 Thread Sven Neumann
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:18 -0700, Akkana Peck wrote: Martin Nordholts writes: IMO we should not reuse gimp_file_save() for this but instead introduce gimp_show_save_dialog() and gimp_show_export_dialog(). I am a bit worried however that plug-ins will abuse this power. In your case, why

Re: [Gimp-developer] API for bringing up a Save dialog

2009-05-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 12:34 -0500, Ryan Krauss wrote: This is mildly hackish, but my approach is to pop up a Tk save as dialog: filetypes = [('png files', '*.png'), ('jpg files', '*.jpg'),\ ('all files', '.*')] def save_as(initialdir=None, initialfile=None):

Re: [Gimp-developer] Drawing a line in a GIMP plugin

2009-05-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 17:51 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: I'm a relative newbie trying to have a GIMP plugin draw a line (among other things). I found gdk_draw_line which seems to be what I want. It is not what you want. GDK is a drawing toolkit used by GTK+ for drawing user

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] fix to batch console support

2009-05-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:08 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: Christopher Montgomery wrote: The batch mode console is using stdio but never flushing its output after fwrite()s. This still usually works by accident when using batch mode from a terminal, but it means scripts generally

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gradient manager

2009-05-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 23:35 +0100, Paul A. wrote: Hello, the gradient manager that gimp has right now is extremely complicated to use and inefficient. Theres too much stuff you have to do to get a simple gradient , so I would like to show you an example of how it could be in the future.

Re: [Gimp-developer] retrieve info from gimp via script-fu-server

2009-05-18 Thread Sven Neumann
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 16:40 +0300, Ioan Calin Borcoman wrote: 1. Is it possible to obtain any info from the script-fu-server except 'Success'? For example, if I send '(gimp-image-get-name 1)' for execution to the server, I would expect to receive something like 'foo.xcf' (or 'Untitled', if a

Re: [Gimp-developer] external control of gimp

2009-05-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 21:18 +0300, Ioan Calin Borcoman wrote: I was thinking of trying a client-server system for this. The gimp would start a server when it loads the plugins and the button window would be a separate app that sends whatever command the server plugin accepts. The server

Re: [Gimp-developer] [wish] center on focused area on zoom out

2009-05-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 15:08 +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote: DEFGHIJK|12345|ABC DEFGHIJK|12345|ABC letters are off the screen, digits are visible. | denotes edges Now -- I would like to zoom out on 5 (I would like to focus on that area), how do I do? What is your definition of

Re: [Gimp-developer] [wish] when pasting without any reference use mouse cursor position

2009-05-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 11:17 -0700, Akkana Peck wrote: I've found the paste centers behavior quite useful, and have recommended it to lots of other people as a quick way to center a layer (which used to be a FAQ, though less so now that the align tool exists). We could add Center Layer

Re: [Gimp-developer] [wish] when pasting without any reference use mouse cursor position

2009-05-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 20:48 +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote: On Thursday 14 May 2009 20:17:43 Akkana Peck wrote: I've found the paste centers behavior quite useful, It is predictable and more useful than random placement for sure. But with hires monitor I would still like some kind

Re: [Gimp-developer] [wish] when pasting without any reference use mouse cursor position

2009-05-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 13:21 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote: When there is no selection, and you paste, the paste typically ends up 3,926,201 screens above where you are working (for me at least). Not sure what version of GIMP you are using. But the current code has the following logic: If

Re: [Gimp-developer] [wish] when pasting without any reference use mouse cursor position

2009-05-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 21:16 +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote: GIMP doesn't place the pasted content randomly. What makes you think so? Because I don't see any relevance in second paste to what I do (and where I do) and I see no relevance between first paste and the second one. And

Re: [Gimp-developer] [wish] center on focused area on zoom out

2009-05-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 20:20 +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote: Currently the image is glued to the mouse cursor which I don't find any useful -- I would like to see big picture (or more details), I move the mouse anyway. Keeping the pixel under the mouse cursor fixed has the advantage

Re: [Gimp-developer] Procedural call to undo?

2009-05-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 16:21 -0400, Rob Antonishen wrote: Now that could be useful. Call it GIMP-IMAGE-STATE-SAVE and -RESTORE possibly. Or push and pop.. Not undo. If push and pop, it should be limited to the state the image was in when the script/plugin was initiated. We call this

Re: [Gimp-developer] [wish] alignment rotation

2009-05-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 15:04 +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote: In GIMP there is such feature as rotate. This is of course useful but when correcting, you can say alignment, it is also useful to have ability to rotate image in such way that some point would make horizontal or vertical

Re: [Gimp-developer] [wish] when pasting without any reference use mouse cursor position

2009-05-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 21:42 +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote: On Friday 15 May 2009 21:23:57 Sparr wrote: When you paste a second time, the first paste should still be visible and selected(?) and the floating selection is the current drawable, and thus the second paste end up on top

Re: [Gimp-developer] [wish] center on focused area on zoom out

2009-05-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 21:55 +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote: On Friday 15 May 2009 21:38:04 Sven Neumann wrote: Keeping the pixel under the mouse cursor fixed has the advantage that the behavior for zooming in and out is consistent. Well, it would be consistent if gimp consistently

Re: [Gimp-developer] Dockable Dialogs Should be Dockable Everywhere

2009-03-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 21:38 +0100, drizzt wrote: The kernel internals are moving, and a lot, but this the user don't care about. you can rewrite gimp every day if you want, nobody (or no user at least) will care, if the user interface is stable. Sorry, but the GIMP user interface

Re: [Gimp-developer] Please restore removed crop tool functionality

2009-03-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 10:24 +0200, Sampo Niskanen wrote: However, I'd say that this is quite an unintuitive way of performing cropping. If I want to crop an image, my attention goes to the features offered by the crop tool, not the selection tool. That's the whole point. You don't

Re: [Gimp-developer] a good student UI project...

2009-03-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 10:32 +0100, Tobias Jakobs wrote: P.S. Isn't a metadata viewer/editor a nice GSOC project idea? There is a metadata viewer/editor plug-in in the GIMP source tree for a long time already. Someone just needs to finish this project as it appears that Raphael is not going

Re: [Gimp-developer] Dockable Dialogs Should be Dockable Everywhere

2009-03-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 14:52 -0700, drizzt wrote: Just think of the most used piece of code on a GNU/Linux system: the Linux kernel. Didn't you know that the user interface is stable ? How would you feel if between releases the behavior of interfaces changed, and when asking the kernel

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] babl portability patches, and a test failure

2009-03-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 17:03 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Has anyone been able to find time to look at my patch queue for babl? One minor thing I noticed is the patch which adds and include of config.h so it is done in all(?) files. Is it really necessary to

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 23:21 -0400, Louis Desjardins wrote: At this point in the discussion, it would be great to hear if the quality of the information provided so far in terms of explanations and examples is enough to lead someone or a group of developers in the GIMP team to envision

Re: [Gimp-developer] Dockable Dialogs Should be Dockable Everywhere

2009-03-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 20:29 +0100, David Odin wrote: Still that narrow minded? You obviously didn't read the drizzt's post at all! Drizzt was comparing the linux kernel _user_ interface with the gimp's _user_ interface. As far as I know the kernel doesn't have a user interface in the

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:31 -0500, Chris Mohler wrote: So to recap, I would welcome a printer-friendly PDF export if someone wants to work on it, though without CMYK support built-in it's not very useful just yet. From what I understand though, once GEGL integration is complete, any

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 20:43 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: The product vision states that GIMP is a high-end photo manipulation application and that certainly includes support for editing images in the CMYK color space. It certainly doesn't. Photos are taken in an RGB color space. It

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 21:02 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: Yes, processing shall as long as possible be done in RGB, but at some point you need to convert to the CMYK color space and a high-end photo app should support editing also in this color space. Why? Because you say so? All

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:27 -0500, Chris Mohler wrote: It is helpful to see an approximation of CMYK on the screen before you go to print - many colors available in the RGB color space fall outside of the CMYK gamut. RGB blue is likely the worst offender - fill an image with solid

Re: [Gimp-developer] CMYK editing (Was: GIMP PDF export plugin)

2009-03-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:51 -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote: I do work in the printing industry, and I can tell you that output is still CMYK, and will remain CMYK for at least the next few years. Output, yes, of course. But where in this process do you actually edit an image in CMYK? I

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 21:36 +0200, LightningIsMyName wrote: I believe that we should have the option to export multi-paged PDFs, since we have the option to import them, and to me it makes sense that we should be able to export what we can import. The whole point of calling it Import is

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 09:47 -0500, Chris Mohler wrote: I see two possible use cases: 1. Proofing artwork - you need to prepare a proof before going to press. You send that proof to a client and they print it out and get a reasonable hard proof. 2. Submission to a printing company -

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 19:33 +0100, peter sikking wrote: bummer about the non-standard, but would industrial-strength TIFF in and export not be significantly more in line with our product vision than industrial-strength pdf in and export? Depends on what gets used nowadays. If

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 22:04 +0200, LightningIsMyName wrote: 1. How will the user create multi-paged PDFs? Should he choose different images, one for each page? (This sounds like the most reasonable way compared to other ways I thought of). Why would we want to allow the user to create

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 12:41 +0100, gg wrote: The other question is licensing of pdf. IRCC pdf viewing is allowed in a fairly liberal sense but creating pdf is what Abode make money on and retains the rights to. I am pretty sure that this is not the case. The GIMP Print plug-in creates

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 12:41 +0100, gg wrote: Indeed, what is the advantage of pdf export of a single image? If it is just a simple PDF, then nothing. But if it includes color profiles, support for spot colors, resolution-independent text layers, crop markers etc., then it would be a

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP PDF export plugin

2009-03-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 19:15 +0200, Lightning LIMN wrote: I managed to export text while keeping the same appearance that it had in GIMP using PangoCairo. Exporting images with cairo was also possible if I saved the images first as PNGs and then used cairo PNG surfaces to draw them. Why

Re: [Gimp-developer] Exif support for tiff files

2009-03-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi. On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 20:42 +0100, Sebastian Kraft wrote: I started to look into source code to see how much work it would be to implement exif support for Tiff files. Currently it's very annoying that gimp skips exif information from tiff files I created with a RAW converter...

Re: [Gimp-developer] Behavior when saving a selection to channel

2009-03-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 07:26 -0400, Rob Antonishen wrote: My opinion (which probably breaks some other intended behaviour) is that if the active drawable is a channel, pasting should default to a paste into that active channel It does, of course. There's just this internal design flaw

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Save Confirmation Alert does not meet Gnome Human Interface Guidelines.

2009-03-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 00:13 -0400, Alec Burgess wrote: Also, drag-to-desktop from Tools-[x] - you will lose changes dialog mentioned earlier in this or a related thread doesn't work in Windows, though I guess you weren't asserting that it would (just some *-nix desktops?) As I said,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Save Confirmation Alert does not meet Gnome Human Interface Guidelines.

2009-03-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 02:22 +, Jarlath Reidy wrote: When closing an individual document in Gimp, the dialog presents these buttons; (modifiers in parenthesis) Do[n]'t Save, [C]ancel, [S]ave The Gnome HIG states that this should be: Close [w]ithout Saving, [C]ancel, Save [A]s

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Save Confirmation Alert does not meet Gnome Human Interface Guidelines.

2009-03-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 13:03 +0100, peter sikking wrote: this is really small fry. the stuff you find in the appendix of a usability test or expert evaluation report. for instance 2 orders of magnitude more serious is gtk's (?) insistence to show gnome file dialogs on non-gnome UI

Re: [Gimp-developer] A GSoC Purpose: Improve the Performance of SIOX

2009-03-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 11:52 +0800, Jenny wrote: My name is Ding Jie, and Jenny is my English name. I'm a first-grade post-graduate student, major in Image Processing, and very interested in algorithms of this field. Thanks for neo's suggestion, I found SIOX is very interesting. I have

Re: [Gimp-developer] A GSoC Purpose: Improve the Performance of SIOX

2009-03-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 19:41 +0800, Jenny wrote: I didn't read the code of SIOX and GIMP yet, and be not sure if the features in this page http://www.siox.org/preview.html has been implemented in GIMP's current development version. The Detail Refinement Brush that is mentioned on this

Re: [Gimp-developer] SVG brushes

2009-03-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:50 +1030, David Gowers wrote: I think we would have to. At least, in my vision, where we want GIH/GBR to be eventually deprecated in preference of SVG. This would require 2 things: a) support multiple brushes in a SVG brush file, ala GIH (presumably a group for

Re: [Gimp-developer] SVG brushes

2009-03-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 13:34 +0200, Alexia Death wrote: Use of image hose for brush transformation is abuse that hopefully is no longer needed. They are useful ho ever for complex animated brushes and as such should remain to be supported. I myself have made for example a hose brush that

Re: [Gimp-developer] problem in compiling gegl

2009-03-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, please read the pkg-config(1) manual page to make yourself familiar how this stuff works. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Behavior when saving a selection to channel

2009-03-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 11:33 -0400, Rob Antonishen wrote: Sven mentioned other uses, like spot colour and halftoning. I can't find any references on using gimp channels for spot colour, in fact google only finds me claims that a weakness of gimp is that it does NOT support spot colours.

[Gimp-developer] heads up for 2.6.6

2009-03-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I'd like to do a 2.6.6 release pretty soon now. We need to get this release out to be compatible with the upcoming GTK+ 2.16 release. So if you have patches pending that address bugs on the GIMP 2.6 milestone, or updated translations, please make sure that they are committed in time. Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] Font are small of tool-box in gimp 2.5.4

2009-03-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 21:20 +0100, Pigeon wrote: * app/widgets/gimpdock.c: made the font scale factor for the docks configurable in gtkrc. * themes/Default/gtkrc * themes/Small/gtkrc: for documentation purposes, added the default value for

Re: [Gimp-developer] save + export...

2009-03-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 18:27 +0100, peter sikking wrote: first, Copy visible as new image could easily turn out too smart, but since the bottom Background layer prefers to be one without alpha, I can see something like: when ‘visible’ has effectively universal full opacity, then omit

Re: [Gimp-developer] Behavior when saving a selection to channel

2009-03-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 21:48 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: Speaking of which (and sorry for interrupting the thread), could somebody please fix Qmask message showing up in localized GIMP instead of Quick mask translation when you toggle quick mask with Shift+Q? Where does this

Re: [Gimp-developer] save + export...

2009-03-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 16:03 +0100, peter sikking wrote: no, squeezing these export options in the save dialog is not possible. I think there is a misunderstanding here. What people suggested is not to put the export options into the Save file-chooser but into the dialog that the save

Re: [Gimp-developer] save + export...

2009-03-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:15 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: Not all save plug-ins do this, but for those that do it seems to make a lot of choice to integrate the export questions there. That was supposed to read ... it seems to make a lot of sense Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] Behavior when saving a selection to channel

2009-03-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=574418 now has a patch that implements this change. - blinking the channels/selections dialog: good - showing the channels/selections dialog as the top: rather not - making in the channels dialog case the new selection/channel the the

Re: [Gimp-developer] The Gimp

2009-03-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, first of all, the application is called GNU Image Manipulation Program, or short GIMP, but not The Gimp. Please try to keep that in mind. On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 18:56 +0530, sumith pandilwar wrote: I am ineterested to apply for Gsoc 2009 - the gimp org.In the ideas of Gsoc 2008 there was a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Behavior when saving a selection to channel

2009-03-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 14:38 +0100, peter sikking wrote: this may look to you like we are only shuffling the furniture, but I cannot overstate how much this change is needed in the interest of usability: really. I am not exaggerating. a significant portion of our core user group

Re: [Gimp-developer] Behavior when saving a selection to channel

2009-03-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi. On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 17:15 +0100, peter sikking wrote: hmmm, there must be a misunderstanding here. Yes, obviously there is. But it is on your side. if you read carefully what I am proposing then you'll see that the only thing that is going to change about the channels dialog itself

Re: [Gimp-developer] text box

2009-03-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:30 -0700, joff roepcke wrote: I do simple graphic design- mostly ads for local businesses- usually with text. In order to play with a body of text, changing fonts and sizes, etc, you have to have a text box... hitting enter might work for one line, but formatting

Re: [Gimp-developer] Behavior when saving a selection to channel

2009-03-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 21:05 +0100, peter sikking wrote: and I can't believe that proposing an alignment of GIMP UI with the realities of users expectations meets such a dogged resistance. There is no dogged resistance. I just had the impression that you believed that storing selections

Re: [Gimp-developer] Behavior when saving a selection to channel

2009-03-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 20:59 -0500, Rob Antonishen wrote: That might not have been the best example. A guess a more useful example would be that after building a complicated selection to isolate a portion of an image (say the sky) the user wants to save that selection, then modify the

Re: [Gimp-developer] save + export...

2009-03-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:50 +0200, Alexia Death wrote: Does this mean that the annoying pop-up asking If I want to export will go away if I choose export? The dialog does not really ask you if you want to export. It informs you that the image can't be saved because the format you have

Re: [Gimp-developer] save + export...

2009-03-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 07:33 -0500, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote: I also think that it must be possible to export to GIMP file types. This is necessary so that more than one version of GIMP data files can be supported. (ie, GIMP 4.0 might still need to create GIMP 2.x

Re: [Gimp-developer] save + export...

2009-03-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:17 +0100, peter sikking wrote: right. one thing I have no overview of is how many ‘topics’ there are for which there are dialogs. Up to now I have seen layers, transparency, bit-depths. Let's have a look at the capabilities that the save plug-ins announce:

Re: [Gimp-developer] save + export...

2009-03-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:03 +0200, Alexia Death wrote: Why would I convert it beforehand? Why would a user need to do a bunch of actions that serve no purpose, are mostly 100% automatic and even hinder when I want to follow the export action up with a native save? Because they are not

Re: [Gimp-developer] save + export...

2009-03-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 17:24 +0100, Jon Senior wrote: Just to present the opposing case. My workflow is: 1) Open raw image via the ufraw plugin. 2) Retouch as necessary, saving as xcf file. 3) Copy visible as new image 4) Resize new image for print or web + sharpen as neccessary. 5)

Re: [Gimp-developer] Behavior when saving a selection to channel

2009-03-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:46 -0500, Rob Antonishen wrote: I posted this as a bug, and was told by Sven Neumann the behaviour was intentional and to raise it here. Thanks for bringing this discussion to the mailing-list. The current behaviour is confusing to a user because of the following

Re: [Gimp-developer] Possible feature for Clone Tool?

2009-03-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 21:53 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: It certainly is possible to do (after all, we're talking about software here) and to me this sounds like an improvement. Possible, yes. But it is not easily doable with the current tools framework and it might turn out to be a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Stroke with Ink Tool

2009-02-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 17:34 -0500, Rob Antonishen wrote: I am using the latest windows binary and have a problem stroking either paths or selections with the ink tool.. What version is that exactly ? Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] IPTC EXIF Information

2009-02-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 20:59 -0600, Alan Jones wrote: I have been watching and searching for a while but have not found much so I decided to ask. Is IPTC and EXIF support on the road map for GIMP in the near future? There have been people working on this, but that effort was never

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.6.5

2009-02-15 Thread Sven Neumann
GIMP 2.6.5 is another bug-fix release in the stable GIMP 2.6 series. The source can be downloaded from ftp.gimp.org or from one of the mirrors listed at http://gimp.org/downloads/#mirrors. Binary packages for the various supported platforms should become available soon; please check the Downloads

Re: [Gimp-developer] How to show GTK+ version (in Windows)

2009-02-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 15:51 -0500, Alec Burgess wrote: When starting GIMP from command line (in Windows) how do you show the GTK+ version? gimp-2.6 --version --verbose Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] Silent profile embedding.

2009-02-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 20:03 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: I agree that someone should sit down and specify exactly how we want color management to work before doing major surgery. Yes. We absolutely need a document that describes the workflows that are handled by the current

Re: [Gimp-developer] Silent profile embedding.

2009-02-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 05:52 +0900, Yoshinori Yamakawa wrote: See the following image: http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/images/gimp_profile_status_comparison.png In case of using the GIMP and any other softwares, handling the image without color profile is very important. Ah, I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Silent profile embedding.

2009-02-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 23:03 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: So I can go ahead and revert this commit then? (rev 23135): 2007-08-07 Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org * plug-ins/common/png.c (save_image): in the absence of an embedded color profile, write the sRGB chunk

Re: [Gimp-developer] Silent profile embedding.

2009-02-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 09:41 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: I think we should have behave like this: * Color profiles shall only be embedded/referenced in an exported/saved image if there is a color profile attached to the GimpImage * When opening an image without a color profile

Re: [Gimp-developer] GPS - Gimp Paint Studio

2009-02-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 16:04 +0100, jEsuSdA 8) wrote: El Miércoles, 4 de Febrero de 2009 00:41:05 David Gowers escribió: One thing I noticed, is that presets for gimp-mixbrush-tool are included; these presets will only work if your GIMP has been patched with the patch available here:

Re: [Gimp-developer] quit signal for plugins

2009-02-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 08:12 -0600, Glimmer Labs wrote: It seems like several different plugins could take advantage of that because they make temporary images. (or would this still be only on plugin quit and not gimp quit?) I think it would make sense to call the quit method in all

Re: [Gimp-developer] quit signal for plugins

2009-02-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 10:27 -0600, Glimmer Labs wrote: If a plugin has a quit function that hangs or takes a long time, won't that affect the gimp when the quit function is normally called (on closing of plugin)? I very much doubt that any real-world plug-in is actually using the quit

Re: [Gimp-developer] GPS - Gimp Paint Studio

2009-02-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 22:12 +0100, jEsuSdA 8) wrote: Ramón Miranda has published his nice Gimp Paint Studio for Gimp. GPS is a set of brushes, presets and color palettes specifically made for digital painters. You could see information and download the GPS and the GPS Manual from:

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Patch] Opening, color correcting and saving 16-bits-per-channel PNGs

2009-02-01 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 21:51 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: * Elementary load/save support for formats that support higher bit depths such as PNG, TIFF and OpenEXR. As far as I can see GEGL does not have a TIFF load and save operation yet. So anyone who is interested in being able to load

Re: [Gimp-developer] quit signal for plugins

2009-02-01 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 14:33 -0600, Glimmer Labs wrote: I have been developing a plugin that involves users editing files and I need to be able to prompt them to save when the gimp closes. I have tried using the quit signal in pluginInfo: GimpPlugInInfo PLUG_IN_INFO = { NULL,

Re: [Gimp-developer] trunk - new status for empty images

2009-01-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 00:08 -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: But when trying i I could not help bu tnote it also show upswht the text tool -- text tool should be able to work with an epty image, should'nt it? Please test if the text tool does indeed work on an empty image and if it works

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Patch] Opening, color correcting and saving 16-bits-per-channel PNGs

2009-01-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, there are two issues with your patch that we should try to solve. The first is that your approach doesn't follow the roadmap we've set for this. Our decision was not to introduce high bit depths before we haven't changed all tools, all core operations and at least provide an API for plug-ins

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >