-Original Message-
From: LuKreme [mailto:krem...@kreme.com]
Sent: Thursday, 17 December 2009 4:59 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list
On 16-Dec-2009, at 16:11, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
So far only 1 person on this list has
The trouble with this is how often are these rules being re-examined
and re-evaluated?
Not that often. HABEAS has been through three iterations since those
rules were set at −4 and −8.
What is enabled by default should be the safest possible settings.
Relying on a third party that is
But I will miss (a) the entertainment value of some of his posts (his
dark forces one from earlier today was a classic) --AND-- last but
not
least--I will miss his willingness to break through the political
correctness and bring up various points that few others were willing
(or
brave
Hello,
The taunting *is* the issue. The rest of the arguments, about design
and
defaults, are carried on by numerous individuals in a quite civilized
manner. But when someone starts throwing arond stupid accusations, then
the person attacked focuses their efforts on 'defending' themselves,
I do note that the company concerned continues spamming on a daily
basis
and remains white listed:
80.75.69.201
sa-accredit.habeas.com
list.dnswl.org
So please, spare me the sob story about what a wonderful idea HABEAS
is.
Talk is cheap, action speaks louder than words.
+1 to that. I
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cardwell [mailto:spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 October 2009 11:54 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geocities closed
Alex wrote:
Thought I would pass along that geocities closed up and went home
today:
-Original Message-
From: rich...@buzzhost.co.uk [mailto:rich...@buzzhost.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 3:00 a.m.
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geocities closed
I just found this one working:
-Original Message-
From: --[ UxBoD ]-- [mailto:ux...@splatnix.net]
Sent: Monday, 14 September 2009 11:27 p.m.
To: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Non scoring 'Bank Deposit' spam
- Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
| On
-Original Message-
From: Charles Gregory [mailto:cgreg...@hwcn.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 15 September 2009 9:34 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Drivel
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote:
(more drivel)
Good users all. Never heard of a troll?
Nonsensical.
-Original Message-
From: mouss [mailto:mo...@ml.netoyen.net]
Sent: Monday, 7 September 2009 9:59 a.m.
To: Justin Mason
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: antispam comparison by virus bulletin
Justin Mason a écrit :
In fairness, they got in touch to ask for help in
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Friday, 28 August 2009 1:34 p.m.
To: Irish Online Help Desk
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Your message to the Irish Online Help Desk Re:
ObfuscationQuestion
See, this is one of the
+1 to that.
I'm sick of seeing people being flamed in here. Makes you not want to post, TBH.
Michael Hutchinson
-Original Message-
From: Evan Platt [mailto:e...@espphotography.com]
Sent: Friday, 21 August 2009 3:18 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: your mail
At 07
that is delivered has
dropped so significantly since then is... quite remarkable. (at a loss
for other words).
So perhaps instead of adding another RBL, maybe some admins need to
consider adding in some HELO checking / rejection.
Thanks and Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:cpoll...@embarqmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 17 August 2009 10:45 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: received-header: unparseable:
I keep seeing this when running some messages throught spamassassin -D
-t. Is this having an effect on
, but do not use that.
We have made 6 exceptions for hosts that do not pass the HELO argument
properly, that are out of our control, but known to our network (ie:
trusted via VPN, etc). They haven't relayed any Spam either ;)
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
be Administering a Mail Filtering system
at all.
Just my 2cents.
Michael Hutchinson.
-Original Message-
If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are
very high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000
incoming delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false
positive from Pyzor or DCC yet, and have been using both for
see FP's it would
be a surprise, and the first I've heard of it, personally.
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
memory well consumed for performance
reasons.
(Debian 3.1 Sarge).
That looks good.
These are superficial suggestions, of course.
They all help, John. Thanks for your response and ideas! :)
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
locally with network tests enabled.
Any pointers would be greatly appreciated ;)
Thanks and Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Limited
Hello Matt, thanks for the response.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:mkettler...@verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:26 a.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Hello everyone
Hello Dave,
-Original Message-
From: Dave Koontz [mailto:dkoo...@mbc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:34 a.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
Michael Hutchinson wrote ... (4/7/2009 7:09 PM):
I have made some changes
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:31 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:09 +1200, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know
MailServer:~/spamassassin# spamassassin -D dns -t /root/SpamA.txt
[27256] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[27256] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.61
You might want to fire up CPAN and upgrade Net::DNS.
[choke]. The last time I used CPAN for upgrading anything on this box,
it
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 March 2009 10:17 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: JoeJobbed - Vbounce plugin - SPF?.
On 17.03.09 14:02, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
I'm running Spamassassin 3.1.7, with netqmail
publish them) but I guess
that's an MTA question:)
Thanks in advance for any useful information :)
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
-Original Message-
From: Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz [mailto:luis.daniel.lu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 March 2009 9:19 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hopfield nerons for porn image detection
Good one,
Hopfield networks are not the fastest, but they can
plenty of people are greedy, gullible, uninformed, overly trusting,
stupid, or some combination of the above
This also means: Anyone that doesn't use a computer as much as an
E-Mail administrator
You can't expect everyone to know enough about Spam to not be fooled by
it. The reason people do
.
HTH
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
-Original Message-
From: mouss [mailto:mo...@ml.netoyen.net]
Sent: Thursday, 22 January 2009 9:40 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can't locate object method new via package Net::DNS::RR::TXT
Brian J. Murrell a écrit :
I seem
Hello brunope...@aol.com,
Though it might sound mean to the un-initiated, I totally agree with Kai. If
you have a Mail Server admin, and they are putting the job of fixing
Spamassassin on the user, they are not doing their job. You may need a new Mail
Server admin. Make a complaint to
Hello,
You could write a Meta rule that contained two sub rules - one for matching
The Bat! mailer, and the other matching the chat.ru link at the bottom.
Fire a score if both rules hit. It may not be optimal, but it got rid of that
Spam for me, and I haven't had a FP yet.
If you check out
Hello,
Be careful with the character-set matching rules. I was using some of them and
got a high rate of FP's - it was mainly because of the koi8-r charset, and
scoring against that meant I was also scoring against perfectly legitimate
technical resource newsletters that are in English.
Hello,
There was some discussion on this list a while back about catching Spam
that contains the same E-Mail address in the TO and FROM lines. I think
it was decided that this could not be done, for some reason. I just read
a post on the SARE mailing list from Tom Brown containing some rules
I was just supplying info I found that related to an earlier discussion,
that might be useful to some rule writers out there. I found it
interesting that someone had discovered how to match TO and FROM in S.A.
But yes, MTA level would be better. Sorry if I missed any archives that
detailed
,__TVD_BODY,__TVD_MIME_ATT_TP
But must have missed enough for the combined rules not to fire.
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Greg Skouby [mailto:gsko...@mail.sitesnow.com] On Behalf Of Greg
Skouby
Sent: 18 December 2008 9:50 a.m.
To: users
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4 December 2008 3:39 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: bohunu
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 7:01 pm, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Hello,
I was using Pyzor until about 2 months ago. It was quite
-Original Message-
From: Niels Przybilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3 December 2008 6:01 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: bohunu
Hi,
is somebody here using bohunu.com
Is it worth testing it ?
BR Niels
Hello,
I was using Pyzor until about 2 months
what the score is here?
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
| Phone: 0800 328 324
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Web: http://www.manux.co.nz/
-Original Message-
From: Ned Slider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1 October 2008 12:15 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: False Positive on SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION rule
Ned Slider wrote:
Hi List,
I'm getting some FP hits against the SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION rule in
Hello All,
There were so many messages regarding this new Block List, I have to
admit I have not read them all. I get the general idea that this new
Barracuda Reputation Block List isn't all that hot.
For instance, how do Barracuda generate their Block List? I don't think
this has been answered
to deliver a
message who's recipients don't exist here?
Thanks for any help in advance,
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
| Phone: 0800 328 324
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Web: http://www.manux.co.nz/
To:
users@spamassassin.apache.org... the apache listserv turns around and
Bcc's all the messages it gets to all of its recipients.
Well, that does make good sense.
Thank-you Matt for the quick and informative reply :)
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
Hello,
I really don't see how Spamassassin is not up to par, considering many high
end Net App's use Spamassassin and promote corporate level products that
include it. Maybe it needs to be configured correctly?
In fact, I don't think I've seen any real rival to Spamassassin - except,
maybe,
-Original Message-
From: James Wilkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3 September 2008 7:23 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: CPAN Install Fails
Bob Cohen wrote:
I'm running Fedora v9. All of the prerequisite and optional modules
installed with no problem.
Perl itself a little better... I bought a
book to do that :)
HTH, Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Limited.
light shed upon the matter,
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 August 2008 1:35 p.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: e greeting exe link
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
I would be hoping to match the same sort
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 August 2008 1:49 p.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: e greeting exe link
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
But only match it from the last trailing / character. In other
-Original Message-
From: doktour1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 June 2008 08:02 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: HELP!! spamasssin killing my server
If I disable spamassassin in my procmail file. The server load goes down
to
85 or less processes in a
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3 May 2008 10:14 a.m.
To: users
Subject: Pyzor DCC
When already running Spamassassin with Razor how much would adding
Pyzor and DCC to the mix help?
Matt
Pyzor certainly helped our site, but not as much as Razor.
In regards to Pyzor. I'm wondering if anyone out there is using this
at any large scale. Unlike the razor-agent which appears to be a Perl
module that gets loaded at startup, I'm concerned about SA having to
exec the python interpreter and having that setup/teardown time for
each and every
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 April 2008 8:48 a.m.
To: James Wilkinson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Canadian Spam - tired of writing rules!
James Wilkinson writes:
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
There's been
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 April 2008 9:08 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Spamassassin Users
Subject: Re: Dnsbl checks
=?utf-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBUYXlsb3I=?= writes:
I'm having some issues getting the dns blacklists to work on a
-Original Message-
From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 April 2008 7:25 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: SPF and Hotmail
On Wed, April 16, 2008 00:14, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
domain:
def_whitelist_auth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
user
,
/Hiram
Michael Hutchinson-3 wrote:
-Original Message-
Sir,
You or someone else, has managed to break apt-get's info about S.A.
Im
not going into fixing that, that is a Debian question.
You need to download the package manually with 'wget'.
You can apt-get
?
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
Phone: 0800 328 324 | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.manux.co.nz/
to. Is there any way around this?
I know there is a SARE ruleset against Pharmacy Spam, but I am very
hesitant to employ it because we have several clients that are pharmacy
outlets, and I worry those rules will burn them.
Thanks in advance, for any information.
Michael Hutchinson
Manux
-Original Message-
From: hiram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 April 2008 4:32 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading
Hi again!
Sorry, that's what my wife means when she says: you hear but you
don't
listen :-((. Thanks for the answers.
Still, I
FAQ,
they have a trailing full-stop after the address name and I don't know
if this is right or not. And, is local.cf the correct place to setup
URIBL's?
Thanks for any information in advance,
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
-Original Message-
From: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 April 2008 11:20 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DNS Blocklists with Spamassassin (scoring only)
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
uridnsbl URIBL_DSBL list.dsbl.org. TXT
body URIBL_DSBL
-Original Message-
From: Craig Cocca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 April 2008 6:40 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Listing all rules and all scores
Spamassassin Users,
Is there an easy way to get spamassassin to list out all of the rules
and all of the
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2008 12:35 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamassassin lint warnings
Thanks Mike. However, I'm getting the same warnings for a majority of
the .cf files in
-Original Message-
From: Rod G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 April 2008 1:26 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: spamassassin lint warnings
Hello. I'm running SA 3.2.4. When I run spamassassin --lint -D I get
a bunch of warnings like those below. I'm
-Original Message-
From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 31 March 2008 12:38 p.m.
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Failed to check the emails
Piotr Zalewa wrote:
But some are coming not being checked ...
I can find this in the header of the message:
with
,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__M
SO
E_MID_WRONG_CASE,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__SANE_MSGID,__UNUSABLE_MSGID
As I said - emails sent normally from other servers are being checked
for spam
Piotr
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 13:02 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2008 3:18 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: SA-update error
Using Spamassassin 3.1.8. I haven't updated SA in about six months.
Ran
SA-update -D using the default channel of
any Eastern European languages- is there a
quick
way to catch these?
On 20.03.08 08:54, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
You could use the ok_languages and ok_locales settings. I'm sure
discussions on those can be found in the archives.
that should be enough imho. CHARSET_FARAWAY
-Original Message-
From: Yet Another Ninja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2008 1:48 a.m.
To: Arvid Ephraim Picciani
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: blogspot spam
On 3/19/2008 1:24 PM, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008
-Original Message-
From: Mike Pepe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2008 5:18 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Cyrillic spam
For some strange reason, I'm seeing Cyrillic spams very frequently
lately.
None of my users read any Eastern European
-Original Message-
From: Arvid Ephraim Picciani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2008 9:04 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: blogspot spam
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 20:48:00 Michael Hutchinson wrote:
For those that don't run SA 3.2.3, you
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NFN Smith
Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2008 1:54 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cyrillic spam
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Pepe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
doesn't seem to be enough to keep the Spam down to a reasonable
level.
Thanks in advance,
Michael Hutchinson.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 14 March 2008 12:09 p.m.
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Plugin eval failed
Hi all,
I upgraded to sa 3.2.4
And I've been restarting spamd every 15 minutes just to keep mail
coming
in,
This is
From: Agnello George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2008 7:07 p.m.
To: Spamassassin
Subject: directly going to spam folder in yahoo
HI
i am facing a problem from sending mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to my yahoo
account , i receive the
-Original Message-
From: Bob Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 17 March 2008 2:10 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: How to catch gibberish spam before URIBL lists it?
These eventually show up in the URIBL but with the start of the wave
they are not
Hi all,
A few months ago we had to restart our Bayes database, as it went
corrupt, according to SA at the time. This was during an SA upgrade, and
I believe it was a faulty install that caused this.
Our old database was running for years and is rather large ( I still
have copies ). The new one
Hi all,
Another query.. another busy SA day.
I have a piece of Spam that is getting through to one of our biggest
clients. I have written rules to tag this Spam, but it is as if it isn't
even being checked by Spamassassin.
I have checked our qmail control files to ensure we are spamchecking the
-Original Message-
From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2008 11:01 a.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamassassin not checking a particular Email.
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Hi all,
Another query
-Original Message-
From: D Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2008 12:23 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamassassin not checking a particular Email.
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 at 18:00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Michael Hutchinson
-Original Message-
From: Michael Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2008 1:09 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spamassassin not checking a particular Email.
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 at 18:00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
confabulated:
SNIP
up rewriting those rules every day
in favour of this one.
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson.
changes.
PS beware the forward and backslash characters, they will need to be
escaped with a single \ each.
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
for every other site,
antivirus checking, and spamassasssin checking are switched on, plus we
block the listed attachments outright.
Sorry if you don't run Simscan, just thought I'd post my $0.2
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
mail, like a mail server should.
Cheers
Michael Hutchinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have tried different approaches, and let us not forget I have
filled
out 3 whitelist forms, and received no response from Yahoo. Their
service
is breaking RFC's by not delivering mail. They are ignorant towards
other
companies trying to use their service.
But they do deliver the mail.
-Original Message-
From: jeco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 22 February 2008 1:55 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Installation on SpamAssassin
Hi to all members here, I'm a new member and would like to ask help on
how
to
install SpamAssassin? Aside
I've actually been running this set of 5 rules on several of the ISP
mail systems I've got my fingers in (watch for line wrap, sorry):
# Nice girl wants to send pics, but only if you email the address in
the body
# start scoring at .5, see how that whacks'em.
body NICE_GIRL_01
-Original Message-
From: Bazooka Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2008 11:22 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestions to block this spam
I too am getting dozens of these emails that are going right through
SA + pyzor + dcc.
-Original Message-
From: Tarak Ranjan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2008 1:24 a.m.
To: Spamassassin
Subject: How to Know
Hi List,
how do i come to know that each and every incoming outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
/
Tarak
Hmm. Is this Spam?
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2008 3:33 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Suggestions to block this spam
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 14:26 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
You'll be lucky to catch
-Original Message-
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
body NICE_GIRL_01 /Hello! I am (?:bored|tired) (?:today|this
(?:afternoon|evening)|tonight)\./
Forgive my ignorance, but what does the question mark and colon do
at
the start of the brackets? I have (bored|tired) in my own
-Original Message-
From: ItsMikeE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 18 February 2008 11:33 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Nice girl like to chat spam
For some time now I have been getting spams that look like
Hello! I am tired this evening. I am nice girl
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2008 4:43 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: user_prefs: mind the linebreak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MK Why would there ever be a problem fitting on
-Original Message-
For the most part you can match any character by the appearance of the
character. Any character with special meaning needs to be escaped in
some
way. The easiest way is usually with a backslash, but in some cases
you
can
also do it by making it a member of a
-Original Message-snipsnip
We don't want to only allow the English locale, because we (here
at
my work) do not want our international clients (non Russian) to be
denied email service.
ok_locales en ja ko th zh
This will allow anything but Cyrillic char sets. Please note that
-Original Message-
We're suddenly getting a ton of spam with koi8-r encoding...I
tried to
do a custom rule for it like this:
header SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR Subject =~/koi8-r/i
describe SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR has Russian char encoding
score SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR3.5
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 2:19 p.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Are we not meant
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 3:07 p.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Now what about matching a question mark and an equals sign
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 3:07 p.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Now what about matching a question mark and an equals sign
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 3:43 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:19 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
[...]
Does anyone have
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
