Re: [vchkpw] rcpt check patch - rejected rcpt

2006-05-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 22.53 22/05/2006, you wrote: Has anyone else run into this? A microsoft smtp service is sending an email with a list of rcpt's. Some of the rcpt's are invalid. The microsoft keeps reporting rejection of almost all the email addresses including valid ones. We are using fixcrio on the smtp

Re: [vchkpw] rcpt check patch - rejected rcpt

2006-05-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.11 23/05/2006, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 22.53 22/05/2006, you wrote: Has anyone else run into this? A microsoft smtp service is sending an email with a list of rcpt's. Some of the rcpt's are invalid. The microsoft keeps reporting rejection of almost all the email addresses

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser mystery

2006-05-19 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 19.28 19/05/2006, you wrote: I'm have a hell of a time tracking down why some of my user extensions won't work with chkuser. I'm running netqmail-1.05 with the qmail-toaster-0.8.1.patch from shupp.org and vpopmail-5.4.13 (on debian woody). Now, I have one .qmail-matt-default alias that

Re: [vchkpw] [vpopmail] handle 'postmaster' as non existing user (reject mails)

2006-05-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 16.47 09/05/2006, you wrote: Easiest thing to do is add a .qmail file in the postmaster directory stating '|/bin/true delete' to scrap the message [just sets it as deleted by default]. Now I'd imagine the main frontline you'd want to investigate is chkuser.c if you use it. By line 567,

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-10 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 02.15 10/03/2006, you wrote: #ifndef TLS This means that it will only run chkuser if you didn't compile it with TLS support, which you might have done. If TLS is defined, I don't see chkuser being included in the executable. You need the chkuser calls in the TLS/SSL section as well. This is

Re: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.13 09/03/2006, you wrote: Hi, I'm hoping somebody will be able to help me with a problem I appear to be having with chkuser 2.0. I built my qmail installation from the qmailrocks bundle, which I've done a few times in the past so I haven't had any problems there. I was looking for a

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.43 09/03/2006, you wrote: You should give more informations... Have you tried what's suggested in http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/faq /enabling.html ? Thank you for the response. Sorry about not providing enough information I have followed the

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 18.08 09/03/2006, you wrote: Did you try what's suggested in http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/faq, running manually qmail-smtpd? Did you check which is the user qmail-smtpd is running as? Tonino My qmail-smtpd is running through TCP Server as usver vpopmail

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 18.08 09/03/2006, you wrote: Did you try what's suggested in http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/faq, running manually qmail-smtpd? Did you check which is the user qmail-smtpd is running as? Tonino My qmail-smtpd is running through TCP Server as usver vpopmail

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 20.32 09/03/2006, you wrote: mail.leeevans.org If you compiled it with standard chkuser_settings.h, you should see some logs during this emulated session. I have doubts chkuser code is called. I have the same doubts. I have CHKUSER_ENABLE_LOGGING CHKUSER_LOG_VALID_RCPT and

Re: [vchkpw] I could not patch netqmail-1.05_chkuser-2.0.8.patch

2006-02-17 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.18 17/02/2006, you wrote: Well I have 10 domains. I want to check users for 3 domains. How can I set chkuser_settings.h that ? No need. Leave it as it is, and use qmailadmin to enable blouncing on the domains you want. Tonino Thanks - Original Message - From: Bob

Re: [vchkpw] Disabling CHKUSER via tcprules

2006-02-11 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 23.05 10/02/2006, you wrote: Hello List, I have searched this list, and Internet, but have no solutions. Anyway, here´s the question: Is there any way to disable CHKSUER for dertains IPs via tcprules? Yes. You must enable within chkuser_settings.h #define CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + smtp auth, disable CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT when correct smt auth. how??

2006-02-11 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 18.36 06/02/2006, you wrote: Hi, i have a working qmail installation from netqmail and recently included chkuser (very nice!). I want to use the CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT and CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT variables to block spam because they work very nice in my system, but the problem is that i don't want

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + smtp auth, disable CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT when correct smt auth. how??

2006-02-11 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 12.06 11/02/2006, you wrote: I'll publish this feature in next chkuser version (and rewrite the code in order to make it more easy and powerful - i.e. to make CHKUSER_EXCLUDE_VARIABLE indipendent from other variables). And mainly I'll take care to call it CHKUSER_DISABLE_VARIABLE anywhere

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + smtp auth, disable CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT when correct smt auth. how??

2006-02-06 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
see how add something like what you ask. I'm just wondering if other checks could be excluded for authenticathed users. Any comment is welcome. Tonino On 2/6/06, tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 18.36 06/02/2006, you wrote: Hi, i have a working qmail installation from netqmail

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + smtp auth, disable CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT when correct smt auth. how??

2006-02-06 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 20.57 06/02/2006, you wrote: Ibiltari wrote: Thanks for your answer Tonino, i take that solution in account but i would prefer another solution if possible, that smtp server is being already used by lots of clients so running another server for them would imply that they have to change their

Re: [vchkpw] MySQL going down results in 5xx error

2006-01-28 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 21.30 27/01/2006, you wrote: #if defined CHKUSER_ENABLE_VAUTH_OPEN if (db_already_open != 1) { if (CHKUSER_VAUTH_OPEN_CALL () == 0) { db_already_open == 1; } else { retstat = CHKUSER_ERR_AUTH_RESOURCE; } }; #endif Minor Bug: you nead a break; on the line after retstat = ...,

Re: [vchkpw] MySQL going down results in 5xx error

2006-01-28 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 20.18 27/01/2006, you wrote: Yes, here are changes. I've already tried them and it works. Just studying the name of calls it may be adapted to Postgres also (it should be enough to use vauth_open() ). In chkuser_settings.h enable #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_VAUTH_OPEN and add one of the

Re: [vchkpw] MySQL going down results in 5xx error

2006-01-27 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 15.15 25/01/2006, you wrote: If you are using chkuser, there is a small change you can do (I'm going to publish nextly this change with next version of chkuser). If you are interested I'll anticipate this small change so it may help people to handle this error. Can you post the change

Re: [vchkpw] Quota Checking

2005-12-05 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 05.10 05/12/2005, you wrote: I have installed the latest version of the toaster. It works wonderfully, I have also installed Matts mysql relay patch. However I cannot seem to get chkuser to actually deny mail based upon Quota checking. I believe that I need to define a variable in the run

Re: [vchkpw] Problem chkuser

2005-11-24 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 14.46 24/11/2005, you wrote: Hi, Fairly new to Qmail here. Just trying to find my way around. I've come across multiple problems after setting it up. So let me start with one of the more simple ones. On my Outlook, I have a distribution list of 40 people. All addresses are internal addresses.

Re: [vchkpw] recompile or not

2005-11-08 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 05.54 08/11/2005, you wrote: On Nov 7, 2005, at 8:15 AM, Nicholas Harring wrote: Please, please, please don't spread FUD by even implicitly blaming chkuser for this. There's no way to implement chkuser in even a vaguely efficient manner without linking against vpopmail. Vpopmail needs to

Re: [vchkpw] 571 Errors

2005-09-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Yes, the value is within an environment variable. See your chkuser_settings.h to see how you called the variable and change the variable's value. Tonino At 17.24 23/09/2005, you wrote: Hello, I am having some problems whenever people try to send to more than 15 people in the same email. They

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-22 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
/vpopmail/etc/vlimits.default and in your domain .qmailadmin-limits (or in your MySQL limits). Tonino At 23.05 21/09/2005, you wrote: Im not really suer what flags you are aiming for tonix. But i guess they could be enabled/disabled? Aleks On 9/21/05, tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-22 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
corrected about the hole auth and no tls security breach jms pointed out. If you want auth you should use tls i guess. Thanks, /Aleks On 9/22/05, John Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2005-09-21, at 0623, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Why are you running it with -u $QMAILDUID ? You should

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-22 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.34 22/09/2005, you wrote: On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:42 AM, John Simpson wrote: if you're supporting AUTH, you really should use TLS as well. otherwise you're allowing your users to send their passwords across the internet in plain text- and all it takes is one spammer with a packet sniffer

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-21 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
-smtpd.c, compiled fine - but no-go. Wont auth. Anyone notice anything i might have missed out? This hoffman patch -should- work with a vpopmail/mysql setup right? Thanks! /Aleksander On 9/20/05, tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11.51 20/09/2005, you wrote: Tried to patch up a clean

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-21 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 11.56 21/09/2005, you wrote: - Now, it seems the patch didnt like working with auth-jms1.4a.patch(auth patch) and/or qmail-1.03-jms1.5.patch (tls patch). I got the auth patch from the vpopmail contrib dir and tried with that, leaving the ones mentioned above out of it and then patched

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-21 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
! /Aleksander On 9/20/05, tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11.51 20/09/2005, you wrote: Tried to patch up a clean src of qmail-1.03. I get the same error as I get with the already patched up src. Hope this is right. Yes. How did you define CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE within

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-20 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 11.26 20/09/2005, you wrote: Hi, Trying to patch up an already auth+tls+spf patched qmail-smtpd and seems i hit a rock and hoping for some guidance. I followed the manual patch guide at http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/installation/manual.html and think I

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-20 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
/05, tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11.26 20/09/2005, you wrote: Hi, Trying to patch up an already auth+tls+spf patched qmail-smtpd and seems i hit a rock and hoping for some guidance. I followed the manual patch guide at http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and chkuser

2005-09-15 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 09.25 15/09/2005, you wrote: hi all from the chkuser website: External database libraries used by vpopmail are automatically integrated. does this mean that i have to reinstall qmail-smtpd+chkuser after a vpopmail upgrade? Yes, recompile and reinstall (as far as I know vpopmail

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser vpopmail and catch alls

2005-09-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 08.26 14/09/2005, you wrote: * Uncomment the following define if you want chkuser ALWAYS enabled. * If uncommented, it will check for rcpt existance despite any .qmail-default * setting. * So, unsomments this if you are aware that ALL rcpt in all domains will be * ALWAYS checked.

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser vpopmail and catch alls

2005-09-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 10.58 14/09/2005, you wrote: Hello, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 08.26 14/09/2005, you wrote: * Uncomment the following define if you want chkuser ALWAYS enabled. * If uncommented, it will check for rcpt existance despite any .qmail-default * setting. * So, unsomments

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser vpopmail and catch alls

2005-09-13 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 09.50 13/09/2005, you wrote: Hello, Ken Jones wrote: Jimmy wrote: Hello, I have several servers installed with vpopmail, chkuser and the shupp.org toaster patches. Until now I have never had to setup a catch all account for a customer. I have today had to setup a catch all and i am

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser vpopmail and catch alls

2005-09-13 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
See following comments. At 12.53 13/09/2005, you wrote: Here is my chkuser_settings file : ==SNIP== /* * /* * Uncomment the following define if you want chkuser ALWAYS enabled. * If uncommented, it will check for rcpt existance despite any .qmail-default * setting. * So, unsomments

Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+chkuser problems

2005-09-10 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 23.45 09/09/2005, you wrote: Greetings, I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I have copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving any errors adding domains, adding

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-07-27 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 18.58 26/07/2005, you wrote: If it works telnetting to port 25, then it should work from anywhere, as the protocol is the same and the programs are the same. What are logs saying about rejected/lost messages? The logs say nothing. Is there any chkuser log in /var/log/maillog (or

Re: [vchkpw] Why does Inter7 opt Qmail?

2005-07-05 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
There are a lot of us here using qmail and able to give you an e-mail service. So you can continue to use qmail and your boss will have an outsourced service! Ciao, Tonino At 15.29 05/07/2005, you wrote: Guys, let me explain why I'm asking this. My boss (not me) has doubts about Qmail. He

Re: [vchkpw] pop-before-smtp and chkuser

2005-07-01 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
There is no need to change the code... Once you've enabled #define CHKUSER_RCPT_LIMIT_VARIABLE CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT it's enought you declare this variable CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT with the limit you want before running qmail-smtpd. So add a export CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50 before running

Re: [vchkpw] SENDER_NOCHECK Question

2005-06-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 22.35 22/06/2005, you wrote: Does SENDER_NOCHECK=1 in tcp.smtp mean that all aspects of chkuser get bypassed when coming from that specific IP? No. It means that no check is done on sender e-mail address (formal check on address). I've been trying to implement this feature and having trouble

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-20 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 18.36 17/06/2005, you wrote: Hi Tonino, thanks for answering. Documentation says it works with ezmlm and mailman. Please, read the documentation! Tonino Dude, let me tell you: I ran a 'find ezmlm' in your whole website and the only matches I found were these statements (shown bellow)

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 15.49 17/06/2005, you wrote: But now I looking closely to this check I'm recalling some of my customers like to have e-mails of the format: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I't seems that this check would block my usernames with the 'user.lastname' syntax, since it doesn't accept a '.' character in the

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 16.47 17/06/2005, you wrote: Tonino, are these characters enough even in those cases when somebody wants to, for example, send a confirmation reply e-mail to some automatic procedure? Like, confirming a subscribe message for a mailing list or something like that. How were your tests?

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser patch causes problems with qmails sendmail binary

2005-06-06 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
What you see is chkuser logging, that is handled correctly is you send using smtp port. So, you can either disable chkuser logging or send using smtp local port. Ciao, Tonino At 20.17 04/06/2005, you wrote: Ever since I installed chkuser (which has been great, might I add), pine has had

Re: [vchkpw] [chkuser] qutoacheck with catchall accounts

2005-05-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
No, it is not possible. Let's say quotacheck is an option of chkuser, and if you disable chkuser quotacheck will not work. You are suggesting a nice feature to add, I'll put in my to do list. Tonino At 22.33 22/05/2005, you wrote: Hi, i'm using netqmail 1.05 with

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 + syslog

2005-05-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 08.23 19/05/2005, you wrote: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c120 -u89 -g89 0 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -v -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r dnsbl.sorbs.net -r relays.ordb.org -r rhsbl.sorbs.net -r list.dsbl.org -r bl.spamcop.net /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 |

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 + syslog

2005-05-18 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 08.52 18/05/2005, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 17.59 17/05/2005, you wrote: On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Hi Jimmy, this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail problem (as chkuser uses same logging routines of qmail). chkuser

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 + syslog

2005-05-18 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 10.48 18/05/2005, you wrote: I currently have no problems with email logging. I have also got the rblsmtpd syslogd patch working its only the chkuser stuff that does not end up in syslog. This is my configuration for qmail-smtpd. It logs everything (chkuser included). I don't use supervise,

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 + syslog

2005-05-17 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Hi Jimmy, this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail problem (as chkuser uses same logging routines of qmail). chkuser log goes whenever qmail logs go. Are your normal qmail-smtpd logs going to syslog? You should look in other pages, and check how syslog and splogger work.

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 + syslog

2005-05-17 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.59 17/05/2005, you wrote: On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Hi Jimmy, this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail problem (as chkuser uses same logging routines of qmail). chkuser log goes whenever qmail logs go. Are your normal qmail-smtpd

RE: [vchkpw] Re: Getting segmentation fault with chkusr patch for qmail-smtpd

2005-04-29 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
How did you apply the patch over qmailrocks installation? Did you have any error from patch? You should at least examine smtp_rcpt and post it. Ciao, Tonino At 22.44 28/04/2005, you wrote: *exactly*? Compile qmail without and '-O' and with '-g2' and run qmail-smtpd in 'dbg' (or similar). Use

Re: [vchkpw] (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug !!!!!!!!!

2005-04-19 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
You may disable acceptance of message from not authenticated users only if you make one of these changes: - delete any entry from rcpthosts or - modify auth patch so that only auth relaying is allowed. Tonino At 16.24 19/04/2005, you wrote: Hi Everybody, I have a system consists of qmail 1.03

RE: [vchkpw] (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug !!!!!!!!!

2005-04-19 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 16.42 19/04/2005, you wrote: -Original Message- From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 5:24 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug ! You may disable acceptance of message from

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Abuse

2005-04-13 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
If remote user is sending using an authenticated SMTP session, you would find his name within chkuser logging. Probably, as Ken is saying, are simply some viruses trying to guess recipients on your MX hosted domains. Tonino At 19.24 13/04/2005, you wrote: Ken, Thanks for your help. You

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser: Let chkuser kill qmail-smtpd

2005-03-30 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Hi Tobias, I don't think that quitting qmail-smtpd is the best action. When you enable these thresholds settings and enable delay, chkuser simply aborts further rcpt to: with the message you see, and for each new rcpt waits for CHKUSER_ERROR_DELAY (default 1000) milliseconds, increased, for each

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 oddities

2005-03-16 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote: Good morning, I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in valias and work fine when I send a message. The user in question is recently getting rejections. Here is

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 oddities

2005-03-16 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Sorry for the previous message, this is indented better. At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote: Good morning, I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in valias and work fine when I send a message. The

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 oddities

2005-03-16 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 19.21 16/03/2005, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote: Good morning, I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in valias and work fine when I send a message

Re: [vchkpw] 551 response to user not found

2005-03-15 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
I don't remember exactly, I studied a lot of documents and found same tables that lead me to that decision (to have a close correspondence to 5.x.x formats). These are all definitions within chkuser_settings.h #define CHKUSER_NORCPT_STRING 511 sorry, no mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1 -

Re: [vchkpw] 551 response to user not found

2005-03-15 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
(#5.5.3 - chkuser)\r\n I feel #define CHKUSER_RESOURCE_STRING 430 system temporary unavailable, try again later (#4.3.0 - chkuser)\r\n is probably ok as it is. Tonino At 13.48 15/03/2005, you wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:22:34 +0100, tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ciao Antonio, first

Re: [vchkpw] 551 response to user not found

2005-03-15 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
(in settings file) to let anyone chose own best behaviours. Tonino At 14.06 15/03/2005, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: #define CHKUSER_MBXFULL_STRING 522 sorry, recipient mailbox is full (#5.2.2 - chkuser)\r\n #define CHKUSER_RCPTMX_STRING 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for rcpt domain

Re: [vchkpw] Removing entries from vlog with user/domain deleted

2005-01-21 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.08 21/01/2005, you wrote: On Thursday 20 January 2005 9:43 pm, Tom Collins wrote: secnetdk submitted the following patch on SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/? func=detailatid=577800aid=1099800group_id=85937 It adds code to delete the associated vlog entries when a user or

RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-20 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.47 20/01/2005, you wrote: So based on what you have said, if chkuser relies on vpopmail commands to determine existence then my current setup should work just fine. If chkuser directly reads the virtualdomains file, then I will have problems. Hi Brian, chkuser relies on vpopmail for domains

Re: [vchkpw] qmail-default, bounce and reply

2005-01-19 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
I can't say for the qmailrocks version, in standard chkuser 2.0.8 you have new defines that may help you. CHKUSER_ENABLE_ALIAS_DEFAULT Enables checking of .qmail-alias-default files You may try to keep your patched qmail-smtpd.c and copy newer chkuser.h, chkuser_settings.h, chkuser.c, then

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
I feel these two statements are not in opposition. chkuser checks recipients only for domains who are in virtualdomains. When a domain is already inside virtualdomains, for a new user you may simply add a new line with MySQL vpopmail database, and the user will be added automatically as it is

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 10.17 14/01/2005, you wrote: I feel these two statements are not in opposition. chkuser checks recipients only for domains who are in virtualdomains. When a domain is already inside virtualdomains, for a new user you may simply add a new line with MySQL vpopmail database, and the user will be

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw problemm!

2004-12-10 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Are you testing as root? If yes, it should work... If not, you should setuid and setgid qmail-smtpd as indicated in documentation. Tonino At 15.43 10/12/2004, you wrote: Hello all! i install netqmail-1.05 qmail-toaster-0.6-1.patch netqmail-1.05_toaster-0.6-1_chkuser-2.0.8b.patch and have a

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw problemm!

2004-12-10 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Hi, watching better your post. If you are using Shupp's toaster, you must run qmail-smtpd as vpopmail user, not qmail (see documentation). You may also comment CHKUSER_ENABLE_UIDGID. Tonino At 15.43 10/12/2004, you wrote: Hello all! i install netqmail-1.05 qmail-toaster-0.6-1.patch

[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 released again - 2.0.8a

2004-12-08 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
A damned typing error in chkuser.c gives compile error when #define CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE is defined. You may download 2.0.8a, or change, in chkuser.c, this line: if (strùcasecmp(starting_string, ALWAYS) == 0) { to if (strcasecmp(starting_string, ALWAYS) == 0) { Sorry for any

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.7 released

2004-12-07 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
) { return CHKUSER_OK; } #endif #if defined CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT || defined CHKUSER_SENDER_MX - if (first_time_init_flag) { - first_time_init (); - } #if defined CHKUSER_SENDER_NOCHECK_VARIABLE Thanks, Tonino At 01.44 07/12/2004, you wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Patch

[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 released

2004-12-07 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
chkuser 2.0.8 has been released, and is available at www.interazioni.it/opensource. As usual, this version has been tested and is now working on my production systems since some weeks. This version, basically: freeze all important changes in 2.0.7 (closing DB connections among all) is more

Re: [vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....

2004-11-25 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 18.34 24/11/2004, you wrote: On Wednesday 24 November 2004 04:17 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: CORRECTION TO THE PREVIOUS MESSAGE. CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER is in 2.0.7. This version may be considered stable, despite of its devel attribute. I tried to use it.. looks like I need

Re: [vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....

2004-11-24 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Jeremy, you should add also CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER. When CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT or CHKUSER_SENDER_MX are defined, CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER will exclude NULL SENDERS from those checkings. This is the new default in the last distributions, after CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER has been added:

Re: [vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....

2004-11-24 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
CORRECTION TO THE PREVIOUS MESSAGE. CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER is in 2.0.7. This version may be considered stable, despite of its devel attribute. On next days I'll publish a 2.0.8 release, and update online documentation. 2.0.8 that will probably be the definitive stable chkuser, with the most

Re: [vchkpw] 2.0.7 not correctly working?

2004-10-27 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Alastair, main difference between 2.0.5 and 2.0.7, speaking only about sender checking, is related to NULL SENDER (), now accepted by default, while previously it was accepted only if its IP had a corresponding DNS name. This (default) change makes more messages accepted. Can you check if you

Re: [vchkpw] MySql load causes bounced mail

2004-10-27 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 25/10/2004 25/10/2004 -0400, you wrote: I feel it could be time to redesign qmail and use atexit() functions. This could be a lengthy process. But if you are willing to undertake it, and write the patches for it, then it is certainly worth it. I'm willing to do it, but I've no time shortly.

Re: [vchkpw] 2.0.7 not correctly working? [SEMI SOLVED]

2004-10-27 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 27/10/2004 27/10/2004 +0100, you wrote: I've discovered the problem with this. Using MAIL FROM without the colon, results in a null sender. This bit of code in chkuser.c accepts the email address as it is null: ... In chkuser 2.0.5 ommiting the colon would have been picked up with a

[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.7 released

2004-10-26 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
chkuser 2.0.7, development version, is now available on the site (www.interazioni.it/opensource). This is an important version, because a lot of bugs have been solved and a lot of new features have been added. But, most of all, this is the first version caring to close all DB connections, and

Re: [vchkpw] MySql load causes bounced mail

2004-10-25 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 22/10/2004 22/10/2004 -0400, you wrote: On Oct 22, 2004, at 8:13 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Any comment? Tonino Why is qMail calling _exit() and not exit()? Is there a reason it does not want its files closed, and other stuff properly cleaned up? Or is it because DJB is just not happy

Re: [vchkpw] MySql load causes bounced mail

2004-10-22 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 21/10/2004 21/10/2004 -0700, you wrote: vdelivermail calls _exit() when running a command in a .qmail file (exit codes 99, 100 and 111). It should really be calling vexit() to give the MySQL lib a chance to close its connections. We could also consider just using atexit() to register

Re: [vchkpw] MySql load causes bounced mail

2004-10-21 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 21/10/2004 21/10/2004 -0700, you wrote: We could also consider just using atexit() to register functions that will be automatically called at exit, then we don't have to worry about calling vexit instead (which calls vclose). Wow! In another thread I just suggested to use atexit() in

Re: [vchkpw] MySql load causes bounced mail

2004-10-21 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 21/10/2004 21/10/2004 +0100, you wrote: But, as we are speaking of atexit(), I'll give the good example ( :-) ) and in next 2.0.7 version I'll use it to call vclose(). As another thread is saying, qmail-smtpd also is using _exit(), so atexit() is useless. I'll put another solution to work.

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser and SSL with stunnel

2004-10-16 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 16/10/2004 16/10/2004 +0200, you wrote: I think the problem is, that qmail-smtpd is called by a wrapper program (stunnel here) and chkuser sends log-messages to stdout when called directly (logging enabled in this example): chkuser sends log messages using qmail routines (that should use

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Eric, we are waiting for the release of this feature, that should already be in CVS. See this previous message: Charles Sprickman wrote: Take a look at vpopmail CVS HEAD. What I did was add a vauth_open() function in vmysql.c, and every other authentication back end that did not already have

[vchkpw] Safe closing of DB connections - it was Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 14/10/2004 14/10/2004 -0500, you wrote: Several people, myself included, are still seeing problems with MySQL under a large useage. So far I have not been able to get to the cause of the problem other than to convince myself I have no network or MySQL issues. I don't know C well enough to

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-13 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 13/10/2004 13/10/2004 -0500, you wrote: as a suggestion, would it be possible to have a definition placed into vpopmail.h such as: #define HAVE_VAUTH_OPEN that way programs that link against vpopmail can support both methods without any user intervention, and also this way, if say perhaps

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser starting variable not working

2004-10-13 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 13/10/2004 13/10/2004 -0700, you wrote: Hello all, I am having a problem with getting the CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE to work with my system. When I use this setting when compiling qmail chkuser doesn't work at all. However when I use the CHKUSER_ALWAYS_ON it works fine. Did you enable bouncing

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser starting variable not working

2004-10-13 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 13/10/2004 13/10/2004 -0700, you wrote: Hello all, I am having a problem with getting the CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE to work with my system. When I use this setting when compiling qmail chkuser doesn't work at all. However when I use the CHKUSER_ALWAYS_ON it works fine. #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`id

Re: [vchkpw] Integration with maildrop as default deliver?

2004-10-08 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
You could try keeping commented as first line in .qmail-default the same line usually written by qmailadmin inside .qmail-default when bouncing is enabled. Or you could use chkuser patch, enabling it always or adding a commented line, containing bounce-no-mailbox to .qmail-default (see

Re: [vchkpw] SIMSCAN

2004-09-28 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 27/09/2004 27/09/2004 -0300, you wrote: i am running simscan with vpopmail user. I feel you should run simscan as qmaild user, as vpopmail user cannot write in qmail spool archives. but when i set the QMAILQUEUE to simscan i receive this message. (unable to exec qq) That should be the reason:

Re: [vchkpw] SIMSCAN working directory privs

2004-09-28 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 28/09/2004 28/09/2004 +0200, you wrote: Simscan creates the working directory with a privilege of 700. in this way clamd must run with the same owner of simscan to access the msg. They work on the same files (and only on those files), so why should they have different users? I feel this

Re: [vchkpw] mail from patch

2004-09-27 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
-mail headers (if you're using autenticated smtp). Tonino can you understand - me ? - Original Message - From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 2:33 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] mail from patch You could also set up an authenticated

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 - doc typos

2004-09-24 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
sending to who a who's sending to whom Ciao, Remo - Original Message - From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:16 PM Subject: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 chkuser 2.0 has been released. New version is available on: http

[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-09-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
chkuser 2.0 has been released. New version is available on: http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser. These are the most evident changes: - new design, a lot more easy to install and update - extended logging - flexible and powerful tarpitting - quota checking

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-09-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 23/09/2004 23/09/2004 -0400, you wrote: I didn't see anything in the docs or change logs specifically regarding the mysql connection problem that sometimes crops up with vpopmail. Has this been addressed ? Yes, chkuser 2.0 includes a new call, vauth_open(), that Rick Widmer told is in

Re: [vchkpw] troubleshooting chkusr

2004-09-05 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Are all .qmail-default rsynced? Has been rcpthosts amd morercpthosts copied as well? You can out a printf - out() - at the beginning of each case, and after the rcpthosts checking, and see what's happening. Tonino At 04/09/2004 04/09/2004 -0400, you wrote: On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, tonix (Antonio Nati

Re: [vchkpw] troubleshooting chkusr

2004-09-03 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
chkusr is not working because it can't read .qmail-default, so, or chkusr is not running as vpopmail, or .qmail-default is not readable by vpopmail users. It means you're running qmail-smtpd on the secondary server with different uid/gid/privileges. Tonino At 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 -0400, you

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser patch

2004-07-11 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Jeremy, pls switch to private, as I need more info on serial mail. Tonino At 11/07/2004 11/07/2004 -0400, you wrote: On Wednesday, July 07, 2004 5:32 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I'm preparing chkuser 2.0, that will integrate all these changes, and will improve a lot of other things. Hi

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser patch

2004-07-08 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 07/07/2004 07/07/2004 -0400, you wrote: There's some larger issue here that involves a moderately loaded machine running both mysql and qmail (and incidentally, vpopmail) having trouble getting some sql queries out in time. The mysql people (mostly Zawodny) don't think it's a bug/problem with

<    1   2   3   >