Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 12:07 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
Baiju M wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2007, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
David Pratt wrote:
Any idea what is happening with the site?
Getting distribution for zope.app.zptpage Error: Can't
Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 00:03 -0700 schrieb Leonardo Rochael:
I've reopened 98111 because it doesn't deal with the situation where the
collection is empty, i.e. when the user didn't select any of the options in
the collection widgets.
Can I check the newly attached patch to the bug into
Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 20:03 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Christian Theune wrote:
The eggs are released now.
Cool, thanks! I'll try this out.
Note that I see -3.4.tar.gz released 11 april, as well as 3.4.0a1
tarballs released yesterday. What are those 3.4 release eggs doing
Am Samstag, den 21.04.2007, 22:20 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Hi there,
I have some questions about the Zope 3.4 release. My apologies if this
information is already available somewhere else.
I've just uploaded z3c.widget to download.zope.org/distribution, but ran
into a new snag: it
Hi,
I took Martin's script and adapted it for this release.
I took the listing of download.zope.org and gathered the names of all
eggs that were available as 3.4dev eggs and am currently creating
3.4.0a1 eggs for those.
It might be that these are not all eggs that should be build.
However,
, but I'll
do that later today.
Christian
Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2007, 12:38 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I took Martin's script and adapted it for this release.
I took the listing of download.zope.org and gathered the names of all
eggs that were available as 3.4dev eggs and am currently
Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2007, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
David Pratt wrote:
Any idea what is happening with the site?
Getting distribution for zope.app.zptpage
Error: Can't download
http://download.zope.org/distribution/zope.app.zptpage-3.4.0a1.tar.gz:
403 Forbidden
That
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 20.04.2007, 16:25 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Hey,
Compatibility with Zope 2
--
We continue to work on the transition from Zope 2 to Zope 3 by making
Zope 2 use more and more of the Zope 3 packages. But we're not there
yet. **You
That was a spurious ZEO error.
Am Samstag, den 21.04.2007, 06:08 -0400 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches 3.3 2.4 Linux remy.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 187
Blamelist:
Hmm. Up until now those failures where spurious on my machine. I'm
somewhat happy those turned up.
Jim mentioned to me those would be problems with exit handlers in the
test runner, however one testrunner that was breaking on my machine
didn't get fixed by switching to `os._exit()` :/
Am
Hi,
(moving it to zope3-dev for discussion)
Am Samstag, den 21.04.2007, 13:50 + schrieb Jim Fulton:
On Apr 21, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
*sigh*
This is a can of worms. It looks like email.FeedParser.FeedParser is
probably what we want to use.
Why?
Ah. I
Am Samstag, den 21.04.2007, 19:12 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Hey,
Anyone, can I conclude that z3c.widget is not available anywhere? Who
would like to upload a version? Can I help? Where shall we upload it?
You should be able to make an sdist and scp it to
Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2007, 05:59 -0400 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 124
Blamelist: ctheune,schwendinger,zagy
:(
I see those
contributed to this release:
Jim Fulton, Dmitry Vasiliev, Martijn Faassen, Christian Theune,
Wolfgang Schnerring, Fred Drake, Marius Gedminas, Baiju M, Brian
Sutherland, Gary Poster
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2007, 17:31 +0300 schrieb Ignas Mikalajunas:
Hi, I have accidentally tried upgrading from Zope3.3 branch checkout
to Zop3.4 eggs, and it seems that at least:
include package=zope.app /
instead of throwing a deprecation warning (the way switching to
Zope3.4
Ok,
those two tests only break on my notebook, but not on a pretty similar
second machine.
I tried rebuilding with a clean Python (2.4.4) but it keeps breaking.
Any hints or ideas?
Christian
Am Samstag, den 14.04.2007, 10:19 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
More test breakage:
Running
Hi,
I tried to make a (test) release today and fixed some broken zpkg
things.
I'm currently stalled at a point where I can create a release, but
twisted seems missing. I don't have much zpkg-knowledge and I can't find
out why it's missing.
Can anybody jump in?
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co.
Hey,
Am Montag, den 16.04.2007, 09:58 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:51 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently
to make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really
excited me. It would be *great* with
Hi,
I'm working on the 3.4 alpha release today. When running _all_ tests, I
found this unit test to fail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Development/Zope-3.4a1 $ python test.py --all
Running unit tests:
Failure in test testStandalone (zope.component.tests.StandaloneTests)
Traceback (most recent call
More test breakage:
Running zope.app.workflow.testing.AppWorkflowLayer tests:
Running in a subprocess.
Set up zope.app.workflow.testing.AppWorkflowLayer in 1.290 seconds.
Ran 5 tests with 0 failures and 0 errors in 0.720 seconds.
Tear down zope.app.workflow.testing.AppWorkflowLayer in
in the
branches seem unreliable.
I propose to start make the clients do nightly builds. Also, do we have
someone who is the official 'client nagging guy' to remind people when
their buildbot clients die?
Christian
Am Samstag, den 14.04.2007, 10:19 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
More test
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 14.04.2007, 08:06 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
Christian Theune wrote:
I noticed that the buildbots have not run a successfull Zope 3 trunk
build since March 25. :(
The only builder that is configured to run the trunk and is currently
on-line is zc-buildbot
Hi,
we're starting work on an application that we're going to use Zope 3.4
for and that I'd like to base on the eggs. That should give me the
chance to clean up some of the egg dependencies.
First thing that I found: ZODB 3.4 eggs just require ZODB3, but don't
state a version. This should
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2007, 11:12 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
New bugs can be filed at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+filebug
Users can view their personal bugs at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/~USER
Using the menu on the left, they can pick between assigned, reported
and
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2007, 21:37 +0300 schrieb Marius Gedminas:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:31:12PM +0200, Adam Groszer wrote:
I'm trying to catch somehow the exception that's coming when the SMTP
server IP address is misconfigured or the SMTP server is not
responding.
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 28.03.2007, 18:05 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Hey Christian,
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.03.2007, 01:12 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
[snip]
Quick shot on integrating the suggestion from Uwe:
- Reserve an OID from the ZODB storage, maybe
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 28.03.2007, 01:12 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Uwe Oestermeier wrote:
Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
Now I'm hoping I'm missing some kind of strategy and perhaps someone
will have a luminous idea to make this work
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 23.03.2007, 04:15 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On 3/23/07, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we need not to mimic the zpkg based release for 3.4, rather we
should use zpkg for this release also.
...
- our 3.4 alpha 1 release date is approaching, we follow
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 23.03.2007, 14:00 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
Hi,
(Please correct me, if I am wrong)
All eggs of a particular release will be available from :
http://download.zope.org/distribution/zope3/ . Here is some future
locations:
3.4.0 - distribution/zope3/3.4.0
3.4.1 -
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 23.03.2007, 14:43 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
I think putting all eggs in one place for each release will be useful
for those who make
offline installation/deploy. So they can easily make use the
'download-cache' and 'install-from-cache'
options of zc.buildout without any
Am Freitag, den 23.03.2007, 08:41 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Minor note:
No one is talking about mimicking a zpkg release. The plan was to
switch from using zpkg to eggs to create releases. Unfortunately, I
don't think we have time to do this now, although I think we are
getting
Yikes.
The failure I see wasn changed recently. Is it possible the buildbot
farm just recovered and now detects errors that have slipped in?
Christian
Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2007, 23:40 -0400 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches 3.2 2.4
Hi,
I haven't had time to look at your code yet. You might want to check svn
in Zope3.buildout where we started working towards a Zope 3 release
mechanism that builds purely from eggs.
Also, the wiki has a proposal that mentions various issues.
Christian
Am Montag, den 19.03.2007, 14:41 +0530
Hi,
this definitely invites for some biased commenting. ;)
Am Montag, den 12.03.2007, 16:48 +0100 schrieb Godefroid Chapelle:
Hi all,
We have the opportunity to bid for a project concerning
the automation of administrative processes.
The client currently has software in Python and
Am Montag, den 12.03.2007, 12:16 -0400 schrieb Kapil Thangavelu:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:48:24 -0400, Godefroid Chapelle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
We have the opportunity to bid for a project concerning
the automation of administrative processes.
The client currently has
Hi,
we (Jim, Nathan, Michael and me) did some planning on how we're going to
release Zope 3.4 and the future Zope 3 releases that are based on eggs.
I tried to catch up and did my writing here:
http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/DefiningZope34Release
There is also a project in the repository in
, at 9:57 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
[modified slightly from a similar proposal to zope3-dev to match Zope
2's publisher]
I'm writing up a proposal for the ZODB to make even more efficient
Blob
handling possible.
This includes not copying
Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2007, 01:30 -0300 schrieb Sidnei da Silva:
On 3/7/07, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose to create a small subclass to override the `make_file` method
to use `NamedTemporaryFile` instead of `TemporaryFile` to allow the file
being accessible from
Hi,
Am Montag, den 05.03.2007, 07:10 -0800 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 5 Mar 2007, at 09:48 , Christian Theune wrote:
I've added myself too.
Thanks.
I'd be interested in having some ZODB problem,
although I'd like not to put the 'clean up
Hi,
I'm writing up a proposal for the ZODB to make even more efficient Blob
handling possible.
This includes not copying the data from an uploaded file, but using a
`link` operation when possible.
However, the Zope 3 publisher currently uses the default implementation
of the cgi module's
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 11:55 -0500 schrieb Stephan Richter:
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 11:37, Christian Theune wrote:
Does anybody feel like this would be a bad idea?
As long as you do not monkey patch the existing code, this is totally fine.
*k*
No. I was talking about doing
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 08:03 -0800 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
Christian Theune-2 wrote:
It's on the ZODB trunk already for a while. The current trunk is going
to be ZODB 3.8 and was already released as an alpha. And it will be the
ZODB that ships with Zope 2.11
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 20:50 +0100 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
Christian Theune wrote at 2007-3-7 17:37 +0100:
I'm writing up a proposal for the ZODB to make even more efficient Blob
handling possible.
This includes not copying the data from an uploaded file, but using a
`link` operation
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 21:03 +0100 schrieb Bernd Dorn:
On 07.03.2007, at 17:37, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing up a proposal for the ZODB to make even more efficient
Blob
handling possible.
This includes not copying the data from an uploaded file, but using
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 21:31 +0100 schrieb Uwe Oestermeier:
Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
Nope. It won't disappear if you link it again. And the link(src, dst)
does move it to a 'save' location ;)
Again I'm not convinced because you cannot be sure that no other process
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 21:37 +0100 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
Christian Theune wrote at 2007-3-7 21:17 +0100:
...
Nope. It won't disappear if you link it again. And the link(src, dst)
does move it to a 'save' location ;)
You do not tell us, which link you mean.
Sorry. I mean
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 15:59 -0500 schrieb Benji York:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Python's os.link creates a hard link which will only work
if source and destination are on the same file system.
...and is also not available on Windows.
Hrn. I tried to point you all to the upcoming
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 22:04 +0100 schrieb Uwe Oestermeier:
Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
Nope this is not the correct simulation. Who except your application
knows about /tmp/asdf? You have to simulate deleting d.name and then
you'll see that /tmp/asdf does not disappear
Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2007, 00:32 +0100 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 21:31 +0100 schrieb Uwe Oestermeier:
Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
Nope. It won't disappear if you link it again. And the link(src, dst
I can't reproduce them on my 3.3 checkout either.
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 08:54 -0800 schrieb Ross Patterson:
Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hoi
the Zope 3.3 branch tests fail here:
Error in test test_persistentDeclarations
Hi,
I've added myself too. I'd be interested in having some ZODB problem,
although I'd like not to put the 'clean up the interfaces' burden onto a
student project that ought to be interesting.
Christian
Am Montag, den 05.03.2007, 08:13 -0500 schrieb Philipp von
Weitershausen:
Sidnei da Silva
Hi,
we're hiring. Just in case someone isn't reading the German lists or is
interested to work in Germany, gocept is hiring.
The German job description is here:
https://members.zope.de/Members/ctheune/softwareentwickler-m-w/
(Note that the *ideal* candidate speaks German, but we might like you
Hi,
here's the pattern that we use:
- create a directory 'profiles/' in your buildout
- create a file 'profiles/base.cfg' that describes all parts and their
default configurations
- create a file 'profiles/dev.cfg' that has the development variation
and uses '[buildout] extends=base.cfg'
Then
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 20:28 +0100 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2007-1-15 17:25 -0200:
...
The kind of info I'm looking for is something along the lines:
'We've tried to look up an adapter for (ISomething, ITheOther) but
none was found'
'Found an adapter
Hi,
I was updating one of the proposals in this minutes and had a somewhat
hard time to define a goal. I stumbled over the upcoming problem of
defining the Zope 3 core and came up with this footnote for myself:
Maybe this can be used as a spark to spur some discussion about the term
'Zope 3
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.01.2007, 00:44 + schrieb Martin Aspeli:
Code generation sucks. :)
But:
- ArchGenXML (hacky though it is) is great for business types because
it takes UML (which business analysts understand and customers can be
talked through) and produces content types
Hi,
that one fails for me as well.
I don't remember who checked this in, but I saw somebody talk about this
change lately.
Christian
Am Mittwoch, den 10.01.2007, 10:31 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
Baiju M wrote:
Hi, Can anyone verify that buildbot [1] send test failure error mails
to list?
Hi,
I'd like to propose a change to zc.selenium to increase test isolation
in the face of failing tests.
We use demostorage elegantly by keeping a stack of wrapped storages that
are pushed and popped automatically while the selenium tests run.
However, when a test fails, selenium might skip a
Hi,
after the initial Zope 3.3 release, we fixed quite a few bugs. I think
it's time for a 3.3.1 release now, which would also help the upcoming
Zope 2.10.2 release.
If anybody has time to do the 3.3.1 release, that would be very welcome!
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 -
Am Mittwoch, den 10.01.2007, 11:04 -0500 schrieb Benji York:
Christian Theune wrote:
I propose to add an ultimate pop at the beginning of each test, to
ensure consistency/isolation at those points.
Where ultimate pop means to remove all stacked demostorages added by
previous tests
Hi,
KLEIN Stéphane wrote:
I wonder whether we can add README file at subversion root directory
to explain how differentiate zope 2 from Zope 3 project ?
I suggest this content :
Frequently Asked Question :
Q : What directory are Zope 2 and Zope 3 projects ?
A : There aren't simple rules.
Hi,
Andreas Jung wrote:
I am actually looking at options for bringing SOAP support into Zope 2.
Is there some SOAP infrastructure available in Zope 3 (or some add-ons)
and might be re-used in a reasonable way?
I stumbled over a SOAP publisher yesterday, so I guess there is at least
something
Hi,
Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello,
In short: I would classify 699 and 700 as new features, 701 as bugfix.
For more details read on.
Issue 699
I hope if I change the event classes, by adding the interfaces existing
code won't break.
As stated by philikon this is not a
Hey,
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey Christian,
[using launchpad fo rmore than just bug tracking]
I'm assuming silence from everybody is permission. :)
Well, in that case I'll go ahead and clean up some of the
project/product structures that exist in launchpad already (hopefully
getting some
Hi,
I've updated the spring cleaning proposal with the suggestions (and
additional votes from people posting in this thread).
Please have a look at: http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/SpringCleaning07
There still is an open sub-task, to check for packages that are in src/
but not distributed with a
Hi,
Gary Poster wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 2:34 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi again,
Gary Poster wrote:
I don't have a very strong feeling about it, but lean towards bug
fix. It didn't break any of our code (or at least any of our
tests :-) ) so it seems safe from my perspective.
I
Hi,
Garanin Michael wrote:
Hello!
I not found raise zope.app.appsetup.IProcessStartingEvent. Is it
deprecated?
A quick check on the trunk tells me that it is triggered.
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Hi Jacob,
Jacob Holm wrote:
I don't have time to check it in now, but I will do it in a few days
unless i hear otherwise.
I didn't see any change on this, if there is anything I can do to help
or support your, I'd be happy to do so.
No worries if you're just short on time (we're all on
Hi,
Michael Kerrin wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 21:32, Christian Theune wrote:
Michael Kerrin wrote:
Suppose I could merge some of the changes that from that branch to get
rid of ssh_* and sftp code which should be independent of any twisted
upgrade. Then a SSL cleanup is also
Hi,
Jacob Holm wrote:
I have now checked it in on the trunk, and backported to the 3.3 and 3.2
branches.
Yay!
You can tell me if there is anything else I need to do.
From the perspective of the collector issue, this is all good. I'll
close the issue. (Looks like you even were lucky and the
Hi,
I was able to reproduce http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope3-dev/714 today.
We have a patch from the reporter without and I don't see why the
current tests fail to catch this behavior in the first place.
Did we ever drop support for ZServer? The changelog reads 'replaced
ZServer with
Neat!
I saw those possibilities in the last days already and think it's a nice
idea to manage them there.
How did you make the existing specs appear there so quickly?
Guess I'll play around a bit with the management of the series.
One thing that we should consider: Do we want to handle Zope
Hi,
Pjotr Prins wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:11:21PM -0800, Christian Theune wrote:
I don't think so. The Zope 3 wiki was built up as, and still is, a resource
for the development *of* Zope 3. We shouldn't
So according to you ZOPE3 is still an engineering project as the main
Wiki
Hi,
Roger Ineichen wrote:
What does removal mean?
We have two possible situations for a package that I'd like to consider
during spring cleaning:
1. packages that are in the src/ tree but are not distributed with Zope
releases
The question is whether those packages are maintained and
Me again,
I've been playing around with the launchpad sandboxes and am pretty
impressed by the features for managing specifications, doing release
planning and getting all those things integrated.
I'd like to propose that we think about using more of the launchpad
infrastructure than just the
Hi,
Christian Theune wrote:
Issue 735 (http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope3-dev/735) describes a
problem how IAnnotations are used within Zope.
I agree that this should be changed. I'd like to get some discussion on
the mailinglist on how to change this (I've added a short analysis
Christian Theune wrote:
I'd both apply r70331 and r71548 to 3.3 and 3.2 then.
JFTR: I've backported the small restructuring and the bugfix in r71612
(3.2) and r71611 (3.3)
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi again,
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I just stumbled over the package optionstorage. The checkin message
when this was added reads:
This is a generic solution for including editable and multi-lingual
vocbulary-like information in any annotatable object.
I'm not sure what that means
Hi,
Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello Stephan,
Tuesday, December 19, 2006, 2:53:33 PM, you wrote:
zope.wfmc
SR +1, but please make it very easily available. People do use this code in
SR production; Zope Corp. and Adam Groszer come to mind.
Yes, here :-)
If it would be moved out of the
Hi,
Chris Withers wrote:
I thought the idea of a seperate field was to make it a mandatory
dropdown so that at least we know what version of Zope the reporter is
using...
We can know it without the drop down. Using the drop down would allow us
to query for it or to restrict the entries to
Hey Michael,
Michael Kerrin wrote:
Suppose I could merge some of the changes that from that branch to get
rid of ssh_* and sftp code which should be independent of any twisted
upgrade. Then a SSL cleanup is also independent of an upgrade, come to
think about it.
Did you have any chance to
Hi again,
Gary Poster wrote:
I don't have a very strong feeling about it, but lean towards bug
fix. It didn't break any of our code (or at least any of our
tests :-) ) so it seems safe from my perspective.
I was trying to apply the patch to the 3.3 branch and noticed that the
patch isn't
Hi Steve,
Steve Alexander wrote:
I hereby offer the services of a member of the Launchpad team at
Canonical to write Collector code if necessary in order to get an export
of bugs from the Collector in a format that can be imported into
Launchpad, to import said bugs into a demonstration
Hi,
Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello Christian,
It seems that the activity has the attribute, but it's not declared
in the interface. z.wfmc interface was/is quite out of sync with the
implementation I think. I already fixed some, but looks like there are
still some lurking.
Any chance you want
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
The Zope3 collector isn't actually *that* bad in this respect. IMO,
it could do without the topic and version info fields.
Topic I'd agree with, but I would have thought version info would be
pretty useful?
That's what I thought too.
--
gocept
Jim Fulton wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
The Zope3 collector isn't actually *that* bad in this respect. IMO,
it could do without the topic and version info fields.
Topic I'd agree with, but I would have thought version info would be
pretty useful?
Sure, but it could go
Hi,
Jim Fulton wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
...
Is it what needs to be fixed before a release?
I think core is largely is a meaningless label in a system, the
collector where we collect too much information already.
Hmm. Would that mean we should provide better
Hi,
Jim Fulton wrote:
There are much more interesting things to ask them for, like
detailed instructions on how to reproduce a problem.
Fullack.
Right
now we do that with a separate field. (In other collectors this also
makes it easier to query/manage the bugs.)
Certainly the field we
Hi,
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'm sorry to bore you with that, but I didn't notice that we had a
definite outcome of the last discussion.
Of course not. That's what makes such discussions so tiresome.
People have lots of ideas and complaints about easy solutions,
like sticking with the current
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
That's definitely a good question. This might lead us to the
discussion
what Zope 3 is.
Yes, which I don't particularly want to do now. :)
Ack. I'm just interested in finding out priorities for bugs (for me
Hi,
Zagy and I stumbled over the widgets today, and I already had a
workaround sitting on a widget that we wrote and wanted to remove this
issue.
The issue is that the method _getCurrentValue sometimes returns an
'input value' and sometimes 'a form value' (specifically: it returns a
form value
Hi,
either XMLRPC or the functional testing ServerProxy seems to have a
slight regression. The zope.app.publisher.xmlrpc tests which use the
functional testing ServerProxy don't fail.
I've attached a doctest that demonstrates the failure on the trunk. (404
- Doesn't find the XMLRPC view.)
The
Yikes.
Forget the attached version. I forgot to fix some errors in the test and
didn't look deeply enough. *Sigh.*
Btw: I remembered that it worked before 2006-12-10, trying to find a
working revision now ...
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
Benji York wrote:
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Log message for revision 71542:
ignoring .svn in skeleton
Might I suggest that any file with a leading dot be ignored. That would
keep us from having to add exceptions for other revision control systems
(at least CVS, bzr, and Mercurial
Double yikes.
I fell for a trap where multiple tests where failing in the same way and
thought it was a core issue, but it were different issues each time,
nothing to worry about Zope 3.
I'm happy to see that Zope's test suites were correct. :)
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
what is our desire to keep WFMC workflow support in the core?
What does core mean?
That's definitely a good question. This might lead us to the discussion
what Zope 3 is. Do we have/want a (sharp/blurry) border
Moving discussion from collector to list as discussions fit over here.
We can link to the discussion and provide the result in the collector later.
(For people joining the discussion, have a look at the collector entry
to catch up if you like.)
Collector: Zope 3 ... wrote:
Issue #721 Update
Please ignore the last post, my mailer was too trigger happy.
The real post will be there in a few minutes.
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone
Hi,
Moving discussion from collector to list as discussions fit over here.
We can link to the discussion and provide the result in the collector
later, I'm not sure whether this needs so much more discussion though.
(For people joining the discussion, have a look at the collector entry
to catch
Hi,
Paul Carduner wrote:
h3Fractals/h3
applet code=/Programs/Fractals/Attractor.class height=100
width=600/applet
On the static site, this html loads the java applet perfectly. On the
zope3 site however the browser recognizes the java applet, but it
fails to load. Opening up the java
101 - 200 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
