tools-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• [tools-discuss] Suggested project endorsements for tools community Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Suggested project endorsements for tools community Valerie Bubb Fenwick
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Suggested project endorsements for tools community Mark Martin
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Suggested project endorsements for tools community Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Suggested project endorsements for tools community Stephen Hahn
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Suggested project endorsements for tools community Scott Rotondo
• [tools-discuss] Installing Open Solaris in a Mircosoft Virtual Machine. Comcast Email
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Installing Open Solaris in a Mircosoft Virtual Machine. Jürgen Keil
• [tools-discuss] cannot build 'ip' module Girish Moodalbail
• [tools-discuss] Is there any way to overload __TIME__ & __DATE__ on Studio compilers? Bart Smaalders
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Is there any way to overload __TIME__ & __DATE__ on Studio compilers? Mike Kupfer
• [tools-discuss] hg view menu font issue Will Fiveash
  • Re: [tools-discuss] hg view menu font issue Danek Duvall
  • Re: [tools-discuss] hg view menu font issue Jan Hnatek
  • Re: [tools-discuss] hg view menu font issue Danek Duvall
• [tools-discuss] code review request for shortened form of CDDL block Mark J. Nelson
  • [tools-discuss] Use this note: code review request for shortened form of CDDL block Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Use this note: code review request for shortened form of CDDL block James C. McPherson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Use this note: code review request for shortened form of CDDL block Mark J. Nelson
  • [tools-discuss] maintaining license URL (was code review request for shortened form of CDDL block) Mike Kupfer
  • Re: [tools-discuss] maintaining license URL (was code review request for shortened form of CDDL block) Alan Burlison
  • Re: [tools-discuss] maintaining license URL (was code review request for shortened form of CDDL block) Mike Kupfer
• Re: [tools-discuss] searching for bugs (was: [Bug 8808] SUNWimagick package IPS b111a for i386pc 32bits is 64bits) Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [tools-discuss] searching for bugs (was: [Bug 8808] SUNWimagick package IPS b111a for i386pc 32bits is 64bits) timeless
  • Re: [tools-discuss] searching for bugs gerard Henry
  • Re: [tools-discuss] searching for bugs timeless
  • Re: [tools-discuss] searching for bugs Bill Rushmore
  • Re: [tools-discuss] searching for bugs Alan Coopersmith
• [tools-discuss] illegal instructions in dbx vs mdb Mike Gerdts
  • Re: [tools-discuss] illegal instructions in dbx vs mdb David Powell
  • Re: [tools-discuss] illegal instructions in dbx vs mdb Mike Gerdts
  • Re: [tools-discuss] illegal instructions in dbx vs mdb Adam Leventhal
  • Re: [tools-discuss] illegal instructions in dbx vs mdb Jason King
  • Re: [tools-discuss] illegal instructions in dbx vs mdb Jason King
  • Re: [tools-discuss] illegal instructions in dbx vs mdb Mike Gerdts
  • Re: [tools-discuss] illegal instructions in dbx vs mdb Jason King
• [tools-discuss] DevRef : how does tools proto area work? (try 3) Chris Quenelle
  • Re: [tools-discuss] DevRef : how does tools proto area work? (try 3) Mike Kupfer
  • Re: [tools-discuss] DevRef : how does tools proto area work? (try 3) Chris Quenelle
• [tools-discuss] what plans do we have for tracking updated Mercurial versions? James C. McPherson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] what plans do we have for tracking updated Mercurial versions? Richard Lowe
• Re: [tools-discuss] [Fwd: [Bugzilla] Opensolaris potential ZFS bugs] Tim Haley
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [Fwd: [Bugzilla] Opensolaris potential ZFS bugs] Danek Duvall
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [Fwd: [Bugzilla] Opensolaris potential ZFS bugs] timeless
• [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary review for http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? Roland Mainz
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary review for http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? James C. McPherson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary review forhttp://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? Roland Mainz
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary review forhttp://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? James C. McPherson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary reviewforhttp://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? Roland Mainz
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary review for http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? Vladimir Kotal
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary review forhttp://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? Roland Mainz
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary reviewforhttp://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? Roland Mainz
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary reviewforhttp://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? Richard Lowe
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary reviewforhttp://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? Darren J Moffat
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Quick preliminary reviewforhttp://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr6842892_webrev_cleanup_002/ ? Vladimir Kotal
• [tools-discuss] can someone create a bugzilla group for me? Tim Haley
  • Re: [tools-discuss] can someone create a bugzilla group for me? Danek Duvall
• [tools-discuss] rejection/moderation policies on this list? Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] rejection/moderation policies on this list? Bonnie Corwin
  • Re: [tools-discuss] rejection/moderation policies on this list? Valerie Bubb Fenwick
  • Re: [tools-discuss] rejection/moderation policies on this list? Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] rejection/moderation policies on this list? Bonnie Corwin
  • Re: [tools-discuss] rejection/moderation policies on this list? Keith M Wesolowski
  • Re: [tools-discuss] rejection/moderation policies on this list? Keith M Wesolowski
  • Re: [tools-discuss] rejection/moderation policies on this list? Bonnie Corwin
• [tools-discuss] Question about "look_for_prog" usage in webrev.sh ? Roland Mainz
• [tools-discuss] code review request: 6680889 nightly(1) -s option Vita Batrla
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request: 6680889 nightly(1) -s option Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request: 6680889 nightly(1) -s option Danek Duvall
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request: 6680889 nightly(1) -s option Darren J Moffat
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request: 6680889 nightly(1) -s option Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request: 6680889 nightly(1) -s option Vita Batrla
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request: 6680889 nightly(1) -s option Vita Batrla
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request: 6680889 nightly(1) -s option Roland Mainz
• [tools-discuss] cadmium and branches? Shawn Walker
• [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Rainer Orth
  • [tools-discuss] CR #6414843 ("SUNWonbld shouldn't install sgml man pages") ... / was: Re: code review request for some onbld changes Roland Mainz
  • Re: [tools-discuss] CR #6414843 ("SUNWonbld shouldn't install sgml man pages") ... / was: Re: code review request for some onbld changes Rainer Orth
  • Re: [tools-discuss] CR #6414843 ("SUNWonbld shouldn't install sgml man pages") ... / was: Re: code review request for some onbld changes Darren J Moffat
  • Re: [tools-discuss] CR #6414843("SUNWonbld shouldn't install sgml man pages") ... / was: Re: code reviewrequest for some onbld changes Roland Mainz
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Darren J Moffat
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Rainer Orth
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Danek Duvall
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Rainer Orth
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Rainer Orth
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Shawn Walker
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Rainer Orth
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Shawn Walker
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Rainer Orth
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Shawn Walker
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Danek Duvall
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request for some onbld changes Rainer Orth
• [tools-discuss] code review: bunch of tiny fixes in webrev Vladimir Kotal
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review: bunch of tiny fixes in webrev Jan Friedel
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review: bunch of tiny fixes in webrev Vladimir Kotal
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review: bunch of tiny fixes in webrev Jan Friedel
• [tools-discuss] Should opensolaris-bugs forum/mailing list be removed? Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [website-discuss] Should opensolaris-bugs forum/mailing list be removed? Tim Foster
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [website-discuss] Should opensolaris-bugs forum/mailing list be removed? Clay Baenziger
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [website-discuss] Should opensolaris-bugs forum/mailing list be removed? Tim Foster
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [website-discuss] Should opensolaris-bugs forum/mailing list be removed? Clay Baenziger
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [website-discuss] Should opensolaris-bugs forum/mailing list be removed? Bonnie Corwin
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [website-discuss] Should opensolaris-bugs forum/mailing list be removed? Bonnie Corwin
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [website-discuss] Should opensolaris-bugs forum/mailing list be removed? Glynn Foster
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [website-discuss] Should opensolaris-bugs forum/mailing list be removed? Bonnie Corwin
• [tools-discuss] code review: wider mktemp template for webrev Vladimir Kotal
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review: wider mktemp template for webrev Dan Price
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review: wider mktemp template for webrev Jan Friedel
• [tools-discuss] ON nightly non-debug builds of closed sources? Ira Cooper
  • Re: [tools-discuss] ON nightly non-debug builds of closed sources? Bonnie Corwin
  • Re: [tools-discuss] ON nightly non-debug builds of closed sources? Ira Cooper
  • Re: [tools-discuss] ON nightly non-debug builds of closed sources? Ira Cooper
• [tools-discuss] What happened to the Solaris 10 package of Mercurial Ben Taylor
  • Re: [tools-discuss] What happened to the Solaris 10 package of Mercurial Bonnie Corwin
  • Re: [tools-discuss] What happened to the Solaris 10 package of Mercurial Shawn Walker
  • Re: [tools-discuss] What happened to the Solaris 10 package of Mercurial Shawn Walker
  • Re: [tools-discuss] What happened to the Solaris 10 package of Mercurial Ben Taylor
  • Re: [tools-discuss] What happened to the Solaris 10 package of Mercurial Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] What happened to the Solaris 10 package of Mercurial Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] What happened to the Solaris 10 package of Mercurial Lukas Oboril
• Re: [tools-discuss] Undefined SSL symbols when linking against libgnomevfs James Andrewartha
• [tools-discuss] shifting project focus/mailing list change: scm-migration in maintenance, opendev ongoing Mark J. Nelson
• [tools-discuss] code review request: webrev repository name logic for "webrev -n -U" Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request: webrev repository name logic for "webrev -n -U" Vladimir Kotal
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request: webrev repository name logic for "webrev -n -U" Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] code review request: webrev repository name logic for "webrev -n -U" Vladimir Kotal
• [tools-discuss] Stuck on-closed-bin nightly updates? Jürgen Keil
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Stuck on-closed-bin nightly updates? Peter Memishian
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Stuck on-closed-bin nightly updates? Mike Kupfer
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Stuck on-closed-bin nightly updates? Jürgen Keil
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Stuck on-closed-bin nightly updates? Mike Kupfer
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Stuck on-closed-bin nightly updates? Robert Stonehouse
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Stuck on-closed-bin nightly updates? Mike Kupfer
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Stuck on-closed-bin nightly updates? Richard Lowe
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Stuck on-closed-bin nightly updates? Mike Kupfer
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Stuck on-closed-bin nightly updates? Jürgen Keil
• [tools-discuss] sed output to a file Aubrey Li
  • Re: [tools-discuss] sed output to a file Doug Leavitt
  • Re: [tools-discuss] sed output to a file Aubrey Li
  • Re: [tools-discuss] sed output to a file Hugh McIntyre
  • Re: [tools-discuss] sed output to a file Aubrey Li
• [tools-discuss] Viewing the diffs for a changeset using the web interface for Mercurial Arvind Srinivasan
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Viewing the diffs for a changeset using the web interface for Mercurial timeless
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Viewing the diffs for a changeset using the web interface for Mercurial Cyril Plisko
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Viewing the diffs for a changeset using the web interface for Mercurial Cyril Plisko
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Viewing the diffs for a changeset using the web interface for Mercurial Cyril Plisko
  • Re: [tools-discuss] Viewing the diffs for a changeset using the web interface for Mercurial Cyril Plisko
• [tools-discuss] HEADS UP: EOL warning for http://opensolaris.org/cgi/arc.py Alan Burlison
  • Re: [tools-discuss] HEADS UP: EOL warning for http://opensolaris.org/cgi/arc.py Peter Memishian
  • Re: [tools-discuss] HEADS UP: EOL warning for http://opensolaris.org/cgi/arc.py Alan Burlison
• [tools-discuss] webrev, bldenv and nested repos Vladimir Kotal
  • Re: [tools-discuss] webrev, bldenv and nested repos James C. McPherson
• [tools-discuss] git support at opensolaris.org Cyril Plisko
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [website-discuss] git support at opensolaris.org Alan Burlison
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [website-discuss] git support at opensolaris.org Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [tools-discuss] mercurial rebase (was: git support at opensolaris.org) Danek Duvall
  • Re: [tools-discuss] git support at opensolaris.org Cyril Plisko
• [tools-discuss] cr.opensolaris.org appears to be sick James Carlson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] cr.opensolaris.org appears to be sick James Carlson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] cr.opensolaris.org appears to be sick Danek Duvall
  • Re: [tools-discuss] cr.opensolaris.org appears to be sick James Carlson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] cr.opensolaris.org appears to be sick Danek Duvall
  • Re: [tools-discuss] cr.opensolaris.org appears to be sick James Carlson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] cr.opensolaris.org appears to be sick Dan Price
• [tools-discuss] request for new Product/Component on defect.opensolaris.org Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for new Product/Component on defect.opensolaris.org Danek Duvall
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for new Product/Component on defect.opensolaris.org Danek Duvall
• [tools-discuss] Flag day: onnv-tools webrev now requires ksh93 Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [on-discuss] Flag day: onnv-tools webrev now requires ksh93 Roland Mainz
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [on-discuss] onnv-tools webrev now requires ksh93 Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [on-discuss] Flag day: onnv-tools webrev now requires ksh93 James C. McPherson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [on-discuss] Flag day: onnv-tools webrev now requires ksh93 Holger Berger
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [on-discuss] Flag day: onnv-tools webrev now requires ksh93 Milan Jurik
  • Re: [tools-discuss] [on-discuss] Flag day: onnv-tools webrev now requires ksh93 James C. McPherson
• [tools-discuss] Heads-up for webrev users tracking bugs outside of Bugster Mark J. Nelson
• [tools-discuss] Helpful bugzilla tool for finding frequent duplicates Shawn Walker
• [tools-discuss] a note on how to reference comments in bugzilla timeless
  • Re: [tools-discuss] a note on how to reference comments in bugzilla David Powell
  • Re: [tools-discuss] a note on how to reference comments in bugzilla timeless
  • Re: [tools-discuss] a note on how to reference comments in bugzilla Peter Memishian
  • Re: [tools-discuss] a note on how to reference comments in bugzilla Shawn Walker
  • Re: [tools-discuss] a note on how to reference comments in bugzilla Darren J Moffat
  • Re: [tools-discuss] a note on how to reference comments in bugzilla Valerie Bubb Fenwick
  • Re: [tools-discuss] editing comments in bugzilla Scott Rotondo
  • Re: [tools-discuss] a note on how to reference comments in bugzilla David Bustos
  • Re: [tools-discuss] a note on how to reference comments in bugzilla timeless
• [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Darren J Moffat
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Darren J Moffat
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Darren J Moffat
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Danek Duvall
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Mark J. Nelson
  • Re: [tools-discuss] request for review: webrev.sh updates to generalize cross referencing Danek Duvall

• Earlier messages
• Later messages