[gentoo-user] How to update (only) all installed KDE packages

2010-03-03 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi,

I'd like to upgrade all my installed package from, say, kde-base/* .
emerge -u kde-base/kde-meta doesn't work unfortunately.

Is there something easier than 
eix --only-names -I 'kde-base/*' | xargs emerge -uv1 -j4 --keep-going

Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.

-- 
Helmut Jarausch

Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH - Aachen University
D 52056 Aachen, Germany




Re: [gentoo-user] How to update (only) all installed KDE packages

2010-03-03 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch 03 März 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'd like to upgrade all my installed package from, say, kde-base/* .
 emerge -u kde-base/kde-meta doesn't work unfortunately.
 
 Is there something easier than
 eix --only-names -I 'kde-base/*' | xargs emerge -uv1 -j4 --keep-going
 
 Many thanks for a hint,
 Helmut.

emerge -u @kde

if you have used sets and a recent portage version this should work nicely.



Re: [gentoo-user] How to update (only) all installed KDE packages

2010-03-03 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On  3 Mar, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
 On Mittwoch 03 März 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'd like to upgrade all my installed package from, say, kde-base/* .
 emerge -u kde-base/kde-meta doesn't work unfortunately.
 
 Is there something easier than
 eix --only-names -I 'kde-base/*' | xargs emerge -uv1 -j4 --keep-going
 
 Many thanks for a hint,
 Helmut.
 
 emerge -u @kde
 
 if you have used sets and a recent portage version this should work nicely.

Thanks, I had hoped that, but where is the set '@kde'

I have portage-2.2_63 but
emerge --list-sets
only reports

downgrade
installed
live-rebuild
module-rebuild
preserved-rebuild
rebuilt-binaries
security
selected
system
unavailable
world


Helmut.
-- 
Helmut Jarausch

Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH - Aachen University
D 52056 Aachen, Germany



Re: [gentoo-user] do we have a write-redirect snapshot system on linux?

2010-03-03 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On  3 Mar, Xi Shen wrote:
 hi,
 
 both lvm2 and zfs are copy-on-write snapshot system. do we have a
 write-redirect snapshot system on linux?
 
If I remember right, this can be achieved with aufs2 .

Helmut.

-- 
Helmut Jarausch

Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH - Aachen University
D 52056 Aachen, Germany



Re: [gentoo-user] How to update (only) all installed KDE packages

2010-03-03 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch 03 März 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
 On  3 Mar, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
  On Mittwoch 03 März 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
  Hi,
  
  I'd like to upgrade all my installed package from, say, kde-base/* .
  emerge -u kde-base/kde-meta doesn't work unfortunately.
  
  Is there something easier than
  eix --only-names -I 'kde-base/*' | xargs emerge -uv1 -j4 --keep-going
  
  Many thanks for a hint,
  Helmut.
  
  emerge -u @kde
  
  if you have used sets and a recent portage version this should work
  nicely.
 
 Thanks, I had hoped that, but where is the set '@kde'
 
 I have portage-2.2_63 but
 emerge --list-sets
 only reports
 
 downgrade
 installed
 live-rebuild
 module-rebuild
 preserved-rebuild
 rebuilt-binaries
 security
 selected
 system
 unavailable
 world
 
 
 Helmut.

hm, mine is a bit bigger...

kde
kde-4.3
kde-4.4
kde-4.5
kde-extras-live
kde-live
kdeaccessibility
kdeaccessibility-4.3
kdeaccessibility-4.4
kdeaccessibility-4.5
kdeaccessibility-live
kdeadmin
kdeadmin-4.3
kdeadmin-4.4
kdeadmin-4.5
kdeadmin-live
kdeartwork
kdeartwork-4.3
kdeartwork-4.4
kdeartwork-4.5
kdeartwork-live
kdebase
kdebase-4.3
kdebase-4.4
kdebase-4.5
kdebase-live
kdebindings
kdebindings-4.3
kdebindings-4.4
kdebindings-4.5
kdebindings-live
kdedeps-4.4
kdedeps-4.5
kdedeps-live
kdeedu
kdeedu-4.3
kdeedu-4.4
kdeedu-4.5
kdeedu-live
kdegames
kdegames-4.3
kdegames-4.4
kdegames-4.5
kdegames-live
kdegraphics
kdegraphics-4.3
kdegraphics-4.4
kdegraphics-4.5
kdegraphics-live
kdelibs
kdelibs-4.3
kdelibs-4.4
kdelibs-4.5
kdelibs-live
kdemultimedia
kdemultimedia-4.3
kdemultimedia-4.4
kdemultimedia-4.5
kdemultimedia-live
kdenetwork
kdenetwork-4.3
kdenetwork-4.4
kdenetwork-4.5
kdenetwork-live
kdeoptional
kdeoptional-4.3
kdeoptional-4.4
kdeoptional-4.5
kdeoptional-live
kdepim
kdepim-4.3
kdepim-4.4
kdepim-4.5
kdepim-live
kdesdk
kdesdk-4.3
kdesdk-4.4
kdesdk-4.5
kdesdk-live
kdetoys
kdetoys-4.3
kdetoys-4.4
kdetoys-4.5
kdetoys-live
kdeutils
kdeutils-4.3
kdeutils-4.4
kdeutils-4.5
kdeutils-live
kdewebdev
kdewebdev-4.3
kdewebdev-4.4
kdewebdev-4.5
kdewebdev-live
koffice
koffice-2
koffice-live
live-rebuild
maemo6
module-rebuild
plasmoids
plasmoids-live
preserved-rebuild
qt
qt-all-4.5
qt-all-4.5-live-kde
qt-all-4.5-live-nokia
qt-all-4.6
qt-all-4.6-live-kde
qt-all-4.6-live-nokia
qt-all-live-kde
qt-all-live-nokia
qt-extras-live
rebuilt-binaries
security
selected
system
unavailable
world


because of the KDE overlay (and qt and X) 
but you could create your own set in /etc/portage/sets

or you could unpack that tarball I send you off list in /etc/portage/sets



Re: [gentoo-user] Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-03 Thread Stroller


On 2 Mar 2010, at 15:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:

... I'm happy with the new default arrangement: mainstream
packages under /usr/portage; layman overlays under /var/lib/layman;  
and

my own variations under /usr/local/portage. Nice clean boundaries.


Not that I really care, but I find this layout somewhat illogical.

It makes perfect sense to me that /usr/local/portage should be the  
local version of /usr/portage


But the different Unix directories are supposed to have different  
general purposes. I don't remember the details of that off the top of  
my head, but putting something in /var ought to indicate that it is  
somewhat different in nature /or purpose to something in /usr. The  
main Portage tree  a layman overlay are not so fundamentally  
different, IMO.


Stroller.




Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!

2010-03-03 Thread Alex Schuster
Alan McKinnon writes:

 On Monday 01 March 2010 18:08:05 Alex Schuster wrote:
  On the other hand, from time to time I have show-stoppers, and then I
  cannot use kmail, or no KDE4 at all. And have to invest time to solve
  this. And there are these annoying things. Like Amarok being very
  unstable, and taking 5 minutes to start. What the heck is it doing in
  this time?
 
 Fuck knows what amarok-2x does for the first 5 minutes. I *think* On my
 system it scans the music directory, presumably to find updates that
 happened when amarok was not running. Fair enough, can't argue that,
 but why is it so *slow*???

Yes, it scans the collection, I just verified that by removing a folder 
from my collection. Start-up takes 7 minutes, I guess this also slows down 
my KDE4 start-up even further (strigi also scans some stuff for about a 
minute, along this music files I did not touch in any way). So when I save 
my KDE session I have to remember to quit amarok before that. Of course, I 
also have to remember to start amarok some time after I logged in, so I 
can play music when I want without having to wait 7 minutes first.

This does not feel right...

BTW, a find /data/mp3 -type d takes about a minute. Checking the date of 
the directories to verify they did not alter since the last scan should 
not take that much longer.

Ah, I see the problem. It mainly scans /data/mp3/incoming, a directory I 
have NOT selected as collection folder (but most other directories in 
/data/mp3 are selected). Still, those files do not show up in my 
collection, which is fine - some time ago amarok did index all in 
/data/mp3, even if a directory was not selected.


 Fuck also knows what the amarok devs are doing in general. I still
 can't find a way to move stuff to an mp3 player like the old 1.4
 version did. And the library thingamagij still doesn't always update
 tags, or put tag changes that it itself did into it's own database. It
 gladly accepts any changes you make in the Edit Tags dialog, and tries
 to write them, even if it knows it cannot do it (no support for that
 format, permissions, etc). Then, no warning or message about this.

Ah, this looks familiar, I ran into this, too.

 Depending on which bleeding edge latest-svn commit build you happen to
 get on any given day, this last might or might not tell you something
 in the status bar.

I'm always using the newest version that is not hard-masked. with every 
new version, some things get better, but others get worse. This delays and 
startup times are new to me, but on the other hand I did not get any file 
corruption for a long time.
I do not like the new toolbar though. Where are the stop, forward and back 
buttons? And for the volume control I have to move the mouse in a circle 
around it... or use the scroll wheel, okay. Nah, I liked it better the way 
it was before.


 For all the above reasons, and more, I have switched to clementine
 (it's in portage). It's a Qt port of amarok-1.4 and has equivalents of
 all the music- playing goodness that amarok used to have. It doesn't
 do tags, external players, wikipedia etc etc, it just plays music. And
 you have to tag your music by other means with eg kid3. I can live
 with that. At least it starts and stays up.

Nice! But not for me. I like the wikipedia stuff. And tagging, now that it 
seems to work. And what amarok is supposed to become. Yes, I like it much 
better than the old amarok, it's just that things do not already work 
fine. So I will keep suffering, until some day amarok will not do all the 
annoying stuff it currently does. The day will come! Hopefully long before 
they start coding amarok-3 and all gets worse again. I'll just have to 
wait. And wait.

Thanks anyway for the tip, at least I can use clementine when I see that 
amarok is not running yet and did not do its 7 minutes of scanning 
already.

Wonko



Re: [gentoo-user] Advice/best practices for a new Gentoo installation

2010-03-03 Thread Alex Schuster
Neil Bothwick writes:

 On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:35:42 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
   - best filesystem for portage? something compressed or with small
   cluster size maybe.
  
  I think reiserfs with the notail option is recommended.
 
 The data I've seen indicates that ext2 is fastest, that's what I use.

I thought the small files of the portage tree especially profit from the 
notail option in reiserfs? Did you change the block size?

 There's no need for journalling on the portage tree, it's small enough
 to fsck quickly and if it does get broken, reformat and resync.

Would the journaling overhead be noticeable? 
I also had used ext2 for my portage tree first, then I read somewhere that 
reiserfs would be the best. BTW, I have distfiles and pkgdir somewhere 
else, if not the fsck would not be so fast.

Just for fun, I just copied my $PORTDIR into my tmpfs, emerge -DpN @system 
@world takes between 81 and 53 seconds. With reiserfs, I get 130 seconds 
first ($PORTDIR was unmounted first and mounted again to clear the 
caches), and 57 seconds in the second attempt.

I had expected that tmpfs would be even faster. I think I just keep it the 
way it is now.

Wonko



Re: [gentoo-user] Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:10:21 +, Stroller wrote:

 But the different Unix directories are supposed to have different  
 general purposes. I don't remember the details of that off the top of  
 my head, but putting something in /var ought to indicate that it is  
 somewhat different in nature /or purpose to something in /usr. The  
 main Portage tree  a layman overlay are not so fundamentally  
 different, IMO.

That's right, they should both be in /var.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

There's too much blood in my caffeine system.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Stroller
There seem to have been a few people posting with filesystem  
corruption in the last week or two. It seems to be my turn, so I hope  
it isn't contagious. The cause here is quite clear - whilst rummaging  
in the server cupboard yesterday, power to the machine was  
accidentally disconnected.


I have booted with a live CD  run `reiserfsck --fix-fixable` on the  
filesystem, but nevertheless when I attempt to boot the system I get a  
failed to open the device... no such file or directory message,  
followed by another error as per subject line.


However, you will see from this screenshot (taken with an IP KVM) that  
the filesystem does indeed seem to have been mounted successfully, if  
read-only:


http://linux.stroller.uk.eu.org/fs-corruption.png

All I did here was log in with the root password.


When I boot with a live CD I can mount, read  write the filesystem:

r...@sysresccd /root % mount -v -L root /mnt/gentoo
mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/sda3
   I will try type reiserfs
/dev/sda3 on /mnt/gentoo type reiserfs (rw)
r...@sysresccd /root % ls /mnt/gentoo
bin  boot  dev  etc  home  lib  mnt  opt  proc  root  sbin  sys  tmp   
usr  var

r...@sysresccd /root % touch /mnt/gentoo/foo
r...@sysresccd /root % echo foobar  /mnt/gentoo/foo
r...@sysresccd /root % ls -lh !!:$
ls -lh /mnt/gentoo/foo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7 2010-03-03 11:18 /mnt/gentoo/foo
r...@sysresccd /root % cat !!:$
cat /mnt/gentoo/foo
foobar
r...@sysresccd /root % rm !!:$
rm /mnt/gentoo/foo
rm: remove regular file `/mnt/gentoo/foo'? y
r...@sysresccd /root %

All the important system stuff on this PC is on a single partition. I  
have two other drives attached at /mnt/space  /mnt/morespace - they  
are XFS and I have run xfs_repair on both of them, which completes  
quickly indicating no problems.


I'm not really sure how to proceed next. I feel the problem is indeed  
on this reiserfs filesystem, the root filesystem with the label  
root. I can't help thinking that the problem is not that the system  
failed to open the device, but instead maybe that there's an  
important system file missing that means the init script (or whatever  
responsible for mounting the fiesystem) is not properly returning 0.  
Does this seem possible? Maybe the reiserfs handler for mount is  
somehow broken (performing the mount, but not returning 0, or perhaps  
broken in such as was it is able to mount read-only but not read-write).


I am tempted to chroot into the system and re-emerge system   
baselayout. If I'm correct in this above guess then re-emerging the  
correct file   will fix the problem. Right?


`reiserfsck --help` shows some other options besides the simple --fix- 
fixable - I assume the expert option of --scan-whole-partition is  
unsafe, but what about the --rebuild-sb or --rebuild-tree? Can I  
safely run these? Am I advised to run these?


Stroller.




Re: [gentoo-user] Advice/best practices for a new Gentoo installation

2010-03-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:52:55PM +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
 Neil Bothwick writes:
 
  On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:35:42 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
- best filesystem for portage? something compressed or with small
cluster size maybe.
   
   I think reiserfs with the notail option is recommended.
  
  The data I've seen indicates that ext2 is fastest, that's what I use.
 
 I thought the small files of the portage tree especially profit from the 
 notail option in reiserfs? Did you change the block size?

You mean the other way around, right? reiser defaults to tail-packing,
which can cause problems with GRUB and LILO, which is why notail is an
option which turns off tail-packing for those crazy enough to use
reiser on /boot. 

If you use notail on the portage tree, you get rid of that advantage,
then Neil is absolutely correct: there's not too much point in
journaling the portage tree, and if you actively make reiser
not-competitive on the storage-space direction, the only metric left
to compare is speed, and ext2 is faster. 

Incidentally, if you are willing to sacrifice speed for space, then a
sparsefile for /usr/portage may also be an option. 

W
-- 
Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
 et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton



Re: [gentoo-user] Advice/best practices for a new Gentoo installation

2010-03-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:52:55 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:

  The data I've seen indicates that ext2 is fastest, that's what I
  use.  
 
 I thought the small files of the portage tree especially profit from
 the notail option in reiserfs?

They benefit compared with using reiser with tail-packing.

 Did you change the block size?

I had to change both the block size and blocks per inode, otherwise I
would run out of inodes on a 1GB filesystem. You have to admire the
user-friendliness of ext!

  There's no need for journalling on the portage tree, it's small enough
  to fsck quickly and if it does get broken, reformat and resync.  
 
 Would the journaling overhead be noticeable? 
 I also had used ext2 for my portage tree first, then I read somewhere
 that reiserfs would be the best. BTW, I have distfiles and pkgdir
 somewhere else, if not the fsck would not be so fast.

It's certainly noticeable compared with ext3. Many benchmarks do show
ext2 to be the fastest filesystem, probably because of the lack of
journalling overhead.

Like you, I have $DISTDIR and $PKGDIR elsewhere, those files really
should not be mixed in with the portage tree.

 Just for fun, I just copied my $PORTDIR into my tmpfs, emerge -DpN
 @system @world takes between 81 and 53 seconds. With reiserfs, I get
 130 seconds first ($PORTDIR was unmounted first and mounted again to
 clear the caches), and 57 seconds in the second attempt.
 
 I had expected that tmpfs would be even faster. I think I just keep it
 the way it is now.

The exact same thought occurred to me. With a local tree to sync from,
tmpfs seemed a good choice (you could sync it from /etc/conf.d/local) but
it seems like it is not worth bothering with. I'll try a reiser3
filesystem without tail packing to see if it beats ext2.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] NoSQL?

2010-03-03 Thread Stroller


On 2 Mar 2010, at 17:07, walt wrote:


On 03/02/2010 04:23 AM, Arttu V. wrote:

On 3/2/10, waltw41...@gmail.com  wrote:
This article was a big surprise to me.  Am I the last one to hear  
about this

stuff?

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10461670-16.html?part=rssamp;subj=newsamp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20


If you're expecting a discussion then perhaps you'd care to narrow it
down a bit: which part of the article are we expected to feel
surprised about?


I was surprised that three major social networking sites have dumped
MySQL (but now the article says only two sites).  I've also not heard
of the NoSQL movement before, and I'm curious to know what's  
motivating

it.  Maybe nobody trusts Oracle?


I read the other day that Facebook have NOT dropped MySQL - they  
remain committed to it - but that they use NoSQL technologies for some  
of their queries as it is more scalable. This seems to concur with an  
update to the article, which not everyone may have seen.


Unless they are using closed-source modules to MySQL (do these exist?)  
the Oracle situation probably would not worry such large companies are  
Facebook  Twatter. They are big enough to support OSS MySQL on their  
own.


Stroller.




Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:24:42PM +, Stroller wrote:
 There seem to have been a few people posting with filesystem  
 corruption in the last week or two. It seems to be my turn, so I hope  
 it isn't contagious. The cause here is quite clear - whilst rummaging  
 in the server cupboard yesterday, power to the machine was  
 accidentally disconnected.
 
 I have booted with a live CD  run `reiserfsck --fix-fixable` on the  
 filesystem, but nevertheless when I attempt to boot the system I get a  
 failed to open the device... no such file or directory message,  
 followed by another error as per subject line.

from the output it looks like you are mounting by label? What if you
edit fstab to point to the device name /dev/hd?? instead of
LABEL=root? Check the filesystem label to make sure it is ok? 

Cheers, 

W
-- 
Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
 et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton



Re: [gentoo-user] Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 14:21:23 Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:10:21 +, Stroller wrote:
  But the different Unix directories are supposed to have different
  general purposes. I don't remember the details of that off the top of
  my head, but putting something in /var ought to indicate that it is
  somewhat different in nature /or purpose to something in /usr. The
  main Portage tree  a layman overlay are not so fundamentally
  different, IMO.
 
 That's right, they should both be in /var.

I concur. /usr has a long tradition is Unix of often being mounted read-only 
(think thin clients that mount it over NFS).

My set up is:

portage:/var/portage/
my overlay: /var/portage/local/alan/
layman: /var/portage/local/layman/*

As portage is hard-coded to not fiddle with $PORTDIR/local/, this works well 
for me and every ebuild on the system is under one mount point.

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] How to update (only) all installed KDE packages

2010-03-03 Thread Graham Murray
Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de writes:

 Hi,

 I'd like to upgrade all my installed package from, say, kde-base/* .
 emerge -u kde-base/kde-meta doesn't work unfortunately.

 Is there something easier than 

Try emerge -u $(qlist -IC kde-base/)



[gentoo-user] Internal DAT72 : HP C7438A

2010-03-03 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger

Does anyone know what I need to do to correctly adress such a drive?

I have the modules usb_storage and st loaded but I don't get any
/dev/(n)stX ...

Kernel 2.6.31-gentoo-r10 ... hmm

Do I have to add my own udev-rules ??

Thanks for any pointers, Stefan



Re: [gentoo-user] Internal DAT72 : HP C7438A

2010-03-03 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 03.03.2010 14:07, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
 
 Does anyone know what I need to do to correctly adress such a drive?
 
 I have the modules usb_storage and st loaded but I don't get any
 /dev/(n)stX ...

Forgot to mention: it is connected via USB ... internally ...

I see it via


# lsusb -v -d 03f0:0125

Bus 008 Device 003: ID 03f0:0125 Hewlett-Packard
Device Descriptor:
  bLength18
  bDescriptorType 1
  bcdUSB   2.00
  bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level)
  bDeviceSubClass 0
  bDeviceProtocol 0
  bMaxPacketSize064
  idVendor   0x03f0 Hewlett-Packard
  idProduct  0x0125
  bcdDevice   30.30
  iManufacturer   1 Hewlett Packard
  iProduct2 DAT72 USB Tape
  iSerial 3 485531095336544D
  bNumConfigurations  1
  Configuration Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 2
wTotalLength   32
bNumInterfaces  1
bConfigurationValue 1
iConfiguration  5 High Speed
bmAttributes 0x80
  (Bus Powered)
MaxPower2mA
Interface Descriptor:
  bLength 9
  bDescriptorType 4
  bInterfaceNumber0
  bAlternateSetting   0
  bNumEndpoints   2
  bInterfaceClass 8 Mass Storage
  bInterfaceSubClass  6 SCSI
  bInterfaceProtocol 80 Bulk (Zip)
  iInterface  6 SCSI Over USB
  Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x02  EP 2 OUT
bmAttributes2
  Transfer TypeBulk
  Synch Type   None
  Usage Type   Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0200  1x 512 bytes
bInterval   0
  Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x86  EP 6 IN
bmAttributes2
  Transfer TypeBulk
  Synch Type   None
  Usage Type   Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0200  1x 512 bytes
bInterval   0
Device Qualifier (for other device speed):
  bLength10
  bDescriptorType 6
  bcdUSB   2.00
  bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level)
  bDeviceSubClass 0
  bDeviceProtocol 0
  bMaxPacketSize064
  bNumConfigurations  1
Device Status: 0x
  (Bus Powered)



Re: [gentoo-user] do we have a write-redirect snapshot system on linux?

2010-03-03 Thread Xi Shen
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
 If I remember right, this can be achieved with aufs2 .

 Helmut.


it is a file system with branching feature. the behavior should looks
like snapshot, but it is on file system level. i am trying to look up
on on the block device level, like the lvm2. anyway, i will give a
try.

thanks


-- 
Best Regards,
David Shen

http://twitter.com/davidshen84/



Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Stroller


On 3 Mar 2010, at 12:42, Willie Wong wrote:


On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:24:42PM +, Stroller wrote:

There seem to have been a few people posting with filesystem
corruption in the last week or two. It seems to be my turn, so I hope
it isn't contagious. The cause here is quite clear - whilst rummaging
in the server cupboard yesterday, power to the machine was
accidentally disconnected.

I have booted with a live CD  run `reiserfsck --fix-fixable` on the
filesystem, but nevertheless when I attempt to boot the system I  
get a

failed to open the device... no such file or directory message,
followed by another error as per subject line.


from the output it looks like you are mounting by label? What if you
edit fstab to point to the device name /dev/hd?? instead of
LABEL=root? Check the filesystem label to make sure it is ok?


Many thanks for this suggestion, however following it makes no  
difference, except in the trivia that it says failed to open the  
device '/dev/hda3': No such file or directory (instead of LABEL=...).


I also tried editing grub to point to /dev/sda3 (although admittedly  
with the LABEL= entry in /etc/fstab) but that makes no difference. I  
have never tried (intentionally) reconfiguring this kernel to use /dev/ 
sdX instead of /dev/hdX and I'm pretty sure it's booted using the  
current kernel  configuration in the past.


Stroller.




Re: [gentoo-user] Internal DAT72 : HP C7438A

2010-03-03 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch 03 März 2010, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
 Am 03.03.2010 14:07, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
  Does anyone know what I need to do to correctly adress such a drive?
  
  I have the modules usb_storage and st loaded but I don't get any
  /dev/(n)stX ...
 

but you do get /dev/sgX devices?
You have multiple lun support compiled in?



Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
 There seem to have been a few people posting with filesystem corruption in
 the last week or two. It seems to be my turn, so I hope it isn't contagious.
 The cause here is quite clear - whilst rummaging in the server cupboard
 yesterday, power to the machine was accidentally disconnected.

 I have booted with a live CD  run `reiserfsck --fix-fixable` on the
 filesystem, but nevertheless when I attempt to boot the system I get a
 failed to open the device... no such file or directory message, followed
 by another error as per subject line.

 However, you will see from this screenshot (taken with an IP KVM) that the
 filesystem does indeed seem to have been mounted successfully, if read-only:

 http://linux.stroller.uk.eu.org/fs-corruption.png

 All I did here was log in with the root password.


 When I boot with a live CD I can mount, read  write the filesystem:

 r...@sysresccd /root % mount -v -L root /mnt/gentoo
 mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/sda3
       I will try type reiserfs
 /dev/sda3 on /mnt/gentoo type reiserfs (rw)
 r...@sysresccd /root % ls /mnt/gentoo
 bin  boot  dev  etc  home  lib  mnt  opt  proc  root  sbin  sys  tmp  usr
  var
 r...@sysresccd /root % touch /mnt/gentoo/foo
 r...@sysresccd /root % echo foobar  /mnt/gentoo/foo
 r...@sysresccd /root % ls -lh !!:$
 ls -lh /mnt/gentoo/foo
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7 2010-03-03 11:18 /mnt/gentoo/foo
 r...@sysresccd /root % cat !!:$
 cat /mnt/gentoo/foo
 foobar
 r...@sysresccd /root % rm !!:$
 rm /mnt/gentoo/foo
 rm: remove regular file `/mnt/gentoo/foo'? y
 r...@sysresccd /root %

 All the important system stuff on this PC is on a single partition. I have
 two other drives attached at /mnt/space  /mnt/morespace - they are XFS and
 I have run xfs_repair on both of them, which completes quickly indicating no
 problems.

 I'm not really sure how to proceed next. I feel the problem is indeed on
 this reiserfs filesystem, the root filesystem with the label root. I can't
 help thinking that the problem is not that the system failed to open the
 device, but instead maybe that there's an important system file missing
 that means the init script (or whatever responsible for mounting the
 fiesystem) is not properly returning 0. Does this seem possible? Maybe the
 reiserfs handler for mount is somehow broken (performing the mount, but not
 returning 0, or perhaps broken in such as was it is able to mount read-only
 but not read-write).

 I am tempted to chroot into the system and re-emerge system  baselayout. If
 I'm correct in this above guess then re-emerging the correct file   will fix
 the problem. Right?

 `reiserfsck --help` shows some other options besides the simple
 --fix-fixable - I assume the expert option of --scan-whole-partition is
 unsafe, but what about the --rebuild-sb or --rebuild-tree? Can I safely run
 these? Am I advised to run these?

 Stroller.

Hi Stroller,
   Sorry for your problems. I've had a rash of machine problems over
the last 6 weeks. No fun. I feel for you.

   In my most recent case what looked like a simple disk corruption
problem was really a prelude to the drive just plain going bad. Have
you tried smartctl to see what it says about the drive at this point?

   It would be even more frustrating to chroot in, do all the work,
think you had it fixed and then the underlying foundation of your
house crumbles beneath you 3 weeks from now.

Good luck,
Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Mick
On 3 March 2010 13:28, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:

 On 3 Mar 2010, at 12:42, Willie Wong wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:24:42PM +, Stroller wrote:

 There seem to have been a few people posting with filesystem
 corruption in the last week or two. It seems to be my turn, so I hope
 it isn't contagious. The cause here is quite clear - whilst rummaging
 in the server cupboard yesterday, power to the machine was
 accidentally disconnected.

 I have booted with a live CD  run `reiserfsck --fix-fixable` on the
 filesystem, but nevertheless when I attempt to boot the system I get a
 failed to open the device... no such file or directory message,
 followed by another error as per subject line.

 from the output it looks like you are mounting by label? What if you
 edit fstab to point to the device name /dev/hd?? instead of
 LABEL=root? Check the filesystem label to make sure it is ok?

 Many thanks for this suggestion, however following it makes no difference,
 except in the trivia that it says failed to open the device '/dev/hda3': No
 such file or directory (instead of LABEL=...).

 I also tried editing grub to point to /dev/sda3 (although admittedly with
 the LABEL= entry in /etc/fstab) but that makes no difference. I have never
 tried (intentionally) reconfiguring this kernel to use /dev/sdX instead of
 /dev/hdX and I'm pretty sure it's booted using the current kernel 
 configuration in the past.

In my experience reiserfs is a very stable fs.  I had a dodgy memory
module once which I put up with for more than 9 months.  The machine
would lock up hard on a daily basis and the only way to get it going
again would be to pull the plug.  That would happen at random,
midstream emerge --sync, package updates, updatedb, etc.  It survived
through hundreds of crashes by fsck at the next boot.  Once or twice
things went hairy and I would get a message similar to yours.  On
these rare occasions I booted with a LiveCD and with the partitions
unmounted I ran --check, then --fix-fixable and finally
--rebuild-tree.  You may want to use an external drive with dd to
image the current / partition and do all your recovery work on that.
If you don't care too much about the risk of catastrophic failure then
just run --rebuild-tree with a LiveCD and see what you get.

Good luck.
-- 
Regards,
Mick



Re: [gentoo-user] Internal DAT72 : HP C7438A

2010-03-03 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 03.03.2010 14:47, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:

 but you do get /dev/sgX devices?

Yes.

Looks like the four SATA-disks, one cdrom and the tapedrive (recognized
as CDROM?):

# ls -l /dev/sg?
crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 0  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg0
crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 1  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg1
crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 2  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg2
crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 3  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg3
crw-rw 1 root cdrom 21, 4  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg4
crw-rw 1 root cdrom 21, 5  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg5

 You have multiple lun support compiled in?

Yes, I do.

Additional info (st and usb_storage):

# lsmod
Module  Size  Used by
st 30200  0
ipv6  195220  16
usbhid 21472  0
usb_storage60096  0
rtc 8472  0
ehci_hcd   29068  0
uhci_hcd   17864  0
sg 23788  0
usbcore   117040  5 usbhid,usb_storage,ehci_hcd,uhci_hcd
container   3164  0
processor  24024  0
thermal12920  0
button  5068  0



Thanks, Stefan



Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Stroller


On 3 Mar 2010, at 14:00, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk 
 wrote:
There seem to have been a few people posting with filesystem  
corruption in
the last week or two. It seems to be my turn, so I hope it isn't  
contagious.
The cause here is quite clear - whilst rummaging in the server  
cupboard

yesterday, power to the machine was accidentally disconnected.

...
 Sorry for your problems. I've had a rash of machine problems over
the last 6 weeks. No fun. I feel for you.

  In my most recent case what looked like a simple disk corruption
problem was really a prelude to the drive just plain going bad. Have
you tried smartctl to see what it says about the drive at this point?

  It would be even more frustrating to chroot in, do all the work,
think you had it fixed and then the underlying foundation of your
house crumbles beneath you 3 weeks from now.


I don't think this is a problem. I would love to know what others  
think of the `smartctl` output:



r...@sysresccd /root % smartctl -H /dev/sda
smartctl version 5.38 [i486-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce  
Allen

Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
Please note the following marginal Attributes:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME  FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE   
UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  9 Power_On_Seconds0x0012   001   001   020Old_age
Always   FAILING_NOW 44803h+12m+16s


r...@sysresccd /root % smartctl -i /dev/sda
smartctl version 5.38 [i486-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce  
Allen

Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Fujitsu MPA..MPG series
Device Model: FUJITSU MPF3204AT
Serial Number:05030567
Firmware Version: 0028
User Capacity:20,496,236,544 bytes
Device is:In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is:   5
ATA Standard is:  ATA/ATAPI-5 T13 1321D revision 1
Local Time is:Wed Mar  3 14:14:31 2010 UTC
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled

r...@sysresccd /root %


This looks to me like smartctl is going OMG! What an ancient drive!  
- it's a 20gig EIDE drive and if my pocket calculator is correct  
(44803/24/365), it's seen 5 years of active use - and that's the  
marginal attribute referred to.


Like I said, the power plug was accidentally pulled on this drive, so  
I'm inclined to attribute the corruption only to that, not to the  
drive actually failing.


The drive is in a computer that has rarely been turned off in the last  
couple of years, and is also in a warm environment, conditions which  
are ideal. I appreciate the latter seems unintuitive, but in fact  
studies have showed that drives in somewhat warm environments last  
longer than those that are cooled.


That it passes the SMART overall-health self-assessment test  
suggests to me that it is chugging away quite happily.


I would have dismissed your concerns were it not for the capitalised  
FAILING_NOW in the output. Like I say, I think this is just smartctl  
declaring OMG! this drive is old!, but I open this matter to the  
list for discussion (should you wish).


I think I'm actually nearly ready to migrate off this system. The  
power was actually pulled as I installed 3 new (to me) rackmount  
machines in the server cupboard - the plan is to have identical  
machines running RAID, so that in the case of ANY problems I have  
spares available. I have take nightly backups of the important data on  
this machine, however I'd prefer it to run just a couple or a few  
weeks longer to allow me to migrate at my own leisure.


Stroller.




Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:28:11PM +, Stroller wrote:
 from the output it looks like you are mounting by label? What if you
 edit fstab to point to the device name /dev/hd?? instead of
 LABEL=root? Check the filesystem label to make sure it is ok?
 
 Many thanks for this suggestion, however following it makes no  
 difference, except in the trivia that it says failed to open the  
 device '/dev/hda3': No such file or directory (instead of LABEL=...).

If you try to boot, after the failure to check rootfs, it should dump
you to a recovery console, what happens if you issue ls /dev ?

Also check dmesg? 

Cheers, 

W
-- 
Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
 et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton



Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:

 On 3 Mar 2010, at 14:00, Mark Knecht wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
 wrote:

 There seem to have been a few people posting with filesystem corruption
 in
 the last week or two. It seems to be my turn, so I hope it isn't
 contagious.
 The cause here is quite clear - whilst rummaging in the server cupboard
 yesterday, power to the machine was accidentally disconnected.

 ...
  Sorry for your problems. I've had a rash of machine problems over
 the last 6 weeks. No fun. I feel for you.

  In my most recent case what looked like a simple disk corruption
 problem was really a prelude to the drive just plain going bad. Have
 you tried smartctl to see what it says about the drive at this point?

  It would be even more frustrating to chroot in, do all the work,
 think you had it fixed and then the underlying foundation of your
 house crumbles beneath you 3 weeks from now.

 I don't think this is a problem. I would love to know what others think of
 the `smartctl` output:


 r...@sysresccd /root % smartctl -H /dev/sda
 smartctl version 5.38 [i486-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen
 Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/

 === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
 SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
 Please note the following marginal Attributes:
 ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED
  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  9 Power_On_Seconds        0x0012   001   001   020    Old_age   Always
 FAILING_NOW 44803h+12m+16s

 r...@sysresccd /root % smartctl -i /dev/sda
 smartctl version 5.38 [i486-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen
 Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/

 === START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
 Model Family:     Fujitsu MPA..MPG series
 Device Model:     FUJITSU MPF3204AT
 Serial Number:    05030567
 Firmware Version: 0028
 User Capacity:    20,496,236,544 bytes
 Device is:        In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
 ATA Version is:   5
 ATA Standard is:  ATA/ATAPI-5 T13 1321D revision 1
 Local Time is:    Wed Mar  3 14:14:31 2010 UTC
 SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
 SMART support is: Enabled

 r...@sysresccd /root %


 This looks to me like smartctl is going OMG! What an ancient drive! - it's
 a 20gig EIDE drive and if my pocket calculator is correct (44803/24/365),
 it's seen 5 years of active use - and that's the marginal attribute
 referred to.

 Like I said, the power plug was accidentally pulled on this drive, so I'm
 inclined to attribute the corruption only to that, not to the drive actually
 failing.

 The drive is in a computer that has rarely been turned off in the last
 couple of years, and is also in a warm environment, conditions which are
 ideal. I appreciate the latter seems unintuitive, but in fact studies have
 showed that drives in somewhat warm environments last longer than those that
 are cooled.

 That it passes the SMART overall-health self-assessment test suggests to
 me that it is chugging away quite happily.

 I would have dismissed your concerns were it not for the capitalised
 FAILING_NOW in the output. Like I say, I think this is just smartctl
 declaring OMG! this drive is old!, but I open this matter to the list for
 discussion (should you wish).

 I think I'm actually nearly ready to migrate off this system. The power was
 actually pulled as I installed 3 new (to me) rackmount machines in the
 server cupboard - the plan is to have identical machines running RAID, so
 that in the case of ANY problems I have spares available. I have take
 nightly backups of the important data on this machine, however I'd prefer it
 to run just a couple or a few weeks longer to allow me to migrate at my own
 leisure.

 Stroller.

I've had two machines go bad due to hard drive problems in the last 6
weeks. One drive was 4.5 years old, the other 6 years old. I have no
experience with smart. I'm just learning about it. However it is
generated by the microcontroller in the hard drive as per the view of
the drive manufacturer so if the drive is telling you it's failing
then...

My 4.5 year failure actually stopped producing smart output somewhere
along the way before it failed. The 6 year drive I wasn't using smart
at the time so I had no data from it but it was in an environment
where the UPS went through a lot of abuse.

I sounds like you have good backups so just make sure they are good
and do what you want.

- Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:26:46PM +, Stroller wrote:
 I don't think this is a problem. I would love to know what others  
 think of the `smartctl` output:
 
 
 r...@sysresccd /root % smartctl -H /dev/sda
 smartctl version 5.38 [i486-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce  
 Allen
 Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
 
 === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
 SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
 Please note the following marginal Attributes:
 ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME  FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE   
 UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
   9 Power_On_Seconds0x0012   001   001   020Old_age
 Always   FAILING_NOW 44803h+12m+16s

You can always run the smart long-test to double check. The
FAILING_NOW just indicates that the normalised value falls below the
threshold. For Power_On_Seconds, this usually just indicates that your
are way pass the warranty. If you really care about your data, swap it
out now or make frequent backups. Otherwise I don't see the harm of
keeping it until it actually dies. 

Cheers, 

W
-- 
Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
 et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton



[gentoo-user] Advice for 64-bit n00b?

2010-03-03 Thread Stroller

Hi there,

A new (to me) server has 64-bit CPUs. By my standards this is a REALLY  
NICE high specification machine (I appears to be 2 x dual-core), but  
in fact it's about 3 years old  is one of the earliest Intel Xeons  
that supports 64-bits / AMD64 / EMT64. I think it is 64-bit Pentium 4,  
rather than Core 2 architecture.


# cat /proc/cpuinfo | head -n 25
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 15
model   : 4
model name  : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz
stepping: 3
cpu MHz : 2992.346
cache size  : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 1
apicid  : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge  
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe  
syscall nx lm constant_tsc pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl cid cx16  
xtpr

bogomips: 5984.69
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 128
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:


I'm a bit confused by the 36-bit address size mentioned there, but I  
assume this is OK. The Gentoo wiki seems to confirm this CPU is 64- 
bit: http://tinyurl.com/klv7gc [1]


Is there anything I need to know about working with 64-bits / AMD64 /  
EMT64, seeing as I've never done so before?


I have started following the Gentoo Linux AMD64 Handbook, because the  
Quick Install Guide is described as x86. Having untarred the stage I  
am surprised to find a lib32 directory. I thought compatibility with  
32-bit binaries was optional. Or am I misunderstanding? This is going  
to be a headless server  I can't think that it'll need any binary  
packages - possibly the management utility for the RAID controller  
will be distributed as a binary, I'm not sure yet (the hardware RAID  
key was missing when I got this machine ☹)


I'm editing my make.conf and looked at the Gentoo wiki for Safe  
Cflags - it says 'CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'. But of course  
(according to make.conf.example) one shouldn't change CHOST on an  
installed system. Will the files in the stage 3 have been compiled  
using this CHOST?


Any pointers would be gratefully appreciated - I'm wondering if  
there's anything you guys all take for granted that I could mess up if  
I don't allow for it early enough in the installation process.


Thanks in advance for any comments,

Stroller.




[1] http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags/Intel#Xeon_w.2FEM64T_.28also_Pentium_4_P6xx_or_Celeron_M_5xx.29 
 


[gentoo-user] Re: Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com writes:

In my most recent case what looked like a simple disk corruption
 problem was really a prelude to the drive just plain going bad. Have
 you tried smartctl to see what it says about the drive at this point?

Sorry to butt in here... is that tool, smartctl in some pkg on portage?




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 09:29:43AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
 Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com writes:
 
 In my most recent case what looked like a simple disk corruption
  problem was really a prelude to the drive just plain going bad. Have
  you tried smartctl to see what it says about the drive at this point?
 
 Sorry to butt in here... is that tool, smartctl in some pkg on portage?
 

sys-app/smartmontools

W
-- 
Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
 et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton



Re: [gentoo-user] Advice for 64-bit n00b?

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 17:29:06 Stroller wrote:
 Hi there,
 
 A new (to me) server has 64-bit CPUs. By my standards this is a REALLY
 NICE high specification machine (I appears to be 2 x dual-core), but
 in fact it's about 3 years old  is one of the earliest Intel Xeons
 that supports 64-bits / AMD64 / EMT64. I think it is 64-bit Pentium 4,
 rather than Core 2 architecture.
 
 # cat /proc/cpuinfo | head -n 25
 processor   : 0
 vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
 cpu family  : 15
 model   : 4
 model name  : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz
 stepping: 3
 cpu MHz : 2992.346
 cache size  : 2048 KB
 physical id : 0
 siblings: 2
 core id : 0
 cpu cores   : 1
 apicid  : 0
 initial apicid  : 0
 fpu : yes
 fpu_exception   : yes
 cpuid level : 5
 wp  : yes
 flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
 mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe
 syscall nx lm constant_tsc pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl cid cx16
 xtpr
 bogomips: 5984.69
 clflush size: 64
 cache_alignment : 128
 address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
 power management:
 
 
 I'm a bit confused by the 36-bit address size mentioned there, but I
 assume this is OK. The Gentoo wiki seems to confirm this CPU is 64-
 bit: http://tinyurl.com/klv7gc [1]

that is correct


 
 Is there anything I need to know about working with 64-bits / AMD64 /
 EMT64, seeing as I've never done so before?

Nope, it's just another arch. The days of doing weird funky stuff to get amd64 
to work are long gone


 
 I have started following the Gentoo Linux AMD64 Handbook, because the
 Quick Install Guide is described as x86. Having untarred the stage I
 am surprised to find a lib32 directory. I thought compatibility with
 32-bit binaries was optional. Or am I misunderstanding? This is going
 to be a headless server  I can't think that it'll need any binary
 packages - possibly the management utility for the RAID controller
 will be distributed as a binary, I'm not sure yet (the hardware RAID
 key was missing when I got this machine ☹)
 
 I'm editing my make.conf and looked at the Gentoo wiki for Safe
 Cflags - it says 'CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'. But of course
 (according to make.conf.example) one shouldn't change CHOST on an
 installed system. Will the files in the stage 3 have been compiled
 using this CHOST?

Yes. If you used a recent amd64 stage, it will all be fine.
 
 Any pointers would be gratefully appreciated - I'm wondering if
 there's anything you guys all take for granted that I could mess up if
 I don't allow for it early enough in the installation process.

In make,conf, as long s you are using a reasonably recent gcc:

CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}


-march=native avoids all that tedious mucking about with trying to figure out 
what cpu type you should build for, and moves the heavy lifting off onto the 
compiler.



-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!

2010-03-03 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
 My pet peeve is Desktop. I have two monitors at work and use two X screens.
 KDE wants to create a Desktop and a Desktop-1 directory. I want it to just use
 the same set of files for both - background, icons, plasma widgets must be the
 same on both monitors, but actual app windows running there independent. This
 seems perfectly reasonable to me - e17 does it out the box - but thus far I
 have not found the magic voodoo spell that makes it happen.

Can you symlink Desktop-1 to Desktop? ( I only have 1 monitor and have
never tried this... so forgive me if it's a stupid idea)



Re: [gentoo-user] Internal DAT72 : HP C7438A

2010-03-03 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 03.03.2010 15:18, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
 Am 03.03.2010 14:47, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
 
 but you do get /dev/sgX devices?
 
 Yes.
 
 Looks like the four SATA-disks, one cdrom and the tapedrive (recognized
 as CDROM?):
 
 # ls -l /dev/sg?
 crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 0  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg0
 crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 1  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg1
 crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 2  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg2
 crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 3  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg3
 crw-rw 1 root cdrom 21, 4  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg4
 crw-rw 1 root cdrom 21, 5  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg5


After a reboot, with a tape inserted, I get:

# ls -l /dev/sg?
crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 0  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg0
crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 1  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg1
crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 2  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg2
crw-rw 1 root disk  21, 3  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg3
crw-rw 1 root cdrom 21, 4  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg4
crw-rw 1 root tape  21, 5  3. Mär 2010  /dev/sg5

and also

# ls -l /dev/st0*
crw-rw 1 root tape 9,  0  3. Mär 2010  /dev/st0
crw-rw 1 root tape 9, 96  3. Mär 2010  /dev/st0a
crw-rw 1 root tape 9, 32  3. Mär 2010  /dev/st0l
crw-rw 1 root tape 9, 64  3. Mär 2010  /dev/st0m

# ls -l /dev/nst0*
crw-rw 1 root tape 9, 128  3. Mär 2010  /dev/nst0
crw-rw 1 root tape 9, 224  3. Mär 2010  /dev/nst0a
crw-rw 1 root tape 9, 160  3. Mär 2010  /dev/nst0l
crw-rw 1 root tape 9, 192  3. Mär 2010  /dev/nst0m

I am able to write and read a tape, yes.

But dmesg still looks ugly!

stuff like --

usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk data transfer result 0x0
usb-storage: Attempting to get CSW...
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 13 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 13/13
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk status result = 0
usb-storage: Bulk Status S 0x53425355 T 0x2c67 R 0 Stat 0x0
usb-storage: scsi cmd done, result=0x0
usb-storage: *** thread sleeping.
usb-storage: queuecommand called
usb-storage: *** thread awakened.
usb-storage: Command WRITE_6 (6 bytes)
usb-storage:  0a 00 00 80 00 00
usb-storage: Bulk Command S 0x43425355 T 0x2c68 L 32768 F 0 Trg 0 LUN 0 CL 6
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 31 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 31/31
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_sglist: xfer 32768 bytes, 1 entries
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 32768/32768
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk data transfer result 0x0
usb-storage: Attempting to get CSW...
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 13 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 13/13
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk status result = 0
usb-storage: Bulk Status S 0x53425355 T 0x2c68 R 0 Stat 0x0
usb-storage: scsi cmd done, result=0x0
usb-storage: *** thread sleeping.
usb-storage: queuecommand called
usb-storage: *** thread awakened.
usb-storage: Command WRITE_6 (6 bytes)
usb-storage:  0a 00 00 80 00 00
usb-storage: Bulk Command S 0x43425355 T 0x2c69 L 32768 F 0 Trg 0 LUN 0 CL 6
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 31 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 31/31
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_sglist: xfer 32768 bytes, 1 entries


Not very trustworthy?

S



Re: [gentoo-user] Advice/best practices for a new Gentoo installation

2010-03-03 Thread Alex Schuster
Neil Bothwick writes:

 On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:52:55 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
   The data I've seen indicates that ext2 is fastest, that's what I
   use.
  
  I thought the small files of the portage tree especially profit from
  the notail option in reiserfs?
 
 They benefit compared with using reiser with tail-packing.

Oh my. I have it the other way around, and never even thought much about 
what this does.

  Did you change the block size?
 
 I had to change both the block size and blocks per inode, otherwise I
 would run out of inodes on a 1GB filesystem. You have to admire the
 user-friendliness of ext!

I only wished I could add more inodes after all are out, because this 
happens quite frequently to me. But yes, it's nice I can specify this at 
all.


   There's no need for journalling on the portage tree, it's small
   enough to fsck quickly and if it does get broken, reformat and
   resync.
  
  Would the journaling overhead be noticeable?
  I also had used ext2 for my portage tree first, then I read somewhere
  that reiserfs would be the best. BTW, I have distfiles and pkgdir
  somewhere else, if not the fsck would not be so fast.
 
 It's certainly noticeable compared with ext3. Many benchmarks do show
 ext2 to be the fastest filesystem, probably because of the lack of
 journalling overhead.

When I saw some, it was maybe 15% difference, and that probably due to 
writes I assume. The portage tree is written during sync only, and then I 
do not care about speed. But would accessing lots and lots of small files 
be slowed down by journaling?

 Like you, I have $DISTDIR and $PKGDIR elsewhere, those files really
 should not be mixed in with the portage tree.
 
  Just for fun, I just copied my $PORTDIR into my tmpfs, emerge -DpN
  @system @world takes between 81 and 53 seconds. With reiserfs, I get
  130 seconds first ($PORTDIR was unmounted first and mounted again to
  clear the caches), and 57 seconds in the second attempt.
  
  I had expected that tmpfs would be even faster. I think I just keep
  it the way it is now.
 
 The exact same thought occurred to me. With a local tree to sync from,
 tmpfs seemed a good choice (you could sync it from /etc/conf.d/local)
 but it seems like it is not worth bothering with.

I would need more memory for that, I'm not at amd64 yet. But I probably 
should migrate anyway, and get another 4GB of memory.

 I'll try a reiser3
 filesystem without tail packing to see if it beats ext2.

I backed up my portage tree, re-created the reiserfs partition, and 
mounted without notail option. The same emerge command now takes about 
three minutes... no, on 2nd try it's five. Hmm... ah, clementine is 
indexing files. Why does it do this, I did not change files. Oh, and it 
has indexed all of my /data/mp3, while I only gave it four subfolders to 
index. Why does no audio player just accept my choices for what the 
collection is, and add other stuff?

The next test gives 93 seconds, that's nice.

Wonko



Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!

2010-03-03 Thread Alex Schuster
Mick writes:

 On Monday 01 March 2010 16:08:05 Alex Schuster wrote:

  And another weekend of KDE4 trouble. I rebooted after some upgrades,
  along those were Qt and MySQL. Now, plasma-desktop crashed, also
  when restarting it on the command line.
 
 [snip ...]
 
  Sorry for the whining,
 
 Nah!  It's good to vent every now and then.  :-))

Thanks! sniff

 Is it perhaps that you have a very complex/overloaded plasma set up?

Not really.
I would like to, though, this stuff is actually quite nice. I changed my 
setup to have a different activity for each desktop, and I like it. I hope 
this stuff becomes more stable and usable soon. And I am missing features. 
Why can't I tell a plasmoid to appear on several desktops / activities I 
select, and not only on one? Why can't I insert another activity/desktop 
between the ones I already have? At the moment, I think I would have to 
close all plasmoids and re-open them on the new activity I want them to 
be, this is annoying.
But again, I like the whole idea, it's only not perfect yet.

 I've updated KDE on two machines and went swimmingly well.  On one
 machine I first removed qt3 and then had no problems whatsoever.  On
 the other I can't recall what I did with qt3 ...
 
 Other than that, I've noticed this sort of behaviour in the past with
 KDE2 and KDE3 when I was trying to use KDE while major apps were being
 updated.

This might have been the problem. But I would not like to log out for 
that, I just do the world updates from time to time when the machine has 
not much else to do, but I like to keep my desktop session running.

Wonko



Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Stroller


Many thanks for your help, Willie!


On 3 Mar 2010, at 15:18, Willie Wong wrote:

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:28:11PM +, Stroller wrote:

from the output it looks like you are mounting by label? What if you
edit fstab to point to the device name /dev/hd?? instead of
LABEL=root? Check the filesystem label to make sure it is ok?


Many thanks for this suggestion, however following it makes no
difference, except in the trivia that it says failed to open the
device '/dev/hda3': No such file or directory (instead of  
LABEL=...).


If you try to boot, after the failure to check rootfs, it should dump
you to a recovery console, what happens if you issue ls /dev ?


About 13 items. Is this unlucky?

http://linux.stroller.uk.eu.org/fs-corruption-dev.png


Also check dmesg?


I don't think this gives any clues:

http://linux.stroller.uk.eu.org/fs-corruption-dmesg.png

Stroller.




Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Stroller


On 3 Mar 2010, at 14:01, Mick wrote:

... Once or twice
things went hairy and I would get a message similar to yours.  On
these rare occasions I booted with a LiveCD and with the partitions
unmounted I ran --check, then --fix-fixable and finally
--rebuild-tree.  You may want to use an external drive with dd to
image the current / partition and do all your recovery work on that.
If you don't care too much about the risk of catastrophic failure then
just run --rebuild-tree with a LiveCD and see what you get.


That's a great idea. I'm (now) religious about backing up my  
customers' computers, often using dd like this, but for some reason it  
hadn't yet occurred to me today.


Stroller.




Re: [gentoo-user] Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-03 Thread Alex Schuster
Alan McKinnon writes:

 On Wednesday 03 March 2010 14:21:23 Neil Bothwick wrote:

  That's right, they should both be in /var.
 
 I concur. /usr has a long tradition is Unix of often being mounted
 read-only (think thin clients that mount it over NFS).

Any idea why it's different with Gentoo in the first place? /usr also 
always sounded wrong to me for the portage tree.
And for other things. Shouldn't /usr/src go somewhere into /var? And 
shouldn't /usr/share/config stuff be in /etc?

 My set up is:
 
 portage:  /var/portage/
 my overlay:   /var/portage/local/alan/
 layman:   /var/portage/local/layman/*
 
 As portage is hard-coded to not fiddle with $PORTDIR/local/, this works
 well for me and every ebuild on the system is under one mount point.

Where do you have the distfiles? I now have it like this:

/var/portage:distfiles, pkgdir and tree
/var/portage/tree:   portage tree (on extra partition)
/var/portage/layman: layman
/var/portage/local:  my ebuilds

Wonko



Re: [gentoo-user] Advice/best practices for a new Gentoo installation

2010-03-03 Thread Alex Schuster
Willie Wong writes:

 On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:52:55PM +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:

  I thought the small files of the portage tree especially profit from
  the notail option in reiserfs? Did you change the block size?
 
 You mean the other way around, right?

Oh dear. Yes. Thanks.

 reiser defaults to tail-packing,
 which can cause problems with GRUB and LILO, which is why notail is an
 option which turns off tail-packing for those crazy enough to use
 reiser on /boot.
 
 If you use notail on the portage tree, you get rid of that advantage,
 then Neil is absolutely correct: there's not too much point in
 journaling the portage tree, and if you actively make reiser
 not-competitive on the storage-space direction, the only metric left
 to compare is speed, and ext2 is faster.
 
 Incidentally, if you are willing to sacrifice speed for space, then a
 sparsefile for /usr/portage may also be an option.

I had this once on a smaller machine, but now I'd prefer it the other way 
around, there's plenty of space available. I have 15G for distfiles and 
pkgdir, so I don't worry about some 100MB for the portage tree.

Wonko



Re: [gentoo-user] Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-03 Thread stosss
I am new to Gentoo and just watching this discussion.

So why does stage three put portage in

/usr



Re: [gentoo-user] Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 18:33:52 Alex Schuster wrote:
 Alan McKinnon writes:
  On Wednesday 03 March 2010 14:21:23 Neil Bothwick wrote:
   That's right, they should both be in /var.
  
  I concur. /usr has a long tradition is Unix of often being mounted
  read-only (think thin clients that mount it over NFS).
 
 Any idea why it's different with Gentoo in the first place? /usr also
 always sounded wrong to me for the portage tree.
 And for other things. Shouldn't /usr/src go somewhere into /var? And
 shouldn't /usr/share/config stuff be in /etc?

/usr/src/ is the traditional place for kernel header files. They are intended 
to be static, change seldom, and definitely not something that users can 
change. Normally, root would update them when needed, and stuff can then build 
against them.

/usr/share/config/ is an upstream thing and if you follow FHS then /etc/ is a 
better place. But Gentoo follows upstream as much as possible so this one gets 
left as-is.

NB: Gentoo only follows FHS when it suits Gentoo devs to do it :-) The 
reasoning offered is usually that Gentoo is a source distro and therefore has 
little needs of FHS, which does tend towards compatibility between binary 
distros

 
  My set up is:
  
  portage:/var/portage/
  my overlay: /var/portage/local/alan/
  layman: /var/portage/local/layman/*
  
  As portage is hard-coded to not fiddle with $PORTDIR/local/, this works
  well for me and every ebuild on the system is under one mount point.
 
 Where do you have the distfiles? I now have it like this:

/var/distfiles/
/var/packages/
/var/rpm/

I do it this way as I am confident portage will leave /var/portage/local/ 
alone, I have no confidence it will do the same for the above three. Plus, 
those dirs can get big, and I keep the portage volume small and tight for 
performance reasons

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 17:48:39 Paul Hartman wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com 
wrote:
  My pet peeve is Desktop. I have two monitors at work and use two X
  screens. KDE wants to create a Desktop and a Desktop-1 directory. I want
  it to just use the same set of files for both - background, icons,
  plasma widgets must be the same on both monitors, but actual app windows
  running there independent. This seems perfectly reasonable to me - e17
  does it out the box - but thus far I have not found the magic voodoo
  spell that makes it happen.
 
 Can you symlink Desktop-1 to Desktop? ( I only have 1 monitor and have
 never tried this... so forgive me if it's a stupid idea)

Dunno, I'm too scared to try :-)

I remember the devastation that occurred the last time I deleted 
Desktop-1.


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 18:43:55 stosss wrote:
 I am new to Gentoo and just watching this discussion.
 
 So why does stage three put portage in
 
 /usr


I'm not sure this will mean much to you, but the REAL reasons are that

1. It is a historical artifact that no-one thus far saw fit to change,
2. FreeBSD does it that way.


Yes, #2 is for real. Read the ancient histories of where Gentoo originally 
came from as written by drobbins to find out why



-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] vBulletin site causes Konqueror to hang

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 03:54:06 Dale wrote:
 I did click around on the site earlier but I'm not registered to do 
 anything else.  I just went back and tried to navigate a bit more.  I 
 went to a thread then clicked to go back to the main page.  Dicks hat 
 band could not have done it better.  That thing locked up like a whore 
 on the front row.  lol  It was a 53% loading and trying to get something 
 that is 18.9Kib.  It's been a couple minutes now and it is still sitting 
 there.  I'm thinking that only a kill -9 will make this whore move 
 again.  Please excuse my humor.
 
 So, whatever it is, it affects us both.


I fear the worst :-)

I see KDE-4.4.1 just showed up in the tree and the Changelog has some 
interesting javascript-related bugs fixed. So what I'm gonna do is rebuild 
this latest KDE and see if that makes a difference. If not, disable $STUFF one 
at a time. If that doesn't work, I shall have to change a 6 year browsing 
habit :-(




-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 13:27:45 Alex Schuster wrote:
  On Monday 01 March 2010 18:08:05 Alex Schuster wrote:
   On the other hand, from time to time I have show-stoppers, and then I
   cannot use kmail, or no KDE4 at all. And have to invest time to solve
   this. And there are these annoying things. Like Amarok being very
   unstable, and taking 5 minutes to start. What the heck is it doing in
   this time?
 
  
 
  Fuck knows what amarok-2x does for the first 5 minutes. I think On my
  system it scans the music directory, presumably to find updates that
  happened when amarok was not running. Fair enough, can't argue that,
  but why is it so *slow*???
 
 Yes, it scans the collection, I just verified that by removing a folder 
 from my collection. Start-up takes 7 minutes, I guess this also slows down 
 my KDE4 start-up even further (strigi also scans some stuff for about a 
 minute, along this music files I did not touch in any way). So when I save 
 my KDE session I have to remember to quit amarok before that. Of course, I 
 also have to remember to start amarok some time after I logged in, so I 
 can play music when I want without having to wait 7 minutes first.
 
 This does not feel right...
 
 BTW, a find /data/mp3 -type d takes about a minute. Checking the date of 
 the directories to verify they did not alter since the last scan should 
 not take that much longer.
 
 Ah, I see the problem. It mainly scans /data/mp3/incoming, a directory I 
 have NOT selected as collection folder (but most other directories in 
 /data/mp3 are selected). Still, those files do not show up in my 
 collection, which is fine - some time ago amarok did index all in 
 /data/mp3, even if a directory was not selected.

I wonder if amarok would not be better off using the strigi/nepomuk indexing 
function, instead of trying to be real clever and doing it itself.

OTOH, that might just resurrect the mother of all threads we had recently - 
the one about the pros and cons of nepomuk and semantic-desktop :-)



-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



[gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Grant Edwards
When upgrading a machine today, I saw a notice that mythtv 0.21 has
now been hardmasked.  I think it's because it depends on an obsolte
version of Qt.  Don't get me started on the royal PITA of requiring
that Qt be installed for a backend-only setup on a server.

Since 0.21 and 0.23 is hardmasked, and mythv 0.22 is unstable on
everything except the amd64 platform, what's an X86 user to do?

-- 
Grant Edwards   grant.b.edwardsYow! My face is new, my
  at   license is expired, and I'm
  gmail.comunder a doctor's care




Re: [gentoo-user] Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-03 Thread Stroller


On 3 Mar 2010, at 16:33, Alex Schuster wrote:

Alan McKinnon writes:
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 14:21:23 Neil Bothwick wrote:


That's right, they should both be in /var.


I concur. /usr has a long tradition is Unix of often being mounted
read-only (think thin clients that mount it over NFS).


Any idea why it's different with Gentoo in the first place? /usr also
always sounded wrong to me for the portage tree.


It probably just goes back to a snap descision by Daniel Robbins a  
decade (or nearly) ago.


At one time he wasn't intending to distribute in the same way -  
Portage evolved from a script that he wrote to help him build a binary  
distro he was planning, so perhaps /usr/portage wasn't intended to be  
installed on users' systems (only on his own machine).


Stroller.




Re: [gentoo-user] Advice for 64-bit n00b?

2010-03-03 Thread Stroller


On 3 Mar 2010, at 15:29, Stroller wrote:

...
I have started following the Gentoo Linux AMD64 Handbook, because  
the Quick Install Guide is described as x86. Having untarred the  
stage I am surprised to find a lib32 directory. I thought  
compatibility with 32-bit binaries was optional. Or am I  
misunderstanding? This is going to be a headless server  I can't  
think that it'll need any binary packages - possibly the management  
utility for the RAID controller will be distributed as a binary, I'm  
not sure yet (the hardware RAID key was missing when I got this  
machine ☹)



Further to Alan's reply, I've proceeded a little further.

I'm onto section 2.3: Changing profiles, where it says:
  If you want to have a pure 64-bit environment, with no 32-bit  
applications or libraries, you should use a non-multilib profile.


See my comments in the quoted above. It shouldn't be too expensive to  
enable the RAID in this machine (which is on the mainboard, but  
requires a little hardware PCB key to be fitted). That's a Dell  
PERC4, which AFAICT is a rebadged LSI megaraid.


This post [1] http://tinyurl.com/3dzcl9 referrs to the management  
utility thus: MegaCLI comes as a RPM containing only a single  
statically linked 32-bit Linux binary, however `eix mega` suggests  
there may be alternatives, such as `megactl` [2]


My immediate thought when reading the handbook was that it's best  
and cleanest and more right to only have 64-bit libraries on a 64- 
bit system, but this need for the RAID management utility is making me  
wonder if that would be cutting off my nose to spite my face.


Thoughts?

Stroller.




[1] 
http://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/blog/index.php?/archives/4-LSIlogic-MegaRAID-SAS-and-the-self-explaining-CLI.html

[2] http://sourceforge.net/projects/megactl/




Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:16:50PM +, Stroller wrote:
 
 Many thanks for your help, Willie!
 
 About 13 items. Is this unlucky?
 
 http://linux.stroller.uk.eu.org/fs-corruption-dev.png
 

Okay, something is screwed up with udev. Is udev started? Is it
upgraded recently? Any config files in /etc that needs updating? Is
udev directory in /etc okay? 

At this point I don't think your problem is necessarily with the
harddrive itself: I think we now know why fsck cannot open file or
device. 

Check /var/log/emerge.log or the portage elogs. Did you upgrade
baselayout recently? 

Good luck, 

W

-- 
Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
 et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton



[gentoo-user] Is the move perl-5.10 involved here

2010-03-03 Thread Harry Putnam
I'm having trouble when revdep-rebuild tries to emerge
dev-perl/DBD-mysql

I can't really make much sense of the output but I see it involves
scripting from perl-5.8.8 

I've included the tail of the emerge below, and below that the output
of emerge --info =dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3 as suggested by emerge output.
 
I did run `USE=build emerge -v DBD-mysql' as suggested somewhere in
the ouput.  The tail below is from that:

[...]

 Emerging (1 of 1) dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3
 * DBD-mysql-4.013.tar.gz RMD160 SHA1 SHA256 size ;-) ...   [ 
ok ]
 * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ...[ 
ok ]
 * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ...   [ 
ok ]
 * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ...  [ 
ok ]
 cfg-update-1.8.2-r1: Checksum index is up-to-date ...
 * CPV:  dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3
 * REPO: gentoo
 * USE:  build elibc_glibc kernel_linux userland_GNU x86
 Unpacking source...
 Unpacking DBD-mysql-4.013.tar.gz to 
 /var/tmp/portage/dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3/work
 Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3/work
 Compiling source in 
 /var/tmp/portage/dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3/work/DBD-mysql-4.013 ...
 * Using ExtUtils::MakeMaker
Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at 
/usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i686-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 223.
 object version 1.609 does not match $::VERSION %_ at 
/usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i686-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 223.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux/DBI.pm line 263.
Compilation failed in require at 
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux/DBI/DBD.pm line 3225.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux/DBI/DBD.pm line 3226.
Compilation failed in require at Makefile.PL line 24.
 * ERROR: dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3 failed:
 *   Unable to build! (are you using USE=build?)
 * 
 * Call stack:
 * ebuild.sh, line   54:  Called src_compile
 *   environment, line 2896:  Called perl-module_src_compile
 *   environment, line 2585:  Called perl-module_src_prep
 *   environment, line 2657:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *   perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr INSTALLDIRS=vendor 
INSTALLMAN3DIR='none' DESTDIR=${D} ${myconf}  ${pm_echovar} || die 
Unable to build! (are you using USE=\build\?);

----   ---=---   -   
Below here is the output of emerge --info =dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3
----   ---=---   -  

Portage 2.1.7.17 (default/linux/x86/10.0, gcc-4.4.3, glibc-2.11-r1, 
2.6.32-gentoo-r1 i686)
=
System Settings
=
System uname: 
Linux-2.6.32-gentoo-r1-i686-Intel-R-_Celeron-R-_CPU_3.06GHz-with-gentoo-2.0.1
Timestamp of tree: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:30:01 +
app-shells/bash: 4.1_p2
dev-lang/python: 2.6.4-r1, 3.1.1-r1
dev-util/cmake:  2.8.0-r2
sys-apps/baselayout: 2.0.1
sys-apps/openrc: 0.6.0-r1
sys-apps/sandbox:2.2
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.65
sys-devel/automake:  1.10.3, 1.11.1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.20-r1
sys-devel/gcc:   4.3.4, 4.4.3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.4.1
sys-devel/libtool:   2.2.6b
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.32
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=x86 ~x86
ACCEPT_LICENSE=* -...@eula
CBUILD=i686-pc-linux-gnu
CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe
CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
CONFIG_PROTECT=/etc /usr/share/X11/xkb
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/env.d /etc/fonts/fonts.conf 
/etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d /etc/terminfo
CXXFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe
DISTDIR=/usr/portage/distfiles
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--with-bdeps y
FEATURES=assume-digests distlocks fixpackages news parallel-fetch 
protect-owned sandbox sfperms strict unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch
GENTOO_MIRRORS=http://gentoo.chem.wisc.edu/gentoo/  
ftp://gentoo.chem.wisc.edu/gentoo/  ftp://mirror.datapipe.net/gentoo/   
http://mirrors.acm.cs.rpi.edu/gentoo/  ftp://gentoo.cites.uiuc.edu/pub/gentoo/  
ftp://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/pub/linux/gentoo/  http://gentoo.cs.lewisu.edu/gentoo/  
ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/gentoo/;
LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1
PKGDIR=/usr/portage/packages
PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT=/
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS=--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress 
--force --whole-file --delete --stats --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles 
--exclude=/local --exclude=/packages
PORTAGE_TMPDIR=/var/tmp
PORTDIR=/usr/portage
SYNC=rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage
USE=X Xaw3d acl acpi alsa apache2 aspell berkdb branding bzip2 cairo cli 
cracklib cscope cups cxx dbus dri emacs exif ffmpeg fortran gdbm gif gpm hal 
iconv jpeg lock logrotate mbox modules mudflap mysql ncurses nls nptl nptlonly 
openmp pam pcre pdf perl png pppd python readline reflection samba sasl session 
spl ssl startup-notification subversion svg 

[gentoo-user] Boost emerge: bjam-1.41 using 100% CPU

2010-03-03 Thread Grant Edwards
I did an update to day on two systems.  Both are installed
boost-1.41.0-r3, and both paused during the install phase for about
ten minutes with bjam-1.41 using 100% of the CPU time.

Eventually, things become un-jammed and various files get copied to
the proper destiantions.

Is this behavior normal?

-- 
Grant Edwards   grant.b.edwardsYow! It's OKAY -- I'm an
  at   INTELLECTUAL, too.
  gmail.com





Re: [gentoo-user] Is the move perl-5.10 involved here

2010-03-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:21:35AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
snip
  Unpacking source...
  Unpacking DBD-mysql-4.013.tar.gz to 
  /var/tmp/portage/dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3/work
  Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3/work
  Compiling source in 
  /var/tmp/portage/dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3/work/DBD-mysql-4.013 ...
  * Using ExtUtils::MakeMaker
 Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at 
 /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i686-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 223.
  object version 1.609 does not match $::VERSION %_ at 
 /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i686-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 223.
 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux/DBI.pm line 263.
 Compilation failed in require at 
 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux/DBI/DBD.pm line 3225.
 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux/DBI/DBD.pm line 3226.

Have you tried perl-cleaner?

http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/perl/perl-cleaner.xml

W
-- 
Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
 et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton



Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!

2010-03-03 Thread stosss
 I wonder if amarok would not be better off using the strigi/nepomuk indexing
 function, instead of trying to be real clever and doing it itself.

I think Amarok uses MySQL.



Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!

2010-03-03 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
 I wonder if amarok would not be better off using the strigi/nepomuk indexing
 function, instead of trying to be real clever and doing it itself.

AFAIK it is on the Amarok to-do list now that the speed is good enough
to replace mysql, but nobody has volunteered to take on the challenge
yet.

I think there's also the potential problem of users who don't install
or enable the indexing/semantic-desktop stuff might not be able to use
Amarok then...



Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem corruption - reiserfs? - won't boot, filesystem couldn't be fixed :(

2010-03-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:16:50 +, Stroller wrote:

  If you try to boot, after the failure to check rootfs, it should dump
  you to a recovery console, what happens if you issue ls /dev ?  
 
 About 13 items. Is this unlucky?
 
 http://linux.stroller.uk.eu.org/fs-corruption-dev.png

Is that the same as you see in the dev directory of your root filesystem
when you boot from a live CD? It looks like udev may not be running for
some reason.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!

2010-03-03 Thread Alex Schuster
Alan McKinnon writes:

 On Wednesday 03 March 2010 13:27:45 Alex Schuster wrote:

[RANT RANT RANT]

  Ah, I see the problem. It mainly scans /data/mp3/incoming, a
  directory I have NOT selected as collection folder (but most other
  directories in /data/mp3 are selected). Still, those files do not
  show up in my collection, which is fine - some time ago amarok did
  index all in /data/mp3, even if a directory was not selected.

I investigated this further. Amarok seems to look for all playlists below 
/data/mp3, and then looks up all of their files. No idea why.

 I wonder if amarok would not be better off using the strigi/nepomuk
 indexing function, instead of trying to be real clever and doing it
 itself.

Strigi also keeps indexing parts of my /data/mp3 stuff with EVERY login.

 OTOH, that might just resurrect the mother of all threads we had
 recently - the one about the pros and cons of nepomuk and
 semantic-desktop :-)

I am pro, I like it, but again it seems those things are not yet working 
right. Strigi indexes stuff over and over again at every login. virtuoso-t 
then also runs for a while and hogs resources. dbus-daemon uses 10-15 
percent of CPU time according to top. Should it do this?

I enabled auto-login for KDE, so when I boot the system, at least things 
are already indexed when I start working with it.

Now I'm going to emerge KDE-4.4.1, let's see what this will change.

Wonko



Re: [gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
 When upgrading a machine today, I saw a notice that mythtv 0.21 has
 now been hardmasked.  I think it's because it depends on an obsolte
 version of Qt.  Don't get me started on the royal PITA of requiring
 that Qt be installed for a backend-only setup on a server.

 Since 0.21 and 0.23 is hardmasked, and mythv 0.22 is unstable on
 everything except the amd64 platform, what's an X86 user to do?

 --
 Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! My face is new, my

I think this is being handled badly but that sort of the way it is for
a few days anyway. Shortly 0.22 will be unmasked as stable if it isn't
already, but there are LOTS and LOTS of things we need to be careful
about when changing or the Myth database will get messed up and
possibly be unusable.

It seems that a few devs can decide that something like qt3 is enough
to force people to move forward. I've got 5 x64/amd64 frontends plus a
backend PPC server. I'm not convinced they thought about this sort of
mixed environment issue but that's the way it is.

I am expecting that it's going to be a bad couple of weeks

I'd like to find some sort of sunset overlay for 0.21 but I haven't
looked. Let me know if you go that way.

- Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:52:46 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:

 Since 0.21 and 0.23 is hardmasked, and mythv 0.22 is unstable on
 everything except the amd64 platform, what's an X86 user to do?

It may be in a testing ebuild but it is far from unstable:

% ssh myt...@agrajag uptime
   17:58:52 up 51 days, 16:25,  1 user,  load average: 0.17, 0.10, 0.09


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Apple I (c) Copyright 1767, Sir Isaac Newton.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:59:32PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 % ssh myt...@agrajag uptime
17:58:52 up 51 days, 16:25,  1 user,  load average: 0.17, 0.10, 0.09

You call it Agrajag and talk about stability? You big tempter of fate
you.

:)

W

-- 
Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
 et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton



[gentoo-user] Re: No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2010-03-03, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 When upgrading a machine today, I saw a notice that mythtv 0.21 has
 now been hardmasked. ??I think it's because it depends on an obsolte
 version of Qt. ??Don't get me started on the royal PITA of requiring
 that Qt be installed for a backend-only setup on a server.

 Since 0.21 and 0.23 is hardmasked, and mythv 0.22 is unstable on
 everything except the amd64 platform, what's an X86 user to do?

 I think this is being handled badly but that sort of the way it is for
 a few days anyway. Shortly 0.22 will be unmasked as stable if it isn't
 already, but there are LOTS and LOTS of things we need to be careful
 about when changing or the Myth database will get messed up and
 possibly be unusable.

I read the instructions for fixing the broken database encoding, but
it appears mine is fine -- so updating to 0.22 won't be quite as
painful as it might have been.  I'll still have to re-build the
frontend, since 0.22 doesn't use a compatible protocol.

 It seems that a few devs can decide that something like qt3 is enough
 to force people to move forward. I've got 5 x64/amd64 frontends plus
 a backend PPC server. I'm not convinced they thought about this sort
 of mixed environment issue but that's the way it is.

 I am expecting that it's going to be a bad couple of weeks

 I'd like to find some sort of sunset overlay for 0.21 but I haven't
 looked. Let me know if you go that way.

I'll probably try upgrading to 0.22.

-- 
Grant Edwards   grant.b.edwardsYow! We're going to a
  at   new disco!
  gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 2010-03-03, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 When upgrading a machine today, I saw a notice that mythtv 0.21 has
 now been hardmasked. ??I think it's because it depends on an obsolte
 version of Qt. ??Don't get me started on the royal PITA of requiring
 that Qt be installed for a backend-only setup on a server.

 Since 0.21 and 0.23 is hardmasked, and mythv 0.22 is unstable on
 everything except the amd64 platform, what's an X86 user to do?

 I think this is being handled badly but that sort of the way it is for
 a few days anyway. Shortly 0.22 will be unmasked as stable if it isn't
 already, but there are LOTS and LOTS of things we need to be careful
 about when changing or the Myth database will get messed up and
 possibly be unusable.

 I read the instructions for fixing the broken database encoding, but
 it appears mine is fine -- so updating to 0.22 won't be quite as
 painful as it might have been.  I'll still have to re-build the
 frontend, since 0.22 doesn't use a compatible protocol.

You are already using latin1 throughout your database? You are lucky
if that's true. It isn't for me but I've been running myth for about 4
years now.

I would suggest that if you use __any__ remote frontends and there is
any chance of someone else powering one up and using Myth then you
should first emerge -C mythtv on ALL frontend-only machines, upgrade
your server, emerge mythtv-0.22 on one frontend, make sure it works,
and then move on with any other machine.

Good luck and report back how it goes!

- Mark

SNIP

 I'll probably try upgrading to 0.22.

 --
 Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! We're going to a
                                  at               new disco!
                              gmail.com






Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 19:32:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com 
wrote:
  I wonder if amarok would not be better off using the strigi/nepomuk
  indexing function, instead of trying to be real clever and doing it
  itself.
 
 AFAIK it is on the Amarok to-do list now that the speed is good enough
 to replace mysql, but nobody has volunteered to take on the challenge
 yet.
 
 I think there's also the potential problem of users who don't install
 or enable the indexing/semantic-desktop stuff might not be able to use
 Amarok then...

It could be a build-time option, giving the user a choice


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 19:30:56 stosss wrote:
  I wonder if amarok would not be better off using the strigi/nepomuk
  indexing function, instead of trying to be real clever and doing it
  itself.
 
 I think Amarok uses MySQL.

Amarok definitely uses MySQL, but that's the storage function, we are talking 
about the search function. 

It uses MySQL in the most brain-dead way anyone ever heard of, a way that no-
one in their right mind would consider even half-way sane.

It *requires* you to jump through interminable loops at build-time because it 
wants, wait for it, shared embedded libraries. I mean, wtf? That's not 
something MySQL was built to do. It's like having sex to preserve virginity

Then, to top it all, the Qt db libs get used wrongly too, causing the db to 
... not work.

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] Advice for 64-bit n00b?

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 19:04:45 Stroller wrote:
 On 3 Mar 2010, at 15:29, Stroller wrote:
  ...
  I have started following the Gentoo Linux AMD64 Handbook, because
  the Quick Install Guide is described as x86. Having untarred the
  stage I am surprised to find a lib32 directory. I thought
  compatibility with 32-bit binaries was optional. Or am I
  misunderstanding? This is going to be a headless server  I can't
  think that it'll need any binary packages - possibly the management
  utility for the RAID controller will be distributed as a binary, I'm
  not sure yet (the hardware RAID key was missing when I got this
  machine ☹)
 
 Further to Alan's reply, I've proceeded a little further.
 
 I'm onto section 2.3: Changing profiles, where it says:
If you want to have a pure 64-bit environment, with no 32-bit
 applications or libraries, you should use a non-multilib profile.
 
 See my comments in the quoted above. It shouldn't be too expensive to
 enable the RAID in this machine (which is on the mainboard, but
 requires a little hardware PCB key to be fitted). That's a Dell
 PERC4, which AFAICT is a rebadged LSI megaraid.
 
 This post [1] http://tinyurl.com/3dzcl9 referrs to the management
 utility thus: MegaCLI comes as a RPM containing only a single
 statically linked 32-bit Linux binary, however `eix mega` suggests
 there may be alternatives, such as `megactl` [2]
 
 My immediate thought when reading the handbook was that it's best
 and cleanest and more right to only have 64-bit libraries on a 64-
 bit system, but this need for the RAID management utility is making me
 wonder if that would be cutting off my nose to spite my face.

It has a single statically linked binary. Which probably means it already 
contains everything you will need and will run just fine. No need to build 
everything multilib; if you do need a 32bit lib, just install the appropriate 
emul-x86-linux package.

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 18:52:46 Grant Edwards wrote:
 When upgrading a machine today, I saw a notice that mythtv 0.21 has
 now been hardmasked.  I think it's because it depends on an obsolte
 version of Qt.  Don't get me started on the royal PITA of requiring
 that Qt be installed for a backend-only setup on a server.
 
 Since 0.21 and 0.23 is hardmasked, and mythv 0.22 is unstable on
 everything except the amd64 platform, what's an X86 user to do?

Move the needed Qt-3 ebuilds to your local private overlay along with the 
mythtv ebuilds, unmask mythtv, continue as normal.


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



[gentoo-user] 2.6.31-gentoo-r10 kernel segfaults on shutdown

2010-03-03 Thread Mick
Can you make any sense of this?
===
kernel BUG at kernel/time/clockevents.c:262!
invalid opcode:  [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[snip ...]

note: halt[12361] exited with preempt_count 2
/etc/init.d/shutdown.sh: line 9: 12361 Segmentation fault  /sbin/halt 
${opts}
===
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 20:23:01 Willie Wong wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:59:32PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
  % ssh myt...@agrajag uptime
  
 17:58:52 up 51 days, 16:25,  1 user,  load average: 0.17, 0.10, 0.09
 
 You call it Agrajag and talk about stability? You big tempter of fate
 you.


Wasn't Agrajag the toothless wonder that kept getting accidentally killed by 
Arthur Dent?


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



[gentoo-user] Re: No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2010-03-03, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Grant Edwards

 I read the instructions for fixing the broken database encoding, but
 it appears mine is fine -- so updating to 0.22 won't be quite as
 painful as it might have been. ??I'll still have to re-build the
 frontend, since 0.22 doesn't use a compatible protocol.

 You are already using latin1 throughout your database?

Apparently:

$ mysql -umythtv -p mythconverg -e 'status;'
Enter password: 
--
mysql  Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.84, for pc-linux-gnu (i686) using readline 6.0

Connection id:  106
Current database:   mythconverg
Current user:   myt...@localhost
SSL:Not in use
Current pager:  stdout
Using outfile:  ''
Using delimiter:;
Server version: 5.0.84-log Gentoo Linux mysql-5.0.84-r1
Protocol version:   10
Connection: Localhost via UNIX socket
Server characterset:latin1
Db characterset:latin1
Client characterset:latin1
Conn.  characterset:latin1
UNIX socket:/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock
Uptime: 1 day 20 hours 44 min 55 sec

Threads: 5  Questions: 261810  Slow queries: 0  Opens: 1400  Flush tables: 1  
Open tables: 59  Queries per second avg: 1.625
--


 You are lucky if that's true. It isn't for me but I've been running
 myth for about 4 years now.

I've been running Myth for a while (6 years?), but this database was
created about 7 months ago when I switched from a dedicated FE/BE
machine running KnoppMyth to a split FE/BE setup where the BE runs on
a non-dedicated Gentoo machine.  Not sure how it ended up this way
other than the fact that I don't have UTF support enabled on that box
(at some point in the past, having UTF support enabled broke something
else, but I don't remember what).

 I would suggest that if you use __any__ remote frontends and there is
 any chance of someone else powering one up and using Myth then you
 should first emerge -C mythtv on ALL frontend-only machines,

The FE doesn't run Gentoo, it runs MiniMyth -- I _think_ all I need to
do is replace the 0.21 rootfs on the USB flash drive with the one
containing 0.22...

 upgrade your server, emerge mythtv-0.22 on one frontend, make sure it
 works, and then move on with any other machine.

 Good luck and report back how it goes!

-- 
Grant Edwards   grant.b.edwardsYow! Are we on STRIKE yet?
  at   
  gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 2010-03-03, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Grant Edwards

 I read the instructions for fixing the broken database encoding, but
 it appears mine is fine -- so updating to 0.22 won't be quite as
 painful as it might have been. ??I'll still have to re-build the
 frontend, since 0.22 doesn't use a compatible protocol.

 You are already using latin1 throughout your database?

 Apparently:

 $ mysql -umythtv -p mythconverg -e 'status;'
 Enter password:
 --
 mysql  Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.84, for pc-linux-gnu (i686) using readline 6.0

 Connection id:          106
 Current database:       mythconverg
 Current user:           myt...@localhost
 SSL:                    Not in use
 Current pager:          stdout
 Using outfile:          ''
 Using delimiter:        ;
 Server version:         5.0.84-log Gentoo Linux mysql-5.0.84-r1
 Protocol version:       10
 Connection:             Localhost via UNIX socket
 Server characterset:    latin1
 Db     characterset:    latin1
 Client characterset:    latin1
 Conn.  characterset:    latin1
 UNIX socket:            /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock
 Uptime:                 1 day 20 hours 44 min 55 sec

 Threads: 5  Questions: 261810  Slow queries: 0  Opens: 1400  Flush tables: 1  
 Open tables: 59  Queries per second avg: 1.625
 --


Good stuff. Not true for me.


 You are lucky if that's true. It isn't for me but I've been running
 myth for about 4 years now.

 I've been running Myth for a while (6 years?), but this database was
 created about 7 months ago when I switched from a dedicated FE/BE
 machine running KnoppMyth to a split FE/BE setup where the BE runs on
 a non-dedicated Gentoo machine.  Not sure how it ended up this way
 other than the fact that I don't have UTF support enabled on that box
 (at some point in the past, having UTF support enabled broke something
 else, but I don't remember what).

 I would suggest that if you use __any__ remote frontends and there is
 any chance of someone else powering one up and using Myth then you
 should first emerge -C mythtv on ALL frontend-only machines,

 The FE doesn't run Gentoo, it runs MiniMyth -- I _think_ all I need to
 do is replace the 0.21 rootfs on the USB flash drive with the one
 containing 0.22...

You've probably read this elsewhere but apparently an older 0.21
frontend can corrupt the MythTV database. Maybe it won't happen for
you if you're already using all latin1 everywhere. I'm not so I have
to be careful.

Cheers,
Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] vBulletin site causes Konqueror to hang

2010-03-03 Thread Dale

chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:

On Wednesday 03 March 2010 03:54:06 Dale wrote:
   

I did click around on the site earlier but I'm not registered to do
anything else.  I just went back and tried to navigate a bit more.  I
went to a thread then clicked to go back to the main page.  Dicks hat
band could not have done it better.  That thing locked up like a whore
on the front row.  lol  It was a 53% loading and trying to get something
that is 18.9Kib.  It's been a couple minutes now and it is still sitting
there.  I'm thinking that only a kill -9 will make this whore move
again.  Please excuse my humor.

So, whatever it is, it affects us both.
 


I fear the worst :-)

I see KDE-4.4.1 just showed up in the tree and the Changelog has some
interesting javascript-related bugs fixed. So what I'm gonna do is rebuild
this latest KDE and see if that makes a difference. If not, disable $STUFF one
at a time. If that doesn't work, I shall have to change a 6 year browsing
habit :-(

   


It may be safe to fear the worst.  I updated mine last night so I 
thought I would try it again with the updates.  Last time it locked up 
at about 53%.  Well they did improve it a little bit at least.  It now 
hangs at 66%.  So we have a 13% improvement.


Hey, maybe with the next updates it will work all the way to a page 
load.  Also, if you file a bug report somewhere, I got to the site, 
click on a thread then try to go back to the home page by clicking on 
the link in the top box.  So far, it has not been able to get past that 
point.  Oh, my CPU is at 100% doing whatever it is doing.


Now to go do a kill on Konqueror.

Dale

:-)  :-)



Re: [gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread stosss
 Wasn't Agrajag the toothless wonder that kept getting accidentally killed by
 Arthur Dent?

Yes



Re: [gentoo-user] vBulletin site causes Konqueror to hang

2010-03-03 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
  Also, if you file a bug report somewhere, I got to the site, click on a
 thread then try to go back to the home page by clicking on the link in the
 top box.  So far, it has not been able to get past that point.  Oh, my CPU
 is at 100% doing whatever it is doing.

FWIW I just tried it in Konqueror 4.4.0 on Windows XP (work computer)
and, while it didn't use any noticeable CPU, Konqueror did get stuck
on a blank page spawning dozens and dozens of kwalletd and kioslave
processes for about 2 or 3 minutes, and then suddenly the page
displayed and everything settled down, back to normal. It seems random
but has happened every couple pages while clicking around in the site.
Weird.



Re: [gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 10:07:22PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
 On Wednesday 03 March 2010 20:23:01 Willie Wong wrote:
  On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:59:32PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
   % ssh myt...@agrajag uptime
   
  17:58:52 up 51 days, 16:25,  1 user,  load average: 0.17, 0.10, 0.09
  
  You call it Agrajag and talk about stability? You big tempter of fate
  you.
 
 
 Wasn't Agrajag the toothless wonder that kept getting accidentally killed by 
 Arthur Dent?
 

Precisely, I hate to imagine what kind of a system will Neil decide to
call Wowbagger. 

W
-- 
Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
 et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton



Re: [gentoo-user] Advice for 64-bit n00b?

2010-03-03 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 20:04:17 Alan McKinnon wrote:
 On Wednesday 03 March 2010 19:04:45 Stroller wrote:
  On 3 Mar 2010, at 15:29, Stroller wrote:
   ...
   I have started following the Gentoo Linux AMD64 Handbook, because
   the Quick Install Guide is described as x86. Having untarred the
   stage I am surprised to find a lib32 directory. I thought
   compatibility with 32-bit binaries was optional. Or am I
   misunderstanding? This is going to be a headless server  I can't
   think that it'll need any binary packages - possibly the management
   utility for the RAID controller will be distributed as a binary, I'm
   not sure yet (the hardware RAID key was missing when I got this
   machine ☹)
 
  Further to Alan's reply, I've proceeded a little further.
 
  I'm onto section 2.3: Changing profiles, where it says:
 If you want to have a pure 64-bit environment, with no 32-bit
  applications or libraries, you should use a non-multilib profile.
 
  See my comments in the quoted above. It shouldn't be too expensive to
  enable the RAID in this machine (which is on the mainboard, but
  requires a little hardware PCB key to be fitted). That's a Dell
  PERC4, which AFAICT is a rebadged LSI megaraid.
 
  This post [1] http://tinyurl.com/3dzcl9 referrs to the management
  utility thus: MegaCLI comes as a RPM containing only a single
  statically linked 32-bit Linux binary, however `eix mega` suggests
  there may be alternatives, such as `megactl` [2]
 
  My immediate thought when reading the handbook was that it's best
  and cleanest and more right to only have 64-bit libraries on a 64-
  bit system, but this need for the RAID management utility is making me
  wonder if that would be cutting off my nose to spite my face.
 
 It has a single statically linked binary. Which probably means it already
 contains everything you will need and will run just fine. No need to build
 everything multilib; if you do need a 32bit lib, just install the
  appropriate emul-x86-linux package.

So how 'safe' is it these days to build a 64bit only system?  Would you end up 
having to rebuild with multilibs because many apps which won't work on a pure 
64bit build?
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Advice for 64-bit n00b?

2010-03-03 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch 03 März 2010, Mick wrote:

 So how 'safe' is it these days to build a 64bit only system?  Would you end
 up having to rebuild with multilibs because many apps which won't work on
 a pure 64bit build?


no, it is not safe to have a 64bit only system. Just choose the multilib 
profile and start installing. If something needs the 32bit emul libs, it will 
pull the stuff in. There is nothing you need to care about.



Re: [gentoo-user] vBulletin site causes Konqueror to hang

2010-03-03 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 22:02:06 Paul Hartman wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
   Also, if you file a bug report somewhere, I got to the site, click on a
  thread then try to go back to the home page by clicking on the link in
  the top box.  So far, it has not been able to get past that point.  Oh,
  my CPU is at 100% doing whatever it is doing.
 
 FWIW I just tried it in Konqueror 4.4.0 on Windows XP (work computer)
 and, while it didn't use any noticeable CPU, Konqueror did get stuck
 on a blank page spawning dozens and dozens of kwalletd and kioslave
 processes for about 2 or 3 minutes, and then suddenly the page
 displayed and everything settled down, back to normal. It seems random
 but has happened every couple pages while clicking around in the site.
 Weird.

Well, I'm using Konqueror 4.3.5 and tried to navigate around the forums and 
click on the top link to go to the home page like Dale did.  I tried this a 
few times on a PIII laptop, which is of course slow, but it did not get stuck.  
So, I guess it works here ...
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[gentoo-user] nepomuk 4.4 is emerged with kde 4.3

2010-03-03 Thread Xi Shen
hi,

my system is gentoo amd64, kde 4.3. and i found nepomuk, along with
some other packages, are using 4.4 version. is it correct?

also, i have a problem with nepomuk. whenever i start X, it pops up
Nepomuk was not able to find the configured database backend
'sesame2'. Existing data can thus not be. the message is truncated,
and i have no way to read them all. how can i fix this?


-- 
Best Regards,
David Shen

http://twitter.com/davidshen84/



Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia GeForce 6200 questions

2010-03-03 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 17:18:38 Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:09:06 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
   There was a patch for the 190.53 driver released yesterday to
   make it work with 2.6.33.
  
  Can you give a link please? I'm having trouble compiling
  nvidia-drivers with 2.6.33 and I can't see much on the nvidia
  site.
 
 emerge --sync and try again. the patch is now in portage.

So it is. I sync daily but I hadn't got this version until now. Thanks 
Neil.

-- 
Rgds
Peter.



Re: [gentoo-user] nepomuk 4.4 is emerged with kde 4.3

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 04 March 2010 02:27:40 Xi Shen wrote:
 hi,
 
 my system is gentoo amd64, kde 4.3. and i found nepomuk, along with
 some other packages, are using 4.4 version. is it correct?

No.

Nepomuk is slotted like KDE. I suspect you are running a stable system and 
have added nepomuk to packages.keywords and it is now pulling in latest 
~arch nepomuk



 
 also, i have a problem with nepomuk. whenever i start X, it pops up
 Nepomuk was not able to find the configured database backend
 'sesame2'. Existing data can thus not be. the message is truncated,
 and i have no way to read them all. how can i fix this?

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:07:22 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

   % ssh myt...@agrajag uptime
   
  17:58:52 up 51 days, 16:25,  1 user,  load average: 0.17, 0.10,
   0.09  
  
  You call it Agrajag and talk about stability? You big tempter of fate
  you.  
 
 
 Wasn't Agrajag the toothless wonder that kept getting accidentally
 killed by Arthur Dent?

Yes, all my hostnames are HHGTTG characters. Agrajag never crashes and
has only died once... so far.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Processor: (n.) a device for converting sense to nonsense at the speed
   of electricity, or (rarely) the reverse.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:20:50 -0500, Willie Wong wrote:

 Precisely, I hate to imagine what kind of a system will Neil decide to
 call Wowbagger. 

I've not used one yet, but I did have a laptop call Eccentrica :)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

WinErr 007: System price error - Inadequate money spent on hardware


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] nepomuk 4.4 is emerged with kde 4.3

2010-03-03 Thread Xi Shen
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thursday 04 March 2010 02:27:40 Xi Shen wrote:
 hi,

 my system is gentoo amd64, kde 4.3. and i found nepomuk, along with
 some other packages, are using 4.4 version. is it correct?

 No.

 Nepomuk is slotted like KDE. I suspect you are running a stable system and
 have added nepomuk to packages.keywords and it is now pulling in latest
 ~arch nepomuk


oh, i guess it all my fault. i tried to emerge kde 4.4 once, but
failed. i did not have time to resolve the error. so i rolled back to
kde 4.3, and did a simple emerge -uvND world. i think this did not
help me roll back the packages that were updated when i was trying to
emerge kde 4.4.

how should i roll back those miss updated packages back to 4.3? or can
someone tell me if kde 4.4 is pretty stable to use for desktop?


-- 
Best Regards,
David Shen

http://twitter.com/davidshen84/



[gentoo-user] how to add custom compilation options?

2010-03-03 Thread Xi Shen
hi,

i want to emerge the crypto++ package with the
-DCRYPTOPP_DISABLE_ASM option. i tried to add it into the CFLAGS
variable, but it did not work. please tell me how to do this.


-- 
Best Regards,
David Shen

http://twitter.com/davidshen84/



Re: [gentoo-user] Advice for 64-bit n00b?

2010-03-03 Thread Graham Murray
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com writes:

 no, it is not safe to have a 64bit only system. Just choose the multilib 
 profile and start installing. If something needs the 32bit emul libs, it will 
 pull the stuff in. There is nothing you need to care about.

What is unsafe about a 64bit only system? Surely if it were unsafe then
Gentoo would not offer no-multilib profiles? I have recently built 2
systems using a no-multilib profile and have not found any problems, and
expect to start building a third one today.



Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6.31-gentoo-r10 kernel segfaults on shutdown

2010-03-03 Thread Damian
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
 Can you make any sense of this?
 ===
 kernel BUG at kernel/time/clockevents.c:262!
 invalid opcode:  [#1] PREEMPT SMP
 [snip ...]

 note: halt[12361] exited with preempt_count 2
 /etc/init.d/shutdown.sh: line 9: 12361 Segmentation fault  /sbin/halt
 ${opts}
 ===
I had the same problem with the 2.6.32-r1 version. It is fixed as of
version 2.6.32-r7

The bug was reported, but I cannot find it.



[gentoo-user] Re: Advice for 64-bit n00b?

2010-03-03 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 03/04/2010 08:44 AM, Graham Murray wrote:

Volker Armin Hemmannvolkerar...@googlemail.com  writes:


no, it is not safe to have a 64bit only system. Just choose the multilib
profile and start installing. If something needs the 32bit emul libs, it will
pull the stuff in. There is nothing you need to care about.


What is unsafe about a 64bit only system? Surely if it were unsafe then
Gentoo would not offer no-multilib profiles? I have recently built 2
systems using a no-multilib profile and have not found any problems, and
expect to start building a third one today.


You didn't understand the question Volker was replying to.  The question 
was not about safe as in security, but rather safe as in I can 
rest assured that a no-multilib system can run every software I could 
install, which is clearly not the case since some applications need 
32-bit support.





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FreeNX password vs. ssh-key

2010-03-03 Thread Amit Dor-Shifer

Anyone?

Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:

BTW, am I the only-one who can't get x2go to build?
amit0 ~ # emerge -av x2goserver

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies / * Please fix your package 
(net-misc/x2gosessionadministration-2.0.1.10) to not use kde.eclass
/usr/portage/local/layman/nx/net-misc/x2gosessionadministration/x2gosessionadministration-2.0.1.10.ebuild: 
line 22: need-kde: command not found
* Please fix your package (net-misc/x2gohostadministration-2.0.1.4) to 
not use kde.eclass
/usr/portage/local/layman/nx/net-misc/x2gohostadministration/x2gohostadministration-2.0.1.4.ebuild: 
line 19: need-kde: command not found
* Please fix your package (net-misc/x2gouseradministration-2.0.1.8) to 
not use kde.eclass
/usr/portage/local/layman/nx/net-misc/x2gouseradministration/x2gouseradministration-2.0.1.8.ebuild: 
line 18: need-kde: command not found
* Please fix your package (net-misc/x2gogroupadministration-2.0.1.4) 
to not use kde.eclass
/usr/portage/local/layman/nx/net-misc/x2gogroupadministration/x2gogroupadministration-2.0.1.4.ebuild: 
line 19: need-kde: command not found
* Please fix your package (net-misc/x2gosystemadministration-2.0.1.5) 
to not use kde.eclass
/usr/portage/local/layman/nx/net-misc/x2gosystemadministration/x2gosystemadministration-2.0.1.5.ebuild: 
line 18: need-kde: command not found

... done!

emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy net-misc/x2gokdebindings.
(dependency required by net-misc/x2goserver-3.0.1.1 [ebuild])
(dependency required by x2goserver [argument])

Amit

Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

On 02/27/2010 01:52 AM, Joseph wrote:
I'm installing Freenx and it will not install unless I enable in 
sshd_conf

UsePAM yes (password authentication)

What is the use use of ssh-key if I have to enable PAM?


FreeNX does not support SSH keys.  It only uses one for its control 
user.


For an NX-based client/server that supports SSH keys, you might want 
to look at x2go instead.  Furthermore, FreeNX seems to be quite 
inactive upstream (last update in 2008.)  x2go is in the nx overlay.









Re: [gentoo-user] Advice for 64-bit n00b?

2010-03-03 Thread Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:44:27AM +, Graham Murray wrote:
 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com writes:
 
  no, it is not safe to have a 64bit only system. Just choose the multilib 
  profile and start installing. If something needs the 32bit emul libs, it 
  will 
  pull the stuff in. There is nothing you need to care about.
 
 What is unsafe about a 64bit only system? Surely if it were unsafe then
 Gentoo would not offer no-multilib profiles? I have recently built 2
 systems using a no-multilib profile and have not found any problems, and
 expect to start building a third one today.
 

I completely misread that, I read it as it is safe to have a 64bit only 
system.

I ran a no-multilib profile for a couple of weeks which ran fine. This isn't a 
long period of time, I know. But I had absolutely no issues in that period. The 
only reason I switched back to a multilib profile was because a math program 
for school couldn't connect to it's core functions on a pure 64-bit 
environment. 
Furthermore, I have multilib flag disabled as standard, but there are some 
things (gcc, glibc mainly) where I have set the multilib flag. And I'm not 
having any sort of problem with it.

-- 
Zeerak Waseem


pgpF8ICbdlhM6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Advice for 64-bit n00b?

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 04 March 2010 08:44:27 Graham Murray wrote:
 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com writes:
  no, it is not safe to have a 64bit only system. Just choose the multilib
  profile and start installing. If something needs the 32bit emul libs, it
  will pull the stuff in. There is nothing you need to care about.
 
 What is unsafe about a 64bit only system? Surely if it were unsafe then
 Gentoo would not offer no-multilib profiles? I have recently built 2
 systems using a no-multilib profile and have not found any problems, and
 expect to start building a third one today.


It's not unsafe in that the machine cannot work, it's unsafe in that for a 
normal desktop user's range of apps, some thing might be impossible to get 
going.

If you have a no-multilib desktop profile, and you need to install some thrid 
party app like VPN software that is 32 bit, you are stuck needing a reinstall 
(as that profile switch on a live machine is not easy nor advised).

Just be safe as use the profile that will let you use 32 bit libs if and when 
you need them.


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] nepomuk 4.4 is emerged with kde 4.3

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 04 March 2010 04:02:56 Xi Shen wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com 
wrote:
  On Thursday 04 March 2010 02:27:40 Xi Shen wrote:
  hi,
  
  my system is gentoo amd64, kde 4.3. and i found nepomuk, along with
  some other packages, are using 4.4 version. is it correct?
  
  No.
  
  Nepomuk is slotted like KDE. I suspect you are running a stable system
  and have added nepomuk to packages.keywords and it is now pulling in
  latest ~arch nepomuk
 
 oh, i guess it all my fault. i tried to emerge kde 4.4 once, but
 failed. i did not have time to resolve the error. so i rolled back to
 kde 4.3, and did a simple emerge -uvND world. i think this did not
 help me roll back the packages that were updated when i was trying to
 emerge kde 4.4.
 
 how should i roll back those miss updated packages back to 4.3? or can
 someone tell me if kde 4.4 is pretty stable to use for desktop?


4.4 is as safe to use as 4.3 (or equally broken depending on your point of 
view).

If you run an arch machine, then remove all the KDE stuff out of 
package.keywords and let emerge -avuND world do it's thing. Don't try and run 
unstable KDE on a stable machine, you end up with too much stuff in ~arch.

If you run an ~arch machine, then do nothing and let emerge -avuND world do 
it's thing.




-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] No more mythtv for Gentoo users?

2010-03-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 04 March 2010 03:28:27 Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:07:22 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
% ssh myt...@agrajag uptime

   17:58:52 up 51 days, 16:25,  1 user,  load average: 0.17, 0.10,

0.09
   
   You call it Agrajag and talk about stability? You big tempter of fate
   you.
  
  Wasn't Agrajag the toothless wonder that kept getting accidentally
  killed by Arthur Dent?
 
 Yes, all my hostnames are HHGTTG characters. Agrajag never crashes and
 has only died once... so far.

This notebook is nazgul, not because I'm a LOTR fan (which I am) but because 
it ties in nicely with the BOFH image I've been cultivating for years


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6.31-gentoo-r10 kernel segfaults on shutdown

2010-03-03 Thread Damian
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Damian damian.o...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
 Can you make any sense of this?
 ===
 kernel BUG at kernel/time/clockevents.c:262!
 invalid opcode:  [#1] PREEMPT SMP
 [snip ...]

 note: halt[12361] exited with preempt_count 2
 /etc/init.d/shutdown.sh: line 9: 12361 Segmentation fault  /sbin/halt
 ${opts}
 ===
 I had the same problem with the 2.6.32-r1 version. It is fixed as of
 version 2.6.32-r7

 The bug was reported, but I cannot find it.
Now in my computer I could find it:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15005

HTH.