On 2014-04-30 14:20, Janko Mihelić wrote:
Where do I add my suggestions?
Same for me. I don't like that the background map is so invisible, that
the city labels that do get generated seem to be generated at all zoom
levels (which is really bad at low zoom) and that they can't cope with
Het valt me op dat bij twee routingwebsites die ik veel gebruik,
fietsrouteplannerzuid.nl en yournavigation.org, de weergave van de tiles
vaak niet klopt. Er worden tiles van totaal andere gebieden weergegeven,
vaak zelfs verschillende gebieden met een horizontale scheiding. En als
je dan de
On 2014-03-06 15:22, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Vandaag kreeg ik te horen dat de P+R plekken in Nederland op in ieder
geval 161 plekken slecht gelinkt zijn aan de normale weg (en
vervolgens slecht worden gelinkt aan bushaltes uit OpenTripPlanner).
Mocht je in je eigen buurt een P+R kennen, kijk
On 2014-02-27 10:15, St Niklaas wrote:
Hi,
Wat is de definitie van een Ecoduct ?
Is een onderdoorgang dus een brugvormige eco passage ook een Ecoduct ?
Als de onder doorgang er bij hoort, mijns inziens juist, dan
ontbreken er nog een paar. Onder andere bij Elst (N225), De Bilt
(A28), Waterloo
On 2014-02-26 11:42, Dave F. wrote:
On 26/02/2014 01:02, Mike Thompson wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if the editors wouldn't allow polygon to connect
to highways.
The edges of some polygons are truly coincident with road centerlines.
For example, many municipal boundaries.
I'm not convinced
On 2014-02-26 12:31, Dave F. wrote:
On 26/02/2014 11:16, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2014-02-26 11:42, Dave F. wrote:
I'm not convinced this is usually true. It maybe UK specific, but
municipal boundaries were more likely to originally be placed on
physical boundaries to farms estates
I'm sure I'm missing something, but how can I start a message to a user
from the OSM website? I'm in my profile, Im in my messages, but I don't
see an option anywhere to start a new message.
I have done it in the past, but that must have been from the old site.
What button am I missing?
On 2014-02-08 10:34, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 08.02.2014 10:30, Maarten Deen wrote:
That's a rather counter-intuitive way of doing it isn't it? Why isn't
there just a button compose message like in any normal messaging or
e-mail client?
Yes, we could do it like it works with email - you
Two nice articles on /. and in the Guardian from/with Serge Wroclawski
about OSM and why you would want to use it.
Regards,
Maarten
(just preaching to the choir)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Shai.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Two nice articles on /. and in the Guardian from/with Serge
Wroclawski about OSM and why you would want to use it.
Regards,
Maarten
(just preaching to the choir)
___
talk
I had quite some lag in seeing an area that I worked on being rendered
on the map. It is rendered now, but while investigating I saw that the
renderd queue lenght on yevaud [1] has shot to 1000 sometime last night
and stayed that high. At the same time, the freshness of served tiles
has gone
On 2013-12-11 13:46, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 11/12/13 12:38, Maarten Deen wrote:
I had quite some lag in seeing an area that I worked on being rendered
on the map. It is rendered now, but while investigating I saw that the
renderd queue lenght on yevaud [1] has shot to 1000 sometime last
night
On 2013-12-10 18:22, Johan C wrote:
Vanuit de Future Group weet ik dat er nauwelijks belangstelling is om
na te denken over het punt aan de horizon waar OSM zou kunnen staan
over een aantal jaren. Gekoppeld aan een her en der conservatieve
cultuur (zelfs een aanpassing van osm.org [1] krijgt
On 2013-12-02 14:38, Barry Hunter wrote:
On 2 December 2013 13:17, Lester Caine wrote:
what is 'export' intended to do?
It gives option to select an area, then download a osm XML file.
Exports the map as data. If the area is big, gives direct links to
various bulk options.
There was an
On 2013-12-02 14:57, Lester Caine wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2013-12-02 14:38, Barry Hunter wrote:
On 2 December 2013 13:17, Lester Caine wrote:
what is 'export' intended to do?
It gives option to select an area, then download a osm XML file.
Exports the map as data. If the area is big
How do I close the Welcome to openstreetmap box on the new map page?
Regards,
Maarten
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 2013-11-30 13:51, Rob Nickerson wrote:
How do I close the Welcome to openstreetmap box on the new map
page?
[snip]
On the subject of the Welcome Text, the idea of being able to close
the welcome box was discussed but ultimately not implemented. The box
does go away if you log in. I should
On 2013-11-30 20:24, SomeoneElse wrote:
I understand the reticence on behalf of many people to criticise
suggestions from the (not being directly paid to do so) developers of
the osm.org site. As a software developer myself, being asked how am
I supposed to use _that_? and being told that's
On 2013-11-20 11:07, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I recently noticed that there are very long values in int_name for
some cities in Near East, e.g. the City of Sidon:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/564348842 [1]
with the int_name value:
On 2013-11-20 11:21, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Yes they should. The first version has a comment bulk import of
places, so
I assume other places in the vicinity have the same problem.
Basically it is an example of how not to do imports
On 2013-11-20 23:49, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:13:34PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/11/20 Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de
I agree, but what will we do on a practical level? I checked a dozen
arbitrary nodes and apparently nobody has cleaned up any of
I came across this gem:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/45.34907/9.31020
Is this really how we want to map toll areas? A seperate way for each
lane? (forget the fact that half of them aren't even connected).
I can imagine having seperate lanes for seperate payment methods, but
IMHO this
On 2013-10-03 14:53, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/10/3 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
All the states or countries maps I've seen in my life used the
coastline. It does not mean that the sovereignty stops at the water
line. It's just a convention.
how many states or country maps have you seen in
On 2013-09-12 10:07, Lester Caine wrote:
Johan C wrote:
Unfortunately not available everywhere yet, but as a step towards
becoming the
best map in the world: after the publication of open address data in
the
Netherlands two years ago, starting this month open traffic data will
be
available in
On 2013-09-11 09:21, Florian Lohoff wrote:
But i wouldnt be worried - There will be a day where OSM will be THE
ONLY important map provider. Its economically not possible for Nokia
and TomTom to get the same map detail level as we do. So they'll
highlight the crowd nature of OSM and try to
On 2013-08-26 14:41, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
tracks are a type of road set up for agricultural
(i.e. local traffic of who works in the fields or forests or goes
fishing) traffic.
How do you know that without any signs next to the road?
Maarten
On 2013-08-26 15:50, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/8/26 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
On 2013-08-26 14:41, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
tracks are a type of road set up for agricultural
(i.e. local traffic of who works in the fields or forests or goes
fishing) traffic.
How do you know
On 2013-08-23 15:22, Darren Biggs wrote:
I have been trying to have dirt roads show up in the render for about
a year now. I see that that the Map legend has unsurfaced road. I
have looked around but can not find any roads that have the Map
Legends use of unsurfaced road(Road, but with
I'm getting a lot of internal server errors reported by JOSM when I
download (small) areas from the server. Is there a problem with the
server?
Regards,
Maarten
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 2013-07-29 01:47, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Greg Troxel wrote:
add the shortlink link in the lower right, so you can more easily use
it to get to a URL for the current view, so you can shift-reload to
see what yfou just edited
Click the View tab.
/stuck_record
Until there is a manual or a
On 2013-07-21 22:06, Yohan Boniface wrote:
On 07/21/2013 09:49 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
IMHO at the moment they have become superfluous. There is no way
anymore
to zoom in or out more than one step at a time by using on-map controls
as there was with the old slider. So I'm using the mouse now
On 2013-07-24 15:14, colliar wrote:
On 24.07.2013 10:39, Andy Robinson wrote:
From: Maarten Deen [mailto:md...@xs4all.nl]
Would you two please report this at the right place. [1] !
Ticket created as https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/8904
Additions and observations to the ticket welcome
I made some changes this morning [1], most notably added some maxspeed
tags. Now it's over 3 hours later and I download the same area again in
JOSM and my changes are not visible.
But when I look at the history of the items (e.g. way 6701036), the
change is there. The history says
On 2013-07-23 11:43, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2013-07-23 11:36, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 23 Jul 2013, at 10:27, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I made some changes this morning [1], most notably added some maxspeed
tags. Now it's over 3 hours later and I download the same area again in
JOSM
On 2013-07-22 17:13, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 07/22/2013 05:04 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
What is wrong with having more and better features? What is the added
value of removing features?
At the time, Leaflet was considered to be the better overall
framework, with nicer looks and better
07:48, schrieb Maarten Deen:
http://mapui.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ [3][3]
It is nice to give a link to the development map (at least I assume it
is), but how do you set that marker?
Regards,
Maarten
Don't use URL-Fiddling any more (if that's what you tried), but:
- open the share box
- select
On 2013-07-21 20:18, Michal Migurski wrote:
The new icons and map controls are good and I'm getting accustomed to
them, but the process by which they made it onto the site worries me.
IMHO at the moment they have become superfluous. There is no way anymore
to zoom in or out more than one
On 2013-07-21 22:06, Yohan Boniface wrote:
On 07/21/2013 09:49 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
IMHO at the moment they have become superfluous. There is no way
anymore
to zoom in or out more than one step at a time by using on-map controls
as there was with the old slider. So I'm using the mouse now
On 2013-07-22 06:33, John Firebaugh wrote:
The rationale for making the change in Leaflet is to make it so that
you can zoom in several levels on a given point without needing to
reposition your cursor at each zoom level. For that reason, I prefer
the new behavior.
Zooming in by using the
On 2013-07-20 08:16, James Mast wrote:
I'm personally not liking that they now have hidden the long/short
links to the map location behind buttons. Instead of just one click to
get the map location, now it's two clicks and is really annoying and
slowing down work for me. :(
I agree to that.
On 2013-07-20 10:25, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
James Mast wrote:
I'm personally not liking that they now have hidden the
long/short links to the map location behind buttons.
Instead of just one click to get the map location, now
it's two clicks and is really annoying and slowing down
work for me.
On 2013-07-20 11:29, Paul Norman wrote:
From: Andrew Errington [mailto:erringt...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 11:42 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Upgraded map controls
I also didn't see any consultation on this topic. Just another fait
accompli.
The pull
On 2013-07-20 13:35, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Am 20.07.2013 11:53, schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2013-07-20 10:25, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
James Mast wrote:
I'm personally not liking that they now have hidden the
long/short links to the map location behind buttons.
Instead of just one click to get
On 2013-07-20 12:33, Paul Norman wrote:
From: Maarten Deen [mailto:md...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 2:57 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Upgraded map controls
On 2013-07-20 11:29, Paul Norman wrote:
From: Andrew Errington [mailto:erringt...@gmail.com]
Sent
I'm not sure where to report this, I hope someone here can point me in
the correct direction.
Have a look at the subwaylines here [1]
The middle one on the right of the marker is dashed, the top and bottom
ones are not. All are tagged with tunnel=yes, the only difference is
that the two that
On 2013-07-16 10:16, Christian Quest wrote:
railway=subway should not be on the route relation.
I'll delete that and see if it solves things.
Regards,
Maarten
2013/7/16 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl:
I'm not sure where to report this, I hope someone here can point me
in the
correct
Is the wiki at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org down? I've been trying for
about an hour now and can't get a connection.
Regards,
Maarten
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 2013-07-09 09:20, Simon Poole wrote:
Am 09.07.2013 09:13, schrieb Paul Norman:
I believe both clickable POIs and routing are on the to-do list but
have
suffered from a lack of people/time although keep in mind clickable
POIs
means different things to different people.
Yes, I pointed
On 2013-07-08 11:50, Stefan de Konink wrote:
GPS Fietsnavigatie - TEASI ONE (149 euri)
Speciale fietsnavigatiesoftware: voorgeinstalleerde OSM-kaarten van
27 europese landen
Dit begint wel zeer interessante proporties aan te nemen :-)
Ik roep tegenwoordig ook al tegen iedereen die een nieuwe
On 2013-05-29 09:11, Minko wrote:
Wb adresnavigatie, zowel Lambertus' osm kaarten als mijn Openfietsmap
zijn voorzien van alle BAG adressen.
Ik was de BAG alweer helemaal vergeten, maar het lijkt me leuk om daar
wat meer van te gaan importeren.
De wikipagina's
On 2013-05-29 09:44, Frank Fesevur wrote:
Op 29 mei 2013 07:43 heeft Maarten Deen het volgende geschreven:
De eerste keer dat ik het zie: een dedicated autonavigatieapparaat
met OSM
kaarten: http://www.road-navigator.com/. O.a. te koop bij de
action:
http://www.action.nl/products/view/id/3136
On 2013-05-29 11:21, Gertjan Idema wrote:
Mijn werk aan de import van BAG data staat inderdaad op een wat lager
pitje. Dat komt deels door minder tijd en ook doordat ik me de laatste
tijd wat minder goed kan concentreren.
Het gemis aan adresgegevens in OSM duikt wel steeds vaker op in
On 2013-05-29 14:05, Gertjan Idema wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 11:54 +0200, Maarten Deen wrote:
Een heel goed voorbeeld dat het niet altijd mogelijk is om adressen
aan panden te knopen zie je bij Passage de Pit in Panningen. Dit is
één gebouw met de volgende adressen:
Raadhuisstraat 4-86
De eerste keer dat ik het zie: een dedicated autonavigatieapparaat met
OSM kaarten: http://www.road-navigator.com/. O.a. te koop bij de
action:
http://www.action.nl/products/view/id/3136/-p/viewid/9/favoritelistid/45
Software is van MapFactor, kaarten van OSM. Heel leuk in de FAQ:
Ik kan het
On 2013-05-25 07:09, James Mast wrote:
http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/collapsed-i-5-bridge-gone-google-maps-almost-quickly-it-6C10067906
[1]
If I remember correctly, we had it marked as access=no and the
segment removed about an hour faster than on Google. Somebody needs to
get ahold of Rosa
Google, I get them from OSM. I certainly benefit from
having a more complete Openstreetmap.
Regards,
Maarten
2013/5/25 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
On 2013-05-25 07:09, James Mast wrote:
http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/collapsed-i-5-bridge-gone-google-maps-almost-quickly-it-6C10067906
[1
On 2013-05-23 14:38, Simon Poole wrote:
As I promised in February I investigated with our North American
counsel what they would consider acceptable use of terms similar to
the GEOCODE trademark, they came back with examples that they all
considered OK. I've created a wiki page for future
understand it wrong.
Regards,
Maarten
Am 23.05.2013 14:57, schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2013-05-23 14:38, Simon Poole wrote:
As I promised in February I investigated with our North American
counsel what they would consider acceptable use of terms similar to
the GEOCODE trademark, they came back
On 2013-05-23 16:00, Simon Poole wrote:
Am 23.05.2013 15:35, schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2013-05-23 15:10, Simon Poole wrote:
Maarten, there is no need to start the discussion at square one
again.
We did what our counsel recommended in February as reported then (so
you
can safely assume
genomen worden.
Routers zouden kunnen kijken het aantal kruisingen.
Of gewoon een voorkeur hebben voor op dezelfde weg blijven als dat
maar een paar procent in afstand/tijd scheelt.
Gr,
Floris
2013/5/21 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
On 2013-05-21 12:24, Martien Scheepens wrote:
Hallo,
Op de A4
niet alleen gaan taggen voor de renderer, maar ook nog
taggen voor de router.
Maarten
2013/5/22 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
On 2013-05-22 09:27, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
nee, dat kan er niet mee te maken hebben, dit is een route die van
tevoren berekend is.
misschien dat ie ter plekke
. Dat je dat op B-wegen vrijwel nooit kunt rijden weet de
router niet.
Maarten
2013/5/22 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
On 2013-05-22 11:45, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
in dat laatste geval zouden de 4 keer vaker afslaan toch echt
zwaarder moeten tellen dan die paar seconden tijdswinst.
Het
Vandaag is de nieuwe Waalbrug in de A50 bij Ewijk geopend. Ik heb de
nieuwe situatie zo goed mogelijk van de paar keer dat ik er de afgelopen
tijd langs ben gekomen gemapt en de oude brug op construction gezet.
Verbeteringen zijn uiteraard welkom.
Misschien een punt van aandacht: hoe wordt de
bloedt en de korste/snelste route berekend via de afrit en oprit
(snelheid op de op- en afrit is hetzelfde als op de autosnelweg).
In jouw geval waarschijnlijk de binnenbocht, dus de linkse rijstroken.
Maarten
2013/5/21 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
Vandaag is de nieuwe Waalbrug in de A50 bij
Klopt het dat er momenteel geen verbinding van de tunnelbuis richting
noorden naar de A8 is? Je wordt via de S118 en de Verlengde Stellingweg
gestuurd.
http://osrm.at/3ex
En de terugweg wordt ook niet via de Coentunnel gestuurd, maar ik hoop
dat dat is omdat way 115021650 de verkeerde kant op
On 2013-05-14 14:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Klopt het dat er momenteel geen verbinding van de tunnelbuis richting
noorden naar de A8 is? Je wordt via de S118 en de Verlengde
Stellingweg
gestuurd.
http://osrm.at/3ex
Volgens mij klopt dat niet. Ik ben gister over de A5 van Schiphol naar
Anybody heard of waze?
http://www.waze.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waze
Isn't this exactly what OSM is, only now as navigation as a
startingpoint? Looking at the map in my area (the Netherlands), I see
OSM some 6 years ago.
It seems all so superfluous to me, I don't see the point. Why
On 2013-05-07 13:53, Simone Cortesi wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Isn't this exactly what OSM is, only now as navigation as a
startingpoint? Looking at the map in my area (the Netherlands), I see
OSM some 6 years ago.
It seems all so superfluous
On 2013-04-16 10:21, Marc Gemis wrote:
Wat mij vandaag opviel op de mapnik rendering van OpenStreetMap is
dat in Nederland
de namen van de gemeenten verschillende keren voorkomen op zoom niveau
14.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.4861lon=4.8397zoom=14layers=M
[1]
bv. Chaam staat er 3
On 2013-04-06 07:05, Ronald Stroethoff wrote:
In het verleden werden gebouwen simpel getagt met building=yes.
Dit was mischien een beetje simpel maar werkte wel.
Nu blijkt dit volgens de volgende web-pagina:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
nogal uitgebreidt te zijn.
Op dit
Op 6 april 2013 21:51 schreef Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl het
volgende:
On 2013-04-06 07:05, Ronald Stroethoff wrote:
In het verleden werden gebouwen simpel getagt met building=yes.
Dit was mischien een beetje simpel maar werkte wel.
Nu blijkt dit volgens de volgende web-pagina:
http
On 2013-03-31 17:57, Clay Smalley wrote:
This seems silly and useless. The imagery is subject to change and
the way will become obsolete. I don't see a point in mapping this, and
I'm okay with deleting these ways. But I'd rather hear from someone
with more experience before anything happens.
On 2013-03-31 19:22, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 07:01:19PM +0200, Maarten Deen wrote:
It is a common and often-used method to indicate regions that have
high-resolution Bing imagery in an area where the rest is only
low-resolution.
I would not delete them. They serve
Het valt me op dat als je bij de kaart zoekt naar een weg dat alle
residential wegen als Woonerf worden aangegeven. Dat klopt natuurlijk
niet, want een residential weg is gewoon een weg. Een living_street is
een woonerf.
In de Nederlandse map_features wordt residential vertaald als straat.
Zo
On 2013-03-13 20:30, Jo wrote:
Op 13 maart 2013 19:39 schreef Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl het
volgende:
On 2013-03-13 19:25, Rob wrote:
Ho Jo
De laatste keer dat ik contact met hem had, over verwijderde items
van me, was z'n moto less is more
Hij gaat schijnbaar voor een mooie rustige
On 2013-03-05 16:22, Jochen Topf wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:57:31AM -0500, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
I worked on an Ozone monitoring instrument briefly in my career, and
my understanding is that the polar ice caps change often.
No, they don't change all that much. Of course they change a
On 2013-02-20 07:56, Toby Murray wrote:
Yes. The database server is offline. I don't know why or when it will
be back. London should be waking up here shortly. I'm sure there will
be a better response then.
Apparently they're doing something now because the map at
www.openstreetmap.org was
On 2013-02-14 11:59, Andrew Errington wrote:
In Korea we also have named junctions at overpasses, so the junction
name is
where the two roads cross (or meet) but they physically don't join
because
one road is on a bridge over the other, and there are sliproads to
move
between them.
In the
Do you exclude certain POIs from the selection? post_box, telephone and
recycling do not show any details.
There is an example for recycling and telephone here
http://overpass.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.328lon=5.98zoom=18layers=M
Regards,
Maarten
On 2013-01-04 00:25, Michal Migurski wrote:
Neat!
I found what I think is spam on my first try:
http://owl.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.8113lon=-122.2754zoom=14layers=M
Look no further than Apple Blossom Florist, the premier Oakland
florist, for beautifully arranged
On 2013-01-03 08:20, Jo wrote:
Ik begrijp de verwarring, aangezien (alleszins in JOSM) een
verkeersbordje verschijnt als je het op de laatste node zet en je geen
visuele feedback krijgt, als je de tag op de way zet. Het is echter de
way die noexit=yes moet krijgen, aangezien het de straat is
I was using a train from the Erzgebirgsbahn in Germany yesterday
(Annaberg-Buchholz - Chemnitz) when I noticed the information display.
This was an OSM background on which the trains from the Erzgebirgsbahn
were overlayed. I took a few photos but I now also see that they have an
internet
On 2012-12-23 23:53, Chris Hill wrote:
On 23/12/12 15:41, Stan Berka wrote:
Yesterday, I did navigation to my work place here in Warsaw using
Osmand o my G2. The route I was given led through Warsaw Old Town.
The problem with this is, the Old Town is closed to most vehicles,
year long,
On 2012-12-12 10:25, Hendrik Siedelmann wrote:
Hello,
all possibilities to render maps as ebooks (or for print) that I
found were relatively limited (only raster images and/or limited
number of pages).
So I tried something new:
https://technik-stinkt.de/~hendrik/maps/
What do you think?
The
On 2012-12-10 22:26, Ronald Stroethoff wrote:
Ik wordt een beetje moe van al deze edit-bots.
De berichten van echte edits verdwijnen ertussen.
Ik zie nu zelfs al edit-wars tussen de diverse bots optreden.
Ik weet niet of hier nog wel zin in heb.
Voorbeelden? Heb je de makers van die bots er
On 2012-11-22 21:14, Wolfgang Wienke wrote:
Hi
Am 22.11.2012 20:20, schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2012-11-22 12:23, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
At the other way, as we do it in Holland every roundabout should be
tags in a forward and backward way in relations when the roundabout
is
split up. One
On 2012-11-23 14:29, Cartinus wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:44 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2012-11-22 21:14, Wolfgang Wienke wrote:
Do you accept OXOMOA scheme?
This is the first that I ever hear from that scheme.
Please ignore the original oxomoa scheme when tagging bus routes
On 2012-11-22 12:23, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
At the other way, as we do it in Holland every roundabout should be
tags in a forward and backward way in relations when the roundabout
is
split up. One of the reasons relation get polluted.
But your drawing argument is a illegal one. We do not map
On 2012-11-21 11:23, Robin Paulson wrote:
tens, possibly hundreds in fact.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-51.8629lon=-58.2445zoom=13layers=M
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-51.8315lon=-58.9263zoom=12layers=M
perhaps an import gone wrong?
I think it is because all the Falkand Islands
Relation 20773 is currently at v1159. I can get the XML back to v1155
(http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/20773/1155), but versions
before that don't not show anything.
When a relation is deleted, I should still get the base info with at
least relation id=20773 visible=false, should
On 2012-11-16 11:03, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 16/11/12 08:30, Maarten Deen wrote:
Relation 20773 is currently at v1159. I can get the XML back to
v1155
(http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/20773/1155), but
versions
before that don't not show anything.
When a relation is deleted, I
On 2012-11-16 11:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 16/11/12 09:16, Maarten Deen wrote:
Can't the API give out some kind of information in such cases? An
XML
message of some sort? Now you get nothing.
No you don't, you should be getting 403 Forbidden meaning that you
are not allowed to access
Recently I came across a strech of motorway that oneway=yes set on all
sections, but parts were inverted. In ASCII art, you had a road like
o1o2o1o1o
Is there a tool to detect this? Keepright I think only checks deadend
oneways.
Regards,
Maarten
.
Moreover: the osrm website does not give a URL that you can use to
download an area in JOSM and is therefor not really useful for this.
Regards,
Maarten
-Original Message-
From: Maarten Deen [mailto:md...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: 12 November 2012 10:28
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM
On 2012-10-26 13:56, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
Een paar voorbeelden:
Stadhuis van Haarlem: www.haarlem.nl [3]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/91770410 [4]
VD in Haarlem: www.vd.nl [5]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/100611687 [6]
Voorbeeldje van restaurant met een eigen
I haven't noticed this before a few weeks ago, but when you visit a
page in the wiki and then login, you are redirected to the main page.
This is not very convenient, because logging in after navigating to a
page is usually for one purpose only: to edit the page. And certainly
users that have
On 2012-10-10 22:22, Richard Weait wrote:
What are the results?
Some respondents mentioned that close-but-not-touching ways made for
a
bad mapper but were generally very understanding on this point. It
was seen more as an indication of inexperience.
The Big Pet Peeve that identified bad
On 2012-10-05 08:24, Theun wrote:
Er wordt daar nog druk gewerkt. Is het niet verstandiger om te
wachten
tot dit is getracked en toegevoegd? Dit soort automatische
toevoegingen/aannames is één van de redenen dat ik de laatste tijd
niet veel fut heb om me met osm/fietsroutes bezig te houden.
If I read the Template:Languages correctly, there is a list of 7
languages with a dedicated namespace, a list of not more than 50 major
languages without dedicated namespace and the rest.
Indonesian (id) is currently in the rest.
Is it possible to make a list of wiki pages that have been
On 2012-09-29 23:18, Stefan de Konink wrote:
On 09/28/12 20:07, Frank Heinen wrote:
Kosten zijn vrij simpel te berekenen. Als je een cheap-ass hoster
neemt
als OVH, die bieden hosting aan voor een leuke server voor een ~ €
1500
euro per jaar
http://www.ovh.nl/dedicated_servers/eg_hybrid.xml
301 - 400 of 917 matches
Mail list logo
