--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
So if
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Can you provide any data, or any statistical analysis, or cites to
such, to support your opinion that a) there were statistically
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
The poster I was responding to was suggesting there
*were* no such anomalies (just as you were earlier),
which is ludicrous on its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+++The large volume of learned diccussion here seems to
have eclipsed the more important why of the event. N.
If that's a way of suggesting that the pile of
argumentative, self-serving, egobabble dished
up here on this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Can you provide any data, or any statistical analysis, or cites
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Many things that are investigated turn out to be insignificant.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
One more time: The press didn't make up the idea that
there were anomalies. The press reported that financial
institutions all over the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The trading anomolies were in the options trading of the 2 airlines
involved in 9/11 hijackings. The data is easily available - I do
options trading for a living. I compared the options trading in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The trading anomolies were in the options trading of the 2 airlines
involved in 9/11 hijackings. The data is easily available - I do
options trading for a living. I compared the options trading in the
relevant
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pointing out that it's
nonsensical for you to ask *me* to prove the experts
were right in thinking there were anomalies significant
enough to warrant investigation.
If all you are saying inall of this is the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
One more time: The press didn't make up the idea that
there were
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
I'm pointing out that it's
nonsensical for you to ask *me* to prove the experts
were right in thinking there were anomalies significant
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
I'm pointing out that it's
nonsensical for you to ask *me* to prove the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Can you provide any data, or any statistical analysis, or cites
to
such, to support your opinion that a) there were statistically
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
The premise I gather from judy's weak hypothesis is that Bush
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
markmeredith@ wrote:
snip
The trading anomolies were in the options trading of the 2
airlines
involved in 9/11 hijackings. The data is easily available - I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
The poster I was responding to was suggesting there
*were* no such anomalies (just as you were earlier),
which is ludicrous on its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
No, you made that up. The 9/11 commission (sixth time
now) said there were innocuous explanations for the
anomalies.
I am
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
[snip]
All I said was that there were anomalies significant
enough for there to be investigations *to see if there
had been* any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
[I wrote:]
(Hint: Providing an explanation for an anomaly does
not somehow make it no longer anomalous.)
IF the explanation is correct, it sure does.
No, it doesn't.
From Mr. Dictionary:
deviation from the common
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
[I wrote:]
It isn't my opinion that there were trading anomalies;
it's a matter of public record. I provided cites to
news reports on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
no_reply@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
[I wrote:]
It isn't my opinion that there were trading anomalies;
it's a matter of public record. I provided cites to
news reports
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
The poster I was responding to was suggesting there
*were* no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
An issue here is judy appears to equate anomoly with statistical
significant anomoly
Wrong.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
[I wrote:]
It isn't my opinion that there were trading
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
markmeredith@ wrote:
snip
The trading anomolies were in the options trading of the 2 airlines
involved in 9/11 hijackings. The data is easily available - I do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
markmeredith@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
An issue here is judy appears to equate anomoly with statistical
significant anomoly
Wrong.
The holy man who said: The world is as you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
But then, all of a sudden, she backs off and bravely declares
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/2/06 3:59:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The holy man who said: The world is as you are was wrong.
The world is as Judy Stein sees it.
oy!
Shemp *really* doesn't like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
snip
Judy. Pay attention. You were implying that Bush was behind
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
[...]
The inside job theorists have done an enormous amount
of homework on all this. I'm not personally convinced
by it, but not because there are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
[...]
The inside job theorists have done an enormous amount
of homework on all
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are too many eyewitness accounts of the plane
striking the Pentagon for this theory to be credible.
There's also been a great deal of expert debunking of
the Thierry book (which is what the article at the link
is about).
Some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are too many eyewitness accounts of the plane
striking the Pentagon for this theory to be credible.
There's also been a great deal of expert
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are too many eyewitness accounts of the plane
striking the Pentagon for this theory to be credible.
There's also been a great deal of expert
on 4/1/06 10:30 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as I suggested, it *may* be being withheld because
releasing it would put all the conspiracy theories
about its being a rocket or whatever to rest, and then
these folks would start looking more closely at other
material the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
It was pointed out that a plane of that size wouldn't punch a
round hole in a building.
Lots of people have pointed out things that simply
aren't true.
Also, as a combat veteran near the scene pointed out planes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 4/1/06 10:30 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as I suggested, it *may* be being withheld because
releasing it would put all the conspiracy theories
about its being a rocket or whatever to rest,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are too many eyewitness accounts of the plane
striking the Pentagon for this theory to be credible.
There's also been a great deal of expert
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
There are too many eyewitness accounts of the plane
striking the Pentagon for this theory
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 4/1/06 10:30 AM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
And as I suggested, it *may* be being withheld because
releasing it would put all
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are too many eyewitness accounts of the plane
striking the Pentagon for this theory to be credible.
There's also been a great
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
There are too many eyewitness accounts of the plane
striking
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
There are too many
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 4/1/06 10:30 AM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
And as I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
There are too many eyewitness accounts of the plane
striking the Pentagon for this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson
nelsonriddle2001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
There are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Do you really believe that there was more than one gunman?
do you believe he acted all on his ownwithout ANY help from anyone else?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@
wrote:
snip
It was pointed out that a plane of that size wouldn't punch a
In a message dated 4/1/06 10:32:25 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And as I
suggested, it *may* be being withheld becausereleasing it would put all
the conspiracy theoriesabout its being a rocket or whatever to rest, and
thenthese folks would start looking
In a message dated 4/1/06 10:41:19 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is a point too about the passenger list for that flight and,was
anything ever said about the passengers on the planes at WTC-there must
have been something said about them but I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 4/1/06
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 4/1/06 8:14 AM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
There are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson
nelsonriddle2001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
[...]
Do you really believe that there was more than one gunman?
do you believe he acted all on his ownwithout ANY help from anyone
else?
Although I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
snip
No, the oldest trick in the book is to let you THINK that the
powers that be let
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
snip
No, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
snip
No, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/1/06 10:41:19 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is a point too about the passenger list for that flight and,
was anything ever said about the passengers on the planes at WTC-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I think there is *some*. The most glaring evidence
that something funny was going on is what happened on
the stock market in the days before the attack. I
haven't seen anybody even attempt to make a case that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
snip
No, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
Also, as a combat veteran near the scene pointed out planes
dont sound like that- missles do
Not sure why the guy has problems with his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/1/06 6:01:50 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Great reply Shemp- it would lead me to ask if it isnt the
majority who accept what is put in front of them by the mass media
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
And I think there is *some*. The most glaring evidence
that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
And I think there is *some*. The most glaring evidence
that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
snip
And I think there is *some*. The most glaring evidence
that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
And I think there is *some*. The most glaring evidence
that something funny was going on is what happened on
the stock market in the days
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
And I think there is *some*. The most glaring evidence
that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I think the video referred to Boeing OPTIONS not stock.
Options is right; Boeing is wrong.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
And I think there is *some*. The most glaring evidence
that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
I think the video referred to Boeing OPTIONS not stock.
I haven't looked yet, but I think one can research historical
options prices on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Boeing options was my recollection from the video.
They may have said Boeing, but I've never heard
anything about funny business with Boeing options.
The video may have just gotten it wrong (which makes
you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Boeing options was my recollection from the video.
They may have said Boeing, but I've never heard
anything about funny business with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
no_reply@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Ok I checked the video.About 5 minutes into it, it says,
On Sept 6, 3150 put options on AA 4x daily put volume average.
On Sept 7, 27,294 put options on Boeing 5x daily put volume average.
On Sept 10, 4516
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Boeing options was my recollection from the video.
They may
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
And if I heard it correctly, I believe the video said $28 million was
made on the options. Hardly much of a sum for the cost and
ramifications of creating 9/11.
I've heard as much as a billion was made on
301 - 400 of 531 matches
Mail list logo
