--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if I feel a general
hostility to any Bhakti attitude, once it comes up,
it's simply my perception over the years.
Cool. That and a buck-fifty will get you a bad cup of
coffee at Starbucks.
Show me one post, just
For t3rinity, a second post on bhakti:
The following is a direct quote from a teacher that quite
a few people on this forum admire, on the subject of bhakti
and the ideal relationship of a disciple to the guru:
Take even the most insignificant word of
the guru as an order and obey it.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So are Charles Shultz comic strips art?
Yes. No. Maybe.
It's exactly the same question as Is Path X a
true spiritual path?
The answer depends entirely on who is answering
it, what they believe, and their basis for coming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@
wrote:
Amen.
I've observed two extremes in art; one you might call
the pure beauty school and one you might call the
cathartic school. The Pure
Check this out. Chris Bliss juggles to the Beatles'
Golden Slumbers, keeping time with the music and
reflecting the song's many mood changes. Turn the
volume up and stick around to the end...
http://marketplace.espeakers.com/movie.php?sid=5290aid=10558
Yahoo!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* The infidel Salman Rushdie has insulted our Holy
Prophet. You not only have our blessing to kill him;
if you do you will be rewarded financially in this
life and earn eternal life in heaven.
Actually, I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
* The infidel Salman Rushdie has insulted our Holy
Prophet. You not only have
In a message dated 3/8/06 9:24:54 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Once in a while, I'm standing here, doing
something. And I think, "What in the world
am I doing here?" It's a big surprise.
—Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld May
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is this a spoof?
http://www.glossynews.com/artman/publish/Branson-yogi-14062005.shtml
Have a look at the root; their front page.
Uns.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For t3rinity, a second post on bhakti:
The following is a direct quote from a teacher that quite
a few people on this forum admire, on the subject of bhakti
and the ideal relationship of a disciple to the guru:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
* The infidel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So are Charles Shultz comic strips art?
When asked once about a useful, workable definition for art Michael
Peter Cain offered the following:
Art is that thing in human consciousness that resists explanation.
When we
Thanks for taking the time away from your heavy reading
schedule to reply. :-)
I have no further comments, except to point out that
you found a way to ignore all of the situations you
didn't like, when the point of the exercise was to
comment on what *you* would have done if *your*
spiritual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
So are Charles Shultz comic strips art?
When asked once about a useful, workable definition for
art Michael Peter Cain offered the following:
Art
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
* The infidel Salman Rushdie has insulted our Holy
Prophet. You not only have
I haven't followed this thread closely but:
Do people see the tm mov't and or its techniques as being bhakti? How
odd. What's remotely bhakti about it? Of course one can appreciate
or be devoted to MMY, just like you can with anyone, but I've just
never seen bhakti practices or attitudes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't followed this thread closely but:
Do people see the tm mov't and or its techniques as being bhakti?
How
odd. What's remotely bhakti about it? Of course one can appreciate
or be devoted to MMY,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no further comments, except to point out that
you found a way to ignore all of the situations you
didn't like, when the point of the exercise was to
comment on what *you* would have done if *your*
spiritual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
...but you also seem to have no use for the
sentiment of it.)
Dude, what you want is for people to respect the
sentiment of bhakti while
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't followed this thread closely but:
Do people see the tm mov't and or its techniques as
being bhakti? How odd. What's remotely bhakti about
it? Of course one can appreciate or be devoted to MMY,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
So are Charles Shultz comic strips art?
Yes. No. Maybe.
It's exactly the same question as Is Path X a
true spiritual path?
The answer depends
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't followed this thread closely but:
Do people see the tm mov't and or its techniques as being bhakti?
How odd. What's remotely bhakti about it? Of course one can
appreciate or be devoted to MMY,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't followed this thread closely but:
Do people see the tm mov't and or its techniques as being bhakti?
No, definitely not.
How
odd. What's remotely bhakti about it? Of course one can appreciate
or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So where do you fall on the bhakti question?
I think it's a lot like love -- wonderful when
unforced and when it happens naturally, usually
a disaster when one has a bunch of expectations
and rules about how it's supposed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
markmeredith@ wrote:
I haven't followed this thread closely but:
Do people see the tm mov't and or its techniques as
being bhakti? How odd. What's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Apparently this thread earlier dealt with MDG being a bhakti of MMY.
There's no way Michael would be allowed to represent the mov't in any
way whatsoever given his various extracurriculars.
Michael D. Goodman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
So are Charles Shultz comic strips art?
Yes. No. Maybe.
It's exactly the same question as Is Path X a
true spiritual path?
The answer depends
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
So are Charles Shultz comic strips art?
Yes. No. Maybe.
It's exactly the
Title: Trillions of dollars
Question - - - - - - - - - - Maharishi, recently you have been promoting a program to collect funds for the eradication of poverty on the scale of trillions of dollars, which seems on such a vast scale it's hard to believe. It's hard to comprehend how this program
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In The Last Samarai, who was more devoted to the emperor, the pro-
West courtiers, or the conservative samarai?
Perhaps they were both equally devoted but in different ways?
MMY once was quoted by the Press
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, *you* define bhakti.
Through my life.
You've already tried to keep people here from
dealing with it critically.
As if I could. But I don't have your missionary zest.
snip
As you define it, which you won't.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
So are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The operative phrase, of course, being more often
than not. Obviously there are exceptions.
Moreover, liking Velvet Elvis paintings doesn't
necessarily preclude being wowed by a Rambrandt.
Individual tastes may take
bhaktif. distribution , partition , separation RV. Ta1n2d2Br. c. (cf. %{kSetra-} , %{bhaGgI-bh-}) ; a division , portion , share AitBr. ; a division of a Sa1man (also called %{vidhi} , of which 7 or 5 are enumerated) La1t2y. [743,2] Sam2k. ; division by streaks or lines Ragh. ; a streak , line
Note: forwarded message attached.
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are
effortless and do not require concentration.
Then go find out on your own the way I did. :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are
effortless and do not require concentration.
Then go find out on your own the way I
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are effortless and do not require concentration. You must've missed the "TM is not effortless" thread here sometime ago. TM is *easy* but not truly effortless. And there are many *easy* meditation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are
effortless and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
See what I mean about bullshit, and about you not
really being interested?
You've stated on numerous occasions that you have
no interest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are effortless
and do not require concentration.
You must've missed the TM is not effortless thread here sometime
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
So where do you fall on the bhakti question?
I think it's a lot like love -- wonderful when
unforced and when it happens naturally, usually
a disaster
Some of my favourite lines from Withnail and I (which I just saw
on DVD for about the 5th time...some great extras, by the way):
Monty: As a youth I used to weep in butcher's shops.
-
Monty: Flowers are simply tarts; prostitutes for the bees.
-
[about a chicken]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are effortless
and do not require concentration.
You must've missed the TM is not effortless thread here sometime
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
So where do you fall on the bhakti question?
I think it's a lot like love --
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:12 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote: I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are effortless and do not require concentration. You must've missed the "TM is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:12 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
So where
on 3/9/06 1:22 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even M. admitted this at Estes Park--that TM required some effort.
So what did he say exactly?
He quoted some verse from the Vedas, which maybe Cardemeister can find,
which reads, Be easy to us with gentle effort.
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:22 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote: I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are effortless and do not require concentration. You must've missed the "TM is not
On Mar 9, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Rick Archer wrote:on 3/9/06 1:22 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even M. admitted this at Estes Park--that TM required some effort. So what did he say exactly? He quoted some verse from the Vedas, which maybe Cardemeister can find, which reads, "Be easy to
http://tinyurl.com/mjkdu
...the state's requirement that confinements be a certain distance
from homes is working, said Eldon McAfee, lawyer for the Iowa Pork
Producers Association.
It shows the separation distance is working. We have good odor
control, even at the fence line, he said.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
See what I mean about bullshit, and about you not
really being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
So where do you fall on the bhakti question?
I think it's a lot like love --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 3/9/06 1:22 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even M. admitted this at Estes Park--that TM required some effort.
So what did he say exactly?
He quoted some verse from the Vedas, which maybe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are
effortless and do not require concentration.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
So where do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:12 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:12 PM, authfriend wrote:
snip
I would maintain that those who don't think TM is
effortless *are not doing it effortlessly*.
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 3/9/06 1:22 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even M. admitted this at Estes Park--that TM required some effort.
So what did he say exactly?
He quoted some verse from the Vedas, which maybe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:22 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:12
Oops, wrong highlight in samaapatti...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
on 3/9/06 1:22 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even M. admitted this at Estes Park--that TM required some
effort.
So what did he say exactly?
He quoted
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I genuinely want to know which
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:12
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 3/9/06 1:22 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even M. admitted this at Estes Park--that TM required some effort.
So what did he say exactly?
He quoted some verse from the Vedas, which maybe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:22 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
on 3/9/06 1:22 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even M. admitted this at Estes Park--that TM required some
effort.
So what did he say exactly?
He quoted
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:03 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:22 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I genuinely want to know which
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:12
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM,
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:18 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
on 3/9/06 1:22 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even M. admitted this at Estes Park--that TM required some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:03 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:22 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:27 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:22 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:27 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
on 3/9/06 1:22 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even M. admitted this at Estes Park--that TM required some
I would maintain that those who don't think TM is
effortless *are not doing it effortlessly*.
I would maintain they are not familiar with real
effortless
meditation and simply enjoying their easy meditation
method,
that's all.
Or perhaps you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:27 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:22 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I've already made up my mind about your lax use of words.
You made up your mind long before most of us met you.
Bingo. :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern
BS. You're supposed to start by thinking something
in particular (the mantra). I've practiced techniques
in which no such artificiality is required.
What is the specific thing you're thinking? How do you know
its
your mantra?
There *is* no mantra, or any other such
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:36 PM, sparaig wrote:
You read something and said TM requried some effort according to
MMY.
I'm asking for the exact words where MMY said that TM required
effort.
Your playing semantical games again L. You already have your answer,
now relax and live with it. Stop
Original quote :Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and the Disease of EffortRick ArcherThu, 19 May 2005 06:21:10 -0700on 5/19/05 8:04 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 19, 2005, at 8:49 AM, claudiouk wrote: For comparison's sake, what then would be the instructions for a truly effortless,
On Mar 9, 2006, at 4:57 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
I genuinely want to know which techniques out there are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 4:57 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:27 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
Even M. admitted this at Estes Park--that TM required some
effort.
So what did he say exactly?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:18 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
on 3/9/06 1:22 PM, sparaig at sparaig@ wrote:
Even
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would maintain that those who don't think TM is
effortless *are not doing it effortlessly*.
I would maintain they are not familiar with real
effortless
meditation and simply
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BS. You're supposed to start by thinking something
in particular (the mantra). I've practiced techniques
in which no such artificiality is required.
What is the specific thing you're thinking? How
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Sorry, I've already made up my mind about your lax use of words.
You made up your mind long before most of us met you.
Bingo. :-)
BZZZT.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:36 PM, sparaig wrote:
You read something and said TM requried some effort according to
MMY.
I'm asking for the exact words where MMY said that TM required
effort.
Your playing semantical
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I would maintain that those who don't think TM is
effortless *are not doing it effortlessly*.
I would maintain they are
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
