At 9:39 PM -0500 11/26/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
I just installed 5.1-release on a sparc64, and then cvsup'ed
to the latest snapshot of -current. Since that update is such
a large jump in time, I was going from a system which had no
/rescue or /libexec to one which builds every
Here is an update I would like to install before 5.2-release.
This fixes the problems that people will run into during
'make installworld' when doing a source-upgrade from
5.1-release or 5.1-security to (what will be) 5.2-release.
To test this, I first upgraded a system to 5.1-RELEASE-p11.
I then c
At 11:24 AM -0700 6/4/99, David Greenman wrote:
> someone else wrote:
>>
>> I still think the right thing is:
>> default to keepalives.
>> set the timeout to a week.
>
> I don't support increasing the default timeout. That would cause
> problems for a lot of server systems that rely on
At 7:37 PM +0100 3/5/03, Marcin CIEÂLAK wrote:
See the patches enclosed to emulators/rtc
and emulators/vmware2 ports.
Tested only for -current with:
#define __FreeBSD_version 500104
This does get it so the vmware module will load correctly at
system startup, and I think the
At 9:42 PM +0200 6/10/03, Gordon Bergling wrote:
Hi all,
Since I disable BDECFLAGS in /etc/make.conf this problem goes
away. I don't know if this effects the build process in any
other way. I had enable them around 4.5-RELEASE or so. ;)
I'm not sure what you mean by that. Did you remove a line
wh
At 2:29 PM -0500 6/11/03, Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
From: "Munehiro Matsuda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I was having the same compile error, until I commeted out
> the BDECFLAGS definition from /etc/make.conf.
>
> Looking into the problematic Makefiles, I've found that
> following Makefiles do referenc
At 9:09 AM -0700 7/14/03, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:40:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> Gordon, 'make world' times have climbed up to over 1 hour
> on a machine that used to do it in 25 minutes. Can you
> please commit to understanding how /resuce is build and
optimizing
At 1:58 PM -0700 7/16/03, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:Is it real or another troll?
:
:-Maxim
I stupidly misspelled 'announcing' in the subject line,
Well, at least you didn't misspell your name... :-)
but it's very real. Check the site out:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/
The site looks inte
At 12:48 PM +0200 6/9/02, Anton Berezin wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 02:14:09PM -0400, Trish Lynch wrote:
>
> > Anton, if you don;t get around to it this weekend, mind
> > if I take a stab at it?
>
>No, I don't mind at all. If only we can agree who does what. :-(
RPI has been running with
At 5:37 AM -0700 6/29/02, Juli Mallett wrote:
>I get identical output from dumpfs and libufs-dumpfs currently
>and I can toggle softdep flags fine with tunefs. I'd like to
>commit this by the coming Tuesday as I will be out of town
>from Tuesday morning and will not have any way to further
>work
At 4:57 PM +0200 6/26/02, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>Here's what I did to get XFree86-4 to build with the base system's
>toolchain in -CURRENT:
>
>a) ports/devel/imake-4:
>
>Replace files/patch-d and files/patch-xthreads with the attached
>patch-config::cf::FreeBSD.cf.
>
>Add the attached p
At 11:01 PM -0700 7/2/02, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I get just about the same performance for GCC2 as I
> do for GCC3 in the tests I've run so far. It makes
> me wonder what the hell GCC3 is burning all that
> cpu *on*.
One of the guys here at RPI (dec, actually) claims he got
buil
At 4:57 PM +0200 6/26/02, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>Here's what I did to get XFree86-4 to build with the base system's
>toolchain in -CURRENT:
I thought I'd try this out. Before starting, I did a cvsup of
all my ports tree.
>a) ports/devel/imake-4:
>
>Replace files/patch-d and files/patch-xthre
At 3:18 AM -0400 7/3/02, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>At 4:57 PM +0200 6/26/02, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>>c) ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server:
>>
>>Add the attached patch-gcc31, taken from Motoyuki Konno's post to
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the fo
At 4:00 AM -0400 7/3/02, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>I started up XDM, and that also worked. Not only that, but my
>machine didn't instantly reboot when XDM started, which had been
>happening to me for the last few days...
Bah humbug. I went to log into XDM, and the machine sat th
At 5:26 PM +0300 7/3/02, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to upgrade installed XFree86-4-Server package,
>but found that a new gcc can't compile it. Following is
>relevant error output:
[...skipped...]
>Please investigate & fix.
Some information is in the email-thread under the subje
At 9:27 AM -0700 7/3/02, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 03, 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > Sheldon has a few informative messages which include
> > some patches to test. (although I don't think the patches
>> are a complete fix for the problems we
At 10:38 AM -0700 7/3/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
>Julian Elischer wrote:
>> TAILQ_FOREACH_REMOVABLE or TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE
>> (I prefer the first) are my suggestions for the name.)
>
>TAILQ_FOREACH_MODIFY ?
I sense great material for a bikeshed... :-)
For mine, how about: TAILQ_FOREACH_VOLATI
At 8:07 PM +0200 7/3/02, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>Yes, remember that you're building the MATROX stuff, which I'm not.
Yes, I should have mentioned that. Is Maxim compiling the matrox
drivers? Perhaps I should retry without those.
>Also, remember that my patches were for the base system's toolchai
At 11:16 AM +0100 7/5/02, Paul Richards wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 10:52, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > On (2002/07/05 10:45), Paul Richards wrote:
> > > I'd like to resurrect it's original meaning and add code
> > > to clean out old versions of Perl.
> >
> > This would not fit in with the rest
At 3:33 PM -0700 7/5/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
>So, to summarize:
>
Let me summarize my own position.
There are a number of files which installworld does install. After
an installworld is done, there may be a number of files on a person's
hard disk which were not put there by the most recent i
At 3:05 AM +0100 7/6/02, Paul Richards wrote:
>Let's start with a premise: No-one running current is using
>it for anything other than developing FreeBSD.
This is assumption is too limiting.
People running -current are doing it to test the latest builds.
What they *do* to test it is their busine
At 12:42 PM +0100 7/6/02, Paul Richards wrote:
>On Sat, 2002-07-06 at 03:46, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>> At 3:05 AM +0100 7/6/02, Paul Richards wrote:
>> >Let's start with a premise: No-one running current is using
>> >it for anything other than developing FreeB
At 12:04 PM +0200 7/16/02, John Angelmo wrote:
>Hello
>
>I erased my /usr/ports just to be sure that all the different
>patches out, then cvsuped to get the latest version, to my
>disappointment XFree86-4 Still dosn't build under Current, I
>still got the same perl error in fonts, the perl port is
At 7:27 PM -0600 7/16/02, Eric Anholt wrote:
>It notably doesn't include md5summing of Wraphelp.c. If I can
>find what's the 'best' Wraphelp.c (and most legal? What's the
>status of wraphelp importing/exporting?), I'll switch it. Is
>there any circumstance when someone wouldn't have access to
>
At 11:42 PM +0200 7/17/02, John Angelmo wrote:
>John Baldwin wrote:
>>Hey all (ab)users of -current. Please try to work on getting -current
>>as stabilized as possible in the next few days and hold off on any
>>large changes until after re@ creates the Perforce branch for DP2 on
>>Friday.
>
>Well
I just thought I'd mention a little problem I ran into, because I had
not seen anyone else mention it. It might be specific to my PC
hardware, and actually it was pretty simple to solve once I took
the time to look into it. I don't know that anything needs to be
done about any of this, but perha
At 7:53 PM -0600 7/17/02, Eric Anholt wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 18:40, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> > XDM generally did still seem to come up okay, although occasionally
> > the system would panic right at that initial XDM startup. While
> > I tried a few thing
At 7:18 PM + 7/29/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I cvsup'd on Friday of last week, after I restored /usr. Did
>the fix come later than that? I'm kind of afraid to try it
>again :) Thanks, Rob.
The fix in question was to -stable, not -current (I am not sure
if that was mentioned earlier).
At 12:01 PM +0200 7/26/02, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>Erik Greenwald wrote:
>>speaking of, is there any good way to automatically eliminate old
>>unnecessary parts of the base?
>
>>should there be one? :)
>
>An increasing number of people seem to believe that and there has
>been some discussion la
At 6:43 PM -0700 7/26/02, karl agee wrote:
>system: 5.0-current.
>
>trying to print to a post script laser printer which works fine
>in the past. setup using apsfilter.
>
>When I attempt to print any file from any program the desktop
>locks up then the system reboots. why?
Try copying a postsc
At 1:36 PM -0400 8/15/02, Robert Watson wrote:
>Someone needs to restructure the driver to match some our other
>pseudo-device drivers where the device is properly created as
>part of module initialization. If fixed this and other things
>locally at one point on my notebook, but eventually got
>s
At 4:59 PM -0400 9/2/02, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>On Sunday 01 September 2002 05:58 pm, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>= GCC 3.2.1-pre is now in the tree. Please let me know if you
>= see any problems recompiling your world/kernel.
>=
>= Remember to recompile your C++ ports. GCC 3.2 is not binary
>= comp
At 12:58 AM -0700 9/5/02, walt wrote:
>cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro-c /usr/src/usr.bin/gcore/elfcore.c
>/usr/src/usr.bin/gcore/elfcore.c: In function `elf_coredump':
>/usr/src/usr.bin/gcore/elfcore.c:128: syntax error before "nleft"
>/usr/src/usr.bin/gcore/elfcore.c:131: `nleft' undeclared (fi
At 6:02 PM -0400 9/24/02, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>< said:
>
> > When's the first time the FreeBSD sort(1) man page mentioned that
> > this syntax was deprecated? Can we at least start from there?
>
>It does not appear to have ever been properly documented.
>
>I don't object to maintaining backw
At 10:22 AM +0100 9/26/02, Mark Murray wrote:
>Hi
>
>The attached patch gets done by me any time I set up a FreeBSD
>box (I like lots of VTYs and X on ALT-F12).
>
>Any objections to my committing this?
I think the we will have more users who are hurt (or at least
annoyed) by moving X, then we hav
At 2:28 PM +0200 10/2/02, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>We're at a lucky moment in time, where there's only one version of
>expat in the ports tree. But think about what happens when there
>are two mainstream versions at large again.
>
>Please let's learn from past mistakes and give this library a
>compl
At 9:37 AM -0400 10/3/02, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > Garance A Drosihnwrites:
>>
>> >I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have
> > >it's own name, even if it's just "expat2fb".
> >
>> It sounds to me like this sums it up nicely. The thing about it
>> I like is that i
At 5:56 PM +0300 10/4/02, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>Hi there!
>
>I'd like to rename src/lib/libexpat to src/lib/libbsdxml.
>The reason I think it should be done is the output of the
>following command (libpam not being an exception here):
>
>cd src/lib; for dir in lib*; do [ "$dir" != "lib`cd $dir; m
At 9:02 PM +0200 10/4/02, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>There are numerous architectural issues which have never been
>fixed in vinum, and one or more of these bits now.
>
>Whoever loves vinum will have to chase it/them down and fix it.
>
>If I receive patches or requests for changes to GEOM as result
At 9:37 AM +0800 10/6/02, suken woo wrote:
>hi,all:
>getting the following error messages during rpm. thanks any info.
>===> Building for rpm-3.0.6_6
>gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/archivers/rpm/work/rpm-3.0.6'
>gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
>*** Error code 2
>
>Stop in /usr/po
At 9:16 AM +0930 10/8/02, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>On Monday, 7 October 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > I think that we need a mtree.obsolete that goes through and deletes
>> these sorts of things as part of installworld/upgrade scripts.
>
>I think we can greatly simplify things with one fir
At 10:55 AM +0930 10/8/02, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 21:18:10 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >> On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 20:07:37 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >>> I don't think doing this by default is a g
At 11:29 AM +0930 10/8/02, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 21:57:28 -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > How about for each directory, if there are old files found in the
>> directory then create a ".OLDINSTALL" sub-directory, and mov
At 11:31 AM +0930 10/8/02, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > "install -C" doesn't change the timestamp, so you'll have tons of
>> files that are older than "some file in the build tree".
>
>What does the last access timestamp look like after install -C?
What does the last-access timestamp look lik
At 11:45 AM +0930 10/8/02, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>On Monday, 7 October 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > I bought the PC, freebsd did not. Maybe it is convenient for me to
>> have a file there. Maybe I did it by mistake. Maybe it's a core
>> fi
At 3:09 PM -0600 10/9/02, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> Danny> And a list of files to delete would have saved many emails
> Danny> about the GCC being broken when the old headers just needed
> Danny> to be deleted.
>
>We could add 'rm -rf /usr/include/*' at a suitable point inside
>the ins
At 2:00 PM -0700 10/9/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
>"Danny J. Zerkel" wrote:
> > And a list of files to delete would have saved many emails
> > about the GCC being broken when the old headers just needed
> > to be deleted.
>
>No, it wouldn't.
>
>The same people who failed to read the mailing list,
At 11:40 AM -0700 10/29/02, Raymond Kohler wrote:
I'm now a stable user, and I'm considering moving to current to
get a jump on upgrading and help with the testing effort.
Note that -current is a much wilder place than -stable.
I have some questions about its performance:
1) How is the speed
At 6:13 PM -0500 11/8/02, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: All the ports are going to be rebuilt for the release anyways,
: so this doesn't affect fresh installs, correct?
At 11:13 PM + 11/8/02, Mark Murray wrote:
> > I mean *all* the cruft -- old modules and config files,
> > deprecated binaries and man pages, even old shlibs if it's safe.
>
> I agree with you, and I was giving an example that a lesser
> form of this is already required during the upgrade.
At 10:17 PM -0800 11/12/02, Doug Barton wrote:
David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 08:58:44AM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> IMVHO, the perl wrapper should be removed altogether, and the
> perl port's "use.port" symlink-creating feature should be used
> instead.
> Do we have consens
At 2:01 AM -0800 11/14/02, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
Why can't someone with a fresh stable do an ls -R /
And someone with a fresh current do the same?
Because that's only part of the story. What about people updating
from other supported "source
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:19:11AM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
I have a machine that is running -current from October 10, 2002. It had
been running fine for about two weeks--up until I had to reboot it.
When it came back up, one of my disks apparently lost its disklabel.
> Is there any
This is something I noticed while installing 5.0-dp2. I'm not sure
how much we'd want to change it.
I'm installing dp2 on a 4-gig disk. I want to split that in two,
with "dos" for the first 2 gig and freebsd in the last 2 gig. When
I got to the disklabel step, I tried the "Auto Defaults" option
At 1:57 AM -0800 11/23/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
This is something I noticed while installing 5.0-dp2. I'm not sure
> how much we'd want to change it.
The default swap size calculation is done on the basis of a multiple
of the physical memory size. Spec
I'm playing around with installing a number of freebsd releases on
the same PC, and something came up which makes me a little uneasy.
I understand why I am seeing what I'm seeing, I'm just uneasy about
what it might mean for people who will pick up 5.0-release and start
testing it on their own mach
At 11:43 PM -0700 11/23/02, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: The one case (so far) where this seemed to make a difference
: was libposix1e. It was disconnected from the build by revision
: 1.119 of src/lib/Makefile b
At 5:50 PM -0800 11/25/02, Nate Lawson wrote:
More info. Someone should bite one of these times. So far I've
got no takers so if interested, please help.
I've got a box that was operational but no more procs (can't log
in). It looks like the nightly 'make -j3 buildworld' hung it. I
left it in
At 2:34 PM -0600 11/27/02, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> Why is this actually necessary for SAMBA?
Is it necessary for all three of these to permit this, or is
it sufficient to (for example) allow it in the group name?
Samba needs a user account for the domain "machine account"
the machin
At 1:24 PM +0900 11/28/02, NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are two "adduser" scripts. One is perl, and one was written
to use "pw" and provide the same semantics, in a shell script, as
part of the "perl purge" that happen
At 7:06 PM -0800 11/27/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote:
> My /usr/sbin/adduser, updated on Nov/23/2002 21:58 JST, does not
> call pw command. It adds account to /etc/master.passwd and
> invokes 'pwd_mkdb'.
>
See 'sub new_users' function in /usr/sbin/adduser.
There are two "a
At 7:06 PM -0800 11/27/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote:
> My /usr/sbin/adduser, updated on Nov/23/2002 21:58 JST, does
> not call pw command. It adds account to /etc/master.passwd and
> invokes 'pwd_mkdb'.
>
See 'sub new_users' function in /usr/sbin/adduser.
There are two "a
[to follow-up on what I said in a different thread...]
On my 5.0-dp2 system, if I ignore /usr/local and /usr/ports, it
looks like the following files installed by -dp2 are perl scripts:
/usr/bin/mmroff
/usr/bin/afmtodit
/usr/sbin/adduser
/usr/sbin/rmuser
/usr/share/examples/cvs/contri
At 3:46 PM -0800 12/1/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
[ ... Partition ID changes ... ]
> > But as I said, this is rather marginal and I really don't
> > feel it should go in unless this xor-0x10 convention is
> > more widespread.
>
> partition magic does this too. isn't the correct failure mode
>
At 8:06 AM +0100 12/2/02, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
WHY ARE WE NOT RESPECTING THE DECISION TO HIDE THE THINGS?
A user installed the software doing the hiding on purpose.
The software changed the ID hide it, on purpose.
Windows ignores these partitions -- on purpose.
I'm really sorry for crea
At 4:15 PM +0100 12/15/02, Petr Holub wrote:
Hi,
I tried to compile arla 0.35.11 on FreeBSD 5.0-RC1. First I got
following error:
checking for memcpy in kernel... yes
checking if vnode_if.h needs to be built... configure: error: unable
to find any vnode_if script
So I have linked
-su-2.05b# ln
For those of us with multi-processor systems, would there be an
already-compiled SMP kernel available somewhere on the official
ISO's? Do people think that would be a useful item to include?
I was thinking of just having a /boot/kernel-smp directory, for
people to load in if they want to try it.
At 5:58 AM +0100 12/17/02, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Also didn't someone mention that GCC has got slower anyway ?
gcc is slower at compiling things. This is very noticeable when
you're doing a buildworld. The code which gcc 3.2.1 produces
does not seem any slower than the code produced by gcc 2
At 6:24 PM +0100 2/23/02, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>Thumbs up and big cheers to all of you (well, us) guys working on
>-CURRENT. It's pretty stable and has been for a while now - and
>even on my poor old 350 MHz K6-2, it performs well enough to make
>a kickass desktop & development platform. L
At 1:00 AM -0800 2/24/02, Julian Elischer wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > It is working fairly well for me too, on a dual-pentium machine.
>> I can't get vmware2 working, but most of everything else that I
>> do is working, and I'm
At 4:53 PM -0500 2/26/02, Robert Watson wrote:
>The purpose of this message is to initiate a serious discussion
>of what guidelines might be put in place to help facilitate the
>use of additional version control mechanisms [...]. I've mixed
>in some suggested things to think about as possible ans
At 6:55 PM -0800 2/26/02, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > (1) The timeout begins when contention occurs, of the lock has been
>> declared. This means that if you seriously intend to do some work,
>> you can say "I'm going to do the work", but you don't risk losing the
>> lock until som
At 7:27 PM -0800 2/26/02, Julian Elischer wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
>> That would be me...
>>
> > I meant "lock" in the sense of expecting no one to make any
> > major changes in the same area of code. I seem to remember
&
At 6:48 PM -0800 2/26/02, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:00:52AM -0500, Kevin Way wrote:
>
>> I, for one, lost interest in doing the work when I realized I was
>> receiving, quite literally, 5 times more complaints than combined
>> patches, constructive criticism or positive f
At 1:27 PM -0800 2/27/02, Julian Elischer wrote:
>There are saveral places (e.g. if_ie.c) where data
>is copied out of a buffer that is shared with the hardware.
>
>The pointer to this is correctly labelled as "volatile", though
>at the time we will copy the data out we know it to be stable.
Note
At 1:15 PM -0800 3/6/02, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> This has been broken for several days now, maybe longer. It
> would be nice if whoever broke it would fix it.
Is this in a 'make buildworld' step? I just did one buildworld
on i386, and it completed fine (src is cvsup'ed as of about noon)
At 5:43 PM +0200 3/7/02, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>"Michael D. Harnois" wrote:
> > Could this have anything to do with the fact that, since I built
> > world yesterday, I can't log in as root?
>
>Bah, just completed `make world' after doing `make includes' and
>found that I can't login as *any* user
At 7:04 PM -0800 3/7/02, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>:Bruce also had some comments which were shrugged off, I thought they
>:were important. Specifically, please do not make unnecessary changes
>:to the assembler code. Macros do not need to be defined before they
>:are used, I believe this was the ju
At 9:25 PM +0300 3/7/02, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> fix is incomplete because 'u_int32_t' is not defined
>(but must be) for standalone . Please add some includes
>for u_int32_t definition too, probably
As a minor side question, should we also have that defined as
uint32_t instead of u_int32_t ?
At 10:17 AM -0600 3/8/02, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
>Yes. Recent changes to netinet/in.h have made it require the
>inclusion of arpa/inet.h. As well, arpa/inet.h must include
>netinet/in.h. IOW, each of these files must #include the
>other in order to work correctly.
>
>As you might guess, this
At 4:57 AM +1100 3/9/02, Bruce Evans wrote:
>I'm surprised that everyone hasn't complained about world breakage
>from this. It has been broken for almost 2 weeks now. Everything
>that goes near ntohl and has WARNS >= 2 fails to compile. Without
>WARNS, the bug is reported as above, but a bogus
One thing to keep in mind here is that this is still going to be
a snapshot of -current, and not a production release of -stable.
We want a snapshot that does not have any serious problems, but
"innocent users" should still realize that there are definitely
going to be a lot of loose ends and roug
>On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Murray Stokely wrote:
> >As discussed at BSDCon, the release engineers are committed
> > to releasing a relatively stable snapshot of FreeBSD -CURRENT
> > on or around April 1, 2002.
Will this release include some kind of bootable-install support
for any new hardware p
At 6:32 PM -0600 3/8/02, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> > Try compiling KDE after installing a world with the
> > following patch applied:
> > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/patches/endian-ng3.diff
>>
> > I plan on committing this on Sunday.
>
>I don't know if its related to this patch, but I
At 2:17 PM -0500 3/15/02, Robert Watson wrote:
>My feeling is that at this point, we probably should just use
>Perforce due to limitations in CVS.
This seems fine to me. I am uneasy about perforce in cases
where someone is developing something which is *meant* to be
merged back into the main bra
At 1:15 AM -0800 3/17/02, Murray Stokely wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 01:08:43AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
>> Minimally, pick a date, and then do a CVS diff against that
>> date, and include it on the CDROM.
>
> I would be happy to do this. I checked out a copy of the CVS tree
>right bef
At 8:35 AM -0800 3/17/02, David O'Brien wrote:
>My earlier concerns about the use of Perforce were when a developers
>expected other developers to use Perforce for _shared_ development.
>Or that tried to claim that their code was "published" if it was
>in the Perforce depot on Freefall.
Exactly m
At 10:36 PM -0800 3/17/02, whoever wrote:
>Hi,
> I updated to current 5.0
>several weeks back and just noticed that
>the utmp logging for people users logged
>in is missing. [...] All the listings in
>last are also incomplete.
>The last login entry for any ttyv* is the
>last day I ran 4.4 s
At 2:54 PM -0600 3/23/02, Jim Bryant wrote:
>last cvsup, less than an hour ago.
>
>
I started with an empty obj-tree, and I ended up with an error
from make being unable to make smbus.h
In my case, I just reversed the change which made version 1.3 of:
http://www.freebsd.
I've just upgraded my i386-current box from about March 13 to
a snapshot from late last night. Now when I run vmware, the
vmware program dies with:
VMware Workstation PANIC: BUG F(571):1607 bugNr=2302
when I try to "Power on" some virtual machine. When I got in
today, I cvsup'ed again, rem
At 4:34 PM -0800 3/23/02, David wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 05:23:35PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > I think we should keep AJ enabled until at least DP2. It has
> > found bugs in the past, and I suspect that a lot of new code
> > is going in between now and then.
>
>Robert Watson
At 6:36 AM +0100 3/26/02, Mark Santcroos wrote:
>Currently rebuilding with latest sources, will look into
>it after that.
Whatever the problem had been, it looks like it was fixed
between March 23 and today (the 26th). I did a buildworld
as of 4pm or so, and vmware2 is up and running OK on the
m
At 10:46 PM -0800 3/30/02, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 05:54:36PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 06:43:13PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > > No. This isn't something that is guaranteed to work per
> > > the standards, iirc. The proper fix is to put
At 11:27 PM +0200 4/5/02, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>For the life of me I cannot understand why we feel the
>need to whine like that at any root which crosses our
>way, so unless somebody can explain to me why this is
>vital, I'll commit the following patch.
There are times when it has been useful
At 6:29 PM -0500 5/9/02, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > Symlink or redirector, but please not this. :-)
>
>Shouldn't ports *not* touch anything outside of ${PREFIX}?
>I, for one, can't stand when ports do that
>(except /etc/shells -- that's different).
I agree. That's why a redirector makes more sens
At 11:18 AM -0700 5/11/02, Julian Elischer wrote:
>seems something broke in the networking side of things using
>host-only networking.. vmnet1 doesn't show up any more..
>
>If I have a moment I'll look for it but if anyone has
>familiarity with it feel free to get there forst..
>
>oh yeah.. it doe
At 7:02 PM +0300 5/22/02, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>The upgrade instructions found in src/UPDATING and src/Makefile.inc1
>are not quite correct. Suggesting to reboot with the new kernel
>and non-matching userland is safer than opposite of course, but
>does not always work nor guaranteed to work at a
201 - 298 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
